2006-07 Luxembourg National Division Season

182 games

Final

Champion

F91 Dudelange

65 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Differdange 03

16.96 points above expected

48 points · 31.04 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Mamer 32

10.83 points below expected

10 points · 20.83 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	F91 Dudelange	26	21	2	3	65	71	20	+51	54.23	+10.77
2	Etzella Ettelbruck	26	16	4	6	52	60	30	+30	48.08	+3.92
3	Differdange 03	26	14	6	6	48	71	41	+30	31.04	+16.96
4	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	26	11	8	7	41	52	35	+17	42.00	-1.00
5	Grevenmacher	26	11	8	7	41	43	34	+9	43.50	-2.50
6	Swift Hesperange	26	10	9	7	39	39	28	+11	39.42	-0.42
7	Progres Niedercorn	26	10	5	11	35	53	61	-8	33.31	+1.69
8	UN Kaerjeng	26	10	4	12	34	38	51	-13	31.84	+2.16
9	Jeunesse Esch	26	9	5	12	32	29	34	-5	39.10	-7.10
10	CS Petange	26	8	8	10	32	29	38	-9	34.51	-2.51
11	Wiltz 71	26	9	4	13	31	31	38	-7	34.53	-3.53
12	Victoria Rosport	26	7	6	13	27	28	47	-19	31.51	-4.51
13	Mondercange	26	4	6	16	18	23	59	-36	22.30	-4.30
14	Mamer 32	26	1	7	18	10	19	70	-51	20.83	-10.83

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Differdange 03	48	31.04	+16.96
2	F91 Dudelange	65	54.23	+10.77
3	Etzella Ettelbruck	52	48.08	+3.92
4	UN Kaerjeng	34	31.84	+2.16
5	Progres Niedercorn	35	33.31	+1.69

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Mamer 32	10	20.83	-10.83
2	Jeunesse Esch	32	39.10	-7.10
3	Victoria Rosport	27	31.51	-4.51
4	Mondercange	18	22.30	-4.30
5	Wiltz 71	31	34.53	-3.53

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	UN Kaerjeng	4	Mar 18 – Apr 27	1 in 312
2	Differdange 03	3	Aug 26 – Sep 16	1 in 120
3	F91 Dudelange	10	Oct 1 – Mar 11	1 in 81
4	Mondercange	2	Sep 17 – Sep 20	1 in 58
5	Progres Niedercorn	3	Oct 15 – Nov 12	1 in 48

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Wiltz 71	6	Aug 26 – Sep 30	1 in 223
2	Mamer 32	7	Aug 6 – Sep 20	1 in 90
3	Progres Niedercorn	4	Apr 29 – May 13	1 in 80
4	Mondercange	7	Sep 24 – Nov 26	1 in 63
5	Jeunesse Esch	4	Mar 4 – Apr 1	1 in 42

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Differdange 03	8	Aug 26 – Oct 22	1 in 444
2	Swift Hesperange	12	Aug 6 – Nov 12	1 in 124
3	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	11	Aug 6 – Oct 22	1 in 108
4	Wiltz 71	7	Nov 12 – Mar 11	1 in 42
5	Mamer 32	3	May 9 – May 20	1 in 23

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Grevenmacher	5	Nov 26 – Mar 11	1 in 39
2	Mamer 32	18	Oct 1 – May 20	1 in 23
3	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	4	Nov 26 – Mar 4	1 in 17
4	CS Petange	6	Sep 17 – Oct 22	1 in 16
5	Wiltz 71	6	Aug 26 – Sep 30	1 in 14

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team	Elo	Season Pts	Elo Δ (5)	Points (5)	Expected (5)	Actual − Exp
F91 Dudelange	1347	65	+41	15	11.3	+3.7
Etzella Ettelbruck	1226	52	+52	13	9.8	+3.2
Differdange 03	1126	48	+40	9	8.5	+0.5
Grevenmacher	1084	41	+6	8	7.4	+0.6
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1094	41	+10	6	8.0	-2.0
Swift Hesperange	1090	39	-30	4	8.7	-4.7
Progres Niedercorn	976	35	-78	3	6.8	-3.8
UN Kaerjeng	991	34	-19	9	6.7	+2.3
Jeunesse Esch	1052	32	+53	10	4.9	+5.1
CS Petange	982	32	-57	5	6.9	-1.9
Wiltz 71	1044	31	+0	4	6.5	-2.5
Victoria Rosport	945	27	-28	4	5.5	-1.5
Mondercange	867	18	+6	4	3.3	+0.7
Mamer 32	779	10	+4	4	3.0	+1.0

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Team	CP	D0	EE	FD	GRE	JE	M3	MON	PN	RFUL	SH	UK	VR	W7
CS Petange	—	1-0-1 3.01	0-1-1 1.81	0-0-2 1.57	0-1-1 1.93	1-0-1 2.57	1-1-0 3.64	1-1-0 3.93	1-1-0 2.98	0-0-2 2.37	1-1-0 2.38	0-2-0 3.32	1-0-1 3.33	1-0-1 2.70
Differdange 03	1-0-1 2.54	—	0-1-1 1.52	0-0-2 1.40	0-1-1 1.61	2-0-0 2.12	2-0-0 4.06	1-1-0 3.15	1-0-1 2.98	0-2-0 1.80	1-1-0 2.08	2-0-0 3.40	2-0-0 2.96	2-0-0 2.13
Etzella Ettelbruck	1-1-0 3.73	1-1-0 4.06	—	1-0-1 2.10	1-0-1 3.31	1-1-0 3.86	2-0-0 4.46	2-0-0 4.64	2-0-0 3.77	1-0-1 3.31	1-1-0 3.47	0-0-2 4.27	2-0-0 3.84	1-0-1 3.55
F91 Dudelange	2-0-0 3.99	2-0-0 4.17	1-0-1 3.43	—	1-1-0 3.71	2-0-0 4.13	2-0-0 4.74	2-0-0 4.90	2-0-0 4.39	0-1-1 3.91	2-0-0 4.10	2-0-0 4.35	1-0-1 4.57	2-0-0 4.46
Grevenmacher	1-1-0 3.61	1-1-0 3.98	1-0-1 2.22	0-1-1 1.84	—	1-1-0 3.36	2-0-0 4.38	1-1-0 4.02	1-0-1 3.39	2-0-0 2.44	0-2-0 3.35	0-1-1 3.74	0-0-2 4.00	1-0-1 3.74
Jeunesse Esch	1-0-1 2.95	0-0-2 3.45	0-1-1 1.69	0-0-2 1.46	0-1-1 2.17	—	2-0-0 4.17	0-1-1 4.23	1-0-1 3.11	1-1-0 2.78	0-1-1 2.52	2-0-0 2.95	1-0-1 3.16	1-0-1 2.96
Mamer 32	0-1-1 1.90	0-0-2 1.53	0-0-2 1.16	0-0-2 0.91	0-0-2 1.23	0-0-2 1.40	—	1-1-0 2.29	0-1-1 2.04	0-0-2 1.22	0-1-1 0.96	0-0-2 1.97	0-2-0 1.64	0-1-1 1.53
Mondercange	0-1-1 1.62	0-1-1 2.38	0-0-2 0.98	0-0-2 0.76	0-1-1 1.55	1-1-0 1.35	0-1-1 3.24	—	1-0-1 1.68	0-0-2 1.20	0-0-2 1.40	0-0-2 1.83	2-0-0 1.64	0-1-1 1.78
Progres Niedercorn	0-1-1 2.54	1-0-1 2.56	0-0-2 1.78	0-0-2 1.20	1-0-1 2.16	1-0-1 2.42	1-1-0 3.50	1-0-1 3.86	—	1-1-0 1.90	1-1-0 2.05	2-0-0 2.87	1-1-0 2.94	0-0-2 2.85
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2-0-0 3.16	0-2-0 3.74	1-0-1 2.22	1-1-0 1.64	0-0-2 3.09	0-1-1 2.76	2-0-0 4.36	2-0-0 4.39	0-1-1 3.64	—	0-1-1 3.02	1-0-1 3.71	1-1-0 3.38	1-1-0 3.06
Swift Hesperange	0-1-1 3.15	0-1-1 3.46	0-1-1 2.07	0-0-2 1.46	0-2-0 2.18	1-1-0 3.00	1-1-0 4.66	2-0-0 4.17	0-1-1 3.48	1-1-0 2.50	—	1-0-1 3.29	2-0-0 3.71	2-0-0 3.30
UN Kaerjeng	0-2-0 2.21	0-0-2 2.14	2-0-0 1.31	0-0-2 1.25	1-1-0 1.80	0-0-2 2.57	2-0-0 3.57	2-0-0 3.72	0-0-2 2.65	1-0-1 1.83	1-0-1 2.24	—	0-1-1 2.63	1-0-1 2.75
Victoria Rosport	1-0-1 2.20	0-0-2 2.57	0-0-2 1.71	1-0-1 1.05	2-0-0 1.56	1-0-1 2.37	0-2-0 3.91	0-0-2 3.92	0-1-1 2.59	0-1-1 2.16	0-0-2 1.84	1-1-0 2.89	—	1-1-0 2.57
Wiltz 71	1-0-1 2.83	0-0-2 3.40	1-0-1 2.00	0-0-2 1.14	1-0-1 1.80	1-0-1 2.56	1-1-0 4.04	1-1-0 3.78	2-0-0 2.68	0-1-1 2.47	0-0-2 2.23	1-0-1 2.78	0-1-1 2.97	—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.81	+7.2
Allowed	0.64	-7.8
Differential	0.97	+5.0

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	4.95%	6.04%	8.52%	4.67%	2.47%	1.10%	27.75%
1	6.04%	8.24%	4.12%	3.30%	1.65%	2.20%	25.55%
2	8.52%	4.12%	8.24%	1.92%	0.82%	0.82%	24.45%
3	4.67%	3.30%	1.92%	1.10%	0.55%	—	11.54%
4	2.47%	1.65%	0.82%	0.55%	—	0.55%	6.04%
5+	1.10%	2.20%	0.82%	—	0.55%	—	4.67%
Total	27.75%	25.55%	24.45%	11.54%	6.04%	4.67%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.61	1.61	+0.00
SD	1.54	1.54	2.33
CV	0.95	0.95	—
Max	8	8	+8
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	—	3.85%	30.77%
1	15.38%	11.54%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	38.46%
2	—	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
3	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
4	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	26.92%	26.92%	30.77%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.12	1.46	-0.35
SD	1.03	1.30	1.81
CV	0.93	0.89	—
Max	4	5	+4
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
1	—	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	19.23%
2	—	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	—	19.23%
3	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
4	7.69%	3.85%	—	7.69%	—	3.85%	23.08%
5+	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	19.23%	38.46%	23.08%	11.54%	—	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.73	1.58	+1.15
SD	2.01	1.36	2.69
CV	0.74	0.86	—
Max	8	5	+8
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
1	3.85%	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	30.77%
2	19.23%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	34.62%
3	7.69%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
4	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	38.46%	26.92%	19.23%	11.54%	3.85%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.31	1.15	+1.15
SD	1.32	1.19	2.03
CV	0.57	1.03	—
Max	6	4	+6
Min	1	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	15.38%
1	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
2	23.08%	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	34.62%
3	11.54%	7.69%	—	—	—	—	19.23%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	19.23%
Total	46.15%	34.62%	15.38%	3.85%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.73	0.77	+1.96
SD	1.93	0.86	2.05
CV	0.71	1.12	—
Max	7	3	+6
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	—	11.54%	7.69%	—	—	26.92%
1	11.54%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	26.92%
2	7.69%	7.69%	11.54%	—	3.85%	—	30.77%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	—	—	—	—	3.85%	—	3.85%
Total	34.62%	23.08%	26.92%	7.69%	7.69%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.65	1.31	+0.35
SD	1.79	1.26	2.02
CV	1.08	0.96	—
Max	8	4	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	15.38%	15.38%	3.85%	—	—	38.46%
1	7.69%	11.54%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	30.77%
2	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	15.38%
3	—	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
4	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	23.08%	38.46%	26.92%	7.69%	3.85%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.12	1.31	-0.19
SD	1.18	1.05	1.63
CV	1.06	0.80	—
Max	4	4	+2
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	11.54%	11.54%	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	50.00%
1	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	—	3.85%	11.54%	30.77%
2	—	—	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	15.38%
3	—	—	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.69%	19.23%	26.92%	15.38%	15.38%	15.38%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	0.73	2.69	-1.96
SD	0.87	1.83	2.05
CV	1.20	0.68	—
Max	3	8	+1
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	7.69%	7.69%	11.54%	7.69%	—	42.31%
1	—	11.54%	—	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	34.62%
2	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
3	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	15.38%	23.08%	15.38%	26.92%	11.54%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	0.88	2.27	-1.38
SD	0.95	1.71	1.98
CV	1.08	0.75	—
Max	3	7	+2
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	—	3.85%	3.85%	23.08%
1	3.85%	—	—	7.69%	—	—	11.54%
2	7.69%	—	15.38%	—	3.85%	3.85%	30.77%
3	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
4	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	11.54%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	—	7.69%
Total	23.08%	15.38%	26.92%	7.69%	15.38%	11.54%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.04	2.35	-0.31
SD	1.56	2.19	2.60
CV	0.77	0.93	—
Max	5	8	+4
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
1	7.69%	15.38%	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	34.62%
2	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
3	11.54%	—	—	—	—	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	30.77%	30.77%	19.23%	11.54%	7.69%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.00	1.35	+0.65
SD	1.81	1.26	2.42
CV	0.91	0.94	—
Max	7	4	+5
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	11.54%	7.69%	—	—	—	23.08%
1	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	23.08%
2	15.38%	—	19.23%	3.85%	—	—	38.46%
3	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	34.62%	26.92%	34.62%	3.85%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.50	1.08	+0.42
SD	1.10	0.93	1.47
CV	0.74	0.87	—
Max	4	3	+3
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	—	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	—	34.62%
1	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
2	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	3.85%	23.08%
3	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	23.08%
4	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	26.92%	11.54%	34.62%	7.69%	11.54%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.46	1.96	-0.50
SD	1.30	1.78	2.34
CV	0.89	0.91	—
Max	4	7	+4
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	—	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	38.46%
1	7.69%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	26.92%
2	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	23.08%
3	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	30.77%	11.54%	26.92%	19.23%	3.85%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.08	1.81	-0.73
SD	1.06	1.65	2.18
CV	0.98	0.91	—
Max	3	6	+3
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	15.38%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	38.46%
1	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	—	3.85%	30.77%
2	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	15.38%
3	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
4	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	30.77%	30.77%	15.38%	19.23%	—	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.19	1.46	-0.27
SD	1.36	1.58	2.31
CV	1.14	1.08	—
Max	5	7	+4
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
F91 Dudelange	1347	65	54.23	+10.77	96.0%	40	44	50	54	58	65	68
Etzella Ettelbruck	1226	52	48.08	+3.92	72.0%	34	36	43	49	53	59	62
Differdange 03	1126	48	31.04	+16.96	100.0%	19	21	27	31	34	42	46
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1094	41	42.00	-1.00	46.0%	29	31	37	43	47	51	55
Swift Hesperange	1090	39	39.42	-0.42	50.0%	24	28	35	39	43	53	57
Grevenmacher	1084	41	43.50	-2.50	38.0%	31	34	38	43	47	53	62
Jeunesse Esch	1052	32	39.10	-7.10	20.0%	24	28	34	39	44	48	55
Wiltz 71	1044	31	34.53	-3.53	33.0%	21	25	31	34	38	46	50
UN Kaerjeng	991	34	31.84	+2.16	69.0%	13	21	27	32	36	44	49
CS Petange	982	32	34.51	-2.51	36.0%	21	24	31	34	39	44	49
Progres Niedercorn	976	35	33.31	+1.69	67.0%	16	24	29	33	37	45	48
Victoria Rosport	945	27	31.51	-4.51	30.0%	17	22	27	31	35	43	55
Mondercange	867	18	22.30	-4.30	27.0%	8	11	18	22	26	31	36
Mamer 32	779	10	20.83	-10.83	1.0%	10	12	16	21	24	31	36

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 7% * Slight Edge: 7% to 11.5% * Clear Edge: 11.5% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+12.64%

Clear Edge

45.05%22.53%32.42%

Elo Value

Home Edge: 44.14 Elo pts.

170 Elo

0.006 goals per Elo point

0500

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.34 goals

Neutral

-2+0.26+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin: Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.05 * Tight Race: 0.05 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.27 * Runaway: 0.27 and up.

Title-Race Openness

2.2

Top-Heavy

123410

Champion Preseason Odds

64%

F91 Dudelange, 1st of 14

LongshotFavorite

Title Margin

Expected

0.50/gm

Runaway

00.230.8/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 5.06 * Some Luck: 5.06 to 7.59 * Lucky: 7.59 to 10.12 * Wild Swing: 10.12 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.54 * Close: 1.54 to 2.31 * Off: 2.31 to 3.08 * Way Off: 3.08 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

6.86 points

Some Luck

06.3216

Average Finish Error

Expected

1.86

01.934

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 96.43%

100.00%

Differdange 03

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 3.57%

1.00%

Mamer 32

050

Season Outliers

Expected

3 of 14

Minimal Outliers

01.47

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.17 * Even: 0.17 to 0.19 * Top-Heavy: 0.19 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully: Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.65 * Moderate Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Strong Separation: 1.85 to 2.05 * Wide Separation: 2.05 and up.
Interquartile Edge: Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 68% * Slight Edge: 68% to 72.5% * Clear Edge: 72.5% to 78% * Wide Edge: 78% and up.
Best vs. Worst: Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 89.5% * Clear Edge: 89.5% to 92% * Strong Edge: 92% to 95% * Dominant: 95% and up.
Close Games: Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 49% * Some Drama: 49% to 53% * Frequent: 53% to 56% * Very Frequent: 56% and up.
Blowouts: Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 23% * Occasional: 23% to 26% * Frequent: 26% to 28% * Very Frequent: 28% and up.

Gini Index

0.20

Top-Heavy

00.170.5

Noll-Scully

Elo SD: 141.47

2.01

Strong Separation

11.651.852.052.5

Interquartile Edge

66%

Even

50%68%78%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline 95%

96%

Dominant

50%100%

Close Games

Expected

48%

Few

0%48%100%

Blowouts

Expected

26%

Frequent

0%28%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.35 * Slight Separation: 0.35 to 0.39 * Notable Separation: 0.39 to 0.44 * Lopsided: 0.44 and up.
Strangeness: How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.43 * Some Carryover: 0.43 to 0.62 * Strong Carryover: 0.62 to 0.73 * Near-Lock: 0.73 and up.
Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24% * Upset-Prone: 24% to 26.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 26.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 18% * As Expected: 18% to 20.5% * Shaky Favorites: 20.5% to 23.5% * Very Shaky: 23.5% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.60

Predictable

00.582

Matchup Imbalance

0.39

Notable Separation

00.350.5

Strangeness

Expected

1.25

Wilder Than Modeled

01.002

Repeatability

0.34

Weak Carryover

00.430.621

Upset Rate

Expected

25%

Upset-Prone

0%23%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

23%

Shaky Favorites

0%20%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.13 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.13 to 0.19 * Above Noise: 0.19 to 0.25 * Well Above Noise: 0.25 and up.

Probability calibration

0.10

Well Calibrated

0.010.050.10.51

Calibration slope

Ideal

0.79

Overconfident

0.51.001.5

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.086

Well Within Noise

00.1260.3

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
F91 Dudelange	64.00%	25.00%	6.00%	2.00%	3.00%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Etzella Ettelbruck	21.00%	31.00%	14.00%	15.00%	7.00%	4.00%	4.00%	3.00%	1.00%	—	—	—	—	—
Differdange 03	—	1.00%	2.00%	3.00%	2.00%	7.00%	8.00%	9.00%	14.00%	16.00%	11.00%	12.00%	13.00%	2.00%
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3.00%	13.00%	20.00%	20.00%	8.00%	9.00%	11.00%	6.00%	3.00%	2.00%	5.00%	—	—	—
Grevenmacher	7.00%	15.00%	22.00%	7.00%	20.00%	15.00%	5.00%	3.00%	4.00%	1.00%	1.00%	—	—	—
Swift Hesperange	3.00%	4.00%	12.00%	13.00%	14.00%	19.00%	7.00%	9.00%	5.00%	8.00%	5.00%	1.00%	—	—
Progres Niedercorn	—	—	4.00%	9.00%	5.00%	4.00%	10.00%	15.00%	10.00%	14.00%	13.00%	10.00%	5.00%	1.00%
UN Kaerjeng	—	3.00%	—	3.00%	4.00%	4.00%	8.00%	12.00%	20.00%	9.00%	12.00%	20.00%	3.00%	2.00%
Jeunesse Esch	2.00%	5.00%	7.00%	16.00%	16.00%	12.00%	12.00%	6.00%	11.00%	7.00%	3.00%	1.00%	2.00%	—
CS Petange	—	1.00%	2.00%	6.00%	11.00%	9.00%	15.00%	11.00%	7.00%	15.00%	11.00%	7.00%	3.00%	2.00%
Wiltz 71	—	1.00%	7.00%	3.00%	7.00%	11.00%	11.00%	15.00%	12.00%	14.00%	9.00%	6.00%	3.00%	1.00%
Victoria Rosport	—	1.00%	4.00%	3.00%	3.00%	6.00%	8.00%	8.00%	9.00%	12.00%	15.00%	19.00%	9.00%	3.00%
Mondercange	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2.00%	3.00%	1.00%	10.00%	18.00%	30.00%	36.00%
Mamer 32	—	—	—	—	—	—	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%	5.00%	6.00%	32.00%	53.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team	Same level	Qualified for relegation playoff	Direct relegation
Etzella Ettelbruck	100%	—	—
F91 Dudelange	100%	—	—
Grevenmacher	100%	—	—
Racing FC Union Luxembourg	100%	—	—
Swift Hesperange	99.00%	1.00%	—
Jeunesse Esch	97.00%	1.00%	2.00%
Wiltz 71	90.00%	6.00%	4.00%
CS Petange	88.00%	7.00%	5.00%
UN Kaerjeng	75.00%	20.00%	5.00%
Progres Niedercorn	84.00%	10.00%	6.00%
Victoria Rosport	69.00%	19.00%	12.00%
Differdange 03	73.00%	12.00%	15.00%
Mondercange	16.00%	18.00%	66.00%
Mamer 32	9.00%	6.00%	85.00%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
2006-08-06	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 3-2	52.1	1057	1115	36.06%	23.88%	40.06%	-0.08	+9.9	3
2006-08-06	@ Wiltz 71	L 2-3	52.1	1115	1057	40.06%	23.88%	36.06%	+0.08	-9.9	0
2006-08-06	F91 Dudelange	W 3-0	43.6	1008	1238	17.19%	21.90%	60.91%	-1.09	+43.5	3
2006-08-06	@ Victoria Rosport	L 0-3	43.6	1238	1008	60.91%	21.90%	17.19%	+1.09	-43.5	0
2006-08-06	Grevenmacher	L 0-4	32.1	978	1121	25.46%	23.31%	51.23%	-0.58	-27.6	0
2006-08-06	@ Mondercange	W 4-0	32.1	1121	978	51.23%	23.31%	25.46%	+0.58	+27.6	3
2006-08-06	Mamer 32	W 4-0	33.2	1047	1021	47.68%	23.59%	28.73%	+0.41	+30.6	3
2006-08-06	@ CS Petange	L 0-4	33.2	1021	1047	28.73%	23.59%	47.68%	-0.41	-30.6	0
2006-08-06	Progres Niedercorn	W 4-3	57.5	836	951	28.65%	23.59%	47.76%	-0.41	+11.2	3
2006-08-06	@ Differdange 03	L 3-4	57.5	951	836	47.76%	23.59%	28.65%	+0.41	-11.2	0
2006-08-06	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.1	1127	1035	55.67%	22.80%	21.54%	+0.80	-2.1	1
2006-08-06	@ Jeunesse Esch	D 1-1	53.1	1035	1127	21.54%	22.80%	55.67%	-0.80	+2.0	1
2006-08-06	UN Kaerjeng	W 2-0	37.3	1037	1030	45.27%	23.73%	31.01%	+0.30	+17.1	3
2006-08-06	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	37.3	1030	1037	31.01%	23.73%	45.27%	-0.30	-17.1	0
2006-08-12	Differdange 03	W 5-1	30.4	1105	848	70.78%	19.11%	10.11%	+1.77	+9.5	3
2006-08-12	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-5	30.4	848	1105	10.11%	19.11%	70.78%	-1.77	-9.5	3
2006-08-12	Jeunesse Esch	W 2-1	44.1	1148	1125	47.33%	23.62%	29.06%	+0.40	+8.1	6
2006-08-12	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-2	44.1	1125	1148	29.06%	23.62%	47.33%	-0.40	-8.1	1
2006-08-12	Mamer 32	W 5-1	31.7	1195	991	66.52%	20.52%	12.96%	+1.46	+12.3	3
2006-08-12	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-5	31.7	991	1195	12.96%	20.52%	66.52%	-1.46	-12.3	0
2006-08-12	Swift Hesperange	D 2-2	57.8	940	1054	28.73%	23.59%	47.68%	-0.41	+0.8	1
2006-08-12	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 2-2	57.8	1054	940	47.68%	23.59%	28.73%	+0.41	-0.8	4
2006-08-12	Wiltz 71	W 3-0	36.6	1037	1067	40.13%	23.88%	35.99%	+0.09	+28.0	4
2006-08-12	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	36.6	1067	1037	35.99%	23.88%	40.13%	-0.09	-28.0	3
2006-08-13	Mondercange	D 1-1	53.3	1078	951	59.42%	22.19%	18.39%	+1.01	-2.5	4
2006-08-13	@ CS Petange	D 1-1	53.3	951	1078	18.39%	22.19%	59.42%	-1.01	+2.5	1
2006-08-13	Victoria Rosport	D 0-0	49.1	1012	1051	38.82%	23.89%	37.30%	+0.03	-0.1	1
2006-08-13	@ UN Kaerjeng	D 0-0	49.1	1051	1012	37.30%	23.89%	38.82%	-0.03	+0.1	4
2006-08-20	Differdange 03	W 2-0	28.4	1156	838	74.98%	17.40%	7.62%	+2.13	+4.4	9
2006-08-20	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-2	28.4	838	1156	7.62%	17.40%	74.98%	-2.13	-4.4	3
2006-08-20	F91 Dudelange	L 2-5	39.5	1012	1207	20.21%	22.57%	57.23%	-0.88	-12.6	1
2006-08-20	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 5-2	39.5	1207	1012	57.23%	22.57%	20.21%	+0.88	+12.6	6
2006-08-20	Jeunesse Esch	W 1-0	42.2	1075	1117	38.41%	23.89%	37.70%	+0.01	+10.6	7
2006-08-20	@ CS Petange	L 0-1	42.2	1117	1075	37.70%	23.89%	38.41%	-0.01	-10.6	1
2006-08-20	Mamer 32	W 5-1	39.9	941	979	38.99%	23.89%	37.12%	+0.04	+31.2	4
2006-08-20	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 1-5	39.9	979	941	37.12%	23.89%	38.99%	-0.04	-31.2	0
2006-08-20	Swift Hesperange	D 2-2	57.8	1065	1053	45.83%	23.70%	30.47%	+0.33	-0.7	5
2006-08-20	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 2-2	57.8	1053	1065	30.47%	23.70%	45.83%	-0.33	+0.6	5
2006-08-20	Victoria Rosport	W 3-0	33.0	1115	1051	52.36%	23.20%	24.44%	+0.63	+20.4	6
2006-08-20	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-3	33.0	1051	1115	24.44%	23.20%	52.36%	-0.63	-20.4	4
2006-08-20	Wiltz 71	L 1-5	38.4	953	1039	32.33%	23.78%	43.89%	-0.24	-28.0	1
2006-08-20	@ Mondercange	W 5-1	38.4	1039	953	43.89%	23.78%	32.33%	+0.24	+28.0	6
2006-08-26	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-4	30.6	947	1135	20.83%	22.68%	56.50%	-0.84	-23.2	0
2006-08-26	@ Mamer 32	W 4-0	30.6	1135	947	56.50%	22.68%	20.83%	+0.84	+23.2	9
2006-08-26	Grevenmacher	D 2-2	57.8	1054	1161	29.63%	23.65%	46.72%	-0.37	+0.7	6
2006-08-26	@ Swift Hesperange	D 2-2	57.8	1161	1054	46.72%	23.65%	29.63%	+0.37	-0.7	10
2006-08-26	Jeunesse Esch	L 1-3	44.6	1067	1106	38.71%	23.89%	37.40%	+0.03	-17.6	6
2006-08-26	@ Wiltz 71	W 3-1	44.6	1106	1067	37.40%	23.89%	38.71%	-0.03	+17.6	4
2006-08-26	Mondercange	W 4-0	38.0	834	925	31.56%	23.75%	44.68%	-0.28	+43.3	6
2006-08-26	@ Differdange 03	L 0-4	38.0	925	834	44.68%	23.75%	31.56%	+0.28	-43.3	1
2006-08-26	Progres Niedercorn	W 7-2	31.1	1219	972	70.02%	19.39%	10.59%	+1.71	+10.2	9
2006-08-26	@ F91 Dudelange	L 2-7	31.1	972	1219	10.59%	19.39%	70.02%	-1.71	-10.2	4
2006-08-26	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-6	39.6	1031	1065	39.55%	23.88%	36.57%	+0.06	-40.1	4
2006-08-26	@ Victoria Rosport	W 6-1	39.6	1065	1031	36.57%	23.88%	39.55%	-0.06	+40.1	8
2006-08-27	CS Petange	D 0-0	49.1	1000	1086	32.25%	23.78%	43.97%	-0.25	+0.8	2
2006-08-27	@ UN Kaerjeng	D 0-0	49.1	1086	1000	43.97%	23.78%	32.25%	+0.25	-0.7	8
2006-09-09	UN Kaerjeng	W 4-0	35.8	962	1000	38.86%	23.89%	37.26%	+0.03	+37.5	7
2006-09-09	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 0-4	35.8	1000	962	37.26%	23.89%	38.86%	-0.03	-37.5	2
2006-09-10	Differdange 03	L 1-2	55.0	1124	877	70.00%	19.40%	10.61%	+1.71	-16.9	4
2006-09-10	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 2-1	55.0	877	1124	10.61%	19.40%	70.00%	-1.71	+16.9	9
2006-09-10	F91 Dudelange	W 2-0	40.8	1158	1230	34.25%	23.84%	41.91%	-0.16	+21.7	12
2006-09-10	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-2	40.8	1230	1158	41.91%	23.84%	34.25%	+0.16	-21.7	9
2006-09-10	Mamer 32	W 1-0	34.4	1105	924	64.52%	21.07%	14.41%	+1.32	+4.6	11
2006-09-10	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	34.4	924	1105	14.41%	21.07%	64.52%	-1.32	-4.6	0
2006-09-10	Swift Hesperange	L 0-3	32.2	882	1055	22.26%	22.91%	54.83%	-0.76	-18.8	1
2006-09-10	@ Mondercange	W 3-0	32.2	1055	882	54.83%	22.91%	22.26%	+0.76	+18.9	9
2006-09-10	Victoria Rosport	L 0-3	44.1	1160	991	63.51%	21.32%	15.17%	+1.25	-45.2	10
2006-09-10	@ Grevenmacher	W 3-0	44.1	991	1160	15.17%	21.32%	63.51%	-1.25	+45.2	7
2006-09-10	Wiltz 71	W 2-1	43.5	1085	1049	48.97%	23.50%	27.53%	+0.47	+7.8	11
2006-09-10	@ CS Petange	L 1-2	43.5	1049	1085	27.53%	23.50%	48.97%	-0.47	-7.8	6
2006-09-16	Wiltz 71	W 3-0	41.2	894	1042	24.89%	23.25%	51.86%	-0.61	+37.6	12
2006-09-16	@ Differdange 03	L 0-3	41.2	1042	894	51.86%	23.25%	24.89%	+0.61	-37.6	6
2006-09-17	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 3-1	50.3	963	1180	18.24%	22.16%	59.60%	-1.02	+25.4	5
2006-09-17	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 1-3	50.3	1180	963	59.60%	22.16%	18.24%	+1.02	-25.4	12
2006-09-17	Grevenmacher	L 0-2	33.7	920	1115	20.12%	22.55%	57.33%	-0.89	-11.9	0
2006-09-17	@ Mamer 32	W 2-0	33.7	1115	920	57.33%	22.55%	20.12%	+0.89	+11.9	13
2006-09-17	Jeunesse Esch	D 0-0	49.1	1074	1107	39.58%	23.88%	36.54%	+0.06	-0.2	10
2006-09-17	@ Swift Hesperange	D 0-0	49.1	1107	1074	36.54%	23.88%	39.58%	-0.06	+0.2	5
2006-09-17	Mondercange	L 2-3	58.4	1036	863	63.83%	21.24%	14.92%	+1.27	-14.8	7
2006-09-17	@ Victoria Rosport	W 3-2	58.4	863	1036	14.92%	21.24%	63.83%	-1.27	+14.8	4
2006-09-17	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 2-2	58.1	1208	1109	56.41%	22.69%	20.90%	+0.84	-1.6	10
2006-09-17	@ F91 Dudelange	D 2-2	58.1	1109	1208	20.90%	22.69%	56.41%	-0.84	+1.6	12
2006-09-17	CS Petange	D 0-0	49.1	999	1093	31.30%	23.74%	44.96%	-0.29	+0.9	8
2006-09-17	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 0-0	49.1	1093	999	44.96%	23.74%	31.30%	+0.29	-0.9	12
2006-09-20	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	52.9	1073	1155	32.92%	23.81%	43.27%	-0.22	+0.6	11
2006-09-20	@ Swift Hesperange	D 1-1	52.9	1155	1073	43.27%	23.81%	32.92%	+0.22	-0.6	13
2006-09-20	Grevenmacher	L 0-1	39.1	1004	1127	27.67%	23.51%	48.82%	-0.46	-8.3	6
2006-09-20	@ Wiltz 71	W 1-0	39.1	1127	1004	48.82%	23.51%	27.67%	+0.46	+8.3	16
2006-09-20	Mondercange	L 0-2	47.5	1107	878	68.63%	19.86%	11.51%	+1.61	-33.3	5
2006-09-20	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 2-0	47.5	878	1107	11.51%	19.86%	68.63%	-1.61	+33.3	7
2006-09-20	Progres Niedercorn	D 2-2	57.8	1021	1000	47.03%	23.63%	29.34%	+0.38	-0.8	8
2006-09-20	@ Victoria Rosport	D 2-2	57.8	1000	1021	29.34%	23.63%	47.03%	-0.38	+0.8	9
2006-09-20	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.1	932	1111	21.64%	22.81%	55.55%	-0.79	+2.0	13
2006-09-20	@ Differdange 03	D 1-1	53.1	1111	932	55.55%	22.81%	21.64%	+0.79	-2.0	13
2006-09-20	UN Kaerjeng	L 0-3	35.7	908	988	33.00%	23.81%	43.19%	-0.21	-26.1	0
2006-09-20	@ Mamer 32	W 3-0	35.7	988	908	43.19%	23.81%	33.00%	+0.21	+26.1	8
2006-09-20	CS Petange	W 4-1	36.1	1206	1092	58.09%	22.43%	19.49%	+0.93	+14.1	13
2006-09-20	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-4	36.1	1092	1206	19.49%	22.43%	58.09%	-0.93	-14.1	12
2006-09-24	Differdange 03	L 2-3	57.8	1078	934	61.14%	21.85%	17.00%	+1.11	-14.2	12
2006-09-24	@ CS Petange	W 3-2	57.8	934	1078	17.00%	21.85%	61.14%	-1.11	+14.2	16
2006-09-24	F91 Dudelange	D 0-0	49.3	1135	1221	32.36%	23.79%	43.85%	-0.24	+0.7	17
2006-09-24	@ Grevenmacher	D 0-0	49.3	1221	1135	43.85%	23.79%	32.36%	+0.24	-0.7	14
2006-09-24	Mamer 32	L 0-1	45.2	911	882	48.17%	23.56%	28.27%	+0.43	-12.9	7
2006-09-24	@ Mondercange	W 1-0	45.2	882	911	28.27%	23.56%	48.17%	-0.43	+12.9	3
2006-09-24	Progres Niedercorn	W 6-0	29.2	1154	1001	61.98%	21.67%	16.34%	+1.16	+27.2	16
2006-09-24	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-6	29.2	1001	1154	16.34%	21.67%	61.98%	-1.16	-27.2	9
2006-09-24	Swift Hesperange	L 0-1	40.9	996	1074	33.28%	23.82%	42.90%	-0.20	-9.6	6
2006-09-24	@ Wiltz 71	W 1-0	40.9	1074	996	42.90%	23.82%	33.28%	+0.20	+9.6	14
2006-09-24	UN Kaerjeng	W 2-0	34.1	1109	1014	55.93%	22.76%	21.31%	+0.81	+12.5	16
2006-09-24	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-2	34.1	1014	1109	21.31%	22.76%	55.93%	-0.81	-12.5	8
2006-09-24	Victoria Rosport	W 2-0	35.6	1074	1020	51.18%	23.32%	25.51%	+0.57	+14.6	8
2006-09-24	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	35.6	1020	1074	25.51%	23.32%	51.18%	-0.57	-14.6	8
2006-09-30	Wiltz 71	W 1-0	39.6	1006	986	46.89%	23.64%	29.47%	+0.38	+8.7	11
2006-09-30	@ Victoria Rosport	L 0-1	39.6	986	1006	29.47%	23.64%	46.89%	-0.38	-8.7	6
2006-10-01	Differdange 03	D 1-1	53.4	1084	948	60.29%	22.03%	17.68%	+1.06	-2.6	15
2006-10-01	@ Swift Hesperange	D 1-1	53.4	948	1084	17.68%	22.03%	60.29%	-1.06	+2.6	17
2006-10-01	Grevenmacher	D 2-2	57.8	1002	1136	26.41%	23.41%	50.19%	-0.53	+1.0	9
2006-10-01	@ UN Kaerjeng	D 2-2	57.8	1136	1002	50.19%	23.41%	26.41%	+0.53	-1.0	18
2006-10-01	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	36.6	894	1089	20.24%	22.57%	57.19%	-0.88	-6.3	3
2006-10-01	@ Mamer 32	W 1-0	36.6	1089	894	57.19%	22.57%	20.24%	+0.88	+6.3	11
2006-10-01	Mondercange	W 3-0	26.1	1220	898	75.18%	17.31%	7.51%	+2.15	+6.4	17
2006-10-01	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-3	26.1	898	1220	7.51%	17.31%	75.18%	-2.15	-6.4	7
2006-10-01	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 2-2	57.9	974	1121	24.90%	23.25%	51.85%	-0.61	+1.2	10
2006-10-01	@ Progres Niedercorn	D 2-2	57.9	1121	974	51.85%	23.25%	24.90%	+0.61	-1.2	17
2006-10-01	CS Petange	W 2-1	40.7	1181	1064	58.42%	22.37%	19.21%	+0.95	+5.7	19
2006-10-01	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-2	40.7	1064	1181	19.21%	22.37%	58.42%	-0.95	-5.7	12
2006-10-15	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-1	47.8	1120	1187	34.87%	23.86%	41.27%	-0.13	+10.7	20
2006-10-15	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-2	47.8	1187	1120	41.27%	23.86%	34.87%	+0.13	-10.7	19
2006-10-15	F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	36.1	1095	1226	26.71%	23.43%	49.85%	-0.51	-15.2	11
2006-10-15	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 2-0	36.1	1226	1095	49.85%	23.43%	26.71%	+0.51	+15.2	20
2006-10-15	Mamer 32	W 1-0	37.1	977	888	55.34%	22.84%	21.82%	+0.78	+6.8	9
2006-10-15	@ Wiltz 71	L 0-1	37.1	888	977	21.82%	22.84%	55.34%	-0.78	-6.8	3
2006-10-15	Progres Niedercorn	L 2-4	55.1	1135	975	62.62%	21.53%	15.85%	+1.20	-23.8	18
2006-10-15	@ Grevenmacher	W 4-2	55.1	975	1135	15.85%	21.53%	62.62%	-1.20	+23.8	13
2006-10-15	Swift Hesperange	D 2-2	57.7	1058	1081	41.06%	23.86%	35.07%	+0.12	-0.2	13
2006-10-15	@ CS Petange	D 2-2	57.7	1081	1058	35.07%	23.86%	41.06%	-0.12	+0.2	16
2006-10-15	UN Kaerjeng	L 1-3	41.6	892	1003	29.11%	23.62%	47.27%	-0.39	-14.1	7
2006-10-15	@ Mondercange	W 3-1	41.6	1003	892	47.27%	23.62%	29.11%	+0.39	+14.1	12
2006-10-15	Victoria Rosport	W 3-0	38.1	951	1015	35.25%	23.86%	40.88%	-0.12	+30.9	20
2006-10-15	@ Differdange 03	L 0-3	38.1	1015	951	40.88%	23.86%	35.25%	+0.12	-30.9	11
2006-10-21	Wiltz 71	W 7-1	28.9	1241	984	70.76%	19.12%	10.12%	+1.77	+13.8	23
2006-10-21	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-7	28.9	984	1241	10.12%	19.12%	70.76%	-1.77	-13.8	9
2006-10-22	Differdange 03	L 0-8	35.1	881	981	30.48%	23.70%	45.82%	-0.33	-61.7	3
2006-10-22	@ Mamer 32	W 8-0	35.1	981	881	45.82%	23.70%	30.48%	+0.33	+61.7	23
2006-10-22	Grevenmacher	L 1-2	51.0	1176	1111	52.56%	23.18%	24.26%	+0.64	-13.1	19
2006-10-22	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-1	51.0	1111	1176	24.26%	23.18%	52.56%	-0.64	+13.1	21
2006-10-22	Jeunesse Esch	L 2-4	47.7	1017	1080	35.43%	23.87%	40.70%	-0.11	-14.8	12
2006-10-22	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 4-2	47.7	1080	1017	40.70%	23.87%	35.43%	+0.11	+14.7	14
2006-10-22	Mondercange	W 2-0	33.3	999	878	58.78%	22.31%	18.91%	+0.97	+11.2	16
2006-10-22	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 0-2	33.3	878	999	18.91%	22.31%	58.78%	-0.97	-11.2	7
2006-10-22	Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	37.3	984	1081	30.78%	23.72%	45.51%	-0.31	-17.0	11
2006-10-22	@ Victoria Rosport	W 2-0	37.3	1081	984	45.51%	23.72%	30.78%	+0.31	+17.0	19
2006-10-22	CS Petange	W 3-0	32.7	1131	1058	53.49%	23.07%	23.43%	+0.69	+19.7	23
2006-10-22	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	32.7	1058	1131	23.43%	23.07%	53.49%	-0.69	-19.7	13
2006-11-12	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-3	35.7	867	1163	12.69%	20.40%	66.90%	-1.48	-6.6	7
2006-11-12	@ Mondercange	W 3-1	35.7	1163	867	66.90%	20.40%	12.69%	+1.48	+6.6	22
2006-11-12	F91 Dudelange	L 1-2	40.6	1043	1255	18.67%	22.25%	59.08%	-0.99	-5.5	23
2006-11-12	@ Differdange 03	W 2-1	40.6	1255	1043	59.08%	22.25%	18.67%	+0.99	+5.5	26
2006-11-12	Mamer 32	W 3-2	41.2	1098	820	72.30%	18.53%	9.17%	+1.90	+2.6	22
2006-11-12	@ Swift Hesperange	L 2-3	41.2	820	1098	9.17%	18.53%	72.30%	-1.90	-2.6	3
2006-11-12	Progres Niedercorn	L 0-3	42.0	1095	1010	54.82%	22.91%	22.27%	+0.76	-39.5	14
2006-11-12	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 3-0	42.0	1010	1095	22.27%	22.91%	54.82%	-0.76	+39.5	19
2006-11-12	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 4-0	35.4	1124	1151	40.59%	23.87%	35.54%	+0.10	+36.2	24
2006-11-12	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-4	35.4	1151	1124	35.54%	23.87%	40.59%	-0.10	-36.2	23
2006-11-12	UN Kaerjeng	W 3-0	36.7	970	1002	39.77%	23.88%	36.35%	+0.07	+28.2	12
2006-11-12	@ Wiltz 71	L 0-3	36.7	1002	970	36.35%	23.88%	39.77%	-0.07	-28.2	12
2006-11-12	Victoria Rosport	W 2-1	42.2	1038	967	53.31%	23.09%	23.59%	+0.68	+6.8	16
2006-11-12	@ CS Petange	L 1-2	42.2	967	1038	23.59%	23.09%	53.31%	-0.68	-6.8	11
2006-11-19	Differdange 03	L 3-4	53.9	974	1038	35.34%	23.87%	40.79%	-0.11	-8.8	12
2006-11-19	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 4-3	53.9	1038	974	40.79%	23.87%	35.34%	+0.11	+8.8	26
2006-11-19	Jeunesse Esch	W 2-0	33.5	1170	1055	58.13%	22.42%	19.45%	+0.93	+11.5	25
2006-11-19	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-2	33.5	1055	1170	19.45%	22.42%	58.13%	-0.93	-11.5	14
2006-11-19	Mondercange	W 7-2	30.9	1114	860	70.54%	19.20%	10.26%	+1.75	+9.9	26
2006-11-19	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 2-7	30.9	860	1114	10.26%	19.20%	70.54%	-1.75	-9.9	7
2006-11-19	Swift Hesperange	W 2-0	32.3	1261	1101	62.62%	21.53%	15.85%	+1.20	+9.5	29
2006-11-19	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	32.3	1101	1261	15.85%	21.53%	62.62%	-1.20	-9.5	22
2006-11-19	CS Petange	W 1-0	36.3	1160	1045	58.21%	22.41%	19.39%	+0.94	+6.1	27
2006-11-19	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-1	36.3	1045	1160	19.39%	22.41%	58.21%	-0.94	-6.1	16
2006-11-19	Victoria Rosport	D 1-1	53.0	817	960	25.42%	23.31%	51.27%	-0.58	+1.5	4
2006-11-19	@ Mamer 32	D 1-1	53.0	960	817	51.27%	23.31%	25.42%	+0.58	-1.5	12
2006-11-19	Wiltz 71	L 0-2	43.2	1050	998	50.88%	23.35%	25.78%	+0.56	-25.5	19
2006-11-19	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 2-0	43.2	998	1050	25.78%	23.35%	50.88%	-0.56	+25.5	15
2006-11-26	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 2-2	57.9	1046	1181	26.30%	23.40%	50.31%	-0.53	+1.1	27
2006-11-26	@ Differdange 03	D 2-2	57.9	1181	1046	50.31%	23.40%	26.30%	+0.53	-1.0	26
2006-11-26	Grevenmacher	D 1-1	52.9	1044	1166	27.67%	23.52%	48.81%	-0.46	+1.2	15
2006-11-26	@ Jeunesse Esch	D 1-1	52.9	1166	1044	48.81%	23.52%	27.67%	+0.46	-1.2	28
2006-11-26	Progres Niedercorn	L 0-1	46.5	1091	1024	52.82%	23.15%	24.03%	+0.65	-14.0	22
2006-11-26	@ Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	46.5	1024	1091	24.03%	23.15%	52.82%	-0.65	+14.0	22
2006-11-26	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	52.9	1024	1124	30.43%	23.70%	45.87%	-0.33	+0.9	16
2006-11-26	@ Wiltz 71	D 1-1	52.9	1124	1024	45.87%	23.70%	30.43%	+0.33	-0.9	27
2006-11-26	UN Kaerjeng	W 2-1	45.2	958	965	43.27%	23.81%	32.92%	+0.22	+9.0	15
2006-11-26	@ Victoria Rosport	L 1-2	45.2	965	958	32.92%	23.81%	43.27%	-0.22	-9.0	12
2006-11-26	CS Petange	L 1-3	38.8	850	1039	20.74%	22.66%	56.59%	-0.85	-10.6	7
2006-11-26	@ Mondercange	W 3-1	38.8	1039	850	56.59%	22.66%	20.74%	+0.85	+10.6	19
2006-12-03	Differdange 03	D 1-1	53.1	1123	1047	53.84%	23.03%	23.13%	+0.71	-1.8	28
2006-12-03	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.1	1047	1123	23.13%	23.03%	53.84%	-0.71	+1.8	28
2006-12-03	F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	33.0	1049	1270	17.95%	22.09%	59.96%	-1.04	-10.7	19
2006-12-03	@ CS Petange	W 2-0	33.0	1270	1049	59.96%	22.09%	17.95%	+1.04	+10.7	32
2006-12-03	Jeunesse Esch	D 1-1	53.2	840	1045	19.27%	22.38%	58.35%	-0.95	+2.4	8
2006-12-03	@ Mondercange	D 1-1	53.2	1045	840	58.35%	22.38%	19.27%	+0.95	-2.4	16
2006-12-03	Mamer 32	W 4-0	29.3	956	819	60.49%	21.99%	17.52%	+1.07	+19.8	15
2006-12-03	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 0-4	29.3	819	956	17.52%	21.99%	60.49%	-1.07	-19.8	4
2006-12-03	Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	36.7	1180	1077	56.84%	22.63%	20.53%	+0.86	+6.4	29
2006-12-03	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-1	36.7	1077	1180	20.53%	22.63%	56.84%	-0.86	-6.4	22
2006-12-03	Victoria Rosport	W 3-2	47.0	1038	967	53.23%	23.10%	23.66%	+0.68	+6.5	25
2006-12-03	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 2-3	47.0	967	1038	23.66%	23.10%	53.23%	-0.68	-6.5	15
2006-12-03	Wiltz 71	L 0-2	45.8	1165	1025	60.76%	21.93%	17.31%	+1.08	-29.9	28
2006-12-03	@ Grevenmacher	W 2-0	45.8	1025	1165	17.31%	21.93%	60.76%	-1.08	+29.9	19
2006-12-06	F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	27.1	799	1281	5.35%	15.19%	79.46%	-2.57	-3.0	4
2006-12-06	@ Mamer 32	W 2-0	27.1	1281	799	79.46%	15.19%	5.35%	+2.57	+3.0	35
2006-12-09	Grevenmacher	D 2-2	57.7	1049	1135	32.27%	23.78%	43.95%	-0.25	+0.5	29
2006-12-09	@ Differdange 03	D 2-2	57.7	1135	1049	43.95%	23.78%	32.27%	+0.25	-0.5	29
2006-12-09	Mondercange	D 0-0	50.2	1055	842	67.28%	20.29%	12.43%	+1.51	-3.9	20
2006-12-09	@ Wiltz 71	D 0-0	50.2	842	1055	12.43%	20.29%	67.28%	-1.51	+3.9	9
2006-12-09	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 4-1	42.3	1071	1122	37.14%	23.89%	38.97%	-0.04	+25.1	25
2006-12-09	@ Swift Hesperange	L 1-4	42.3	1122	1071	38.97%	23.89%	37.14%	+0.04	-25.1	28
2006-12-09	UN Kaerjeng	W 3-0	26.4	1284	976	74.28%	17.71%	8.01%	+2.07	+6.8	38
2006-12-09	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-3	26.4	976	1284	8.01%	17.71%	74.28%	-2.07	-6.8	15
2006-12-09	CS Petange	W 2-0	37.5	1042	1039	44.73%	23.75%	31.52%	+0.28	+17.4	19
2006-12-09	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	37.5	1039	1042	31.52%	23.75%	44.73%	-0.28	-17.4	19
2006-12-10	Progres Niedercorn	D 2-2	58.4	796	1045	15.80%	21.52%	62.69%	-1.20	+2.2	5
2006-12-10	@ Mamer 32	D 2-2	58.4	1045	796	62.69%	21.52%	15.80%	+1.20	-2.2	26
2006-12-17	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-2	40.1	961	1187	17.54%	21.99%	60.47%	-1.07	-5.2	15
2006-12-17	@ Victoria Rosport	W 2-1	40.1	1187	961	60.47%	21.99%	17.54%	+1.07	+5.2	32
2007-03-04	Differdange 03	D 2-2	58.1	846	1050	19.38%	22.40%	58.22%	-0.94	+1.8	10
2007-03-04	@ Mondercange	D 2-2	58.1	1050	846	58.22%	22.40%	19.38%	+0.94	-1.8	30
2007-03-04	F91 Dudelange	L 1-3	37.1	1042	1291	15.83%	21.53%	62.64%	-1.20	-8.2	26
2007-03-04	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 3-1	37.1	1291	1042	62.64%	21.53%	15.83%	+1.20	+8.2	41
2007-03-04	Mamer 32	W 2-0	27.1	1192	798	79.46%	15.19%	5.35%	+2.57	+3.0	35
2007-03-04	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-2	27.1	798	1192	5.35%	15.19%	79.46%	-2.57	-3.0	5
2007-03-04	Swift Hesperange	D 1-1	53.0	1135	1096	49.32%	23.48%	27.20%	+0.49	-1.3	30
2007-03-04	@ Grevenmacher	D 1-1	53.0	1096	1135	27.20%	23.48%	49.32%	-0.49	+1.3	26
2007-03-04	UN Kaerjeng	D 2-2	57.8	1021	969	50.97%	23.34%	25.69%	+0.56	-1.1	20
2007-03-04	@ CS Petange	D 2-2	57.8	969	1021	25.69%	23.34%	50.97%	-0.56	+1.1	16
2007-03-04	Victoria Rosport	D 0-0	49.7	1096	956	60.81%	21.92%	17.27%	+1.09	-3.0	29
2007-03-04	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	D 0-0	49.7	956	1096	17.27%	21.92%	60.81%	-1.09	+3.0	16
2007-03-04	Wiltz 71	L 0-2	41.7	1060	1051	45.45%	23.72%	30.84%	+0.31	-23.2	19
2007-03-04	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 2-0	41.7	1051	1060	30.84%	23.72%	45.45%	-0.31	+23.2	23
2007-03-11	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 4-1	36.7	1299	1195	57.00%	22.60%	20.40%	+0.87	+14.7	44
2007-03-11	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-4	36.7	1195	1299	20.40%	22.60%	57.00%	-0.87	-14.7	35
2007-03-11	Grevenmacher	W 2-0	44.3	959	1134	22.05%	22.88%	55.07%	-0.77	+27.3	19
2007-03-11	@ Victoria Rosport	L 0-2	44.3	1134	959	55.07%	22.88%	22.05%	+0.77	-27.3	30
2007-03-11	Jeunesse Esch	W 4-1	39.7	1048	1037	45.78%	23.70%	30.52%	+0.33	+20.7	33
2007-03-11	@ Differdange 03	L 1-4	39.7	1037	1048	30.52%	23.70%	45.78%	-0.33	-20.7	19
2007-03-11	Mondercange	W 3-0	27.6	1097	848	70.20%	19.32%	10.48%	+1.73	+9.1	29
2007-03-11	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-3	27.6	848	1097	10.48%	19.32%	70.20%	-1.73	-9.1	10
2007-03-11	Progres Niedercorn	L 0-2	38.7	971	1034	35.30%	23.87%	40.84%	-0.11	-19.0	16
2007-03-11	@ UN Kaerjeng	W 2-0	38.7	1034	971	40.84%	23.87%	35.30%	+0.11	+19.0	29
2007-03-11	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	28.5	795	1093	12.57%	20.35%	67.07%	-1.49	-11.0	5
2007-03-11	@ Mamer 32	W 3-0	28.5	1093	795	67.07%	20.35%	12.57%	+1.49	+11.0	32
2007-03-11	CS Petange	W 2-1	42.9	1074	1020	51.18%	23.32%	25.50%	+0.57	+7.3	26
2007-03-11	@ Wiltz 71	L 1-2	42.9	1020	1074	25.50%	23.32%	51.18%	-0.57	-7.3	20
2007-03-16	Progres Niedercorn	W 1-0	42.1	1013	1053	38.62%	23.89%	37.49%	+0.02	+10.5	23
2007-03-16	@ CS Petange	L 0-1	42.1	1053	1013	37.49%	23.89%	38.62%	-0.02	-10.5	29
2007-03-18	Differdange 03	L 1-3	46.7	1081	1069	45.93%	23.69%	30.38%	+0.33	-20.2	26
2007-03-18	@ Wiltz 71	W 3-1	46.7	1069	1081	30.38%	23.69%	45.93%	-0.33	+20.2	36
2007-03-18	F91 Dudelange	W 1-0	48.3	1104	1314	18.92%	22.31%	58.77%	-0.97	+15.4	35
2007-03-18	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	48.3	1314	1104	58.77%	22.31%	18.92%	+0.97	-15.4	44
2007-03-18	Mamer 32	W 4-1	30.8	1106	784	75.23%	17.29%	7.49%	+2.15	+5.3	33
2007-03-18	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-4	30.8	784	1106	7.49%	17.29%	75.23%	-2.15	-5.3	5
2007-03-18	Swift Hesperange	L 0-1	40.4	1016	1106	31.68%	23.76%	44.57%	-0.27	-9.2	19
2007-03-18	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 1-0	40.4	1106	1016	44.57%	23.76%	31.68%	+0.27	+9.2	32
2007-03-18	UN Kaerjeng	L 1-2	54.8	1180	952	68.56%	19.89%	11.56%	+1.60	-16.6	35
2007-03-18	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-1	54.8	952	1180	11.56%	19.89%	68.56%	-1.60	+16.6	19
2007-03-18	Victoria Rosport	W 2-0	43.4	839	986	24.91%	23.25%	51.84%	-0.61	+25.9	13
2007-03-18	@ Mondercange	L 0-2	43.4	986	839	51.84%	23.25%	24.91%	+0.61	-25.9	19
2007-03-30	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 3-2	55.6	968	1120	24.45%	23.20%	52.35%	-0.63	+12.4	22
2007-03-30	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 2-3	55.6	1120	968	52.35%	23.20%	24.45%	+0.63	-12.4	35
2007-03-31	Mondercange	D 1-1	52.8	779	864	32.32%	23.78%	43.90%	-0.24	+0.6	6
2007-03-31	@ Mamer 32	D 1-1	52.8	864	779	43.90%	23.78%	32.32%	+0.24	-0.7	14
2007-04-01	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 2-4	45.4	1043	1163	27.93%	23.54%	48.54%	-0.45	-12.2	29
2007-04-01	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 4-2	45.4	1163	1043	48.54%	23.54%	27.93%	+0.45	+12.2	38
2007-04-01	Grevenmacher	W 2-1	38.9	1298	1112	65.06%	20.92%	14.01%	+1.36	+4.2	47
2007-04-01	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-2	38.9	1112	1298	14.01%	20.92%	65.06%	-1.36	-4.2	33
2007-04-01	Jeunesse Esch	W 1-0	42.4	960	1007	37.70%	23.89%	38.41%	-0.01	+10.7	22
2007-04-01	@ Victoria Rosport	L 0-1	42.4	1007	960	38.41%	23.89%	37.70%	+0.01	-10.7	19
2007-04-01	CS Petange	L 0-1	46.5	1089	1024	52.59%	23.17%	24.23%	+0.64	-13.9	36
2007-04-01	@ Differdange 03	W 1-0	46.5	1024	1089	24.23%	23.17%	52.59%	-0.64	+13.9	26
2007-04-01	Wiltz 71	W 2-0	35.5	1116	1061	51.31%	23.30%	25.39%	+0.58	+14.5	35
2007-04-01	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	35.5	1061	1116	25.39%	23.30%	51.31%	-0.58	-14.5	26
2007-04-15	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	53.0	1037	1176	25.92%	23.36%	50.72%	-0.55	+1.5	27
2007-04-15	@ CS Petange	D 1-1	53.0	1176	1037	50.72%	23.36%	25.92%	+0.55	-1.5	39
2007-04-15	F91 Dudelange	L 1-3	32.7	864	1302	6.56%	16.47%	76.97%	-2.32	-3.3	14
2007-04-15	@ Mondercange	W 3-1	32.7	1302	864	76.97%	16.47%	6.56%	+2.32	+3.3	50
2007-04-15	Mamer 32	W 2-1	37.9	996	779	67.59%	20.19%	12.21%	+1.53	+3.7	22
2007-04-15	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-2	37.9	779	996	12.21%	20.19%	67.59%	-1.53	-3.7	6
2007-04-15	Progres Niedercorn	L 1-3	48.9	1107	1030	53.96%	23.02%	23.02%	+0.71	-23.2	35
2007-04-15	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 3-1	48.9	1030	1107	23.02%	23.02%	53.96%	-0.71	+23.2	32
2007-04-15	Swift Hesperange	W 2-1	47.3	1075	1130	36.47%	23.88%	39.65%	-0.07	+10.4	39
2007-04-15	@ Differdange 03	L 1-2	47.3	1130	1075	39.65%	23.88%	36.47%	+0.07	-10.4	35
2007-04-15	UN Kaerjeng	L 0-2	45.4	1107	981	59.38%	22.20%	18.42%	+1.00	-29.3	33
2007-04-15	@ Grevenmacher	W 2-0	45.4	981	1107	18.42%	22.20%	59.38%	-1.00	+29.3	25
2007-04-15	Victoria Rosport	D 1-1	53.1	1046	971	53.81%	23.04%	23.15%	+0.70	-1.8	27
2007-04-15	@ Wiltz 71	D 1-1	53.1	971	1046	23.15%	23.04%	53.81%	-0.70	+1.8	23
2007-04-27	Mondercange	W 1-0	35.2	1010	861	61.62%	21.75%	16.62%	+1.14	+5.3	28
2007-04-27	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 0-1	35.2	861	1010	16.62%	21.75%	61.62%	-1.14	-5.3	14
2007-04-29	Differdange 03	L 0-4	33.3	973	1085	28.89%	23.60%	47.50%	-0.40	-30.7	23
2007-04-29	@ Victoria Rosport	W 4-0	33.3	1085	973	47.50%	23.60%	28.89%	+0.40	+30.7	42
2007-04-29	Grevenmacher	L 4-8	44.8	1054	1078	40.87%	23.87%	35.27%	+0.12	-24.5	32
2007-04-29	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 8-4	44.8	1078	1054	35.27%	23.87%	40.87%	-0.12	+24.5	36
2007-04-29	Jeunesse Esch	W 1-0	31.6	1306	1000	74.18%	17.75%	8.07%	+2.06	+2.5	53
2007-04-29	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-1	31.6	1000	1306	8.07%	17.75%	74.18%	-2.06	-2.5	22
2007-04-29	CS Petange	L 0-1	47.0	1120	1039	54.42%	22.96%	22.62%	+0.73	-14.3	35
2007-04-29	@ Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	47.0	1039	1120	22.62%	22.96%	54.42%	-0.73	+14.3	30
2007-04-29	Wiltz 71	D 0-0	49.9	776	1045	14.40%	21.06%	64.53%	-1.32	+3.5	7
2007-04-29	@ Mamer 32	D 0-0	49.9	1045	776	64.53%	21.06%	14.40%	+1.32	-3.5	28
2007-05-06	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-3	36.2	1103	1174	34.22%	23.84%	41.94%	-0.16	-26.9	36
2007-05-06	@ Grevenmacher	W 3-0	36.2	1174	1103	41.94%	23.84%	34.22%	+0.16	+26.9	42
2007-05-06	F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	31.7	1041	1308	14.53%	21.11%	64.37%	-1.31	-8.7	28
2007-05-06	@ Wiltz 71	W 2-0	31.7	1308	1041	64.37%	21.11%	14.53%	+1.31	+8.7	56
2007-05-06	Mamer 32	W 5-1	28.7	1116	779	76.15%	16.86%	6.99%	+2.24	+6.4	45
2007-05-06	@ Differdange 03	L 1-5	28.7	779	1116	6.99%	16.86%	76.15%	-2.24	-6.4	7
2007-05-06	Progres Niedercorn	W 3-1	49.1	855	1029	22.16%	22.89%	54.94%	-0.76	+23.6	17
2007-05-06	@ Mondercange	L 1-3	49.1	1029	855	54.94%	22.89%	22.16%	+0.76	-23.6	32
2007-05-06	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 0-5	36.5	1053	1084	39.94%	23.88%	36.18%	+0.08	-48.8	30
2007-05-06	@ CS Petange	W 5-0	36.5	1084	1053	36.18%	23.88%	39.94%	-0.08	+48.8	38
2007-05-06	UN Kaerjeng	W 2-0	38.4	997	1015	41.75%	23.85%	34.40%	+0.15	+18.6	25
2007-05-06	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	38.4	1015	997	34.40%	23.85%	41.75%	-0.15	-18.6	28
2007-05-06	Victoria Rosport	W 2-0	32.0	1106	942	62.99%	21.45%	15.57%	+1.22	+9.3	38
2007-05-06	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	32.0	942	1106	15.57%	21.45%	62.99%	-1.22	-9.3	23
2007-05-09	Differdange 03	W 3-0	29.2	1317	1122	65.74%	20.74%	13.52%	+1.40	+11.8	59
2007-05-09	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-3	29.2	1122	1317	13.52%	20.74%	65.74%	-1.40	-11.8	45
2007-05-09	Grevenmacher	L 0-1	46.2	1133	1076	51.62%	23.27%	25.11%	+0.60	-13.7	38
2007-05-09	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 1-0	46.2	1076	1133	25.11%	23.27%	51.62%	-0.60	+13.7	39
2007-05-09	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	43.7	1006	1016	42.86%	23.82%	33.32%	+0.20	-11.7	32
2007-05-09	@ Progres Niedercorn	W 1-0	43.7	1016	1006	33.32%	23.82%	42.86%	-0.20	+11.7	28
2007-05-09	Mondercange	W 2-0	28.4	1201	879	75.22%	17.29%	7.49%	+2.15	+4.4	45
2007-05-09	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-2	28.4	879	1201	7.49%	17.29%	75.22%	-2.15	-4.4	17
2007-05-09	Swift Hesperange	D 2-2	59.1	773	1115	10.28%	19.22%	70.50%	-1.75	+2.9	8
2007-05-09	@ Mamer 32	D 2-2	59.1	1115	773	70.50%	19.22%	10.28%	+1.75	-2.9	39
2007-05-09	CS Petange	W 2-0	40.7	933	1004	34.17%	23.84%	41.99%	-0.16	+21.7	26
2007-05-09	@ Victoria Rosport	L 0-2	40.7	1004	933	41.99%	23.84%	34.17%	+0.16	-21.7	30
2007-05-09	Wiltz 71	W 1-0	41.9	997	1032	39.24%	23.88%	36.88%	+0.05	+10.4	31
2007-05-09	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 0-1	41.9	1032	997	36.88%	23.88%	39.24%	-0.05	-10.4	28
2007-05-13	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 3-3	62.1	1027	1205	21.75%	22.83%	55.42%	-0.79	+1.2	29
2007-05-13	@ Jeunesse Esch	D 3-3	62.1	1205	1027	55.42%	22.83%	21.75%	+0.79	-1.3	46
2007-05-13	F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	33.3	1112	1329	18.28%	22.17%	59.55%	-1.01	-10.9	39
2007-05-13	@ Swift Hesperange	W 2-0	33.3	1329	1112	59.55%	22.17%	18.28%	+1.01	+10.9	62
2007-05-13	Grevenmacher	D 1-1	52.9	983	1089	29.64%	23.65%	46.70%	-0.37	+1.0	31
2007-05-13	@ CS Petange	D 1-1	52.9	1089	983	46.70%	23.65%	29.64%	+0.37	-1.0	40
2007-05-13	Mamer 32	D 3-3	62.6	954	776	64.35%	21.11%	14.54%	+1.31	-1.9	27
2007-05-13	@ Victoria Rosport	D 3-3	62.6	776	954	14.54%	21.11%	64.35%	-1.31	+1.9	9
2007-05-13	Progres Niedercorn	W 4-0	33.1	1022	994	47.98%	23.57%	28.45%	+0.42	+30.3	31
2007-05-13	@ Wiltz 71	L 0-4	33.1	994	1022	28.45%	23.57%	47.98%	-0.42	-30.3	32
2007-05-13	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	L 1-4	34.7	875	1119	16.09%	21.60%	62.31%	-1.18	-11.8	17
2007-05-13	@ Mondercange	W 4-1	34.7	1119	875	62.31%	21.60%	16.09%	+1.18	+11.8	41
2007-05-13	UN Kaerjeng	W 7-1	33.0	1111	1007	56.95%	22.61%	20.44%	+0.87	+27.6	48
2007-05-13	@ Differdange 03	L 1-7	33.0	1007	1111	20.44%	22.61%	56.95%	-0.87	-27.6	31
2007-05-16	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 2-0	35.0	1204	1131	53.50%	23.07%	23.43%	+0.69	+13.6	49
2007-05-16	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-2	35.0	1131	1204	23.43%	23.07%	53.50%	-0.69	-13.6	41
2007-05-20	Differdange 03	W 5-4	61.1	964	1138	22.08%	22.88%	55.04%	-0.77	+12.5	35
2007-05-20	@ Progres Niedercorn	L 4-5	61.1	1138	964	55.04%	22.88%	22.08%	+0.77	-12.5	48
2007-05-20	Jeunesse Esch	L 1-3	49.3	1118	1029	55.32%	22.84%	21.83%	+0.78	-23.8	41
2007-05-20	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	W 3-1	49.3	1029	1118	21.83%	22.84%	55.32%	-0.78	+23.8	32
2007-05-20	Mondercange	D 0-0	50.3	1088	863	68.33%	19.96%	11.71%	+1.58	-4.0	41
2007-05-20	@ Grevenmacher	D 0-0	50.3	863	1088	11.71%	19.96%	68.33%	-1.58	+4.0	18
2007-05-20	Swift Hesperange	W 3-2	54.6	979	1101	27.81%	23.53%	48.66%	-0.46	+11.6	34
2007-05-20	@ UN Kaerjeng	L 2-3	54.6	1101	979	48.66%	23.53%	27.81%	+0.46	-11.6	39
2007-05-20	CS Petange	D 2-2	58.1	778	984	19.18%	22.36%	58.46%	-0.95	+1.8	10
2007-05-20	@ Mamer 32	D 2-2	58.1	984	778	58.46%	22.36%	19.18%	+0.95	-1.8	32
2007-05-20	Victoria Rosport	W 5-0	23.7	1340	952	79.10%	15.38%	5.51%	+2.53	+7.2	65
2007-05-20	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-5	23.7	952	1340	5.51%	15.38%	79.10%	-2.53	-7.2	27
2007-05-20	Wiltz 71	W 3-1	36.9	1218	1052	63.15%	21.41%	15.44%	+1.23	+8.0	52
2007-05-20	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-3	36.9	1052	1218	15.44%	21.41%	63.15%	-1.23	-8.0	31

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	2006-09-10	10.61%	Differdange 03	877	2	@ Jeunesse Esch	1124	1
2	2006-09-20	11.51%	Mondercange	878	2	@ Jeunesse Esch	1107	0
3	2007-03-18	11.56%	UN Kaerjeng	952	2	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1180	1
4	2006-09-17	14.92%	Mondercange	863	3	@ Victoria Rosport	1036	2
5	2006-09-10	15.17%	Victoria Rosport	991	3	@ Grevenmacher	1160	0
6	2006-10-15	15.85%	Progres Niedercorn	975	4	@ Grevenmacher	1135	2
7	2006-09-24	17.00%	Differdange 03	934	3	@ CS Petange	1078	2
8	2006-08-06	17.19%	@ Victoria Rosport	1008	3	F91 Dudelange	1238	0
9	2006-12-03	17.31%	Wiltz 71	1025	2	@ Grevenmacher	1165	0
10	2006-09-17	18.24%	@ UN Kaerjeng	963	3	Etzella Ettelbruck	1180	1
11	2007-04-15	18.42%	UN Kaerjeng	981	2	@ Grevenmacher	1107	0
12	2007-03-18	18.92%	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1104	1	F91 Dudelange	1314	0
13	2007-05-20	21.83%	Jeunesse Esch	1029	3	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1118	1
14	2007-03-11	22.05%	@ Victoria Rosport	959	2	Grevenmacher	1134	0
15	2007-05-20	22.08%	@ Progres Niedercorn	964	5	Differdange 03	1138	4
16	2007-05-06	22.16%	@ Mondercange	855	3	Progres Niedercorn	1029	1
17	2006-11-12	22.27%	Progres Niedercorn	1010	3	@ Jeunesse Esch	1095	0
18	2007-04-29	22.62%	CS Petange	1039	1	@ Swift Hesperange	1120	0
19	2007-04-15	23.02%	Progres Niedercorn	1030	3	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1107	1
20	2006-11-26	24.03%	Progres Niedercorn	1024	1	@ Swift Hesperange	1091	0
21	2007-04-01	24.23%	CS Petange	1024	1	@ Differdange 03	1089	0
22	2006-10-22	24.26%	Grevenmacher	1111	2	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1176	1
23	2007-03-30	24.45%	@ UN Kaerjeng	968	3	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	1120	2
24	2006-09-16	24.89%	@ Differdange 03	894	3	Wiltz 71	1042	0
25	2007-03-18	24.91%	@ Mondercange	839	2	Victoria Rosport	986	0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2006-10-22	61.71	Differdange 03	8	981	45.82%	@ Mamer 32	0	881	30.48%	23.70%
2	2007-05-06	48.80	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	5	1084	36.18%	@ CS Petange	0	1053	39.94%	23.88%
3	2006-09-10	45.18	Victoria Rosport	3	991	15.17%	@ Grevenmacher	0	1160	63.51%	21.32%
4	2006-08-06	43.50	@ Victoria Rosport	3	1008	17.19%	F91 Dudelange	0	1238	60.91%	21.90%
5	2006-08-26	43.31	@ Differdange 03	4	834	31.56%	Mondercange	0	925	44.68%	23.75%
6	2006-08-26	40.10	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	6	1065	36.57%	@ Victoria Rosport	1	1031	39.55%	23.88%
7	2006-11-12	39.54	Progres Niedercorn	3	1010	22.27%	@ Jeunesse Esch	0	1095	54.82%	22.91%
8	2006-09-16	37.64	@ Differdange 03	3	894	24.89%	Wiltz 71	0	1042	51.86%	23.25%
9	2006-09-09	37.53	@ Progres Niedercorn	4	962	38.86%	UN Kaerjeng	0	1000	37.26%	23.89%
10	2006-11-12	36.20	@ Grevenmacher	4	1124	40.59%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	0	1151	35.54%	23.87%
11	2006-09-20	33.31	Mondercange	2	878	11.51%	@ Jeunesse Esch	0	1107	68.63%	19.86%
12	2006-08-20	31.19	@ Progres Niedercorn	5	941	38.99%	Mamer 32	1	979	37.12%	23.89%
13	2006-10-15	30.87	@ Differdange 03	3	951	35.25%	Victoria Rosport	0	1015	40.88%	23.86%
14	2007-04-29	30.70	Differdange 03	4	1085	47.50%	@ Victoria Rosport	0	973	28.89%	23.60%
15	2006-08-06	30.56	@ CS Petange	4	1047	47.68%	Mamer 32	0	1021	28.73%	23.59%
16	2007-05-13	30.32	@ Wiltz 71	4	1022	47.98%	Progres Niedercorn	0	994	28.45%	23.57%
17	2006-12-03	29.88	Wiltz 71	2	1025	17.31%	@ Grevenmacher	0	1165	60.76%	21.93%
18	2007-04-15	29.27	UN Kaerjeng	2	981	18.42%	@ Grevenmacher	0	1107	59.38%	22.20%
19	2006-11-12	28.20	@ Wiltz 71	3	970	39.77%	UN Kaerjeng	0	1002	36.35%	23.88%
20	2006-08-20	28.01	Wiltz 71	5	1039	43.89%	@ Mondercange	1	953	32.33%	23.78%
21	2006-08-12	27.98	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3	1037	40.13%	Wiltz 71	0	1067	35.99%	23.88%
22	2006-08-06	27.64	Grevenmacher	4	1121	51.23%	@ Mondercange	0	978	25.46%	23.31%
23	2007-05-13	27.57	@ Differdange 03	7	1111	56.95%	UN Kaerjeng	1	1007	20.44%	22.61%
24	2007-03-11	27.34	@ Victoria Rosport	2	959	22.05%	Grevenmacher	0	1134	55.07%	22.88%
25	2006-09-24	27.17	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	6	1154	61.98%	Progres Niedercorn	0	1001	16.34%	21.67%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2007-05-13	62.6	@ Victoria Rosport	3	954	64.35%	Mamer 32	3	776	14.54%	21.11%
2	2007-05-13	62.1	@ Jeunesse Esch	3	1027	21.75%	Etzella Ettelbruck	3	1205	55.42%	22.83%
3	2007-05-20	61.1	@ Progres Niedercorn	5	964	22.08%	Differdange 03	4	1138	55.04%	22.88%
4	2007-05-09	59.1	@ Mamer 32	2	773	10.28%	Swift Hesperange	2	1115	70.50%	19.22%
5	2006-09-17	58.4	Mondercange	3	863	14.92%	@ Victoria Rosport	2	1036	63.83%	21.24%
6	2006-12-10	58.4	@ Mamer 32	2	796	15.80%	Progres Niedercorn	2	1045	62.69%	21.52%
7	2006-09-17	58.1	@ F91 Dudelange	2	1208	56.41%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2	1109	20.90%	22.69%
8	2007-03-04	58.1	@ Mondercange	2	846	19.38%	Differdange 03	2	1050	58.22%	22.40%
9	2007-05-20	58.1	@ Mamer 32	2	778	19.18%	CS Petange	2	984	58.46%	22.36%
10	2006-10-01	57.9	@ Progres Niedercorn	2	974	24.90%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2	1121	51.85%	23.25%
11	2006-11-26	57.9	@ Differdange 03	2	1046	26.30%	Etzella Ettelbruck	2	1181	50.31%	23.40%
12	2006-08-12	57.8	@ Progres Niedercorn	2	940	28.73%	Swift Hesperange	2	1054	47.68%	23.59%
13	2006-08-20	57.8	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2	1065	45.83%	Swift Hesperange	2	1053	30.47%	23.70%
14	2006-08-26	57.8	@ Swift Hesperange	2	1054	29.63%	Grevenmacher	2	1161	46.72%	23.65%
15	2006-09-20	57.8	@ Victoria Rosport	2	1021	47.03%	Progres Niedercorn	2	1000	29.34%	23.63%
16	2006-09-24	57.8	Differdange 03	3	934	17.00%	@ CS Petange	2	1078	61.14%	21.85%
17	2006-10-01	57.8	@ UN Kaerjeng	2	1002	26.41%	Grevenmacher	2	1136	50.19%	23.41%
18	2007-03-04	57.8	@ CS Petange	2	1021	50.97%	UN Kaerjeng	2	969	25.69%	23.34%
19	2006-10-15	57.7	@ CS Petange	2	1058	41.06%	Swift Hesperange	2	1081	35.07%	23.86%
20	2006-12-09	57.7	@ Differdange 03	2	1049	32.27%	Grevenmacher	2	1135	43.95%	23.78%
21	2006-08-06	57.5	@ Differdange 03	4	836	28.65%	Progres Niedercorn	3	951	47.76%	23.59%
22	2007-03-30	55.6	@ UN Kaerjeng	3	968	24.45%	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	2	1120	52.35%	23.20%
23	2006-10-15	55.1	Progres Niedercorn	4	975	15.85%	@ Grevenmacher	2	1135	62.62%	21.53%
24	2006-09-10	55.0	Differdange 03	2	877	10.61%	@ Jeunesse Esch	1	1124	70.00%	19.40%
25	2007-03-18	54.8	UN Kaerjeng	2	952	11.56%	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1	1180	68.56%	19.89%

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2007-05-20	23.7	@ F91 Dudelange	5	1340	79.10%	Victoria Rosport	0	952	5.51%	15.38%
2	2006-10-01	26.1	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1220	75.18%	Mondercange	0	898	7.51%	17.31%
3	2006-12-09	26.4	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1284	74.28%	UN Kaerjeng	0	976	8.01%	17.71%
4	2006-12-06	27.1	F91 Dudelange	2	1281	79.46%	@ Mamer 32	0	799	5.35%	15.19%
5	2007-03-04	27.1	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	2	1192	79.46%	Mamer 32	0	798	5.35%	15.19%
6	2007-03-11	27.6	@ Swift Hesperange	3	1097	70.20%	Mondercange	0	848	10.48%	19.32%
7	2006-08-20	28.4	@ Grevenmacher	2	1156	74.98%	Differdange 03	0	838	7.62%	17.40%
8	2007-05-09	28.4	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	2	1201	75.22%	Mondercange	0	879	7.49%	17.29%
9	2007-03-11	28.5	Racing FC Union Luxembourg	3	1093	67.07%	@ Mamer 32	0	795	12.57%	20.35%
10	2007-05-06	28.7	@ Differdange 03	5	1116	76.15%	Mamer 32	1	779	6.99%	16.86%
11	2006-10-21	28.9	@ F91 Dudelange	7	1241	70.76%	Wiltz 71	1	984	10.12%	19.12%
12	2006-09-24	29.2	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	6	1154	61.98%	Progres Niedercorn	0	1001	16.34%	21.67%
13	2007-05-09	29.2	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1317	65.74%	Differdange 03	0	1122	13.52%	20.74%
14	2006-12-03	29.3	@ UN Kaerjeng	4	956	60.49%	Mamer 32	0	819	17.52%	21.99%
15	2006-08-12	30.4	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	5	1105	70.78%	Differdange 03	1	848	10.11%	19.11%
16	2006-08-26	30.6	Etzella Ettelbruck	4	1135	56.50%	@ Mamer 32	0	947	20.83%	22.68%
17	2007-03-18	30.8	@ Grevenmacher	4	1106	75.23%	Mamer 32	1	784	7.49%	17.29%
18	2006-11-19	30.9	@ Racing FC Union Luxembourg	7	1114	70.54%	Mondercange	2	860	10.26%	19.20%
19	2006-08-26	31.1	@ F91 Dudelange	7	1219	70.02%	Progres Niedercorn	2	972	10.59%	19.39%
20	2007-04-29	31.6	@ F91 Dudelange	1	1306	74.18%	Jeunesse Esch	0	1000	8.07%	17.75%
21	2006-08-12	31.7	@ F91 Dudelange	5	1195	66.52%	Mamer 32	1	991	12.96%	20.52%
22	2007-05-06	31.7	F91 Dudelange	2	1308	64.37%	@ Wiltz 71	0	1041	14.53%	21.11%
23	2007-05-06	32.0	@ Swift Hesperange	2	1106	62.99%	Victoria Rosport	0	942	15.57%	21.45%
24	2006-08-06	32.1	Grevenmacher	4	1121	51.23%	@ Mondercange	0	978	25.46%	23.31%
25	2006-09-10	32.2	Swift Hesperange	3	1055	54.83%	@ Mondercange	0	882	22.26%	22.91%