‹ ›

2003 Meistriliiga Season

112 games

Final

Champion

Flora

76 points · 7th Title

Last Title: 2002

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Flora

12.07 points above expected

76 points · 63.93 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Tulevik Viljandi

8.14 points below expected

30 points · 38.14 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Flora Champion 28 24 4 0 76 105 21 +84 63.93 +12.07
2 TVMK 28 20 5 3 65 82 26 +56 60.89 +4.11
3 Maardu Levadia 28 15 4 9 49 54 30 +24 51.19 -2.19
4 Narva Trans 28 14 5 9 47 58 43 +15 42.22 +4.78
5 Tulevik Viljandi 28 8 6 14 30 44 56 -12 38.14 -8.14
6 Levadia Tallinn 28 8 4 16 28 44 63 -19 32.23 -4.23
7 Valga 28 3 8 17 17 25 63 -38 16.90 +0.10
8 Kuressaare 28 1 2 25 5 11 121 -110 12.26 -7.26

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Flora 76 63.93 +12.07
2 Narva Trans 47 42.22 +4.78
3 TVMK 65 60.89 +4.11
4 Valga 17 16.90 +0.10
5 Maardu Levadia 49 51.19 -2.19

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Tulevik Viljandi 30 38.14 -8.14
2 Kuressaare 5 12.26 -7.26
3 Levadia Tallinn 28 32.23 -4.23
4 Maardu Levadia 49 51.19 -2.19
5 Valga 17 16.90 +0.10

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Flora 12 Jul 29 – Oct 17 1 in 40
2 Narva Trans 4 Sep 13 – Oct 4 1 in 30
3 TVMK 8 Aug 4 – Sep 28 1 in 11
4 Maardu Levadia 5 Jul 10 – Aug 4 1 in 9
5 Levadia Tallinn 2 Aug 24 – Sep 1 1 in 7

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Kuressaare 19 Jun 14 – Nov 2 1 in 106
2 Maardu Levadia 4 May 22 – Jun 21 1 in 60
3 Tulevik Viljandi 6 Aug 17 – Sep 28 1 in 30
4 Levadia Tallinn 4 Jul 31 – Aug 18 1 in 16
5 Valga 5 Aug 23 – Sep 24 1 in 3

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Flora 28 Mar 9 – Nov 2 1 in 77
2 TVMK 15 Mar 14 – Jul 20 1 in 27
3 Narva Trans 5 Apr 20 – May 22 1 in 25
4 Valga 3 Aug 9 – Aug 18 1 in 13
5 Kuressaare 2 Apr 14 – Apr 19 1 in 7

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Maardu Levadia 5 May 13 – Jun 21 1 in 64
2 Tulevik Viljandi 7 Mar 20 – May 13 1 in 24
3 Valga 15 Mar 9 – Aug 4 1 in 9
4 Levadia Tallinn 4 Apr 15 – May 5 1 in 8
5 TVMK 2 Jul 11 – Jul 15 1 in 8

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Flora 1512 76 +45 13 11.4 +1.6
TVMK 1357 65 -46 9 10.5 -1.5
Maardu Levadia 1250 49 +34 8 9.5 -1.5
Narva Trans 1141 47 +3 7 5.7 +1.3
Tulevik Viljandi 1020 30 +28 9 6.8 +2.2
Levadia Tallinn 915 28 -13 5 6.6 -1.6
Valga 819 17 +15 5 4.4 +0.6
Kuressaare 545 5 -50 0 1.4 -1.4

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team FLO KUR LT ML NT TVM TV VAL
Flora —
4-0-0
10.78
4-0-0
9.85
4-0-0
7.76
2-2-0
9.23
2-2-0
6.21
4-0-0
9.53
4-0-0
10.52
Kuressaare
0-0-4
0.72
—
0-0-4
2.04
0-0-4
1.10
0-0-4
1.31
0-0-4
0.73
0-1-3
1.66
1-1-2
4.05
Levadia Tallinn
0-0-4
1.51
4-0-0
9.28
—
0-1-3
2.98
1-0-3
3.67
0-1-3
1.77
2-0-2
4.74
1-2-1
8.51
Maardu Levadia
0-0-4
3.54
4-0-0
10.31
3-1-0
8.32
—
3-0-1
6.86
0-1-3
3.99
3-0-1
7.96
2-2-0
10.06
Narva Trans
0-2-2
2.09
4-0-0
10.07
3-0-1
7.62
1-0-3
4.42
—
1-0-3
2.72
2-2-0
6.19
3-1-0
9.50
TVMK
0-2-2
5.07
4-0-0
10.75
3-1-0
9.58
3-1-0
7.30
3-0-1
8.59
—
3-1-0
9.13
4-0-0
10.40
Tulevik Viljandi
0-0-4
1.81
3-1-0
9.69
2-0-2
6.54
1-0-3
3.33
0-2-2
5.09
0-1-3
2.20
—
2-2-0
9.19
Valga
0-0-4
0.91
2-1-1
7.24
1-2-1
2.80
0-2-2
1.32
0-1-3
1.84
0-0-4
1.02
0-2-2
2.14
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.96 +7.9
Allowed 0.81 -6.7
Differential 0.95 +3.9

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
08.04%3.57%4.91%5.36%3.57%4.46%29.91%
13.57%3.57%4.02%5.80%3.57%2.23%22.77%
24.91%4.02%3.57%1.34%0.89%—14.73%
35.36%5.80%1.34%0.89%0.89%0.89%15.18%
43.57%3.57%0.89%0.89%0.89%—9.82%
5+4.46%2.23%—0.89%——7.59%
Total29.91%22.77%14.73%15.18%9.82%7.59%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.89 1.89 +0.00
SD 2.09 2.09 3.33
CV 1.10 1.10 —
Max 17 17 +17
Min 0 0 -17

Games Played: 112

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.57%—————3.57%
13.57%—————3.57%
214.29%7.14%7.14%———28.57%
33.57%17.86%3.57%———25.00%
47.14%7.14%——3.57%—17.86%
5+14.29%7.14%————21.43%
Total46.43%39.29%10.71%—3.57%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.75 0.75 +3.00
SD 3.07 0.93 3.30
CV 0.82 1.24 —
Max 17 4 +17
Min 0 0 +0

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%3.57%10.71%14.29%10.71%28.57%75.00%
1———7.14%3.57%3.57%14.29%
2—3.57%——3.57%—7.14%
3—————3.57%3.57%
4———————
5+———————
Total7.14%7.14%10.71%21.43%17.86%35.71%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.39 4.32 -3.93
SD 0.79 3.36 3.38
CV 2.00 0.78 —
Max 3 17 +1
Min 0 0 -17

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%7.14%3.57%7.14%3.57%—28.57%
1—7.14%3.57%10.71%14.29%3.57%39.29%
2—10.71%—3.57%——14.29%
3—3.57%————3.57%
4——7.14%———7.14%
5+3.57%——3.57%——7.14%
Total10.71%28.57%14.29%25.00%17.86%3.57%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.57 2.25 -0.68
SD 1.97 1.51 2.57
CV 1.25 0.67 —
Max 9 6 +6
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%7.14%7.14%3.57%——25.00%
110.71%7.14%3.57%3.57%7.14%—32.14%
210.71%—————10.71%
310.71%—3.57%———14.29%
43.57%—————3.57%
5+7.14%3.57%—3.57%——14.29%
Total50.00%17.86%14.29%10.71%7.14%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.93 1.07 +0.86
SD 1.96 1.33 2.62
CV 1.02 1.24 —
Max 7 4 +7
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.57%3.57%3.57%—3.57%—14.29%
110.71%3.57%7.14%3.57%—3.57%28.57%
23.57%3.57%10.71%———17.86%
310.71%7.14%3.57%—3.57%3.57%28.57%
43.57%——3.57%——7.14%
5+3.57%—————3.57%
Total35.71%17.86%25.00%7.14%7.14%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.07 1.54 +0.54
SD 1.68 1.57 2.47
CV 0.81 1.03 —
Max 8 5 +8
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%—7.14%———14.29%
1—3.57%—3.57%——7.14%
27.14%3.57%3.57%———14.29%
314.29%10.71%————25.00%
410.71%10.71%—3.57%3.57%—28.57%
5+3.57%7.14%————10.71%
Total42.86%35.71%10.71%7.14%3.57%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.93 0.93 +2.00
SD 1.86 1.09 2.21
CV 0.64 1.17 —
Max 8 4 +7
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.71%3.57%7.14%3.57%3.57%3.57%32.14%
1—3.57%7.14%7.14%—3.57%21.43%
23.57%3.57%3.57%3.57%3.57%—17.86%
33.57%7.14%—3.57%3.57%—17.86%
43.57%3.57%————7.14%
5+3.57%—————3.57%
Total25.00%21.43%17.86%17.86%10.71%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.57 2.00 -0.43
SD 1.48 1.89 2.66
CV 0.94 0.94 —
Max 5 8 +5
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
017.86%3.57%—14.29%7.14%3.57%46.43%
13.57%3.57%10.71%10.71%3.57%3.57%35.71%
2——3.57%3.57%——7.14%
3———3.57%——3.57%
4—7.14%————7.14%
5+———————
Total21.43%14.29%14.29%32.14%10.71%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.89 2.25 -1.36
SD 1.17 1.73 2.13
CV 1.31 0.77 —
Max 4 7 +3
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 28

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Flora 1512 76 63.93 +12.07 98.0% 48 54 60 64 68 73 79
TVMK 1357 65 60.89 +4.11 76.0% 45 52 57 61 65 69 72
Maardu Levadia 1250 49 51.19 -2.19 41.0% 34 39 46 50 55 63 73
Narva Trans 1141 47 42.22 +4.78 78.0% 28 31 38 42 47 52 57
Tulevik Viljandi 1020 30 38.14 -8.14 10.0% 23 28 33 38 42 49 56
Levadia Tallinn 915 28 32.23 -4.23 26.0% 20 23 28 33 36 40 50
Valga 819 17 16.90 +0.10 59.0% 6 9 13 16 20 25 29
Kuressaare 545 5 12.26 -7.26 2.0% 5 6 9 12 15 20 23

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 1% * Slight Edge: 1% to 4.5% * Clear Edge: 4.5% to 7.5% * Strong Edge: 7.5% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+6.25%
Clear Edge
44.64%16.96%38.39%
Elo Value
Home Edge: 21.74 Elo pts.
136 Elo
0.007 goals per Elo point
0400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.33 goals
Neutral
-2+0.16+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 4th * Longshot: 5th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.1 * Tight Race: 0.1 to 0.19 * Comfortable: 0.19 to 0.38 * Runaway: 0.38 and up.
Title-Race Openness
1.9
One-Team Race
12348
Champion Preseason Odds
66%
Flora, 1st of 8
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.39/gm
Runaway
00.220.6/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 4.63 * Some Luck: 4.63 to 6.94 * Lucky: 6.94 to 9.25 * Wild Swing: 9.25 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 0.35 * Close: 0.35 to 0.53 * Off: 0.53 to 0.7 * Way Off: 0.7 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 8 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 8 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 8 * As Expected: 8 to 12.8 * Several Outliers: 12.8 to 17.6 * Many Outliers: 17.6 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
6.39 points
Some Luck
05.7814
Average Finish Error
Expected
0.00
Pinpoint
00.441
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 93.75%
98.00%
Flora
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
2.00%
Kuressaare
06.25%50
Season Outliers
Expected
2 of 8
Minimal Outliers
00.88

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.27 * Even: 0.27 to 0.29 * Top-Heavy: 0.29 to 0.31 * Lopsided: 0.31 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 2.7 * Moderate Separation: 2.7 to 3 * Strong Separation: 3 to 3.3 * Wide Separation: 3.3 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 87.5% * Slight Edge: 87.5% to 91% * Clear Edge: 91% to 93.5% * Wide Edge: 93.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 98% * Clear Edge: 98% to 99% * Strong Edge: 99% to 99.5% * Dominant: 99.5% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 43% * Some Drama: 43% to 46% * Frequent: 46% to 50.5% * Very Frequent: 50.5% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 28.5% * Occasional: 28.5% to 34% * Frequent: 34% to 39.5% * Very Frequent: 39.5% and up.
Gini Index
0.32
Lopsided
00.270.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 311.90
3.29
Strong Separation
12.733.33.75
Interquartile Edge
90%
Slight Edge
50%87.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 100%
100%
Dominant
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
37%
Few
0%33%100%
Blowouts
Expected
39%
Frequent
0%47%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.54 * Slight Separation: 0.54 to 0.58 * Notable Separation: 0.58 to 0.63 * Lopsided: 0.63 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.7 * Some Carryover: 0.7 to 0.84 * Strong Carryover: 0.84 to 0.9 * Near-Lock: 0.9 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 12% * As Expected: 12% to 15% * Upset-Prone: 15% to 19% * Very Upset-Prone: 19% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 9% * As Expected: 9% to 11% * Shaky Favorites: 11% to 16% * Very Shaky: 16% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.39
Highly Predictable
00.452
Matchup Imbalance
0.63
Lopsided
00.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.38
Wilder Than Modeled
01.002
Repeatability
0.98
Near-Lock
00.70.841
Upset Rate
Expected
11%
Chalky
0%15%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
6%
Solid Favorites
0%12%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.13 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.13 to 0.2 * Above Noise: 0.2 to 0.26 * Well Above Noise: 0.26 and up.
Probability calibration
0.74
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.65
Very Underconfident
0.1596391.001.84036
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.094
Well Within Noise
00.1310.3

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team12345678
Flora66.00%26.00%6.00%2.00%————
TVMK30.00%57.00%12.00%1.00%————
Maardu Levadia4.00%15.00%58.00%19.00%4.00%———
Narva Trans—1.00%14.00%47.00%31.00%7.00%——
Tulevik Viljandi—1.00%8.00%22.00%40.00%28.00%1.00%—
Levadia Tallinn——2.00%9.00%24.00%61.00%4.00%—
Valga————1.00%4.00%76.00%19.00%
Kuressaare——————19.00%81.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Qualified for relegation playoff Direct relegation
Flora 100% — —
Levadia Tallinn 96.00% 4.00% —
Maardu Levadia 100% — —
Narva Trans 100% — —
TVMK 100% — —
Tulevik Viljandi 99.00% 1.00% —
Valga 5.00% 76.00% 19.00%
Kuressaare — 19.00% 81.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
2003-03-09 Valga W 3-237.9 1258 809 80.29% 15.24% 4.46%+3.45 +2.2 3
2003-03-09 @ Flora L 2-337.9 809 1258 4.46% 15.24% 80.29%-3.45 -2.2 0
2003-03-13 Tulevik Viljandi L 1-237.3 807 1079 13.83% 17.15% 69.02%-1.84 -7.2 0
2003-03-13 @ Valga W 2-137.3 1079 807 69.02% 17.15% 13.83%+1.84 +7.2 3
2003-03-14 TVMK D 2-257.8 1260 1221 49.38% 17.94% 32.68%+0.44 -1.3 4
2003-03-14 @ Flora D 2-257.8 1221 1260 32.68% 17.94% 49.38%-0.44 +1.3 1
2003-03-15 Levadia Tallinn W 1-035.0 1249 1065 65.34% 17.42% 17.23%+1.51 +9.4 3
2003-03-15 @ Maardu Levadia L 0-135.0 1065 1249 17.23% 17.42% 65.34%-1.51 -9.4 0
2003-03-15 Narva Trans L 0-329.5 770 1108 9.93% 16.67% 73.40%-2.32 -15.2 0
2003-03-15 @ Kuressaare W 3-029.5 1108 770 73.40% 16.67% 9.93%+2.32 +15.2 3
2003-03-18 Valga W 4-131.7 1223 800 79.38% 15.51% 5.11%+3.26 +6.6 4
2003-03-18 @ TVMK L 1-431.7 800 1223 5.11% 15.51% 79.38%-3.26 -6.6 0
2003-03-19 Flora L 0-426.2 754 1259 4.18% 15.11% 80.70%-3.54 -8.4 0
2003-03-19 @ Kuressaare W 4-026.2 1259 754 80.70% 15.11% 4.18%+3.54 +8.4 7
2003-03-19 Narva Trans W 1-036.5 1258 1123 60.76% 17.66% 21.58%+1.15 +11.5 6
2003-03-19 @ Maardu Levadia L 0-136.5 1123 1258 21.58% 17.66% 60.76%-1.15 -11.5 3
2003-03-20 Tulevik Viljandi W 2-146.1 1056 1086 39.80% 17.99% 42.20%-0.06 +19.3 3
2003-03-20 @ Levadia Tallinn L 1-246.1 1086 1056 42.20% 17.99% 39.80%+0.06 -19.3 3
2003-04-05 Maardu Levadia L 0-327.7 793 1270 4.85% 15.41% 79.75%-3.34 -7.4 0
2003-04-05 @ Valga W 3-027.7 1270 793 79.75% 15.41% 4.85%+3.34 +7.4 9
2003-04-05 TVMK D 0-050.7 1067 1229 23.25% 17.72% 59.03%-1.03 +4.4 4
2003-04-05 @ Tulevik Viljandi D 0-050.7 1229 1067 59.03% 17.72% 23.25%+1.03 -4.4 5
2003-04-14 Kuressaare D 0-051.0 1071 746 75.09% 16.42% 8.48%+2.55 -8.8 5
2003-04-14 @ Tulevik Viljandi D 0-051.0 746 1071 8.48% 16.42% 75.09%-2.55 +8.8 1
2003-04-15 Levadia Tallinn D 1-153.8 786 1075 12.67% 17.03% 70.29%-1.97 +6.7 1
2003-04-15 @ Valga D 1-153.8 1075 786 70.29% 17.03% 12.67%+1.97 -6.7 4
2003-04-15 Narva Trans W 4-033.0 1225 1111 58.44% 17.74% 23.82%+0.99 +44.9 8
2003-04-15 @ TVMK L 0-433.0 1111 1225 23.82% 17.74% 58.44%-0.99 -44.9 3
2003-04-16 Maardu Levadia W 2-040.8 1267 1277 42.68% 17.99% 39.32%+0.09 +36.4 10
2003-04-16 @ Flora L 0-240.8 1277 1267 39.32% 17.99% 42.68%-0.09 -36.4 9
2003-04-19 Valga W 2-146.4 755 792 38.74% 17.99% 43.27%-0.12 +19.7 4
2003-04-19 @ Kuressaare L 1-246.4 792 755 43.27% 17.99% 38.74%+0.12 -19.7 1
2003-04-20 Narva Trans L 1-246.8 1069 1066 44.41% 17.99% 37.60%+0.18 -20.1 4
2003-04-20 @ Levadia Tallinn W 2-146.8 1066 1069 37.60% 17.99% 44.41%-0.18 +20.1 6
2003-04-20 TVMK D 1-154.0 1241 1270 39.95% 17.99% 42.05%-0.05 +0.2 10
2003-04-20 @ Maardu Levadia D 1-154.0 1270 1241 42.05% 17.99% 39.95%+0.05 -0.2 9
2003-04-21 Tulevik Viljandi W 3-136.0 1303 1063 69.91% 17.07% 13.01%+1.93 +11.8 13
2003-04-21 @ Flora L 1-336.0 1063 1303 13.01% 17.07% 69.91%-1.93 -11.8 5
2003-04-26 Flora L 0-425.9 773 1315 3.42% 14.70% 81.88%-3.82 -6.8 1
2003-04-26 @ Valga W 4-025.9 1315 773 81.88% 14.70% 3.42%+3.82 +6.8 16
2003-04-26 Maardu Levadia L 0-625.5 774 1241 5.11% 15.51% 79.39%-3.27 -15.0 4
2003-04-26 @ Kuressaare W 6-025.5 1241 774 79.39% 15.51% 5.11%+3.27 +15.0 13
2003-04-26 Narva Trans D 1-153.5 1051 1087 39.00% 17.99% 43.00%-0.10 +0.4 6
2003-04-26 @ Tulevik Viljandi D 1-153.5 1087 1051 43.00% 17.99% 39.00%+0.10 -0.4 7
2003-04-26 TVMK L 0-332.2 1049 1270 17.72% 17.46% 64.83%-1.46 -26.3 4
2003-04-26 @ Levadia Tallinn W 3-032.2 1270 1049 64.83% 17.46% 17.72%+1.46 +26.4 12
2003-05-04 Kuressaare W 3-026.7 1296 759 82.91% 14.28% 2.80%+4.10 +4.2 15
2003-05-04 @ TVMK L 0-326.7 759 1296 2.80% 14.28% 82.91%-4.10 -4.2 4
2003-05-04 Maardu Levadia L 0-234.1 1051 1256 19.13% 17.54% 63.33%-1.34 -19.5 6
2003-05-04 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 2-034.1 1256 1051 63.33% 17.54% 19.13%+1.34 +19.5 16
2003-05-04 Valga W 4-028.0 1086 766 74.82% 16.47% 8.71%+2.51 +17.5 10
2003-05-04 @ Narva Trans L 0-428.0 766 1086 8.71% 16.47% 74.82%-2.51 -17.5 1
2003-05-05 Flora L 1-434.3 1022 1322 12.05% 16.96% 70.99%-2.04 -15.5 4
2003-05-05 @ Levadia Tallinn W 4-134.3 1322 1022 70.99% 16.96% 12.05%+2.04 +15.5 19
2003-05-13 Levadia Tallinn L 3-934.2 755 1007 15.29% 17.28% 67.43%-1.69 -26.9 4
2003-05-13 @ Kuressaare W 9-334.2 1007 755 67.43% 17.28% 15.29%+1.69 +26.9 7
2003-05-13 Tulevik Viljandi W 4-029.0 1300 1032 71.78% 16.88% 11.34%+2.13 +22.6 18
2003-05-13 @ TVMK L 0-429.0 1032 1300 11.34% 16.88% 71.78%-2.13 -22.6 6
2003-05-13 Valga D 0-051.6 1275 748 82.66% 14.39% 2.95%+4.03 -10.6 17
2003-05-13 @ Maardu Levadia D 0-051.6 748 1275 2.95% 14.39% 82.66%-4.03 +10.6 2
2003-05-14 Narva Trans D 2-257.9 1338 1104 69.41% 17.12% 13.47%+1.88 -4.8 20
2003-05-14 @ Flora D 2-257.9 1104 1338 13.47% 17.12% 69.41%-1.88 +4.8 11
2003-05-22 Maardu Levadia W 1-047.5 1108 1265 23.88% 17.75% 58.38%-0.99 +27.3 14
2003-05-22 @ Narva Trans L 0-147.5 1265 1108 58.38% 17.75% 23.88%+0.99 -27.3 17
2003-05-22 Levadia Tallinn W 3-144.7 1009 1034 40.60% 17.99% 41.40%-0.02 +32.9 9
2003-05-22 @ Tulevik Viljandi L 1-344.7 1034 1009 41.40% 17.99% 40.60%+0.02 -32.9 7
2003-05-22 TVMK L 0-326.8 759 1323 3.06% 14.46% 82.48%-3.98 -4.6 2
2003-05-22 @ Valga W 3-026.8 1323 759 82.48% 14.46% 3.06%+3.98 +4.6 21
2003-05-23 Kuressaare W 7-126.7 1333 728 84.56% 13.49% 1.95%+4.60 +4.6 23
2003-05-23 @ Flora L 1-726.7 728 1333 1.95% 13.49% 84.56%-4.60 -4.6 4
2003-05-30 Kuressaare D 0-050.5 754 724 48.30% 17.96% 33.74%+0.38 -1.7 3
2003-05-30 @ Valga D 0-050.5 724 754 33.74% 17.96% 48.30%-0.38 +1.7 5
2003-06-01 Flora L 0-232.0 1042 1337 12.33% 17.00% 70.68%-2.01 -12.9 9
2003-06-01 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 2-032.0 1337 1042 70.68% 17.00% 12.33%+2.01 +12.9 26
2003-06-01 Maardu Levadia W 3-035.6 1327 1238 55.76% 17.82% 26.41%+0.82 +37.7 24
2003-06-01 @ TVMK L 0-335.6 1238 1327 26.41% 17.82% 55.76%-0.82 -37.7 17
2003-06-01 Levadia Tallinn L 1-251.5 1136 1001 60.73% 17.66% 21.61%+1.15 -26.8 14
2003-06-01 @ Narva Trans W 2-151.5 1001 1136 21.61% 17.66% 60.73%-1.15 +26.8 10
2003-06-14 Tulevik Viljandi L 0-429.1 725 1029 11.82% 16.94% 71.25%-2.07 -23.5 5
2003-06-14 @ Kuressaare W 4-029.1 1029 725 71.25% 16.94% 11.82%+2.07 +23.5 12
2003-06-14 TVMK L 1-238.0 1109 1365 14.96% 17.25% 67.79%-1.72 -7.8 14
2003-06-14 @ Narva Trans W 2-138.0 1365 1109 67.79% 17.25% 14.96%+1.72 +7.8 27
2003-06-16 Flora L 1-241.3 1200 1350 24.52% 17.77% 57.71%-0.94 -12.1 17
2003-06-16 @ Maardu Levadia W 2-141.3 1350 1200 57.71% 17.77% 24.52%+0.94 +12.2 29
2003-06-18 TVMK L 0-424.9 702 1373 1.73% 13.22% 85.06%-4.77 -3.3 5
2003-06-18 @ Kuressaare W 4-024.9 1373 702 85.06% 13.22% 1.73%+4.77 +3.3 30
2003-06-20 Levadia Tallinn W 3-029.1 1362 1028 75.57% 16.34% 8.09%+2.62 +12.4 32
2003-06-20 @ Flora L 0-329.1 1028 1362 8.09% 16.34% 75.57%-2.62 -12.4 10
2003-06-21 Tulevik Viljandi L 1-449.1 1188 1053 60.74% 17.66% 21.60%+1.15 -65.6 17
2003-06-21 @ Maardu Levadia W 4-149.1 1053 1188 21.60% 17.66% 60.74%-1.15 +65.6 15
2003-07-10 Kuressaare W 3-028.0 1101 699 78.61% 15.71% 5.68%+3.12 +8.7 17
2003-07-10 @ Narva Trans L 0-328.0 699 1101 5.68% 15.71% 78.61%-3.12 -8.7 5
2003-07-10 Maardu Levadia L 2-346.2 1015 1122 29.55% 17.89% 52.56%-0.63 -13.6 10
2003-07-10 @ Levadia Tallinn W 3-246.2 1122 1015 52.56% 17.89% 29.55%+0.63 +13.6 20
2003-07-10 Valga D 3-361.7 1118 753 77.04% 16.06% 6.89%+2.84 -5.2 16
2003-07-10 @ Tulevik Viljandi D 3-361.7 753 1118 6.89% 16.06% 77.04%-2.84 +5.1 4
2003-07-11 Flora D 4-466.4 1376 1375 44.29% 17.99% 37.72%+0.17 -0.4 31
2003-07-11 @ TVMK D 4-466.4 1375 1376 37.72% 17.99% 44.29%-0.17 +0.4 33
2003-07-14 Maardu Levadia L 0-229.4 690 1136 5.69% 15.71% 78.59%-3.11 -6.0 5
2003-07-14 @ Kuressaare W 2-029.4 1136 690 78.59% 15.71% 5.69%+3.11 +6.0 23
2003-07-14 Tulevik Viljandi D 2-257.4 1110 1113 43.66% 17.99% 38.35%+0.14 -0.4 18
2003-07-14 @ Narva Trans D 2-257.4 1113 1110 38.35% 17.99% 43.66%-0.14 +0.4 17
2003-07-15 Levadia Tallinn D 0-051.3 1376 1002 77.42% 15.98% 6.59%+2.91 -9.4 32
2003-07-15 @ TVMK D 0-051.3 1002 1376 6.59% 15.98% 77.42%-2.91 +9.4 11
2003-07-20 Narva Trans L 3-454.0 1113 1110 44.64% 17.99% 37.37%+0.19 -18.7 17
2003-07-20 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 4-354.0 1110 1113 37.37% 17.99% 44.64%-0.19 +18.7 21
2003-07-20 TVMK L 1-433.4 1011 1366 9.09% 16.53% 74.37%-2.45 -11.8 11
2003-07-20 @ Levadia Tallinn W 4-133.4 1366 1011 74.37% 16.53% 9.09%+2.45 +11.8 35
2003-07-21 Kuressaare W 7-025.0 1142 684 80.60% 15.15% 4.25%+3.52 +14.4 26
2003-07-21 @ Maardu Levadia L 0-725.0 684 1142 4.25% 15.15% 80.60%-3.52 -14.4 5
2003-07-24 Valga W 2-137.0 999 758 69.95% 17.07% 12.98%+1.93 +6.8 14
2003-07-24 @ Levadia Tallinn L 1-237.0 758 999 12.98% 17.07% 69.95%-1.93 -6.8 4
2003-07-28 Narva Trans L 1-333.1 669 1128 5.32% 15.58% 79.10%-3.21 -4.9 5
2003-07-28 @ Kuressaare W 3-133.1 1128 669 79.10% 15.58% 5.32%+3.21 +4.9 24
2003-07-28 Tulevik Viljandi D 0-051.0 751 1095 9.65% 16.63% 73.72%-2.36 +8.4 5
2003-07-28 @ Valga D 0-051.0 1095 751 73.72% 16.63% 9.65%+2.36 -8.4 18
2003-07-29 TVMK W 2-042.6 1375 1378 43.67% 17.99% 38.34%+0.14 +35.6 36
2003-07-29 @ Flora L 0-242.6 1378 1375 38.34% 17.99% 43.67%-0.14 -35.6 35
2003-07-31 Levadia Tallinn W 4-031.8 1156 1006 62.25% 17.59% 20.16%+1.26 +38.7 29
2003-07-31 @ Maardu Levadia L 0-431.8 1006 1156 20.16% 17.59% 62.25%-1.26 -38.7 14
2003-08-04 Kuressaare W 5-023.9 1343 665 86.08% 12.61% 1.32%+5.14 +3.1 38
2003-08-04 @ TVMK L 0-523.9 665 1343 1.32% 12.61% 86.08%-5.14 -3.1 5
2003-08-04 Maardu Levadia L 0-138.8 1086 1195 29.37% 17.89% 52.74%-0.64 -15.1 18
2003-08-04 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 1-038.8 1195 1086 52.74% 17.89% 29.37%+0.64 +15.1 32
2003-08-04 Valga W 3-028.3 1133 759 77.40% 15.99% 6.61%+2.90 +10.2 27
2003-08-04 @ Narva Trans L 0-328.3 759 1133 6.61% 15.99% 77.40%-2.90 -10.2 5
2003-08-05 Flora L 1-333.5 967 1411 5.76% 15.74% 78.50%-3.10 -5.3 14
2003-08-05 @ Levadia Tallinn W 3-133.5 1411 967 78.50% 15.74% 5.76%+3.10 +5.3 39
2003-08-09 Kuressaare W 5-026.0 1071 661 78.89% 15.64% 5.47%+3.17 +13.5 21
2003-08-09 @ Tulevik Viljandi L 0-526.0 661 1071 5.47% 15.64% 78.89%-3.17 -13.5 5
2003-08-09 Levadia Tallinn W 4-150.0 749 962 18.42% 17.50% 64.08%-1.40 +69.1 8
2003-08-09 @ Valga L 1-450.0 962 749 64.08% 17.50% 18.42%+1.40 -69.1 14
2003-08-09 Narva Trans W 4-345.5 1346 1143 66.96% 17.32% 15.73%+1.64 +7.5 41
2003-08-09 @ TVMK L 3-445.5 1143 1346 15.73% 17.32% 66.96%-1.64 -7.5 27
2003-08-10 Maardu Levadia W 1-035.5 1416 1210 67.27% 17.29% 15.43%+1.67 +8.5 42
2003-08-10 @ Flora L 0-135.5 1210 1416 15.43% 17.29% 67.27%-1.67 -8.5 32
2003-08-13 Narva Trans D 2-257.7 818 1136 11.03% 16.83% 72.14%-2.17 +5.3 9
2003-08-13 @ Valga D 2-257.7 1136 818 72.14% 16.83% 11.03%+2.17 -5.3 28
2003-08-17 Tulevik Viljandi W 2-135.7 1425 1085 75.82% 16.30% 7.88%+2.65 +4.2 45
2003-08-17 @ Flora L 1-235.7 1085 1425 7.88% 16.30% 75.82%-2.65 -4.2 21
2003-08-18 Levadia Tallinn W 3-135.9 1131 893 69.68% 17.09% 13.22%+1.90 +12.0 31
2003-08-18 @ Narva Trans L 1-335.9 893 1131 13.22% 17.09% 69.68%-1.90 -12.0 14
2003-08-18 TVMK L 1-438.8 1201 1353 24.37% 17.76% 57.87%-0.95 -29.6 32
2003-08-18 @ Maardu Levadia W 4-138.8 1353 1201 57.87% 17.76% 24.37%+0.95 +29.6 44
2003-08-18 Valga L 0-136.4 648 824 21.88% 17.67% 60.45%-1.13 -11.6 5
2003-08-18 @ Kuressaare W 1-036.4 824 648 60.45% 17.67% 21.88%+1.13 +11.6 12
2003-08-23 Narva Trans W 5-348.9 1172 1142 48.13% 17.96% 33.91%+0.37 +23.5 35
2003-08-23 @ Maardu Levadia L 3-548.9 1142 1172 33.91% 17.96% 48.13%-0.37 -23.5 31
2003-08-23 Valga W 3-131.9 1383 835 83.20% 14.16% 2.65%+4.18 +2.4 47
2003-08-23 @ TVMK L 1-331.9 835 1383 2.65% 14.16% 83.20%-4.18 -2.4 12
2003-08-24 Flora L 0-623.1 636 1429 0.90% 11.75% 87.36%-5.66 -2.4 5
2003-08-24 @ Kuressaare W 6-023.1 1429 636 87.36% 11.75% 0.90%+5.66 +2.4 48
2003-08-24 Tulevik Viljandi W 4-254.7 881 1081 19.58% 17.56% 62.86%-1.31 +42.9 17
2003-08-24 @ Levadia Tallinn L 2-454.7 1081 881 62.86% 17.56% 19.58%+1.31 -42.9 21
2003-08-31 Flora L 1-335.9 1119 1431 11.32% 16.87% 71.80%-2.13 -10.3 31
2003-08-31 @ Narva Trans W 3-135.9 1431 1119 71.80% 16.87% 11.32%+2.13 +10.3 51
2003-09-01 Kuressaare W 4-238.6 924 634 73.12% 16.71% 10.17%+2.29 +8.3 20
2003-09-01 @ Levadia Tallinn L 2-438.6 634 924 10.17% 16.71% 73.12%-2.29 -8.3 5
2003-09-01 Maardu Levadia L 0-329.1 833 1195 8.77% 16.48% 74.75%-2.50 -13.5 12
2003-09-01 @ Valga W 3-029.1 1195 833 74.75% 16.48% 8.77%+2.50 +13.5 38
2003-09-01 TVMK L 1-334.9 1038 1385 9.47% 16.60% 73.93%-2.39 -8.7 21
2003-09-01 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 3-134.9 1385 1038 73.93% 16.60% 9.47%+2.39 +8.7 50
2003-09-13 Narva Trans L 0-133.4 819 1109 12.71% 17.04% 70.25%-1.96 -7.0 12
2003-09-13 @ Valga W 1-033.4 1109 819 70.25% 17.04% 12.71%+1.96 +7.0 34
2003-09-13 Tulevik Viljandi W 3-032.1 1209 1029 65.02% 17.44% 17.53%+1.48 +26.1 41
2003-09-13 @ Maardu Levadia L 0-332.1 1029 1209 17.53% 17.44% 65.02%-1.48 -26.1 21
2003-09-13 TVMK L 0-226.9 626 1394 1.02% 12.04% 86.94%-5.48 -1.0 5
2003-09-13 @ Kuressaare W 2-026.9 1394 626 86.94% 12.04% 1.02%+5.48 +1.0 53
2003-09-14 Levadia Tallinn W 4-131.0 1441 932 82.17% 14.59% 3.24%+3.90 +4.1 54
2003-09-14 @ Flora L 1-431.0 932 1441 3.24% 14.59% 82.17%-3.90 -4.1 20
2003-09-19 Levadia Tallinn W 6-128.8 1395 928 80.89% 15.05% 4.06%+3.59 +8.2 56
2003-09-19 @ TVMK L 1-628.8 928 1395 4.06% 15.05% 80.89%-3.59 -8.3 20
2003-09-20 Tulevik Viljandi W 3-244.4 1116 1003 58.36% 17.75% 23.90%+0.99 +11.3 37
2003-09-20 @ Narva Trans L 2-344.4 1003 1116 23.90% 17.75% 58.36%-0.99 -11.3 21
2003-09-20 Valga W 5-024.2 1446 812 85.18% 13.15% 1.67%+4.81 +4.0 57
2003-09-20 @ Flora L 0-524.2 812 1446 1.67% 13.15% 85.18%-4.81 -4.0 12
2003-09-24 Flora L 1-726.8 808 1450 2.02% 13.57% 84.40%-4.55 -4.7 12
2003-09-24 @ Valga W 7-126.8 1450 808 84.40% 13.57% 2.02%+4.55 +4.7 60
2003-09-24 Kuressaare W 3-134.8 920 625 73.43% 16.67% 9.90%+2.33 +9.1 23
2003-09-24 @ Levadia Tallinn L 1-334.8 625 920 9.90% 16.67% 73.43%-2.33 -9.0 5
2003-09-28 Flora L 0-526.2 992 1454 5.22% 15.55% 79.24%-3.24 -12.9 21
2003-09-28 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 5-026.2 1454 992 79.24% 15.55% 5.22%+3.24 +12.9 63
2003-09-28 Kuressaare W 4-135.8 804 615 65.77% 17.40% 16.83%+1.54 +21.2 15
2003-09-28 @ Valga L 1-435.8 615 804 16.83% 17.40% 65.77%-1.54 -21.2 5
2003-09-28 Maardu Levadia W 2-035.0 1403 1235 63.98% 17.50% 18.52%+1.39 +18.9 59
2003-09-28 @ TVMK L 0-235.0 1235 1403 18.52% 17.50% 63.98%-1.39 -18.9 41
2003-09-28 Narva Trans L 0-135.7 929 1127 19.73% 17.57% 62.70%-1.30 -10.6 23
2003-09-28 @ Levadia Tallinn W 1-035.7 1127 929 62.70% 17.57% 19.73%+1.30 +10.6 40
2003-10-04 Tulevik Viljandi L 0-328.8 594 979 7.83% 16.29% 75.89%-2.66 -12.0 5
2003-10-04 @ Kuressaare W 3-028.8 979 594 75.89% 16.29% 7.83%+2.66 +12.0 24
2003-10-04 TVMK W 2-049.8 1138 1422 13.01% 17.07% 69.92%-1.93 +61.7 43
2003-10-04 @ Narva Trans L 0-249.8 1422 1138 69.92% 17.07% 13.01%+1.93 -61.7 59
2003-10-04 Valga D 0-050.6 918 825 56.15% 17.81% 26.03%+0.84 -3.7 24
2003-10-04 @ Levadia Tallinn D 0-050.6 825 918 26.03% 17.81% 56.15%-0.84 +3.7 16
2003-10-05 Flora L 1-338.3 1216 1467 15.32% 17.28% 67.40%-1.68 -13.7 41
2003-10-05 @ Maardu Levadia W 3-138.3 1467 1216 67.40% 17.28% 15.32%+1.68 +13.7 66
2003-10-17 Narva Trans W 2-032.9 1481 1199 72.62% 16.78% 10.60%+2.23 +11.2 69
2003-10-17 @ Flora L 0-232.9 1199 1481 10.60% 16.78% 72.62%-2.23 -11.2 43
2003-10-18 Levadia Tallinn L 0-527.8 582 914 10.23% 16.72% 73.05%-2.28 -25.2 5
2003-10-18 @ Kuressaare W 5-027.8 914 582 73.05% 16.72% 10.23%+2.28 +25.2 27
2003-10-18 Tulevik Viljandi W 8-128.3 1360 991 77.21% 16.03% 6.76%+2.87 +19.0 62
2003-10-18 @ TVMK L 1-828.3 991 1360 6.76% 16.03% 77.21%-2.87 -19.0 24
2003-10-18 Valga D 0-051.2 1202 829 77.40% 15.99% 6.61%+2.90 -9.4 42
2003-10-18 @ Maardu Levadia D 0-051.2 829 1202 6.61% 15.99% 77.40%-2.90 +9.4 17
2003-10-21 Flora D 0-052.5 1188 1492 11.80% 16.93% 71.27%-2.07 +7.7 44
2003-10-21 @ Narva Trans D 0-052.5 1492 1188 71.27% 16.93% 11.80%+2.07 -7.7 70
2003-10-22 Kuressaare W 2-027.4 1193 557 85.24% 13.11% 1.65%+4.83 +1.7 45
2003-10-22 @ Maardu Levadia L 0-227.4 557 1193 1.65% 13.11% 85.24%-4.83 -1.7 5
2003-10-26 Kuressaare W 17-022.9 1484 555 90.06% 9.60% 0.34%+6.98 +2.4 73
2003-10-26 @ Flora L 0-1722.9 555 1484 0.34% 9.60% 90.06%-6.98 -2.4 5
2003-10-26 Maardu Levadia L 1-543.0 1196 1195 44.27% 17.99% 37.75%+0.17 -63.4 44
2003-10-26 @ Narva Trans W 5-143.0 1195 1196 37.75% 17.99% 44.27%-0.17 +63.4 48
2003-10-26 Levadia Tallinn W 2-038.4 972 940 48.51% 17.95% 33.53%+0.40 +31.8 27
2003-10-26 @ Tulevik Viljandi L 0-238.4 940 972 33.53% 17.95% 48.51%-0.40 -31.8 27
2003-10-26 TVMK L 1-332.3 838 1379 3.44% 14.71% 81.84%-3.81 -3.1 17
2003-10-26 @ Valga W 3-132.3 1379 838 81.84% 14.71% 3.44%+3.81 +3.1 65
2003-11-02 Flora L 1-346.6 1382 1487 29.87% 17.90% 52.23%-0.61 -25.0 65
2003-11-02 @ TVMK W 3-146.6 1487 1382 52.23% 17.90% 29.87%+0.61 +25.0 76
2003-11-02 Kuressaare W 8-024.0 1132 553 83.98% 13.78% 2.23%+4.41 +8.4 47
2003-11-02 @ Narva Trans L 0-824.0 553 1132 2.23% 13.78% 83.98%-4.41 -8.4 5
2003-11-02 Maardu Levadia D 1-154.0 908 1258 9.34% 16.58% 74.08%-2.41 +7.6 28
2003-11-02 @ Levadia Tallinn D 1-154.0 1258 908 74.08% 16.58% 9.34%+2.41 -7.6 49
2003-11-02 Valga W 3-137.6 1004 835 64.04% 17.50% 18.46%+1.40 +16.3 30
2003-11-02 @ Tulevik Viljandi L 1-337.6 835 1004 18.46% 17.50% 64.04%-1.40 -16.3 17

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 2003-10-04 13.01% @ Narva Trans 1138 2 TVMK 1422 0
2 2003-08-09 18.42% @ Valga 749 4 Levadia Tallinn 962 1
3 2003-08-24 19.58% @ Levadia Tallinn 881 4 Tulevik Viljandi 1081 2
4 2003-06-21 21.60% Tulevik Viljandi 1053 4 @ Maardu Levadia 1188 1
5 2003-06-01 21.61% Levadia Tallinn 1001 2 @ Narva Trans 1136 1
6 2003-05-22 23.88% @ Narva Trans 1108 1 Maardu Levadia 1265 0
7 2003-07-20 37.37% Narva Trans 1110 4 @ Tulevik Viljandi 1113 3
8 2003-04-20 37.60% Narva Trans 1066 2 @ Levadia Tallinn 1069 1
9 2003-10-26 37.75% Maardu Levadia 1195 5 @ Narva Trans 1196 1
10 2003-04-19 38.74% @ Kuressaare 755 2 Valga 792 1
11 2003-03-20 39.80% @ Levadia Tallinn 1056 2 Tulevik Viljandi 1086 1
12 2003-05-22 40.60% @ Tulevik Viljandi 1009 3 Levadia Tallinn 1034 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 2003-08-09 69.15 @ Valga 4 749 18.42% Levadia Tallinn 1 962 64.08% 17.50%
2 2003-06-21 65.59 Tulevik Viljandi 4 1053 21.60% @ Maardu Levadia 1 1188 60.74% 17.66%
3 2003-10-26 63.43 Maardu Levadia 5 1195 37.75% @ Narva Trans 1 1196 44.27% 17.99%
4 2003-10-04 61.67 @ Narva Trans 2 1138 13.01% TVMK 0 1422 69.92% 17.07%
5 2003-04-15 44.94 @ TVMK 4 1225 58.44% Narva Trans 0 1111 23.82% 17.74%
6 2003-08-24 42.91 @ Levadia Tallinn 4 881 19.58% Tulevik Viljandi 2 1081 62.86% 17.56%
7 2003-07-31 38.71 @ Maardu Levadia 4 1156 62.25% Levadia Tallinn 0 1006 20.16% 17.59%
8 2003-06-01 37.68 @ TVMK 3 1327 55.76% Maardu Levadia 0 1238 26.41% 17.82%
9 2003-04-16 36.36 @ Flora 2 1267 42.68% Maardu Levadia 0 1277 39.32% 17.99%
10 2003-07-29 35.61 @ Flora 2 1375 43.67% TVMK 0 1378 38.34% 17.99%
11 2003-05-22 32.85 @ Tulevik Viljandi 3 1009 40.60% Levadia Tallinn 1 1034 41.40% 17.99%
12 2003-10-26 31.84 @ Tulevik Viljandi 2 972 48.51% Levadia Tallinn 0 940 33.53% 17.95%
13 2003-08-18 29.61 TVMK 4 1353 57.87% @ Maardu Levadia 1 1201 24.37% 17.76%
14 2003-05-22 27.33 @ Narva Trans 1 1108 23.88% Maardu Levadia 0 1265 58.38% 17.75%
15 2003-05-13 26.93 Levadia Tallinn 9 1007 67.43% @ Kuressaare 3 755 15.29% 17.28%
16 2003-06-01 26.77 Levadia Tallinn 2 1001 21.61% @ Narva Trans 1 1136 60.73% 17.66%
17 2003-04-26 26.35 TVMK 3 1270 64.83% @ Levadia Tallinn 0 1049 17.72% 17.46%
18 2003-09-13 26.09 @ Maardu Levadia 3 1209 65.02% Tulevik Viljandi 0 1029 17.53% 17.44%
19 2003-10-18 25.24 Levadia Tallinn 5 914 73.05% @ Kuressaare 0 582 10.23% 16.72%
20 2003-11-02 24.99 Flora 3 1487 52.23% @ TVMK 1 1382 29.87% 17.90%
21 2003-06-14 23.53 Tulevik Viljandi 4 1029 71.25% @ Kuressaare 0 725 11.82% 16.94%
22 2003-08-23 23.52 @ Maardu Levadia 5 1172 48.13% Narva Trans 3 1142 33.91% 17.96%
23 2003-05-13 22.62 @ TVMK 4 1300 71.78% Tulevik Viljandi 0 1032 11.34% 16.88%
24 2003-09-28 21.19 @ Valga 4 804 65.77% Kuressaare 1 615 16.83% 17.40%
25 2003-04-20 20.12 Narva Trans 2 1066 37.60% @ Levadia Tallinn 1 1069 44.41% 17.99%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 2003-07-11 66.4 @ TVMK 4 1376 44.29% Flora 4 1375 37.72% 17.99%
2 2003-07-10 61.7 @ Tulevik Viljandi 3 1118 77.04% Valga 3 753 6.89% 16.06%
3 2003-05-14 57.9 @ Flora 2 1338 69.41% Narva Trans 2 1104 13.47% 17.12%
4 2003-03-14 57.8 @ Flora 2 1260 49.38% TVMK 2 1221 32.68% 17.94%
5 2003-08-13 57.7 @ Valga 2 818 11.03% Narva Trans 2 1136 72.14% 16.83%
6 2003-07-14 57.4 @ Narva Trans 2 1110 43.66% Tulevik Viljandi 2 1113 38.35% 17.99%
7 2003-08-24 54.7 @ Levadia Tallinn 4 881 19.58% Tulevik Viljandi 2 1081 62.86% 17.56%
8 2003-04-20 54.0 @ Maardu Levadia 1 1241 39.95% TVMK 1 1270 42.05% 17.99%
9 2003-07-20 54.0 Narva Trans 4 1110 37.37% @ Tulevik Viljandi 3 1113 44.64% 17.99%
10 2003-11-02 54.0 @ Levadia Tallinn 1 908 9.34% Maardu Levadia 1 1258 74.08% 16.58%
11 2003-04-15 53.8 @ Valga 1 786 12.67% Levadia Tallinn 1 1075 70.29% 17.03%
12 2003-04-26 53.5 @ Tulevik Viljandi 1 1051 39.00% Narva Trans 1 1087 43.00% 17.99%
13 2003-10-21 52.5 @ Narva Trans 0 1188 11.80% Flora 0 1492 71.27% 16.93%
14 2003-05-13 51.6 @ Maardu Levadia 0 1275 82.66% Valga 0 748 2.95% 14.39%
15 2003-06-01 51.5 Levadia Tallinn 2 1001 21.61% @ Narva Trans 1 1136 60.73% 17.66%
16 2003-07-15 51.3 @ TVMK 0 1376 77.42% Levadia Tallinn 0 1002 6.59% 15.98%
17 2003-10-18 51.2 @ Maardu Levadia 0 1202 77.40% Valga 0 829 6.61% 15.99%
18 2003-04-14 51.0 @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 1071 75.09% Kuressaare 0 746 8.48% 16.42%
19 2003-07-28 51.0 @ Valga 0 751 9.65% Tulevik Viljandi 0 1095 73.72% 16.63%
20 2003-04-05 50.7 @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 1067 23.25% TVMK 0 1229 59.03% 17.72%
21 2003-10-04 50.6 @ Levadia Tallinn 0 918 56.15% Valga 0 825 26.03% 17.81%
22 2003-05-30 50.5 @ Valga 0 754 48.30% Kuressaare 0 724 33.74% 17.96%
23 2003-08-09 50.0 @ Valga 4 749 18.42% Levadia Tallinn 1 962 64.08% 17.50%
24 2003-10-04 49.8 @ Narva Trans 2 1138 13.01% TVMK 0 1422 69.92% 17.07%
25 2003-06-21 49.1 Tulevik Viljandi 4 1053 21.60% @ Maardu Levadia 1 1188 60.74% 17.66%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 2003-10-26 22.9 @ Flora 17 1484 90.06% Kuressaare 0 555 0.34% 9.60%
2 2003-08-24 23.1 Flora 6 1429 87.36% @ Kuressaare 0 636 0.90% 11.75%
3 2003-08-04 23.9 @ TVMK 5 1343 86.08% Kuressaare 0 665 1.32% 12.61%
4 2003-11-02 24.0 @ Narva Trans 8 1132 83.98% Kuressaare 0 553 2.23% 13.78%
5 2003-09-20 24.2 @ Flora 5 1446 85.18% Valga 0 812 1.67% 13.15%
6 2003-06-18 24.9 TVMK 4 1373 85.06% @ Kuressaare 0 702 1.73% 13.22%
7 2003-07-21 25.0 @ Maardu Levadia 7 1142 80.60% Kuressaare 0 684 4.25% 15.15%
8 2003-04-26 25.5 Maardu Levadia 6 1241 79.39% @ Kuressaare 0 774 5.11% 15.51%
9 2003-04-26 25.9 Flora 4 1315 81.88% @ Valga 0 773 3.42% 14.70%
10 2003-08-09 26.0 @ Tulevik Viljandi 5 1071 78.89% Kuressaare 0 661 5.47% 15.64%
11 2003-03-19 26.2 Flora 4 1259 80.70% @ Kuressaare 0 754 4.18% 15.11%
12 2003-09-28 26.2 Flora 5 1454 79.24% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 992 5.22% 15.55%
13 2003-05-04 26.7 @ TVMK 3 1296 82.91% Kuressaare 0 759 2.80% 14.28%
14 2003-05-23 26.7 @ Flora 7 1333 84.56% Kuressaare 1 728 1.95% 13.49%
15 2003-05-22 26.8 TVMK 3 1323 82.48% @ Valga 0 759 3.06% 14.46%
16 2003-09-24 26.8 Flora 7 1450 84.40% @ Valga 1 808 2.02% 13.57%
17 2003-09-13 26.9 TVMK 2 1394 86.94% @ Kuressaare 0 626 1.02% 12.04%
18 2003-10-22 27.4 @ Maardu Levadia 2 1193 85.24% Kuressaare 0 557 1.65% 13.11%
19 2003-04-05 27.7 Maardu Levadia 3 1270 79.75% @ Valga 0 793 4.85% 15.41%
20 2003-10-18 27.8 Levadia Tallinn 5 914 73.05% @ Kuressaare 0 582 10.23% 16.72%
21 2003-05-04 28.0 @ Narva Trans 4 1086 74.82% Valga 0 766 8.71% 16.47%
22 2003-07-10 28.0 @ Narva Trans 3 1101 78.61% Kuressaare 0 699 5.68% 15.71%
23 2003-08-04 28.3 @ Narva Trans 3 1133 77.40% Valga 0 759 6.61% 15.99%
24 2003-10-18 28.3 @ TVMK 8 1360 77.21% Tulevik Viljandi 1 991 6.76% 16.03%
25 2003-09-19 28.8 @ TVMK 6 1395 80.89% Levadia Tallinn 1 928 4.06% 15.05%