Home / Leagues / Iceland / Úrvalsdeild / 1969
‹ ›

1969 Úrvalsdeild Season

42 games

Final

Champion

Keflavik IF

15 points · 2nd Title

Last Title: 1964.0

Relegated

IBA Akureyri

9 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Keflavik IF

2.91 points above expected

15 points · 12.09 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

IBA Akureyri

3.38 points below expected

9 points · 12.38 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Keflavik IF Champion 12 7 1 4 15 20 12 +8 12.09 +2.91
2 IA Akranes 12 6 2 4 14 22 19 +3 11.28 +2.72
3 KR Reykjavik 12 4 4 4 12 24 20 +4 11.95 +0.05
4 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 12 3 6 3 12 20 20 0 12.41 -0.41
5 Valur Reykjavik 12 4 4 4 12 18 19 -1 12.56 -0.56
6 Fram Reykjavik 12 2 6 4 10 8 16 -8 11.33 -1.33
7 IBA Akureyri Relegated 12 2 5 5 9 12 18 -6 12.38 -3.38

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Keflavik IF 15 12.09 +2.91
2 IA Akranes 14 11.28 +2.72
3 KR Reykjavik 12 11.95 +0.05
4 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 12 12.41 -0.41
5 Valur Reykjavik 12 12.56 -0.56

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 IBA Akureyri 9 12.38 -3.38
2 Fram Reykjavik 10 11.33 -1.33
3 Valur Reykjavik 12 12.56 -0.56
4 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 12 12.41 -0.41
5 KR Reykjavik 12 11.95 +0.05

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Keflavik IF 4 Jun 8 – Jul 5 1 in 453
2 IA Akranes 3 May 31 – Jun 14 1 in 133
3 Fram Reykjavik 1 Jul 5 – Jul 5 1 in 14
4 KR Reykjavik 1 Jun 4 – Jun 4 1 in 5
5 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 May 31 – May 31 1 in 4

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IA Akranes 3 Jul 5 – Aug 10 1 in 48
2 Fram Reykjavik 2 Jun 4 – Jun 30 1 in 23
3 IBA Akureyri 2 Sep 7 – Sep 14 1 in 14
4 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 Jun 14 – Jun 14 1 in 7
5 Keflavik IF 2 Aug 21 – Sep 13 1 in 6

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IA Akranes 4 May 26 – Jun 14 1 in 12
2 Keflavik IF 4 Jun 8 – Jul 5 1 in 9
3 Fram Reykjavik 4 Aug 24 – Sep 14 1 in 6
4 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 Jul 5 – Aug 14 1 in 5
5 Valur Reykjavik 4 Jun 29 – Aug 17 1 in 5

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 Jun 7 – Jul 10 1 in 9
2 IBA Akureyri 5 Jun 1 – Jul 10 1 in 7
3 Fram Reykjavik 4 May 27 – Jun 30 1 in 7
4 IA Akranes 4 Jul 5 – Aug 24 1 in 5
5 Keflavik IF 2 May 26 – May 31 1 in 3

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Keflavik IF 1156 15 +10 6 5.6 +0.4
IA Akranes 1094 14 +10 7 4.8 +2.2
KR Reykjavik 1157 12 +21 6 4.9 +1.1
IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1137 12 -7 4 4.9 -0.9
Valur Reykjavik 1137 12 -18 3 5.0 -2.0
Fram Reykjavik 1098 10 +0 5 4.6 +0.4
IBA Akureyri 1111 9 -23 3 5.0 -2.0

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team FR IA IA IV KR KI VR
Fram Reykjavik —
1-1-0
2.62
0-2-0
2.48
0-2-0
2.40
0-1-1
2.82
0-0-2
2.39
1-0-1
2.44
IA Akranes
0-1-1
2.69
 —
2-0-0
2.30
2-0-0
2.33
1-0-1
2.23
1-1-0
2.30
0-0-2
2.39
IBA Akureyri
0-2-0
2.83
0-0-2
3.01
 —
0-1-1
2.58
1-0-1
2.99
1-0-1
2.57
0-2-0
2.64
IBV Vestmannaeyjar
0-2-0
2.91
0-0-2
2.98
1-1-0
2.73
 —
0-2-0
2.64
2-0-0
2.73
0-1-1
2.61
KR Reykjavik
1-1-0
2.49
1-0-1
3.08
1-0-1
2.31
0-2-0
2.66
 —
0-0-2
2.81
1-1-0
2.53
Keflavik IF
2-0-0
2.92
0-1-1
3.01
1-0-1
2.74
0-0-2
2.57
2-0-0
2.52
 —
2-0-0
2.54
Valur Reykjavik
1-0-1
2.86
2-0-0
2.92
0-2-0
2.67
1-1-0
2.69
0-1-1
2.77
0-0-2
2.77
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.53 +2.7
Allowed 0.11 -2.4
Differential 0.83 +3.4

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.76%4.76%7.14%2.38%1.19%—20.24%
14.76%21.43%7.14%3.57%—1.19%38.10%
27.14%7.14%4.76%3.57%1.19%1.19%25.00%
32.38%3.57%3.57%2.38%——11.90%
41.19%—1.19%———2.38%
5+—1.19%1.19%———2.38%
Total20.24%38.10%25.00%11.90%2.38%2.38%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.48 1.48 +0.00
SD 1.24 1.24 1.76
CV 0.84 0.84 —
Max 6 6 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 42

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
016.67%8.33%16.67%———41.67%
116.67%25.00%———8.33%50.00%
2——8.33%———8.33%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total33.33%33.33%25.00%——8.33%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.67 1.33 -0.67
SD 0.65 1.67 1.67
CV 0.98 1.25 —
Max 2 6 +1
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—8.33%—8.33%——16.67%
1—8.33%—8.33%——16.67%
2—25.00%8.33%8.33%——41.67%
3—8.33%8.33%———16.67%
48.33%—————8.33%
5+———————
Total8.33%50.00%16.67%25.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.83 1.58 +0.25
SD 1.19 1.00 1.86
CV 0.65 0.63 —
Max 4 3 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——16.67%———16.67%
18.33%33.33%16.67%8.33%——66.67%
2—8.33%8.33%———16.67%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total8.33%41.67%41.67%8.33%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.00 1.50 -0.50
SD 0.60 0.80 1.09
CV 0.60 0.53 —
Max 2 3 +1
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
08.33%—————8.33%
1—33.33%8.33%8.33%——50.00%
2—8.33%—8.33%——16.67%
3——8.33%8.33%——16.67%
4——8.33%———8.33%
5+———————
Total8.33%41.67%25.00%25.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.67 1.67 +0.00
SD 1.15 0.98 1.04
CV 0.69 0.59 —
Max 4 3 +2
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
08.33%——8.33%8.33%—25.00%
1—16.67%16.67%———33.33%
28.33%—————8.33%
3—8.33%—8.33%——16.67%
4———————
5+—8.33%8.33%———16.67%
Total16.67%33.33%25.00%16.67%8.33%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.00 1.67 +0.33
SD 2.13 1.23 2.61
CV 1.07 0.74 —
Max 6 4 +5
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—8.33%————8.33%
18.33%8.33%8.33%———25.00%
233.33%8.33%—8.33%8.33%—58.33%
38.33%—————8.33%
4———————
5+———————
Total50.00%25.00%8.33%8.33%8.33%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.67 1.00 +0.67
SD 0.78 1.35 1.61
CV 0.47 1.35 —
Max 3 4 +3
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 12

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—8.33%16.67%———25.00%
1—25.00%————25.00%
28.33%—8.33%——8.33%25.00%
38.33%8.33%8.33%———25.00%
4———————
5+———————
Total16.67%41.67%33.33%——8.33%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 1.58 -0.08
SD 1.17 1.56 1.98
CV 0.78 0.99 —
Max 3 6 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 12

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
KR Reykjavik 1157 12 11.95 +0.05 55.0% 6 7 10 12 14 16 17
Keflavik IF 1156 15 12.09 +2.91 90.0% 6 7 10 12 14 16 19
Valur Reykjavik 1137 12 12.56 -0.56 53.0% 7 9 11 12 14 17 17
IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1137 12 12.41 -0.41 52.0% 6 8 10 12 14 17 18
IBA Akureyri 1111 9 12.38 -3.38 17.0% 5 8 11 12 14 17 18
Fram Reykjavik 1098 10 11.33 -1.33 40.0% 4 7 9 12 13 15 17
IA Akranes 1094 14 11.28 +2.72 87.0% 5 7 9 11 14 16 17

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 4.5% * Slight Edge: 4.5% to 11% * Clear Edge: 11% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+17.50%
Strong Edge
42.50%32.50%25.00%
Elo Value
Home Edge: 61.43 Elo pts.
1032 Elo
0.001 goals per Elo point
03000
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.35 goals
Neutral
-2+0.06+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 4th * Longshot: 5th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.07 * Tight Race: 0.07 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.33 * Runaway: 0.33 and up.
Title-Race Openness
6.4
Wide Open
12347
Champion Preseason Odds
21%
Keflavik IF, 1st of 7
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.08/gm
Tight Race
00.130.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.11 * Some Luck: 2.11 to 3.16 * Lucky: 3.16 to 4.22 * Wild Swing: 4.22 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.64 * Close: 1.64 to 2.45 * Off: 2.45 to 3.27 * Way Off: 3.27 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 7 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 7 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 7 * As Expected: 7 to 11.2 * Several Outliers: 11.2 to 15.4 * Many Outliers: 15.4 and up.
Unexpected Relegations
Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 0.75 * A Surprise: 0.75 to 1.2 * Several Surprises: 1.2 to 1.65 * Many Surprises: 1.65 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
2.05 points
As Expected
02.647
Average Finish Error
Expected
2.86
Off
02.045
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 92.86%
90.00%
Keflavik IF
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
17.00%
IBA Akureyri
07.14%50
Season Outliers
Expected
0 of 7
Minimal Outliers
00.77
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
1 of 1
A Surprise
00.81

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.16 * Even: 0.16 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.65 * Strong Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Wide Separation: 1.85 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 63% * Slight Edge: 63% to 69% * Clear Edge: 69% to 75.5% * Wide Edge: 75.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 80.5% * Clear Edge: 80.5% to 88.5% * Strong Edge: 88.5% to 94% * Dominant: 94% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 55% * Some Drama: 55% to 61% * Frequent: 61% to 65% * Very Frequent: 65% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 14.5% * Occasional: 14.5% to 18% * Frequent: 18% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.09
Balanced
00.160.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 26.14
0.74
Coin-Flip Parity
0.71.351.652.5
Interquartile Edge
56%
Even
50%63%69%75.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
59%
Even
50%61%100%
Close Games
Expected
64%
Frequent
0%60%100%
Blowouts
Expected
12%
Rare
0%16%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.28 * Slight Separation: 0.28 to 0.36 * Notable Separation: 0.36 to 0.41 * Lopsided: 0.41 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.33 * Some Carryover: 0.33 to 0.59 * Strong Carryover: 0.59 to 0.75 * Near-Lock: 0.75 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24.5% * Upset-Prone: 24.5% to 29% * Very Upset-Prone: 29% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 16% * As Expected: 16% to 21.5% * Shaky Favorites: 21.5% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.67
Coin-Flip
00.632
Matchup Imbalance
0.39
Notable Separation
00.280.360.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.58
Very Predictable
01.002
Repeatability
-0.56
Weak Carryover
00.330.590.751
Upset Rate
Expected
24%
As Expected
0%20%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
26%
Very Shaky
0%19%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.22 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.22 to 0.32 * Above Noise: 0.32 to 0.43 * Well Above Noise: 0.43 and up.
Probability calibration
0.19
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
-2.14
Overconfident
01.005.07765
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.142
Well Within Noise
00.2150.5

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team1234567
Keflavik IF21.00%14.00%14.00%15.00%14.00%14.00%8.00%
IA Akranes11.00%10.00%14.00%13.00%15.00%17.00%20.00%
KR Reykjavik15.00%18.00%14.00%9.00%15.00%13.00%16.00%
IBV Vestmannaeyjar17.00%15.00%15.00%17.00%14.00%10.00%12.00%
Valur Reykjavik18.00%15.00%13.00%20.00%19.00%8.00%7.00%
Fram Reykjavik7.00%10.00%13.00%14.00%13.00%18.00%25.00%
IBA Akureyri11.00%18.00%17.00%12.00%10.00%20.00%12.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
Valur Reykjavik 93.00% 7.00%
Keflavik IF 92.00% 8.00%
IBA Akureyri 88.00% 12.00%
IBV Vestmannaeyjar 88.00% 12.00%
KR Reykjavik 84.00% 16.00%
IA Akranes 80.00% 20.00%
Fram Reykjavik 75.00% 25.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1969-05-26 IA Akranes D 1-149.1 1102 1065 50.09% 34.03% 15.87%+0.15 -1.4 1
1969-05-26 @ Keflavik IF D 1-149.1 1065 1102 15.87% 34.03% 50.09%-0.15 +1.4 1
1969-05-27 Fram Reykjavik W 2-033.7 1148 1138 47.28% 34.60% 18.13%+0.11 +8.6 2
1969-05-27 @ Valur Reykjavik L 0-233.7 1138 1148 18.13% 34.60% 47.28%-0.11 -8.6 0
1969-05-31 KR Reykjavik W 4-035.2 1066 1151 35.62% 35.35% 29.03%-0.04 +22.6 3
1969-05-31 @ IA Akranes L 0-435.2 1151 1066 29.03% 35.35% 35.62%+0.04 -22.6 0
1969-05-31 IBV Vestmannaeyjar L 2-450.8 1100 1136 41.92% 35.22% 22.86%+0.04 -11.9 1
1969-05-31 @ Keflavik IF W 4-250.8 1136 1100 22.86% 35.22% 41.92%-0.04 +11.9 2
1969-06-01 IBA Akureyri D 1-148.9 1130 1148 44.00% 35.04% 20.96%+0.07 -0.9 1
1969-06-01 @ Fram Reykjavik D 1-148.9 1148 1130 20.96% 35.04% 44.00%-0.07 +0.9 1
1969-06-04 KR Reykjavik L 1-643.9 1129 1129 46.15% 34.77% 19.08%+0.10 -32.2 1
1969-06-04 @ Fram Reykjavik W 6-143.9 1129 1129 19.08% 34.77% 46.15%-0.10 +32.2 2
1969-06-07 Valur Reykjavik D 1-148.9 1148 1157 45.16% 34.91% 19.93%+0.08 -1.0 3
1969-06-07 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar D 1-148.9 1157 1148 19.93% 34.91% 45.16%-0.08 +1.0 3
1969-06-08 IA Akranes L 1-252.4 1149 1089 52.42% 33.43% 14.15%+0.19 -9.3 1
1969-06-08 @ IBA Akureyri W 2-152.4 1089 1149 14.15% 33.43% 52.42%-0.19 +9.3 5
1969-06-08 Keflavik IF L 0-342.0 1161 1089 53.59% 33.07% 13.34%+0.21 -27.4 2
1969-06-08 @ KR Reykjavik W 3-042.0 1089 1161 13.34% 33.07% 53.59%-0.21 +27.4 3
1969-06-12 Keflavik IF L 0-243.3 1158 1116 50.63% 33.91% 15.47%+0.16 -18.0 3
1969-06-12 @ Valur Reykjavik W 2-043.3 1116 1158 15.47% 33.91% 50.63%-0.16 +18.0 5
1969-06-14 IA Akranes L 2-357.3 1147 1098 51.34% 33.73% 14.94%+0.17 -8.6 3
1969-06-14 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 3-257.3 1098 1147 14.94% 33.73% 51.34%-0.17 +8.6 7
1969-06-29 Valur Reykjavik D 2-254.6 1140 1140 46.13% 34.78% 19.10%+0.10 -0.8 2
1969-06-29 @ IBA Akureyri D 2-254.6 1140 1140 19.10% 34.78% 46.13%-0.10 +0.8 4
1969-06-30 Keflavik IF L 0-144.5 1097 1134 41.75% 35.23% 23.02%+0.04 -8.2 1
1969-06-30 @ Fram Reykjavik W 1-044.5 1134 1097 23.02% 35.23% 41.75%-0.04 +8.1 7
1969-07-05 Fram Reykjavik L 0-146.2 1107 1088 48.17% 34.44% 17.39%+0.12 -9.2 7
1969-07-05 @ IA Akranes W 1-046.2 1088 1107 17.39% 34.44% 48.17%-0.12 +9.2 3
1969-07-05 IBV Vestmannaeyjar D 1-148.8 1098 1139 41.28% 35.26% 23.47%+0.03 -0.7 4
1969-07-05 @ Fram Reykjavik D 1-148.8 1139 1098 23.47% 35.26% 41.28%-0.03 +0.7 4
1969-07-05 Valur Reykjavik L 2-354.7 1098 1141 41.05% 35.27% 23.68%+0.03 -7.2 7
1969-07-05 @ IA Akranes W 3-254.7 1141 1098 23.68% 35.27% 41.05%-0.03 +7.2 6
1969-07-05 IBA Akureyri W 2-034.0 1142 1139 46.47% 34.72% 18.80%+0.10 +8.8 9
1969-07-05 @ Keflavik IF L 0-234.0 1139 1142 18.80% 34.72% 46.47%-0.10 -8.8 2
1969-07-10 KR Reykjavik D 1-149.0 1148 1133 47.74% 34.52% 17.74%+0.12 -1.2 7
1969-07-10 @ Valur Reykjavik D 1-149.0 1133 1148 17.74% 34.52% 47.74%-0.12 +1.2 3
1969-07-10 IBA Akureyri D 1-149.0 1139 1130 47.16% 34.62% 18.23%+0.11 -1.1 5
1969-07-10 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar D 1-149.0 1130 1139 18.23% 34.62% 47.16%-0.11 +1.2 3
1969-07-13 KR Reykjavik W 2-142.9 1131 1135 45.78% 34.83% 19.40%+0.09 +4.5 5
1969-07-13 @ IBA Akureyri L 1-242.9 1135 1131 19.40% 34.83% 45.78%-0.09 -4.5 3
1969-07-30 Keflavik IF W 3-248.4 1138 1151 44.71% 34.96% 20.33%+0.08 +4.4 7
1969-07-30 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar L 2-348.4 1151 1138 20.33% 34.96% 44.71%-0.08 -4.4 9
1969-08-10 Fram Reykjavik D 1-149.2 1136 1097 50.32% 33.98% 15.70%+0.16 -1.4 6
1969-08-10 @ IBA Akureyri D 1-149.2 1097 1136 15.70% 33.98% 50.32%-0.16 +1.4 5
1969-08-10 IA Akranes W 3-138.4 1130 1091 50.37% 33.97% 15.66%+0.16 +6.6 5
1969-08-10 @ KR Reykjavik L 1-338.4 1091 1130 15.66% 33.97% 50.37%-0.16 -6.6 7
1969-08-13 Fram Reykjavik W 2-032.5 1146 1098 51.24% 33.75% 15.01%+0.17 +7.4 11
1969-08-13 @ Keflavik IF L 0-232.5 1098 1146 15.01% 33.75% 51.24%-0.17 -7.4 5
1969-08-14 IBV Vestmannaeyjar D 1-148.9 1137 1143 45.47% 34.87% 19.67%+0.09 -1.0 6
1969-08-14 @ KR Reykjavik D 1-148.9 1143 1137 19.67% 34.87% 45.47%-0.09 +1.0 8
1969-08-17 IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 3-139.6 1147 1144 46.49% 34.72% 18.79%+0.10 +7.6 9
1969-08-17 @ Valur Reykjavik L 1-339.6 1144 1147 18.79% 34.72% 46.49%-0.10 -7.6 8
1969-08-18 KR Reykjavik W 2-142.2 1154 1136 48.13% 34.45% 17.43%+0.12 +4.2 13
1969-08-18 @ Keflavik IF L 1-242.2 1136 1154 17.43% 34.45% 48.13%-0.12 -4.2 6
1969-08-21 Keflavik IF W 1-038.4 1135 1158 43.43% 35.10% 21.47%+0.06 +5.2 8
1969-08-21 @ IBA Akureyri L 0-138.4 1158 1135 21.47% 35.10% 43.43%-0.06 -5.2 13
1969-08-24 IA Akranes D 2-254.5 1091 1084 46.91% 34.66% 18.43%+0.11 -0.8 6
1969-08-24 @ Fram Reykjavik D 2-254.5 1084 1091 18.43% 34.66% 46.91%-0.11 +0.8 8
1969-08-25 Valur Reykjavik W 6-238.9 1132 1154 43.51% 35.09% 21.41%+0.06 +13.0 8
1969-08-25 @ KR Reykjavik L 2-638.9 1154 1132 21.41% 35.09% 43.51%-0.06 -13.0 9
1969-08-27 IBA Akureyri W 3-141.6 1085 1140 39.56% 35.33% 25.11%+0.01 +9.4 10
1969-08-27 @ IA Akranes L 1-341.6 1140 1085 25.11% 35.33% 39.56%-0.01 -9.4 8
1969-08-28 Valur Reykjavik W 1-039.4 1090 1141 40.01% 35.32% 24.68%+0.02 +5.7 8
1969-08-28 @ Fram Reykjavik L 0-139.4 1141 1090 24.68% 35.32% 40.01%-0.02 -5.7 9
1969-09-03 IBA Akureyri D 1-149.0 1136 1130 46.75% 34.68% 18.57%+0.10 -1.1 10
1969-09-03 @ Valur Reykjavik D 1-149.0 1130 1136 18.57% 34.68% 46.75%-0.10 +1.1 9
1969-09-04 KR Reykjavik D 3-358.7 1136 1145 45.18% 34.90% 19.92%+0.08 -0.6 9
1969-09-04 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar D 3-358.7 1145 1136 19.92% 34.90% 45.18%-0.08 +0.6 9
1969-09-06 IA Akranes W 3-030.8 1135 1094 50.47% 33.95% 15.59%+0.16 +11.1 12
1969-09-06 @ Valur Reykjavik L 0-330.8 1094 1135 15.59% 33.95% 50.47%-0.16 -11.1 10
1969-09-07 IBA Akureyri W 2-037.6 1145 1131 34.28% 35.35% 30.37%+0.02 +12.3 11
1969-09-07 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-237.6 1131 1145 30.37% 35.35% 34.28%-0.02 -12.3 9
1969-09-09 Fram Reykjavik D 0-044.9 1136 1096 50.39% 33.96% 15.65%+0.16 -1.6 10
1969-09-09 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar D 0-044.9 1096 1136 15.65% 33.96% 50.39%-0.16 +1.6 9
1969-09-13 Keflavik IF W 2-145.4 1083 1153 37.64% 35.37% 27.00%-0.01 +5.7 12
1969-09-13 @ IA Akranes L 1-245.4 1153 1083 27.00% 35.37% 37.64%+0.01 -5.7 13
1969-09-14 Fram Reykjavik D 0-044.6 1158 1097 40.59% 34.95% 24.46%+0.09 -0.7 12
1969-09-14 @ KR Reykjavik D 0-044.6 1097 1158 24.46% 34.95% 40.59%-0.09 +0.7 10
1969-09-14 IBV Vestmannaeyjar L 1-250.5 1119 1134 44.45% 34.99% 20.56%+0.07 -8.1 9
1969-09-14 @ IBA Akureyri W 2-150.5 1134 1119 20.56% 34.99% 44.45%-0.07 +8.1 12
1969-09-20 IBV Vestmannaeyjar W 2-144.7 1089 1142 39.78% 35.33% 24.90%+0.01 +5.4 14
1969-09-20 @ IA Akranes L 1-244.7 1142 1089 24.90% 35.33% 39.78%-0.01 -5.4 12
1969-09-21 Valur Reykjavik W 2-034.0 1147 1146 46.30% 34.75% 18.95%+0.10 +8.9 15
1969-09-21 @ Keflavik IF L 0-234.0 1146 1147 18.95% 34.75% 46.30%-0.10 -8.9 12

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1969-06-08 13.34% Keflavik IF 1089 3 @ KR Reykjavik 1161 0
2 1969-06-08 14.15% IA Akranes 1089 2 @ IBA Akureyri 1149 1
3 1969-06-14 14.94% IA Akranes 1098 3 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1147 2
4 1969-06-12 15.47% Keflavik IF 1116 2 @ Valur Reykjavik 1158 0
5 1969-07-05 17.39% Fram Reykjavik 1088 1 @ IA Akranes 1107 0
6 1969-06-04 19.08% KR Reykjavik 1129 6 @ Fram Reykjavik 1129 1
7 1969-09-14 20.56% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1134 2 @ IBA Akureyri 1119 1
8 1969-05-31 22.86% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1136 4 @ Keflavik IF 1100 2
9 1969-06-30 23.02% Keflavik IF 1134 1 @ Fram Reykjavik 1097 0
10 1969-07-05 23.68% Valur Reykjavik 1141 3 @ IA Akranes 1098 2

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1969-06-04 32.24 KR Reykjavik 6 1129 19.08% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1129 46.15% 34.77%
2 1969-06-08 27.44 Keflavik IF 3 1089 13.34% @ KR Reykjavik 0 1161 53.59% 33.07%
3 1969-05-31 22.62 @ IA Akranes 4 1066 35.62% KR Reykjavik 0 1151 29.03% 35.35%
4 1969-06-12 18.00 Keflavik IF 2 1116 15.47% @ Valur Reykjavik 0 1158 50.63% 33.91%
5 1969-08-25 13.01 @ KR Reykjavik 6 1132 43.51% Valur Reykjavik 2 1154 21.41% 35.09%
6 1969-09-07 12.28 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1145 34.28% IBA Akureyri 0 1131 30.37% 35.35%
7 1969-05-31 11.94 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 1136 22.86% @ Keflavik IF 2 1100 41.92% 35.22%
8 1969-09-06 11.06 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1135 50.47% IA Akranes 0 1094 15.59% 33.95%
9 1969-08-27 9.38 @ IA Akranes 3 1085 39.56% IBA Akureyri 1 1140 25.11% 35.33%
10 1969-06-08 9.27 IA Akranes 2 1089 14.15% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1149 52.42% 33.43%
11 1969-07-05 9.15 Fram Reykjavik 1 1088 17.39% @ IA Akranes 0 1107 48.17% 34.44%
12 1969-09-21 8.87 @ Keflavik IF 2 1147 46.30% Valur Reykjavik 0 1146 18.95% 34.75%
13 1969-07-05 8.82 @ Keflavik IF 2 1142 46.47% IBA Akureyri 0 1139 18.80% 34.72%
14 1969-06-14 8.64 IA Akranes 3 1098 14.94% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1147 51.34% 33.73%
15 1969-05-27 8.58 @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1148 47.28% Fram Reykjavik 0 1138 18.13% 34.60%
16 1969-06-30 8.15 Keflavik IF 1 1134 23.02% @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1097 41.75% 35.23%
17 1969-09-14 8.07 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1134 20.56% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1119 44.45% 34.99%
18 1969-08-17 7.64 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1147 46.49% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1144 18.79% 34.72%
19 1969-08-13 7.38 @ Keflavik IF 2 1146 51.24% Fram Reykjavik 0 1098 15.01% 33.75%
20 1969-07-05 7.20 Valur Reykjavik 3 1141 23.68% @ IA Akranes 2 1098 41.05% 35.27%
21 1969-08-10 6.61 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1130 50.37% IA Akranes 1 1091 15.66% 33.97%
22 1969-08-28 5.68 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1090 40.01% Valur Reykjavik 0 1141 24.68% 35.32%
23 1969-09-13 5.68 @ IA Akranes 2 1083 37.64% Keflavik IF 1 1153 27.00% 35.37%
24 1969-09-20 5.39 @ IA Akranes 2 1089 39.78% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1142 24.90% 35.33%
25 1969-08-21 5.16 @ IBA Akureyri 1 1135 43.43% Keflavik IF 0 1158 21.47% 35.10%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1969-09-04 58.7 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1136 45.18% KR Reykjavik 3 1145 19.92% 34.90%
2 1969-06-14 57.3 IA Akranes 3 1098 14.94% @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1147 51.34% 33.73%
3 1969-07-05 54.7 Valur Reykjavik 3 1141 23.68% @ IA Akranes 2 1098 41.05% 35.27%
4 1969-06-29 54.6 @ IBA Akureyri 2 1140 46.13% Valur Reykjavik 2 1140 19.10% 34.78%
5 1969-08-24 54.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 1091 46.91% IA Akranes 2 1084 18.43% 34.66%
6 1969-06-08 52.4 IA Akranes 2 1089 14.15% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1149 52.42% 33.43%
7 1969-05-31 50.8 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 4 1136 22.86% @ Keflavik IF 2 1100 41.92% 35.22%
8 1969-09-14 50.5 IBV Vestmannaeyjar 2 1134 20.56% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1119 44.45% 34.99%
9 1969-08-10 49.2 @ IBA Akureyri 1 1136 50.32% Fram Reykjavik 1 1097 15.70% 33.98%
10 1969-05-26 49.1 @ Keflavik IF 1 1102 50.09% IA Akranes 1 1065 15.87% 34.03%
11 1969-07-10 49.0 @ Valur Reykjavik 1 1148 47.74% KR Reykjavik 1 1133 17.74% 34.52%
12 1969-07-10 49.0 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1139 47.16% IBA Akureyri 1 1130 18.23% 34.62%
13 1969-09-03 49.0 @ Valur Reykjavik 1 1136 46.75% IBA Akureyri 1 1130 18.57% 34.68%
14 1969-06-01 48.9 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1130 44.00% IBA Akureyri 1 1148 20.96% 35.04%
15 1969-06-07 48.9 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1148 45.16% Valur Reykjavik 1 1157 19.93% 34.91%
16 1969-08-14 48.9 @ KR Reykjavik 1 1137 45.47% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1143 19.67% 34.87%
17 1969-07-05 48.8 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1098 41.28% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1139 23.47% 35.26%
18 1969-07-30 48.4 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1138 44.71% Keflavik IF 2 1151 20.33% 34.96%
19 1969-07-05 46.2 Fram Reykjavik 1 1088 17.39% @ IA Akranes 0 1107 48.17% 34.44%
20 1969-09-13 45.4 @ IA Akranes 2 1083 37.64% Keflavik IF 1 1153 27.00% 35.37%
21 1969-09-09 44.9 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1136 50.39% Fram Reykjavik 0 1096 15.65% 33.96%
22 1969-09-20 44.7 @ IA Akranes 2 1089 39.78% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1142 24.90% 35.33%
23 1969-09-14 44.6 @ KR Reykjavik 0 1158 40.59% Fram Reykjavik 0 1097 24.46% 34.95%
24 1969-06-30 44.5 Keflavik IF 1 1134 23.02% @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1097 41.75% 35.23%
25 1969-06-04 43.9 KR Reykjavik 6 1129 19.08% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1129 46.15% 34.77%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1969-09-06 30.8 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1135 50.47% IA Akranes 0 1094 15.59% 33.95%
2 1969-08-13 32.5 @ Keflavik IF 2 1146 51.24% Fram Reykjavik 0 1098 15.01% 33.75%
3 1969-05-27 33.7 @ Valur Reykjavik 2 1148 47.28% Fram Reykjavik 0 1138 18.13% 34.60%
4 1969-07-05 34.0 @ Keflavik IF 2 1142 46.47% IBA Akureyri 0 1139 18.80% 34.72%
5 1969-09-21 34.0 @ Keflavik IF 2 1147 46.30% Valur Reykjavik 0 1146 18.95% 34.75%
6 1969-05-31 35.2 @ IA Akranes 4 1066 35.62% KR Reykjavik 0 1151 29.03% 35.35%
7 1969-09-07 37.6 @ KR Reykjavik 2 1145 34.28% IBA Akureyri 0 1131 30.37% 35.35%
8 1969-08-10 38.4 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1130 50.37% IA Akranes 1 1091 15.66% 33.97%
9 1969-08-21 38.4 @ IBA Akureyri 1 1135 43.43% Keflavik IF 0 1158 21.47% 35.10%
10 1969-08-25 38.9 @ KR Reykjavik 6 1132 43.51% Valur Reykjavik 2 1154 21.41% 35.09%
11 1969-08-28 39.4 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1090 40.01% Valur Reykjavik 0 1141 24.68% 35.32%
12 1969-08-17 39.6 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1147 46.49% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1144 18.79% 34.72%
13 1969-08-27 41.6 @ IA Akranes 3 1085 39.56% IBA Akureyri 1 1140 25.11% 35.33%
14 1969-06-08 42.0 Keflavik IF 3 1089 13.34% @ KR Reykjavik 0 1161 53.59% 33.07%
15 1969-08-18 42.2 @ Keflavik IF 2 1154 48.13% KR Reykjavik 1 1136 17.43% 34.45%
16 1969-07-13 42.9 @ IBA Akureyri 2 1131 45.78% KR Reykjavik 1 1135 19.40% 34.83%
17 1969-06-12 43.3 Keflavik IF 2 1116 15.47% @ Valur Reykjavik 0 1158 50.63% 33.91%
18 1969-06-04 43.9 KR Reykjavik 6 1129 19.08% @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1129 46.15% 34.77%
19 1969-06-30 44.5 Keflavik IF 1 1134 23.02% @ Fram Reykjavik 0 1097 41.75% 35.23%
20 1969-09-14 44.6 @ KR Reykjavik 0 1158 40.59% Fram Reykjavik 0 1097 24.46% 34.95%
21 1969-09-20 44.7 @ IA Akranes 2 1089 39.78% IBV Vestmannaeyjar 1 1142 24.90% 35.33%
22 1969-09-09 44.9 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 0 1136 50.39% Fram Reykjavik 0 1096 15.65% 33.96%
23 1969-09-13 45.4 @ IA Akranes 2 1083 37.64% Keflavik IF 1 1153 27.00% 35.37%
24 1969-07-05 46.2 Fram Reykjavik 1 1088 17.39% @ IA Akranes 0 1107 48.17% 34.44%
25 1969-07-30 48.4 @ IBV Vestmannaeyjar 3 1138 44.71% Keflavik IF 2 1151 20.33% 34.96%