2009-10 Luxembourg National Division Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Jeunesse Esch

57 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Jeunesse Esch

11.10 points above expected

57 points · 45.90 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Mondercange

10.51 points below expected

13 points · 23.51 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Jeunesse Esch	26	17	6	3	57	45	20	+25	45.90	+11.10
2	F91 Dudelange	26	16	6	4	54	62	23	+39	54.42	-0.42
3	Grevenmacher	26	13	4	9	43	46	40	+6	45.07	-2.07
4	Differdange 03	26	12	6	8	42	41	30	+11	39.73	+2.27
5	RM Hamm Benfica	26	11	8	7	41	50	29	+21	39.85	+1.15
6	Fola Esch	26	11	8	7	41	49	38	+11	37.46	+3.54
7	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	26	12	5	9	41	39	47	-8	33.41	+7.59
8	Etzella Ettelbruck	26	8	8	10	32	42	43	-1	34.30	-2.30
9	CS Petange	26	9	5	12	32	36	42	-6	32.45	-0.45
10	Swift Hesperange	26	8	5	13	29	33	42	-9	30.92	-1.92
11	Progres Niedercorn	26	6	10	10	28	39	44	-5	31.41	-3.41
12	UN Kaerjeng	26	7	7	12	28	28	36	-8	31.47	-3.47
13	Rumelange	26	7	1	18	22	27	63	-36	23.59	-1.59
14	Mondercange	26	2	7	17	13	18	58	-40	23.51	-10.51

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Jeunesse Esch	57	45.90	+11.10
2	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	41	33.41	+7.59
3	Fola Esch	41	37.46	+3.54
4	Differdange 03	42	39.73	+2.27
5	RM Hamm Benfica	41	39.85	+1.15

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Mondercange	13	23.51	-10.51
2	UN Kaerjeng	28	31.47	-3.47
3	Progres Niedercorn	28	31.41	-3.41
4	Etzella Ettelbruck	32	34.30	-2.30
5	Grevenmacher	43	45.07	-2.07

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	CS Petange	7	Aug 23 – Oct 18	1 in 2,258
2	Jeunesse Esch	6	Nov 22 – Mar 21	1 in 65
3	Fola Esch	4	Nov 22 – Mar 7	1 in 45
4	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3	Aug 30 – Sep 20	1 in 33
5	F91 Dudelange	6	Mar 7 – Apr 18	1 in 18

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Grevenmacher	3	Mar 27 – Apr 18	1 in 116
2	RM Hamm Benfica	3	Mar 21 – Apr 11	1 in 44
3	Etzella Ettelbruck	4	Nov 22 – Mar 7	1 in 36
4	UN Kaerjeng	4	Nov 22 – Mar 7	1 in 31
5	Rumelange	6	Apr 11 – May 21	1 in 26

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	7	Aug 30 – Oct 25	1 in 84
2	RM Hamm Benfica	11	Sep 27 – Mar 14	1 in 67
3	CS Petange	7	Aug 23 – Oct 18	1 in 46
4	Jeunesse Esch	9	Aug 2 – Oct 3	1 in 22
5	Progres Niedercorn	4	Aug 2 – Aug 22	1 in 12

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	F91 Dudelange	5	Sep 27 – Oct 31	1 in 140
2	Grevenmacher	5	Mar 13 – Apr 18	1 in 69
3	Mondercange	15	Aug 2 – Nov 29	1 in 63
4	CS Petange	9	Oct 25 – Mar 21	1 in 42
5	Etzella Ettelbruck	8	Aug 1 – Sep 27	1 in 38

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team	Elo	Season Pts	Elo Δ (5)	Points (5)	Expected (5)	Actual − Exp
Jeunesse Esch	1107	57	+6	10	9.9	+0.1
F91 Dudelange	1210	54	+19	10	11.0	-1.0
Grevenmacher	1043	43	-2	9	7.0	+2.0
Differdange 03	1036	42	+25	10	7.8	+2.2
RM Hamm Benfica	1046	41	+21	10	8.5	+1.5
Fola Esch	1024	41	+9	9	7.3	+1.7
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	934	41	-54	3	6.3	-3.3
Etzella Ettelbruck	975	32	+25	10	6.7	+3.3
CS Petange	921	32	-20	4	5.8	-1.8
Swift Hesperange	913	29	+5	6	6.2	-0.2
Progres Niedercorn	931	28	+3	9	7.2	+1.8
UN Kaerjeng	950	28	+18	9	5.4	+3.6
Rumelange	823	22	-32	0	4.4	-4.4
Mondercange	797	13	-21	1	3.6	-2.6

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Team	CP	D0	EE	FD	FE	GRE	JE	MON	PN	RHB	RFUL	RUM	SH	UK
CS Petange	—	0-1-1 2.36	1-1-0 2.49	0-0-2 1.22	0-0-2 2.38	2-0-0 1.68	0-1-1 1.73	2-0-0 3.63	1-1-0 2.57	0-0-2 2.04	1-0-1 2.48	0-0-2 3.31	1-0-1 3.00	1-1-0 2.74
Differdange 03	1-1-0 3.14	—	1-0-1 3.20	0-0-2 1.67	0-1-1 3.10	1-0-1 2.25	1-0-1 2.11	1-1-0 4.02	0-2-0 3.37	1-0-1 2.76	2-0-0 3.27	2-0-0 4.04	0-1-1 3.49	2-0-0 3.51
Etzella Ettelbruck	0-1-1 3.01	1-0-1 2.31	—	0-1-1 1.38	0-0-2 2.69	0-0-2 2.18	1-1-0 1.76	0-1-1 3.53	1-1-0 2.87	0-1-1 2.36	2-0-0 2.73	1-0-1 3.65	1-1-0 3.02	1-1-0 3.04
F91 Dudelange	2-0-0 4.42	2-0-0 3.89	1-1-0 4.22	—	1-1-0 4.10	1-0-1 3.60	1-1-0 3.38	2-0-0 4.95	1-0-1 4.34	1-0-1 3.86	1-1-0 4.26	1-1-0 4.79	2-0-0 4.38	0-1-1 4.52
Fola Esch	2-0-0 3.13	1-1-0 2.40	2-0-0 2.81	0-1-1 1.49	—	1-0-1 2.28	0-0-2 2.14	0-2-0 4.00	1-1-0 3.07	0-1-1 2.57	0-1-1 3.13	2-0-0 3.83	2-0-0 3.12	0-1-1 3.39
Grevenmacher	0-0-2 3.88	1-0-1 3.26	2-0-0 3.34	1-0-1 1.93	1-0-1 3.24	—	0-0-2 2.92	1-0-1 4.32	1-1-0 3.75	1-1-0 3.10	0-1-1 3.75	2-0-0 4.32	2-0-0 3.87	1-1-0 3.94
Jeunesse Esch	1-1-0 3.82	1-0-1 3.40	0-1-1 3.79	0-1-1 2.13	2-0-0 3.38	2-0-0 2.58	—	1-1-0 4.30	2-0-0 3.87	2-0-0 3.29	2-0-0 3.64	2-0-0 4.23	1-1-0 3.92	1-1-0 3.71
Mondercange	0-0-2 1.90	0-1-1 1.55	1-1-0 1.99	0-0-2 0.78	0-2-0 1.57	1-0-1 1.29	0-1-1 1.32	—	0-1-1 2.06	0-0-2 1.49	0-0-2 1.96	0-0-2 2.83	0-0-2 2.24	0-1-1 2.17
Progres Niedercorn	0-1-1 2.94	0-2-0 2.15	0-1-1 2.63	1-0-1 1.28	0-1-1 2.43	0-1-1 1.79	0-0-2 1.69	1-1-0 3.46	—	0-2-0 2.20	1-1-0 2.56	2-0-0 3.38	1-0-1 2.88	0-0-2 2.89
RM Hamm Benfica	2-0-0 3.48	1-0-1 2.74	1-1-0 3.15	1-0-1 1.69	1-1-0 2.93	0-1-1 2.40	0-0-2 2.22	2-0-0 4.09	0-2-0 3.31	—	0-1-1 3.19	1-0-1 3.93	0-2-0 3.51	2-0-0 3.43
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1-0-1 3.02	0-0-2 2.24	0-0-2 2.77	0-1-1 1.34	1-1-0 2.38	1-1-0 1.79	0-0-2 1.89	2-0-0 3.58	0-1-1 2.94	1-1-0 2.32	—	2-0-0 3.35	2-0-0 2.91	2-0-0 2.87
Rumelange	2-0-0 2.20	0-0-2 1.54	1-0-1 1.89	0-1-1 0.91	0-0-2 1.72	0-0-2 1.29	0-0-2 1.38	2-0-0 2.67	0-0-2 2.14	1-0-1 1.65	0-0-2 2.16	—	0-0-2 2.10	1-0-1 2.08
Swift Hesperange	1-0-1 2.51	1-1-0 2.03	0-1-1 2.49	0-0-2 1.24	0-0-2 2.38	0-0-2 1.68	0-1-1 1.64	2-0-0 3.28	1-0-1 2.63	0-2-0 2.01	0-0-2 2.60	2-0-0 3.42	—	1-0-1 2.54
UN Kaerjeng	0-1-1 2.76	0-0-2 2.01	0-1-1 2.47	1-1-0 1.13	1-1-0 2.13	0-1-1 1.62	0-1-1 1.83	1-1-0 3.34	2-0-0 2.61	0-0-2 2.09	0-0-2 2.65	1-0-1 3.44	1-0-1 2.96	—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.75	+9.3
Allowed	0.73	-8.5
Differential	0.84	+5.1

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	6.59%	7.97%	5.77%	3.30%	1.10%	1.65%	26.37%
1	7.97%	11.54%	5.22%	4.67%	3.02%	1.10%	33.52%
2	5.77%	5.22%	4.40%	0.82%	1.65%	1.37%	19.23%
3	3.30%	4.67%	0.82%	1.10%	0.27%	—	10.16%
4	1.10%	3.02%	1.65%	0.27%	—	0.27%	6.32%
5+	1.65%	1.10%	1.37%	—	0.27%	—	4.40%
Total	26.37%	33.52%	19.23%	10.16%	6.32%	4.40%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.52	1.52	+0.00
SD	1.47	1.47	2.20
CV	0.96	0.96	—
Max	9	9	+9
Min	0	0	-9

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	30.77%
1	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	15.38%	3.85%	—	38.46%
2	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%	7.69%
3	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	26.92%	30.77%	15.38%	19.23%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.38	1.62	-0.23
SD	1.44	1.63	2.10
CV	1.04	1.01	—
Max	5	7	+3
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	30.77%
1	11.54%	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	34.62%
2	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	—	15.38%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	34.62%	38.46%	11.54%	11.54%	—	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.58	1.15	+0.42
SD	1.81	1.26	2.48
CV	1.15	1.09	—
Max	7	5	+7
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
1	11.54%	19.23%	11.54%	11.54%	—	—	53.85%
2	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	7.69%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	15.38%	38.46%	23.08%	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.62	1.65	-0.04
SD	1.39	1.26	1.59
CV	0.86	0.76	—
Max	6	5	+5
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
1	11.54%	11.54%	—	—	—	—	23.08%
2	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	—	7.69%	—	26.92%
3	7.69%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
4	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	11.54%	—	—	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	46.15%	38.46%	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.38	0.88	+1.50
SD	1.94	1.18	2.42
CV	0.81	1.33	—
Max	9	4	+9
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
1	7.69%	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	30.77%
2	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	11.54%
3	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
4	—	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%	—	7.69%
Total	15.38%	42.31%	26.92%	11.54%	3.85%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.88	1.46	+0.42
SD	1.66	1.03	1.75
CV	0.88	0.70	—
Max	5	4	+5
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	—	3.85%	26.92%
1	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
2	11.54%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	30.77%
3	—	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	19.23%	38.46%	26.92%	7.69%	—	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.77	1.54	+0.23
SD	1.50	1.33	2.18
CV	0.85	0.87	—
Max	5	5	+4
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	—	—	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
1	19.23%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	34.62%
2	19.23%	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	30.77%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	57.69%	26.92%	7.69%	—	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.73	0.77	+0.96
SD	1.37	1.27	1.82
CV	0.79	1.66	—
Max	5	5	+4
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	15.38%	19.23%	—	3.85%	3.85%	46.15%
1	3.85%	19.23%	7.69%	—	—	7.69%	38.46%
2	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	3.85%	15.38%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.69%	38.46%	30.77%	—	7.69%	15.38%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	0.69	2.23	-1.54
SD	0.74	2.01	2.08
CV	1.06	0.90	—
Max	2	9	+1
Min	0	0	-9

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	—	23.08%
1	—	15.38%	11.54%	3.85%	7.69%	—	38.46%
2	—	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	—	15.38%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	11.54%	30.77%	42.31%	7.69%	7.69%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.50	1.69	-0.19
SD	1.30	1.05	1.65
CV	0.87	0.62	—
Max	4	4	+3
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	15.38%	—	7.69%	—	—	30.77%
1	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	—	—	19.23%
2	3.85%	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	15.38%
3	11.54%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
4	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	34.62%	34.62%	15.38%	15.38%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.92	1.12	+0.81
SD	1.96	1.07	2.23
CV	1.02	0.96	—
Max	7	3	+6
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	15.38%
1	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	—	3.85%	7.69%	38.46%
2	3.85%	11.54%	11.54%	—	—	—	26.92%
3	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	—	19.23%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	26.92%	30.77%	19.23%	3.85%	7.69%	11.54%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.50	1.81	-0.31
SD	0.99	1.94	2.45
CV	0.66	1.07	—
Max	3	7	+3
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	38.46%
1	3.85%	—	7.69%	7.69%	7.69%	—	26.92%
2	7.69%	7.69%	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	26.92%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	19.23%	15.38%	11.54%	23.08%	23.08%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.04	2.42	-1.38
SD	1.00	1.72	2.33
CV	0.96	0.71	—
Max	3	6	+3
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	11.54%	7.69%	—	—	—	30.77%
1	—	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	15.38%	—	34.62%
2	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	19.23%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	23.08%	34.62%	15.38%	11.54%	15.38%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.27	1.62	-0.35
SD	1.22	1.39	1.98
CV	0.96	0.86	—
Max	4	4	+3
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	11.54%	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	34.62%
1	7.69%	15.38%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	—	42.31%
2	7.69%	—	—	—	—	3.85%	11.54%
3	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
4	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	30.77%	30.77%	19.23%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.08	1.38	-0.31
SD	1.16	1.36	1.81
CV	1.08	0.98	—
Max	4	5	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
F91 Dudelange	1210	54	54.42	-0.42	48.0%	32	45	50	55	59	64	69
Jeunesse Esch	1107	57	45.90	+11.10	97.0%	28	34	42	46	51	57	64
RM Hamm Benfica	1046	41	39.85	+1.15	62.0%	24	28	35	40	44	52	56
Grevenmacher	1043	43	45.07	-2.07	39.0%	29	34	42	46	49	54	59
Differdange 03	1036	42	39.73	+2.27	67.0%	22	28	35	41	44	51	59
Fola Esch	1024	41	37.46	+3.54	70.0%	18	25	32	38	43	49	52
Etzella Ettelbruck	975	32	34.30	-2.30	35.0%	19	24	30	34	38	46	48
UN Kaerjeng	950	28	31.47	-3.47	30.0%	15	20	27	31	35	44	54
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	934	41	33.41	+7.59	89.0%	16	24	29	33	37	43	47
Progres Niedercorn	931	28	31.41	-3.41	31.0%	19	23	27	31	35	40	45
CS Petange	921	32	32.45	-0.45	55.0%	13	22	28	32	38	44	52
Swift Hesperange	913	29	30.92	-1.92	40.0%	17	20	26	31	35	43	48
Rumelange	823	22	23.59	-1.59	40.0%	10	15	19	23	27	33	41
Mondercange	797	13	23.51	-10.51	5.0%	9	13	20	24	28	32	41

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 7% * Slight Edge: 7% to 11.5% * Clear Edge: 11.5% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+7.14%

Slight Edge

41.76%23.63%34.62%

Elo Value

Home Edge: 24.86 Elo pts.

137 Elo

0.007 goals per Elo point

0400

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.16 goals

Neutral

-2+0.18+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin: Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.05 * Tight Race: 0.05 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.27 * Runaway: 0.27 and up.

Title-Race Openness

1.9

One-Team Race

123410

Champion Preseason Odds

10%

Jeunesse Esch, 2nd of 14

LongshotFavorite

Title Margin

Expected

0.12/gm

Tight Race

00.250.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 5.17 * Some Luck: 5.17 to 7.76 * Lucky: 7.76 to 10.35 * Wild Swing: 10.35 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.66 * Close: 1.66 to 2.49 * Off: 2.49 to 3.32 * Way Off: 3.32 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

5.00 points

As Expected

06.4716

Average Finish Error

Expected

0.71

Pinpoint

02.085

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 96.43%

97.00%

Jeunesse Esch

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 3.57%

5.00%

Mondercange

050

Season Outliers

Expected

1 of 14

Minimal Outliers

01.47

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.17 * Even: 0.17 to 0.19 * Top-Heavy: 0.19 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully: Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.65 * Moderate Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Strong Separation: 1.85 to 2.05 * Wide Separation: 2.05 and up.
Interquartile Edge: Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 68% * Slight Edge: 68% to 72.5% * Clear Edge: 72.5% to 78% * Wide Edge: 78% and up.
Best vs. Worst: Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 89.5% * Clear Edge: 89.5% to 92% * Strong Edge: 92% to 95% * Dominant: 95% and up.
Close Games: Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 49% * Some Drama: 49% to 53% * Frequent: 53% to 56% * Very Frequent: 56% and up.
Blowouts: Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 23% * Occasional: 23% to 26% * Frequent: 26% to 28% * Very Frequent: 28% and up.

Gini Index

0.18

Even

00.170.5

Noll-Scully

Elo SD: 108.65

1.77

Moderate Separation

11.651.852.052.5

Interquartile Edge

66%

Even

50%68%78%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline

91%

Clear Edge

50%91%100%

Close Games

Expected

53%

Some Drama

0%51%100%

Blowouts

Expected

23%

Occasional

0%26%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.35 * Slight Separation: 0.35 to 0.39 * Notable Separation: 0.39 to 0.44 * Lopsided: 0.44 and up.
Strangeness: How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.43 * Some Carryover: 0.43 to 0.62 * Strong Carryover: 0.62 to 0.73 * Near-Lock: 0.73 and up.
Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24% * Upset-Prone: 24% to 26.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 26.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 18% * As Expected: 18% to 20.5% * Shaky Favorites: 20.5% to 23.5% * Very Shaky: 23.5% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.59

Predictable

00.602

Matchup Imbalance

0.33

Very Even

00.350.5

Strangeness

Expected

0.64

Very Predictable

01.002

Repeatability

0.87

Near-Lock

00.430.621

Upset Rate

Expected

25%

Upset-Prone

0%26%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

18%

As Expected

0%22%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.13 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.13 to 0.19 * Above Noise: 0.19 to 0.26 * Well Above Noise: 0.26 and up.

Probability calibration

0.98

Excellent

0.010.050.10.51

Calibration slope

Ideal

1.21

Underconfident

0.51.001.5

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.078

Well Within Noise

00.1280.3

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Jeunesse Esch	10.00%	33.00%	21.00%	13.00%	7.00%	6.00%	4.00%	2.00%	3.00%	—	1.00%	—	—	—
F91 Dudelange	71.00%	19.00%	4.00%	3.00%	—	1.00%	1.00%	—	—	1.00%	—	—	—	—
Grevenmacher	10.00%	22.00%	21.00%	21.00%	8.00%	5.00%	5.00%	1.00%	3.00%	3.00%	—	1.00%	—	—
Differdange 03	1.00%	6.00%	16.00%	15.00%	14.00%	17.00%	10.00%	6.00%	3.00%	6.00%	3.00%	2.00%	1.00%	—
RM Hamm Benfica	5.00%	8.00%	9.00%	21.00%	12.00%	10.00%	13.00%	4.00%	8.00%	7.00%	2.00%	1.00%	—	—
Fola Esch	2.00%	6.00%	12.00%	8.00%	15.00%	12.00%	6.00%	10.00%	8.00%	11.00%	4.00%	4.00%	1.00%	1.00%
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1.00%	—	2.00%	3.00%	10.00%	11.00%	9.00%	14.00%	9.00%	11.00%	16.00%	6.00%	6.00%	2.00%
Etzella Ettelbruck	—	2.00%	5.00%	3.00%	9.00%	12.00%	16.00%	13.00%	12.00%	6.00%	6.00%	11.00%	4.00%	1.00%
CS Petange	—	1.00%	5.00%	2.00%	12.00%	5.00%	8.00%	11.00%	9.00%	13.00%	10.00%	14.00%	5.00%	5.00%
Swift Hesperange	—	1.00%	2.00%	3.00%	8.00%	3.00%	9.00%	11.00%	10.00%	10.00%	13.00%	13.00%	10.00%	7.00%
Progres Niedercorn	—	—	1.00%	3.00%	2.00%	8.00%	13.00%	14.00%	8.00%	12.00%	15.00%	14.00%	7.00%	3.00%
UN Kaerjeng	—	2.00%	2.00%	4.00%	2.00%	8.00%	5.00%	9.00%	20.00%	13.00%	11.00%	4.00%	12.00%	8.00%
Rumelange	—	—	—	1.00%	—	2.00%	—	2.00%	5.00%	4.00%	7.00%	15.00%	25.00%	39.00%
Mondercange	—	—	—	—	1.00%	—	1.00%	3.00%	2.00%	3.00%	12.00%	15.00%	29.00%	34.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team	Same level	Qualified for relegation playoff	Direct relegation
F91 Dudelange	100%	—	—
Grevenmacher	99.00%	1.00%	—
Jeunesse Esch	100%	—	—
RM Hamm Benfica	99.00%	1.00%	—
Differdange 03	97.00%	2.00%	1.00%
Fola Esch	94.00%	4.00%	2.00%
Etzella Ettelbruck	84.00%	11.00%	5.00%
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	86.00%	6.00%	8.00%
CS Petange	76.00%	14.00%	10.00%
Progres Niedercorn	76.00%	14.00%	10.00%
Swift Hesperange	70.00%	13.00%	17.00%
UN Kaerjeng	76.00%	4.00%	20.00%
Mondercange	22.00%	15.00%	63.00%
Rumelange	21.00%	15.00%	64.00%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
2009-08-01	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 3-1	39.3	1074	975	54.23%	23.08%	22.69%	+0.91	+5.9	3
2009-08-01	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-3	39.3	975	1074	22.69%	23.08%	54.23%	-0.91	-5.9	0
2009-08-02	Differdange 03	L 0-1	39.9	942	1018	30.54%	24.70%	44.76%	-0.38	-4.7	0
2009-08-02	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 1-0	39.9	1018	942	44.76%	24.70%	30.54%	+0.38	+4.7	3
2009-08-02	F91 Dudelange	L 1-3	38.1	980	1162	19.81%	21.99%	58.20%	-1.15	-5.2	0
2009-08-02	@ Fola Esch	W 3-1	38.1	1162	980	58.20%	21.99%	19.81%	+1.15	+5.2	3
2009-08-02	RM Hamm Benfica	L 0-1	39.7	914	996	29.97%	24.63%	45.40%	-0.41	-4.6	0
2009-08-02	@ CS Petange	W 1-0	39.7	996	914	45.40%	24.63%	29.97%	+0.41	+4.6	3
2009-08-02	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	36.7	883	1042	21.71%	22.75%	55.54%	-0.98	-3.5	0
2009-08-02	@ Rumelange	W 1-0	36.7	1042	883	55.54%	22.75%	21.71%	+0.98	+3.5	3
2009-08-02	Progres Niedercorn	D 1-1	52.5	890	950	32.66%	24.89%	42.44%	-0.26	+0.3	1
2009-08-02	@ Mondercange	D 1-1	52.5	950	890	42.44%	24.89%	32.66%	+0.26	-0.3	1
2009-08-02	Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	41.9	963	920	46.89%	24.45%	28.66%	+0.49	-12.4	0
2009-08-02	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 2-0	41.9	920	963	28.66%	24.45%	46.89%	-0.49	+12.4	3
2009-08-08	RM Hamm Benfica	W 3-0	29.7	1167	1000	62.21%	20.65%	17.15%	+1.40	+7.5	6
2009-08-08	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-3	29.7	1000	1167	17.15%	20.65%	62.21%	-1.40	-7.5	3
2009-08-08	Fola Esch	D 1-1	52.4	949	975	37.32%	25.06%	37.62%	-0.01	+0.0	2
2009-08-08	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 1-1	52.4	975	949	37.62%	25.06%	37.32%	+0.01	-0.0	1
2009-08-08	Grevenmacher	L 1-3	39.3	932	1080	22.79%	23.11%	54.10%	-0.90	-5.9	3
2009-08-08	@ Swift Hesperange	W 3-1	39.3	1080	932	54.10%	23.11%	22.79%	+0.90	+5.9	6
2009-08-08	Mondercange	D 0-0	49.0	969	890	51.72%	23.64%	24.63%	+0.76	-0.9	1
2009-08-08	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 0-0	49.0	890	969	24.63%	23.64%	51.72%	-0.76	+0.9	2
2009-08-08	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 5-1	34.8	1046	937	55.41%	22.78%	21.81%	+0.98	+10.4	6
2009-08-08	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-5	34.8	937	1046	21.81%	22.78%	55.41%	-0.98	-10.4	0
2009-08-08	Rumelange	L 1-3	46.5	910	879	45.25%	24.65%	30.10%	+0.40	-10.4	0
2009-08-08	@ CS Petange	W 3-1	46.5	879	910	30.10%	24.65%	45.25%	-0.40	+10.4	3
2009-08-08	UN Kaerjeng	W 2-1	42.8	1023	950	50.90%	23.81%	25.29%	+0.71	+3.8	6
2009-08-08	@ Differdange 03	L 1-2	42.8	950	1023	25.29%	23.81%	50.90%	-0.71	-3.8	0
2009-08-16	Differdange 03	W 2-0	35.8	1086	1027	49.16%	24.12%	26.72%	+0.62	+7.9	9
2009-08-16	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-2	35.8	1027	1086	26.72%	24.12%	49.16%	-0.62	-7.9	6
2009-08-16	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 5-4	54.7	975	968	41.99%	24.92%	33.09%	+0.23	+4.3	4
2009-08-16	@ Fola Esch	L 4-5	54.7	968	975	33.09%	24.92%	41.99%	-0.23	-4.3	1
2009-08-16	Jeunesse Esch	D 0-0	48.8	946	1056	26.65%	24.10%	49.24%	-0.62	+0.8	1
2009-08-16	@ UN Kaerjeng	D 0-0	48.8	1056	946	49.24%	24.10%	26.65%	+0.62	-0.8	7
2009-08-16	Progres Niedercorn	D 3-3	61.7	993	949	47.01%	24.44%	28.55%	+0.50	-0.4	4
2009-08-16	@ RM Hamm Benfica	D 3-3	61.7	949	993	28.55%	24.44%	47.01%	-0.50	+0.3	3
2009-08-16	Rumelange	W 3-0	34.5	927	890	46.14%	24.55%	29.31%	+0.45	+12.4	3
2009-08-16	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	34.5	890	927	29.31%	24.55%	46.14%	-0.45	-12.4	3
2009-08-16	Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	38.8	891	927	35.95%	25.04%	39.01%	-0.08	-10.1	2
2009-08-16	@ Mondercange	W 2-0	38.8	927	891	39.01%	25.04%	35.95%	+0.08	+10.1	6
2009-08-16	CS Petange	W 2-0	28.6	1175	899	73.09%	15.92%	10.99%	+2.19	+3.1	9
2009-08-16	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	28.6	899	1175	10.99%	15.92%	73.09%	-2.19	-3.1	0
2009-08-22	F91 Dudelange	W 4-2	54.6	950	1178	16.37%	20.18%	63.45%	-1.49	+12.3	6
2009-08-22	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 2-4	54.6	1178	950	63.45%	20.18%	16.37%	+1.49	-12.3	9
2009-08-23	RM Hamm Benfica	D 1-1	52.4	964	992	36.98%	25.06%	37.96%	-0.02	+0.0	2
2009-08-23	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	52.4	992	964	37.96%	25.06%	36.98%	+0.02	-0.0	5
2009-08-23	Fola Esch	L 0-1	41.4	937	980	34.93%	25.01%	40.05%	-0.13	-5.2	6
2009-08-23	@ Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	41.4	980	937	40.05%	25.01%	34.93%	+0.13	+5.2	7
2009-08-23	Grevenmacher	W 2-0	39.9	1055	1094	35.52%	25.03%	39.45%	-0.10	+10.8	10
2009-08-23	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	39.9	1094	1055	39.45%	25.03%	35.52%	+0.10	-10.8	9
2009-08-23	Mondercange	W 1-0	35.7	1019	881	58.88%	21.78%	19.34%	+1.19	+3.1	9
2009-08-23	@ Differdange 03	L 0-1	35.7	881	1019	19.34%	21.78%	58.88%	-1.19	-3.1	2
2009-08-23	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 4-1	42.6	896	939	34.93%	25.01%	40.06%	-0.13	+13.4	3
2009-08-23	@ CS Petange	L 1-4	42.6	939	896	40.06%	25.01%	34.93%	+0.13	-13.4	3
2009-08-23	UN Kaerjeng	L 2-3	49.7	877	947	31.38%	24.79%	43.84%	-0.33	-4.3	3
2009-08-23	@ Rumelange	W 3-2	49.7	947	877	43.84%	24.79%	31.38%	+0.33	+4.3	4
2009-08-29	Differdange 03	D 1-1	52.5	985	1022	35.72%	25.04%	39.24%	-0.09	+0.1	8
2009-08-29	@ Fola Esch	D 1-1	52.5	1022	985	39.24%	25.04%	35.72%	+0.09	-0.1	10
2009-08-29	CS Petange	L 0-1	45.1	962	910	48.22%	24.27%	27.51%	+0.56	-6.7	6
2009-08-29	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 1-0	45.1	910	962	27.51%	24.27%	48.22%	-0.56	+6.7	6
2009-08-30	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	54.2	1166	964	65.90%	19.20%	14.90%	+1.65	-1.6	10
2009-08-30	@ F91 Dudelange	D 1-1	54.2	964	1166	14.90%	19.20%	65.90%	-1.65	+1.6	3
2009-08-30	Jeunesse Esch	D 1-1	53.4	878	1066	19.28%	21.75%	58.97%	-1.19	+1.2	3
2009-08-30	@ Mondercange	D 1-1	53.4	1066	878	58.97%	21.75%	19.28%	+1.19	-1.2	11
2009-08-30	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-3	46.3	951	926	44.61%	24.71%	30.67%	+0.37	-10.3	4
2009-08-30	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 3-1	46.3	926	951	30.67%	24.71%	44.61%	-0.37	+10.3	6
2009-08-30	Rumelange	W 4-1	33.1	1083	873	66.78%	18.83%	14.38%	+1.72	+5.2	12
2009-08-30	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-4	33.1	873	1083	14.38%	18.83%	66.78%	-1.72	-5.2	3
2009-08-30	Swift Hesperange	D 0-0	48.8	992	931	49.35%	24.09%	26.57%	+0.63	-0.8	6
2009-08-30	@ RM Hamm Benfica	D 0-0	48.8	931	992	26.57%	24.09%	49.35%	-0.63	+0.8	7
2009-09-13	F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	31.4	932	1164	16.13%	20.03%	63.84%	-1.51	-4.8	7
2009-09-13	@ Swift Hesperange	W 2-0	31.4	1164	932	63.84%	20.03%	16.13%	+1.51	+4.8	13
2009-09-13	RM Hamm Benfica	W 1-0	39.8	1022	992	45.25%	24.65%	30.10%	+0.40	+4.6	13
2009-09-13	@ Differdange 03	L 0-1	39.8	992	1022	30.10%	24.65%	45.25%	-0.40	-4.6	6
2009-09-13	Fola Esch	W 1-0	37.8	1065	985	51.84%	23.62%	24.54%	+0.77	+3.9	14
2009-09-13	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	37.8	985	1065	24.54%	23.62%	51.84%	-0.77	-3.9	8
2009-09-13	Grevenmacher	W 2-1	51.4	936	1089	22.35%	22.97%	54.68%	-0.93	+7.0	9
2009-09-13	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-2	51.4	1089	936	54.68%	22.97%	22.35%	+0.93	-7.0	12
2009-09-13	Mondercange	W 2-0	38.7	868	879	39.42%	25.03%	35.54%	+0.10	+10.0	6
2009-09-13	@ Rumelange	L 0-2	38.7	879	868	35.54%	25.03%	39.42%	-0.10	-10.0	3
2009-09-13	Progres Niedercorn	D 2-2	57.5	966	955	42.49%	24.89%	32.62%	+0.26	-0.2	4
2009-09-13	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 2-2	57.5	955	966	32.62%	24.89%	42.49%	-0.26	+0.2	7
2009-09-13	UN Kaerjeng	W 3-1	44.3	916	941	37.46%	25.06%	37.48%	+0.00	+9.0	9
2009-09-13	@ CS Petange	L 1-3	44.3	941	916	37.48%	25.06%	37.46%	+0.00	-9.0	4
2009-09-20	Differdange 03	W 3-1	37.7	1169	1026	59.41%	21.61%	18.98%	+1.22	+5.0	16
2009-09-20	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-3	37.7	1026	1169	18.98%	21.61%	59.41%	-1.22	-5.0	13
2009-09-20	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	39.7	987	1069	29.86%	24.62%	45.52%	-0.42	-4.6	6
2009-09-20	@ RM Hamm Benfica	W 1-0	39.7	1069	987	45.52%	24.62%	29.86%	+0.42	+4.6	17
2009-09-20	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-2	44.7	869	943	30.86%	24.73%	44.41%	-0.36	-4.5	3
2009-09-20	@ Mondercange	W 2-1	44.7	943	869	44.41%	24.73%	30.86%	+0.36	+4.5	12
2009-09-20	Rumelange	W 4-2	43.1	981	878	54.72%	22.96%	22.32%	+0.93	+5.2	11
2009-09-20	@ Fola Esch	L 2-4	43.1	878	981	22.32%	22.96%	54.72%	-0.93	-5.2	6
2009-09-20	Swift Hesperange	L 1-4	44.0	955	927	44.94%	24.68%	30.38%	+0.39	-14.6	7
2009-09-20	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 4-1	44.0	927	955	30.38%	24.68%	44.94%	-0.39	+14.6	10
2009-09-20	UN Kaerjeng	W 5-2	38.1	1082	932	60.19%	21.35%	18.45%	+1.27	+5.9	15
2009-09-20	@ Grevenmacher	L 2-5	38.1	932	1082	18.45%	21.35%	60.19%	-1.27	-5.9	4
2009-09-20	CS Petange	L 2-4	50.9	966	925	46.59%	24.49%	28.91%	+0.48	-9.5	4
2009-09-20	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 4-2	50.9	925	966	28.91%	24.49%	46.59%	-0.48	+9.5	12
2009-09-27	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 2-2	57.5	942	956	39.03%	25.04%	35.93%	+0.08	-0.1	11
2009-09-27	@ Swift Hesperange	D 2-2	57.5	956	942	35.93%	25.04%	39.03%	-0.08	+0.1	5
2009-09-27	F91 Dudelange	D 1-1	52.7	1074	1174	27.70%	24.30%	48.00%	-0.55	+0.6	18
2009-09-27	@ Jeunesse Esch	D 1-1	52.7	1174	1074	48.00%	24.30%	27.70%	+0.55	-0.6	17
2009-09-27	RM Hamm Benfica	L 0-6	33.1	873	982	26.67%	24.11%	49.22%	-0.62	-21.9	6
2009-09-27	@ Rumelange	W 6-0	33.1	982	873	49.22%	24.11%	26.67%	+0.62	+21.9	9
2009-09-27	Fola Esch	D 2-2	57.5	948	986	35.52%	25.03%	39.45%	-0.10	+0.1	13
2009-09-27	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 2-2	57.5	986	948	39.45%	25.03%	35.52%	+0.10	-0.1	12
2009-09-27	Grevenmacher	W 2-0	43.8	935	1087	22.34%	22.97%	54.70%	-0.93	+14.0	15
2009-09-27	@ CS Petange	L 0-2	43.8	1087	935	54.70%	22.97%	22.34%	+0.93	-14.0	15
2009-09-27	Mondercange	D 1-1	52.7	926	865	49.45%	24.07%	26.48%	+0.63	-0.7	5
2009-09-27	@ UN Kaerjeng	D 1-1	52.7	865	926	26.48%	24.07%	49.45%	-0.63	+0.7	4
2009-09-27	Progres Niedercorn	D 1-1	52.9	1022	941	51.91%	23.60%	24.48%	+0.77	-0.8	14
2009-09-27	@ Differdange 03	D 1-1	52.9	941	1022	24.48%	23.60%	51.91%	-0.77	+0.8	8
2009-10-03	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	34.9	942	1074	24.28%	23.55%	52.17%	-0.79	-7.3	8
2009-10-03	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 2-0	34.9	1074	942	52.17%	23.55%	24.28%	+0.79	+7.3	21
2009-10-04	Differdange 03	W 1-0	43.8	956	1021	32.04%	24.85%	43.12%	-0.29	+6.1	8
2009-10-04	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-1	43.8	1021	956	43.12%	24.85%	32.04%	+0.29	-6.1	14
2009-10-04	Grevenmacher	L 1-5	33.0	865	1073	17.78%	21.00%	61.21%	-1.34	-8.5	4
2009-10-04	@ Mondercange	W 5-1	33.0	1073	865	61.21%	21.00%	17.78%	+1.34	+8.5	18
2009-10-04	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	52.7	1004	948	48.78%	24.18%	27.04%	+0.59	-0.7	10
2009-10-04	@ RM Hamm Benfica	D 1-1	52.7	948	1004	27.04%	24.18%	48.78%	-0.59	+0.6	14
2009-10-04	Rumelange	D 0-0	51.9	1173	851	77.15%	13.84%	9.01%	+2.54	-2.4	18
2009-10-04	@ F91 Dudelange	D 0-0	51.9	851	1173	9.01%	13.84%	77.15%	-2.54	+2.4	7
2009-10-04	UN Kaerjeng	D 0-0	48.8	986	926	49.30%	24.10%	26.61%	+0.62	-0.8	13
2009-10-04	@ Fola Esch	D 0-0	48.8	926	986	26.61%	24.10%	49.30%	-0.62	+0.8	6
2009-10-04	CS Petange	L 1-3	45.0	942	949	40.04%	25.02%	34.95%	+0.13	-9.4	11
2009-10-04	@ Swift Hesperange	W 3-1	45.0	949	942	34.95%	25.02%	40.04%	-0.13	+9.4	18
2009-10-18	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-2	51.8	1081	962	56.68%	22.44%	20.89%	+1.05	-7.2	21
2009-10-18	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 2-1	51.8	962	1081	20.89%	22.44%	56.68%	-1.05	+7.2	11
2009-10-18	F91 Dudelange	D 2-2	58.9	948	1171	16.75%	20.42%	62.83%	-1.44	+1.1	15
2009-10-18	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 2-2	58.9	1171	948	62.83%	20.42%	16.75%	+1.44	-1.1	19
2009-10-18	RM Hamm Benfica	L 0-1	39.9	926	1004	30.46%	24.69%	44.85%	-0.38	-4.7	6
2009-10-18	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 1-0	39.9	1004	926	44.85%	24.69%	30.46%	+0.38	+4.7	13
2009-10-18	Fola Esch	W 2-0	34.3	1082	985	53.91%	23.16%	22.93%	+0.89	+6.9	21
2009-10-18	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-2	34.3	985	1082	22.93%	23.16%	53.91%	-0.89	-6.9	13
2009-10-18	Mondercange	W 5-2	39.8	958	857	54.51%	23.01%	22.48%	+0.92	+7.2	21
2009-10-18	@ CS Petange	L 2-5	39.8	857	958	22.48%	23.01%	54.51%	-0.92	-7.2	4
2009-10-18	Progres Niedercorn	L 0-3	34.7	853	934	29.95%	24.63%	45.42%	-0.41	-12.6	7
2009-10-18	@ Rumelange	W 3-0	34.7	934	853	45.42%	24.63%	29.95%	+0.41	+12.6	11
2009-10-18	Swift Hesperange	D 1-1	52.9	1015	932	52.09%	23.57%	24.34%	+0.78	-0.9	15
2009-10-18	@ Differdange 03	D 1-1	52.9	932	1015	24.34%	23.57%	52.09%	-0.78	+0.8	12
2009-10-24	Jeunesse Esch	D 0-0	49.1	933	1074	23.45%	23.32%	53.23%	-0.85	+1.0	13
2009-10-24	@ Swift Hesperange	D 0-0	49.1	1074	933	53.23%	23.32%	23.45%	+0.85	-1.0	22
2009-10-25	Grevenmacher	D 2-2	57.6	1008	1089	30.04%	24.64%	45.31%	-0.41	+0.3	14
2009-10-25	@ RM Hamm Benfica	D 2-2	57.6	1089	1008	45.31%	24.64%	30.04%	+0.41	-0.3	22
2009-10-25	Mondercange	D 1-1	53.3	978	850	57.81%	22.11%	20.08%	+1.12	-1.2	14
2009-10-25	@ Fola Esch	D 1-1	53.3	850	978	20.08%	22.11%	57.81%	-1.12	+1.2	5
2009-10-25	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 2-2	57.5	947	949	40.70%	24.99%	34.31%	+0.16	-0.1	12
2009-10-25	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 2-2	57.5	949	947	34.31%	24.99%	40.70%	-0.16	+0.1	16
2009-10-25	Rumelange	L 1-2	52.0	969	840	57.83%	22.10%	20.07%	+1.12	-7.4	11
2009-10-25	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-1	52.0	840	969	20.07%	22.10%	57.83%	-1.12	+7.3	10
2009-10-25	UN Kaerjeng	D 1-1	54.8	1170	922	70.54%	17.15%	12.31%	+1.99	-1.9	20
2009-10-25	@ F91 Dudelange	D 1-1	54.8	922	1170	12.31%	17.15%	70.54%	-1.99	+1.9	7
2009-10-25	CS Petange	W 4-1	38.8	1014	965	47.67%	24.35%	27.98%	+0.53	+10.1	18
2009-10-25	@ Differdange 03	L 1-4	38.8	965	1014	27.98%	24.35%	47.67%	-0.53	-10.1	21
2009-10-30	Progres Niedercorn	W 2-0	39.2	924	947	37.69%	25.06%	37.26%	+0.01	+10.3	10
2009-10-30	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 0-2	39.2	947	924	37.26%	25.06%	37.69%	-0.01	-10.3	12
2009-10-31	Differdange 03	W 2-1	43.7	1073	1024	47.82%	24.33%	27.86%	+0.54	+4.1	25
2009-10-31	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-2	43.7	1024	1073	27.86%	24.33%	47.82%	-0.54	-4.1	18
2009-10-31	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 3-4	55.1	949	962	39.23%	25.04%	35.73%	+0.09	-5.0	16
2009-10-31	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 4-3	55.1	962	949	35.73%	25.04%	39.23%	-0.09	+5.0	14
2009-10-31	F91 Dudelange	W 1-0	44.4	1088	1168	30.17%	24.66%	45.17%	-0.40	+6.4	25
2009-10-31	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-1	44.4	1168	1088	45.17%	24.66%	30.17%	+0.40	-6.4	20
2009-10-31	RM Hamm Benfica	L 1-5	34.8	851	1009	21.88%	22.81%	55.32%	-0.97	-10.4	5
2009-10-31	@ Mondercange	W 5-1	34.8	1009	851	55.32%	22.81%	21.88%	+0.97	+10.4	17
2009-10-31	Fola Esch	L 1-3	44.4	955	977	37.90%	25.06%	37.04%	+0.02	-9.1	21
2009-10-31	@ CS Petange	W 3-1	44.4	977	955	37.04%	25.06%	37.90%	-0.02	+9.1	17
2009-10-31	Swift Hesperange	L 1-2	44.2	848	934	29.32%	24.55%	46.13%	-0.45	-4.3	10
2009-10-31	@ Rumelange	W 2-1	44.2	934	848	46.13%	24.55%	29.32%	+0.45	+4.3	16
2009-11-07	Grevenmacher	D 0-0	49.2	937	1095	21.83%	22.79%	55.38%	-0.97	+1.2	13
2009-11-07	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 0-0	49.2	1095	937	55.38%	22.79%	21.83%	+0.97	-1.2	26
2009-11-08	Fola Esch	W 3-0	34.7	1019	986	45.57%	24.61%	29.82%	+0.42	+12.6	20
2009-11-08	@ RM Hamm Benfica	L 0-3	34.7	986	1019	29.82%	24.61%	45.57%	-0.42	-12.6	17
2009-11-08	Rumelange	W 4-0	28.4	1020	844	63.18%	20.28%	16.53%	+1.47	+9.4	21
2009-11-08	@ Differdange 03	L 0-4	28.4	844	1020	16.53%	20.28%	63.18%	-1.47	-9.4	10
2009-11-08	UN Kaerjeng	D 1-1	52.6	967	934	45.63%	24.61%	29.76%	+0.42	-0.5	15
2009-11-08	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	52.6	934	967	29.76%	24.61%	45.63%	-0.42	+0.5	11
2009-11-08	CS Petange	D 0-0	49.4	1077	946	58.06%	22.03%	19.90%	+1.14	-1.3	26
2009-11-08	@ Jeunesse Esch	D 0-0	49.4	946	1077	19.90%	22.03%	58.06%	-1.14	+1.3	22
2009-11-22	F91 Dudelange	L 0-1	34.8	948	1162	17.36%	20.77%	61.87%	-1.38	-2.8	22
2009-11-22	@ CS Petange	W 1-0	34.8	1162	948	61.87%	20.77%	17.36%	+1.38	+2.8	23
2009-11-22	RM Hamm Benfica	D 2-2	57.7	938	1032	28.46%	24.42%	47.12%	-0.50	+0.4	14
2009-11-22	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 2-2	57.7	1032	938	47.12%	24.42%	28.46%	+0.50	-0.4	21
2009-11-22	Fola Esch	L 0-1	42.9	967	974	40.00%	25.02%	34.98%	+0.13	-5.8	15
2009-11-22	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 1-0	42.9	974	967	34.98%	25.02%	40.00%	-0.13	+5.8	20
2009-11-22	Grevenmacher	W 2-0	40.9	1029	1094	32.05%	24.85%	43.10%	-0.29	+11.6	24
2009-11-22	@ Differdange 03	L 0-2	40.9	1094	1029	43.10%	24.85%	32.05%	+0.29	-11.6	26
2009-11-22	Mondercange	W 2-1	41.8	939	840	54.11%	23.11%	22.78%	+0.90	+3.4	19
2009-11-22	@ Swift Hesperange	L 1-2	41.8	840	939	22.78%	23.11%	54.11%	-0.90	-3.4	5
2009-11-22	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	33.5	834	944	26.59%	24.09%	49.32%	-0.62	-11.4	10
2009-11-22	@ Rumelange	W 3-0	33.5	944	834	49.32%	24.09%	26.59%	+0.62	+11.4	19
2009-11-22	UN Kaerjeng	W 2-0	32.7	1076	934	59.30%	21.65%	19.05%	+1.21	+5.8	29
2009-11-22	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	32.7	934	1076	19.05%	21.65%	59.30%	-1.21	-5.8	11
2009-11-25	Mondercange	W 1-0	30.1	1164	837	77.53%	13.64%	8.83%	+2.57	+1.3	26
2009-11-25	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-1	30.1	837	1164	8.83%	13.64%	77.53%	-2.57	-1.3	5
2009-11-25	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-2	39.7	942	956	39.04%	25.04%	35.91%	+0.08	-10.7	19
2009-11-25	@ Swift Hesperange	W 2-0	39.7	956	942	35.91%	25.04%	39.04%	-0.08	+10.7	22
2009-11-29	Differdange 03	D 1-1	53.6	836	1041	18.01%	21.12%	60.86%	-1.31	+1.4	6
2009-11-29	@ Mondercange	D 1-1	53.6	1041	836	60.86%	21.12%	18.01%	+1.31	-1.4	25
2009-11-29	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 3-1	40.4	1031	961	50.59%	23.87%	25.54%	+0.70	+6.6	24
2009-11-29	@ RM Hamm Benfica	L 1-3	40.4	961	1031	25.54%	23.87%	50.59%	-0.70	-6.6	15
2009-11-29	Jeunesse Esch	L 2-5	46.0	1082	1082	41.08%	24.97%	33.95%	+0.18	-11.8	26
2009-11-29	@ Grevenmacher	W 5-2	46.0	1082	1082	33.95%	24.97%	41.08%	-0.18	+11.8	32
2009-11-29	Progres Niedercorn	W 2-1	37.5	1166	938	68.52%	18.07%	13.41%	+1.84	+2.0	29
2009-11-29	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-2	37.5	938	1166	13.41%	18.07%	68.52%	-1.84	-2.0	14
2009-11-29	Rumelange	L 1-2	51.4	929	823	55.06%	22.87%	22.06%	+0.95	-7.1	11
2009-11-29	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 2-1	51.4	823	929	22.06%	22.87%	55.06%	-0.95	+7.1	13
2009-11-29	Swift Hesperange	W 4-1	38.8	980	931	47.66%	24.35%	27.99%	+0.53	+10.1	23
2009-11-29	@ Fola Esch	L 1-4	38.8	931	980	27.99%	24.35%	47.66%	-0.53	-10.1	19
2009-11-29	CS Petange	W 3-1	42.3	967	945	44.07%	24.77%	31.17%	+0.34	+7.8	25
2009-11-29	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-3	42.3	945	967	31.17%	24.77%	44.07%	-0.34	-7.8	22
2009-12-05	Differdange 03	L 1-4	38.0	922	1039	25.79%	23.92%	50.29%	-0.68	-9.4	11
2009-12-05	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 4-1	38.0	1039	922	50.29%	23.92%	25.79%	+0.68	+9.4	28
2009-12-05	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	35.4	974	1093	25.66%	23.89%	50.45%	-0.69	-7.6	25
2009-12-05	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 2-0	35.4	1093	974	50.45%	23.89%	25.66%	+0.69	+7.6	35
2009-12-06	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-1	50.3	837	954	25.87%	23.94%	50.20%	-0.67	+6.5	9
2009-12-06	@ Mondercange	L 1-2	50.3	954	837	50.20%	23.94%	25.87%	+0.67	-6.5	15
2009-12-06	F91 Dudelange	W 4-2	52.2	1038	1168	24.54%	23.62%	51.84%	-0.77	+10.4	27
2009-12-06	@ RM Hamm Benfica	L 2-4	52.2	1168	1038	51.84%	23.62%	24.54%	+0.77	-10.4	29
2009-12-06	Progres Niedercorn	W 4-1	38.6	990	936	48.36%	24.25%	27.40%	+0.57	+9.9	26
2009-12-06	@ Fola Esch	L 1-4	38.6	936	990	27.40%	24.25%	48.36%	-0.57	-9.9	14
2009-12-06	Swift Hesperange	W 2-1	40.0	1070	921	60.16%	21.36%	18.48%	+1.27	+2.8	29
2009-12-06	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-2	40.0	921	1070	18.48%	21.36%	60.16%	-1.27	-2.8	19
2009-12-06	CS Petange	W 1-0	45.3	830	937	26.92%	24.16%	48.92%	-0.60	+6.8	16
2009-12-06	@ Rumelange	L 0-1	45.3	937	830	48.92%	24.16%	26.92%	+0.60	-6.8	22
2010-03-07	F91 Dudelange	L 1-2	39.7	948	1157	17.68%	20.94%	61.38%	-1.35	-2.7	15
2010-03-07	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-1	39.7	1157	948	61.38%	20.94%	17.68%	+1.35	+2.7	32
2010-03-07	RM Hamm Benfica	D 0-0	49.0	918	1048	24.55%	23.62%	51.82%	-0.77	+0.9	20
2010-03-07	@ Swift Hesperange	D 0-0	49.0	1048	918	51.82%	23.62%	24.55%	+0.77	-0.9	28
2010-03-07	Fola Esch	L 0-5	39.0	1049	999	47.80%	24.33%	27.87%	+0.54	-29.4	28
2010-03-07	@ Differdange 03	W 5-0	39.0	999	1049	27.87%	24.33%	47.80%	-0.54	+29.4	29
2010-03-07	Grevenmacher	L 0-2	31.2	837	1073	15.83%	19.84%	64.33%	-1.54	-4.7	16
2010-03-07	@ Rumelange	W 2-0	31.2	1073	837	64.33%	19.84%	15.83%	+1.54	+4.7	32
2010-03-07	Mondercange	W 2-0	29.1	1101	844	71.42%	16.73%	11.85%	+2.06	+3.4	38
2010-03-07	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	29.1	844	1101	11.85%	16.73%	71.42%	-2.06	-3.4	9
2010-03-07	Progres Niedercorn	D 1-1	52.5	930	926	41.59%	24.95%	33.47%	+0.21	-0.2	23
2010-03-07	@ CS Petange	D 1-1	52.5	926	930	33.47%	24.95%	41.59%	-0.21	+0.2	15
2010-03-07	UN Kaerjeng	W 1-0	38.8	967	912	48.53%	24.22%	27.25%	+0.58	+4.3	28
2010-03-07	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	38.8	912	967	27.25%	24.22%	48.53%	-0.58	-4.3	11
2010-03-12	CS Petange	D 0-0	48.5	908	930	37.85%	25.06%	37.09%	+0.02	-0.0	12
2010-03-12	@ UN Kaerjeng	D 0-0	48.5	930	908	37.09%	25.06%	37.85%	-0.02	+0.0	24
2010-03-13	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.1	1078	971	55.16%	22.85%	21.99%	+0.96	-1.0	33
2010-03-13	@ Grevenmacher	D 1-1	53.1	971	1078	21.99%	22.85%	55.16%	-0.96	+1.0	29
2010-03-14	Differdange 03	W 3-0	34.9	1047	1019	44.91%	24.69%	30.40%	+0.38	+12.8	31
2010-03-14	@ RM Hamm Benfica	L 0-3	34.9	1019	1047	30.40%	24.69%	44.91%	-0.38	-12.8	28
2010-03-14	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-3	44.6	927	945	38.39%	25.05%	36.56%	+0.05	-9.2	15
2010-03-14	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 3-1	44.6	945	927	36.56%	25.05%	38.39%	-0.05	+9.2	18
2010-03-14	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	40.0	1029	1105	30.64%	24.71%	44.64%	-0.37	-4.7	29
2010-03-14	@ Fola Esch	W 1-0	40.0	1105	1029	44.64%	24.71%	30.64%	+0.37	+4.7	41
2010-03-14	Rumelange	L 0-2	40.6	840	832	42.21%	24.91%	32.88%	+0.24	-11.4	9
2010-03-14	@ Mondercange	W 2-0	40.6	832	840	32.88%	24.91%	42.21%	-0.24	+11.4	19
2010-03-14	Swift Hesperange	W 4-1	32.2	1160	919	69.80%	17.49%	12.71%	+1.94	+4.5	35
2010-03-14	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-4	32.2	919	1160	12.71%	17.49%	69.80%	-1.94	-4.5	20
2010-03-21	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	52.4	930	954	37.59%	25.06%	37.35%	+0.01	-0.0	25
2010-03-21	@ CS Petange	D 1-1	52.4	954	930	37.35%	25.06%	37.59%	-0.01	+0.0	19
2010-03-21	F91 Dudelange	L 0-1	36.8	1007	1164	21.86%	22.80%	55.34%	-0.97	-3.5	28
2010-03-21	@ Differdange 03	W 1-0	36.8	1164	1007	55.34%	22.80%	21.86%	+0.97	+3.5	38
2010-03-21	RM Hamm Benfica	W 1-0	39.1	1109	1060	47.80%	24.33%	27.87%	+0.54	+4.3	44
2010-03-21	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	39.1	1060	1109	27.87%	24.33%	47.80%	-0.54	-4.3	31
2010-03-21	Fola Esch	L 2-4	42.1	843	1024	19.87%	22.02%	58.11%	-1.14	-4.6	19
2010-03-21	@ Rumelange	W 4-2	42.1	1024	843	58.11%	22.02%	19.87%	+1.14	+4.6	32
2010-03-21	Grevenmacher	D 1-1	53.2	908	1077	20.89%	22.44%	56.67%	-1.05	+1.1	13
2010-03-21	@ UN Kaerjeng	D 1-1	53.2	1077	908	56.67%	22.44%	20.89%	+1.05	-1.1	34
2010-03-21	Mondercange	W 1-0	35.5	972	829	59.50%	21.58%	18.92%	+1.23	+3.0	32
2010-03-21	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	35.5	829	972	18.92%	21.58%	59.50%	-1.23	-3.0	9
2010-03-21	Progres Niedercorn	L 1-4	42.8	915	917	40.66%	24.99%	34.34%	+0.16	-13.5	20
2010-03-21	@ Swift Hesperange	W 4-1	42.8	917	915	34.34%	24.99%	40.66%	-0.16	+13.5	18
2010-03-27	Differdange 03	D 0-0	48.6	931	1003	31.08%	24.76%	44.16%	-0.35	+0.4	19
2010-03-27	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 0-0	48.6	1003	931	44.16%	24.76%	31.08%	+0.35	-0.4	29
2010-03-27	CS Petange	L 0-3	42.7	1076	930	59.76%	21.49%	18.74%	+1.24	-21.9	34
2010-03-27	@ Grevenmacher	W 3-0	42.7	930	1076	18.74%	21.49%	59.76%	-1.24	+21.9	28
2010-03-28	Jeunesse Esch	W 4-0	32.9	1168	1114	48.48%	24.23%	27.29%	+0.58	+15.3	41
2010-03-28	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-4	32.9	1114	1168	27.29%	24.23%	48.48%	-0.58	-15.3	44
2010-03-28	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-2	49.9	1029	975	48.39%	24.24%	27.37%	+0.57	-6.3	32
2010-03-28	@ Fola Esch	W 2-1	49.9	975	1029	27.37%	24.24%	48.39%	-0.57	+6.3	35
2010-03-28	Rumelange	L 0-3	44.1	1056	838	67.49%	18.53%	13.98%	+1.77	-24.2	31
2010-03-28	@ RM Hamm Benfica	W 3-0	44.1	838	1056	13.98%	18.53%	67.49%	-1.77	+24.2	22
2010-03-28	Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	38.9	954	901	48.28%	24.26%	27.46%	+0.57	+4.3	22
2010-03-28	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-1	38.9	901	954	27.46%	24.26%	48.28%	-0.57	-4.3	20
2010-03-28	UN Kaerjeng	L 0-4	33.7	826	909	29.73%	24.60%	45.67%	-0.43	-16.4	9
2010-03-28	@ Mondercange	W 4-0	33.7	909	826	45.67%	24.60%	29.73%	+0.43	+16.4	16
2010-04-11	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-0	36.4	1003	958	47.12%	24.42%	28.45%	+0.50	+8.3	32
2010-04-11	@ Differdange 03	L 0-2	36.4	958	1003	28.45%	24.42%	47.12%	-0.50	-8.4	22
2010-04-11	F91 Dudelange	L 0-5	25.6	863	1183	11.21%	16.13%	72.66%	-2.16	-7.5	22
2010-04-11	@ Rumelange	W 5-0	25.6	1183	863	72.66%	16.13%	11.21%	+2.16	+7.5	44
2010-04-11	RM Hamm Benfica	W 1-0	43.2	981	1032	33.96%	24.97%	41.07%	-0.18	+5.9	38
2010-04-11	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	43.2	1032	981	41.07%	24.97%	33.96%	+0.18	-5.9	31
2010-04-11	Fola Esch	W 1-0	44.9	925	1022	28.08%	24.36%	47.55%	-0.53	+6.6	19
2010-04-11	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 0-1	44.9	1022	925	47.55%	24.36%	28.08%	+0.53	-6.6	32
2010-04-11	Mondercange	L 0-1	49.6	1054	809	70.17%	17.32%	12.51%	+1.96	-9.1	34
2010-04-11	@ Grevenmacher	W 1-0	49.6	809	1054	12.51%	17.32%	70.17%	-1.96	+9.1	12
2010-04-11	Progres Niedercorn	W 2-1	39.4	1098	931	62.17%	20.66%	17.17%	+1.40	+2.6	47
2010-04-11	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-2	39.4	931	1098	17.17%	20.66%	62.17%	-1.40	-2.6	19
2010-04-11	Swift Hesperange	L 1-3	47.4	952	897	48.57%	24.21%	27.22%	+0.58	-11.0	28
2010-04-11	@ CS Petange	W 3-1	47.4	897	952	27.22%	24.21%	48.57%	-0.58	+11.0	23
2010-04-15	CS Petange	L 0-1	38.1	818	941	25.29%	23.81%	50.90%	-0.71	-4.0	12
2010-04-15	@ Mondercange	W 1-0	38.1	941	818	50.90%	23.81%	25.29%	+0.71	+4.0	31
2010-04-18	Differdange 03	W 3-0	40.1	908	1011	27.42%	24.25%	48.33%	-0.57	+18.4	26
2010-04-18	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-3	40.1	1011	908	48.33%	24.25%	27.42%	+0.57	-18.4	32
2010-04-18	Grevenmacher	W 3-2	51.8	1016	1045	36.90%	25.06%	38.04%	-0.03	+5.0	35
2010-04-18	@ Fola Esch	L 2-3	51.8	1045	1016	38.04%	25.06%	36.90%	+0.03	-5.0	34
2010-04-18	Jeunesse Esch	D 1-1	53.1	950	1101	22.51%	23.02%	54.47%	-0.92	+1.0	23
2010-04-18	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	53.1	1101	950	54.47%	23.02%	22.51%	+0.92	-1.0	48
2010-04-18	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 3-0	28.6	1191	987	66.07%	19.13%	14.80%	+1.66	+6.4	47
2010-04-18	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-3	28.6	987	1191	14.80%	19.13%	66.07%	-1.66	-6.4	38
2010-04-18	Rumelange	W 3-1	40.2	929	855	51.00%	23.79%	25.21%	+0.72	+6.5	22
2010-04-18	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 1-3	40.2	855	929	25.21%	23.79%	51.00%	-0.72	-6.5	22
2010-04-18	UN Kaerjeng	W 3-0	32.3	1026	932	53.54%	23.25%	23.21%	+0.86	+10.1	34
2010-04-18	@ RM Hamm Benfica	L 0-3	32.3	932	1026	23.21%	23.25%	53.54%	-0.86	-10.1	19
2010-04-23	Fola Esch	D 2-2	58.7	814	1021	17.91%	21.07%	61.02%	-1.32	+1.0	13
2010-04-23	@ Mondercange	D 2-2	58.7	1021	814	61.02%	21.07%	17.91%	+1.32	-1.0	36
2010-04-25	Differdange 03	D 0-0	48.6	945	993	34.30%	24.99%	40.71%	-0.17	+0.2	32
2010-04-25	@ CS Petange	D 0-0	48.6	993	945	40.71%	24.99%	34.30%	+0.17	-0.2	33
2010-04-25	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-3	41.0	849	951	27.47%	24.26%	48.27%	-0.57	-7.0	22
2010-04-25	@ Rumelange	W 3-1	41.0	951	849	48.27%	24.26%	27.47%	+0.57	+7.0	26
2010-04-25	F91 Dudelange	W 1-0	49.3	922	1197	13.52%	18.16%	68.32%	-1.83	+8.9	22
2010-04-25	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 0-1	49.3	1197	922	68.32%	18.16%	13.52%	+1.83	-8.9	47
2010-04-25	RM Hamm Benfica	W 3-2	50.4	1040	1036	41.57%	24.95%	33.48%	+0.21	+4.5	37
2010-04-25	@ Grevenmacher	L 2-3	50.4	1036	1040	33.48%	24.95%	41.57%	-0.21	-4.5	34
2010-04-25	Progres Niedercorn	L 1-2	49.6	981	935	47.33%	24.39%	28.27%	+0.52	-6.2	38
2010-04-25	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 2-1	49.6	935	981	28.27%	24.39%	47.33%	-0.52	+6.2	25
2010-04-25	Swift Hesperange	W 3-1	36.7	1100	926	62.88%	20.40%	16.72%	+1.45	+4.3	51
2010-04-25	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-3	36.7	926	1100	16.72%	20.40%	62.88%	-1.45	-4.4	26
2010-05-09	Grevenmacher	W 5-0	29.5	1188	1044	59.58%	21.55%	18.86%	+1.23	+13.3	50
2010-05-09	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-5	29.5	1044	1188	18.86%	21.55%	59.58%	-1.23	-13.3	37
2010-05-09	Jeunesse Esch	W 5-2	48.2	992	1104	26.42%	24.06%	49.52%	-0.64	+13.7	36
2010-05-09	@ Differdange 03	L 2-5	48.2	1104	992	49.52%	24.06%	26.42%	+0.64	-13.7	51
2010-05-09	Mondercange	W 2-0	30.3	1031	815	67.34%	18.59%	14.07%	+1.76	+4.2	37
2010-05-09	@ RM Hamm Benfica	L 0-2	30.3	815	1031	14.07%	18.59%	67.34%	-1.76	-4.2	13
2010-05-09	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 6-1	38.8	958	975	38.65%	25.05%	36.30%	+0.06	+19.6	29
2010-05-09	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-6	38.8	975	958	36.30%	25.05%	38.65%	-0.06	-19.6	38
2010-05-09	Rumelange	W 4-1	37.5	922	842	51.88%	23.61%	24.51%	+0.77	+9.0	29
2010-05-09	@ Swift Hesperange	L 1-4	37.5	842	922	24.51%	23.61%	51.88%	-0.77	-9.0	22
2010-05-09	UN Kaerjeng	L 0-2	40.7	941	931	42.52%	24.89%	32.59%	+0.26	-11.4	25
2010-05-09	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 2-0	40.7	931	941	32.59%	24.89%	42.52%	-0.26	+11.4	25
2010-05-09	CS Petange	W 2-1	42.7	1020	945	51.13%	23.76%	25.11%	+0.73	+3.7	39
2010-05-09	@ Fola Esch	L 1-2	42.7	945	1020	25.11%	23.76%	51.13%	-0.73	-3.8	32
2010-05-16	Differdange 03	L 1-2	40.9	833	1006	20.51%	22.29%	57.21%	-1.08	-3.1	22
2010-05-16	@ Rumelange	W 2-1	40.9	1006	833	57.21%	22.29%	20.51%	+1.08	+3.1	39
2010-05-16	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-1	41.7	942	978	35.96%	25.04%	39.00%	-0.08	-5.3	25
2010-05-16	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 1-0	41.7	978	942	39.00%	25.04%	35.96%	+0.08	+5.3	32
2010-05-16	F91 Dudelange	L 0-9	25.7	811	1202	8.34%	13.09%	78.57%	-2.67	-9.2	13
2010-05-16	@ Mondercange	W 9-0	25.7	1202	811	78.57%	13.09%	8.34%	+2.67	+9.2	53
2010-05-16	RM Hamm Benfica	D 1-1	52.5	1024	1035	39.33%	25.04%	35.63%	+0.09	-0.1	40
2010-05-16	@ Fola Esch	D 1-1	52.5	1035	1024	35.63%	25.04%	39.33%	-0.09	+0.1	38
2010-05-16	Progres Niedercorn	W 2-1	41.7	1031	930	54.44%	23.03%	22.53%	+0.92	+3.4	40
2010-05-16	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-2	41.7	930	1031	22.53%	23.03%	54.44%	-0.92	-3.4	25
2010-05-16	Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	40.1	955	931	44.38%	24.74%	30.88%	+0.36	+4.7	41
2010-05-16	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	40.1	931	955	30.88%	24.74%	44.38%	-0.36	-4.7	29
2010-05-17	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-3	32.1	941	1091	22.67%	23.08%	54.26%	-0.91	-9.9	32
2010-05-17	@ CS Petange	W 3-0	32.1	1091	941	54.26%	23.08%	22.67%	+0.91	+9.9	54
2010-05-21	Fola Esch	D 3-3	63.1	1211	1023	64.38%	19.82%	15.80%	+1.55	-1.0	54
2010-05-21	@ F91 Dudelange	D 3-3	63.1	1023	1211	15.80%	19.82%	64.38%	-1.55	+1.0	41
2010-05-21	Grevenmacher	L 1-3	43.2	983	1034	33.81%	24.97%	41.23%	-0.19	-8.3	32
2010-05-21	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 3-1	43.2	1034	983	41.23%	24.97%	33.81%	+0.19	+8.3	43
2010-05-21	Mondercange	W 4-2	42.3	927	802	57.31%	22.26%	20.43%	+1.09	+4.8	28
2010-05-21	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 2-4	42.3	802	927	20.43%	22.26%	57.31%	-1.09	-4.8	13
2010-05-21	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 7-0	34.1	1009	960	47.81%	24.33%	27.86%	+0.54	+26.4	42
2010-05-21	@ Differdange 03	L 0-7	34.1	960	1009	27.86%	24.33%	47.81%	-0.54	-26.4	41
2010-05-21	Rumelange	W 4-0	25.6	1100	830	72.66%	16.13%	11.21%	+2.16	+6.1	57
2010-05-21	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-4	25.6	830	1100	11.21%	16.13%	72.66%	-2.16	-6.1	22
2010-05-21	UN Kaerjeng	L 1-4	42.5	926	937	39.52%	25.03%	35.45%	+0.10	-13.2	29
2010-05-21	@ Swift Hesperange	W 4-1	42.5	937	926	35.45%	25.03%	39.52%	-0.10	+13.2	28
2010-05-21	CS Petange	W 7-2	35.4	1036	932	54.82%	22.93%	22.24%	+0.94	+10.9	41
2010-05-21	@ RM Hamm Benfica	L 2-7	35.4	932	1036	22.24%	22.93%	54.82%	-0.94	-10.9	32

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	2010-04-11	12.51%	Mondercange	809	1	@ Grevenmacher	1054	0
2	2010-04-25	13.52%	@ UN Kaerjeng	922	1	F91 Dudelange	1197	0
3	2010-03-28	13.98%	Rumelange	838	3	@ RM Hamm Benfica	1056	0
4	2009-08-22	16.37%	@ Progres Niedercorn	950	4	F91 Dudelange	1178	2
5	2010-03-27	18.74%	CS Petange	930	3	@ Grevenmacher	1076	0
6	2009-10-25	20.07%	Rumelange	840	2	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	969	1
7	2009-10-18	20.89%	Etzella Ettelbruck	962	2	@ Jeunesse Esch	1081	1
8	2009-11-29	22.06%	Rumelange	823	2	@ UN Kaerjeng	929	1
9	2009-09-27	22.34%	@ CS Petange	935	2	Grevenmacher	1087	0
10	2009-09-13	22.35%	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	936	2	Grevenmacher	1089	1
11	2009-12-06	24.54%	@ RM Hamm Benfica	1038	4	F91 Dudelange	1168	2
12	2009-12-06	25.87%	@ Mondercange	837	2	Etzella Ettelbruck	954	1
13	2010-05-09	26.42%	@ Differdange 03	992	5	Jeunesse Esch	1104	2
14	2009-12-06	26.92%	@ Rumelange	830	1	CS Petange	937	0
15	2010-04-11	27.22%	Swift Hesperange	897	3	@ CS Petange	952	1
16	2010-03-28	27.37%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	975	2	@ Fola Esch	1029	1
17	2010-04-18	27.42%	@ Swift Hesperange	908	3	Differdange 03	1011	0
18	2009-08-29	27.51%	CS Petange	910	1	@ Progres Niedercorn	962	0
19	2010-03-07	27.87%	Fola Esch	999	5	@ Differdange 03	1049	0
20	2010-04-11	28.08%	@ UN Kaerjeng	925	1	Fola Esch	1022	0
21	2010-04-25	28.27%	Progres Niedercorn	935	2	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	981	1
22	2009-08-02	28.66%	Swift Hesperange	920	2	@ UN Kaerjeng	963	0
23	2009-09-20	28.91%	CS Petange	925	4	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	966	2
24	2009-08-08	30.10%	Rumelange	879	3	@ CS Petange	910	1
25	2009-10-31	30.17%	@ Grevenmacher	1088	1	F91 Dudelange	1168	0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2010-03-07	29.38	Fola Esch	5	999	27.87%	@ Differdange 03	0	1049	47.80%	24.33%
2	2010-05-21	26.36	@ Differdange 03	7	1009	47.81%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	0	960	27.86%	24.33%
3	2010-03-28	24.16	Rumelange	3	838	13.98%	@ RM Hamm Benfica	0	1056	67.49%	18.53%
4	2009-09-27	21.93	RM Hamm Benfica	6	982	49.22%	@ Rumelange	0	873	26.67%	24.11%
5	2010-03-27	21.93	CS Petange	3	930	18.74%	@ Grevenmacher	0	1076	59.76%	21.49%
6	2010-05-09	19.62	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	6	958	38.65%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1	975	36.30%	25.05%
7	2010-04-18	18.40	@ Swift Hesperange	3	908	27.42%	Differdange 03	0	1011	48.33%	24.25%
8	2010-03-28	16.43	UN Kaerjeng	4	909	45.67%	@ Mondercange	0	826	29.73%	24.60%
9	2010-03-28	15.29	@ F91 Dudelange	4	1168	48.48%	Jeunesse Esch	0	1114	27.29%	24.23%
10	2009-09-20	14.64	Swift Hesperange	4	927	30.38%	@ Progres Niedercorn	1	955	44.94%	24.68%
11	2009-09-27	14.04	@ CS Petange	2	935	22.34%	Grevenmacher	0	1087	54.70%	22.97%
12	2010-05-09	13.71	@ Differdange 03	5	992	26.42%	Jeunesse Esch	2	1104	49.52%	24.06%
13	2010-03-21	13.53	Progres Niedercorn	4	917	34.34%	@ Swift Hesperange	1	915	40.66%	24.99%
14	2009-08-23	13.37	@ CS Petange	4	896	34.93%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1	939	40.06%	25.01%
15	2010-05-09	13.33	@ F91 Dudelange	5	1188	59.58%	Grevenmacher	0	1044	18.86%	21.55%
16	2010-05-21	13.24	UN Kaerjeng	4	937	35.45%	@ Swift Hesperange	1	926	39.52%	25.03%
17	2010-03-14	12.81	@ RM Hamm Benfica	3	1047	44.91%	Differdange 03	0	1019	30.40%	24.69%
18	2009-10-18	12.65	Progres Niedercorn	3	934	45.42%	@ Rumelange	0	853	29.95%	24.63%
19	2009-11-08	12.61	@ RM Hamm Benfica	3	1019	45.57%	Fola Esch	0	986	29.82%	24.61%
20	2009-08-16	12.43	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3	927	46.14%	Rumelange	0	890	29.31%	24.55%
21	2009-08-02	12.37	Swift Hesperange	2	920	28.66%	@ UN Kaerjeng	0	963	46.89%	24.45%
22	2009-08-22	12.28	@ Progres Niedercorn	4	950	16.37%	F91 Dudelange	2	1178	63.45%	20.18%
23	2009-11-29	11.81	Jeunesse Esch	5	1082	33.95%	@ Grevenmacher	2	1082	41.08%	24.97%
24	2009-11-22	11.56	@ Differdange 03	2	1029	32.05%	Grevenmacher	0	1094	43.10%	24.85%
25	2009-11-22	11.44	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3	944	49.32%	@ Rumelange	0	834	26.59%	24.09%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2010-05-21	63.1	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1211	64.38%	Fola Esch	3	1023	15.80%	19.82%
2	2009-08-16	61.7	@ RM Hamm Benfica	3	993	47.01%	Progres Niedercorn	3	949	28.55%	24.44%
3	2009-10-18	58.9	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2	948	16.75%	F91 Dudelange	2	1171	62.83%	20.42%
4	2010-04-23	58.7	@ Mondercange	2	814	17.91%	Fola Esch	2	1021	61.02%	21.07%
5	2009-11-22	57.7	@ Progres Niedercorn	2	938	28.46%	RM Hamm Benfica	2	1032	47.12%	24.42%
6	2009-10-25	57.6	@ RM Hamm Benfica	2	1008	30.04%	Grevenmacher	2	1089	45.31%	24.64%
7	2009-09-13	57.5	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	2	966	42.49%	Progres Niedercorn	2	955	32.62%	24.89%
8	2009-09-27	57.5	@ Swift Hesperange	2	942	39.03%	Etzella Ettelbruck	2	956	35.93%	25.04%
9	2009-09-27	57.5	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2	948	35.52%	Fola Esch	2	986	39.45%	25.03%
10	2009-10-25	57.5	@ Progres Niedercorn	2	947	40.70%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2	949	34.31%	24.99%
11	2009-10-31	55.1	Etzella Ettelbruck	4	962	35.73%	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3	949	39.23%	25.04%
12	2009-10-25	54.8	@ F91 Dudelange	1	1170	70.54%	UN Kaerjeng	1	922	12.31%	17.15%
13	2009-08-16	54.7	@ Fola Esch	5	975	41.99%	Etzella Ettelbruck	4	968	33.09%	24.92%
14	2009-08-22	54.6	@ Progres Niedercorn	4	950	16.37%	F91 Dudelange	2	1178	63.45%	20.18%
15	2009-08-30	54.2	@ F91 Dudelange	1	1166	65.90%	Etzella Ettelbruck	1	964	14.90%	19.20%
16	2009-11-29	53.6	@ Mondercange	1	836	18.01%	Differdange 03	1	1041	60.86%	21.12%
17	2009-08-30	53.4	@ Mondercange	1	878	19.28%	Jeunesse Esch	1	1066	58.97%	21.75%
18	2009-10-25	53.3	@ Fola Esch	1	978	57.81%	Mondercange	1	850	20.08%	22.11%
19	2010-03-21	53.2	@ UN Kaerjeng	1	908	20.89%	Grevenmacher	1	1077	56.67%	22.44%
20	2010-03-13	53.1	@ Grevenmacher	1	1078	55.16%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1	971	21.99%	22.85%
21	2010-04-18	53.1	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1	950	22.51%	Jeunesse Esch	1	1101	54.47%	23.02%
22	2009-09-27	52.9	@ Differdange 03	1	1022	51.91%	Progres Niedercorn	1	941	24.48%	23.60%
23	2009-10-18	52.9	@ Differdange 03	1	1015	52.09%	Swift Hesperange	1	932	24.34%	23.57%
24	2009-09-27	52.7	@ Jeunesse Esch	1	1074	27.70%	F91 Dudelange	1	1174	48.00%	24.30%
25	2009-09-27	52.7	@ UN Kaerjeng	1	926	49.45%	Mondercange	1	865	26.48%	24.07%

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2010-04-11	25.6	F91 Dudelange	5	1183	72.66%	@ Rumelange	0	863	11.21%	16.13%
2	2010-05-21	25.6	@ Jeunesse Esch	4	1100	72.66%	Rumelange	0	830	11.21%	16.13%
3	2010-05-16	25.7	F91 Dudelange	9	1202	78.57%	@ Mondercange	0	811	8.34%	13.09%
4	2009-11-08	28.4	@ Differdange 03	4	1020	63.18%	Rumelange	0	844	16.53%	20.28%
5	2009-08-16	28.6	@ F91 Dudelange	2	1175	73.09%	CS Petange	0	899	10.99%	15.92%
6	2010-04-18	28.6	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1191	66.07%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	0	987	14.80%	19.13%
7	2010-03-07	29.1	@ Jeunesse Esch	2	1101	71.42%	Mondercange	0	844	11.85%	16.73%
8	2010-05-09	29.5	@ F91 Dudelange	5	1188	59.58%	Grevenmacher	0	1044	18.86%	21.55%
9	2009-08-08	29.7	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1167	62.21%	RM Hamm Benfica	0	1000	17.15%	20.65%
10	2009-11-25	30.1	@ F91 Dudelange	1	1164	77.53%	Mondercange	0	837	8.83%	13.64%
11	2010-05-09	30.3	@ RM Hamm Benfica	2	1031	67.34%	Mondercange	0	815	14.07%	18.59%
12	2010-03-07	31.2	Grevenmacher	2	1073	64.33%	@ Rumelange	0	837	15.83%	19.84%
13	2009-09-13	31.4	F91 Dudelange	2	1164	63.84%	@ Swift Hesperange	0	932	16.13%	20.03%
14	2010-05-17	32.1	Jeunesse Esch	3	1091	54.26%	@ CS Petange	0	941	22.67%	23.08%
15	2010-03-14	32.2	@ F91 Dudelange	4	1160	69.80%	Swift Hesperange	1	919	12.71%	17.49%
16	2010-04-18	32.3	@ RM Hamm Benfica	3	1026	53.54%	UN Kaerjeng	0	932	23.21%	23.25%
17	2009-11-22	32.7	@ Jeunesse Esch	2	1076	59.30%	UN Kaerjeng	0	934	19.05%	21.65%
18	2010-03-28	32.9	@ F91 Dudelange	4	1168	48.48%	Jeunesse Esch	0	1114	27.29%	24.23%
19	2009-10-04	33.0	Grevenmacher	5	1073	61.21%	@ Mondercange	1	865	17.78%	21.00%
20	2009-08-30	33.1	@ Grevenmacher	4	1083	66.78%	Rumelange	1	873	14.38%	18.83%
21	2009-09-27	33.1	RM Hamm Benfica	6	982	49.22%	@ Rumelange	0	873	26.67%	24.11%
22	2009-11-22	33.5	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3	944	49.32%	@ Rumelange	0	834	26.59%	24.09%
23	2010-03-28	33.7	UN Kaerjeng	4	909	45.67%	@ Mondercange	0	826	29.73%	24.60%
24	2010-05-21	34.1	@ Differdange 03	7	1009	47.81%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	0	960	27.86%	24.33%
25	2009-10-18	34.3	@ Grevenmacher	2	1082	53.91%	Fola Esch	0	985	22.93%	23.16%