2020 Meistriliiga Season
146 games
Champion
Flora
74 points · 13th Title
Last Title: 2019
Relegated
No relegation
Biggest Overachiever
Flora
11.51 points above expected
74 points · 62.49 expected points
Biggest Disappointment
Narva Trans
12.09 points below expected
21 points · 33.09 expected points
League Table
The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.
| # | Team | GP | W | D | L | Pts | GF | GA | GD | SimPts | vsSim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flora Champion | 27 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 74 | 66 | 16 | +50 | 62.49 | +11.51 |
| 2 | Paide Linnameeskond | 27 | 20 | 0 | 7 | 60 | 70 | 30 | +40 | 49.80 | +10.20 |
| 3 | Levadia | 27 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 53 | 62 | 35 | +27 | 54.53 | -1.53 |
| 4 | Nomme Kalju | 27 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 49 | 48 | 19 | +29 | 55.15 | -6.15 |
| 5 | Tammeka | 27 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 31 | 30 | 41 | -11 | 31.95 | -0.95 |
| 6 | Tulevik Viljandi | 27 | 9 | 3 | 15 | 30 | 27 | 43 | -16 | 26.43 | +3.57 |
| 7 | Tallinna Legion | 27 | 6 | 7 | 14 | 25 | 21 | 42 | -21 | 30.32 | -5.32 |
| 8 | Narva Trans | 27 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 21 | 26 | 45 | -19 | 33.09 | -12.09 |
| 9 | Kuressaare | 27 | 4 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 26 | 59 | -33 | 18.64 | +1.36 |
| 10 | Tallinna Kalev | 27 | 5 | 3 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 64 | -46 | 18.46 | -0.46 |
| # | Team | GP | W | D | L | Pts | GF | GA | GD | SimPts | vsSim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flora | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 1 | +9 | 86.10 | -80.10 |
| 2 | Tallinna Legion | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 36.16 | -30.16 |
| 3 | Levadia | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 59.84 | -55.84 |
| 4 | Narva Trans | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 30.35 | -26.35 |
| 5 | Kuressaare | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 26.26 | -22.26 |
| 6 | Paide Linnameeskond | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 67.81 | -63.81 |
| 7 | Tallinna Kalev | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 24.90 | -22.90 |
| 8 | Nomme Kalju | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 55.92 | -55.92 |
Top Overachievers & Disappointments
Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.
Biggest Overachievers
| # | Team | Actual | Sim | vsSim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flora | 74 | 62.49 | +11.51 |
| 2 | Paide Linnameeskond | 60 | 49.80 | +10.20 |
| 3 | Tulevik Viljandi | 30 | 26.43 | +3.57 |
| 4 | Kuressaare | 20 | 18.64 | +1.36 |
| 5 | Tallinna Kalev | 18 | 18.46 | -0.46 |
Biggest Disappointments
| # | Team | Actual | Sim | vsSim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Narva Trans | 21 | 33.09 | -12.09 |
| 2 | Nomme Kalju | 49 | 55.15 | -6.15 |
| 3 | Tallinna Legion | 25 | 30.32 | -5.32 |
| 4 | Levadia | 53 | 54.53 | -1.53 |
| 5 | Tammeka | 31 | 31.95 | -0.95 |
Top Streaks
Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.
Most Unlikely Winning Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paide Linnameeskond | 11 | Jul 25 – Oct 25 | 1 in 295 |
| 2 | Flora | 13 | Jul 11 – Oct 28 | 1 in 56 |
| 3 | Kuressaare | 2 | May 30 – Jun 2 | 1 in 42 |
| 4 | Tallinna Kalev | 2 | Oct 31 – Nov 8 | 1 in 21 |
| 5 | Narva Trans | 2 | Jul 8 – Jul 11 | 1 in 16 |
Most Unlikely Losing Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paide Linnameeskond | 3 | Jul 8 – Jul 17 | 1 in 22 |
| 2 | Flora | 1 | Jul 8 – Jul 8 | 1 in 20 |
| 3 | Narva Trans | 4 | Oct 21 – Nov 8 | 1 in 13 |
| 4 | Tallinna Kalev | 8 | Jul 31 – Sep 26 | 1 in 11 |
| 5 | Tulevik Viljandi | 5 | Aug 2 – Sep 12 | 1 in 11 |
Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tallinna Legion | 4 | Sep 13 – Oct 4 | 1 in 18 |
| 2 | Narva Trans | 5 | Jul 8 – Aug 1 | 1 in 15 |
| 3 | Paide Linnameeskond | 11 | Jul 25 – Oct 25 | 1 in 14 |
| 4 | Tulevik Viljandi | 3 | Sep 19 – Sep 30 | 1 in 11 |
| 5 | Kuressaare | 2 | May 30 – Jun 2 | 1 in 9 |
Most Unlikely Winless Streaks
| # | Team | Games | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Narva Trans | 10 | Mar 7 – Jun 30 | 1 in 119 |
| 2 | Tallinna Legion | 7 | May 30 – Jun 30 | 1 in 116 |
| 3 | Kuressaare | 17 | Jul 7 – Nov 7 | 1 in 43 |
| 4 | Tallinna Kalev | 17 | Jun 6 – Sep 26 | 1 in 24 |
| 5 | Levadia | 4 | Jun 13 – Jul 1 | 1 in 23 |
Position Race
Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.
Recent Form
Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.
| Team | Elo | Season Pts | Form | Elo Δ (5) | Points (5) | Expected (5) | Actual − Exp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flora | 1549 | 80 | +65 | 13 | 10.6 | +2.4 | |
| Paide Linnameeskond | 1338 | 64 | -5 | 10 | 8.9 | +1.1 | |
| Levadia | 1341 | 57 | +18 | 10 | 8.2 | +1.8 | |
| Nomme Kalju | 1257 | 49 | -65 | 2 | 6.7 | -4.7 | |
| Tallinna Legion | 1049 | 31 | +9 | 7 | 7.8 | -0.8 | |
| Tammeka | 1031 | 31 | +19 | 7 | 5.6 | +1.4 | |
| Tulevik Viljandi | 965 | 30 | -36 | 1 | 5.0 | -4.0 | |
| Narva Trans | 977 | 25 | -45 | 4 | 7.4 | -3.4 | |
| Kuressaare | 868 | 24 | -4 | 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 | |
| Tallinna Kalev | 878 | 20 | +49 | 8 | 4.9 | +3.1 |
Head-to-Head
Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.
| Team | FLO | KUR | LEV | NT | NK | PL | TK | TL | TAM | TV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flora | — |
3-0-0
7.97
|
3-0-0
5.64
|
3-0-0
7.28
|
2-1-0
5.39
|
3-0-0
5.89
|
3-0-0
7.87
|
3-0-0
7.38
|
2-1-0
7.32
|
2-0-1
7.59
|
| Kuressaare |
0-0-3
0.64
|
— |
0-1-2
1.06
|
1-1-1
2.22
|
0-1-2
0.97
|
0-0-3
1.08
|
1-1-1
4.35
|
0-3-0
2.62
|
1-0-2
2.64
|
1-1-1
3.00
|
| Levadia |
0-0-3
2.79
|
2-1-0
7.47
|
— |
2-1-0
6.68
|
1-1-1
3.95
|
1-0-2
4.93
|
3-0-0
7.44
|
3-0-0
6.68
|
1-2-0
6.87
|
3-0-0
6.99
|
| Narva Trans |
0-0-3
1.24
|
1-1-1
6.22
|
0-1-2
1.78
|
— |
0-0-3
1.81
|
1-0-2
1.78
|
1-1-1
6.34
|
1-1-1
4.55
|
0-2-1
4.30
|
1-0-2
5.22
|
| Nomme Kalju |
0-1-2
3.03
|
2-1-0
7.57
|
1-1-1
4.47
|
3-0-0
6.65
|
— |
1-0-2
5.08
|
3-0-0
7.58
|
1-1-1
6.94
|
1-2-0
6.98
|
2-1-0
7.30
|
| Paide Linnameeskond |
0-0-3
2.54
|
3-0-0
7.45
|
2-0-1
3.48
|
2-0-1
6.69
|
2-0-1
3.34
|
— |
3-0-0
7.38
|
3-0-0
6.65
|
3-0-0
6.23
|
2-0-1
7.00
|
| Tallinna Kalev |
0-0-3
0.73
|
1-1-1
4.07
|
0-0-3
1.09
|
1-1-1
2.10
|
0-0-3
0.97
|
0-0-3
1.14
|
— |
1-1-1
2.55
|
1-0-2
2.27
|
1-0-2
2.91
|
| Tallinna Legion |
0-0-3
1.15
|
0-3-0
5.82
|
0-0-3
1.78
|
1-1-1
3.87
|
1-1-1
1.54
|
0-0-3
1.81
|
1-1-1
5.88
|
— |
2-0-1
4.09
|
1-1-1
4.55
|
| Tammeka |
0-1-2
1.20
|
2-0-1
5.79
|
0-2-1
1.60
|
1-2-0
4.11
|
0-2-1
1.50
|
0-0-3
2.21
|
2-0-1
6.17
|
1-0-2
4.32
|
— |
2-0-1
5.05
|
| Tulevik Viljandi |
1-0-2
0.95
|
1-1-1
5.42
|
0-0-3
1.49
|
2-0-1
3.20
|
0-1-2
1.21
|
1-0-2
1.48
|
2-0-1
5.51
|
1-1-1
3.86
|
1-0-2
3.37
|
— |
Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential
Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).
Fit Metrics
| R² | Slope | |
|---|---|---|
| Scored | 0.91 | +9.3 |
| Allowed | 0.77 | -11.1 |
| Differential | 0.95 | +5.7 |
Scoreline Distribution
Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.85% | 7.19% | 7.88% | 4.11% | 3.08% | 1.03% | 30.14% |
| 1 | 7.19% | 6.85% | 5.82% | 5.14% | 2.05% | 1.37% | 28.42% |
| 2 | 7.88% | 5.82% | 4.11% | 1.03% | 1.37% | 0.34% | 20.55% |
| 3 | 4.11% | 5.14% | 1.03% | — | — | — | 10.27% |
| 4 | 3.08% | 2.05% | 1.37% | — | 0.68% | 0.34% | 7.53% |
| 5+ | 1.03% | 1.37% | 0.34% | — | 0.34% | — | 3.08% |
| Total | 30.14% | 28.42% | 20.55% | 10.27% | 7.53% | 3.08% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.49 | 1.49 | +0.00 |
| SD | 1.48 | 1.48 | 2.28 |
| CV | 0.99 | 0.99 | — |
| Max | 8 | 8 | +7 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -7 |
Games Played: 146
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.90% | — | — | — | — | — | 6.90% |
| 1 | 10.34% | — | 3.45% | — | — | — | 13.79% |
| 2 | 3.45% | 13.79% | — | — | — | — | 17.24% |
| 3 | 17.24% | 24.14% | 3.45% | — | — | — | 44.83% |
| 4 | 10.34% | 3.45% | — | — | — | — | 13.79% |
| 5+ | — | 3.45% | — | — | — | — | 3.45% |
| Total | 48.28% | 44.83% | 6.90% | — | — | — | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.62 | 0.59 | +2.03 |
| SD | 1.40 | 0.63 | 1.45 |
| CV | 0.53 | 1.07 | — |
| Max | 7 | 2 | +6 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -1 |
Games Played: 29
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.67% | 13.33% | 6.67% | 6.67% | 10.00% | 3.33% | 46.67% |
| 1 | 3.33% | 13.33% | — | — | — | 3.33% | 20.00% |
| 2 | 3.33% | 3.33% | 10.00% | — | 6.67% | 3.33% | 26.67% |
| 3 | 3.33% | — | 3.33% | — | — | — | 6.67% |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 16.67% | 30.00% | 20.00% | 6.67% | 16.67% | 10.00% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.93 | 2.10 | -1.17 |
| SD | 1.01 | 1.71 | 2.02 |
| CV | 1.09 | 0.81 | — |
| Max | 3 | 6 | +3 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -5 |
Games Played: 30
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | 3.45% | 6.90% | — | 3.45% | — | 13.79% |
| 1 | 3.45% | 6.90% | — | 3.45% | — | — | 13.79% |
| 2 | 10.34% | 10.34% | 10.34% | — | 3.45% | — | 34.48% |
| 3 | 6.90% | 3.45% | 3.45% | — | — | — | 13.79% |
| 4 | 10.34% | 3.45% | — | — | 3.45% | — | 17.24% |
| 5+ | — | 6.90% | — | — | — | — | 6.90% |
| Total | 31.03% | 34.48% | 20.69% | 3.45% | 10.34% | — | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.28 | 1.28 | +1.00 |
| SD | 1.46 | 1.25 | 2.17 |
| CV | 0.64 | 0.98 | — |
| Max | 5 | 4 | +4 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -4 |
Games Played: 29
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10.00% | 10.00% | 3.33% | 6.67% | — | — | 30.00% |
| 1 | 13.33% | 6.67% | 16.67% | 6.67% | 3.33% | — | 46.67% |
| 2 | 3.33% | — | 3.33% | 6.67% | 3.33% | — | 16.67% |
| 3 | 3.33% | — | — | — | — | — | 3.33% |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | 3.33% | — | 3.33% |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 30.00% | 16.67% | 23.33% | 20.00% | 10.00% | — | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.03 | 1.63 | -0.60 |
| SD | 0.96 | 1.38 | 1.43 |
| CV | 0.93 | 0.84 | — |
| Max | 4 | 4 | +3 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -3 |
Games Played: 30
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10.00% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.33% | — | — | 20.00% |
| 1 | 10.00% | 13.33% | 13.33% | 3.33% | — | — | 40.00% |
| 2 | 13.33% | 3.33% | — | — | — | — | 16.67% |
| 3 | 3.33% | 3.33% | — | — | — | — | 6.67% |
| 4 | 3.33% | 3.33% | — | — | — | 3.33% | 10.00% |
| 5+ | 6.67% | — | — | — | — | — | 6.67% |
| Total | 46.67% | 26.67% | 16.67% | 6.67% | — | 3.33% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.73 | 1.03 | +0.70 |
| SD | 1.66 | 1.47 | 2.25 |
| CV | 0.96 | 1.43 | — |
| Max | 6 | 7 | +6 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -3 |
Games Played: 30
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | 6.67% | — | — | — | — | 6.67% |
| 1 | 6.67% | — | 3.33% | 10.00% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 26.67% |
| 2 | 13.33% | 3.33% | 3.33% | — | — | — | 20.00% |
| 3 | 6.67% | 10.00% | — | — | — | — | 16.67% |
| 4 | 6.67% | 6.67% | 6.67% | — | — | — | 20.00% |
| 5+ | — | 3.33% | 3.33% | — | 3.33% | — | 10.00% |
| Total | 33.33% | 30.00% | 16.67% | 10.00% | 6.67% | 3.33% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.67 | 1.43 | +1.23 |
| SD | 1.94 | 1.61 | 2.60 |
| CV | 0.73 | 1.12 | — |
| Max | 8 | 7 | +7 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -6 |
Games Played: 30
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3.33% | 3.33% | 20.00% | 10.00% | 13.33% | — | 50.00% |
| 1 | 10.00% | 10.00% | 6.67% | — | 10.00% | 3.33% | 40.00% |
| 2 | 3.33% | — | 3.33% | — | — | — | 6.67% |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | — | 3.33% | — | — | — | — | 3.33% |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 16.67% | 16.67% | 30.00% | 10.00% | 23.33% | 3.33% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.67 | 2.27 | -1.60 |
| SD | 0.88 | 1.76 | 2.14 |
| CV | 1.33 | 0.78 | — |
| Max | 4 | 8 | +3 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -7 |
Games Played: 30
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 13.33% | 13.33% | 16.67% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 53.33% |
| 1 | — | 6.67% | 3.33% | 6.67% | — | — | 16.67% |
| 2 | 10.00% | 6.67% | 3.33% | — | — | — | 20.00% |
| 3 | — | 10.00% | — | — | — | — | 10.00% |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 23.33% | 36.67% | 23.33% | 10.00% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.87 | 1.47 | -0.60 |
| SD | 1.07 | 1.36 | 1.94 |
| CV | 1.24 | 0.93 | — |
| Max | 3 | 6 | +2 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -6 |
Games Played: 30
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 11.11% | 3.70% | 14.81% | 3.70% | — | — | 33.33% |
| 1 | 11.11% | 7.41% | 3.70% | 14.81% | — | — | 37.04% |
| 2 | 3.70% | 7.41% | 7.41% | 3.70% | — | — | 22.22% |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | — | — | 7.41% | — | — | — | 7.41% |
| 5+ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 25.93% | 18.52% | 33.33% | 22.22% | — | — | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.11 | 1.52 | -0.41 |
| SD | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.47 |
| CV | 1.01 | 0.74 | — |
| Max | 4 | 3 | +2 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -3 |
Games Played: 27
| ↓ Scored | Allowed → | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7.41% | 14.81% | 7.41% | 7.41% | — | 3.70% | 40.74% |
| 1 | 3.70% | 3.70% | 7.41% | 7.41% | 3.70% | 3.70% | 29.63% |
| 2 | 14.81% | 11.11% | — | — | — | — | 25.93% |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5+ | 3.70% | — | — | — | — | — | 3.70% |
| Total | 29.63% | 29.63% | 14.81% | 14.81% | 3.70% | 7.41% | 100% |
Summary Statistics
| Scored | Allowed | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.00 | 1.59 | -0.59 |
| SD | 1.14 | 1.62 | 2.29 |
| CV | 1.14 | 1.02 | — |
| Max | 5 | 6 | +5 |
| Min | 0 | 0 | -6 |
Games Played: 27
Season Summary
Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).
| Team | Elo | Points | Avg | Luck | Percentile | Min | 5th | Q1 | Median | Q3 | 95th | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flora | 1536 | 74 | 62.49 | +11.51 | 97.0% | 46 | 53 | 59 | 62 | 67 | 73 | 77 |
| Levadia | 1354 | 53 | 54.53 | -1.53 | 46.0% | 37 | 44 | 50 | 54 | 59 | 65 | 68 |
| Paide Linnameeskond | 1338 | 60 | 49.80 | +10.20 | 95.0% | 35 | 41 | 45 | 50 | 54 | 59 | 66 |
| Nomme Kalju | 1257 | 49 | 55.15 | -6.15 | 16.0% | 42 | 45 | 52 | 55 | 59 | 64 | 70 |
| Tallinna Legion | 1049 | 25 | 30.32 | -5.32 | 20.0% | 14 | 21 | 26 | 30 | 34 | 41 | 45 |
| Tammeka | 1031 | 31 | 31.95 | -0.95 | 53.0% | 16 | 23 | 28 | 31 | 36 | 43 | 46 |
| Narva Trans | 977 | 21 | 33.09 | -12.09 | 3.0% | 18 | 25 | 29 | 33 | 37 | 42 | 49 |
| Tulevik Viljandi | 965 | 30 | 26.43 | +3.57 | 74.0% | 14 | 17 | 22 | 25 | 31 | 37 | 40 |
| Tallinna Kalev | 878 | 18 | 18.46 | -0.46 | 54.0% | 7 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 22 | 28 | 37 |
| Kuressaare | 868 | 20 | 18.64 | +1.36 | 64.0% | 7 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 22 | 27 | 28 |
Point Totals in Context
How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).
Home-Field Advantage Edge
The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.
Season Trends
How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.
Edges & Scoring
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Home Edge
- Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.No Edge: under 1% * Slight Edge: 1% to 4.5% * Clear Edge: 4.5% to 7.5% * Strong Edge: 7.5% and up.
- Elo Value
- Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
- Scoring Tilt
- Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Title Race
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Title-Race Openness
- Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
- Champion Preseason Odds
- Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 5th * Longshot: 6th or lower.
- Title Margin
- Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.Photo Finish: under 0.1 * Tight Race: 0.1 to 0.19 * Comfortable: 0.19 to 0.38 * Runaway: 0.38 and up.
Simulation-Based Surprises
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Luck Spread
- Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.As Expected: under 4.68 * Some Luck: 4.68 to 7.02 * Lucky: 7.02 to 9.36 * Wild Swing: 9.36 and up.
- Average Finish Error
- Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.Pinpoint: under 0.68 * Close: 0.68 to 1.01 * Off: 1.01 to 1.35 * Way Off: 1.35 and up.
- Biggest Overachiever
- The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 10 typically lands.
- Biggest Underachiever
- The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 10 typically lands.
- Season Outliers
- Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.Minimal Outliers: under 10 * As Expected: 10 to 16 * Several Outliers: 16 to 22 * Many Outliers: 22 and up.
Parity
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Gini Index
- How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.Balanced: under 0.27 * Even: 0.27 to 0.29 * Top-Heavy: 0.29 to 0.31 * Lopsided: 0.31 and up.
- Noll-Scully
- Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.Coin-Flip Parity: under 2.7 * Moderate Separation: 2.7 to 3 * Strong Separation: 3 to 3.3 * Wide Separation: 3.3 and up.
- Interquartile Edge
- Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.Even: under 87.5% * Slight Edge: 87.5% to 91% * Clear Edge: 91% to 93.5% * Wide Edge: 93.5% and up.
- Best vs. Worst
- Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.Even: under 98% * Clear Edge: 98% to 99% * Strong Edge: 99% to 99.5% * Dominant: 99.5% and up.
- Close Games
- Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.Few: under 43% * Some Drama: 43% to 46% * Frequent: 46% to 50.5% * Very Frequent: 50.5% and up.
- Blowouts
- Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.Rare: under 28.5% * Occasional: 28.5% to 34% * Frequent: 34% to 39.5% * Very Frequent: 39.5% and up.
Predictability
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Brier Score
- How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
- Matchup Imbalance
- How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.Very Even: under 0.54 * Slight Separation: 0.54 to 0.58 * Notable Separation: 0.58 to 0.63 * Lopsided: 0.63 and up.
- Strangeness
- How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
- Repeatability
- How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.Weak Carryover: under 0.7 * Some Carryover: 0.7 to 0.84 * Strong Carryover: 0.84 to 0.9 * Near-Lock: 0.9 and up.
- Upset Rate
- Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.Chalky: under 12% * As Expected: 12% to 15% * Upset-Prone: 15% to 19% * Very Upset-Prone: 19% and up.
- Clear Favorite Upset Rate
- Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.Solid Favorites: under 9% * As Expected: 9% to 11% * Shaky Favorites: 11% to 16% * Very Shaky: 16% and up.
Calibration
How these are measured
The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.
- Probability calibration
- An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
- Calibration slope
- Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
- Calibration error (ECE)
- The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.19 * Above Noise: 0.19 to 0.25 * Well Above Noise: 0.25 and up.
Elo Progression Through The Playoffs
How each team's Elo rating moved through the playoff games. Game 0 is the starting Elo just before the first game; each later point is the post-game Elo after that fixture. Steep upward moves are wins over higher-rated opponents; sharp drops are losses to lower-rated opponents.
Final Table Odds
Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flora | 65.00% | 25.00% | 8.00% | 2.00% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Paide Linnameeskond | 4.00% | 17.00% | 22.00% | 48.00% | 8.00% | 1.00% | — | — | — | — |
| Levadia | 17.00% | 23.00% | 38.00% | 22.00% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Nomme Kalju | 14.00% | 35.00% | 31.00% | 19.00% | 1.00% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tammeka | — | — | — | 5.00% | 33.00% | 23.00% | 21.00% | 14.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% |
| Tulevik Viljandi | — | — | — | — | 8.00% | 15.00% | 19.00% | 32.00% | 24.00% | 2.00% |
| Tallinna Legion | — | — | 1.00% | 1.00% | 20.00% | 24.00% | 26.00% | 22.00% | 5.00% | 1.00% |
| Narva Trans | — | — | — | 2.00% | 30.00% | 36.00% | 27.00% | 3.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| Kuressaare | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.00% | 16.00% | 39.00% | 43.00% |
| Tallinna Kalev | — | — | — | 1.00% | — | 1.00% | 5.00% | 13.00% | 29.00% | 51.00% |
Points Required Per Position
The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.
Next-Season Status
Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.
| Team | Same level | Qualified for relegation playoff final | Lost relegation playoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flora | 100% | — | — |
| Levadia | 100% | — | — |
| Narva Trans | 99.00% | 1.00% | — |
| Nomme Kalju | 100% | — | — |
| Paide Linnameeskond | 100% | — | — |
| Tallinna Legion | 96.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% |
| Tammeka | 95.00% | 3.00% | 2.00% |
| Tulevik Viljandi | 73.00% | 22.00% | 5.00% |
| Tallinna Kalev | 17.00% | 43.00% | 40.00% |
| Kuressaare | 20.00% | 29.00% | 51.00% |
Actual Promotion/Relegation Outcomes
Across 100,000 simulations that fixed the regular-season standings and projected only the promotion/relegation playoff, each participating team's chance of going up versus staying at this level.
| Team | Same level | Qualified for relegation playoff final | Lost relegation playoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flora | 100% | — | — |
| Levadia | 100% | — | — |
| Nomme Kalju | 100% | — | — |
| Paide Linnameeskond | 100% | — | — |
| Tallinna Legion | 95.88% | 3.62% | 0.50% |
| Narva Trans | 68.87% | 22.47% | 8.66% |
| Kuressaare | 21.76% | 42.44% | 35.80% |
| Tallinna Kalev | 13.49% | 31.47% | 55.04% |
Overall Game Log
Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Excitement | Pre Elo | Opp Elo | Win % | Tie % | Loss % | Proj. Margin | Elo Δ | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-06 | Tallinna Legion | W 3-1 | 36.4 | 1355 | 1102 | 68.64% | 17.95% | 13.41% | +1.28 | +8.0 | 3 |
| 2020-03-06 | @ Flora | L 1-3 | 36.4 | 1102 | 1355 | 13.41% | 17.95% | 68.64% | -1.28 | -8.1 | 0 |
| 2020-03-07 | Kuressaare | W 1-0 | 30.4 | 1302 | 875 | 79.01% | 15.34% | 5.65% | +2.21 | +2.0 | 3 |
| 2020-03-07 | @ Levadia | L 0-1 | 30.4 | 875 | 1302 | 5.65% | 15.34% | 79.01% | -2.21 | -2.1 | 0 |
| 2020-03-07 | Nomme Kalju | L 0-1 | 35.6 | 1117 | 1300 | 18.63% | 18.72% | 62.65% | -1.04 | -6.7 | 0 |
| 2020-03-07 | @ Narva Trans | W 1-0 | 35.6 | 1300 | 1117 | 62.65% | 18.72% | 18.63% | +1.04 | +6.7 | 3 |
| 2020-03-07 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 1-8 | 28.4 | 931 | 1234 | 10.49% | 17.29% | 72.22% | -1.67 | -19.3 | 0 |
| 2020-03-07 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 8-1 | 28.4 | 1234 | 931 | 72.22% | 17.29% | 10.49% | +1.67 | +19.3 | 3 |
| 2020-03-08 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 2-1 | 40.9 | 1104 | 933 | 61.35% | 18.84% | 19.81% | +0.84 | +6.7 | 3 |
| 2020-03-08 | @ Tammeka | L 1-2 | 40.9 | 933 | 1104 | 19.81% | 18.84% | 61.35% | -0.84 | -6.7 | 0 |
| 2020-05-19 | Levadia | L 0-2 | 31.9 | 1094 | 1304 | 16.41% | 18.44% | 65.15% | -1.18 | -11.3 | 0 |
| 2020-05-19 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 2-0 | 31.9 | 1304 | 1094 | 65.15% | 18.44% | 16.41% | +1.18 | +11.3 | 6 |
| 2020-05-19 | Nomme Kalju | L 0-2 | 27.4 | 873 | 1307 | 5.45% | 15.22% | 79.33% | -2.37 | -3.7 | 0 |
| 2020-05-19 | @ Kuressaare | W 2-0 | 27.4 | 1307 | 873 | 79.33% | 15.22% | 5.45% | +2.37 | +3.7 | 6 |
| 2020-05-19 | Tulevik Viljandi | L 1-2 | 56.5 | 1254 | 927 | 73.73% | 16.94% | 9.33% | +1.67 | -21.3 | 3 |
| 2020-05-19 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | W 2-1 | 56.5 | 927 | 1254 | 9.33% | 16.94% | 73.73% | -1.67 | +21.3 | 3 |
| 2020-05-20 | Narva Trans | D 1-1 | 55.4 | 912 | 1110 | 17.37% | 18.57% | 64.06% | -1.12 | +3.5 | 1 |
| 2020-05-20 | @ Tallinna Kalev | D 1-1 | 55.4 | 1110 | 912 | 64.06% | 18.57% | 17.37% | +1.12 | -3.5 | 1 |
| 2020-05-20 | Tammeka | D 0-0 | 51.7 | 1363 | 1110 | 68.60% | 17.96% | 13.44% | +1.28 | -4.7 | 4 |
| 2020-05-20 | @ Flora | D 0-0 | 51.7 | 1110 | 1363 | 13.44% | 17.96% | 68.60% | -1.28 | +4.7 | 4 |
| 2020-05-23 | Kuressaare | W 2-0 | 28.5 | 1232 | 869 | 75.81% | 16.39% | 7.80% | +1.87 | +5.4 | 6 |
| 2020-05-23 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-2 | 28.5 | 869 | 1232 | 7.80% | 16.39% | 75.81% | -1.87 | -5.4 | 0 |
| 2020-05-23 | Tallinna Legion | L 1-2 | 55.0 | 1311 | 1082 | 66.69% | 18.24% | 15.06% | +1.15 | -19.4 | 6 |
| 2020-05-23 | @ Nomme Kalju | W 2-1 | 55.0 | 1082 | 1311 | 15.06% | 18.24% | 66.69% | -1.15 | +19.4 | 3 |
| 2020-05-24 | Flora | L 2-3 | 44.1 | 1107 | 1358 | 13.52% | 17.98% | 68.51% | -1.40 | -4.5 | 1 |
| 2020-05-24 | @ Narva Trans | W 3-2 | 44.1 | 1358 | 1107 | 68.51% | 17.98% | 13.52% | +1.40 | +4.4 | 7 |
| 2020-05-24 | Levadia | L 1-3 | 33.9 | 948 | 1315 | 7.62% | 16.32% | 76.06% | -2.02 | -4.6 | 3 |
| 2020-05-24 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | W 3-1 | 33.9 | 1315 | 948 | 76.06% | 16.32% | 7.62% | +2.02 | +4.6 | 9 |
| 2020-05-24 | Tallinna Kalev | L 0-2 | 46.0 | 1115 | 915 | 64.16% | 18.56% | 17.28% | +1.00 | -37.3 | 4 |
| 2020-05-24 | @ Tammeka | W 2-0 | 46.0 | 915 | 1115 | 17.28% | 18.56% | 64.16% | -1.00 | +37.3 | 4 |
| 2020-05-30 | Narva Trans | W 3-2 | 60.0 | 864 | 1102 | 14.37% | 18.13% | 67.51% | -1.33 | +18.6 | 3 |
| 2020-05-30 | @ Kuressaare | L 2-3 | 60.0 | 1102 | 864 | 67.51% | 18.13% | 14.37% | +1.33 | -18.6 | 1 |
| 2020-05-30 | Tallinna Kalev | W 3-0 | 25.6 | 1362 | 953 | 78.20% | 15.63% | 6.17% | +2.12 | +6.2 | 10 |
| 2020-05-30 | @ Flora | L 0-3 | 25.6 | 953 | 1362 | 6.17% | 15.63% | 78.20% | -2.12 | -6.2 | 4 |
| 2020-05-30 | Tammeka | L 0-1 | 43.1 | 1102 | 1078 | 43.63% | 19.60% | 36.77% | +0.07 | -13.9 | 3 |
| 2020-05-30 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 1-0 | 43.1 | 1078 | 1102 | 36.77% | 19.60% | 43.63% | -0.07 | +13.9 | 7 |
| 2020-05-31 | Nomme Kalju | L 0-6 | 25.9 | 943 | 1292 | 8.39% | 16.62% | 74.99% | -1.91 | -16.2 | 3 |
| 2020-05-31 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | W 6-0 | 25.9 | 1292 | 943 | 74.99% | 16.62% | 8.39% | +1.91 | +16.2 | 9 |
| 2020-05-31 | Paide Linnameeskond | W 4-1 | 39.3 | 1320 | 1238 | 51.41% | 19.43% | 29.16% | +0.38 | +23.1 | 12 |
| 2020-05-31 | @ Levadia | L 1-4 | 39.3 | 1238 | 1320 | 29.16% | 19.43% | 51.41% | -0.38 | -23.1 | 6 |
| 2020-06-02 | Kuressaare | L 1-2 | 54.3 | 1091 | 882 | 65.01% | 18.46% | 16.53% | +1.05 | -18.9 | 7 |
| 2020-06-02 | @ Tammeka | W 2-1 | 54.3 | 882 | 1091 | 16.53% | 18.46% | 65.01% | -1.05 | +18.9 | 6 |
| 2020-06-02 | Tallinna Legion | W 1-0 | 47.3 | 946 | 1088 | 22.58% | 19.07% | 58.34% | -0.82 | +18.1 | 7 |
| 2020-06-02 | @ Tallinna Kalev | L 0-1 | 47.3 | 1088 | 946 | 58.34% | 19.07% | 22.58% | +0.82 | -18.1 | 3 |
| 2020-06-03 | Flora | L 1-3 | 39.6 | 1215 | 1369 | 21.34% | 18.98% | 59.69% | -0.88 | -12.4 | 6 |
| 2020-06-03 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | W 3-1 | 39.6 | 1369 | 1215 | 59.69% | 18.98% | 21.34% | +0.88 | +12.4 | 13 |
| 2020-06-03 | Levadia | W 2-0 | 42.0 | 1308 | 1343 | 35.24% | 19.58% | 45.18% | -0.25 | +27.1 | 12 |
| 2020-06-03 | @ Nomme Kalju | L 0-2 | 42.0 | 1343 | 1308 | 45.18% | 19.58% | 35.24% | +0.25 | -27.1 | 12 |
| 2020-06-03 | Tulevik Viljandi | L 0-2 | 44.9 | 1084 | 927 | 59.96% | 18.95% | 21.09% | +0.77 | -35.0 | 1 |
| 2020-06-03 | @ Narva Trans | W 2-0 | 44.9 | 927 | 1084 | 21.09% | 18.95% | 59.96% | -0.77 | +34.9 | 6 |
| 2020-06-06 | Narva Trans | D 0-0 | 50.8 | 1070 | 1049 | 43.18% | 19.60% | 37.22% | +0.05 | -0.5 | 4 |
| 2020-06-06 | @ Tallinna Legion | D 0-0 | 50.8 | 1049 | 1070 | 37.22% | 19.60% | 43.18% | -0.05 | +0.5 | 2 |
| 2020-06-06 | Tallinna Kalev | W 4-0 | 25.5 | 1316 | 964 | 75.18% | 16.57% | 8.25% | +1.81 | +10.9 | 15 |
| 2020-06-06 | @ Levadia | L 0-4 | 25.5 | 964 | 1316 | 8.25% | 16.57% | 75.18% | -1.81 | -10.9 | 7 |
| 2020-06-07 | Flora | L 1-2 | 47.4 | 1335 | 1381 | 33.80% | 19.56% | 46.65% | -0.31 | -10.7 | 12 |
| 2020-06-07 | @ Nomme Kalju | W 2-1 | 47.4 | 1381 | 1335 | 46.65% | 19.56% | 33.80% | +0.31 | +10.7 | 16 |
| 2020-06-07 | Kuressaare | W 5-0 | 33.3 | 962 | 901 | 48.61% | 19.51% | 31.88% | +0.26 | +47.5 | 9 |
| 2020-06-07 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | L 0-5 | 33.3 | 901 | 962 | 31.88% | 19.51% | 48.61% | -0.26 | -47.5 | 6 |
| 2020-06-07 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-2 | 34.2 | 1073 | 1202 | 23.82% | 19.16% | 57.02% | -0.75 | -15.8 | 7 |
| 2020-06-07 | @ Tammeka | W 2-0 | 34.2 | 1202 | 1073 | 57.02% | 19.16% | 23.82% | +0.75 | +15.8 | 9 |
| 2020-06-12 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 3-0 | 26.1 | 1392 | 1010 | 76.82% | 16.09% | 7.09% | +1.97 | +7.1 | 19 |
| 2020-06-12 | @ Flora | L 0-3 | 26.1 | 1010 | 1392 | 7.09% | 16.09% | 76.82% | -1.97 | -7.1 | 9 |
| 2020-06-13 | Tallinna Legion | D 0-0 | 51.2 | 854 | 1069 | 16.03% | 18.39% | 65.58% | -1.21 | +4.1 | 7 |
| 2020-06-13 | @ Kuressaare | D 0-0 | 51.2 | 1069 | 854 | 65.58% | 18.39% | 16.03% | +1.21 | -4.1 | 5 |
| 2020-06-13 | Tammeka | D 2-2 | 61.3 | 1327 | 1057 | 69.94% | 17.74% | 12.33% | +1.37 | -3.3 | 16 |
| 2020-06-13 | @ Levadia | D 2-2 | 61.3 | 1057 | 1327 | 12.33% | 17.74% | 69.94% | -1.37 | +3.3 | 8 |
| 2020-06-14 | Narva Trans | W 2-1 | 41.0 | 1218 | 1049 | 61.19% | 18.85% | 19.95% | +0.83 | +6.8 | 12 |
| 2020-06-14 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 1-2 | 41.0 | 1049 | 1218 | 19.95% | 18.85% | 61.19% | -0.83 | -6.7 | 2 |
| 2020-06-14 | Nomme Kalju | L 0-4 | 25.2 | 954 | 1324 | 7.51% | 16.27% | 76.22% | -2.03 | -9.9 | 7 |
| 2020-06-14 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 4-0 | 25.2 | 1324 | 954 | 76.22% | 16.27% | 7.51% | +2.03 | +9.9 | 15 |
| 2020-06-16 | Tulevik Viljandi | L 0-2 | 41.7 | 1065 | 1002 | 48.86% | 19.51% | 31.63% | +0.27 | -29.0 | 5 |
| 2020-06-16 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 2-0 | 41.7 | 1002 | 1065 | 31.63% | 19.51% | 48.86% | -0.27 | +29.0 | 12 |
| 2020-06-17 | Kuressaare | L 0-2 | 42.6 | 944 | 858 | 51.82% | 19.41% | 28.77% | +0.39 | -30.5 | 7 |
| 2020-06-17 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 2-0 | 42.6 | 858 | 944 | 28.77% | 19.41% | 51.82% | -0.39 | +30.5 | 10 |
| 2020-06-17 | Levadia | W 4-0 | 35.0 | 1399 | 1324 | 50.46% | 19.46% | 30.08% | +0.34 | +36.7 | 22 |
| 2020-06-17 | @ Flora | L 0-4 | 35.0 | 1324 | 1399 | 30.08% | 19.46% | 50.46% | -0.34 | -36.7 | 16 |
| 2020-06-17 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-1 | 47.0 | 1334 | 1225 | 54.70% | 19.29% | 26.01% | +0.52 | -17.0 | 15 |
| 2020-06-17 | @ Nomme Kalju | W 1-0 | 47.0 | 1225 | 1334 | 26.01% | 19.29% | 54.70% | -0.52 | +17.0 | 15 |
| 2020-06-17 | Tammeka | L 0-1 | 41.3 | 1042 | 1060 | 37.69% | 19.61% | 42.70% | -0.16 | -12.4 | 2 |
| 2020-06-17 | @ Narva Trans | W 1-0 | 41.3 | 1060 | 1042 | 42.70% | 19.61% | 37.69% | +0.16 | +12.4 | 11 |
| 2020-06-26 | Nomme Kalju | L 0-2 | 31.0 | 1072 | 1317 | 13.95% | 18.06% | 67.99% | -1.36 | -9.7 | 11 |
| 2020-06-26 | @ Tammeka | W 2-0 | 31.0 | 1317 | 1072 | 67.99% | 18.06% | 13.95% | +1.36 | +9.7 | 18 |
| 2020-06-27 | Flora | L 0-4 | 22.9 | 888 | 1435 | 3.07% | 13.24% | 83.69% | -2.97 | -3.8 | 10 |
| 2020-06-27 | @ Kuressaare | W 4-0 | 22.9 | 1435 | 888 | 83.69% | 13.24% | 3.07% | +2.97 | +3.8 | 25 |
| 2020-06-27 | Levadia | D 4-4 | 67.1 | 1030 | 1287 | 13.15% | 17.90% | 68.95% | -1.43 | +2.3 | 3 |
| 2020-06-27 | @ Narva Trans | D 4-4 | 67.1 | 1287 | 1030 | 68.95% | 17.90% | 13.15% | +1.43 | -2.3 | 17 |
| 2020-06-27 | Tallinna Kalev | W 2-1 | 42.5 | 1031 | 913 | 55.74% | 19.23% | 25.03% | +0.57 | +8.3 | 15 |
| 2020-06-27 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | L 1-2 | 42.5 | 913 | 1031 | 25.03% | 19.23% | 55.74% | -0.57 | -8.3 | 7 |
| 2020-06-27 | Tallinna Legion | W 2-0 | 31.9 | 1242 | 1036 | 64.69% | 18.50% | 16.81% | +1.03 | +11.5 | 18 |
| 2020-06-27 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-2 | 31.9 | 1036 | 1242 | 16.81% | 18.50% | 64.69% | -1.03 | -11.5 | 5 |
| 2020-06-30 | Narva Trans | W 3-1 | 33.6 | 1439 | 1032 | 78.06% | 15.68% | 6.26% | +2.10 | +3.7 | 28 |
| 2020-06-30 | @ Flora | L 1-3 | 33.6 | 1032 | 1439 | 6.26% | 15.68% | 78.06% | -2.10 | -3.7 | 3 |
| 2020-06-30 | Tallinna Kalev | D 0-0 | 50.9 | 1025 | 905 | 55.91% | 19.22% | 24.86% | +0.57 | -2.5 | 6 |
| 2020-06-30 | @ Tallinna Legion | D 0-0 | 50.9 | 905 | 1025 | 24.86% | 19.22% | 55.91% | -0.57 | +2.5 | 8 |
| 2020-07-01 | Nomme Kalju | D 1-1 | 56.1 | 1285 | 1327 | 34.34% | 19.57% | 46.09% | -0.29 | +0.8 | 18 |
| 2020-07-01 | @ Levadia | D 1-1 | 56.1 | 1327 | 1285 | 46.09% | 19.57% | 34.34% | +0.29 | -0.8 | 19 |
| 2020-07-01 | Tammeka | W 3-0 | 30.1 | 1253 | 1063 | 63.31% | 18.65% | 18.04% | +0.95 | +17.9 | 21 |
| 2020-07-01 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-3 | 30.1 | 1063 | 1253 | 18.04% | 18.65% | 63.31% | -0.95 | -17.9 | 11 |
| 2020-07-01 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 3-0 | 42.6 | 885 | 1040 | 21.24% | 18.97% | 59.80% | -0.89 | +50.6 | 13 |
| 2020-07-01 | @ Kuressaare | L 0-3 | 42.6 | 1040 | 885 | 59.80% | 18.97% | 21.24% | +0.89 | -50.6 | 15 |
| 2020-07-07 | Kuressaare | W 1-0 | 31.0 | 1326 | 935 | 77.26% | 15.95% | 6.79% | +2.01 | +2.5 | 22 |
| 2020-07-07 | @ Nomme Kalju | L 0-1 | 31.0 | 935 | 1326 | 6.79% | 15.95% | 77.26% | -2.01 | -2.5 | 13 |
| 2020-07-08 | Flora | W 2-1 | 58.1 | 989 | 1443 | 4.93% | 14.88% | 80.18% | -2.48 | +22.9 | 18 |
| 2020-07-08 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | L 1-2 | 58.1 | 1443 | 989 | 80.18% | 14.88% | 4.93% | +2.48 | -22.9 | 28 |
| 2020-07-08 | Levadia | L 0-4 | 25.0 | 907 | 1286 | 7.23% | 16.15% | 76.62% | -2.07 | -9.5 | 8 |
| 2020-07-08 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 4-0 | 25.0 | 1286 | 907 | 76.62% | 16.15% | 7.23% | +2.07 | +9.5 | 21 |
| 2020-07-08 | Paide Linnameeskond | W 1-0 | 50.0 | 1029 | 1271 | 14.10% | 18.08% | 67.82% | -1.35 | +20.9 | 6 |
| 2020-07-08 | @ Narva Trans | L 0-1 | 50.0 | 1271 | 1029 | 67.82% | 18.08% | 14.10% | +1.35 | -20.9 | 21 |
| 2020-07-08 | Tallinna Legion | L 1-3 | 45.6 | 1045 | 1022 | 43.42% | 19.60% | 36.98% | +0.06 | -22.7 | 11 |
| 2020-07-08 | @ Tammeka | W 3-1 | 45.6 | 1022 | 1045 | 36.98% | 19.60% | 43.42% | -0.06 | +22.7 | 9 |
| 2020-07-11 | Narva Trans | L 0-1 | 40.5 | 1012 | 1050 | 34.93% | 19.57% | 45.49% | -0.26 | -11.6 | 18 |
| 2020-07-11 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | W 1-0 | 40.5 | 1050 | 1012 | 45.49% | 19.57% | 34.93% | +0.26 | +11.6 | 9 |
| 2020-07-11 | Paide Linnameeskond | W 3-1 | 39.8 | 1420 | 1250 | 61.32% | 18.84% | 19.84% | +0.84 | +11.6 | 31 |
| 2020-07-11 | @ Flora | L 1-3 | 39.8 | 1250 | 1420 | 19.84% | 18.84% | 61.32% | -0.84 | -11.6 | 21 |
| 2020-07-11 | Tammeka | L 2-4 | 45.1 | 933 | 1022 | 28.32% | 19.40% | 52.28% | -0.54 | -14.2 | 13 |
| 2020-07-11 | @ Kuressaare | W 4-2 | 45.1 | 1022 | 933 | 52.28% | 19.40% | 28.32% | +0.54 | +14.2 | 14 |
| 2020-07-12 | Tallinna Kalev | W 2-0 | 27.5 | 1328 | 898 | 79.16% | 15.29% | 5.56% | +2.23 | +3.8 | 25 |
| 2020-07-12 | @ Nomme Kalju | L 0-2 | 27.5 | 898 | 1328 | 5.56% | 15.29% | 79.16% | -2.23 | -3.8 | 8 |
| 2020-07-12 | Tallinna Legion | W 4-0 | 27.5 | 1295 | 1045 | 68.43% | 17.99% | 13.58% | +1.27 | +17.9 | 24 |
| 2020-07-12 | @ Levadia | L 0-4 | 27.5 | 1045 | 1295 | 13.58% | 17.99% | 68.43% | -1.27 | -17.9 | 9 |
| 2020-07-17 | Kuressaare | D 1-1 | 55.1 | 1027 | 919 | 54.59% | 19.29% | 26.12% | +0.51 | -2.0 | 10 |
| 2020-07-17 | @ Tallinna Legion | D 1-1 | 55.1 | 919 | 1027 | 26.12% | 19.29% | 54.59% | -0.51 | +2.0 | 14 |
| 2020-07-17 | Nomme Kalju | L 1-3 | 41.6 | 1239 | 1332 | 27.82% | 19.37% | 52.80% | -0.56 | -15.7 | 21 |
| 2020-07-17 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | W 3-1 | 41.6 | 1332 | 1239 | 52.80% | 19.37% | 27.82% | +0.56 | +15.7 | 28 |
| 2020-07-18 | Flora | L 1-3 | 42.5 | 1313 | 1432 | 24.96% | 19.23% | 55.81% | -0.70 | -14.3 | 24 |
| 2020-07-18 | @ Levadia | W 3-1 | 42.5 | 1432 | 1313 | 55.81% | 19.23% | 24.96% | +0.70 | +14.3 | 34 |
| 2020-07-18 | Narva Trans | D 2-2 | 60.5 | 1036 | 1061 | 36.70% | 19.60% | 43.70% | -0.19 | +0.3 | 15 |
| 2020-07-18 | @ Tammeka | D 2-2 | 60.5 | 1061 | 1036 | 43.70% | 19.60% | 36.70% | +0.19 | -0.4 | 10 |
| 2020-07-18 | Tulevik Viljandi | L 0-2 | 34.9 | 894 | 1000 | 26.37% | 19.31% | 54.32% | -0.63 | -17.3 | 8 |
| 2020-07-18 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 2-0 | 34.9 | 1000 | 894 | 54.32% | 19.31% | 26.37% | +0.63 | +17.3 | 21 |
| 2020-07-24 | Nomme Kalju | W 2-1 | 46.8 | 1446 | 1348 | 53.35% | 19.35% | 27.30% | +0.46 | +8.9 | 37 |
| 2020-07-24 | @ Flora | L 1-2 | 46.8 | 1348 | 1446 | 27.30% | 19.35% | 53.35% | -0.46 | -8.9 | 28 |
| 2020-07-24 | Tammeka | W 2-0 | 40.0 | 1018 | 1037 | 37.46% | 19.60% | 42.93% | -0.17 | +25.9 | 24 |
| 2020-07-24 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | L 0-2 | 40.0 | 1037 | 1018 | 42.93% | 19.60% | 37.46% | +0.17 | -25.9 | 15 |
| 2020-07-25 | Levadia | W 4-2 | 52.3 | 1223 | 1299 | 29.99% | 19.46% | 50.55% | -0.47 | +23.1 | 24 |
| 2020-07-25 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 2-4 | 52.3 | 1299 | 1223 | 50.55% | 19.46% | 29.99% | +0.47 | -23.1 | 24 |
| 2020-07-25 | Tallinna Legion | W 2-0 | 37.6 | 1061 | 1025 | 45.25% | 19.58% | 35.17% | +0.13 | +22.0 | 13 |
| 2020-07-25 | @ Narva Trans | L 0-2 | 37.6 | 1025 | 1061 | 35.17% | 19.58% | 45.25% | -0.13 | -22.1 | 10 |
| 2020-07-27 | Tallinna Kalev | D 2-2 | 60.5 | 921 | 877 | 46.33% | 19.56% | 34.11% | +0.17 | -0.6 | 15 |
| 2020-07-27 | @ Kuressaare | D 2-2 | 60.5 | 877 | 921 | 34.11% | 19.56% | 46.33% | -0.17 | +0.6 | 9 |
| 2020-07-31 | Flora | L 0-3 | 23.7 | 877 | 1455 | 2.62% | 12.69% | 84.68% | -3.13 | -2.5 | 9 |
| 2020-07-31 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 3-0 | 23.7 | 1455 | 877 | 84.68% | 12.69% | 2.62% | +3.13 | +2.5 | 40 |
| 2020-07-31 | Tammeka | D 1-1 | 56.0 | 1339 | 1011 | 73.80% | 16.93% | 9.28% | +1.68 | -5.0 | 29 |
| 2020-07-31 | @ Nomme Kalju | D 1-1 | 56.0 | 1011 | 1339 | 9.28% | 16.93% | 73.80% | -1.68 | +5.0 | 16 |
| 2020-08-01 | Kuressaare | W 1-0 | 35.9 | 1083 | 920 | 60.61% | 18.90% | 20.49% | +0.80 | +7.3 | 16 |
| 2020-08-01 | @ Narva Trans | L 0-1 | 35.9 | 920 | 1083 | 20.49% | 18.90% | 60.61% | -0.80 | -7.3 | 15 |
| 2020-08-01 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-3 | 28.6 | 1003 | 1246 | 14.05% | 18.07% | 67.87% | -1.36 | -14.1 | 10 |
| 2020-08-01 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 3-0 | 28.6 | 1246 | 1003 | 67.87% | 18.07% | 14.05% | +1.36 | +14.1 | 27 |
| 2020-08-02 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 5-1 | 32.0 | 1275 | 1044 | 66.97% | 18.21% | 14.82% | +1.17 | +16.2 | 27 |
| 2020-08-02 | @ Levadia | L 1-5 | 32.0 | 1044 | 1275 | 14.82% | 18.21% | 66.97% | -1.17 | -16.2 | 24 |
| 2020-08-07 | Kuressaare | W 3-0 | 24.0 | 1457 | 913 | 83.62% | 13.28% | 3.10% | +2.83 | +3.0 | 43 |
| 2020-08-07 | @ Flora | L 0-3 | 24.0 | 913 | 1457 | 3.10% | 13.28% | 83.62% | -2.83 | -3.0 | 15 |
| 2020-08-08 | Tallinna Legion | L 0-2 | 40.8 | 1027 | 989 | 45.62% | 19.57% | 34.81% | +0.14 | -27.3 | 24 |
| 2020-08-08 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | W 2-0 | 40.8 | 989 | 1027 | 34.81% | 19.57% | 45.62% | -0.14 | +27.3 | 13 |
| 2020-08-09 | Levadia | D 1-1 | 55.7 | 1016 | 1292 | 11.99% | 17.66% | 70.35% | -1.53 | +4.4 | 17 |
| 2020-08-09 | @ Tammeka | D 1-1 | 55.7 | 1292 | 1016 | 70.35% | 17.66% | 11.99% | +1.53 | -4.5 | 28 |
| 2020-08-09 | Narva Trans | W 3-0 | 28.8 | 1334 | 1090 | 67.93% | 18.07% | 14.00% | +1.23 | +14.1 | 32 |
| 2020-08-09 | @ Nomme Kalju | L 0-3 | 28.8 | 1090 | 1334 | 14.00% | 18.07% | 67.93% | -1.23 | -14.1 | 16 |
| 2020-08-09 | Tallinna Kalev | W 4-0 | 24.9 | 1260 | 875 | 76.98% | 16.04% | 6.98% | +1.98 | +9.2 | 30 |
| 2020-08-09 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-4 | 24.9 | 875 | 1260 | 6.98% | 16.04% | 76.98% | -1.98 | -9.2 | 9 |
| 2020-08-14 | Flora | L 1-3 | 33.2 | 1020 | 1460 | 5.29% | 15.12% | 79.58% | -2.40 | -3.1 | 17 |
| 2020-08-14 | @ Tammeka | W 3-1 | 33.2 | 1460 | 1020 | 79.58% | 15.12% | 5.29% | +2.40 | +3.1 | 46 |
| 2020-08-14 | Levadia | D 2-2 | 61.6 | 910 | 1287 | 7.25% | 16.16% | 76.59% | -2.07 | +4.0 | 16 |
| 2020-08-14 | @ Kuressaare | D 2-2 | 61.6 | 1287 | 910 | 76.59% | 16.16% | 7.25% | +2.07 | -4.0 | 29 |
| 2020-08-15 | Nomme Kalju | L 0-6 | 26.3 | 1016 | 1348 | 9.10% | 16.87% | 74.03% | -1.83 | -17.6 | 13 |
| 2020-08-15 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 6-0 | 26.3 | 1348 | 1016 | 74.03% | 16.87% | 9.10% | +1.83 | +17.6 | 35 |
| 2020-08-15 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 1-3 | 35.8 | 1000 | 1269 | 12.38% | 17.75% | 69.87% | -1.49 | -7.5 | 24 |
| 2020-08-15 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | W 3-1 | 35.8 | 1269 | 1000 | 69.87% | 17.75% | 12.38% | +1.49 | +7.5 | 33 |
| 2020-08-16 | Tallinna Kalev | W 1-0 | 34.6 | 1076 | 866 | 65.12% | 18.45% | 16.43% | +1.05 | +6.0 | 19 |
| 2020-08-16 | @ Narva Trans | L 0-1 | 34.6 | 866 | 1076 | 16.43% | 18.45% | 65.12% | -1.05 | -6.0 | 9 |
| 2020-08-21 | Narva Trans | W 3-0 | 29.8 | 1283 | 1082 | 64.30% | 18.54% | 17.16% | +1.01 | +17.1 | 32 |
| 2020-08-21 | @ Levadia | L 0-3 | 29.8 | 1082 | 1283 | 17.16% | 18.54% | 64.30% | -1.01 | -17.1 | 19 |
| 2020-08-22 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-4 | 25.2 | 914 | 1277 | 7.79% | 16.39% | 75.81% | -1.99 | -10.3 | 16 |
| 2020-08-22 | @ Kuressaare | W 4-0 | 25.2 | 1277 | 914 | 75.81% | 16.39% | 7.79% | +1.99 | +10.3 | 36 |
| 2020-08-22 | Tammeka | L 0-2 | 33.2 | 860 | 1017 | 21.02% | 18.95% | 60.03% | -0.90 | -14.1 | 9 |
| 2020-08-22 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 2-0 | 33.2 | 1017 | 860 | 60.03% | 18.95% | 21.02% | +0.90 | +14.1 | 20 |
| 2020-08-22 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 1-0 | 31.4 | 1366 | 993 | 76.35% | 16.23% | 7.42% | +1.92 | +2.7 | 38 |
| 2020-08-22 | @ Nomme Kalju | L 0-1 | 31.4 | 993 | 1366 | 7.42% | 16.23% | 76.35% | -1.92 | -2.7 | 24 |
| 2020-08-23 | Flora | L 1-3 | 32.8 | 998 | 1464 | 4.67% | 14.69% | 80.64% | -2.54 | -2.7 | 13 |
| 2020-08-23 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 3-1 | 32.8 | 1464 | 998 | 80.64% | 14.69% | 4.67% | +2.54 | +2.7 | 49 |
| 2020-08-29 | Tallinna Legion | W 1-0 | 30.2 | 1466 | 996 | 80.87% | 14.59% | 4.54% | +2.44 | +1.6 | 52 |
| 2020-08-29 | @ Flora | L 0-1 | 30.2 | 996 | 1466 | 4.54% | 14.59% | 80.87% | -2.44 | -1.6 | 13 |
| 2020-08-30 | Kuressaare | D 0-0 | 51.0 | 1065 | 903 | 60.48% | 18.91% | 20.61% | +0.80 | -3.3 | 20 |
| 2020-08-30 | @ Narva Trans | D 0-0 | 51.0 | 903 | 1065 | 20.61% | 18.91% | 60.48% | -0.80 | +3.3 | 17 |
| 2020-08-30 | Tallinna Kalev | W 3-0 | 24.9 | 1300 | 846 | 80.21% | 14.87% | 4.92% | +2.35 | +4.9 | 35 |
| 2020-08-30 | @ Levadia | L 0-3 | 24.9 | 846 | 1300 | 4.92% | 14.87% | 80.21% | -2.35 | -4.9 | 9 |
| 2020-08-30 | Tammeka | W 3-1 | 36.1 | 1287 | 1031 | 68.85% | 17.92% | 13.23% | +1.30 | +8.0 | 39 |
| 2020-08-30 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 1-3 | 36.1 | 1031 | 1287 | 13.23% | 17.92% | 68.85% | -1.30 | -7.9 | 20 |
| 2020-09-12 | Flora | L 1-4 | 28.2 | 841 | 1468 | 2.03% | 11.81% | 86.16% | -3.40 | -1.6 | 9 |
| 2020-09-12 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 4-1 | 28.2 | 1468 | 841 | 86.16% | 11.81% | 2.03% | +3.40 | +1.6 | 55 |
| 2020-09-12 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 1-4 | 32.4 | 990 | 1295 | 10.39% | 17.26% | 72.35% | -1.69 | -8.9 | 24 |
| 2020-09-12 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | W 4-1 | 32.4 | 1295 | 990 | 72.35% | 17.26% | 10.39% | +1.69 | +8.9 | 42 |
| 2020-09-13 | Levadia | L 1-5 | 28.7 | 907 | 1305 | 6.53% | 15.82% | 77.65% | -2.18 | -7.1 | 17 |
| 2020-09-13 | @ Kuressaare | W 5-1 | 28.7 | 1305 | 907 | 77.65% | 15.82% | 6.53% | +2.18 | +7.1 | 38 |
| 2020-09-13 | Narva Trans | W 2-1 | 50.0 | 994 | 1062 | 31.00% | 19.49% | 49.51% | -0.42 | +14.6 | 16 |
| 2020-09-13 | @ Tallinna Legion | L 1-2 | 50.0 | 1062 | 994 | 49.51% | 19.49% | 31.00% | +0.42 | -14.7 | 20 |
| 2020-09-19 | Tallinna Legion | D 2-2 | 60.6 | 899 | 1009 | 26.03% | 19.29% | 54.69% | -0.64 | +1.5 | 18 |
| 2020-09-19 | @ Kuressaare | D 2-2 | 60.6 | 1009 | 899 | 54.69% | 19.29% | 26.03% | +0.64 | -1.5 | 17 |
| 2020-09-19 | Tammeka | L 1-2 | 40.5 | 839 | 1023 | 18.58% | 18.71% | 62.71% | -1.04 | -6.3 | 9 |
| 2020-09-19 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 2-1 | 40.5 | 1023 | 839 | 62.71% | 18.71% | 18.58% | +1.04 | +6.3 | 23 |
| 2020-09-19 | Tulevik Viljandi | L 0-1 | 44.7 | 1047 | 981 | 49.31% | 19.49% | 31.20% | +0.29 | -15.5 | 20 |
| 2020-09-19 | @ Narva Trans | W 1-0 | 44.7 | 981 | 1047 | 31.20% | 19.49% | 49.31% | -0.29 | +15.5 | 27 |
| 2020-09-20 | Nomme Kalju | W 2-1 | 51.2 | 1312 | 1368 | 32.48% | 19.53% | 47.99% | -0.36 | +14.3 | 41 |
| 2020-09-20 | @ Levadia | L 1-2 | 51.2 | 1368 | 1312 | 47.99% | 19.53% | 32.48% | +0.36 | -14.2 | 38 |
| 2020-09-23 | Nomme Kalju | D 0-0 | 51.8 | 1030 | 1354 | 9.44% | 16.98% | 73.57% | -1.79 | +5.5 | 24 |
| 2020-09-23 | @ Tammeka | D 0-0 | 51.8 | 1354 | 1030 | 73.57% | 16.98% | 9.44% | +1.79 | -5.5 | 39 |
| 2020-09-26 | Kuressaare | D 1-1 | 55.1 | 996 | 901 | 53.02% | 19.37% | 27.61% | +0.44 | -1.8 | 28 |
| 2020-09-26 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | D 1-1 | 55.1 | 901 | 996 | 27.61% | 19.37% | 53.02% | -0.44 | +1.8 | 19 |
| 2020-09-26 | Tallinna Kalev | W 4-1 | 29.8 | 1304 | 833 | 80.88% | 14.59% | 4.53% | +2.44 | +3.8 | 45 |
| 2020-09-26 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 1-4 | 29.8 | 833 | 1304 | 4.53% | 14.59% | 80.88% | -2.44 | -3.8 | 9 |
| 2020-09-27 | Narva Trans | W 2-1 | 37.5 | 1349 | 1032 | 73.11% | 17.09% | 9.80% | +1.62 | +3.4 | 42 |
| 2020-09-27 | @ Nomme Kalju | L 1-2 | 37.5 | 1032 | 1349 | 9.80% | 17.09% | 73.11% | -1.62 | -3.4 | 20 |
| 2020-09-27 | Tammeka | W 3-1 | 45.8 | 1007 | 1035 | 36.25% | 19.59% | 44.16% | -0.21 | +23.0 | 20 |
| 2020-09-27 | @ Tallinna Legion | L 1-3 | 45.8 | 1035 | 1007 | 44.16% | 19.59% | 36.25% | +0.21 | -23.0 | 24 |
| 2020-09-30 | Tulevik Viljandi | D 0-0 | 51.9 | 1352 | 995 | 75.50% | 16.48% | 8.02% | +1.84 | -5.8 | 43 |
| 2020-09-30 | @ Nomme Kalju | D 0-0 | 51.9 | 995 | 1352 | 8.02% | 16.48% | 75.50% | -1.84 | +5.8 | 29 |
| 2020-10-03 | Narva Trans | D 0-0 | 50.8 | 1012 | 1028 | 37.91% | 19.61% | 42.48% | -0.15 | +0.3 | 25 |
| 2020-10-03 | @ Tammeka | D 0-0 | 50.8 | 1028 | 1012 | 42.48% | 19.61% | 37.91% | +0.15 | -0.4 | 21 |
| 2020-10-03 | Tallinna Kalev | L 0-1 | 45.0 | 903 | 829 | 50.29% | 19.47% | 30.24% | +0.33 | -15.8 | 19 |
| 2020-10-03 | @ Kuressaare | W 1-0 | 45.0 | 829 | 903 | 30.24% | 19.47% | 50.29% | -0.33 | +15.8 | 12 |
| 2020-10-04 | Levadia | W 1-0 | 44.1 | 1308 | 1327 | 37.50% | 19.60% | 42.90% | -0.16 | +13.8 | 48 |
| 2020-10-04 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-1 | 44.1 | 1327 | 1308 | 42.90% | 19.60% | 37.50% | +0.16 | -13.8 | 41 |
| 2020-10-04 | Tallinna Legion | D 1-1 | 56.0 | 1346 | 1030 | 73.05% | 17.10% | 9.85% | +1.62 | -4.9 | 44 |
| 2020-10-04 | @ Nomme Kalju | D 1-1 | 56.0 | 1030 | 1346 | 9.85% | 17.10% | 73.05% | -1.62 | +4.8 | 21 |
| 2020-10-04 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 2-1 | 35.4 | 1469 | 1000 | 80.81% | 14.62% | 4.57% | +2.43 | +1.5 | 58 |
| 2020-10-04 | @ Flora | L 1-2 | 35.4 | 1000 | 1469 | 4.57% | 14.62% | 80.81% | -2.43 | -1.5 | 29 |
| 2020-10-17 | Nomme Kalju | L 1-4 | 29.5 | 845 | 1341 | 3.98% | 14.14% | 81.89% | -2.70 | -3.3 | 12 |
| 2020-10-17 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 4-1 | 29.5 | 1341 | 845 | 81.89% | 14.14% | 3.98% | +2.70 | +3.3 | 47 |
| 2020-10-17 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 2-0 | 29.4 | 1313 | 999 | 72.91% | 17.14% | 9.95% | +1.61 | +6.9 | 44 |
| 2020-10-17 | @ Levadia | L 0-2 | 29.4 | 999 | 1313 | 9.95% | 17.14% | 72.91% | -1.61 | -6.9 | 29 |
| 2020-10-18 | Kuressaare | W 4-2 | 43.8 | 1013 | 887 | 56.57% | 19.19% | 24.25% | +0.60 | +12.5 | 28 |
| 2020-10-18 | @ Tammeka | L 2-4 | 43.8 | 887 | 1013 | 24.25% | 19.19% | 56.57% | -0.60 | -12.4 | 19 |
| 2020-10-18 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 0-2 | 30.0 | 1035 | 1321 | 11.40% | 17.52% | 71.08% | -1.58 | -7.9 | 21 |
| 2020-10-18 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 2-0 | 30.0 | 1321 | 1035 | 71.08% | 17.52% | 11.40% | +1.58 | +7.9 | 51 |
| 2020-10-21 | Flora | L 1-2 | 35.8 | 1028 | 1471 | 5.21% | 15.07% | 79.72% | -2.42 | -1.8 | 21 |
| 2020-10-21 | @ Narva Trans | W 2-1 | 35.8 | 1471 | 1028 | 79.72% | 15.07% | 5.21% | +2.42 | +1.8 | 61 |
| 2020-10-24 | Tallinna Kalev | W 2-0 | 32.3 | 1027 | 842 | 62.84% | 18.70% | 18.46% | +0.92 | +12.6 | 24 |
| 2020-10-24 | @ Tallinna Legion | L 0-2 | 32.3 | 842 | 1027 | 18.46% | 18.70% | 62.84% | -0.92 | -12.6 | 12 |
| 2020-10-24 | Tammeka | L 0-1 | 40.7 | 992 | 1025 | 35.56% | 19.58% | 44.85% | -0.24 | -11.8 | 29 |
| 2020-10-24 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | W 1-0 | 40.7 | 1025 | 992 | 44.85% | 19.58% | 35.56% | +0.24 | +11.8 | 31 |
| 2020-10-25 | Flora | L 0-4 | 22.5 | 875 | 1473 | 2.36% | 12.32% | 85.32% | -3.24 | -2.9 | 19 |
| 2020-10-25 | @ Kuressaare | W 4-0 | 22.5 | 1473 | 875 | 85.32% | 12.32% | 2.36% | +3.24 | +2.9 | 64 |
| 2020-10-25 | Levadia | L 1-2 | 37.9 | 1026 | 1320 | 10.99% | 17.42% | 71.59% | -1.62 | -3.8 | 21 |
| 2020-10-25 | @ Narva Trans | W 2-1 | 37.9 | 1320 | 1026 | 71.59% | 17.42% | 10.99% | +1.62 | +3.8 | 47 |
| 2020-10-25 | Paide Linnameeskond | L 1-3 | 46.9 | 1345 | 1329 | 42.39% | 19.61% | 38.00% | +0.02 | -22.2 | 47 |
| 2020-10-25 | @ Nomme Kalju | W 3-1 | 46.9 | 1329 | 1345 | 38.00% | 19.61% | 42.39% | -0.02 | +22.2 | 54 |
| 2020-10-28 | Paide Linnameeskond | W 1-0 | 41.5 | 1476 | 1351 | 56.43% | 19.20% | 24.38% | +0.60 | +8.6 | 67 |
| 2020-10-28 | @ Flora | L 0-1 | 41.5 | 1351 | 1476 | 24.38% | 19.20% | 56.43% | -0.60 | -8.6 | 54 |
| 2020-10-31 | Narva Trans | W 4-1 | 48.6 | 829 | 1022 | 17.81% | 18.62% | 63.57% | -1.09 | +45.3 | 15 |
| 2020-10-31 | @ Tallinna Kalev | L 1-4 | 48.6 | 1022 | 829 | 63.57% | 18.62% | 17.81% | +1.09 | -45.3 | 21 |
| 2020-10-31 | Tallinna Legion | D 0-0 | 50.8 | 980 | 1040 | 32.04% | 19.52% | 48.44% | -0.38 | +1.3 | 30 |
| 2020-10-31 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | D 0-0 | 50.8 | 1040 | 980 | 48.44% | 19.52% | 32.04% | +0.38 | -1.3 | 25 |
| 2020-10-31 | Tammeka | W 3-2 | 43.1 | 1324 | 1037 | 71.12% | 17.52% | 11.37% | +1.46 | +3.8 | 50 |
| 2020-10-31 | @ Levadia | L 2-3 | 43.1 | 1037 | 1324 | 11.37% | 17.52% | 71.12% | -1.46 | -3.8 | 31 |
| 2020-11-01 | Kuressaare | W 6-2 | 29.7 | 1343 | 872 | 80.89% | 14.58% | 4.52% | +2.44 | +4.1 | 57 |
| 2020-11-01 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 2-6 | 29.7 | 872 | 1343 | 4.52% | 14.58% | 80.89% | -2.44 | -4.1 | 19 |
| 2020-11-01 | Nomme Kalju | D 0-0 | 54.8 | 1484 | 1322 | 60.50% | 18.91% | 20.59% | +0.80 | -3.3 | 68 |
| 2020-11-01 | @ Flora | D 0-0 | 54.8 | 1322 | 1484 | 20.59% | 18.91% | 60.50% | -0.80 | +3.3 | 48 |
| 2020-11-07 | Nomme Kalju | D 1-1 | 56.5 | 868 | 1326 | 4.83% | 14.81% | 80.35% | -2.50 | +5.8 | 20 |
| 2020-11-07 | @ Kuressaare | D 1-1 | 56.5 | 1326 | 868 | 80.35% | 14.81% | 4.83% | +2.50 | -5.8 | 49 |
| 2020-11-08 | Flora | L 0-1 | 30.6 | 1033 | 1481 | 5.09% | 14.99% | 79.92% | -2.44 | -1.8 | 31 |
| 2020-11-08 | @ Tammeka | W 1-0 | 30.6 | 1481 | 1033 | 79.92% | 14.99% | 5.09% | +2.44 | +1.8 | 71 |
| 2020-11-08 | Narva Trans | W 4-2 | 38.0 | 1347 | 977 | 76.19% | 16.28% | 7.53% | +1.90 | +4.0 | 60 |
| 2020-11-08 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 2-4 | 38.0 | 977 | 1347 | 7.53% | 16.28% | 76.19% | -1.90 | -4.1 | 21 |
| 2020-11-08 | Tulevik Viljandi | W 1-0 | 46.2 | 874 | 981 | 26.26% | 19.30% | 54.43% | -0.63 | +16.9 | 18 |
| 2020-11-08 | @ Tallinna Kalev | L 0-1 | 46.2 | 981 | 874 | 54.43% | 19.30% | 26.26% | +0.63 | -16.9 | 30 |
| 2020-11-14 | Levadia | L 1-2 | 38.1 | 1038 | 1327 | 11.25% | 17.49% | 71.26% | -1.60 | -3.9 | 25 |
| 2020-11-14 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 2-1 | 38.1 | 1327 | 1038 | 71.26% | 17.49% | 11.25% | +1.60 | +3.9 | 53 |
| 2020-12-02 | Flora | L 0-2 | 38.5 | 1354 | 1536 | 18.75% | 18.73% | 62.52% | -1.03 | -12.8 | 53 |
| 2020-12-02 | @ Levadia | W 2-0 | 38.5 | 1536 | 1354 | 62.52% | 18.73% | 18.75% | +1.03 | +12.8 | 74 |
Second Phase Game Log
Every second-phase (championship / middle / relegation round) game from each team's perspective, filtered by the team selected at the top of the tab; the table scrolls within its frame. Sort any column by clicking its header. @ before an opponent name indicates an away game. The final column is running points within the second phase only.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Excitement | Pre Elo | Opp Elo | Win % | Tie % | Loss % | Proj. Margin | Elo Δ | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-21 | Narva Trans | L 0-3 | 32.9 | 873 | 973 | 27.14% | 19.34% | 53.51% | -0.59 | -25.7 | 0 |
| 2020-11-21 | @ Kuressaare | W 3-0 | 32.9 | 973 | 873 | 53.51% | 19.34% | 27.14% | +0.59 | +25.7 | 3 |
| 2020-11-21 | Tallinna Legion | L 0-2 | 33.6 | 891 | 1034 | 22.40% | 19.06% | 58.54% | -0.82 | -15.0 | 0 |
| 2020-11-21 | @ Tallinna Kalev | W 2-0 | 33.6 | 1034 | 891 | 58.54% | 19.06% | 22.40% | +0.82 | +15.0 | 3 |
| 2020-11-22 | Flora | L 0-3 | 34.5 | 1320 | 1483 | 20.49% | 18.90% | 60.61% | -0.93 | -20.1 | 0 |
| 2020-11-22 | @ Nomme Kalju | W 3-0 | 34.5 | 1483 | 1320 | 60.61% | 18.90% | 20.49% | +0.93 | +20.1 | 3 |
| 2020-11-22 | Paide Linnameeskond | D 2-2 | 62.2 | 1331 | 1351 | 37.38% | 19.60% | 43.02% | -0.17 | +0.3 | 1 |
| 2020-11-22 | @ Levadia | D 2-2 | 62.2 | 1351 | 1331 | 43.02% | 19.60% | 37.38% | +0.17 | -0.3 | 1 |
| 2020-11-24 | Kuressaare | L 0-1 | 49.0 | 1049 | 848 | 64.35% | 18.54% | 17.11% | +1.01 | -19.8 | 3 |
| 2020-11-24 | @ Tallinna Legion | W 1-0 | 49.0 | 848 | 1049 | 17.11% | 18.54% | 64.35% | -1.01 | +19.9 | 3 |
| 2020-11-24 | Tallinna Kalev | D 1-1 | 55.2 | 999 | 876 | 56.21% | 19.21% | 24.58% | +0.59 | -2.3 | 4 |
| 2020-11-24 | @ Narva Trans | D 1-1 | 55.2 | 876 | 999 | 24.58% | 19.21% | 56.21% | -0.59 | +2.3 | 1 |
| 2020-11-28 | Kuressaare | D 1-1 | 55.0 | 879 | 868 | 41.77% | 19.61% | 38.62% | +0.00 | -0.2 | 2 |
| 2020-11-28 | @ Tallinna Kalev | D 1-1 | 55.0 | 868 | 879 | 38.62% | 19.61% | 41.77% | +0.00 | +0.2 | 4 |
| 2020-11-28 | Tallinna Legion | L 1-3 | 43.2 | 996 | 1030 | 35.53% | 19.58% | 44.89% | -0.24 | -19.2 | 4 |
| 2020-11-28 | @ Narva Trans | W 3-1 | 43.2 | 1030 | 996 | 44.89% | 19.58% | 35.53% | +0.24 | +19.2 | 6 |
| 2020-11-29 | Flora | L 1-7 | 37.4 | 1351 | 1503 | 21.52% | 18.99% | 59.49% | -0.87 | -33.1 | 1 |
| 2020-11-29 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | W 7-1 | 37.4 | 1503 | 1351 | 59.49% | 18.99% | 21.52% | +0.87 | +33.1 | 6 |
| 2020-11-29 | Levadia | L 0-2 | 39.0 | 1300 | 1331 | 35.74% | 19.59% | 44.68% | -0.23 | -22.3 | 0 |
| 2020-11-29 | @ Nomme Kalju | W 2-0 | 39.0 | 1331 | 1300 | 44.68% | 19.59% | 35.74% | +0.23 | +22.3 | 4 |
| 2020-12-06 | Nomme Kalju | W 7-4 | 45.7 | 1318 | 1277 | 45.84% | 19.57% | 34.59% | +0.15 | +20.3 | 4 |
| 2020-12-06 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | L 4-7 | 45.7 | 1277 | 1318 | 34.59% | 19.57% | 45.84% | -0.15 | -20.3 | 0 |
Biggest Upsets
The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.
| # | Date | Underdog Win % | Winning Team | Losing Team | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Elo | Score | Team | Elo | Score | |||
| 1 | 2020-07-08 | 4.93% | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 989 | 2 | Flora | 1443 | 1 |
| 2 | 2020-05-19 | 9.33% | Tulevik Viljandi | 927 | 2 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 1254 | 1 |
| 3 | 2020-07-08 | 14.10% | @ Narva Trans | 1029 | 1 | Paide Linnameeskond | 1271 | 0 |
| 4 | 2020-05-30 | 14.37% | @ Kuressaare | 864 | 3 | Narva Trans | 1102 | 2 |
| 5 | 2020-05-23 | 15.06% | Tallinna Legion | 1082 | 2 | @ Nomme Kalju | 1311 | 1 |
| 6 | 2020-06-02 | 16.53% | Kuressaare | 882 | 2 | @ Tammeka | 1091 | 1 |
| 7 | 2020-11-24 | 17.11% | Kuressaare | 848 | 1 | @ Tallinna Legion | 1049 | 0 |
| 8 | 2020-05-24 | 17.28% | Tallinna Kalev | 915 | 2 | @ Tammeka | 1115 | 0 |
| 9 | 2020-10-31 | 17.81% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 829 | 4 | Narva Trans | 1022 | 1 |
| 10 | 2020-06-03 | 21.09% | Tulevik Viljandi | 927 | 2 | @ Narva Trans | 1084 | 0 |
| 11 | 2020-07-01 | 21.24% | @ Kuressaare | 885 | 3 | Tulevik Viljandi | 1040 | 0 |
| 12 | 2020-06-02 | 22.58% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 946 | 1 | Tallinna Legion | 1088 | 0 |
| 13 | 2020-06-17 | 26.01% | Paide Linnameeskond | 1225 | 1 | @ Nomme Kalju | 1334 | 0 |
| 14 | 2020-11-08 | 26.26% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 874 | 1 | Tulevik Viljandi | 981 | 0 |
| 15 | 2020-06-17 | 28.77% | Kuressaare | 858 | 2 | @ Tallinna Kalev | 944 | 0 |
| 16 | 2020-07-25 | 29.99% | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 1223 | 4 | Levadia | 1299 | 2 |
| 17 | 2020-10-03 | 30.24% | Tallinna Kalev | 829 | 1 | @ Kuressaare | 903 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020-09-13 | 31.00% | @ Tallinna Legion | 994 | 2 | Narva Trans | 1062 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020-09-19 | 31.20% | Tulevik Viljandi | 981 | 1 | @ Narva Trans | 1047 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020-06-16 | 31.63% | Tulevik Viljandi | 1002 | 2 | @ Tallinna Legion | 1065 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020-09-20 | 32.48% | @ Levadia | 1312 | 2 | Nomme Kalju | 1368 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020-08-08 | 34.81% | Tallinna Legion | 989 | 2 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 1027 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020-06-03 | 35.24% | @ Nomme Kalju | 1308 | 2 | Levadia | 1343 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020-09-27 | 36.25% | @ Tallinna Legion | 1007 | 3 | Tammeka | 1035 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020-05-30 | 36.77% | Tammeka | 1078 | 1 | @ Tallinna Legion | 1102 | 0 |
Biggest Elo Changes
The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.
| # | Date | Elo Δ | Winning Team | Losing Team | Tie % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Score | Elo | Win % | Team | Score | Elo | Win % | ||||
| 1 | 2020-07-01 | 50.64 | @ Kuressaare | 3 | 885 | 21.24% | Tulevik Viljandi | 0 | 1040 | 59.80% | 18.97% |
| 2 | 2020-06-07 | 47.52 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 5 | 962 | 48.61% | Kuressaare | 0 | 901 | 31.88% | 19.51% |
| 3 | 2020-10-31 | 45.30 | @ Tallinna Kalev | 4 | 829 | 17.81% | Narva Trans | 1 | 1022 | 63.57% | 18.62% |
| 4 | 2020-05-24 | 37.32 | Tallinna Kalev | 2 | 915 | 17.28% | @ Tammeka | 0 | 1115 | 64.16% | 18.56% |
| 5 | 2020-06-17 | 36.71 | @ Flora | 4 | 1399 | 50.46% | Levadia | 0 | 1324 | 30.08% | 19.46% |
| 6 | 2020-06-03 | 34.95 | Tulevik Viljandi | 2 | 927 | 21.09% | @ Narva Trans | 0 | 1084 | 59.96% | 18.95% |
| 7 | 2020-11-29 | 33.11 | Flora | 7 | 1503 | 59.49% | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 1 | 1351 | 21.52% | 18.99% |
| 8 | 2020-06-17 | 30.52 | Kuressaare | 2 | 858 | 28.77% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 944 | 51.82% | 19.41% |
| 9 | 2020-06-16 | 28.96 | Tulevik Viljandi | 2 | 1002 | 31.63% | @ Tallinna Legion | 0 | 1065 | 48.86% | 19.51% |
| 10 | 2020-08-08 | 27.29 | Tallinna Legion | 2 | 989 | 34.81% | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 0 | 1027 | 45.62% | 19.57% |
| 11 | 2020-06-03 | 27.06 | @ Nomme Kalju | 2 | 1308 | 35.24% | Levadia | 0 | 1343 | 45.18% | 19.58% |
| 12 | 2020-07-24 | 25.93 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 2 | 1018 | 37.46% | Tammeka | 0 | 1037 | 42.93% | 19.60% |
| 13 | 2020-11-21 | 25.74 | Narva Trans | 3 | 973 | 53.51% | @ Kuressaare | 0 | 873 | 27.14% | 19.34% |
| 14 | 2020-07-25 | 23.11 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 4 | 1223 | 29.99% | Levadia | 2 | 1299 | 50.55% | 19.46% |
| 15 | 2020-05-31 | 23.08 | @ Levadia | 4 | 1320 | 51.41% | Paide Linnameeskond | 1 | 1238 | 29.16% | 19.43% |
| 16 | 2020-09-27 | 22.99 | @ Tallinna Legion | 3 | 1007 | 36.25% | Tammeka | 1 | 1035 | 44.16% | 19.59% |
| 17 | 2020-07-08 | 22.90 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 2 | 989 | 4.93% | Flora | 1 | 1443 | 80.18% | 14.88% |
| 18 | 2020-07-08 | 22.67 | Tallinna Legion | 3 | 1022 | 36.98% | @ Tammeka | 1 | 1045 | 43.42% | 19.60% |
| 19 | 2020-11-29 | 22.33 | Levadia | 2 | 1331 | 44.68% | @ Nomme Kalju | 0 | 1300 | 35.74% | 19.59% |
| 20 | 2020-10-25 | 22.22 | Paide Linnameeskond | 3 | 1329 | 38.00% | @ Nomme Kalju | 1 | 1345 | 42.39% | 19.61% |
| 21 | 2020-07-25 | 22.05 | @ Narva Trans | 2 | 1061 | 45.25% | Tallinna Legion | 0 | 1025 | 35.17% | 19.58% |
| 22 | 2020-05-19 | 21.33 | Tulevik Viljandi | 2 | 927 | 9.33% | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 1 | 1254 | 73.73% | 16.94% |
| 23 | 2020-07-08 | 20.89 | @ Narva Trans | 1 | 1029 | 14.10% | Paide Linnameeskond | 0 | 1271 | 67.82% | 18.08% |
| 24 | 2020-12-06 | 20.34 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 7 | 1318 | 45.84% | Nomme Kalju | 4 | 1277 | 34.59% | 19.57% |
| 25 | 2020-11-22 | 20.08 | Flora | 3 | 1483 | 60.61% | @ Nomme Kalju | 0 | 1320 | 20.49% | 18.90% |
Most & Least Exciting Games
The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.
| # | Date | Excitement | Winning Team | Losing Team | Tie % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Score | Elo | Win % | Team | Score | Elo | Win % | ||||
| 1 | 2020-06-27 | 67.1 | @ Narva Trans | 4 | 1030 | 13.15% | Levadia | 4 | 1287 | 68.95% | 17.90% |
| 2 | 2020-11-22 | 62.2 | @ Levadia | 2 | 1331 | 37.38% | Paide Linnameeskond | 2 | 1351 | 43.02% | 19.60% |
| 3 | 2020-08-14 | 61.6 | @ Kuressaare | 2 | 910 | 7.25% | Levadia | 2 | 1287 | 76.59% | 16.16% |
| 4 | 2020-06-13 | 61.3 | @ Levadia | 2 | 1327 | 69.94% | Tammeka | 2 | 1057 | 12.33% | 17.74% |
| 5 | 2020-09-19 | 60.6 | @ Kuressaare | 2 | 899 | 26.03% | Tallinna Legion | 2 | 1009 | 54.69% | 19.29% |
| 6 | 2020-07-18 | 60.5 | @ Tammeka | 2 | 1036 | 36.70% | Narva Trans | 2 | 1061 | 43.70% | 19.60% |
| 7 | 2020-07-27 | 60.5 | @ Kuressaare | 2 | 921 | 46.33% | Tallinna Kalev | 2 | 877 | 34.11% | 19.56% |
| 8 | 2020-05-30 | 60.0 | @ Kuressaare | 3 | 864 | 14.37% | Narva Trans | 2 | 1102 | 67.51% | 18.13% |
| 9 | 2020-07-08 | 58.1 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 2 | 989 | 4.93% | Flora | 1 | 1443 | 80.18% | 14.88% |
| 10 | 2020-05-19 | 56.5 | Tulevik Viljandi | 2 | 927 | 9.33% | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 1 | 1254 | 73.73% | 16.94% |
| 11 | 2020-11-07 | 56.5 | @ Kuressaare | 1 | 868 | 4.83% | Nomme Kalju | 1 | 1326 | 80.35% | 14.81% |
| 12 | 2020-07-01 | 56.1 | @ Levadia | 1 | 1285 | 34.34% | Nomme Kalju | 1 | 1327 | 46.09% | 19.57% |
| 13 | 2020-07-31 | 56.0 | @ Nomme Kalju | 1 | 1339 | 73.80% | Tammeka | 1 | 1011 | 9.28% | 16.93% |
| 14 | 2020-10-04 | 56.0 | @ Nomme Kalju | 1 | 1346 | 73.05% | Tallinna Legion | 1 | 1030 | 9.85% | 17.10% |
| 15 | 2020-08-09 | 55.7 | @ Tammeka | 1 | 1016 | 11.99% | Levadia | 1 | 1292 | 70.35% | 17.66% |
| 16 | 2020-05-20 | 55.4 | @ Tallinna Kalev | 1 | 912 | 17.37% | Narva Trans | 1 | 1110 | 64.06% | 18.57% |
| 17 | 2020-11-24 | 55.2 | @ Narva Trans | 1 | 999 | 56.21% | Tallinna Kalev | 1 | 876 | 24.58% | 19.21% |
| 18 | 2020-07-17 | 55.1 | @ Tallinna Legion | 1 | 1027 | 54.59% | Kuressaare | 1 | 919 | 26.12% | 19.29% |
| 19 | 2020-09-26 | 55.1 | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 1 | 996 | 53.02% | Kuressaare | 1 | 901 | 27.61% | 19.37% |
| 20 | 2020-05-23 | 55.0 | Tallinna Legion | 2 | 1082 | 15.06% | @ Nomme Kalju | 1 | 1311 | 66.69% | 18.24% |
| 21 | 2020-11-28 | 55.0 | @ Tallinna Kalev | 1 | 879 | 41.77% | Kuressaare | 1 | 868 | 38.62% | 19.61% |
| 22 | 2020-11-01 | 54.8 | @ Flora | 0 | 1484 | 60.50% | Nomme Kalju | 0 | 1322 | 20.59% | 18.91% |
| 23 | 2020-06-02 | 54.3 | Kuressaare | 2 | 882 | 16.53% | @ Tammeka | 1 | 1091 | 65.01% | 18.46% |
| 24 | 2020-07-25 | 52.3 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 4 | 1223 | 29.99% | Levadia | 2 | 1299 | 50.55% | 19.46% |
| 25 | 2020-09-30 | 51.9 | @ Nomme Kalju | 0 | 1352 | 75.50% | Tulevik Viljandi | 0 | 995 | 8.02% | 16.48% |
| # | Date | Excitement | Winning Team | Losing Team | Tie % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Score | Elo | Win % | Team | Score | Elo | Win % | ||||
| 1 | 2020-10-25 | 22.5 | Flora | 4 | 1473 | 85.32% | @ Kuressaare | 0 | 875 | 2.36% | 12.32% |
| 2 | 2020-06-27 | 22.9 | Flora | 4 | 1435 | 83.69% | @ Kuressaare | 0 | 888 | 3.07% | 13.24% |
| 3 | 2020-07-31 | 23.7 | Flora | 3 | 1455 | 84.68% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 877 | 2.62% | 12.69% |
| 4 | 2020-08-07 | 24.0 | @ Flora | 3 | 1457 | 83.62% | Kuressaare | 0 | 913 | 3.10% | 13.28% |
| 5 | 2020-08-09 | 24.9 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 4 | 1260 | 76.98% | Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 875 | 6.98% | 16.04% |
| 6 | 2020-08-30 | 24.9 | @ Levadia | 3 | 1300 | 80.21% | Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 846 | 4.92% | 14.87% |
| 7 | 2020-07-08 | 25.0 | Levadia | 4 | 1286 | 76.62% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 907 | 7.23% | 16.15% |
| 8 | 2020-06-14 | 25.2 | Nomme Kalju | 4 | 1324 | 76.22% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 954 | 7.51% | 16.27% |
| 9 | 2020-08-22 | 25.2 | Paide Linnameeskond | 4 | 1277 | 75.81% | @ Kuressaare | 0 | 914 | 7.79% | 16.39% |
| 10 | 2020-06-06 | 25.5 | @ Levadia | 4 | 1316 | 75.18% | Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 964 | 8.25% | 16.57% |
| 11 | 2020-05-30 | 25.6 | @ Flora | 3 | 1362 | 78.20% | Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 953 | 6.17% | 15.63% |
| 12 | 2020-05-31 | 25.9 | Nomme Kalju | 6 | 1292 | 74.99% | @ Tulevik Viljandi | 0 | 943 | 8.39% | 16.62% |
| 13 | 2020-06-12 | 26.1 | @ Flora | 3 | 1392 | 76.82% | Tulevik Viljandi | 0 | 1010 | 7.09% | 16.09% |
| 14 | 2020-08-15 | 26.3 | Nomme Kalju | 6 | 1348 | 74.03% | @ Tallinna Legion | 0 | 1016 | 9.10% | 16.87% |
| 15 | 2020-05-19 | 27.4 | Nomme Kalju | 2 | 1307 | 79.33% | @ Kuressaare | 0 | 873 | 5.45% | 15.22% |
| 16 | 2020-07-12 | 27.5 | @ Nomme Kalju | 2 | 1328 | 79.16% | Tallinna Kalev | 0 | 898 | 5.56% | 15.29% |
| 17 | 2020-07-12 | 27.5 | @ Levadia | 4 | 1295 | 68.43% | Tallinna Legion | 0 | 1045 | 13.58% | 17.99% |
| 18 | 2020-09-12 | 28.2 | Flora | 4 | 1468 | 86.16% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 1 | 841 | 2.03% | 11.81% |
| 19 | 2020-03-07 | 28.4 | Paide Linnameeskond | 8 | 1234 | 72.22% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 1 | 931 | 10.49% | 17.29% |
| 20 | 2020-05-23 | 28.5 | @ Paide Linnameeskond | 2 | 1232 | 75.81% | Kuressaare | 0 | 869 | 7.80% | 16.39% |
| 21 | 2020-08-01 | 28.6 | Paide Linnameeskond | 3 | 1246 | 67.87% | @ Tallinna Legion | 0 | 1003 | 14.05% | 18.07% |
| 22 | 2020-09-13 | 28.7 | Levadia | 5 | 1305 | 77.65% | @ Kuressaare | 1 | 907 | 6.53% | 15.82% |
| 23 | 2020-08-09 | 28.8 | @ Nomme Kalju | 3 | 1334 | 67.93% | Narva Trans | 0 | 1090 | 14.00% | 18.07% |
| 24 | 2020-10-17 | 29.4 | @ Levadia | 2 | 1313 | 72.91% | Tulevik Viljandi | 0 | 999 | 9.95% | 17.14% |
| 25 | 2020-10-17 | 29.5 | Nomme Kalju | 4 | 1341 | 81.89% | @ Tallinna Kalev | 1 | 845 | 3.98% | 14.14% |