‹ ›

1961 Úrvalsdeild Season

30 games

Final

Champion

KR Reykjavik

16 points · 3rd Title

Last Title: 1959.0

Relegated

IB Hafnarfjordur

1 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Valur Reykjavik

2.73 points above expected

13 points · 10.27 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

IB Hafnarfjordur

3.96 points below expected

1 points · 4.96 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 KR Reykjavik Champion 10 7 2 1 16 34 11 +23 15.47 +0.53
2 IA Akranes 10 7 1 2 15 18 11 +7 12.58 +2.42
3 Valur Reykjavik 10 5 3 2 13 18 12 +6 10.27 +2.73
4 IBA Akureyri 10 4 1 5 9 23 23 0 8.16 +0.84
5 Fram Reykjavik 10 2 2 6 6 11 18 -7 8.56 -2.56
6 IB Hafnarfjordur Relegated 10 0 1 9 1 5 34 -29 4.96 -3.96

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Valur Reykjavik 13 10.27 +2.73
2 IA Akranes 15 12.58 +2.42
3 IBA Akureyri 9 8.16 +0.84
4 KR Reykjavik 16 15.47 +0.53
5 Fram Reykjavik 6 8.56 -2.56

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 IB Hafnarfjordur 1 4.96 -3.96
2 Fram Reykjavik 6 8.56 -2.56
3 KR Reykjavik 16 15.47 +0.53
4 IBA Akureyri 9 8.16 +0.84
5 IA Akranes 15 12.58 +2.42

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IA Akranes 4 Jun 4 – Jul 14 1 in 8
2 Valur Reykjavik 2 Jul 13 – Jul 16 1 in 6
3 KR Reykjavik 4 Jul 17 – Aug 2 1 in 4
4 IBA Akureyri 1 Jul 9 – Jul 9 1 in 3
5 Fram Reykjavik 1 Jun 25 – Jun 25 1 in 2

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IB Hafnarfjordur 6 Jul 26 – Sep 2 1 in 10
2 Fram Reykjavik 3 Jul 9 – Jul 19 1 in 7
3 KR Reykjavik 1 Aug 10 – Aug 10 1 in 5
4 IA Akranes 1 Jul 16 – Jul 16 1 in 4
5 IBA Akureyri 2 Jul 14 – Jul 23 1 in 2

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Fram Reykjavik 2 Jun 25 – Jul 2 1 in 5
2 IBA Akureyri 2 Jun 30 – Jul 9 1 in 5
3 Valur Reykjavik 4 Jul 13 – Jul 30 1 in 4
4 IB Hafnarfjordur 1 Jul 23 – Jul 23 1 in 4
5 IA Akranes 4 Jun 4 – Jul 14 1 in 3

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 KR Reykjavik 2 Jun 26 – Jul 2 1 in 9
2 Fram Reykjavik 6 Jul 2 – Jul 30 1 in 9
3 IB Hafnarfjordur 10 Jun 25 – Sep 2 1 in 6
4 Valur Reykjavik 3 Jun 26 – Jul 2 1 in 4
5 IA Akranes 1 Jul 16 – Jul 16 1 in 2

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
KR Reykjavik 1374 16 +53 8 7.6 +0.4
IA Akranes 1184 15 +9 7 5.8 +1.2
Valur Reykjavik 1153 13 +49 7 5.5 +1.5
IBA Akureyri 1060 9 +109 6 5.3 +0.7
Fram Reykjavik 957 6 -76 3 4.0 -1.0
IB Hafnarfjordur 749 1 -105 0 2.4 -2.4

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team FR IA IH IA KR VR
Fram Reykjavik —
0-0-2
1.99
2-0-0
3.19
0-0-2
3.30
0-1-1
1.24
0-1-1
2.38
IA Akranes
2-0-0
3.66
—
1-1-0
4.58
2-0-0
4.18
1-0-1
1.85
1-0-1
3.72
IB Hafnarfjordur
0-0-2
2.45
0-1-1
1.07
—
0-0-2
1.19
0-0-2
0.57
0-0-2
1.32
IBA Akureyri
2-0-0
2.35
0-0-2
1.47
2-0-0
4.46
—
0-0-2
1.00
0-1-1
2.10
KR Reykjavik
1-1-0
4.42
1-0-1
3.79
2-0-0
5.10
2-0-0
4.65
—
1-1-0
4.21
Valur Reykjavik
1-1-0
3.27
1-0-1
1.93
2-0-0
4.33
1-1-0
3.55
0-1-1
1.44
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.66 +4.7
Allowed 0.85 -5.9
Differential 0.91 +3.2

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.33%6.67%5.00%3.33%3.33%3.33%25.00%
16.67%6.67%5.00%5.00%3.33%3.33%30.00%
25.00%5.00%6.67%——1.67%18.33%
33.33%5.00%———1.67%10.00%
43.33%3.33%————6.67%
5+3.33%3.33%1.67%1.67%——10.00%
Total25.00%30.00%18.33%10.00%6.67%10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.82 1.82 +0.00
SD 1.79 1.79 2.86
CV 0.99 0.99 —
Max 7 7 +7
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%——40.00%
1—10.00%20.00%——10.00%40.00%
2———————
310.00%—————10.00%
4—10.00%————10.00%
5+———————
Total20.00%30.00%30.00%10.00%—10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.10 1.80 -0.70
SD 1.37 1.75 2.45
CV 1.25 0.97 —
Max 4 6 +3
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0————10.00%—10.00%
120.00%10.00%—10.00%——40.00%
210.00%10.00%————20.00%
310.00%10.00%————20.00%
4—10.00%————10.00%
5+———————
Total40.00%40.00%—10.00%10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.80 1.10 +0.70
SD 1.23 1.37 2.21
CV 0.68 1.25 —
Max 4 4 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——20.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%50.00%
1—10.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%50.00%
2———————
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total—10.00%30.00%20.00%20.00%20.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.50 3.40 -2.90
SD 0.53 1.90 2.02
CV 1.05 0.56 —
Max 1 7 +0
Min 0 1 -7

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—20.00%———10.00%30.00%
1————10.00%—10.00%
2—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
3—10.00%———10.00%20.00%
4———————
5+—20.00%————20.00%
Total—60.00%10.00%—10.00%20.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.30 2.30 +0.00
SD 2.26 1.95 3.33
CV 0.98 0.85 —
Max 6 6 +5
Min 0 1 -5

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%—————10.00%
1———10.00%——10.00%
210.00%10.00%10.00%———30.00%
3———————
410.00%—————10.00%
5+20.00%—10.00%10.00%——40.00%
Total50.00%10.00%20.00%20.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.40 1.10 +2.30
SD 2.32 1.29 2.67
CV 0.68 1.17 —
Max 7 3 +7
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—10.00%————10.00%
120.00%10.00%————30.00%
210.00%—20.00%——10.00%40.00%
3—10.00%————10.00%
410.00%—————10.00%
5+———————
Total40.00%30.00%20.00%——10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.80 1.20 +0.60
SD 1.14 1.55 1.90
CV 0.63 1.29 —
Max 4 5 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
KR Reykjavik 1374 16 15.47 +0.53 65.0% 9 12 14 16 17 19 20
IA Akranes 1184 15 12.58 +2.42 85.0% 5 9 11 12 14 16 18
Valur Reykjavik 1153 13 10.27 +2.73 91.0% 5 5 9 10 12 14 16
IBA Akureyri 1060 9 8.16 +0.84 75.0% 3 4 7 8 9 12 15
Fram Reykjavik 957 6 8.56 -2.56 21.0% 2 3 7 9 10 13 14
IB Hafnarfjordur 749 1 4.96 -3.96 7.0% 0 1 3 5 6 9 11

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 4.5% * Slight Edge: 4.5% to 11% * Clear Edge: 11% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+3.57%
No Edge
42.86%17.86%39.29%
Elo Value
Home Edge: 12.41 Elo pts.
124 Elo
0.008 goals per Elo point
0400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.54 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.10+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd * Longshot: 4th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.07 * Tight Race: 0.07 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.33 * Runaway: 0.33 and up.
Title-Race Openness
1.6
One-Team Race
12346
Champion Preseason Odds
76%
KR Reykjavik, 1st of 6
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.10/gm
Tight Race
00.290.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 1.98 * Some Luck: 1.98 to 2.96 * Lucky: 2.96 to 3.95 * Wild Swing: 3.95 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 0.55 * Close: 0.55 to 0.82 * Off: 0.82 to 1.1 * Way Off: 1.1 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 6 * As Expected: 6 to 9.6 * Several Outliers: 9.6 to 13.2 * Many Outliers: 13.2 and up.
Unexpected Relegations
Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 0.5 * A Surprise: 0.5 to 0.8 * Several Surprises: 0.8 to 1.1 * Many Surprises: 1.1 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
2.47 points
Some Luck
02.476
Average Finish Error
Expected
0.33
Pinpoint
00.691.5
Biggest Overachiever
Expected
91.00%
Valur Reykjavik
5091.67%100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
7.00%
IB Hafnarfjordur
08.33%50
Season Outliers
Expected
0 of 6
Minimal Outliers
00.66
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
0 of 1
As Expected
00.31

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.16 * Even: 0.16 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.65 * Strong Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Wide Separation: 1.85 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 63% * Slight Edge: 63% to 69% * Clear Edge: 69% to 75.5% * Wide Edge: 75.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 80.5% * Clear Edge: 80.5% to 88.5% * Strong Edge: 88.5% to 94% * Dominant: 94% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 55% * Some Drama: 55% to 61% * Frequent: 61% to 65% * Very Frequent: 65% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 14.5% * Occasional: 14.5% to 18% * Frequent: 18% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.29
Lopsided
00.160.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 213.55
2.01
Wide Separation
0.71.351.652.5
Interquartile Edge
75%
Clear Edge
50%63%69%75.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 97%
97%
Dominant
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
40%
Few
0%41%100%
Blowouts
Expected
40%
Very Frequent
0%37%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.28 * Slight Separation: 0.28 to 0.36 * Notable Separation: 0.36 to 0.41 * Lopsided: 0.41 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.33 * Some Carryover: 0.33 to 0.59 * Strong Carryover: 0.59 to 0.75 * Near-Lock: 0.75 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24.5% * Upset-Prone: 24.5% to 29% * Very Upset-Prone: 29% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 16% * As Expected: 16% to 21.5% * Shaky Favorites: 21.5% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.47
Highly Predictable
00.532
Matchup Imbalance
0.49
Lopsided
00.280.360.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.01
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.83
Near-Lock
00.330.590.751
Upset Rate
Expected
17%
Chalky
0%21%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
8%
Solid Favorites
0%18%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.29 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.29 to 0.43 * Above Noise: 0.43 to 0.57 * Well Above Noise: 0.57 and up.
Probability calibration
0.88
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.82
Very Underconfident
01.002.07153
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.156
Well Within Noise
00.2850.8

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456
KR Reykjavik76.00%20.00%3.00%1.00%——
IA Akranes19.00%45.00%19.00%14.00%2.00%1.00%
Valur Reykjavik4.00%24.00%38.00%20.00%10.00%4.00%
IBA Akureyri—5.00%14.00%29.00%41.00%11.00%
Fram Reykjavik1.00%6.00%24.00%29.00%27.00%13.00%
IB Hafnarfjordur——2.00%7.00%20.00%71.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
KR Reykjavik 100% —
IA Akranes 99.00% 1.00%
Valur Reykjavik 96.00% 4.00%
IBA Akureyri 89.00% 11.00%
Fram Reykjavik 87.00% 13.00%
IB Hafnarfjordur 29.00% 71.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1961-05-28 IBA Akureyri W 6-338.7 1274 991 72.18% 17.23% 10.59%+2.35 +12.5 2
1961-05-28 @ KR Reykjavik L 3-638.7 991 1274 10.59% 17.23% 72.18%-2.35 -12.5 0
1961-05-29 Valur Reykjavik L 0-144.0 1068 1047 46.76% 17.67% 35.57%+0.27 -25.1 0
1961-05-29 @ Fram Reykjavik W 1-044.0 1047 1068 35.57% 17.67% 46.76%-0.27 +25.1 2
1961-06-04 Fram Reykjavik W 3-035.0 1116 1043 51.17% 17.65% 31.18%+0.58 +48.9 2
1961-06-04 @ IA Akranes L 0-335.0 1043 1116 31.18% 17.65% 51.17%-0.58 -48.9 0
1961-06-25 IB Hafnarfjordur W 3-036.6 994 980 45.80% 17.67% 36.53%+0.21 +55.9 2
1961-06-25 @ Fram Reykjavik L 0-336.6 980 994 36.53% 17.67% 45.80%-0.21 -55.9 0
1961-06-26 Valur Reykjavik D 2-259.3 1287 1072 67.62% 17.41% 14.97%+1.81 -5.1 3
1961-06-26 @ KR Reykjavik D 2-259.3 1072 1287 14.97% 17.41% 67.62%-1.81 +5.1 3
1961-06-30 IBA Akureyri D 2-259.1 1077 979 56.47% 17.61% 25.91%+0.88 -2.8 4
1961-06-30 @ Valur Reykjavik D 2-259.1 979 1077 25.91% 17.61% 56.47%-0.88 +2.8 1
1961-07-02 IA Akranes L 0-232.3 924 1165 15.82% 17.41% 66.77%-1.82 -18.5 0
1961-07-02 @ IB Hafnarfjordur W 2-032.3 1165 924 66.77% 17.41% 15.82%+1.82 +18.5 4
1961-07-02 KR Reykjavik D 0-051.5 1050 1282 16.55% 17.43% 66.02%-1.75 +7.1 3
1961-07-02 @ Fram Reykjavik D 0-051.5 1282 1050 66.02% 17.43% 16.55%+1.75 -7.1 4
1961-07-02 Valur Reykjavik W 1-037.4 1184 1074 57.72% 17.60% 24.68%+0.97 +14.6 6
1961-07-02 @ IA Akranes L 0-137.4 1074 1184 24.68% 17.60% 57.72%-0.97 -14.6 4
1961-07-09 Fram Reykjavik W 2-148.6 982 1057 33.30% 17.66% 49.04%-0.50 +24.7 3
1961-07-09 @ IBA Akureyri L 1-248.6 1057 982 49.04% 17.66% 33.30%+0.50 -24.7 3
1961-07-13 IB Hafnarfjordur W 4-030.1 1060 906 62.38% 17.53% 20.09%+1.33 +43.5 6
1961-07-13 @ Valur Reykjavik L 0-430.1 906 1060 20.09% 17.53% 62.38%-1.33 -43.5 0
1961-07-14 IBA Akureyri W 4-135.2 1198 1006 65.76% 17.46% 16.78%+1.63 +23.9 8
1961-07-14 @ IA Akranes L 1-435.2 1006 1198 16.78% 17.46% 65.76%-1.63 -23.9 3
1961-07-16 IA Akranes W 3-148.6 1103 1222 27.86% 17.62% 54.53%-0.85 +47.1 8
1961-07-16 @ Valur Reykjavik L 1-348.6 1222 1103 54.53% 17.62% 27.86%+0.85 -47.1 8
1961-07-17 Fram Reykjavik W 2-031.6 1275 1032 69.61% 17.34% 13.05%+2.03 +15.5 6
1961-07-17 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-231.6 1032 1275 13.05% 17.34% 69.61%-2.03 -15.5 3
1961-07-19 IA Akranes L 1-241.0 1017 1175 23.45% 17.57% 58.98%-1.16 -13.1 3
1961-07-19 @ Fram Reykjavik W 2-141.0 1175 1017 58.98% 17.57% 23.45%+1.16 +13.1 10
1961-07-23 IB Hafnarfjordur D 1-154.7 1188 862 74.45% 17.10% 8.46%+2.69 -8.8 11
1961-07-23 @ IA Akranes D 1-154.7 862 1188 8.46% 17.10% 74.45%-2.69 +8.8 1
1961-07-23 KR Reykjavik L 0-526.8 983 1290 11.31% 17.23% 71.46%-2.35 -31.6 3
1961-07-23 @ IBA Akureyri W 5-026.8 1290 983 71.46% 17.23% 11.31%+2.35 +31.6 8
1961-07-24 Fram Reykjavik D 1-154.6 1150 1004 61.63% 17.55% 20.82%+1.27 -5.1 9
1961-07-24 @ Valur Reykjavik D 1-154.6 1004 1150 20.82% 17.55% 61.63%-1.27 +5.1 4
1961-07-26 IB Hafnarfjordur W 7-024.7 1322 871 79.07% 16.61% 4.32%+3.69 +17.2 10
1961-07-26 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-724.7 871 1322 4.32% 16.61% 79.07%-3.69 -17.1 1
1961-07-30 Valur Reykjavik L 0-231.2 854 1145 12.29% 17.28% 70.43%-2.22 -14.6 1
1961-07-30 @ IB Hafnarfjordur W 2-031.2 1145 854 70.43% 17.28% 12.29%+2.22 +14.6 11
1961-07-30 IBA Akureyri L 1-641.7 1009 951 49.21% 17.66% 33.13%+0.46 -95.9 4
1961-07-30 @ Fram Reykjavik W 6-141.7 951 1009 33.13% 17.66% 49.21%-0.46 +95.9 5
1961-08-02 KR Reykjavik L 2-540.4 1160 1339 21.28% 17.53% 61.19%-1.33 -25.6 11
1961-08-02 @ Valur Reykjavik W 5-240.4 1339 1160 61.19% 17.53% 21.28%+1.33 +25.6 12
1961-08-10 KR Reykjavik W 3-151.3 1179 1365 20.67% 17.52% 61.80%-1.38 +53.2 13
1961-08-10 @ IA Akranes L 1-351.3 1365 1179 61.80% 17.52% 20.67%+1.38 -53.2 12
1961-08-10 Fram Reykjavik L 1-440.2 839 913 33.49% 17.66% 48.86%-0.49 -43.8 1
1961-08-10 @ IB Hafnarfjordur W 4-140.2 913 839 48.86% 17.66% 33.49%+0.49 +43.8 6
1961-08-13 IA Akranes L 0-136.1 1047 1232 20.64% 17.52% 61.83%-1.38 -12.5 5
1961-08-13 @ IBA Akureyri W 1-036.1 1232 1047 61.83% 17.52% 20.64%+1.38 +12.5 15
1961-08-13 KR Reykjavik L 1-234.7 795 1311 3.72% 16.42% 79.85%-4.01 -2.3 1
1961-08-13 @ IB Hafnarfjordur W 2-134.7 1311 795 79.85% 16.42% 3.72%+4.01 +2.3 14
1961-08-15 IBA Akureyri L 1-336.8 793 1034 15.80% 17.41% 66.79%-1.82 -16.0 1
1961-08-15 @ IB Hafnarfjordur W 3-136.8 1034 793 66.79% 17.41% 15.80%+1.82 +16.0 7
1961-08-20 Valur Reykjavik L 0-139.6 1050 1134 32.19% 17.65% 50.16%-0.57 -18.3 7
1961-08-20 @ IBA Akureyri W 1-039.6 1134 1050 50.16% 17.65% 32.19%+0.57 +18.3 13
1961-09-02 IB Hafnarfjordur W 6-130.5 1032 777 70.45% 17.31% 12.24%+2.13 +28.2 9
1961-09-02 @ IBA Akureyri L 1-630.5 777 1032 12.24% 17.31% 70.45%-2.13 -28.2 1
1961-09-10 IA Akranes W 4-033.7 1314 1245 52.97% 17.64% 29.39%+0.65 +60.7 16
1961-09-10 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-433.7 1245 1314 29.39% 17.64% 52.97%-0.65 -60.7 15

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1961-08-10 20.67% @ IA Akranes 1179 3 KR Reykjavik 1365 1
2 1961-07-16 27.86% @ Valur Reykjavik 1103 3 IA Akranes 1222 1
3 1961-07-30 33.13% IBA Akureyri 951 6 @ Fram Reykjavik 1009 1
4 1961-07-09 33.30% @ IBA Akureyri 982 2 Fram Reykjavik 1057 1
5 1961-05-29 35.57% Valur Reykjavik 1047 1 @ Fram Reykjavik 1068 0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1961-07-30 95.87 IBA Akureyri 6 951 33.13% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1009 49.21% 17.66%
2 1961-09-10 60.72 @ KR Reykjavik 4 1314 52.97% IA Akranes 0 1245 29.39% 17.64%
3 1961-06-25 55.87 @ Fram Reykjavik 3 994 45.80% IB Hafnarfjordur 0 980 36.53% 17.67%
4 1961-08-10 53.19 @ IA Akranes 3 1179 20.67% KR Reykjavik 1 1365 61.80% 17.52%
5 1961-06-04 48.89 @ IA Akranes 3 1116 51.17% Fram Reykjavik 0 1043 31.18% 17.65%
6 1961-07-16 47.10 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1103 27.86% IA Akranes 1 1222 54.53% 17.62%
7 1961-08-10 43.79 Fram Reykjavik 4 913 48.86% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 839 33.49% 17.66%
8 1961-07-13 43.51 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1060 62.38% IB Hafnarfjordur 0 906 20.09% 17.53%
9 1961-07-23 31.62 KR Reykjavik 5 1290 71.46% @ IBA Akureyri 0 983 11.31% 17.23%
10 1961-09-02 28.23 @ IBA Akureyri 6 1032 70.45% IB Hafnarfjordur 1 777 12.24% 17.31%
11 1961-08-02 25.59 KR Reykjavik 5 1339 61.19% @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1160 21.28% 17.53%
12 1961-05-29 25.09 Valur Reykjavik 1 1047 35.57% @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1068 46.76% 17.67%
13 1961-07-09 24.68 @ IBA Akureyri 2 982 33.30% Fram Reykjavik 1 1057 49.04% 17.66%
14 1961-07-14 23.88 @ IA Akranes 4 1198 65.76% IBA Akureyri 1 1006 16.78% 17.46%
15 1961-07-02 18.48 IA Akranes 2 1165 66.77% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 0 924 15.82% 17.41%
16 1961-08-20 18.34 Valur Reykjavik 1 1134 50.16% @ IBA Akureyri 0 1050 32.19% 17.65%
17 1961-07-26 17.15 @ KR Reykjavik 7 1322 79.07% IB Hafnarfjordur 0 871 4.32% 16.61%
18 1961-08-15 15.98 IBA Akureyri 3 1034 66.79% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 793 15.80% 17.41%
19 1961-07-17 15.47 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1275 69.61% Fram Reykjavik 0 1032 13.05% 17.34%
20 1961-07-30 14.62 Valur Reykjavik 2 1145 70.43% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 0 854 12.29% 17.28%
21 1961-07-02 14.59 @ IA Akranes 1 1184 57.72% Valur Reykjavik 0 1074 24.68% 17.60%
22 1961-07-19 13.15 IA Akranes 2 1175 58.98% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1017 23.45% 17.57%
23 1961-05-28 12.49 @ KR Reykjavik 6 1274 72.18% IBA Akureyri 3 991 10.59% 17.23%
24 1961-08-13 12.46 IA Akranes 1 1232 61.83% @ IBA Akureyri 0 1047 20.64% 17.52%
25 1961-07-23 8.81 @ IA Akranes 1 1188 74.45% IB Hafnarfjordur 1 862 8.46% 17.10%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1961-06-26 59.3 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1287 67.62% Valur Reykjavik 2 1072 14.97% 17.41%
2 1961-06-30 59.1 @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1077 56.47% IBA Akureyri 2 979 25.91% 17.61%
3 1961-07-23 54.7 @ IA Akranes 1 1188 74.45% IB Hafnarfjordur 1 862 8.46% 17.10%
4 1961-07-24 54.6 @ Valur Reykjavik 1 1150 61.63% Fram Reykjavik 1 1004 20.82% 17.55%
5 1961-07-02 51.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1050 16.55% KR Reykjavik 0 1282 66.02% 17.43%
6 1961-08-10 51.3 @ IA Akranes 3 1179 20.67% KR Reykjavik 1 1365 61.80% 17.52%
7 1961-07-09 48.6 @ IBA Akureyri 2 982 33.30% Fram Reykjavik 1 1057 49.04% 17.66%
8 1961-07-16 48.6 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1103 27.86% IA Akranes 1 1222 54.53% 17.62%
9 1961-05-29 44.0 Valur Reykjavik 1 1047 35.57% @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1068 46.76% 17.67%
10 1961-07-30 41.7 IBA Akureyri 6 951 33.13% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1009 49.21% 17.66%
11 1961-07-19 41.0 IA Akranes 2 1175 58.98% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1017 23.45% 17.57%
12 1961-08-02 40.4 KR Reykjavik 5 1339 61.19% @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1160 21.28% 17.53%
13 1961-08-10 40.2 Fram Reykjavik 4 913 48.86% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 839 33.49% 17.66%
14 1961-08-20 39.6 Valur Reykjavik 1 1134 50.16% @ IBA Akureyri 0 1050 32.19% 17.65%
15 1961-05-28 38.7 @ KR Reykjavik 6 1274 72.18% IBA Akureyri 3 991 10.59% 17.23%
16 1961-07-02 37.4 @ IA Akranes 1 1184 57.72% Valur Reykjavik 0 1074 24.68% 17.60%
17 1961-08-15 36.8 IBA Akureyri 3 1034 66.79% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 793 15.80% 17.41%
18 1961-06-25 36.6 @ Fram Reykjavik 3 994 45.80% IB Hafnarfjordur 0 980 36.53% 17.67%
19 1961-08-13 36.1 IA Akranes 1 1232 61.83% @ IBA Akureyri 0 1047 20.64% 17.52%
20 1961-07-14 35.2 @ IA Akranes 4 1198 65.76% IBA Akureyri 1 1006 16.78% 17.46%
21 1961-06-04 35.0 @ IA Akranes 3 1116 51.17% Fram Reykjavik 0 1043 31.18% 17.65%
22 1961-08-13 34.7 KR Reykjavik 2 1311 79.85% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 795 3.72% 16.42%
23 1961-09-10 33.7 @ KR Reykjavik 4 1314 52.97% IA Akranes 0 1245 29.39% 17.64%
24 1961-07-02 32.3 IA Akranes 2 1165 66.77% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 0 924 15.82% 17.41%
25 1961-07-17 31.6 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1275 69.61% Fram Reykjavik 0 1032 13.05% 17.34%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1961-07-26 24.7 @ KR Reykjavik 7 1322 79.07% IB Hafnarfjordur 0 871 4.32% 16.61%
2 1961-07-23 26.8 KR Reykjavik 5 1290 71.46% @ IBA Akureyri 0 983 11.31% 17.23%
3 1961-07-13 30.1 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1060 62.38% IB Hafnarfjordur 0 906 20.09% 17.53%
4 1961-09-02 30.5 @ IBA Akureyri 6 1032 70.45% IB Hafnarfjordur 1 777 12.24% 17.31%
5 1961-07-30 31.2 Valur Reykjavik 2 1145 70.43% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 0 854 12.29% 17.28%
6 1961-07-17 31.6 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1275 69.61% Fram Reykjavik 0 1032 13.05% 17.34%
7 1961-07-02 32.3 IA Akranes 2 1165 66.77% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 0 924 15.82% 17.41%
8 1961-09-10 33.7 @ KR Reykjavik 4 1314 52.97% IA Akranes 0 1245 29.39% 17.64%
9 1961-08-13 34.7 KR Reykjavik 2 1311 79.85% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 795 3.72% 16.42%
10 1961-06-04 35.0 @ IA Akranes 3 1116 51.17% Fram Reykjavik 0 1043 31.18% 17.65%
11 1961-07-14 35.2 @ IA Akranes 4 1198 65.76% IBA Akureyri 1 1006 16.78% 17.46%
12 1961-08-13 36.1 IA Akranes 1 1232 61.83% @ IBA Akureyri 0 1047 20.64% 17.52%
13 1961-06-25 36.6 @ Fram Reykjavik 3 994 45.80% IB Hafnarfjordur 0 980 36.53% 17.67%
14 1961-08-15 36.8 IBA Akureyri 3 1034 66.79% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 793 15.80% 17.41%
15 1961-07-02 37.4 @ IA Akranes 1 1184 57.72% Valur Reykjavik 0 1074 24.68% 17.60%
16 1961-05-28 38.7 @ KR Reykjavik 6 1274 72.18% IBA Akureyri 3 991 10.59% 17.23%
17 1961-08-20 39.6 Valur Reykjavik 1 1134 50.16% @ IBA Akureyri 0 1050 32.19% 17.65%
18 1961-08-10 40.2 Fram Reykjavik 4 913 48.86% @ IB Hafnarfjordur 1 839 33.49% 17.66%
19 1961-08-02 40.4 KR Reykjavik 5 1339 61.19% @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1160 21.28% 17.53%
20 1961-07-19 41.0 IA Akranes 2 1175 58.98% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1017 23.45% 17.57%
21 1961-07-30 41.7 IBA Akureyri 6 951 33.13% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1009 49.21% 17.66%
22 1961-05-29 44.0 Valur Reykjavik 1 1047 35.57% @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1068 46.76% 17.67%
23 1961-07-09 48.6 @ IBA Akureyri 2 982 33.30% Fram Reykjavik 1 1057 49.04% 17.66%
24 1961-07-16 48.6 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1103 27.86% IA Akranes 1 1222 54.53% 17.62%
25 1961-08-10 51.3 @ IA Akranes 3 1179 20.67% KR Reykjavik 1 1365 61.80% 17.52%