‹ ›

1932 Mestaruussarja Season

56 games

Final

Champion

HPS Helsinki

20 points · 6th Title

Last Title: 1929

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

VPS

5.47 points above expected

19 points · 13.53 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Helsingfors

3.66 points below expected

17 points · 20.66 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 HPS Helsinki Champion 14 8 4 2 20 49 26 +23 18.39 +1.61
2 VPS 14 8 3 3 19 51 35 +16 13.53 +5.47
3 Helsingfors 14 7 3 4 17 44 26 +18 20.66 -3.66
4 TPS Turku 14 6 3 5 15 37 29 +8 14.01 +0.99
5 Sudet 14 6 1 7 13 32 36 -4 10.38 +2.62
6 Turku 14 5 0 9 10 20 45 -25 10.55 -0.55
7 Toverit Helsinki 14 4 1 9 9 27 44 -17 11.94 -2.94
8 Kiffen 08 14 4 1 9 9 22 41 -19 12.54 -3.54

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 VPS 19 13.53 +5.47
2 Sudet 13 10.38 +2.62
3 HPS Helsinki 20 18.39 +1.61
4 TPS Turku 15 14.01 +0.99
5 Turku 10 10.55 -0.55

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Helsingfors 17 20.66 -3.66
2 Kiffen 08 9 12.54 -3.54
3 Toverit Helsinki 9 11.94 -2.94
4 Turku 10 10.55 -0.55
5 TPS Turku 15 14.01 +0.99

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Turku 2 Sep 11 – Oct 2 1 in 39
2 VPS 2 Jun 5 – Jun 12 1 in 25
3 TPS Turku 3 Aug 7 – Aug 14 1 in 15
4 Sudet 2 May 29 – Jun 5 1 in 9
5 Toverit Helsinki 2 Jun 26 – Aug 10 1 in 9

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Helsingfors 3 Jun 1 – Jul 31 1 in 1,388
2 Kiffen 08 7 Aug 10 – Oct 2 1 in 155
3 Turku 4 May 22 – Jun 5 1 in 21
4 Toverit Helsinki 3 May 25 – Jun 2 1 in 3
5 Sudet 3 Aug 28 – Sep 18 1 in 2

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 VPS 6 Aug 21 – Oct 2 1 in 46
2 HPS Helsinki 8 May 5 – Aug 7 1 in 12
3 Turku 2 Sep 11 – Oct 2 1 in 8
4 TPS Turku 4 Aug 7 – Aug 21 1 in 7
5 Sudet 3 May 29 – Jun 12 1 in 6

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Helsingfors 4 May 29 – Jul 31 1 in 141
2 Kiffen 08 7 Aug 10 – Oct 2 1 in 20
3 Toverit Helsinki 4 Aug 14 – Sep 11 1 in 7
4 Turku 4 May 22 – Jun 5 1 in 6
5 TPS Turku 4 May 29 – Jun 17 1 in 3

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
HPS Helsinki 1076 20 -3 7 7.3 -0.3
VPS 970 19 +75 9 5.5 +3.5
Helsingfors 1133 17 +5 7 7.3 -0.3
TPS Turku 953 15 +10 5 5.3 -0.3
Sudet 808 13 +5 4 3.1 +0.9
Turku 803 10 +10 6 4.4 +1.6
Toverit Helsinki 842 9 -14 3 4.2 -1.2
Kiffen 08 809 9 -77 0 3.0 -3.0

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team HH HEL K0 SUD TT TH TUR VPS
HPS Helsinki —
0-1-1
2.47
1-1-0
3.97
2-0-0
4.37
2-0-0
3.64
1-1-0
4.18
1-0-1
4.24
1-1-0
3.89
Helsingfors
1-1-0
3.23
—
1-0-1
4.35
1-0-1
4.74
1-1-0
4.14
2-0-0
4.40
1-0-1
4.53
0-1-1
4.21
Kiffen 08
0-1-1
1.74
1-0-1
1.37
—
1-0-1
3.18
1-0-1
2.60
0-0-2
3.02
1-0-1
3.38
0-0-2
2.73
Sudet
0-0-2
1.35
1-0-1
0.99
1-0-1
2.52
—
0-1-1
2.18
1-0-1
2.41
2-0-0
2.80
1-0-1
2.19
TPS Turku
0-0-2
2.07
0-1-1
1.57
1-0-1
3.10
1-1-0
3.53
—
2-0-0
3.18
2-0-0
3.38
0-1-1
3.11
Toverit Helsinki
0-1-1
1.53
0-0-2
1.32
2-0-0
2.68
1-0-1
3.29
0-0-2
2.52
—
0-0-2
3.19
1-0-1
2.39
Turku
1-0-1
1.49
1-0-1
1.20
1-0-1
2.32
0-0-2
2.90
0-0-2
2.32
2-0-0
2.51
—
0-0-2
2.30
VPS
0-1-1
1.82
1-1-0
1.50
2-0-0
2.97
1-0-1
3.51
1-1-0
2.59
1-0-1
3.31
2-0-0
3.40
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.94 +3.6
Allowed 0.72 -4.9
Differential 0.94 +2.3

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—0.89%2.68%2.68%5.36%5.36%16.96%
10.89%3.57%3.57%3.57%1.79%5.36%18.75%
22.68%3.57%3.57%4.46%2.68%2.68%19.64%
32.68%3.57%4.46%5.36%0.89%0.89%17.86%
45.36%1.79%2.68%0.89%1.79%—12.50%
5+5.36%5.36%2.68%0.89%——14.29%
Total16.96%18.75%19.64%17.86%12.50%14.29%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.52 2.52 +0.00
SD 2.07 2.07 3.56
CV 0.82 0.82 —
Max 9 9 +9
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 56

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—————7.14%7.14%
1—7.14%—7.14%——14.29%
2——7.14%———7.14%
37.14%—7.14%7.14%——21.43%
47.14%7.14%7.14%—7.14%—28.57%
5+—21.43%————21.43%
Total14.29%35.71%21.43%14.29%7.14%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.50 1.86 +1.64
SD 2.28 1.46 3.23
CV 0.65 0.79 —
Max 9 5 +8
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
1——14.29%—7.14%—21.43%
2——7.14%7.14%——14.29%
3—14.29%—7.14%——21.43%
47.14%—7.14%—7.14%—21.43%
5+14.29%—7.14%———21.43%
Total21.43%14.29%35.71%14.29%14.29%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.14 1.86 +1.29
SD 1.61 1.35 2.52
CV 0.51 0.73 —
Max 6 4 +5
Min 1 0 -3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——7.14%—21.43%7.14%35.71%
1——7.14%———7.14%
27.14%14.29%7.14%7.14%7.14%—42.86%
3————7.14%—7.14%
4———————
5+—7.14%————7.14%
Total7.14%21.43%21.43%7.14%35.71%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.57 2.93 -1.36
SD 1.65 2.23 3.34
CV 1.05 0.76 —
Max 6 9 +5
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———14.29%7.14%—21.43%
17.14%7.14%—7.14%—7.14%28.57%
2—7.14%—7.14%—7.14%21.43%
3———————
47.14%—————7.14%
5+—7.14%7.14%7.14%——21.43%
Total14.29%21.43%7.14%35.71%7.14%14.29%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.29 2.57 -0.29
SD 2.37 1.91 3.43
CV 1.04 0.74 —
Max 8 6 +6
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—————14.29%14.29%
1—7.14%7.14%——7.14%21.43%
2——7.14%—7.14%—14.29%
314.29%——7.14%——21.43%
47.14%—7.14%———14.29%
5+14.29%—————14.29%
Total35.71%7.14%21.43%7.14%7.14%21.43%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.64 2.07 +0.57
SD 2.17 2.02 3.86
CV 0.82 0.97 —
Max 8 5 +8
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———7.14%——7.14%
1—7.14%—14.29%7.14%14.29%42.86%
27.14%——7.14%7.14%7.14%28.57%
3——7.14%———7.14%
47.14%—————7.14%
5+——7.14%———7.14%
Total14.29%7.14%14.29%28.57%14.29%21.43%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.93 3.14 -1.21
SD 1.54 2.21 3.14
CV 0.80 0.70 —
Max 6 8 +4
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.14%14.29%—7.14%14.29%42.86%
1—————7.14%7.14%
2—7.14%—7.14%—7.14%21.43%
3—14.29%7.14%———21.43%
4—7.14%————7.14%
5+———————
Total—35.71%21.43%7.14%7.14%28.57%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.43 3.21 -1.79
SD 1.45 2.58 3.40
CV 1.02 0.80 —
Max 4 8 +3
Min 0 1 -8

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0————7.14%—7.14%
1—————7.14%7.14%
27.14%—————7.14%
3——14.29%21.43%—7.14%42.86%
47.14%——7.14%——14.29%
5+14.29%7.14%————21.43%
Total28.57%7.14%14.29%28.57%7.14%14.29%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.64 2.50 +1.14
SD 2.41 2.47 4.33
CV 0.66 0.99 —
Max 9 9 +9
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 14

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Helsingfors 1133 17 20.66 -3.66 14.0% 14 16 19 21 23 25 28
HPS Helsinki 1076 20 18.39 +1.61 78.0% 11 13 16 18 20 23 25
VPS 970 19 13.53 +5.47 98.0% 6 9 11 14 16 18 20
TPS Turku 953 15 14.01 +0.99 68.0% 6 9 12 14 16 20 22
Toverit Helsinki 842 9 11.94 -2.94 19.0% 3 7 10 12 14 16 21
Kiffen 08 809 9 12.54 -3.54 16.0% 7 8 11 13 15 17 18
Sudet 808 13 10.38 +2.62 87.0% 4 5 8 10 12 16 19
Turku 803 10 10.55 -0.55 55.0% 5 7 9 10 12 15 17

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 9.5% * Slight Edge: 9.5% to 15.5% * Clear Edge: 15.5% to 20% * Strong Edge: 20% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+32.14%
Strong Edge
58.93%14.29%26.79%
Elo Value
Home Edge
124 Elo
0.008 goals per Elo point
0115.78400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+1.25 goals
Strong Home
-2+0.93+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 5 * Wide Open: 5 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 4th * Longshot: 5th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.06 * Tight Race: 0.06 to 0.11 * Comfortable: 0.11 to 0.21 * Runaway: 0.21 and up.
Title-Race Openness
2.2
One-Team Race
13458
Champion Preseason Odds
32%
HPS Helsinki, 2nd of 8
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.07/gm
Tight Race
00.230.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.37 * Some Luck: 2.37 to 3.56 * Lucky: 3.56 to 4.74 * Wild Swing: 4.74 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1 * Close: 1 to 1.51 * Off: 1.51 to 2.01 * Way Off: 2.01 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 8 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 8 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 8 * As Expected: 8 to 12.8 * Several Outliers: 12.8 to 17.6 * Many Outliers: 17.6 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
3.07 points
Some Luck
02.967
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.75
Off
01.253
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 93.75%
98.00%
VPS
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
14.00%
Helsingfors
06.25%50
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 8
Minimal Outliers
00.88

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.15 * Even: 0.15 to 0.17 * Top-Heavy: 0.17 to 0.2 * Lopsided: 0.2 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.4 * Moderate Separation: 1.4 to 1.7 * Strong Separation: 1.7 to 1.9 * Wide Separation: 1.9 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 62.5% * Slight Edge: 62.5% to 70% * Clear Edge: 70% to 73.5% * Wide Edge: 73.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82.5% * Clear Edge: 82.5% to 90% * Strong Edge: 90% to 93% * Dominant: 93% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 51.5% * Some Drama: 51.5% to 57.5% * Frequent: 57.5% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16.5% * Occasional: 16.5% to 21.5% * Frequent: 21.5% to 26.5% * Very Frequent: 26.5% and up.
Gini Index
0.17
Even
00.150.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 129.56
1.28
Coin-Flip Parity
0.951.41.71.92.5
Interquartile Edge
75%
Wide Edge
50%62.5%70%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
87%
Clear Edge
50%91%100%
Close Games
Expected
34%
Few
0%32%100%
Blowouts
Expected
46%
Very Frequent
0%48%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.33 * Slight Separation: 0.33 to 0.37 * Notable Separation: 0.37 to 0.41 * Lopsided: 0.41 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.21 * Some Carryover: 0.21 to 0.46 * Strong Carryover: 0.46 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23% * As Expected: 23% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 28% * Very Upset-Prone: 28% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19.5% * As Expected: 19.5% to 21.5% * Shaky Favorites: 21.5% to 25.5% * Very Shaky: 25.5% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.52
Highly Predictable
00.502
Matchup Imbalance
0.51
Lopsided
00.330.410.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.09
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.66
Near-Lock
00.210.460.591
Upset Rate
Expected
23%
As Expected
0%21%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
23%
Shaky Favorites
0%18%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.18 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.18 to 0.27 * Above Noise: 0.27 to 0.36 * Well Above Noise: 0.36 and up.
Probability calibration
0.15
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.53
Overconfident
0.3923831.001.60762
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.161
Well Within Noise
00.1790.4

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team12345678
HPS Helsinki32.00%41.00%18.00%3.00%3.00%1.00%2.00%—
VPS3.00%8.00%18.00%29.00%13.00%13.00%11.00%5.00%
Helsingfors60.00%33.00%6.00%1.00%————
TPS Turku4.00%9.00%25.00%19.00%17.00%12.00%10.00%4.00%
Sudet—1.00%4.00%12.00%15.00%15.00%27.00%26.00%
Turku—2.00%5.00%8.00%9.00%17.00%17.00%42.00%
Toverit Helsinki1.00%3.00%8.00%12.00%21.00%27.00%13.00%15.00%
Kiffen 08—3.00%16.00%16.00%22.00%15.00%20.00%8.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
Helsingfors 100% —
HPS Helsinki 98.00% 2.00%
TPS Turku 86.00% 14.00%
VPS 84.00% 16.00%
Kiffen 08 72.00% 28.00%
Toverit Helsinki 72.00% 28.00%
Sudet 47.00% 53.00%
Turku 41.00% 59.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1932-05-05 HPS Helsinki L 0-333.5 790 1051 30.77% 14.85% 54.37%-1.16 -10.6 0
1932-05-05 @ Sudet W 3-033.5 1051 790 54.37% 14.85% 30.77%+1.16 +10.6 2
1932-05-05 Helsingfors L 0-431.1 848 1139 27.14% 14.72% 58.14%-1.41 -12.3 0
1932-05-05 @ Turku W 4-031.1 1139 848 58.14% 14.72% 27.14%+1.41 +12.3 2
1932-05-08 Sudet W 6-130.5 887 780 72.97% 14.46% 12.57%+1.79 +6.2 2
1932-05-08 @ Kiffen 08 L 1-630.5 780 887 12.57% 14.46% 72.97%-1.79 -6.2 0
1932-05-08 Toverit Helsinki W 4-239.6 914 876 67.60% 14.82% 17.59%+1.24 +3.4 2
1932-05-08 @ TPS Turku L 2-439.6 876 914 17.59% 14.82% 67.60%-1.24 -3.4 0
1932-05-08 Turku W 2-030.7 891 835 69.13% 14.73% 16.14%+1.38 +4.0 2
1932-05-08 @ VPS L 0-230.7 835 891 16.14% 14.73% 69.13%-1.38 -4.0 0
1932-05-10 Helsingfors D 4-465.0 1061 1151 53.84% 15.14% 31.01%+0.21 -0.3 3
1932-05-10 @ HPS Helsinki D 4-465.0 1151 1061 31.01% 15.14% 53.84%-0.21 +0.3 3
1932-05-16 VPS W 5-348.8 773 895 49.63% 15.15% 35.22%-0.05 +6.0 2
1932-05-16 @ Sudet L 3-548.8 895 773 35.22% 15.15% 49.63%+0.05 -6.0 2
1932-05-16 Turku L 2-355.5 872 831 67.84% 14.80% 17.36%+1.26 -7.1 0
1932-05-16 @ Toverit Helsinki W 3-255.5 831 872 17.36% 14.80% 67.84%-1.26 +7.1 2
1932-05-20 Kiffen 08 W 2-033.1 865 893 61.13% 15.04% 23.83%+0.71 +5.8 2
1932-05-20 @ Toverit Helsinki L 0-233.1 893 865 23.83% 15.04% 61.13%-0.71 -5.8 2
1932-05-22 Sudet W 3-129.9 1151 779 84.64% 12.18% 3.18%+3.92 +0.7 5
1932-05-22 @ Helsingfors L 1-329.9 779 1151 3.18% 12.18% 84.64%-3.92 -0.7 2
1932-05-22 HPS Helsinki L 1-637.6 838 1061 35.67% 14.99% 49.34%-0.86 -16.0 2
1932-05-22 @ Turku W 6-137.6 1061 838 49.34% 14.99% 35.67%+0.86 +16.0 5
1932-05-22 TPS Turku W 5-029.6 889 917 61.15% 15.04% 23.81%+0.71 +13.6 4
1932-05-22 @ VPS L 0-529.6 917 889 23.81% 15.04% 61.15%-0.71 -13.6 2
1932-05-25 Toverit Helsinki W 6-232.5 1152 871 81.77% 13.09% 5.14%+3.19 +1.8 7
1932-05-25 @ Helsingfors L 2-632.5 871 1152 5.14% 13.09% 81.77%-3.19 -1.8 2
1932-05-25 Turku W 8-027.3 904 822 71.11% 14.61% 14.28%+1.58 +13.2 4
1932-05-25 @ TPS Turku L 0-827.3 822 904 14.28% 14.61% 71.11%-1.58 -13.2 2
1932-05-26 HPS Helsinki D 2-256.5 887 1077 40.17% 15.07% 44.76%-0.59 +0.1 3
1932-05-26 @ Kiffen 08 D 2-256.5 1077 887 44.76% 15.07% 40.17%+0.59 -0.1 6
1932-05-29 Turku W 2-030.2 887 809 70.87% 14.62% 14.51%+1.56 +3.7 5
1932-05-29 @ Kiffen 08 L 0-230.2 809 887 14.51% 14.62% 70.87%-1.56 -3.7 2
1932-05-29 Toverit Helsinki W 5-137.1 779 869 53.76% 15.14% 31.10%+0.20 +11.6 4
1932-05-29 @ Sudet L 1-537.1 869 779 31.10% 15.14% 53.76%-0.20 -11.6 2
1932-05-29 Helsingfors D 2-256.5 917 1154 33.75% 14.94% 51.31%-0.97 +0.3 5
1932-05-29 @ TPS Turku D 2-256.5 1154 917 51.31% 14.94% 33.75%+0.97 -0.3 8
1932-05-29 HPS Helsinki D 3-361.2 903 1077 42.44% 15.10% 42.46%-0.47 +0.0 5
1932-05-29 @ VPS D 3-361.2 1077 903 42.46% 15.10% 42.44%+0.47 +0.0 7
1932-06-01 Helsingfors W 2-147.2 891 1153 30.52% 14.85% 54.63%-1.18 +6.0 7
1932-06-01 @ Kiffen 08 L 1-247.2 1153 891 54.63% 14.85% 30.52%+1.18 -6.0 8
1932-06-02 Toverit Helsinki W 4-130.4 1077 857 79.25% 13.64% 7.10%+2.69 +2.2 9
1932-06-02 @ HPS Helsinki L 1-430.4 857 1077 7.10% 13.64% 79.25%-2.69 -2.2 2
1932-06-05 TPS Turku W 5-130.3 1079 917 76.37% 14.09% 9.54%+2.23 +3.8 11
1932-06-05 @ HPS Helsinki L 1-530.3 917 1079 9.54% 14.09% 76.37%-2.23 -3.8 5
1932-06-05 Sudet L 0-147.5 805 790 65.50% 14.91% 19.60%+1.05 -7.6 2
1932-06-05 @ Turku W 1-047.5 790 805 19.60% 14.91% 65.50%-1.05 +7.6 6
1932-06-05 Kiffen 08 W 4-345.8 903 897 64.63% 14.94% 20.43%+0.98 +2.3 7
1932-06-05 @ VPS L 3-445.8 897 903 20.43% 14.94% 64.63%-0.98 -2.3 7
1932-06-12 VPS L 2-358.8 1147 905 80.24% 13.45% 6.31%+2.87 -8.4 8
1932-06-12 @ Helsingfors W 3-258.8 905 1147 6.31% 13.45% 80.24%-2.87 +8.4 9
1932-06-12 TPS Turku D 1-152.7 798 913 50.54% 15.15% 34.31%+0.00 -0.4 7
1932-06-12 @ Sudet D 1-152.7 913 798 34.31% 15.15% 50.54%+0.00 +0.4 6
1932-06-17 TPS Turku W 2-137.7 895 914 62.06% 15.02% 22.92%+0.78 +2.8 9
1932-06-17 @ Kiffen 08 L 1-237.7 914 895 22.92% 15.02% 62.06%-0.78 -2.8 6
1932-06-26 VPS W 4-031.2 855 914 57.68% 15.10% 27.22%+0.46 +12.4 4
1932-06-26 @ Toverit Helsinki L 0-431.2 914 855 27.22% 15.10% 57.68%-0.46 -12.4 9
1932-07-31 Turku L 1-453.1 1139 798 83.76% 12.50% 3.74%+3.67 -22.4 8
1932-07-31 @ Helsingfors W 4-153.1 798 1139 3.74% 12.50% 83.76%-3.67 +22.4 4
1932-08-07 VPS W 9-127.6 1083 901 77.42% 13.95% 8.63%+2.39 +6.6 13
1932-08-07 @ HPS Helsinki L 1-927.6 901 1083 8.63% 13.95% 77.42%-2.39 -6.6 9
1932-08-07 Sudet W 3-027.8 911 797 73.39% 14.42% 12.19%+1.84 +4.5 8
1932-08-07 @ TPS Turku L 0-327.8 797 911 12.19% 14.42% 73.39%-1.84 -4.5 7
1932-08-10 Toverit Helsinki L 2-355.2 897 868 66.84% 14.85% 18.31%+1.17 -7.0 9
1932-08-10 @ Kiffen 08 W 3-255.2 868 897 18.31% 14.85% 66.84%-1.17 +7.0 6
1932-08-10 TPS Turku L 0-538.4 820 915 53.17% 15.15% 31.69%+0.17 -27.5 4
1932-08-10 @ Turku W 5-038.4 915 820 31.69% 15.15% 53.17%-0.17 +27.5 10
1932-08-14 TPS Turku L 0-341.3 875 943 56.51% 15.12% 28.37%+0.38 -18.1 6
1932-08-14 @ Toverit Helsinki W 3-041.3 943 875 28.37% 15.12% 56.51%-0.38 +18.1 12
1932-08-14 Kiffen 08 W 2-140.4 793 890 52.85% 15.15% 32.01%+0.15 +3.8 6
1932-08-14 @ Turku L 1-240.4 890 793 32.01% 15.15% 52.85%-0.15 -3.8 9
1932-08-15 HPS Helsinki W 5-028.0 1117 1089 66.61% 14.86% 18.52%+1.15 +10.8 10
1932-08-15 @ Helsingfors L 0-528.0 1089 1117 18.52% 14.86% 66.61%-1.15 -10.8 13
1932-08-21 Turku W 8-234.8 793 796 63.67% 14.97% 21.36%+0.90 +10.0 9
1932-08-21 @ Sudet L 2-834.8 796 793 21.36% 14.97% 63.67%-0.90 -10.0 6
1932-08-21 VPS D 3-361.3 961 895 69.95% 14.68% 15.37%+1.46 -1.0 13
1932-08-21 @ TPS Turku D 3-361.3 895 961 15.37% 14.68% 69.95%-1.46 +1.0 10
1932-08-23 Helsingfors L 1-338.6 857 1127 29.52% 14.81% 55.67%-1.25 -6.1 6
1932-08-23 @ Toverit Helsinki W 3-138.6 1127 857 55.67% 14.81% 29.52%+1.25 +6.1 12
1932-08-25 Kiffen 08 W 4-025.2 1079 887 77.96% 13.87% 8.17%+2.47 +4.0 15
1932-08-25 @ HPS Helsinki L 0-425.2 887 1079 8.17% 13.87% 77.96%-2.47 -4.0 9
1932-08-28 Sudet W 4-027.0 896 803 71.95% 14.54% 13.50%+1.67 +6.5 12
1932-08-28 @ VPS L 0-427.0 803 896 13.50% 14.54% 71.95%-1.67 -6.5 9
1932-09-02 HPS Helsinki D 1-152.8 850 1083 34.39% 14.96% 50.65%-0.93 +0.4 7
1932-09-02 @ Toverit Helsinki D 1-152.8 1083 850 50.65% 14.96% 34.39%+0.93 -0.4 16
1932-09-04 TPS Turku W 5-024.8 1133 960 77.00% 14.01% 8.99%+2.32 +5.4 14
1932-09-04 @ Helsingfors L 0-524.8 960 1133 8.99% 14.01% 77.00%-2.32 -5.4 13
1932-09-04 VPS L 2-350.4 787 902 50.50% 15.15% 34.35%+0.00 -5.3 6
1932-09-04 @ Turku W 3-250.4 902 787 34.35% 15.15% 50.50%+0.00 +5.3 14
1932-09-07 Kiffen 08 W 4-235.7 1139 883 80.82% 13.32% 5.86%+2.99 +1.2 16
1932-09-07 @ Helsingfors L 2-435.7 883 1139 5.86% 13.32% 80.82%-2.99 -1.1 9
1932-09-11 Sudet W 3-236.1 1082 796 81.93% 13.05% 5.02%+3.23 +0.6 18
1932-09-11 @ HPS Helsinki L 2-336.1 796 1082 5.02% 13.05% 81.93%-3.23 -0.6 9
1932-09-11 Toverit Helsinki W 3-138.3 781 851 56.33% 15.12% 28.55%+0.37 +5.9 8
1932-09-11 @ Turku L 1-338.3 851 781 28.55% 15.12% 56.33%-0.37 -5.9 7
1932-09-11 Helsingfors D 3-361.2 907 1140 34.34% 14.96% 50.70%-0.94 +0.3 15
1932-09-11 @ VPS D 3-361.2 1140 907 50.70% 14.96% 34.34%+0.94 -0.3 17
1932-09-18 Sudet W 6-236.5 845 796 68.54% 14.77% 16.69%+1.33 +5.6 9
1932-09-18 @ Toverit Helsinki L 2-636.5 796 845 16.69% 14.77% 68.54%-1.33 -5.6 9
1932-09-18 Kiffen 08 W 4-027.4 955 881 70.48% 14.65% 14.87%+1.52 +7.1 15
1932-09-18 @ TPS Turku L 0-427.4 881 955 14.87% 14.65% 70.48%-1.52 -7.1 9
1932-09-25 VPS L 0-941.7 874 908 60.53% 15.05% 24.42%+0.66 -54.4 9
1932-09-25 @ Kiffen 08 W 9-041.7 908 874 24.42% 15.05% 60.53%-0.66 +54.4 17
1932-09-25 Helsingfors W 2-150.0 790 1140 21.04% 14.39% 64.57%-1.88 +7.1 11
1932-09-25 @ Sudet L 1-250.0 1140 790 64.57% 14.39% 21.04%+1.88 -7.1 17
1932-09-25 HPS Helsinki L 2-449.4 962 1083 49.76% 15.15% 35.09%-0.04 -8.6 15
1932-09-25 @ TPS Turku W 4-249.4 1083 962 35.09% 15.15% 49.76%+0.04 +8.6 20
1932-10-02 Turku L 1-353.9 1091 787 82.58% 12.87% 4.55%+3.37 -15.7 20
1932-10-02 @ HPS Helsinki W 3-153.9 787 1091 4.55% 12.87% 82.58%-3.37 +15.7 10
1932-10-02 Kiffen 08 W 4-030.0 797 820 61.69% 15.03% 23.28%+0.75 +10.8 13
1932-10-02 @ Sudet L 0-430.0 820 797 23.28% 15.03% 61.69%-0.75 -10.8 9
1932-10-02 Toverit Helsinki W 8-129.2 962 851 73.27% 14.43% 12.30%+1.83 +8.3 19
1932-10-02 @ VPS L 1-829.2 851 962 12.30% 14.43% 73.27%-1.83 -8.2 9

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1932-07-31 3.74% Turku 798 4 @ Helsingfors 1139 1
2 1932-10-02 4.55% Turku 787 3 @ HPS Helsinki 1091 1
3 1932-06-12 6.31% VPS 905 3 @ Helsingfors 1147 2
4 1932-05-16 17.36% Turku 831 3 @ Toverit Helsinki 872 2
5 1932-08-10 18.31% Toverit Helsinki 868 3 @ Kiffen 08 897 2
6 1932-06-05 19.60% Sudet 790 1 @ Turku 805 0
7 1932-09-25 21.04% @ Sudet 790 2 Helsingfors 1140 1
8 1932-09-25 24.42% VPS 908 9 @ Kiffen 08 874 0
9 1932-08-14 28.37% TPS Turku 943 3 @ Toverit Helsinki 875 0
10 1932-06-01 30.52% @ Kiffen 08 891 2 Helsingfors 1153 1
11 1932-08-10 31.69% TPS Turku 915 5 @ Turku 820 0
12 1932-09-04 34.35% VPS 902 3 @ Turku 787 2
13 1932-09-25 35.09% HPS Helsinki 1083 4 @ TPS Turku 962 2

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1932-09-25 54.38 VPS 9 908 24.42% @ Kiffen 08 0 874 60.53% 15.05%
2 1932-08-10 27.50 TPS Turku 5 915 31.69% @ Turku 0 820 53.17% 15.15%
3 1932-07-31 22.41 Turku 4 798 3.74% @ Helsingfors 1 1139 83.76% 12.50%
4 1932-08-14 18.09 TPS Turku 3 943 28.37% @ Toverit Helsinki 0 875 56.51% 15.12%
5 1932-05-22 16.03 HPS Helsinki 6 1061 49.34% @ Turku 1 838 35.67% 14.99%
6 1932-10-02 15.66 Turku 3 787 4.55% @ HPS Helsinki 1 1091 82.58% 12.87%
7 1932-05-22 13.56 @ VPS 5 889 61.15% TPS Turku 0 917 23.81% 15.04%
8 1932-05-25 13.16 @ TPS Turku 8 904 71.11% Turku 0 822 14.28% 14.61%
9 1932-06-26 12.41 @ Toverit Helsinki 4 855 57.68% VPS 0 914 27.22% 15.10%
10 1932-05-05 12.31 Helsingfors 4 1139 58.14% @ Turku 0 848 27.14% 14.72%
11 1932-05-29 11.64 @ Sudet 5 779 53.76% Toverit Helsinki 1 869 31.10% 15.14%
12 1932-10-02 10.78 @ Sudet 4 797 61.69% Kiffen 08 0 820 23.28% 15.03%
13 1932-08-15 10.77 @ Helsingfors 5 1117 66.61% HPS Helsinki 0 1089 18.52% 14.86%
14 1932-05-05 10.55 HPS Helsinki 3 1051 54.37% @ Sudet 0 790 30.77% 14.85%
15 1932-08-21 9.97 @ Sudet 8 793 63.67% Turku 2 796 21.36% 14.97%
16 1932-09-25 8.57 HPS Helsinki 4 1083 35.09% @ TPS Turku 2 962 49.76% 15.15%
17 1932-06-12 8.37 VPS 3 905 6.31% @ Helsingfors 2 1147 80.24% 13.45%
18 1932-10-02 8.26 @ VPS 8 962 73.27% Toverit Helsinki 1 851 12.30% 14.43%
19 1932-06-05 7.63 Sudet 1 790 19.60% @ Turku 0 805 65.50% 14.91%
20 1932-09-18 7.11 @ TPS Turku 4 955 70.48% Kiffen 08 0 881 14.87% 14.65%
21 1932-05-16 7.07 Turku 3 831 17.36% @ Toverit Helsinki 2 872 67.84% 14.80%
22 1932-09-25 7.06 @ Sudet 2 790 21.04% Helsingfors 1 1140 64.57% 14.39%
23 1932-08-10 6.97 Toverit Helsinki 3 868 18.31% @ Kiffen 08 2 897 66.84% 14.85%
24 1932-08-07 6.62 @ HPS Helsinki 9 1083 77.42% VPS 1 901 8.63% 13.95%
25 1932-08-28 6.48 @ VPS 4 896 71.95% Sudet 0 803 13.50% 14.54%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1932-05-10 65.0 @ HPS Helsinki 4 1061 53.84% Helsingfors 4 1151 31.01% 15.14%
2 1932-08-21 61.3 @ TPS Turku 3 961 69.95% VPS 3 895 15.37% 14.68%
3 1932-05-29 61.2 @ VPS 3 903 42.44% HPS Helsinki 3 1077 42.46% 15.10%
4 1932-09-11 61.2 @ VPS 3 907 34.34% Helsingfors 3 1140 50.70% 14.96%
5 1932-06-12 58.8 VPS 3 905 6.31% @ Helsingfors 2 1147 80.24% 13.45%
6 1932-05-26 56.5 @ Kiffen 08 2 887 40.17% HPS Helsinki 2 1077 44.76% 15.07%
7 1932-05-29 56.5 @ TPS Turku 2 917 33.75% Helsingfors 2 1154 51.31% 14.94%
8 1932-05-16 55.5 Turku 3 831 17.36% @ Toverit Helsinki 2 872 67.84% 14.80%
9 1932-08-10 55.2 Toverit Helsinki 3 868 18.31% @ Kiffen 08 2 897 66.84% 14.85%
10 1932-10-02 53.9 Turku 3 787 4.55% @ HPS Helsinki 1 1091 82.58% 12.87%
11 1932-07-31 53.1 Turku 4 798 3.74% @ Helsingfors 1 1139 83.76% 12.50%
12 1932-09-02 52.8 @ Toverit Helsinki 1 850 34.39% HPS Helsinki 1 1083 50.65% 14.96%
13 1932-06-12 52.7 @ Sudet 1 798 50.54% TPS Turku 1 913 34.31% 15.15%
14 1932-09-04 50.4 VPS 3 902 34.35% @ Turku 2 787 50.50% 15.15%
15 1932-09-25 50.0 @ Sudet 2 790 21.04% Helsingfors 1 1140 64.57% 14.39%
16 1932-09-25 49.4 HPS Helsinki 4 1083 35.09% @ TPS Turku 2 962 49.76% 15.15%
17 1932-05-16 48.8 @ Sudet 5 773 49.63% VPS 3 895 35.22% 15.15%
18 1932-06-05 47.5 Sudet 1 790 19.60% @ Turku 0 805 65.50% 14.91%
19 1932-06-01 47.2 @ Kiffen 08 2 891 30.52% Helsingfors 1 1153 54.63% 14.85%
20 1932-06-05 45.8 @ VPS 4 903 64.63% Kiffen 08 3 897 20.43% 14.94%
21 1932-09-25 41.7 VPS 9 908 24.42% @ Kiffen 08 0 874 60.53% 15.05%
22 1932-08-14 41.3 TPS Turku 3 943 28.37% @ Toverit Helsinki 0 875 56.51% 15.12%
23 1932-08-14 40.4 @ Turku 2 793 52.85% Kiffen 08 1 890 32.01% 15.15%
24 1932-05-08 39.6 @ TPS Turku 4 914 67.60% Toverit Helsinki 2 876 17.59% 14.82%
25 1932-08-23 38.6 Helsingfors 3 1127 55.67% @ Toverit Helsinki 1 857 29.52% 14.81%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1932-09-04 24.8 @ Helsingfors 5 1133 77.00% TPS Turku 0 960 8.99% 14.01%
2 1932-08-25 25.2 @ HPS Helsinki 4 1079 77.96% Kiffen 08 0 887 8.17% 13.87%
3 1932-08-28 27.0 @ VPS 4 896 71.95% Sudet 0 803 13.50% 14.54%
4 1932-05-25 27.3 @ TPS Turku 8 904 71.11% Turku 0 822 14.28% 14.61%
5 1932-09-18 27.4 @ TPS Turku 4 955 70.48% Kiffen 08 0 881 14.87% 14.65%
6 1932-08-07 27.6 @ HPS Helsinki 9 1083 77.42% VPS 1 901 8.63% 13.95%
7 1932-08-07 27.8 @ TPS Turku 3 911 73.39% Sudet 0 797 12.19% 14.42%
8 1932-08-15 28.0 @ Helsingfors 5 1117 66.61% HPS Helsinki 0 1089 18.52% 14.86%
9 1932-10-02 29.2 @ VPS 8 962 73.27% Toverit Helsinki 1 851 12.30% 14.43%
10 1932-05-22 29.6 @ VPS 5 889 61.15% TPS Turku 0 917 23.81% 15.04%
11 1932-05-22 29.9 @ Helsingfors 3 1151 84.64% Sudet 1 779 3.18% 12.18%
12 1932-10-02 30.0 @ Sudet 4 797 61.69% Kiffen 08 0 820 23.28% 15.03%
13 1932-05-29 30.2 @ Kiffen 08 2 887 70.87% Turku 0 809 14.51% 14.62%
14 1932-06-05 30.3 @ HPS Helsinki 5 1079 76.37% TPS Turku 1 917 9.54% 14.09%
15 1932-06-02 30.4 @ HPS Helsinki 4 1077 79.25% Toverit Helsinki 1 857 7.10% 13.64%
16 1932-05-08 30.5 @ Kiffen 08 6 887 72.97% Sudet 1 780 12.57% 14.46%
17 1932-05-08 30.7 @ VPS 2 891 69.13% Turku 0 835 16.14% 14.73%
18 1932-05-05 31.1 Helsingfors 4 1139 58.14% @ Turku 0 848 27.14% 14.72%
19 1932-06-26 31.2 @ Toverit Helsinki 4 855 57.68% VPS 0 914 27.22% 15.10%
20 1932-05-25 32.5 @ Helsingfors 6 1152 81.77% Toverit Helsinki 2 871 5.14% 13.09%
21 1932-05-20 33.1 @ Toverit Helsinki 2 865 61.13% Kiffen 08 0 893 23.83% 15.04%
22 1932-05-05 33.5 HPS Helsinki 3 1051 54.37% @ Sudet 0 790 30.77% 14.85%
23 1932-08-21 34.8 @ Sudet 8 793 63.67% Turku 2 796 21.36% 14.97%
24 1932-09-07 35.7 @ Helsingfors 4 1139 80.82% Kiffen 08 2 883 5.86% 13.32%
25 1932-09-11 36.1 @ HPS Helsinki 3 1082 81.93% Sudet 2 796 5.02% 13.05%