Home / Leagues / Finland / Mestaruussarja / 1936
‹ ›

1936 Mestaruussarja Season

56 games

Final

Champion

HJK

19 points · 8th Title

Last Title: 1925

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

HJK

4.63 points above expected

19 points · 14.37 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

IF Drott

5.35 points below expected

5 points · 10.35 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 HJK Champion 14 9 1 4 19 37 21 +16 14.37 +4.63
2 HPS Helsinki 14 8 1 5 17 28 26 +2 17.21 -0.21
3 Helsingfors 14 7 2 5 16 38 22 +16 17.41 -1.41
4 Sudet 14 6 3 5 15 26 21 +5 13.12 +1.88
5 Toverit Helsinki 14 5 4 5 14 25 27 -2 14.80 -0.80
6 TPS Turku 14 7 0 7 14 30 36 -6 10.18 +3.82
7 VPS 14 5 2 7 12 36 31 +5 14.56 -2.56
8 IF Drott 14 2 1 11 5 14 50 -36 10.35 -5.35

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 HJK 19 14.37 +4.63
2 TPS Turku 14 10.18 +3.82
3 Sudet 15 13.12 +1.88
4 HPS Helsinki 17 17.21 -0.21
5 Toverit Helsinki 14 14.80 -0.80

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 IF Drott 5 10.35 -5.35
2 VPS 12 14.56 -2.56
3 Helsingfors 16 17.41 -1.41
4 Toverit Helsinki 14 14.80 -0.80
5 HPS Helsinki 17 17.21 -0.21

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Toverit Helsinki 4 May 21 – Jun 21 1 in 69
2 HJK 5 Jun 7 – Aug 17 1 in 29
3 TPS Turku 3 Aug 23 – Sep 6 1 in 28
4 Sudet 2 Sep 6 – Sep 13 1 in 10
5 VPS 2 Jun 14 – Jul 5 1 in 5

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IF Drott 8 Jun 1 – Sep 13 1 in 108
2 VPS 4 Aug 16 – Sep 6 1 in 28
3 Toverit Helsinki 3 Sep 13 – Oct 3 1 in 21
4 Sudet 2 Sep 20 – Oct 4 1 in 15
5 Helsingfors 2 Jun 1 – Jun 10 1 in 12

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Toverit Helsinki 6 May 21 – Jul 15 1 in 79
2 Sudet 5 Jul 5 – Sep 13 1 in 31
3 HJK 6 Jun 7 – Aug 23 1 in 21
4 TPS Turku 3 Aug 23 – Sep 6 1 in 9
5 Helsingfors 3 Jul 5 – Aug 16 1 in 3

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Toverit Helsinki 8 Jul 8 – Oct 11 1 in 449
2 IF Drott 8 Jun 1 – Sep 13 1 in 19
3 VPS 4 Aug 16 – Sep 6 1 in 8
4 Helsingfors 3 Sep 1 – Sep 20 1 in 8
5 HPS Helsinki 3 Jul 5 – Aug 17 1 in 8

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
HJK 903 19 +10 8 5.4 +2.6
HPS Helsinki 958 17 +8 6 5.8 +0.2
Helsingfors 959 16 +5 5 5.7 -0.7
Sudet 858 15 -1 5 4.8 +0.2
TPS Turku 794 14 +41 8 3.8 +4.2
Toverit Helsinki 867 14 -24 3 6.2 -3.2
VPS 869 12 -9 3 4.4 -1.4
IF Drott 723 5 -14 3 2.9 +0.1

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team HJK HH HEL ID SUD TT TH VPS
HJK —
1-0-1
2.47
1-0-1
2.36
2-0-0
3.56
1-1-0
3.02
2-0-0
3.56
1-0-1
2.84
1-0-1
2.92
HPS Helsinki
1-0-1
3.27
 —
1-0-1
2.89
2-0-0
4.21
1-0-1
3.60
1-0-1
4.07
1-1-0
3.25
1-0-1
3.34
Helsingfors
1-0-1
3.38
1-0-1
2.85
 —
2-0-0
4.17
0-0-2
3.55
2-0-0
3.91
0-1-1
3.27
1-1-0
3.28
IF Drott
0-0-2
2.18
0-0-2
1.54
0-0-2
1.57
 —
2-0-0
2.22
0-0-2
2.81
0-1-1
1.99
0-0-2
2.08
Sudet
0-1-1
2.72
1-0-1
2.14
2-0-0
2.19
0-0-2
3.53
 —
1-0-1
3.36
1-1-0
2.64
1-1-0
2.73
TPS Turku
0-0-2
2.18
1-0-1
1.68
0-0-2
1.84
2-0-0
2.93
1-0-1
2.38
 —
1-0-1
1.98
2-0-0
2.05
Toverit Helsinki
1-0-1
2.90
0-1-1
2.49
1-1-0
2.47
1-1-0
3.76
0-1-1
3.10
1-0-1
3.76
 —
1-0-1
2.90
VPS
1-0-1
2.82
1-0-1
2.40
0-1-1
2.46
2-0-0
3.65
0-1-1
3.01
0-0-2
3.69
1-0-1
2.83
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.54 +3.9
Allowed 0.82 -3.9
Differential 0.81 +2.3

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.57%4.46%0.89%1.79%0.89%1.79%13.39%
14.46%3.57%10.71%2.68%4.46%4.46%30.36%
20.89%10.71%3.57%7.14%0.89%1.79%25.00%
31.79%2.68%7.14%1.79%1.79%—15.18%
40.89%4.46%0.89%1.79%——8.04%
5+1.79%4.46%1.79%———8.04%
Total13.39%30.36%25.00%15.18%8.04%8.04%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.09 2.09 +0.00
SD 1.73 1.73 2.72
CV 0.83 0.83 —
Max 9 9 +8
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 56

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%——7.14%——14.29%
17.14%—14.29%———21.43%
2———7.14%——7.14%
37.14%7.14%21.43%———35.71%
4———7.14%——7.14%
5+7.14%7.14%————14.29%
Total28.57%14.29%35.71%21.43%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.64 1.50 +1.14
SD 2.13 1.16 2.66
CV 0.81 0.77 —
Max 8 3 +8
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
114.29%7.14%—7.14%14.29%—42.86%
27.14%14.29%———7.14%28.57%
37.14%———7.14%—14.29%
47.14%—7.14%———14.29%
5+———————
Total35.71%21.43%7.14%7.14%21.43%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.00 1.86 +0.14
SD 1.11 1.99 2.41
CV 0.55 1.07 —
Max 4 6 +4
Min 1 0 -4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—14.29%7.14%———21.43%
1—7.14%————7.14%
2—14.29%7.14%14.29%——35.71%
3———————
4———7.14%——7.14%
5+7.14%14.29%7.14%———28.57%
Total7.14%50.00%21.43%21.43%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.71 1.57 +1.14
SD 2.30 0.94 2.66
CV 0.85 0.60 —
Max 7 3 +7
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%————7.14%14.29%
17.14%—28.57%—7.14%28.57%71.43%
2—7.14%—7.14%——14.29%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total14.29%7.14%28.57%7.14%7.14%35.71%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.00 3.57 -2.57
SD 0.55 2.85 3.01
CV 0.55 0.80 —
Max 2 9 +1
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%14.29%————21.43%
17.14%—7.14%———14.29%
2—7.14%7.14%14.29%——28.57%
3—14.29%7.14%7.14%——28.57%
4—7.14%————7.14%
5+———————
Total14.29%42.86%21.43%21.43%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.86 1.50 +0.36
SD 1.29 1.02 1.34
CV 0.70 0.68 —
Max 4 3 +3
Min 0 0 -1

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.14%———7.14%14.29%
1———7.14%7.14%7.14%21.43%
2—21.43%—7.14%—7.14%35.71%
3——7.14%———7.14%
4—14.29%————14.29%
5+—7.14%————7.14%
Total—50.00%7.14%14.29%7.14%21.43%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.14 2.57 -0.43
SD 1.66 1.99 3.20
CV 0.77 0.77 —
Max 6 7 +5
Min 0 1 -7

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%———7.14%—14.29%
1—14.29%14.29%7.14%——35.71%
2—7.14%7.14%———14.29%
3——21.43%—7.14%—28.57%
4—7.14%————7.14%
5+———————
Total7.14%28.57%42.86%7.14%14.29%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.79 1.93 -0.14
SD 1.25 1.14 1.66
CV 0.70 0.59 —
Max 4 4 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———7.14%——7.14%
1——21.43%—7.14%—28.57%
2—14.29%7.14%7.14%7.14%—35.71%
3———7.14%——7.14%
4—7.14%————7.14%
5+—7.14%7.14%———14.29%
Total—28.57%35.71%21.43%14.29%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.57 2.21 +0.36
SD 2.38 1.05 2.98
CV 0.92 0.47 —
Max 9 4 +8
Min 0 1 -3

Games Played: 14

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Helsingfors 959 16 17.41 -1.41 41.0% 10 12 15 18 20 22 25
HPS Helsinki 958 17 17.21 -0.21 57.0% 11 13 15 17 19 22 24
HJK 903 19 14.37 +4.63 93.0% 5 9 12 14 16 20 23
VPS 869 12 14.56 -2.56 30.0% 6 9 12 15 17 20 23
Toverit Helsinki 867 14 14.80 -0.80 47.0% 8 9 13 15 17 19 21
Sudet 858 15 13.12 +1.88 78.0% 7 8 11 13 15 18 21
TPS Turku 794 14 10.18 +3.82 95.0% 4 5 8 10 12 14 17
IF Drott 723 5 10.35 -5.35 6.0% 4 5 8 10 13 15 16

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 9.5% * Slight Edge: 9.5% to 15.5% * Clear Edge: 15.5% to 20% * Strong Edge: 20% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+26.79%
Strong Edge
57.14%12.50%30.36%
Elo Value
Home Edge
130 Elo
0.008 goals per Elo point
095.39400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.57 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.74+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 5 * Wide Open: 5 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 4th * Longshot: 5th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.06 * Tight Race: 0.06 to 0.11 * Comfortable: 0.11 to 0.21 * Runaway: 0.21 and up.
Title-Race Openness
4.0
Open
13458
Champion Preseason Odds
17%
HJK, 3rd of 8
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.14/gm
Comfortable
00.160.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.47 * Some Luck: 2.47 to 3.7 * Lucky: 3.7 to 4.93 * Wild Swing: 4.93 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.18 * Close: 1.18 to 1.78 * Off: 1.78 to 2.37 * Way Off: 2.37 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 8 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 8 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 8 * As Expected: 8 to 12.8 * Several Outliers: 12.8 to 17.6 * Many Outliers: 17.6 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
3.11 points
Some Luck
03.088
Average Finish Error
Expected
2.00
Off
01.483
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 93.75%
95.00%
TPS Turku
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
6.00%
IF Drott
06.25%50
Season Outliers
Expected
0 of 8
Minimal Outliers
00.88

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.15 * Even: 0.15 to 0.17 * Top-Heavy: 0.17 to 0.2 * Lopsided: 0.2 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.4 * Moderate Separation: 1.4 to 1.7 * Strong Separation: 1.7 to 1.9 * Wide Separation: 1.9 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 62.5% * Slight Edge: 62.5% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 73.5% * Wide Edge: 73.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82.5% * Clear Edge: 82.5% to 90% * Strong Edge: 90% to 93% * Dominant: 93% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 51.5% * Some Drama: 51.5% to 57.5% * Frequent: 57.5% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16.5% * Occasional: 16.5% to 21.5% * Frequent: 21.5% to 26.5% * Very Frequent: 26.5% and up.
Gini Index
0.15
Balanced
00.150.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 79.48
1.20
Coin-Flip Parity
0.951.41.71.92.5
Interquartile Edge
61%
Even
50%62.5%70%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
80%
Even
50%80%100%
Close Games
Expected
61%
Frequent
0%42%100%
Blowouts
Expected
30%
Very Frequent
0%36%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.33 * Slight Separation: 0.33 to 0.37 * Notable Separation: 0.37 to 0.41 * Lopsided: 0.41 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.21 * Some Carryover: 0.21 to 0.46 * Strong Carryover: 0.46 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23% * As Expected: 23% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 28% * Very Upset-Prone: 28% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19.5% * As Expected: 19.5% to 21.5% * Shaky Favorites: 21.5% to 25.5% * Very Shaky: 25.5% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.54
Highly Predictable
00.522
Matchup Imbalance
0.41
Lopsided
00.330.410.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.00
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.53
Strong Carryover
00.210.460.591
Upset Rate
Expected
25%
As Expected
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
20%
As Expected
0%22%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.19 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.19 to 0.28 * Above Noise: 0.28 to 0.38 * Well Above Noise: 0.38 and up.
Probability calibration
0.46
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.85
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.101
Well Within Noise
00.1900.5

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team12345678
HJK17.00%11.00%14.00%17.00%15.00%14.00%6.00%6.00%
HPS Helsinki30.00%20.00%16.00%20.00%8.00%5.00%1.00%—
Helsingfors34.00%26.00%16.00%13.00%2.00%6.00%3.00%—
Sudet4.00%7.00%14.00%10.00%21.00%15.00%20.00%9.00%
Toverit Helsinki9.00%15.00%18.00%18.00%13.00%16.00%7.00%4.00%
TPS Turku—2.00%2.00%3.00%14.00%13.00%32.00%34.00%
VPS6.00%19.00%16.00%15.00%15.00%12.00%12.00%5.00%
IF Drott——4.00%4.00%12.00%19.00%19.00%42.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
HPS Helsinki 99.00% 1.00%
Helsingfors 97.00% 3.00%
Toverit Helsinki 89.00% 11.00%
HJK 88.00% 12.00%
VPS 83.00% 17.00%
Sudet 71.00% 29.00%
IF Drott 39.00% 61.00%
TPS Turku 34.00% 66.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1936-05-03 IF Drott W 2-133.0 959 779 77.06% 12.36% 10.58%+2.12 +1.0 2
1936-05-03 @ HPS Helsinki L 1-233.0 779 959 10.58% 12.36% 77.06%-2.12 -1.0 0
1936-05-10 Toverit Helsinki W 3-137.1 846 882 57.68% 13.22% 29.10%+0.45 +4.6 2
1936-05-10 @ Sudet L 1-337.1 882 846 29.10% 13.22% 57.68%-0.45 -4.6 0
1936-05-10 Helsingfors L 0-734.6 790 935 43.06% 13.23% 43.71%-0.39 -23.9 0
1936-05-10 @ TPS Turku W 7-034.6 935 790 43.71% 13.23% 43.06%+0.39 +23.9 2
1936-05-10 HJK W 2-137.3 873 867 62.49% 13.13% 24.38%+0.77 +2.2 2
1936-05-10 @ VPS L 1-237.3 867 873 24.38% 13.13% 62.49%-0.77 -2.2 0
1936-05-17 TPS Turku L 1-249.0 778 766 63.30% 13.11% 23.58%+0.83 -5.3 0
1936-05-17 @ IF Drott W 2-149.0 766 778 23.58% 13.11% 63.30%-0.83 +5.3 2
1936-05-21 Toverit Helsinki L 2-352.8 865 878 60.49% 13.17% 26.33%+0.64 -4.8 0
1936-05-21 @ HJK W 3-252.8 878 865 26.33% 13.17% 60.49%-0.64 +4.8 2
1936-05-21 Sudet D 3-362.4 875 851 64.52% 13.08% 22.40%+0.92 -0.6 3
1936-05-21 @ VPS D 3-362.4 851 875 22.40% 13.08% 64.52%-0.92 +0.6 3
1936-05-24 Sudet W 2-140.4 773 851 52.38% 13.25% 34.37%+0.13 +3.1 2
1936-05-24 @ IF Drott L 1-240.4 851 773 34.37% 13.25% 52.38%-0.13 -3.1 3
1936-05-24 HPS Helsinki L 0-137.5 771 960 36.90% 13.15% 49.95%-0.73 -3.4 2
1936-05-24 @ TPS Turku W 1-037.5 960 771 49.95% 13.15% 36.90%+0.73 +3.5 4
1936-05-27 HJK W 2-134.7 959 860 71.35% 12.80% 15.85%+1.49 +1.5 4
1936-05-27 @ Helsingfors L 1-234.7 860 959 15.85% 12.80% 71.35%-1.49 -1.5 0
1936-06-01 Helsingfors W 1-038.1 848 960 47.75% 13.25% 39.00%-0.13 +3.6 5
1936-06-01 @ Sudet L 0-138.1 960 848 39.00% 13.25% 47.75%+0.13 -3.6 4
1936-06-01 TPS Turku W 4-131.0 883 767 72.67% 12.72% 14.61%+1.62 +3.4 4
1936-06-01 @ Toverit Helsinki L 1-431.0 767 883 14.61% 12.72% 72.67%-1.62 -3.4 2
1936-06-01 IF Drott W 9-128.5 874 776 71.33% 12.80% 15.86%+1.49 +9.0 5
1936-06-01 @ VPS L 1-928.5 776 874 15.86% 12.80% 71.33%-1.49 -9.0 2
1936-06-07 Sudet W 1-030.7 964 852 72.43% 12.74% 14.83%+1.60 +1.5 6
1936-06-07 @ HPS Helsinki L 0-130.7 852 964 14.83% 12.74% 72.43%-1.60 -1.5 5
1936-06-07 HJK L 2-349.9 767 859 50.55% 13.26% 36.19%+0.03 -4.1 2
1936-06-07 @ IF Drott W 3-249.9 859 767 36.19% 13.26% 50.55%-0.03 +4.1 2
1936-06-07 VPS W 2-142.1 764 883 46.79% 13.25% 39.96%-0.18 +3.5 4
1936-06-07 @ TPS Turku L 1-242.1 883 764 39.96% 13.25% 46.79%+0.18 -3.5 5
1936-06-10 Toverit Helsinki L 2-355.3 957 886 68.98% 12.92% 18.10%+1.28 -5.5 4
1936-06-10 @ Helsingfors W 3-255.3 886 957 18.10% 12.92% 68.98%-1.28 +5.5 6
1936-06-14 IF Drott W 5-128.3 951 763 77.53% 12.31% 10.16%+2.19 +3.1 6
1936-06-14 @ Helsingfors L 1-528.3 763 951 10.16% 12.31% 77.53%-2.19 -3.1 2
1936-06-14 HPS Helsinki W 6-239.3 880 965 51.38% 13.26% 35.36%+0.07 +8.4 7
1936-06-14 @ VPS L 2-639.3 965 880 35.36% 13.26% 51.38%-0.07 -8.4 6
1936-06-14 TPS Turku W 3-133.4 850 768 70.03% 12.87% 17.09%+1.37 +2.8 7
1936-06-14 @ Sudet L 1-333.4 768 850 17.09% 12.87% 70.03%-1.37 -2.8 4
1936-06-21 Sudet W 3-241.8 863 853 63.02% 13.12% 23.86%+0.81 +2.1 4
1936-06-21 @ HJK L 2-341.8 853 863 23.86% 13.12% 63.02%-0.81 -2.1 7
1936-06-21 Toverit Helsinki L 1-243.6 760 892 45.00% 13.24% 41.76%-0.28 -3.9 2
1936-06-21 @ IF Drott W 2-143.6 892 760 41.76% 13.24% 45.00%+0.28 +3.9 8
1936-06-22 Helsingfors W 2-031.5 957 954 62.23% 13.14% 24.63%+0.76 +4.5 8
1936-06-22 @ HPS Helsinki L 0-231.5 954 957 24.63% 13.14% 62.23%-0.76 -4.5 6
1936-07-02 HJK L 1-540.4 765 865 49.41% 13.26% 37.33%-0.04 -13.3 4
1936-07-02 @ TPS Turku W 5-140.4 865 765 37.33% 13.26% 49.41%+0.04 +13.3 6
1936-07-05 TPS Turku W 5-233.3 950 751 78.10% 12.25% 9.65%+2.26 +2.0 8
1936-07-05 @ Helsingfors L 2-533.3 751 950 9.65% 12.25% 78.10%-2.26 -2.0 4
1936-07-05 VPS L 1-440.3 756 888 44.95% 13.24% 41.80%-0.28 -9.5 2
1936-07-05 @ IF Drott W 4-140.3 888 756 41.80% 13.24% 44.95%+0.28 +9.5 9
1936-07-05 HPS Helsinki W 4-138.5 851 961 47.98% 13.26% 38.77%-0.12 +8.3 9
1936-07-05 @ Sudet L 1-438.5 961 851 38.77% 13.26% 47.98%+0.12 -8.3 8
1936-07-08 Toverit Helsinki D 1-153.6 953 896 67.80% 12.97% 19.22%+1.18 -1.1 9
1936-07-08 @ HPS Helsinki D 1-153.6 896 953 19.22% 12.97% 67.80%-1.18 +1.1 9
1936-07-11 IF Drott W 8-026.1 878 747 73.89% 12.64% 13.47%+1.75 +9.3 8
1936-07-11 @ HJK L 0-826.1 747 878 13.47% 12.64% 73.89%-1.75 -9.3 2
1936-07-15 Helsingfors D 1-153.6 897 952 55.37% 13.24% 31.39%+0.31 -0.5 10
1936-07-15 @ Toverit Helsinki D 1-153.6 952 897 31.39% 13.24% 55.37%-0.31 +0.5 9
1936-08-16 VPS W 2-135.8 952 898 67.52% 12.98% 19.49%+1.16 +1.8 11
1936-08-16 @ Helsingfors L 1-235.8 898 952 19.49% 12.98% 67.52%-1.16 -1.8 9
1936-08-17 HPS Helsinki W 3-138.2 888 952 54.18% 13.25% 32.58%+0.24 +5.1 10
1936-08-17 @ HJK L 1-338.2 952 888 32.58% 13.25% 54.18%-0.24 -5.1 9
1936-08-23 VPS W 4-238.7 947 896 67.21% 13.00% 19.80%+1.13 +2.9 11
1936-08-23 @ HPS Helsinki L 2-438.7 896 947 19.80% 13.00% 67.21%-1.13 -2.9 9
1936-08-23 HJK D 0-050.7 859 893 58.05% 13.21% 28.74%+0.48 -0.7 10
1936-08-23 @ Sudet D 0-050.7 893 859 28.74% 13.21% 58.05%-0.48 +0.7 11
1936-08-23 Toverit Helsinki W 2-143.2 750 896 42.89% 13.23% 43.88%-0.39 +3.8 6
1936-08-23 @ TPS Turku L 1-243.2 896 750 43.88% 13.23% 42.89%+0.39 -3.8 10
1936-08-28 HJK W 3-027.9 950 893 67.70% 12.98% 19.33%+1.17 +5.2 13
1936-08-28 @ HPS Helsinki L 0-327.9 893 950 19.33% 12.98% 67.70%-1.17 -5.2 11
1936-08-30 Sudet D 2-257.9 892 859 65.49% 13.05% 21.45%+1.00 -0.7 11
1936-08-30 @ Toverit Helsinki D 2-257.9 859 892 21.45% 13.05% 65.49%-1.00 +0.7 11
1936-08-30 TPS Turku L 1-449.0 893 753 74.44% 12.60% 12.97%+1.81 -15.4 9
1936-08-30 @ VPS W 4-149.0 753 893 12.97% 12.60% 74.44%-1.81 +15.3 8
1936-09-01 Helsingfors W 1-036.3 888 954 53.99% 13.25% 32.76%+0.23 +3.1 13
1936-09-01 @ HJK L 0-136.3 954 888 32.76% 13.25% 53.99%-0.23 -3.1 11
1936-09-06 VPS W 2-138.1 859 878 59.85% 13.18% 26.97%+0.59 +2.4 13
1936-09-06 @ Sudet L 1-238.1 878 859 26.97% 13.18% 59.85%-0.59 -2.4 9
1936-09-06 IF Drott W 6-131.1 769 737 65.26% 13.06% 21.67%+0.98 +7.8 10
1936-09-06 @ TPS Turku L 1-631.1 737 769 21.67% 13.06% 65.26%-0.98 -7.8 2
1936-09-12 TPS Turku W 3-238.9 891 776 72.63% 12.73% 14.64%+1.62 +1.3 15
1936-09-12 @ HJK L 2-338.9 776 891 14.64% 12.73% 72.63%-1.62 -1.3 10
1936-09-13 Toverit Helsinki W 2-138.1 875 892 60.06% 13.18% 26.76%+0.61 +2.4 11
1936-09-13 @ VPS L 1-238.1 892 875 26.76% 13.18% 60.06%-0.61 -2.4 11
1936-09-13 Sudet L 2-355.7 951 862 70.59% 12.85% 16.56%+1.42 -5.6 11
1936-09-13 @ Helsingfors W 3-255.7 862 951 16.56% 12.85% 70.59%-1.42 +5.6 15
1936-09-13 HPS Helsinki L 1-239.7 729 955 32.16% 13.05% 54.79%-1.00 -2.9 2
1936-09-13 @ IF Drott W 2-139.7 955 729 54.79% 13.05% 32.16%+1.00 +2.9 15
1936-09-19 HJK L 3-457.0 889 893 61.54% 13.15% 25.30%+0.71 -4.8 11
1936-09-19 @ Toverit Helsinki W 4-357.0 893 889 25.30% 13.15% 61.54%-0.71 +4.8 17
1936-09-20 TPS Turku L 1-449.7 958 775 77.22% 12.34% 10.44%+2.15 -15.9 15
1936-09-20 @ HPS Helsinki W 4-149.7 775 958 10.44% 12.34% 77.22%-2.15 +15.9 12
1936-09-20 IF Drott L 0-148.6 867 727 74.52% 12.59% 12.89%+1.82 -6.7 15
1936-09-20 @ Sudet W 1-048.6 727 867 12.89% 12.59% 74.52%-1.82 +6.6 4
1936-09-20 Helsingfors D 2-257.9 878 945 53.75% 13.25% 33.01%+0.21 -0.3 12
1936-09-20 @ VPS D 2-257.9 945 878 33.01% 13.25% 53.75%-0.21 +0.3 12
1936-10-03 HPS Helsinki L 0-437.6 884 942 55.03% 13.24% 31.72%+0.29 -17.6 11
1936-10-03 @ Toverit Helsinki W 4-037.6 942 884 31.72% 13.24% 55.03%-0.29 +17.6 17
1936-10-04 VPS W 3-029.0 897 877 64.10% 13.09% 22.80%+0.89 +6.1 19
1936-10-04 @ HJK L 0-329.0 877 897 22.80% 13.09% 64.10%-0.89 -6.1 12
1936-10-04 Helsingfors L 1-634.8 733 946 33.86% 13.09% 53.05%-0.90 -11.6 4
1936-10-04 @ IF Drott W 6-134.8 946 733 53.05% 13.09% 33.86%+0.90 +11.7 14
1936-10-04 Sudet W 3-244.7 791 861 53.50% 13.25% 33.25%+0.20 +2.8 14
1936-10-04 @ TPS Turku L 2-344.7 861 791 33.25% 13.25% 53.50%-0.20 -2.8 15
1936-10-10 HPS Helsinki W 4-346.1 957 960 61.65% 13.15% 25.19%+0.72 +2.1 16
1936-10-10 @ Helsingfors L 3-446.1 960 957 25.19% 13.15% 61.65%-0.72 -2.1 17
1936-10-11 IF Drott D 0-050.9 867 722 74.82% 12.57% 12.61%+1.85 -1.6 12
1936-10-11 @ Toverit Helsinki D 0-050.9 722 867 12.61% 12.57% 74.82%-1.85 +1.6 5
1936-10-18 VPS W 3-242.3 865 871 61.26% 13.16% 25.58%+0.69 +2.2 14
1936-10-18 @ Toverit Helsinki L 2-342.3 871 865 25.58% 13.16% 61.26%-0.69 -2.2 12

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1936-09-20 10.44% TPS Turku 775 4 @ HPS Helsinki 958 1
2 1936-09-20 12.89% IF Drott 727 1 @ Sudet 867 0
3 1936-08-30 12.97% TPS Turku 753 4 @ VPS 893 1
4 1936-09-13 16.56% Sudet 862 3 @ Helsingfors 951 2
5 1936-06-10 18.10% Toverit Helsinki 886 3 @ Helsingfors 957 2
6 1936-05-17 23.58% TPS Turku 766 2 @ IF Drott 778 1
7 1936-09-19 25.30% HJK 893 4 @ Toverit Helsinki 889 3
8 1936-05-21 26.33% Toverit Helsinki 878 3 @ HJK 865 2
9 1936-10-03 31.72% HPS Helsinki 942 4 @ Toverit Helsinki 884 0
10 1936-06-07 36.19% HJK 859 3 @ IF Drott 767 2
11 1936-07-02 37.33% HJK 865 5 @ TPS Turku 765 1
12 1936-06-21 41.76% Toverit Helsinki 892 2 @ IF Drott 760 1
13 1936-07-05 41.80% VPS 888 4 @ IF Drott 756 1
14 1936-08-23 42.89% @ TPS Turku 750 2 Toverit Helsinki 896 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1936-05-10 23.94 Helsingfors 7 935 43.71% @ TPS Turku 0 790 43.06% 13.23%
2 1936-10-03 17.64 HPS Helsinki 4 942 31.72% @ Toverit Helsinki 0 884 55.03% 13.24%
3 1936-09-20 15.92 TPS Turku 4 775 10.44% @ HPS Helsinki 1 958 77.22% 12.34%
4 1936-08-30 15.35 TPS Turku 4 753 12.97% @ VPS 1 893 74.44% 12.60%
5 1936-07-02 13.30 HJK 5 865 37.33% @ TPS Turku 1 765 49.41% 13.26%
6 1936-10-04 11.66 Helsingfors 6 946 53.05% @ IF Drott 1 733 33.86% 13.09%
7 1936-07-05 9.47 VPS 4 888 41.80% @ IF Drott 1 756 44.95% 13.24%
8 1936-07-11 9.33 @ HJK 8 878 73.89% IF Drott 0 747 13.47% 12.64%
9 1936-06-01 8.97 @ VPS 9 874 71.33% IF Drott 1 776 15.86% 12.80%
10 1936-06-14 8.41 @ VPS 6 880 51.38% HPS Helsinki 2 965 35.36% 13.26%
11 1936-07-05 8.33 @ Sudet 4 851 47.98% HPS Helsinki 1 961 38.77% 13.26%
12 1936-09-06 7.78 @ TPS Turku 6 769 65.26% IF Drott 1 737 21.67% 13.06%
13 1936-09-20 6.66 IF Drott 1 727 12.89% @ Sudet 0 867 74.52% 12.59%
14 1936-10-04 6.12 @ HJK 3 897 64.10% VPS 0 877 22.80% 13.09%
15 1936-09-13 5.64 Sudet 3 862 16.56% @ Helsingfors 2 951 70.59% 12.85%
16 1936-06-10 5.50 Toverit Helsinki 3 886 18.10% @ Helsingfors 2 957 68.98% 12.92%
17 1936-05-17 5.33 TPS Turku 2 766 23.58% @ IF Drott 1 778 63.30% 13.11%
18 1936-08-28 5.24 @ HPS Helsinki 3 950 67.70% HJK 0 893 19.33% 12.98%
19 1936-08-17 5.05 @ HJK 3 888 54.18% HPS Helsinki 1 952 32.58% 13.25%
20 1936-05-21 4.83 Toverit Helsinki 3 878 26.33% @ HJK 2 865 60.49% 13.17%
21 1936-09-19 4.80 HJK 4 893 25.30% @ Toverit Helsinki 3 889 61.54% 13.15%
22 1936-05-10 4.56 @ Sudet 3 846 57.68% Toverit Helsinki 1 882 29.10% 13.22%
23 1936-06-22 4.53 @ HPS Helsinki 2 957 62.23% Helsingfors 0 954 24.63% 13.14%
24 1936-06-07 4.08 HJK 3 859 36.19% @ IF Drott 2 767 50.55% 13.26%
25 1936-06-21 3.87 Toverit Helsinki 2 892 41.76% @ IF Drott 1 760 45.00% 13.24%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1936-05-21 62.4 @ VPS 3 875 64.52% Sudet 3 851 22.40% 13.08%
2 1936-08-30 57.9 @ Toverit Helsinki 2 892 65.49% Sudet 2 859 21.45% 13.05%
3 1936-09-20 57.9 @ VPS 2 878 53.75% Helsingfors 2 945 33.01% 13.25%
4 1936-09-19 57.0 HJK 4 893 25.30% @ Toverit Helsinki 3 889 61.54% 13.15%
5 1936-09-13 55.7 Sudet 3 862 16.56% @ Helsingfors 2 951 70.59% 12.85%
6 1936-06-10 55.3 Toverit Helsinki 3 886 18.10% @ Helsingfors 2 957 68.98% 12.92%
7 1936-07-08 53.6 @ HPS Helsinki 1 953 67.80% Toverit Helsinki 1 896 19.22% 12.97%
8 1936-07-15 53.6 @ Toverit Helsinki 1 897 55.37% Helsingfors 1 952 31.39% 13.24%
9 1936-05-21 52.8 Toverit Helsinki 3 878 26.33% @ HJK 2 865 60.49% 13.17%
10 1936-10-11 50.9 @ Toverit Helsinki 0 867 74.82% IF Drott 0 722 12.61% 12.57%
11 1936-08-23 50.7 @ Sudet 0 859 58.05% HJK 0 893 28.74% 13.21%
12 1936-06-07 49.9 HJK 3 859 36.19% @ IF Drott 2 767 50.55% 13.26%
13 1936-09-20 49.7 TPS Turku 4 775 10.44% @ HPS Helsinki 1 958 77.22% 12.34%
14 1936-05-17 49.0 TPS Turku 2 766 23.58% @ IF Drott 1 778 63.30% 13.11%
15 1936-08-30 49.0 TPS Turku 4 753 12.97% @ VPS 1 893 74.44% 12.60%
16 1936-09-20 48.6 IF Drott 1 727 12.89% @ Sudet 0 867 74.52% 12.59%
17 1936-10-10 46.1 @ Helsingfors 4 957 61.65% HPS Helsinki 3 960 25.19% 13.15%
18 1936-10-04 44.7 @ TPS Turku 3 791 53.50% Sudet 2 861 33.25% 13.25%
19 1936-06-21 43.6 Toverit Helsinki 2 892 41.76% @ IF Drott 1 760 45.00% 13.24%
20 1936-08-23 43.2 @ TPS Turku 2 750 42.89% Toverit Helsinki 1 896 43.88% 13.23%
21 1936-10-18 42.3 @ Toverit Helsinki 3 865 61.26% VPS 2 871 25.58% 13.16%
22 1936-06-07 42.1 @ TPS Turku 2 764 46.79% VPS 1 883 39.96% 13.25%
23 1936-06-21 41.8 @ HJK 3 863 63.02% Sudet 2 853 23.86% 13.12%
24 1936-05-24 40.4 @ IF Drott 2 773 52.38% Sudet 1 851 34.37% 13.25%
25 1936-07-02 40.4 HJK 5 865 37.33% @ TPS Turku 1 765 49.41% 13.26%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1936-07-11 26.1 @ HJK 8 878 73.89% IF Drott 0 747 13.47% 12.64%
2 1936-08-28 27.9 @ HPS Helsinki 3 950 67.70% HJK 0 893 19.33% 12.98%
3 1936-06-14 28.3 @ Helsingfors 5 951 77.53% IF Drott 1 763 10.16% 12.31%
4 1936-06-01 28.5 @ VPS 9 874 71.33% IF Drott 1 776 15.86% 12.80%
5 1936-10-04 29.0 @ HJK 3 897 64.10% VPS 0 877 22.80% 13.09%
6 1936-06-07 30.7 @ HPS Helsinki 1 964 72.43% Sudet 0 852 14.83% 12.74%
7 1936-06-01 31.0 @ Toverit Helsinki 4 883 72.67% TPS Turku 1 767 14.61% 12.72%
8 1936-09-06 31.1 @ TPS Turku 6 769 65.26% IF Drott 1 737 21.67% 13.06%
9 1936-06-22 31.5 @ HPS Helsinki 2 957 62.23% Helsingfors 0 954 24.63% 13.14%
10 1936-05-03 33.0 @ HPS Helsinki 2 959 77.06% IF Drott 1 779 10.58% 12.36%
11 1936-07-05 33.3 @ Helsingfors 5 950 78.10% TPS Turku 2 751 9.65% 12.25%
12 1936-06-14 33.4 @ Sudet 3 850 70.03% TPS Turku 1 768 17.09% 12.87%
13 1936-05-10 34.6 Helsingfors 7 935 43.71% @ TPS Turku 0 790 43.06% 13.23%
14 1936-05-27 34.7 @ Helsingfors 2 959 71.35% HJK 1 860 15.85% 12.80%
15 1936-10-04 34.8 Helsingfors 6 946 53.05% @ IF Drott 1 733 33.86% 13.09%
16 1936-08-16 35.8 @ Helsingfors 2 952 67.52% VPS 1 898 19.49% 12.98%
17 1936-09-01 36.3 @ HJK 1 888 53.99% Helsingfors 0 954 32.76% 13.25%
18 1936-05-10 37.1 @ Sudet 3 846 57.68% Toverit Helsinki 1 882 29.10% 13.22%
19 1936-05-10 37.3 @ VPS 2 873 62.49% HJK 1 867 24.38% 13.13%
20 1936-05-24 37.5 HPS Helsinki 1 960 49.95% @ TPS Turku 0 771 36.90% 13.15%
21 1936-10-03 37.6 HPS Helsinki 4 942 31.72% @ Toverit Helsinki 0 884 55.03% 13.24%
22 1936-06-01 38.1 @ Sudet 1 848 47.75% Helsingfors 0 960 39.00% 13.25%
23 1936-09-06 38.1 @ Sudet 2 859 59.85% VPS 1 878 26.97% 13.18%
24 1936-09-13 38.1 @ VPS 2 875 60.06% Toverit Helsinki 1 892 26.76% 13.18%
25 1936-08-17 38.2 @ HJK 3 888 54.18% HPS Helsinki 1 952 32.58% 13.25%