‹ ›

1995 Armenian Premier League Season

60 games

Final

Champion

No Champion

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Shirak

9.83 points above expected

24 points · 14.17 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Yerazank

3.55 points below expected

5 points · 8.55 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Shirak 10 7 3 0 24 23 6 +17 14.17 +9.83
2 Araks Ararat 10 5 1 4 16 19 12 +7 10.81 +5.19
3 Aznavour 10 4 1 5 13 10 14 -4 8.00 +5.00
4 Homenmen-FIMA FC 10 3 3 4 12 11 13 -2 11.06 +0.94
5 Zangezour 10 3 3 4 12 13 22 -9 7.41 +4.59
6 Yerazank 10 0 5 5 5 4 13 -9 8.55 -3.55
# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Ararat 10 6 2 2 20 34 11 +23 13.46 +6.54
2 Homenetmen Yerevan 10 5 4 1 19 30 7 +23 14.39 +4.61
3 Kotayk 10 4 3 3 15 17 12 +5 9.02 +5.98
4 Van Yerevan 10 4 1 5 13 15 21 -6 5.88 +7.12
5 Aragats 10 2 3 5 9 14 31 -17 8.59 +0.41
6 Banants Kotayk 10 2 1 7 7 15 43 -28 8.66 -1.66

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Shirak 24 14.17 +9.83
2 Van Yerevan 13 5.88 +7.12
3 Ararat 20 13.46 +6.54
4 Kotayk 15 9.02 +5.98
5 Araks Ararat 16 10.81 +5.19

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Yerazank 5 8.55 -3.55
2 Banants Kotayk 7 8.66 -1.66
3 Aragats 9 8.59 +0.41
4 Homenmen-FIMA FC 12 11.06 +0.94
5 Zangezour 12 7.41 +4.59

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Shirak 1294 24 +41 13 10.7 +2.3
Ararat 1326 20 +49 12 10.6 +1.4
Homenetmen Yerevan 1333 19 -5 8 10.8 -2.8
Araks Ararat 1121 16 +33 9 8.7 +0.3
Kotayk 1111 15 -10 7 5.5 +1.5
Van Yerevan 1060 13 +130 10 4.5 +5.5
Aznavour 993 13 +11 6 4.7 +1.3
Homenmen-FIMA FC 1091 12 +15 10 8.4 +1.6
Zangezour 934 12 -40 2 4.2 -2.2
Aragats 1033 9 -26 5 5.7 -0.7
Banants Kotayk 931 7 -174 1 5.3 -4.3
Yerazank 938 5 -18 2 3.9 -1.9

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Group A

Team AA AZN HOM SHI YER ZAN
Araks Ararat —
1-0-1
3.58
1-1-0
2.53
0-0-2
1.76
2-0-0
3.49
1-0-1
3.63
Aznavour
1-0-1
1.90
—
1-0-1
1.98
0-0-2
1.17
1-1-0
2.48
1-0-1
3.02
Homenmen-FIMA FC
0-1-1
2.94
1-0-1
3.50
—
0-1-1
1.64
1-1-0
3.70
1-0-1
3.87
Shirak
2-0-0
3.73
2-0-0
4.34
1-1-0
3.85
—
1-1-0
4.38
1-1-0
4.42
Yerazank
0-0-2
2.00
0-1-1
2.99
0-1-1
1.78
0-1-1
1.13
—
0-2-0
2.95
Zangezour
1-0-1
1.85
1-0-1
2.45
1-0-1
1.61
0-1-1
1.10
0-2-0
2.53
—

Group B

Team ARA ARA BK HY KOT VY
Aragats —
0-0-2
1.42
1-1-0
2.78
0-0-2
1.32
0-2-0
2.47
1-0-1
3.58
Ararat
2-0-0
4.08
—
1-0-1
4.24
0-2-0
2.31
1-0-1
3.99
2-0-0
4.35
Banants Kotayk
0-1-1
2.70
1-0-1
1.27
—
0-0-2
1.87
1-0-1
2.29
0-0-2
3.13
Homenetmen Yerevan
2-0-0
4.18
0-2-0
3.16
2-0-0
3.62
—
0-1-1
4.19
1-1-0
4.67
Kotayk
0-2-0
3.00
1-0-1
1.50
1-0-1
3.19
1-1-0
1.32
—
1-0-1
3.37
Van Yerevan
1-0-1
1.90
0-0-2
1.16
2-0-0
2.34
0-1-1
0.87
1-0-1
2.11
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.64 +5.2
Allowed 0.44 -3.4
Differential 0.78 +3.1

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
011.67%5.83%4.17%3.33%1.67%5.00%31.67%
15.83%10.00%5.00%1.67%0.83%3.33%26.67%
24.17%5.00%1.67%4.17%0.83%—15.83%
33.33%1.67%4.17%1.67%0.83%—11.67%
41.67%0.83%0.83%0.83%—0.83%5.00%
5+5.00%3.33%——0.83%—9.17%
Total31.67%26.67%15.83%11.67%5.00%9.17%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.71 1.71 +0.00
SD 1.92 1.92 2.95
CV 1.12 1.12 —
Max 10 10 +10
Min 0 0 -10

Games Played: 60

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
020.00%——10.00%—20.00%50.00%
1——10.00%———10.00%
2——10.00%10.00%——20.00%
3———————
4——10.00%———10.00%
5+————10.00%—10.00%
Total20.00%—30.00%20.00%10.00%20.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.40 3.10 -1.70
SD 1.84 2.88 3.53
CV 1.31 0.93 —
Max 5 10 +2
Min 0 0 -10

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%10.00%10.00%———30.00%
110.00%—————10.00%
2———20.00%——20.00%
320.00%—10.00%———30.00%
4———————
5+—10.00%————10.00%
Total40.00%20.00%20.00%20.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.90 1.20 +0.70
SD 1.66 1.23 2.06
CV 0.88 1.02 —
Max 5 3 +4
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
110.00%20.00%————30.00%
2———10.00%——10.00%
3——10.00%—10.00%—20.00%
410.00%—————10.00%
5+30.00%—————30.00%
Total50.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.40 1.10 +2.30
SD 2.37 1.45 3.20
CV 0.70 1.32 —
Max 8 4 +8
Min 1 0 -1

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%——40.00%
110.00%—10.00%10.00%——30.00%
210.00%10.00%————20.00%
3——10.00%———10.00%
4———————
5+———————
Total30.00%20.00%30.00%20.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.00 1.40 -0.40
SD 1.05 1.17 1.65
CV 1.05 0.84 —
Max 3 3 +2
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——10.00%——20.00%30.00%
1————10.00%20.00%30.00%
2—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
3———————
4———10.00%—10.00%20.00%
5+———————
Total—10.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%50.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 4.30 -2.80
SD 1.51 2.31 3.16
CV 1.01 0.54 —
Max 4 8 +1
Min 0 1 -8

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%—————10.00%
110.00%30.00%10.00%———50.00%
2———————
310.00%—————10.00%
4———————
5+10.00%20.00%————30.00%
Total40.00%50.00%10.00%———100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.00 0.70 +2.30
SD 3.30 0.67 3.50
CV 1.10 0.96 —
Max 10 2 +10
Min 0 0 -1

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
020.00%20.00%——10.00%—50.00%
110.00%——10.00%——20.00%
2———————
310.00%10.00%—10.00%——30.00%
4———————
5+———————
Total40.00%30.00%—20.00%10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.10 1.30 -0.20
SD 1.37 1.49 1.99
CV 1.25 1.15 —
Max 3 4 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
030.00%———10.00%—40.00%
1——20.00%———20.00%
2—10.00%————10.00%
3——10.00%———10.00%
4—10.00%————10.00%
5+10.00%—————10.00%
Total40.00%20.00%30.00%—10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.70 1.20 +0.50
SD 2.06 1.32 2.64
CV 1.21 1.10 —
Max 6 4 +6
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
120.00%20.00%————40.00%
230.00%—————30.00%
3———10.00%——10.00%
410.00%—————10.00%
5+—10.00%————10.00%
Total60.00%30.00%—10.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.30 0.60 +1.70
SD 1.64 0.97 1.70
CV 0.71 1.61 —
Max 6 3 +5
Min 1 0 +0

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—20.00%———20.00%40.00%
1—10.00%————10.00%
210.00%20.00%——10.00%—40.00%
3———————
4———————
5+10.00%—————10.00%
Total20.00%50.00%——10.00%20.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 2.10 -0.60
SD 1.84 2.33 3.60
CV 1.23 1.11 —
Max 6 6 +6
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
030.00%10.00%20.00%10.00%——70.00%
1—20.00%————20.00%
2———10.00%——10.00%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total30.00%30.00%20.00%20.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.40 1.30 -0.90
SD 0.70 1.16 1.10
CV 1.75 0.89 —
Max 2 3 +0
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%——10.00%——20.00%
1—20.00%10.00%——20.00%50.00%
2—10.00%————10.00%
3—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
4———————
5+———————
Total10.00%40.00%20.00%10.00%—20.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.30 2.20 -0.90
SD 1.06 1.93 2.33
CV 0.81 0.88 —
Max 3 6 +2
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 10

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Ararat 1363 20 13.46 +6.54 66.0% 8 10 12 13 15 17 19
Homenetmen Yerevan 1333 19 14.39 +4.61 54.0% 8 10 13 14 16 18 19
Shirak 1294 24 14.17 +9.83 93.0% 9 10 13 14 16 18 19
Araks Ararat 1121 16 10.81 +5.19 61.0% 5 7 9 11 12 14 17
Kotayk 1111 15 9.02 +5.98 90.0% 4 5 8 9 10 12 15
Homenmen-FIMA FC 1091 12 11.06 +0.94 24.0% 5 7 10 11 13 15 17
Van Yerevan 1060 13 5.88 +7.12 95.0% 1 2 4 6 7 9 11
Aragats 1033 9 8.59 +0.41 36.0% 2 4 7 9 10 13 15
Aznavour 993 13 8.00 +5.00 72.0% 1 4 6 8 10 12 14
Yerazank 938 5 8.55 -3.55 11.0% 3 5 7 9 10 13 14
Zangezour 934 12 7.41 +4.59 76.0% 3 4 5 7 9 11 13
Banants Kotayk 931 7 8.66 -1.66 10.0% 3 4 7 9 11 12 14

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 5% * Slight Edge: 5% to 10% * Clear Edge: 10% to 14% * Strong Edge: 14% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+18.33%
Strong Edge
46.67%25.00%28.33%
Elo Value
Home Edge
123 Elo
0.008 goals per Elo point
064.42400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.62 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.53+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.07 * Tight Race: 0.07 to 0.19 * Comfortable: 0.19 to 0.27 * Runaway: 0.27 and up.
Title-Race Openness
3.7
Open
123410
Title Margin
Expected
0.40/gm
Runaway
00.170.6/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 1.9 * Some Luck: 1.9 to 2.86 * Lucky: 2.86 to 3.81 * Wild Swing: 3.81 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.54 * Close: 1.54 to 2.31 * Off: 2.31 to 3.08 * Way Off: 3.08 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 12 * As Expected: 12 to 19.2 * Several Outliers: 19.2 to 26.4 * Many Outliers: 26.4 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
2.21 points
Some Luck
02.386
Average Finish Error
Expected
2.50
Off
01.924
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.83%
95.00%
Van Yerevan
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 4.17%
10.00%
Banants Kotayk
050
Season Outliers
Expected
0 of 12
Minimal Outliers
01.26

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.2 * Even: 0.2 to 0.25 * Top-Heavy: 0.25 to 0.28 * Lopsided: 0.28 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 2.25 * Moderate Separation: 2.25 to 2.55 * Strong Separation: 2.55 to 2.8 * Wide Separation: 2.8 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 72.5% * Slight Edge: 72.5% to 85% * Clear Edge: 85% to 89% * Wide Edge: 89% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 93.5% * Clear Edge: 93.5% to 97.5% * Strong Edge: 97.5% to 99% * Dominant: 99% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 47% * Some Drama: 47% to 56% * Frequent: 56% to 64.5% * Very Frequent: 64.5% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 15% * Occasional: 15% to 20.5% * Frequent: 20.5% to 32% * Very Frequent: 32% and up.
Gini Index
0.21
Even
00.20.280.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 154.13
1.32
Coin-Flip Parity
12.252.553.5
Interquartile Edge
74%
Slight Edge
50%72.5%85%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 96%
92%
Even
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
58%
Frequent
0%38%100%
Blowouts
Expected
28%
Frequent
0%40%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.45 * Slight Separation: 0.45 to 0.51 * Notable Separation: 0.51 to 0.57 * Lopsided: 0.57 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.37 * Some Carryover: 0.37 to 0.63 * Strong Carryover: 0.63 to 0.77 * Near-Lock: 0.77 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 16% * As Expected: 16% to 19% * Upset-Prone: 19% to 23% * Very Upset-Prone: 23% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 12.5% * As Expected: 12.5% to 15% * Shaky Favorites: 15% to 19% * Very Shaky: 19% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.58
Predictable
00.572
Matchup Imbalance
0.49
Slight Separation
00.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.87
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.46
Some Carryover
00.370.630.771
Upset Rate
Expected
27%
Very Upset-Prone
0%19%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
16%
Shaky Favorites
0%16%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.21 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.21 to 0.31 * Above Noise: 0.31 to 0.42 * Well Above Noise: 0.42 and up.
Probability calibration
0.90
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.87
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.163
Well Within Noise
00.2080.5

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456
Shirak72.00%16.00%11.00%1.00%——
Araks Ararat10.00%31.00%31.00%14.00%10.00%4.00%
Aznavour3.00%11.00%13.00%16.00%29.00%28.00%
Homenmen-FIMA FC13.00%30.00%24.00%20.00%11.00%2.00%
Zangezour1.00%3.00%11.00%21.00%25.00%39.00%
Yerazank1.00%9.00%10.00%28.00%25.00%27.00%
Team123456
Ararat37.00%47.00%10.00%4.00%2.00%—
Homenetmen Yerevan62.00%29.00%6.00%2.00%—1.00%
Kotayk—5.00%35.00%34.00%19.00%7.00%
Van Yerevan——8.00%13.00%23.00%56.00%
Aragats1.00%9.00%22.00%23.00%27.00%18.00%
Banants Kotayk—10.00%19.00%24.00%29.00%18.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level
Araks Ararat 100%
Aznavour 100%
Homenmen-FIMA FC 100%
Shirak 100%
Yerazank 100%
Zangezour 100%
Team Same level
Aragats 100%
Ararat 100%
Banants Kotayk 100%
Homenetmen Yerevan 100%
Kotayk 100%
Van Yerevan 100%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1995-03-01 Aznavour W 3-033.1 1078 986 58.64% 25.82% 15.55%+1.27 +18.9 3
1995-03-01 @ Araks Ararat L 0-333.1 986 1078 15.55% 25.82% 58.64%-1.27 -18.9 0
1995-03-01 Araks Ararat W 2-033.6 1231 1097 62.08% 25.40% 12.52%+1.62 +10.7 3
1995-03-01 @ Shirak L 0-233.6 1097 1231 12.52% 25.40% 62.08%-1.62 -10.7 3
1995-03-01 Zangezour D 0-047.6 1019 924 58.88% 25.79% 15.32%+1.29 -3.9 1
1995-03-01 @ Yerazank D 0-047.6 924 1019 15.32% 25.79% 58.88%-1.29 +3.9 1
1995-03-01 Homenetmen Yerevan L 1-542.7 1149 1243 37.20% 26.48% 36.32%-0.24 -40.9 0
1995-03-01 @ Banants Kotayk W 5-142.7 1243 1149 36.32% 26.48% 37.20%+0.24 +40.9 3
1995-03-01 Van Yerevan W 6-031.9 1076 1004 56.90% 25.98% 17.12%+1.11 +39.1 3
1995-03-01 @ Kotayk L 0-631.9 1004 1076 17.12% 25.98% 56.90%-1.11 -39.1 0
1995-03-01 Aragats W 10-030.2 1284 1108 64.94% 24.91% 10.15%+1.96 +40.0 6
1995-03-01 @ Homenetmen Yerevan L 0-1030.2 1108 1284 10.15% 24.91% 64.94%-1.96 -40.1 0
1995-03-08 Shirak L 0-140.4 1086 1242 28.81% 26.27% 44.92%-0.74 -11.3 3
1995-03-08 @ Araks Ararat W 1-040.4 1242 1086 44.92% 26.27% 28.81%+0.74 +11.3 6
1995-03-08 Araks Ararat D 0-047.6 1132 1075 55.52% 26.08% 18.40%+0.99 -3.3 1
1995-03-08 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC D 0-047.6 1075 1132 18.40% 26.08% 55.52%-0.99 +3.3 4
1995-03-08 Homenmen-FIMA FC W 3-149.1 928 1129 23.60% 25.98% 50.42%-1.11 +28.7 4
1995-03-08 @ Zangezour L 1-349.1 1129 928 50.42% 25.98% 23.60%+1.11 -28.7 1
1995-03-08 Homenetmen Yerevan D 1-151.4 1251 1324 40.09% 26.51% 33.41%-0.07 -0.5 1
1995-03-08 @ Ararat D 1-151.4 1324 1251 33.41% 26.51% 40.09%+0.07 +0.5 7
1995-03-08 Banants Kotayk W 7-131.5 1324 1108 67.38% 24.36% 8.26%+2.29 +16.7 10
1995-03-08 @ Homenetmen Yerevan L 1-731.5 1108 1324 8.26% 24.36% 67.38%-2.29 -16.7 0
1995-03-08 Ararat L 0-631.3 965 1250 15.73% 25.14% 59.13%-1.80 -35.9 0
1995-03-08 @ Van Yerevan W 6-031.3 1250 965 59.13% 25.14% 15.73%+1.80 +35.9 4
1995-03-15 Homenmen-FIMA FC W 1-044.2 968 1100 31.81% 26.37% 41.82%-0.56 +15.0 3
1995-03-15 @ Aznavour L 0-144.2 1100 968 41.82% 26.37% 31.81%+0.56 -15.0 1
1995-03-15 Aznavour D 0-047.5 1015 983 52.96% 26.24% 20.80%+0.79 -2.8 2
1995-03-15 @ Yerazank D 0-047.5 983 1015 20.80% 26.24% 52.96%-0.79 +2.8 4
1995-03-15 Aznavour L 1-249.2 957 985 45.96% 26.47% 27.57%+0.29 -15.3 4
1995-03-15 @ Zangezour W 2-149.2 985 957 27.57% 26.47% 45.96%-0.29 +15.3 7
1995-03-15 Ararat L 2-345.9 1068 1286 21.73% 25.84% 52.43%-1.25 -8.1 0
1995-03-15 @ Aragats W 3-245.9 1286 1068 52.43% 25.84% 21.73%+1.25 +8.1 7
1995-03-15 Aragats D 0-047.6 1115 1060 55.29% 26.10% 18.61%+0.97 -3.2 4
1995-03-15 @ Kotayk D 0-047.6 1060 1115 18.61% 26.10% 55.29%-0.97 +3.2 1
1995-03-15 Aragats W 2-148.0 929 1063 31.56% 26.37% 42.07%-0.57 +14.2 3
1995-03-15 @ Van Yerevan L 1-248.0 1063 929 42.07% 26.37% 31.56%+0.57 -14.2 1
1995-03-22 Homenmen-FIMA FC W 1-039.2 1078 1085 48.55% 26.41% 25.04%+0.47 +10.2 7
1995-03-22 @ Araks Ararat L 0-139.2 1085 1078 25.04% 26.41% 48.55%-0.47 -10.2 1
1995-03-22 Zangezour L 1-252.0 1001 942 55.67% 26.07% 18.26%+1.01 -18.2 7
1995-03-22 @ Aznavour W 2-152.0 942 1001 18.26% 26.07% 55.67%-1.01 +18.2 7
1995-03-22 Yerazank D 1-151.5 1253 1012 68.75% 23.98% 7.27%+2.49 -5.3 7
1995-03-22 @ Shirak D 1-151.5 1012 1253 7.27% 23.98% 68.75%-2.49 +5.3 3
1995-03-22 Van Yerevan W 4-241.9 1049 943 59.86% 25.69% 14.45%+1.39 +9.4 4
1995-03-22 @ Aragats L 2-441.9 943 1049 14.45% 25.69% 59.86%-1.39 -9.4 3
1995-03-22 Kotayk W 2-143.4 1092 1112 46.98% 26.45% 26.57%+0.36 +10.0 3
1995-03-22 @ Banants Kotayk L 1-243.4 1112 1092 26.57% 26.45% 46.98%-0.36 -10.0 4
1995-03-22 Ararat D 1-151.9 1341 1294 54.45% 26.15% 19.40%+0.91 -2.7 11
1995-03-22 @ Homenetmen Yerevan D 1-151.9 1294 1341 19.40% 26.15% 54.45%-0.91 +2.7 8
1995-03-29 Shirak D 3-358.5 1075 1248 26.73% 26.17% 47.10%-0.88 +0.9 2
1995-03-29 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC D 3-358.5 1248 1075 47.10% 26.17% 26.73%+0.88 -0.9 8
1995-03-29 Aznavour W 2-031.2 1247 982 69.93% 23.61% 6.46%+2.68 +5.7 11
1995-03-29 @ Shirak L 0-231.2 982 1247 6.46% 23.61% 69.93%-2.68 -5.7 7
1995-03-29 Araks Ararat W 3-251.8 960 1088 32.38% 26.39% 41.23%-0.52 +13.3 10
1995-03-29 @ Zangezour L 2-351.8 1088 960 41.23% 26.39% 32.38%+0.52 -13.3 7
1995-03-29 Banants Kotayk L 3-462.1 1297 1102 66.18% 24.65% 9.17%+2.12 -20.0 8
1995-03-29 @ Ararat W 4-362.1 1102 1297 9.17% 24.65% 66.18%-2.12 +20.0 6
1995-03-29 Aragats L 4-561.2 1122 1058 56.08% 26.04% 17.88%+1.04 -16.7 6
1995-03-29 @ Banants Kotayk W 5-461.2 1058 1122 17.88% 26.04% 56.08%-1.04 +16.7 7
1995-03-29 Homenetmen Yerevan L 0-133.5 934 1338 8.71% 23.43% 67.87%-2.77 -3.9 3
1995-03-29 @ Van Yerevan W 1-033.5 1338 934 67.87% 23.43% 8.71%+2.77 +4.0 14
1995-04-05 Yerazank W 2-038.8 977 1017 44.43% 26.49% 29.08%+0.20 +21.5 10
1995-04-05 @ Aznavour L 0-238.8 1017 977 29.08% 26.49% 44.43%-0.20 -21.5 3
1995-04-05 Araks Ararat L 0-340.4 996 1075 39.23% 26.50% 34.27%-0.12 -39.1 3
1995-04-05 @ Yerazank W 3-040.4 1075 996 34.27% 26.50% 39.23%+0.12 +39.1 10
1995-04-05 Shirak D 1-151.1 973 1252 16.21% 25.22% 58.57%-1.75 +3.4 11
1995-04-05 @ Zangezour D 1-151.1 1252 973 58.57% 25.22% 16.21%+1.75 -3.4 12
1995-04-05 Kotayk D 0-047.4 1075 1102 46.19% 26.47% 27.35%+0.31 -1.6 8
1995-04-05 @ Aragats D 0-047.4 1102 1075 27.35% 26.47% 46.19%-0.31 +1.6 5
1995-04-05 Homenetmen Yerevan W 2-151.9 1103 1342 19.72% 25.65% 54.63%-1.42 +17.8 8
1995-04-05 @ Kotayk L 1-251.9 1342 1103 54.63% 25.65% 19.72%+1.42 -17.8 14
1995-04-05 Banants Kotayk W 6-041.0 930 1105 26.44% 26.16% 47.40%-0.90 +87.1 6
1995-04-05 @ Van Yerevan L 0-641.0 1105 930 47.40% 26.16% 26.44%+0.90 -87.1 6
1995-04-12 Aznavour W 3-138.9 1076 998 57.41% 25.93% 16.65%+1.16 +11.9 5
1995-04-12 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC L 1-338.9 998 1076 16.65% 25.93% 57.41%-1.16 -11.9 10
1995-04-12 Homenmen-FIMA FC W 4-030.6 1249 1088 64.00% 25.09% 10.91%+1.84 +18.0 15
1995-04-12 @ Shirak L 0-430.6 1088 1249 10.91% 25.09% 64.00%-1.84 -18.0 5
1995-04-12 Yerazank D 1-150.7 977 957 51.65% 26.30% 22.05%+0.69 -2.3 12
1995-04-12 @ Zangezour D 1-150.7 957 977 22.05% 26.30% 51.65%-0.69 +2.3 4
1995-04-12 Aragats W 5-029.3 1277 1074 66.66% 24.54% 8.81%+2.18 +18.1 11
1995-04-12 @ Ararat L 0-529.3 1074 1277 8.81% 24.54% 66.66%-2.18 -18.1 8
1995-04-12 Ararat L 0-831.7 1018 1295 16.38% 25.24% 58.38%-1.74 -48.9 6
1995-04-12 @ Banants Kotayk W 8-031.7 1295 1018 58.38% 25.24% 16.38%+1.74 +48.9 14
1995-04-12 Kotayk W 2-146.8 1017 1121 35.66% 26.46% 37.88%-0.33 +13.1 9
1995-04-12 @ Van Yerevan L 1-246.8 1121 1017 37.88% 26.46% 35.66%+0.33 -13.1 8
1995-04-19 Zangezour W 5-134.6 1114 974 62.48% 25.34% 12.18%+1.66 +16.6 13
1995-04-19 @ Araks Ararat L 1-534.6 974 1114 12.18% 25.34% 62.48%-1.66 -16.6 12
1995-04-19 Araks Ararat W 3-252.4 986 1130 30.29% 26.32% 43.39%-0.65 +13.8 13
1995-04-19 @ Aznavour L 2-352.4 1130 986 43.39% 26.32% 30.29%+0.65 -13.8 13
1995-04-19 Shirak L 0-233.8 959 1267 14.07% 24.86% 61.07%-1.99 -11.7 4
1995-04-19 @ Yerazank W 2-033.8 1267 959 61.07% 24.86% 14.07%+1.99 +11.7 18
1995-04-19 Homenetmen Yerevan L 0-333.6 1056 1324 17.07% 25.34% 57.60%-1.67 -20.2 8
1995-04-19 @ Aragats W 3-033.6 1324 1056 57.60% 25.34% 17.07%+1.67 +20.2 17
1995-04-19 Banants Kotayk W 4-136.0 1108 969 62.43% 25.35% 12.22%+1.66 +12.9 11
1995-04-19 @ Kotayk L 1-436.0 969 1108 12.22% 25.35% 62.43%-1.66 -12.9 6
1995-04-19 Van Yerevan D 1-151.9 1345 1030 72.24% 22.75% 5.00%+3.09 -5.8 18
1995-04-19 @ Homenetmen Yerevan D 1-151.9 1030 1345 5.00% 22.75% 72.24%-3.09 +5.8 10
1995-04-26 Shirak L 0-136.3 1000 1279 16.27% 25.22% 58.50%-1.75 -7.1 13
1995-04-26 @ Aznavour W 1-036.3 1279 1000 58.50% 25.22% 16.27%+1.75 +7.1 21
1995-04-26 Yerazank W 1-035.4 1070 947 61.20% 25.52% 13.28%+1.53 +6.0 8
1995-04-26 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC L 0-135.4 947 1070 13.28% 25.52% 61.20%-1.53 -6.0 4
1995-04-26 Zangezour W 6-130.5 1286 958 72.82% 22.51% 4.67%+3.20 +7.9 24
1995-04-26 @ Shirak L 1-630.5 958 1286 4.67% 22.51% 72.82%-3.20 -7.9 12
1995-04-26 Banants Kotayk D 2-254.8 1035 956 57.57% 25.92% 16.51%+1.17 -2.4 9
1995-04-26 @ Aragats D 2-254.8 956 1035 16.51% 25.92% 57.57%-1.17 +2.4 7
1995-04-26 Kotayk L 2-359.5 1344 1121 67.78% 24.25% 7.96%+2.35 -21.0 14
1995-04-26 @ Ararat W 3-259.5 1121 1344 7.96% 24.25% 67.78%-2.35 +21.0 14
1995-04-26 Van Yerevan L 0-241.9 959 1036 39.51% 26.50% 33.99%-0.10 -27.1 7
1995-04-26 @ Banants Kotayk W 2-041.9 1036 959 33.99% 26.50% 39.51%+0.10 +27.1 13
1995-05-03 Yerazank W 3-242.0 1117 941 64.94% 24.91% 10.15%+1.96 +4.2 16
1995-05-03 @ Araks Ararat L 2-342.0 941 1117 10.15% 24.91% 64.94%-1.96 -4.2 4
1995-05-03 Zangezour W 3-032.3 1076 950 61.46% 25.49% 13.06%+1.55 +16.2 11
1995-05-03 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC L 0-332.3 950 1076 13.06% 25.49% 61.46%-1.55 -16.2 12
1995-05-03 Homenmen-FIMA FC D 0-047.5 937 1092 28.90% 26.27% 44.83%-0.74 +1.3 5
1995-05-03 @ Yerazank D 0-047.5 1092 937 44.83% 26.27% 28.90%+0.74 -1.3 12
1995-05-03 Van Yerevan W 1-033.0 1323 1063 69.73% 23.68% 6.59%+2.65 +3.1 17
1995-05-03 @ Ararat L 0-133.0 1063 1323 6.59% 23.68% 69.73%-2.65 -3.1 13
1995-05-03 Ararat L 0-435.5 1142 1326 25.40% 26.10% 48.50%-0.98 -36.6 14
1995-05-03 @ Kotayk W 4-035.5 1326 1142 48.50% 26.10% 25.40%+0.98 +36.6 20
1995-05-03 Kotayk D 0-048.4 1339 1105 68.34% 24.10% 7.56%+2.43 -5.8 19
1995-05-03 @ Homenetmen Yerevan D 0-048.4 1105 1339 7.56% 24.10% 68.34%-2.43 +5.8 15

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1995-04-26 7.96% Kotayk 1121 3 @ Ararat 1344 2
2 1995-03-29 9.17% Banants Kotayk 1102 4 @ Ararat 1297 3
3 1995-03-29 17.88% Aragats 1058 5 @ Banants Kotayk 1122 4
4 1995-03-22 18.26% Zangezour 942 2 @ Aznavour 1001 1
5 1995-04-05 19.72% @ Kotayk 1103 2 Homenetmen Yerevan 1342 1
6 1995-03-08 23.60% @ Zangezour 928 3 Homenmen-FIMA FC 1129 1
7 1995-04-05 26.44% @ Van Yerevan 930 6 Banants Kotayk 1105 0
8 1995-03-15 27.57% Aznavour 985 2 @ Zangezour 957 1
9 1995-04-19 30.29% @ Aznavour 986 3 Araks Ararat 1130 2
10 1995-03-15 31.56% @ Van Yerevan 929 2 Aragats 1063 1
11 1995-03-15 31.81% @ Aznavour 968 1 Homenmen-FIMA FC 1100 0
12 1995-03-29 32.38% @ Zangezour 960 3 Araks Ararat 1088 2
13 1995-04-26 33.99% Van Yerevan 1036 2 @ Banants Kotayk 959 0
14 1995-04-05 34.27% Araks Ararat 1075 3 @ Yerazank 996 0
15 1995-04-12 35.66% @ Van Yerevan 1017 2 Kotayk 1121 1
16 1995-03-01 36.32% Homenetmen Yerevan 1243 5 @ Banants Kotayk 1149 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1995-04-05 87.09 @ Van Yerevan 6 930 26.44% Banants Kotayk 0 1105 47.40% 26.16%
2 1995-04-12 48.92 Ararat 8 1295 58.38% @ Banants Kotayk 0 1018 16.38% 25.24%
3 1995-03-01 40.91 Homenetmen Yerevan 5 1243 36.32% @ Banants Kotayk 1 1149 37.20% 26.48%
4 1995-03-01 40.05 @ Homenetmen Yerevan 10 1284 64.94% Aragats 0 1108 10.15% 24.91%
5 1995-03-01 39.14 @ Kotayk 6 1076 56.90% Van Yerevan 0 1004 17.12% 25.98%
6 1995-04-05 39.12 Araks Ararat 3 1075 34.27% @ Yerazank 0 996 39.23% 26.50%
7 1995-05-03 36.64 Ararat 4 1326 48.50% @ Kotayk 0 1142 25.40% 26.10%
8 1995-03-08 35.92 Ararat 6 1250 59.13% @ Van Yerevan 0 965 15.73% 25.14%
9 1995-03-08 28.66 @ Zangezour 3 928 23.60% Homenmen-FIMA FC 1 1129 50.42% 25.98%
10 1995-04-26 27.08 Van Yerevan 2 1036 33.99% @ Banants Kotayk 0 959 39.51% 26.50%
11 1995-04-05 21.54 @ Aznavour 2 977 44.43% Yerazank 0 1017 29.08% 26.49%
12 1995-04-26 21.00 Kotayk 3 1121 7.96% @ Ararat 2 1344 67.78% 24.25%
13 1995-04-19 20.17 Homenetmen Yerevan 3 1324 57.60% @ Aragats 0 1056 17.07% 25.34%
14 1995-03-29 20.02 Banants Kotayk 4 1102 9.17% @ Ararat 3 1297 66.18% 24.65%
15 1995-03-01 18.85 @ Araks Ararat 3 1078 58.64% Aznavour 0 986 15.55% 25.82%
16 1995-03-22 18.21 Zangezour 2 942 18.26% @ Aznavour 1 1001 55.67% 26.07%
17 1995-04-12 18.11 @ Ararat 5 1277 66.66% Aragats 0 1074 8.81% 24.54%
18 1995-04-12 17.97 @ Shirak 4 1249 64.00% Homenmen-FIMA FC 0 1088 10.91% 25.09%
19 1995-04-05 17.80 @ Kotayk 2 1103 19.72% Homenetmen Yerevan 1 1342 54.63% 25.65%
20 1995-03-29 16.74 Aragats 5 1058 17.88% @ Banants Kotayk 4 1122 56.08% 26.04%
21 1995-03-08 16.69 @ Homenetmen Yerevan 7 1324 67.38% Banants Kotayk 1 1108 8.26% 24.36%
22 1995-04-19 16.56 @ Araks Ararat 5 1114 62.48% Zangezour 1 974 12.18% 25.34%
23 1995-05-03 16.19 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC 3 1076 61.46% Zangezour 0 950 13.06% 25.49%
24 1995-03-15 15.31 Aznavour 2 985 27.57% @ Zangezour 1 957 45.96% 26.47%
25 1995-03-15 15.00 @ Aznavour 1 968 31.81% Homenmen-FIMA FC 0 1100 41.82% 26.37%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1995-03-29 62.1 Banants Kotayk 4 1102 9.17% @ Ararat 3 1297 66.18% 24.65%
2 1995-03-29 61.2 Aragats 5 1058 17.88% @ Banants Kotayk 4 1122 56.08% 26.04%
3 1995-04-26 59.5 Kotayk 3 1121 7.96% @ Ararat 2 1344 67.78% 24.25%
4 1995-03-29 58.5 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC 3 1075 26.73% Shirak 3 1248 47.10% 26.17%
5 1995-04-26 54.8 @ Aragats 2 1035 57.57% Banants Kotayk 2 956 16.51% 25.92%
6 1995-04-19 52.4 @ Aznavour 3 986 30.29% Araks Ararat 2 1130 43.39% 26.32%
7 1995-03-22 52.0 Zangezour 2 942 18.26% @ Aznavour 1 1001 55.67% 26.07%
8 1995-03-22 51.9 @ Homenetmen Yerevan 1 1341 54.45% Ararat 1 1294 19.40% 26.15%
9 1995-04-05 51.9 @ Kotayk 2 1103 19.72% Homenetmen Yerevan 1 1342 54.63% 25.65%
10 1995-04-19 51.9 @ Homenetmen Yerevan 1 1345 72.24% Van Yerevan 1 1030 5.00% 22.75%
11 1995-03-29 51.8 @ Zangezour 3 960 32.38% Araks Ararat 2 1088 41.23% 26.39%
12 1995-03-22 51.5 @ Shirak 1 1253 68.75% Yerazank 1 1012 7.27% 23.98%
13 1995-03-08 51.4 @ Ararat 1 1251 40.09% Homenetmen Yerevan 1 1324 33.41% 26.51%
14 1995-04-05 51.1 @ Zangezour 1 973 16.21% Shirak 1 1252 58.57% 25.22%
15 1995-04-12 50.7 @ Zangezour 1 977 51.65% Yerazank 1 957 22.05% 26.30%
16 1995-03-15 49.2 Aznavour 2 985 27.57% @ Zangezour 1 957 45.96% 26.47%
17 1995-03-08 49.1 @ Zangezour 3 928 23.60% Homenmen-FIMA FC 1 1129 50.42% 25.98%
18 1995-05-03 48.4 @ Homenetmen Yerevan 0 1339 68.34% Kotayk 0 1105 7.56% 24.10%
19 1995-03-15 48.0 @ Van Yerevan 2 929 31.56% Aragats 1 1063 42.07% 26.37%
20 1995-03-01 47.6 @ Yerazank 0 1019 58.88% Zangezour 0 924 15.32% 25.79%
21 1995-03-08 47.6 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC 0 1132 55.52% Araks Ararat 0 1075 18.40% 26.08%
22 1995-03-15 47.6 @ Kotayk 0 1115 55.29% Aragats 0 1060 18.61% 26.10%
23 1995-03-15 47.5 @ Yerazank 0 1015 52.96% Aznavour 0 983 20.80% 26.24%
24 1995-05-03 47.5 @ Yerazank 0 937 28.90% Homenmen-FIMA FC 0 1092 44.83% 26.27%
25 1995-04-05 47.4 @ Aragats 0 1075 46.19% Kotayk 0 1102 27.35% 26.47%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1995-04-12 29.3 @ Ararat 5 1277 66.66% Aragats 0 1074 8.81% 24.54%
2 1995-03-01 30.2 @ Homenetmen Yerevan 10 1284 64.94% Aragats 0 1108 10.15% 24.91%
3 1995-04-26 30.5 @ Shirak 6 1286 72.82% Zangezour 1 958 4.67% 22.51%
4 1995-04-12 30.6 @ Shirak 4 1249 64.00% Homenmen-FIMA FC 0 1088 10.91% 25.09%
5 1995-03-29 31.2 @ Shirak 2 1247 69.93% Aznavour 0 982 6.46% 23.61%
6 1995-03-08 31.3 Ararat 6 1250 59.13% @ Van Yerevan 0 965 15.73% 25.14%
7 1995-03-08 31.5 @ Homenetmen Yerevan 7 1324 67.38% Banants Kotayk 1 1108 8.26% 24.36%
8 1995-04-12 31.7 Ararat 8 1295 58.38% @ Banants Kotayk 0 1018 16.38% 25.24%
9 1995-03-01 31.9 @ Kotayk 6 1076 56.90% Van Yerevan 0 1004 17.12% 25.98%
10 1995-05-03 32.3 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC 3 1076 61.46% Zangezour 0 950 13.06% 25.49%
11 1995-05-03 33.0 @ Ararat 1 1323 69.73% Van Yerevan 0 1063 6.59% 23.68%
12 1995-03-01 33.1 @ Araks Ararat 3 1078 58.64% Aznavour 0 986 15.55% 25.82%
13 1995-03-29 33.5 Homenetmen Yerevan 1 1338 67.87% @ Van Yerevan 0 934 8.71% 23.43%
14 1995-03-01 33.6 @ Shirak 2 1231 62.08% Araks Ararat 0 1097 12.52% 25.40%
15 1995-04-19 33.6 Homenetmen Yerevan 3 1324 57.60% @ Aragats 0 1056 17.07% 25.34%
16 1995-04-19 33.8 Shirak 2 1267 61.07% @ Yerazank 0 959 14.07% 24.86%
17 1995-04-19 34.6 @ Araks Ararat 5 1114 62.48% Zangezour 1 974 12.18% 25.34%
18 1995-04-26 35.4 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC 1 1070 61.20% Yerazank 0 947 13.28% 25.52%
19 1995-05-03 35.5 Ararat 4 1326 48.50% @ Kotayk 0 1142 25.40% 26.10%
20 1995-04-19 36.0 @ Kotayk 4 1108 62.43% Banants Kotayk 1 969 12.22% 25.35%
21 1995-04-26 36.3 Shirak 1 1279 58.50% @ Aznavour 0 1000 16.27% 25.22%
22 1995-04-05 38.8 @ Aznavour 2 977 44.43% Yerazank 0 1017 29.08% 26.49%
23 1995-04-12 38.9 @ Homenmen-FIMA FC 3 1076 57.41% Aznavour 1 998 16.65% 25.93%
24 1995-03-22 39.2 @ Araks Ararat 1 1078 48.55% Homenmen-FIMA FC 0 1085 25.04% 26.41%
25 1995-03-08 40.4 Shirak 1 1242 44.92% @ Araks Ararat 0 1086 28.81% 26.27%