‹ ›

1968 Úrvalsdeild Season

30 games

Final

Champion

KR Reykjavik

15 points · 6th Title

Last Title: 1965.0

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

KR Reykjavik

5.34 points above expected

15 points · 9.66 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Keflavik IF

3.43 points below expected

4 points · 7.43 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 KR Reykjavik Champion 10 6 3 1 15 27 16 +11 9.66 +5.34
2 Fram Reykjavik 10 4 4 2 12 17 15 +2 10.16 +1.84
3 Valur Reykjavik 10 3 4 3 10 18 15 +3 10.43 -0.43
4 IBA Akureyri 10 3 4 3 10 17 14 +3 12.11 -2.11
5 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 10 4 1 5 9 16 21 -5 10.21 -1.21
6 Keflavik IF 10 0 4 6 4 5 19 -14 7.43 -3.43

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 KR Reykjavik 15 9.66 +5.34
2 Fram Reykjavik 12 10.16 +1.84
3 Valur Reykjavik 10 10.43 -0.43
4 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 9 10.21 -1.21
5 IBA Akureyri 10 12.11 -2.11

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Keflavik IF 4 7.43 -3.43
2 IBA Akureyri 10 12.11 -2.11
3 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 9 10.21 -1.21
4 Valur Reykjavik 10 10.43 -0.43
5 Fram Reykjavik 12 10.16 +1.84

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 KR Reykjavik 6 Jun 25 – Aug 19 1 in 837
2 IBA Akureyri 2 May 25 – Jun 9 1 in 9
3 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 Aug 18 – Aug 24 1 in 9
4 Fram Reykjavik 1 Jun 13 – Jun 13 1 in 7
5 Valur Reykjavik 1 Jun 10 – Jun 10 1 in 3

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 Jun 13 – Jul 14 1 in 178
2 IBA Akureyri 3 Aug 11 – Aug 24 1 in 115
3 Keflavik IF 3 May 25 – Jun 25 1 in 23
4 KR Reykjavik 1 Jun 9 – Jun 9 1 in 3
5 Fram Reykjavik 1 Jul 15 – Jul 15 1 in 2

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 KR Reykjavik 8 Jun 13 – Aug 25 1 in 25
2 IBA Akureyri 7 May 25 – Jul 28 1 in 8
3 Fram Reykjavik 5 Jun 4 – Jul 6 1 in 7
4 Keflavik IF 2 Jul 6 – Jul 14 1 in 5
5 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 Aug 14 – Aug 24 1 in 4

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IBA Akureyri 6 Jul 7 – Aug 24 1 in 42
2 Keflavik IF 10 May 25 – Aug 25 1 in 10
3 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 Jun 13 – Jul 14 1 in 6
4 Valur Reykjavik 3 Jun 13 – Jul 7 1 in 5
5 Fram Reykjavik 2 Jul 6 – Jul 15 1 in 2

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
KR Reykjavik 1162 15 +41 9 5.7 +3.3
Fram Reykjavik 1109 12 -9 5 4.9 +0.1
Valur Reykjavik 1150 10 +19 6 5.5 +0.5
IBA Akureyri 1150 10 -50 2 6.5 -4.5
IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1102 9 +35 7 4.8 +2.2
Keflavik IF 964 4 -22 2 3.3 -1.3

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team FR IA IV KR KI VR
Fram Reykjavik —
1-1-0
2.11
1-1-0
2.49
0-1-1
2.70
1-1-0
3.58
1-0-1
2.39
IBA Akureyri
0-1-1
3.20
—
1-0-1
3.08
1-0-1
3.18
1-1-0
3.48
0-2-0
3.08
IBV Vestmannaeyjar
0-1-1
2.83
1-0-1
2.22
—
0-0-2
2.62
2-0-0
3.32
1-0-1
2.57
KR Reykjavik
1-1-0
2.60
1-0-1
2.13
2-0-0
2.68
—
1-1-0
3.44
1-1-0
2.34
Keflavik IF
0-1-1
1.74
0-1-1
1.87
0-0-2
1.99
0-1-1
1.88
—
0-1-1
1.94
Valur Reykjavik
1-0-1
2.91
0-2-0
2.22
1-0-1
2.73
0-1-1
2.98
1-1-0
3.39
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.93 +5.0
Allowed 0.25 -6.7
Differential 0.91 +4.1

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
06.67%3.33%3.33%6.67%—1.67%21.67%
13.33%13.33%5.00%3.33%1.67%—26.67%
23.33%5.00%13.33%1.67%5.00%—28.33%
36.67%3.33%1.67%—1.67%—13.33%
4—1.67%5.00%1.67%——8.33%
5+1.67%—————1.67%
Total21.67%26.67%28.33%13.33%8.33%1.67%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.67 1.67 +0.00
SD 1.34 1.34 1.98
CV 0.80 0.80 —
Max 6 6 +6
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%—————10.00%
1—20.00%—10.00%——30.00%
210.00%20.00%10.00%—10.00%—50.00%
3———————
4——10.00%———10.00%
5+———————
Total20.00%40.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.70 1.50 +0.20
SD 1.06 1.27 1.40
CV 0.62 0.85 —
Max 4 4 +2
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
110.00%30.00%10.00%———50.00%
2——10.00%10.00%10.00%—30.00%
320.00%—————20.00%
4———————
5+———————
Total30.00%30.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.70 1.40 +0.30
SD 0.82 1.35 1.64
CV 0.48 0.96 —
Max 3 4 +3
Min 1 0 -2

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%——20.00%——30.00%
110.00%———10.00%—20.00%
210.00%———10.00%—20.00%
3—10.00%——10.00%—20.00%
4——10.00%———10.00%
5+———————
Total30.00%10.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.60 2.10 -0.50
SD 1.43 1.73 2.17
CV 0.89 0.82 —
Max 4 4 +2
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———10.00%——10.00%
1———————
2—10.00%30.00%———40.00%
310.00%10.00%10.00%———30.00%
4———10.00%——10.00%
5+10.00%—————10.00%
Total20.00%20.00%40.00%20.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.70 1.60 +1.10
SD 1.57 1.07 2.33
CV 0.58 0.67 —
Max 6 3 +6
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%—10.00%60.00%
1—20.00%10.00%———30.00%
2——10.00%———10.00%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total10.00%40.00%30.00%10.00%—10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.50 1.90 -1.40
SD 0.71 1.66 1.90
CV 1.41 0.88 —
Max 2 6 +0
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%—10.00%———20.00%
1—10.00%10.00%10.00%——30.00%
2——20.00%———20.00%
310.00%—————10.00%
4—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
5+———————
Total20.00%20.00%50.00%10.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.80 1.50 +0.30
SD 1.48 0.97 1.83
CV 0.82 0.65 —
Max 4 3 +3
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 10

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
KR Reykjavik 1162 15 9.66 +5.34 98.0% 2 5 8 9 12 14 17
Valur Reykjavik 1150 10 10.43 -0.43 54.0% 4 7 9 10 12 15 17
IBA Akureyri 1150 10 12.11 -2.11 28.0% 5 8 10 12 14 16 18
Fram Reykjavik 1109 12 10.16 +1.84 87.0% 5 6 9 10 12 14 15
IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1102 9 10.21 -1.21 40.0% 5 7 8 10 12 14 15
Keflavik IF 964 4 7.43 -3.43 9.0% 3 4 6 7 9 11 13

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 4.5% * Slight Edge: 4.5% to 11% * Clear Edge: 11% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+13.33%
Clear Edge
40.00%33.33%26.67%
Elo Value
Home Edge: 46.60 Elo pts.
299 Elo
0.003 goals per Elo point
0800
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.40 goals
Neutral
-2+0.16+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd * Longshot: 4th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.07 * Tight Race: 0.07 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.33 * Runaway: 0.33 and up.
Title-Race Openness
4.0
Wide Open
12346
Champion Preseason Odds
20%
KR Reykjavik, 2nd of 6
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.30/gm
Comfortable
00.180.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 1.9 * Some Luck: 1.9 to 2.85 * Lucky: 2.85 to 3.81 * Wild Swing: 3.81 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.05 * Close: 1.05 to 1.57 * Off: 1.57 to 2.1 * Way Off: 2.1 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 6 * As Expected: 6 to 9.6 * Several Outliers: 9.6 to 13.2 * Many Outliers: 13.2 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
2.88 points
Lucky
02.386
Average Finish Error
Expected
2.00
Off
01.313
Biggest Overachiever
Expected
98.00%
KR Reykjavik
5091.67%100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
9.00%
Keflavik IF
08.33%50
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 6
Minimal Outliers
00.66

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.16 * Even: 0.16 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.65 * Strong Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Wide Separation: 1.85 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 63% * Slight Edge: 63% to 69% * Clear Edge: 69% to 75.5% * Wide Edge: 75.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 80.5% * Clear Edge: 80.5% to 88.5% * Strong Edge: 88.5% to 94% * Dominant: 94% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 55% * Some Drama: 55% to 61% * Frequent: 61% to 65% * Very Frequent: 65% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 14.5% * Occasional: 14.5% to 18% * Frequent: 18% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.18
Even
00.160.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 73.78
1.41
Moderate Separation
0.71.351.652.5
Interquartile Edge
57%
Even
50%63%69%75.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
76%
Even
50%76%100%
Close Games
Expected
57%
Some Drama
0%55%100%
Blowouts
Expected
20%
Frequent
0%21%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.28 * Slight Separation: 0.28 to 0.36 * Notable Separation: 0.36 to 0.41 * Lopsided: 0.41 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.33 * Some Carryover: 0.33 to 0.59 * Strong Carryover: 0.59 to 0.75 * Near-Lock: 0.75 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24.5% * Upset-Prone: 24.5% to 29% * Very Upset-Prone: 29% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 16% * As Expected: 16% to 21.5% * Shaky Favorites: 21.5% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.66
Coin-Flip
00.632
Matchup Imbalance
0.35
Slight Separation
00.280.360.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.31
Wilder Than Modeled
01.002
Repeatability
-0.41
Weak Carryover
00.330.590.751
Upset Rate
Expected
23%
As Expected
0%21%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
18%
As Expected
0%18%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.3 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.3 to 0.45 * Above Noise: 0.45 to 0.61 * Well Above Noise: 0.61 and up.
Probability calibration
0.66
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.96
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.265
Well Within Noise
00.3030.8

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456
KR Reykjavik20.00%13.00%15.00%17.00%20.00%15.00%
Fram Reykjavik10.00%20.00%30.00%15.00%16.00%9.00%
Valur Reykjavik17.00%17.00%21.00%23.00%15.00%7.00%
IBA Akureyri39.00%27.00%14.00%11.00%6.00%3.00%
IBV Vestmannaeyjar13.00%18.00%15.00%24.00%18.00%12.00%
Keflavik IF1.00%5.00%5.00%10.00%25.00%54.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
IBA Akureyri 97.00% 3.00%
Valur Reykjavik 93.00% 7.00%
Fram Reykjavik 91.00% 9.00%
IBV Vestmannaeyjar 88.00% 12.00%
KR Reykjavik 85.00% 15.00%
Keflavik IF 46.00% 54.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1968-05-25 Valur Reykjavik W 3-140.5 1157 1136 44.20% 34.98% 20.81%+0.23 +13.6 2
1968-05-25 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar L 1-340.5 1136 1157 20.81% 34.98% 44.20%-0.23 -13.6 0
1968-05-25 IBA Akureyri L 0-141.8 1069 1138 32.52% 35.33% 32.15%-0.07 -11.2 0
1968-05-25 @ Keflavik IF W 1-041.8 1138 1069 32.15% 35.33% 32.52%+0.07 +11.2 2
1968-06-04 KR Reykjavik D 2-253.4 1077 1060 43.64% 35.04% 21.32%+0.21 -1.1 1
1968-06-04 @ Fram Reykjavik D 2-253.4 1060 1077 21.32% 35.04% 43.64%-0.21 +1.0 1
1968-06-09 IBA Akureyri L 0-335.8 1061 1149 29.87% 35.23% 34.90%-0.14 -29.1 1
1968-06-09 @ KR Reykjavik W 3-035.8 1149 1061 34.90% 35.23% 29.87%+0.14 +29.1 4
1968-06-10 Valur Reykjavik L 0-336.8 1058 1122 33.10% 35.34% 31.56%-0.06 -31.2 0
1968-06-10 @ Keflavik IF W 3-036.8 1122 1058 31.56% 35.34% 33.10%+0.06 +31.2 2
1968-06-13 Fram Reykjavik L 2-453.9 1171 1076 51.95% 33.74% 14.31%+0.47 -23.6 2
1968-06-13 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 4-253.9 1076 1171 14.31% 33.74% 51.95%-0.47 +23.6 3
1968-06-13 KR Reykjavik D 2-254.0 1154 1032 54.34% 33.11% 12.55%+0.56 -2.2 3
1968-06-13 @ Valur Reykjavik D 2-254.0 1032 1154 12.55% 33.11% 54.34%-0.56 +2.2 2
1968-06-18 IBA Akureyri D 1-147.9 1099 1178 31.11% 35.28% 33.61%-0.11 +0.1 4
1968-06-18 @ Fram Reykjavik D 1-147.9 1178 1099 33.61% 35.28% 31.11%+0.11 -0.1 5
1968-06-23 Valur Reykjavik W 2-037.8 1100 1151 34.87% 35.36% 29.77%-0.02 +20.0 6
1968-06-23 @ Fram Reykjavik L 0-237.8 1151 1100 29.77% 35.36% 34.87%+0.02 -20.0 3
1968-06-25 IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 3-032.8 1178 1147 45.25% 34.88% 19.88%+0.26 +22.1 7
1968-06-25 @ IBA Akureyri L 0-332.8 1147 1178 19.88% 34.88% 45.25%-0.26 -22.1 2
1968-06-25 Keflavik IF W 6-034.6 1034 1027 42.56% 35.12% 22.31%+0.18 +45.8 4
1968-06-25 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-634.6 1027 1034 22.31% 35.12% 42.56%-0.18 -45.8 0
1968-07-06 KR Reykjavik L 0-340.7 1125 1080 46.88% 34.67% 18.45%+0.31 -40.5 2
1968-07-06 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 3-040.7 1080 1125 18.45% 34.67% 46.88%-0.31 +40.5 6
1968-07-06 Fram Reykjavik D 1-148.0 981 1120 23.55% 34.67% 41.78%-0.31 +1.1 1
1968-07-06 @ Keflavik IF D 1-148.0 1120 981 41.78% 34.67% 23.55%+0.31 -1.1 7
1968-07-07 IBA Akureyri D 1-148.0 1131 1200 32.52% 35.33% 32.15%-0.07 -0.0 4
1968-07-07 @ Valur Reykjavik D 1-148.0 1200 1131 32.15% 35.33% 32.52%+0.07 +0.0 8
1968-07-14 Keflavik IF D 1-149.4 1200 982 61.97% 30.12% 7.91%+0.88 -3.9 9
1968-07-14 @ IBA Akureyri D 1-149.4 982 1200 7.91% 30.12% 61.97%-0.88 +3.9 2
1968-07-14 IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 4-137.5 1131 1085 47.02% 34.65% 18.33%+0.31 +17.5 6
1968-07-14 @ Valur Reykjavik L 1-437.5 1085 1131 18.33% 34.65% 47.02%-0.31 -17.5 2
1968-07-15 Fram Reykjavik W 3-141.1 1121 1118 41.90% 35.17% 22.93%+0.16 +14.6 8
1968-07-15 @ KR Reykjavik L 1-341.1 1118 1121 22.93% 35.17% 41.90%-0.16 -14.6 7
1968-07-25 Keflavik IF W 2-033.0 1067 986 50.61% 34.04% 15.35%+0.43 +12.5 4
1968-07-25 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar L 0-233.0 986 1067 15.35% 34.04% 50.61%-0.43 -12.5 2
1968-07-28 Valur Reykjavik D 2-253.6 1196 1149 47.09% 34.64% 18.26%+0.31 -1.4 10
1968-07-28 @ IBA Akureyri D 2-253.6 1149 1196 18.26% 34.64% 47.09%-0.31 +1.4 7
1968-07-29 Keflavik IF W 2-139.7 1104 973 55.12% 32.88% 12.00%+0.59 +5.1 9
1968-07-29 @ Fram Reykjavik L 1-239.7 973 1104 12.00% 32.88% 55.12%-0.59 -5.1 2
1968-08-06 IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 4-350.6 1135 1080 47.97% 34.51% 17.52%+0.34 +6.4 10
1968-08-06 @ KR Reykjavik L 3-450.6 1080 1135 17.52% 34.51% 47.97%-0.34 -6.4 4
1968-08-11 KR Reykjavik L 2-356.4 1195 1142 47.73% 34.55% 17.72%+0.33 -13.4 10
1968-08-11 @ IBA Akureyri W 3-256.4 1142 1195 17.72% 34.55% 47.73%-0.33 +13.4 12
1968-08-12 Keflavik IF D 0-045.3 1150 968 59.29% 31.35% 9.36%+0.76 -4.0 8
1968-08-12 @ Valur Reykjavik D 0-045.3 968 1150 9.36% 31.35% 59.29%-0.76 +4.0 3
1968-08-14 IBV Vestmannaeyjar D 0-044.3 1109 1073 45.81% 34.81% 19.38%+0.27 -1.9 10
1968-08-14 @ Fram Reykjavik D 0-044.3 1073 1109 19.38% 34.81% 45.81%-0.27 +1.9 5
1968-08-18 Fram Reykjavik L 1-251.5 1181 1107 49.90% 34.18% 15.92%+0.40 -14.7 10
1968-08-18 @ IBA Akureyri W 2-151.5 1107 1181 15.92% 34.18% 49.90%-0.40 +14.7 12
1968-08-18 IBV Vestmannaeyjar L 0-140.3 972 1075 27.87% 35.10% 37.02%-0.19 -10.1 3
1968-08-18 @ Keflavik IF W 1-040.3 1075 972 37.02% 35.10% 27.87%+0.19 +10.1 7
1968-08-19 Valur Reykjavik W 2-143.5 1155 1146 42.70% 35.11% 22.19%+0.19 +8.2 14
1968-08-19 @ KR Reykjavik L 1-243.5 1146 1155 22.19% 35.11% 42.70%-0.19 -8.2 8
1968-08-24 IBA Akureyri W 4-249.0 1085 1167 30.77% 35.27% 33.96%-0.12 +16.9 9
1968-08-24 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar L 2-449.0 1167 1085 33.96% 35.27% 30.77%+0.12 -16.9 10
1968-08-25 KR Reykjavik D 2-253.9 962 1163 17.43% 33.45% 49.11%-0.52 +1.5 4
1968-08-25 @ Keflavik IF D 2-253.9 1163 962 49.11% 33.45% 17.43%+0.52 -1.6 15
1968-08-26 Fram Reykjavik W 4-245.1 1138 1122 43.60% 35.04% 21.36%+0.21 +12.4 10
1968-08-26 @ Valur Reykjavik L 2-445.1 1122 1138 21.36% 35.04% 43.60%-0.21 -12.4 12

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1968-06-13 14.31% Fram Reykjavik 1076 4 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1171 2
2 1968-08-18 15.92% Fram Reykjavik 1107 2 @ IBA Akureyri 1181 1
3 1968-08-11 17.72% KR Reykjavik 1142 3 @ IBA Akureyri 1195 2
4 1968-07-06 18.45% KR Reykjavik 1080 3 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1125 0
5 1968-08-24 30.77% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1085 4 IBA Akureyri 1167 2
6 1968-06-10 31.56% Valur Reykjavik 1122 3 @ Keflavik IF 1058 0
7 1968-05-25 32.15% IBA Akureyri 1138 1 @ Keflavik IF 1069 0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1968-06-25 45.82 @ KR Reykjavik 6 1034 42.56% Keflavik IF 0 1027 22.31% 35.12%
2 1968-07-06 40.50 KR Reykjavik 3 1080 18.45% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1125 46.88% 34.67%
3 1968-06-10 31.17 Valur Reykjavik 3 1122 31.56% @ Keflavik IF 0 1058 33.10% 35.34%
4 1968-06-09 29.12 IBA Akureyri 3 1149 34.90% @ KR Reykjavik 0 1061 29.87% 35.23%
5 1968-06-13 23.61 Fram Reykjavik 4 1076 14.31% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1171 51.95% 33.74%
6 1968-06-25 22.06 @ IBA Akureyri 3 1178 45.25% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1147 19.88% 34.88%
7 1968-06-23 20.03 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1100 34.87% Valur Reykjavik 0 1151 29.77% 35.36%
8 1968-07-14 17.52 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1131 47.02% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1085 18.33% 34.65%
9 1968-08-24 16.90 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 1085 30.77% IBA Akureyri 2 1167 33.96% 35.27%
10 1968-08-18 14.72 Fram Reykjavik 2 1107 15.92% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1181 49.90% 34.18%
11 1968-07-15 14.56 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1121 41.90% Fram Reykjavik 1 1118 22.93% 35.17%
12 1968-05-25 13.60 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1157 44.20% Valur Reykjavik 1 1136 20.81% 34.98%
13 1968-08-11 13.43 KR Reykjavik 3 1142 17.72% @ IBA Akureyri 2 1195 47.73% 34.55%
14 1968-07-25 12.48 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1067 50.61% Keflavik IF 0 986 15.35% 34.04%
15 1968-08-26 12.39 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1138 43.60% Fram Reykjavik 2 1122 21.36% 35.04%
16 1968-05-25 11.25 IBA Akureyri 1 1138 32.15% @ Keflavik IF 0 1069 32.52% 35.33%
17 1968-08-18 10.14 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1075 37.02% @ Keflavik IF 0 972 27.87% 35.10%
18 1968-08-19 8.22 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1155 42.70% Valur Reykjavik 1 1146 22.19% 35.11%
19 1968-08-06 6.40 @ KR Reykjavik 4 1135 47.97% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1080 17.52% 34.51%
20 1968-07-29 5.07 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1104 55.12% Keflavik IF 1 973 12.00% 32.88%
21 1968-08-12 4.01 @ Valur Reykjavik 0 1150 59.29% Keflavik IF 0 968 9.36% 31.35%
22 1968-07-14 3.94 @ IBA Akureyri 1 1200 61.97% Keflavik IF 1 982 7.91% 30.12%
23 1968-06-13 2.17 @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1154 54.34% KR Reykjavik 2 1032 12.55% 33.11%
24 1968-08-14 1.91 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1109 45.81% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1073 19.38% 34.81%
25 1968-08-25 1.56 KR Reykjavik 2 1163 49.11% @ Keflavik IF 2 962 17.43% 33.45%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1968-08-11 56.4 KR Reykjavik 3 1142 17.72% @ IBA Akureyri 2 1195 47.73% 34.55%
2 1968-06-13 54.0 @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1154 54.34% KR Reykjavik 2 1032 12.55% 33.11%
3 1968-06-13 53.9 Fram Reykjavik 4 1076 14.31% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1171 51.95% 33.74%
4 1968-08-25 53.9 @ Keflavik IF 2 962 17.43% KR Reykjavik 2 1163 49.11% 33.45%
5 1968-07-28 53.6 @ IBA Akureyri 2 1196 47.09% Valur Reykjavik 2 1149 18.26% 34.64%
6 1968-06-04 53.4 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1077 43.64% KR Reykjavik 2 1060 21.32% 35.04%
7 1968-08-18 51.5 Fram Reykjavik 2 1107 15.92% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1181 49.90% 34.18%
8 1968-08-06 50.6 @ KR Reykjavik 4 1135 47.97% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1080 17.52% 34.51%
9 1968-07-14 49.4 @ IBA Akureyri 1 1200 61.97% Keflavik IF 1 982 7.91% 30.12%
10 1968-08-24 49.0 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 1085 30.77% IBA Akureyri 2 1167 33.96% 35.27%
11 1968-07-06 48.0 @ Keflavik IF 1 981 23.55% Fram Reykjavik 1 1120 41.78% 34.67%
12 1968-07-07 48.0 @ Valur Reykjavik 1 1131 32.52% IBA Akureyri 1 1200 32.15% 35.33%
13 1968-06-18 47.9 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1099 31.11% IBA Akureyri 1 1178 33.61% 35.28%
14 1968-08-12 45.3 @ Valur Reykjavik 0 1150 59.29% Keflavik IF 0 968 9.36% 31.35%
15 1968-08-26 45.1 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1138 43.60% Fram Reykjavik 2 1122 21.36% 35.04%
16 1968-08-14 44.3 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1109 45.81% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1073 19.38% 34.81%
17 1968-08-19 43.5 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1155 42.70% Valur Reykjavik 1 1146 22.19% 35.11%
18 1968-05-25 41.8 IBA Akureyri 1 1138 32.15% @ Keflavik IF 0 1069 32.52% 35.33%
19 1968-07-15 41.1 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1121 41.90% Fram Reykjavik 1 1118 22.93% 35.17%
20 1968-07-06 40.7 KR Reykjavik 3 1080 18.45% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1125 46.88% 34.67%
21 1968-05-25 40.5 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1157 44.20% Valur Reykjavik 1 1136 20.81% 34.98%
22 1968-08-18 40.3 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1075 37.02% @ Keflavik IF 0 972 27.87% 35.10%
23 1968-07-29 39.7 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1104 55.12% Keflavik IF 1 973 12.00% 32.88%
24 1968-06-23 37.8 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1100 34.87% Valur Reykjavik 0 1151 29.77% 35.36%
25 1968-07-14 37.5 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1131 47.02% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1085 18.33% 34.65%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1968-06-25 32.8 @ IBA Akureyri 3 1178 45.25% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1147 19.88% 34.88%
2 1968-07-25 33.0 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1067 50.61% Keflavik IF 0 986 15.35% 34.04%
3 1968-06-25 34.6 @ KR Reykjavik 6 1034 42.56% Keflavik IF 0 1027 22.31% 35.12%
4 1968-06-09 35.8 IBA Akureyri 3 1149 34.90% @ KR Reykjavik 0 1061 29.87% 35.23%
5 1968-06-10 36.8 Valur Reykjavik 3 1122 31.56% @ Keflavik IF 0 1058 33.10% 35.34%
6 1968-07-14 37.5 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1131 47.02% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1085 18.33% 34.65%
7 1968-06-23 37.8 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1100 34.87% Valur Reykjavik 0 1151 29.77% 35.36%
8 1968-07-29 39.7 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1104 55.12% Keflavik IF 1 973 12.00% 32.88%
9 1968-08-18 40.3 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1075 37.02% @ Keflavik IF 0 972 27.87% 35.10%
10 1968-05-25 40.5 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1157 44.20% Valur Reykjavik 1 1136 20.81% 34.98%
11 1968-07-06 40.7 KR Reykjavik 3 1080 18.45% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1125 46.88% 34.67%
12 1968-07-15 41.1 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1121 41.90% Fram Reykjavik 1 1118 22.93% 35.17%
13 1968-05-25 41.8 IBA Akureyri 1 1138 32.15% @ Keflavik IF 0 1069 32.52% 35.33%
14 1968-08-19 43.5 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1155 42.70% Valur Reykjavik 1 1146 22.19% 35.11%
15 1968-08-14 44.3 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1109 45.81% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1073 19.38% 34.81%
16 1968-08-26 45.1 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1138 43.60% Fram Reykjavik 2 1122 21.36% 35.04%
17 1968-08-12 45.3 @ Valur Reykjavik 0 1150 59.29% Keflavik IF 0 968 9.36% 31.35%
18 1968-06-18 47.9 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1099 31.11% IBA Akureyri 1 1178 33.61% 35.28%
19 1968-07-06 48.0 @ Keflavik IF 1 981 23.55% Fram Reykjavik 1 1120 41.78% 34.67%
20 1968-07-07 48.0 @ Valur Reykjavik 1 1131 32.52% IBA Akureyri 1 1200 32.15% 35.33%
21 1968-08-24 49.0 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 1085 30.77% IBA Akureyri 2 1167 33.96% 35.27%
22 1968-07-14 49.4 @ IBA Akureyri 1 1200 61.97% Keflavik IF 1 982 7.91% 30.12%
23 1968-08-06 50.6 @ KR Reykjavik 4 1135 47.97% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1080 17.52% 34.51%
24 1968-08-18 51.5 Fram Reykjavik 2 1107 15.92% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1181 49.90% 34.18%
25 1968-06-04 53.4 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1077 43.64% KR Reykjavik 2 1060 21.32% 35.04%