1960-61 Main League Season

112 games · 4 promotion-playoff teams

Final

Champion

Fredrikstad

22 points · 9th Title

Last Title: 1959-60

Relegated

Rapid Moss

8 pts

Strommen · 11 pts

Stavanger · 11 pts

Lillestrom · 11 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Fredrikstad

5.10 points above expected

22 points · 16.90 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Stavanger

4.89 points below expected

11 points · 15.89 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Fredrikstad Champion	14	10	2	2	22	43	21	+22	16.90	+5.10
2	Valerenga	14	6	2	6	14	24	17	+7	12.85	+1.15
3	Viking	14	5	4	5	14	24	24	0	13.89	+0.11
4	Larvik Turn	14	4	6	4	14	24	30	-6	14.59	-0.59
5	IF Odd	14	4	5	5	13	26	29	-3	11.95	+1.05
6	Lisleby	14	5	3	6	13	20	26	-6	14.72	-1.72
7	Strommen Relegated	14	3	5	6	11	16	22	-6	11.21	-0.21
8	Stavanger Relegated	14	3	5	6	11	15	23	-8	15.89	-4.89

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Eik Tonsberg	14	8	2	4	18	35	21	+14	15.24	+2.76
2	Lyn Oslo	14	7	3	4	17	41	27	+14	18.03	-1.03
3	Rosenborg	14	6	4	4	16	28	28	0	17.00	-1.00
4	Greaker	14	8	0	6	16	22	26	-4	12.93	+3.07
5	Sandefjord	14	6	2	6	14	34	32	+2	11.87	+2.13
6	Skeid	14	3	6	5	12	21	20	+1	13.15	-1.15
7	Lillestrom Relegated	14	4	3	7	11	29	33	-4	13.22	-2.22
8	Rapid Moss Relegated	14	3	2	9	8	19	42	-23	10.56	-2.56

Notes

Fredrikstad defeated Elk 2-0 in the championship final to win the league title.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Fredrikstad	22	16.90	+5.10
2	Greaker	16	12.93	+3.07
3	Eik Tonsberg	18	15.24	+2.76
4	Sandefjord	14	11.87	+2.13
5	Valerenga	14	12.85	+1.15

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Stavanger	11	15.89	-4.89
2	Rapid Moss	8	10.56	-2.56
3	Lillestrom	11	13.22	-2.22
4	Lisleby	13	14.72	-1.72
5	Skeid	12	13.15	-1.15

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Greaker	4	Aug 18 – Oct 2	1 in 54
2	Larvik Turn	3	Oct 9 – Apr 30	1 in 34
3	Valerenga	3	Sep 11 – Oct 9	1 in 31
4	Viking	3	Aug 17 – Sep 11	1 in 21
5	Eik Tonsberg	4	May 11 – May 28	1 in 20

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Valerenga	4	Oct 16 – May 14	1 in 72
2	Greaker	4	Oct 9 – May 7	1 in 56
3	Sandefjord	4	May 7 – May 22	1 in 35
4	Rosenborg	3	Sep 11 – Oct 16	1 in 33
5	Lillestrom	3	May 28 – Jun 11	1 in 22

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Strommen	4	Aug 21 – Oct 16	1 in 19
2	Valerenga	5	Aug 17 – Oct 9	1 in 15
3	Sandefjord	4	Jul 31 – Aug 21	1 in 12
4	Larvik Turn	5	Jul 31 – Sep 11	1 in 10
5	Viking	5	Jul 31 – Sep 11	1 in 10

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Lisleby	6	Aug 17 – Oct 16	1 in 24
2	Stavanger	5	Jul 31 – Sep 11	1 in 22
3	Skeid	6	Aug 17 – Apr 30	1 in 21
4	Valerenga	6	Oct 16 – Jun 4	1 in 14
5	IF Odd	7	Jul 31 – Apr 23	1 in 13

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team	Elo	Season Pts	Elo Δ (5)	Points (5)	Expected (5)	Actual − Exp
Fredrikstad	1499	22	+24	9	6.3	+2.7
Eik Tonsberg	1421	18	+15	8	5.8	+2.2
Lyn Oslo	1495	17	-5	5	6.4	-1.4
Greaker	1368	16	+6	6	4.3	+1.7
Rosenborg	1464	16	+1	6	6.1	-0.1
Viking	1389	14	+1	4	4.9	-0.9
Sandefjord	1360	14	+6	4	4.4	-0.4
Valerenga	1387	14	+10	3	4.8	-1.8
Larvik Turn	1367	14	-42	2	5.2	-3.2
Lisleby	1411	13	+7	6	4.9	+1.1
IF Odd	1362	13	-3	5	4.6	+0.4
Skeid	1384	12	+4	4	4.1	-0.1
Stavanger	1429	11	-10	5	5.2	-0.2
Strommen	1334	11	-1	4	4.5	-0.5
Lillestrom	1352	11	-25	2	5.0	-3.0
Rapid Moss	1283	8	-2	5	3.8	+1.2

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Group A

Team	FRE	IO	LT	LIS	STA	STR	VAL	VIK
Fredrikstad	—	2-0-0 3.66	0-1-1 3.26	2-0-0 3.08	1-1-0 3.00	2-0-0 3.69	1-0-1 3.62	2-0-0 3.33
IF Odd	0-0-2 1.86	—	1-0-1 2.43	0-2-0 2.29	1-1-0 1.97	1-0-1 2.91	1-1-0 2.66	0-1-1 2.37
Larvik Turn	1-1-0 2.24	1-0-1 3.07	—	1-0-1 2.66	0-2-0 2.40	0-2-0 3.27	0-0-2 2.94	1-1-0 2.75
Lisleby	0-0-2 2.43	0-2-0 3.22	1-0-1 2.84	—	0-0-2 2.59	1-1-0 3.37	2-0-0 3.10	1-0-1 2.81
Stavanger	0-1-1 2.50	0-1-1 3.54	0-2-0 3.11	2-0-0 2.91	—	0-1-1 3.53	1-0-1 3.32	0-0-2 3.22
Strommen	0-0-2 1.82	1-0-1 2.59	0-2-0 2.23	0-1-1 2.14	1-1-0 1.99	—	1-0-1 2.41	0-1-1 2.40
Valerenga	1-0-1 1.89	0-1-1 2.84	2-0-0 2.56	0-0-2 2.40	1-0-1 2.19	1-0-1 3.09	—	1-1-0 2.51
Viking	0-0-2 2.18	1-1-0 3.13	0-1-1 2.75	1-0-1 2.69	2-0-0 2.28	1-1-0 3.10	0-1-1 2.99	—

Group B

Team	ET	GRE	LIL	LO	RM	ROS	SAN	SKE
Eik Tonsberg	—	0-0-2 3.05	2-0-0 2.98	2-0-0 1.92	2-0-0 3.52	0-0-2 2.31	2-0-0 3.27	0-2-0 2.93
Greaker	2-0-0 2.45	—	1-0-1 2.86	0-0-2 1.88	1-0-1 3.32	2-0-0 2.09	0-0-2 3.03	2-0-0 2.76
Lillestrom	0-0-2 2.52	1-0-1 2.64	—	0-1-1 1.85	1-0-1 3.40	0-1-1 2.09	1-1-0 2.84	1-0-1 2.71
Lyn Oslo	0-0-2 3.59	2-0-0 3.63	1-1-0 3.67	—	2-0-0 4.08	1-0-1 2.95	1-0-1 3.91	0-2-0 3.68
Rapid Moss	0-0-2 1.99	1-0-1 2.19	1-0-1 2.11	0-0-2 1.46	—	0-1-1 1.56	1-0-1 2.38	0-1-1 2.24
Rosenborg	2-0-0 3.20	0-0-2 3.42	1-1-0 3.42	1-0-1 2.55	1-1-0 3.98	—	0-1-1 3.67	1-1-0 3.46
Sandefjord	0-0-2 2.23	2-0-0 2.47	0-1-1 2.66	1-0-1 1.62	1-0-1 3.12	1-1-0 1.85	—	1-0-1 2.63
Skeid	0-2-0 2.58	0-0-2 2.73	1-0-1 2.79	0-2-0 1.84	1-1-0 3.27	0-1-1 2.05	1-0-1 2.87	—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.62	+3.2
Allowed	0.21	-2.5
Differential	0.78	+2.8

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	2.68%	4.46%	2.68%	5.36%	1.79%	—	16.96%
1	4.46%	9.82%	8.93%	2.23%	2.23%	2.23%	29.91%
2	2.68%	8.93%	8.93%	1.79%	1.79%	2.23%	26.34%
3	5.36%	2.23%	1.79%	0.89%	1.34%	0.89%	12.50%
4	1.79%	2.23%	1.79%	1.34%	0.89%	—	8.04%
5+	—	2.23%	2.23%	0.89%	—	0.89%	6.25%
Total	16.96%	29.91%	26.34%	12.50%	8.04%	6.25%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.88	1.88	+0.00
SD	1.54	1.54	2.21
CV	0.82	0.82	—
Max	8	8	+7
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 112

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	14.29%	7.14%	—	—	—	21.43%
1	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
2	—	21.43%	7.14%	—	—	—	28.57%
3	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	21.43%
4	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
Total	—	64.29%	28.57%	—	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.50	1.50	+1.00
SD	2.18	0.85	2.29
CV	0.87	0.57	—
Max	8	4	+7
Min	0	1	-2

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
1	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
2	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	21.43%
3	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
4	—	21.43%	—	7.14%	—	—	28.57%
5+	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	21.43%
Total	21.43%	35.71%	21.43%	14.29%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	3.07	1.50	+1.57
SD	1.77	1.22	1.83
CV	0.58	0.82	—
Max	6	4	+4
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	14.29%	7.14%	—	21.43%
1	14.29%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	28.57%
2	7.14%	21.43%	—	—	—	—	28.57%
3	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	14.29%
4	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	21.43%	21.43%	21.43%	21.43%	14.29%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.57	1.86	-0.29
SD	1.22	1.41	2.02
CV	0.78	0.76	—
Max	4	4	+2
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
1	—	14.29%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	28.57%
2	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%	—	—	7.14%	35.71%
3	—	—	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%
4	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%
Total	14.29%	21.43%	35.71%	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.86	2.07	-0.21
SD	1.41	1.49	1.67
CV	0.76	0.72	—
Max	5	5	+2
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
1	—	14.29%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	28.57%
2	—	14.29%	21.43%	—	—	—	35.71%
3	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%	14.29%
4	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.14%	35.71%	42.86%	—	—	14.29%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.71	2.14	-0.43
SD	1.14	2.03	2.24
CV	0.66	0.95	—
Max	4	8	+2
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	21.43%	—	—	21.43%
1	—	—	14.29%	—	7.14%	—	21.43%
2	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	21.43%
3	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
4	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%	14.29%
Total	14.29%	14.29%	21.43%	28.57%	14.29%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.07	2.36	-0.29
SD	1.73	1.50	2.52
CV	0.84	0.64	—
Max	5	5	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
1	14.29%	14.29%	14.29%	14.29%	7.14%	—	64.29%
2	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	28.57%
3	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	21.43%	21.43%	28.57%	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.43	1.86	-0.43
SD	0.65	1.51	1.60
CV	0.45	0.81	—
Max	3	5	+2
Min	1	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%
1	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
2	—	—	14.29%	—	—	7.14%	21.43%
3	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	28.57%
4	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
5+	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
Total	14.29%	21.43%	35.71%	21.43%	—	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.93	1.93	+1.00
SD	1.98	1.33	2.77
CV	0.68	0.69	—
Max	8	5	+6
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
1	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	14.29%	35.71%
2	—	21.43%	7.14%	14.29%	—	7.14%	50.00%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	—	35.71%	14.29%	28.57%	—	21.43%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.36	3.00	-1.64
SD	0.74	2.42	2.53
CV	0.55	0.81	—
Max	2	8	+1
Min	0	1	-7

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
1	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	35.71%
2	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	—	7.14%	42.86%
3	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
4	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	14.29%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	28.57%	14.29%	21.43%	14.29%	7.14%	14.29%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.00	2.00	+0.00
SD	1.04	1.80	1.84
CV	0.52	0.90	—
Max	4	5	+3
Min	1	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	14.29%	—	14.29%
1	—	—	21.43%	—	7.14%	—	28.57%
2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
3	28.57%	—	—	—	—	—	28.57%
4	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	14.29%
5+	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	14.29%
Total	28.57%	—	28.57%	7.14%	28.57%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.43	2.29	+0.14
SD	1.74	1.77	2.63
CV	0.72	0.78	—
Max	5	5	+3
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	21.43%
1	—	21.43%	14.29%	—	—	—	35.71%
2	—	—	21.43%	—	—	—	21.43%
3	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
4	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	14.29%	35.71%	42.86%	7.14%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.50	1.43	+0.07
SD	1.22	0.85	1.86
CV	0.82	0.60	—
Max	4	3	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	35.71%
1	—	14.29%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	28.57%
2	—	14.29%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	28.57%
3	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	21.43%	35.71%	21.43%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.07	1.64	-0.57
SD	1.00	1.50	1.79
CV	0.93	0.91	—
Max	3	5	+3
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	35.71%
1	7.14%	28.57%	—	—	—	—	35.71%
2	7.14%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	21.43%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	14.29%	42.86%	21.43%	14.29%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.14	1.57	-0.43
SD	1.35	1.16	1.83
CV	1.18	0.74	—
Max	5	4	+3
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	14.29%	—	7.14%	—	—	28.57%
1	7.14%	7.14%	21.43%	—	—	—	35.71%
2	—	14.29%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
3	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
4	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	21.43%	42.86%	28.57%	7.14%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.71	1.21	+0.50
SD	2.16	0.89	2.41
CV	1.26	0.74	—
Max	8	3	+7
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
1	7.14%	21.43%	—	—	7.14%	—	35.71%
2	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	21.43%
3	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%	21.43%
4	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	28.57%	35.71%	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.71	1.71	+0.00
SD	1.20	1.86	2.25
CV	0.70	1.08	—
Max	4	6	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Fredrikstad	1505	22	16.90	+5.10	99.0%	7	11	15	17	19	22	23
Lyn Oslo	1487	17	18.03	-1.03	49.0%	10	13	16	18	20	22	25
Rosenborg	1464	16	17.00	-1.00	43.0%	11	12	15	17	19	22	27
Stavanger	1429	11	15.89	-4.89	11.0%	10	10	13	15	19	22	23
Eik Tonsberg	1415	18	15.24	+2.76	85.0%	7	10	14	15	17	20	22
Lisleby	1411	13	14.72	-1.72	40.0%	7	10	12	15	17	20	23
Valerenga	1394	14	12.85	+1.15	77.0%	5	8	11	13	14	18	23
Viking	1389	14	13.89	+0.11	56.0%	8	8	12	14	16	19	21
Skeid	1384	12	13.15	-1.15	40.0%	6	8	11	13	15	19	22
Greaker	1368	16	12.93	+3.07	89.0%	5	8	11	13	15	18	22
Larvik Turn	1367	14	14.59	-0.59	51.0%	7	9	12	14	17	20	21
IF Odd	1362	13	11.95	+1.05	69.0%	5	7	10	12	14	17	19
Sandefjord	1360	14	11.87	+2.13	83.0%	5	7	10	12	14	17	20
Lillestrom	1352	11	13.22	-2.22	33.0%	3	7	11	13	16	19	20
Strommen	1334	11	11.21	-0.21	54.0%	5	7	9	11	13	16	19
Rapid Moss	1283	8	10.56	-2.56	26.0%	3	6	8	11	13	15	20

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 14.5% * Slight Edge: 14.5% to 17.5% * Clear Edge: 17.5% to 23% * Strong Edge: 23% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+4.46%

No Edge

40.18%24.11%35.71%

Elo Value

Home Edge: 15.52 Elo pts.

190 Elo

0.005 goals per Elo point

0500

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.37 goals

Neutral

-2+0.08+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 8th * Longshot: 9th or lower.
Title Margin: Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.09 * Tight Race: 0.09 to 0.21 * Comfortable: 0.21 to 0.29 * Runaway: 0.29 and up.

Title-Race Openness

8.3

Wide Open

134611

Champion Preseason Odds

34%

Fredrikstad, 2nd of 16

LongshotFavorite

Title Margin

Expected

0.29/gm

Comfortable

00.130.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.5 * Some Luck: 2.5 to 3.75 * Lucky: 3.75 to 4.99 * Wild Swing: 4.99 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 2.69 * Close: 2.69 to 4.03 * Off: 4.03 to 5.37 * Way Off: 5.37 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 16 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 16 typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 16 * As Expected: 16 to 25.6 * Several Outliers: 25.6 to 35.2 * Many Outliers: 35.2 and up.
Unexpected Relegations: Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 2.05 * A Surprise: 2.05 to 3.28 * Several Surprises: 3.28 to 4.51 * Many Surprises: 4.51 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

2.40 points

As Expected

03.128

Average Finish Error

Expected

3.50

03.368

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 96.88%

99.00%

Fredrikstad

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 3.12%

11.00%

Stavanger

050

Season Outliers

Expected

1 of 16

Minimal Outliers

01.68

Unexpected Relegations

Expected

2 of 4

As Expected

02.04

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.14 * Even: 0.14 to 0.16 * Top-Heavy: 0.16 to 0.19 * Lopsided: 0.19 and up.
Noll-Scully: Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.55 * Strong Separation: 1.55 to 1.75 * Wide Separation: 1.75 and up.
Interquartile Edge: Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 61.5% * Slight Edge: 61.5% to 65% * Clear Edge: 65% to 69.5% * Wide Edge: 69.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst: Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82% * Clear Edge: 82% to 87.5% * Strong Edge: 87.5% to 92.5% * Dominant: 92.5% and up.
Close Games: Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 53.5% * Some Drama: 53.5% to 58% * Frequent: 58% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts: Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16% * Occasional: 16% to 19% * Frequent: 19% to 25% * Very Frequent: 25% and up.

Gini Index

0.12

Balanced

00.140.5

Noll-Scully

Elo SD: 57.60

1.02

Coin-Flip Parity

0.91.351.551.752.5

Interquartile Edge

59%

Even

50%61.5%69.5%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline

78%

Even

50%77%100%

Close Games

Expected

57%

Some Drama

0%50%100%

Blowouts

Expected

29%

Very Frequent

0%26%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.32 * Slight Separation: 0.32 to 0.34 * Notable Separation: 0.34 to 0.38 * Lopsided: 0.38 and up.
Strangeness: How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.28 * Some Carryover: 0.28 to 0.48 * Strong Carryover: 0.48 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23.5% * As Expected: 23.5% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 27.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 27.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19% * As Expected: 19% to 22% * Shaky Favorites: 22% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.65

Hard to Predict

00.632

Matchup Imbalance

0.24

Very Even

00.320.380.5

Strangeness

Expected

0.57

Very Predictable

01.002

Repeatability

0.47

Some Carryover

00.280.481

Upset Rate

Expected

33%

Very Upset-Prone

0%28%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

27%

Very Shaky

0%24%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.15 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.15 to 0.23 * Above Noise: 0.23 to 0.3 * Well Above Noise: 0.3 and up.

Probability calibration

0.89

Excellent

0.010.050.10.51

Calibration slope

Ideal

0.61

Overconfident

0.4906531.001.50935

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.061

Well Within Noise

00.1510.4

Promotion Playoff

The path the promotion-playoff teams took to determine the final promotion spot. The sections below show matchup heatmaps and round-by-round simulation outcomes.

Finals

Valerenga 6

Lyn Oslo 4

Fredrikstad 2

Eik Tonsberg 0

Sim: 4.0%

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Fredrikstad	34.00%	27.00%	16.00%	13.00%	4.00%	2.00%	2.00%	2.00%
Valerenga	5.00%	7.00%	10.00%	14.00%	18.00%	16.00%	21.00%	9.00%
Viking	11.00%	8.00%	20.00%	15.00%	14.00%	13.00%	11.00%	8.00%
Larvik Turn	13.00%	14.00%	15.00%	10.00%	16.00%	14.00%	10.00%	8.00%
IF Odd	3.00%	8.00%	5.00%	12.00%	15.00%	17.00%	14.00%	26.00%
Lisleby	11.00%	16.00%	14.00%	16.00%	9.00%	16.00%	13.00%	5.00%
Strommen	1.00%	1.00%	10.00%	7.00%	14.00%	13.00%	15.00%	39.00%
Stavanger	22.00%	19.00%	10.00%	13.00%	10.00%	9.00%	14.00%	3.00%

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Eik Tonsberg	18.00%	17.00%	21.00%	18.00%	8.00%	9.00%	5.00%	4.00%
Lyn Oslo	39.00%	28.00%	18.00%	9.00%	3.00%	2.00%	1.00%	—
Rosenborg	29.00%	23.00%	23.00%	14.00%	5.00%	—	6.00%	—
Greaker	4.00%	7.00%	7.00%	13.00%	20.00%	21.00%	17.00%	11.00%
Sandefjord	3.00%	5.00%	4.00%	10.00%	22.00%	20.00%	17.00%	19.00%
Skeid	4.00%	7.00%	10.00%	20.00%	18.00%	16.00%	14.00%	11.00%
Lillestrom	3.00%	11.00%	14.00%	12.00%	16.00%	14.00%	19.00%	11.00%
Rapid Moss	—	2.00%	3.00%	4.00%	8.00%	18.00%	21.00%	44.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Stochastic Promotion/Relegation Outcomes

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations from preseason Elo, the probability of each team's next-season outcome — promotion-positive outcomes on the left, relegation-positive on the right. The round buttons switch to heatmaps of how often each pair of teams met in that round of the playoff across the simulations, since every iteration produces a different field.

Team	Same level	Direct relegation
Eik Tonsberg	—	—
Fredrikstad	—	—
Lyn Oslo	60.00%	1.00%
Rosenborg	65.00%	6.00%
Stavanger	61.00%	17.00%
Larvik Turn	69.00%	18.00%
Lisleby	71.00%	18.00%
Viking	70.00%	19.00%
Skeid	71.00%	25.00%
Greaker	68.00%	28.00%
Lillestrom	67.00%	30.00%
Valerenga	65.00%	30.00%
Sandefjord	61.00%	36.00%
IF Odd	57.00%	40.00%
Strommen	45.00%	54.00%
Rapid Moss	35.00%	65.00%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Eik Tonsberg	Fredrikstad	Greaker	IF Odd	Larvik Turn	Lillestrom	Lisleby	Lyn Oslo	Rosenborg	Sandefjord	Skeid	Stavanger	Strommen	Valerenga	Viking
Eik Tonsberg		33.3%6.00%		0.0%1.00%	0.0%1.00%		100.0%1.00%					100.0%2.00%	0.0%1.00%	0.0%1.00%	0.0%1.00%
Fredrikstad	66.7%6.00%		66.7%3.00%			100.0%2.00%		47.8%23.00%	60.0%5.00%	100.0%3.00%	0.0%1.00%
Greaker		33.3%3.00%			0.0%2.00%		100.0%2.00%						0.0%1.00%
IF Odd	100.0%1.00%							0.0%4.00%
Larvik Turn	100.0%1.00%		100.0%2.00%			100.0%1.00%		0.0%4.00%
Lillestrom		0.0%2.00%			0.0%1.00%		0.0%2.00%							0.0%1.00%	0.0%1.00%
Lisleby	0.0%1.00%		0.0%2.00%			100.0%2.00%		0.0%3.00%	50.0%2.00%	0.0%1.00%
Lyn Oslo		52.2%23.00%		100.0%4.00%	100.0%4.00%		100.0%3.00%					71.4%7.00%	100.0%1.00%	100.0%1.00%	100.0%5.00%
Rosenborg		40.0%5.00%					50.0%2.00%					75.0%4.00%		50.0%2.00%	66.7%3.00%
Sandefjord		0.0%3.00%					100.0%1.00%
Skeid		100.0%1.00%										0.0%1.00%		100.0%1.00%
Stavanger	0.0%2.00%							28.6%7.00%	25.0%4.00%		100.0%1.00%
Strommen	100.0%1.00%		100.0%1.00%					0.0%1.00%
Valerenga	100.0%1.00%					100.0%1.00%		0.0%1.00%	50.0%2.00%		0.0%1.00%
Viking	100.0%1.00%					100.0%1.00%		0.0%5.00%	33.3%3.00%

Actual Promotion/Relegation Outcomes

Just the teams that actually reached the promotion playoff. With the field fixed in place, the playoff sim re-runs every tie and tallies how often each team won each round — the table gives those probabilities, and the final round's column is the chance of winning the playoff outright. The round buttons switch to heatmaps of how often each pairing met in that round.

Team	Finals
Fredrikstad	69.00%
Eik Tonsberg	31.00%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Eik Tonsberg	Fredrikstad
Eik Tonsberg		31.0%100.00%
Fredrikstad	69.0%100.00%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
1960-07-31	Fredrikstad	D 2-2	59.9	1388	1441	35.18%	25.07%	39.75%	-0.20	+0.1	1
1960-07-31	@ Larvik Turn	D 2-2	59.9	1441	1388	39.75%	25.07%	35.18%	+0.20	-0.1	1
1960-07-31	IF Odd	D 2-2	59.2	1430	1361	51.49%	24.54%	23.98%	+0.45	-0.6	1
1960-07-31	@ Lisleby	D 2-2	59.2	1361	1430	23.98%	24.54%	51.49%	-0.45	+0.6	1
1960-07-31	Valerenga	L 1-2	54.9	1471	1359	56.37%	23.89%	19.73%	+0.67	-6.6	0
1960-07-31	@ Stavanger	W 2-1	54.9	1359	1471	19.73%	23.89%	56.37%	-0.67	+6.6	2
1960-07-31	Viking	L 0-4	37.0	1349	1378	38.62%	25.12%	36.26%	-0.07	-18.1	0
1960-07-31	@ Strommen	W 4-0	37.0	1378	1349	36.26%	25.12%	38.62%	+0.07	+18.2	2
1960-07-31	Lillestrom	W 4-2	47.4	1377	1368	43.91%	25.04%	31.04%	+0.13	+6.3	2
1960-07-31	@ Greaker	L 2-4	47.4	1368	1377	31.04%	25.04%	43.91%	-0.13	-6.3	0
1960-07-31	Rapid Moss	W 8-2	36.4	1484	1332	60.40%	23.12%	16.47%	+0.88	+8.9	2
1960-07-31	@ Lyn Oslo	L 2-8	36.4	1332	1484	16.47%	23.12%	60.40%	-0.88	-8.9	0
1960-07-31	Sandefjord	D 4-4	66.9	1471	1335	58.87%	23.44%	17.69%	+0.80	-0.6	1
1960-07-31	@ Rosenborg	D 4-4	66.9	1335	1471	17.69%	23.44%	58.87%	-0.80	+0.6	1
1960-08-02	Eik Tonsberg	D 1-1	53.9	1379	1380	42.54%	25.08%	32.37%	+0.08	-0.3	1
1960-08-02	@ Skeid	D 1-1	53.9	1380	1379	32.37%	25.08%	42.54%	-0.08	+0.3	1
1960-08-07	Strommen	W 3-0	33.0	1441	1331	56.06%	23.94%	20.00%	+0.66	+8.2	3
1960-08-07	@ Fredrikstad	L 0-3	33.0	1331	1441	20.00%	23.94%	56.06%	-0.66	-8.2	0
1960-08-07	Stavanger	D 1-1	55.5	1361	1465	28.61%	24.71%	46.69%	-0.46	+0.5	2
1960-08-07	@ IF Odd	D 1-1	55.5	1465	1361	46.69%	24.71%	28.61%	+0.46	-0.5	1
1960-08-07	Lisleby	L 1-2	47.6	1365	1429	33.68%	25.02%	41.30%	-0.25	-4.3	2
1960-08-07	@ Valerenga	W 2-1	47.6	1429	1365	41.30%	25.02%	33.68%	+0.25	+4.3	3
1960-08-07	Larvik Turn	D 1-1	54.4	1396	1388	43.73%	25.05%	31.22%	+0.12	-0.3	3
1960-08-07	@ Viking	D 1-1	54.4	1388	1396	31.22%	25.05%	43.73%	-0.12	+0.3	2
1960-08-07	Lyn Oslo	W 5-2	52.3	1380	1493	27.46%	24.60%	47.94%	-0.51	+12.1	3
1960-08-07	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 2-5	52.3	1493	1380	47.94%	24.60%	27.46%	+0.51	-12.1	2
1960-08-07	Rosenborg	D 2-2	60.1	1361	1471	27.90%	24.64%	47.45%	-0.49	+0.4	1
1960-08-07	@ Lillestrom	D 2-2	60.1	1471	1361	47.45%	24.64%	27.90%	+0.49	-0.4	2
1960-08-07	Skeid	L 1-3	43.6	1323	1379	34.83%	25.06%	40.12%	-0.21	-7.7	0
1960-08-07	@ Rapid Moss	W 3-1	43.6	1379	1323	40.12%	25.06%	34.83%	+0.21	+7.7	3
1960-08-07	Greaker	W 4-3	55.9	1336	1383	35.90%	25.09%	39.02%	-0.17	+4.5	3
1960-08-07	@ Sandefjord	L 3-4	55.9	1383	1336	39.02%	25.09%	35.90%	+0.17	-4.5	2
1960-08-17	IF Odd	W 2-1	45.2	1388	1362	46.15%	24.95%	28.90%	+0.22	+3.8	4
1960-08-17	@ Larvik Turn	L 1-2	45.2	1362	1388	28.90%	24.95%	46.15%	-0.22	-3.8	2
1960-08-17	Fredrikstad	L 1-4	46.9	1434	1449	40.53%	25.12%	34.36%	+0.00	-12.2	3
1960-08-17	@ Lisleby	W 4-1	46.9	1449	1434	34.36%	25.12%	40.53%	+0.00	+12.2	5
1960-08-17	Viking	L 0-1	50.5	1464	1396	51.41%	24.54%	24.05%	+0.44	-6.4	1
1960-08-17	@ Stavanger	W 1-0	50.5	1396	1464	24.05%	24.54%	51.41%	-0.44	+6.4	5
1960-08-17	Valerenga	L 0-1	42.9	1323	1361	37.27%	25.11%	37.62%	-0.12	-4.9	0
1960-08-17	@ Strommen	W 1-0	42.9	1361	1323	37.62%	25.11%	37.27%	+0.12	+4.9	4
1960-08-17	Eik Tonsberg	W 4-3	54.0	1470	1392	52.57%	24.42%	23.01%	+0.49	+2.9	4
1960-08-17	@ Rosenborg	L 3-4	54.0	1392	1470	23.01%	24.42%	52.57%	-0.49	-2.9	3
1960-08-17	Sandefjord	L 0-3	41.1	1386	1340	48.70%	24.78%	26.52%	+0.33	-16.8	3
1960-08-17	@ Skeid	W 3-0	41.1	1340	1386	26.52%	24.78%	48.70%	-0.33	+16.8	5
1960-08-18	Rapid Moss	W 2-1	43.0	1379	1316	50.78%	24.61%	24.61%	+0.41	+3.3	4
1960-08-18	@ Greaker	L 1-2	43.0	1316	1379	24.61%	24.61%	50.78%	-0.41	-3.4	0
1960-08-18	Lillestrom	D 3-3	64.9	1481	1362	57.10%	23.77%	19.13%	+0.71	-0.7	3
1960-08-18	@ Lyn Oslo	D 3-3	64.9	1362	1481	19.13%	23.77%	57.10%	-0.71	+0.7	2
1960-08-21	Stavanger	W 5-1	44.0	1461	1458	43.03%	25.07%	31.89%	+0.10	+13.1	7
1960-08-21	@ Fredrikstad	L 1-5	44.0	1458	1461	31.89%	25.07%	43.03%	-0.10	-13.1	1
1960-08-21	Valerenga	D 0-0	50.2	1358	1366	41.50%	25.10%	33.40%	+0.04	-0.2	3
1960-08-21	@ IF Odd	D 0-0	50.2	1366	1358	33.40%	25.10%	41.50%	-0.04	+0.2	5
1960-08-21	Larvik Turn	D 2-2	57.6	1318	1392	32.34%	24.96%	42.70%	-0.31	+0.2	1
1960-08-21	@ Strommen	D 2-2	57.6	1392	1318	42.70%	24.96%	32.34%	+0.31	-0.2	5
1960-08-21	Lisleby	W 3-1	46.0	1402	1422	39.93%	25.12%	34.95%	-0.02	+7.7	7
1960-08-21	@ Viking	L 1-3	46.0	1422	1402	34.95%	25.12%	39.93%	+0.02	-7.7	3
1960-08-21	Greaker	L 0-1	46.1	1389	1382	43.52%	25.06%	31.42%	+0.12	-5.6	3
1960-08-21	@ Eik Tonsberg	W 1-0	46.1	1382	1389	31.42%	25.06%	43.52%	-0.12	+5.6	6
1960-08-21	Skeid	D 2-2	60.8	1480	1370	56.18%	23.92%	19.90%	+0.66	-0.8	4
1960-08-21	@ Lyn Oslo	D 2-2	60.8	1370	1480	19.90%	23.92%	56.18%	-0.66	+0.8	4
1960-08-21	Rosenborg	L 0-1	39.7	1312	1473	22.30%	23.90%	53.80%	-0.77	-3.2	0
1960-08-21	@ Rapid Moss	W 1-0	39.7	1473	1312	53.80%	23.90%	22.30%	+0.77	+3.2	6
1960-08-21	Lillestrom	D 5-5	66.1	1357	1362	41.85%	25.10%	33.05%	+0.05	-0.1	6
1960-08-21	@ Sandefjord	D 5-5	66.1	1362	1357	33.05%	25.10%	41.85%	-0.05	+0.1	3
1960-09-04	Greaker	L 1-2	48.8	1370	1388	40.21%	25.12%	34.67%	-0.01	-4.9	4
1960-09-04	@ Skeid	W 2-1	48.8	1388	1370	34.67%	25.12%	40.21%	+0.01	+4.9	8
1960-09-11	Stavanger	D 0-0	52.5	1392	1445	35.18%	25.07%	39.75%	-0.20	+0.1	6
1960-09-11	@ Larvik Turn	D 0-0	52.5	1445	1392	39.75%	25.07%	35.18%	+0.20	-0.1	2
1960-09-11	Strommen	D 1-1	53.7	1414	1318	54.52%	24.17%	21.31%	+0.58	-0.9	4
1960-09-11	@ Lisleby	D 1-1	53.7	1318	1414	21.31%	24.17%	54.52%	-0.58	+0.9	2
1960-09-11	Fredrikstad	W 4-2	54.2	1366	1474	28.11%	24.66%	47.23%	-0.48	+8.7	7
1960-09-11	@ Valerenga	L 2-4	54.2	1474	1366	47.23%	24.66%	28.11%	+0.48	-8.7	7
1960-09-11	IF Odd	W 2-0	37.4	1410	1358	49.41%	24.73%	25.86%	+0.36	+7.0	9
1960-09-11	@ Viking	L 0-2	37.4	1358	1410	25.86%	24.73%	49.41%	-0.36	-7.0	3
1960-09-11	Eik Tonsberg	L 1-2	48.4	1362	1383	39.72%	25.12%	35.16%	-0.03	-4.9	3
1960-09-11	@ Lillestrom	W 2-1	48.4	1383	1362	35.16%	25.12%	39.72%	+0.03	+4.9	5
1960-09-11	Sandefjord	W 2-1	47.1	1309	1357	35.92%	25.09%	38.99%	-0.17	+4.8	2
1960-09-11	@ Rapid Moss	L 1-2	47.1	1357	1309	38.99%	25.09%	35.92%	+0.17	-4.8	6
1960-09-11	Lyn Oslo	L 1-5	48.4	1477	1480	42.20%	25.09%	32.71%	+0.07	-16.2	6
1960-09-11	@ Rosenborg	W 5-1	48.4	1480	1477	32.71%	25.09%	42.20%	-0.07	+16.2	6
1960-10-02	Viking	W 4-1	42.5	1465	1417	48.96%	24.76%	26.27%	+0.34	+8.7	9
1960-10-02	@ Fredrikstad	L 1-4	42.5	1417	1465	26.27%	24.76%	48.96%	-0.34	-8.7	9
1960-10-02	Valerenga	L 1-2	50.3	1392	1375	44.91%	25.01%	30.09%	+0.17	-5.4	6
1960-10-02	@ Larvik Turn	W 2-1	50.3	1375	1392	30.09%	25.01%	44.91%	-0.17	+5.4	9
1960-10-02	Lisleby	W 2-1	47.5	1445	1413	46.84%	24.91%	28.25%	+0.25	+3.8	4
1960-10-02	@ Stavanger	L 1-2	47.5	1413	1445	28.25%	24.91%	46.84%	-0.25	-3.8	4
1960-10-02	Rapid Moss	W 8-1	35.5	1388	1314	52.11%	24.47%	23.42%	+0.47	+17.0	7
1960-10-02	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-8	35.5	1314	1388	23.42%	24.47%	52.11%	-0.47	-17.0	2
1960-10-02	Rosenborg	W 3-2	56.0	1393	1460	33.20%	25.00%	41.81%	-0.27	+4.8	10
1960-10-02	@ Greaker	L 2-3	56.0	1460	1393	41.81%	25.00%	33.20%	+0.27	-4.8	6
1960-10-02	Sandefjord	W 4-1	38.3	1496	1352	59.61%	23.29%	17.09%	+0.84	+6.0	8
1960-10-02	@ Lyn Oslo	L 1-4	38.3	1352	1496	17.09%	23.29%	59.61%	-0.84	-6.0	6
1960-10-02	Lillestrom	L 1-2	49.3	1366	1358	43.69%	25.05%	31.26%	+0.12	-5.3	4
1960-10-02	@ Skeid	W 2-1	49.3	1358	1366	31.26%	25.05%	43.69%	-0.12	+5.3	5
1960-10-09	Larvik Turn	L 1-3	48.5	1409	1387	45.64%	24.97%	29.38%	+0.20	-9.5	4
1960-10-09	@ Lisleby	W 3-1	48.5	1387	1409	29.38%	24.97%	45.64%	-0.20	+9.5	8
1960-10-09	Strommen	L 0-2	46.8	1449	1319	58.13%	23.58%	18.28%	+0.76	-13.5	4
1960-10-09	@ Stavanger	W 2-0	46.8	1319	1449	18.28%	23.58%	58.13%	-0.76	+13.5	4
1960-10-09	Viking	W 3-0	38.6	1380	1408	38.75%	25.12%	36.13%	-0.06	+13.2	11
1960-10-09	@ Valerenga	L 0-3	38.6	1408	1380	36.13%	25.12%	38.75%	+0.06	-13.2	9
1960-10-09	Lyn Oslo	L 1-3	46.1	1398	1502	28.54%	24.70%	46.76%	-0.47	-6.5	10
1960-10-09	@ Greaker	W 3-1	46.1	1502	1398	46.76%	24.70%	28.54%	+0.47	+6.5	10
1960-10-09	Rapid Moss	W 5-1	36.0	1363	1297	51.11%	24.57%	24.31%	+0.43	+10.5	7
1960-10-09	@ Lillestrom	L 1-5	36.0	1297	1363	24.31%	24.57%	51.11%	-0.43	-10.5	2
1960-10-16	Larvik Turn	L 1-2	55.0	1474	1396	52.52%	24.42%	23.06%	+0.49	-6.2	9
1960-10-16	@ Fredrikstad	W 2-1	55.0	1396	1474	23.06%	24.42%	52.52%	-0.49	+6.2	10
1960-10-16	Lisleby	D 1-1	53.8	1351	1400	35.73%	25.08%	39.19%	-0.18	+0.1	4
1960-10-16	@ IF Odd	D 1-1	53.8	1400	1351	39.19%	25.08%	35.73%	+0.18	-0.1	5
1960-10-16	Stavanger	L 0-3	39.7	1394	1435	36.80%	25.10%	38.09%	-0.14	-13.4	11
1960-10-16	@ Valerenga	W 3-0	39.7	1435	1394	38.09%	25.10%	36.80%	+0.14	+13.4	6
1960-10-16	Strommen	D 1-1	53.5	1395	1333	50.65%	24.62%	24.73%	+0.41	-0.7	10
1960-10-16	@ Viking	D 1-1	53.5	1333	1395	24.73%	24.62%	50.65%	-0.41	+0.7	5
1960-10-16	Skeid	D 2-2	58.6	1405	1360	48.53%	24.80%	26.68%	+0.32	-0.4	8
1960-10-16	@ Eik Tonsberg	D 2-2	58.6	1360	1405	26.68%	24.80%	48.53%	-0.32	+0.4	5
1960-10-16	Greaker	W 3-0	37.7	1373	1391	40.17%	25.12%	34.71%	-0.01	+12.8	9
1960-10-16	@ Lillestrom	L 0-3	37.7	1391	1373	34.71%	25.12%	40.17%	+0.01	-12.8	10
1960-10-16	Lyn Oslo	L 2-3	46.4	1286	1508	16.97%	22.66%	60.37%	-1.09	-2.3	2
1960-10-16	@ Rapid Moss	W 3-2	46.4	1508	1286	60.37%	22.66%	16.97%	+1.09	+2.3	12
1960-10-16	Rosenborg	W 5-2	50.2	1346	1456	27.88%	24.64%	47.48%	-0.49	+12.0	8
1960-10-16	@ Sandefjord	L 2-5	50.2	1456	1346	47.48%	24.64%	27.88%	+0.49	-11.9	6
1961-04-23	Fredrikstad	L 3-4	54.1	1351	1468	27.01%	24.55%	48.44%	-0.53	-3.3	4
1961-04-23	@ IF Odd	W 4-3	54.1	1468	1351	48.44%	24.55%	27.01%	+0.53	+3.3	11
1961-04-30	Viking	W 4-2	48.4	1402	1394	43.70%	25.05%	31.25%	+0.12	+6.3	12
1961-04-30	@ Larvik Turn	L 2-4	48.4	1394	1402	31.25%	25.05%	43.70%	-0.12	-6.3	10
1961-04-30	Valerenga	W 1-0	42.1	1400	1380	45.23%	24.99%	29.78%	+0.18	+4.2	7
1961-04-30	@ Lisleby	L 0-1	42.1	1380	1400	29.78%	24.99%	45.23%	-0.18	-4.2	11
1961-04-30	IF Odd	L 2-4	55.3	1448	1347	55.12%	24.08%	20.80%	+0.61	-10.0	6
1961-04-30	@ Stavanger	W 4-2	55.3	1347	1448	20.80%	24.08%	55.12%	-0.61	+10.0	6
1961-04-30	Fredrikstad	L 0-1	40.9	1333	1471	24.70%	24.27%	51.03%	-0.64	-3.6	5
1961-04-30	@ Strommen	W 1-0	40.9	1471	1333	51.03%	24.27%	24.70%	+0.64	+3.6	13
1961-04-30	Sandefjord	L 0-3	40.3	1378	1358	45.36%	24.99%	29.65%	+0.19	-15.8	10
1961-04-30	@ Greaker	W 3-0	40.3	1358	1378	29.65%	24.99%	45.36%	-0.19	+15.8	10
1961-04-30	Eik Tonsberg	L 1-3	54.5	1511	1405	55.64%	24.01%	20.35%	+0.64	-11.2	12
1961-04-30	@ Lyn Oslo	W 3-1	54.5	1405	1511	20.35%	24.01%	55.64%	-0.64	+11.2	10
1961-04-30	Lillestrom	W 3-0	36.1	1444	1386	50.06%	24.67%	25.27%	+0.38	+10.0	8
1961-04-30	@ Rosenborg	L 0-3	36.1	1386	1444	25.27%	24.67%	50.06%	-0.38	-10.0	9
1961-04-30	Rapid Moss	D 1-1	52.6	1361	1284	52.37%	24.44%	23.19%	+0.48	-0.8	6
1961-04-30	@ Skeid	D 1-1	52.6	1284	1361	23.19%	24.44%	52.37%	-0.48	+0.8	3
1961-05-07	Lisleby	W 5-2	45.2	1475	1404	51.69%	24.51%	23.79%	+0.45	+6.9	15
1961-05-07	@ Fredrikstad	L 2-5	45.2	1404	1475	23.79%	24.51%	51.69%	-0.45	-6.9	7
1961-05-07	Larvik Turn	W 5-3	53.0	1357	1409	35.44%	25.07%	39.48%	-0.19	+7.1	8
1961-05-07	@ IF Odd	L 3-5	53.0	1409	1357	39.48%	25.07%	35.44%	+0.19	-7.1	12
1961-05-07	Strommen	L 0-1	46.5	1376	1330	48.67%	24.79%	26.54%	+0.32	-6.1	11
1961-05-07	@ Valerenga	W 1-0	46.5	1330	1376	26.54%	24.79%	48.67%	-0.32	+6.1	7
1961-05-07	Stavanger	W 3-0	40.4	1388	1438	35.53%	25.08%	39.39%	-0.18	+14.1	12
1961-05-07	@ Viking	L 0-3	40.4	1438	1388	39.39%	25.08%	35.53%	+0.18	-14.1	6
1961-05-07	Rosenborg	L 0-2	43.5	1416	1454	37.36%	25.11%	37.52%	-0.12	-9.3	10
1961-05-07	@ Eik Tonsberg	W 2-0	43.5	1454	1416	37.52%	25.11%	37.36%	+0.12	+9.3	10
1961-05-07	Lyn Oslo	L 0-3	37.7	1376	1499	26.32%	24.48%	49.20%	-0.57	-10.3	9
1961-05-07	@ Lillestrom	W 3-0	37.7	1499	1376	49.20%	24.48%	26.32%	+0.57	+10.3	14
1961-05-07	Greaker	W 2-1	48.2	1285	1362	31.86%	24.93%	43.21%	-0.33	+5.2	5
1961-05-07	@ Rapid Moss	L 1-2	48.2	1362	1285	43.21%	24.93%	31.86%	+0.33	-5.2	10
1961-05-07	Skeid	L 0-4	38.8	1374	1360	44.47%	25.02%	30.51%	+0.15	-20.3	10
1961-05-07	@ Sandefjord	W 4-0	38.8	1360	1374	30.51%	25.02%	44.47%	-0.15	+20.3	8
1961-05-11	IF Odd	W 5-2	45.2	1336	1365	38.64%	25.12%	36.24%	-0.07	+9.7	9
1961-05-11	@ Strommen	L 2-5	45.2	1365	1336	36.24%	25.12%	38.64%	+0.07	-9.7	8
1961-05-11	Skeid	W 1-0	41.3	1463	1380	53.06%	24.36%	22.58%	+0.52	+3.3	12
1961-05-11	@ Rosenborg	L 0-1	41.3	1380	1463	22.58%	24.36%	53.06%	-0.52	-3.3	8
1961-05-11	Eik Tonsberg	L 1-2	47.3	1353	1407	35.12%	25.07%	39.82%	-0.20	-4.5	10
1961-05-11	@ Sandefjord	W 2-1	47.3	1407	1353	39.82%	25.07%	35.12%	+0.20	+4.5	12
1961-05-14	Strommen	D 1-1	53.8	1401	1346	49.86%	24.69%	25.45%	+0.37	-0.7	13
1961-05-14	@ Larvik Turn	D 1-1	53.8	1346	1401	25.45%	24.69%	49.86%	-0.37	+0.7	10
1961-05-14	Viking	W 1-0	43.5	1397	1402	41.91%	25.10%	32.99%	+0.05	+4.5	9
1961-05-14	@ Lisleby	L 0-1	43.5	1402	1397	32.99%	25.10%	41.91%	-0.05	-4.5	12
1961-05-14	Fredrikstad	D 0-0	54.6	1424	1482	34.58%	25.05%	40.37%	-0.22	+0.2	7
1961-05-14	@ Stavanger	D 0-0	54.6	1482	1424	40.37%	25.05%	34.58%	+0.22	-0.2	16
1961-05-14	IF Odd	L 1-2	49.6	1370	1355	44.65%	25.02%	30.33%	+0.16	-5.4	11
1961-05-14	@ Valerenga	W 2-1	49.6	1355	1370	30.33%	25.02%	44.65%	-0.16	+5.4	10
1961-05-14	Sandefjord	W 4-0	34.2	1366	1349	44.92%	25.00%	30.08%	+0.17	+15.0	11
1961-05-14	@ Lillestrom	L 0-4	34.2	1349	1366	30.08%	25.00%	44.92%	-0.17	-15.0	10
1961-05-14	Eik Tonsberg	L 2-3	48.2	1290	1411	26.54%	24.50%	48.96%	-0.56	-3.4	5
1961-05-14	@ Rapid Moss	W 3-2	48.2	1411	1290	48.96%	24.50%	26.54%	+0.56	+3.4	14
1961-05-14	Greaker	L 1-2	54.6	1466	1357	55.99%	23.95%	20.06%	+0.65	-6.5	12
1961-05-14	@ Rosenborg	W 2-1	54.6	1357	1466	20.06%	23.95%	55.99%	-0.65	+6.5	12
1961-05-19	Lyn Oslo	D 2-2	61.8	1377	1510	25.25%	24.35%	50.40%	-0.62	+0.5	9
1961-05-19	@ Skeid	D 2-2	61.8	1510	1377	50.40%	24.35%	25.25%	+0.62	-0.5	15
1961-05-22	Sandefjord	W 2-1	43.2	1415	1334	52.83%	24.39%	22.79%	+0.51	+3.1	16
1961-05-22	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-2	43.2	1334	1415	22.79%	24.39%	52.83%	-0.51	-3.1	10
1961-05-28	IF Odd	W 4-1	38.8	1482	1360	57.31%	23.73%	18.96%	+0.72	+6.6	18
1961-05-28	@ Fredrikstad	L 1-4	38.8	1360	1482	18.96%	23.73%	57.31%	-0.72	-6.6	10
1961-05-28	Lisleby	L 0-2	43.3	1401	1401	42.53%	25.08%	32.39%	+0.08	-10.3	13
1961-05-28	@ Larvik Turn	W 2-0	43.3	1401	1401	32.39%	25.08%	42.53%	-0.08	+10.3	11
1961-05-28	Stavanger	D 1-1	54.2	1346	1425	31.79%	24.93%	43.28%	-0.33	+0.3	11
1961-05-28	@ Strommen	D 1-1	54.2	1425	1346	43.28%	24.93%	31.79%	+0.33	-0.3	8
1961-05-28	Valerenga	D 1-1	54.0	1398	1365	46.99%	24.90%	28.11%	+0.25	-0.5	13
1961-05-28	@ Viking	D 1-1	54.0	1365	1398	28.11%	24.90%	46.99%	-0.25	+0.5	12
1961-05-28	Lillestrom	W 4-1	40.7	1418	1381	47.48%	24.87%	27.65%	+0.27	+9.0	18
1961-05-28	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-4	40.7	1381	1418	27.65%	24.87%	47.48%	-0.27	-9.0	11
1961-05-28	Skeid	W 2-0	39.6	1364	1377	40.75%	25.11%	34.14%	+0.01	+8.7	14
1961-05-28	@ Greaker	L 0-2	39.6	1377	1364	34.14%	25.11%	40.75%	-0.01	-8.7	9
1961-05-28	Rosenborg	L 1-2	57.4	1509	1460	49.07%	24.76%	26.17%	+0.34	-5.8	15
1961-05-28	@ Lyn Oslo	W 2-1	57.4	1460	1509	26.17%	24.76%	49.07%	-0.34	+5.8	14
1961-05-28	Rapid Moss	W 3-0	33.3	1331	1287	48.41%	24.81%	26.78%	+0.31	+10.5	12
1961-05-28	@ Sandefjord	L 0-3	33.3	1287	1331	26.78%	24.81%	48.41%	-0.31	-10.5	5
1961-06-04	Valerenga	W 2-1	44.2	1488	1365	57.48%	23.70%	18.81%	+0.73	+2.7	20
1961-06-04	@ Fredrikstad	L 1-2	44.2	1365	1488	18.81%	23.70%	57.48%	-0.73	-2.7	12
1961-06-04	Viking	D 2-2	58.2	1354	1397	36.53%	25.10%	38.37%	-0.15	+0.0	11
1961-06-04	@ IF Odd	D 2-2	58.2	1397	1354	38.37%	25.10%	36.53%	+0.15	-0.0	14
1961-06-04	Larvik Turn	D 2-2	59.6	1424	1390	47.10%	24.89%	28.01%	+0.26	-0.4	9
1961-06-04	@ Stavanger	D 2-2	59.6	1390	1424	28.01%	24.89%	47.10%	-0.26	+0.4	14
1961-06-04	Lisleby	L 2-3	51.3	1347	1412	33.53%	25.01%	41.46%	-0.26	-4.1	11
1961-06-04	@ Strommen	W 3-2	51.3	1412	1347	41.46%	25.01%	33.53%	+0.26	+4.1	13
1961-06-04	Greaker	W 4-0	33.8	1503	1372	58.28%	23.56%	18.16%	+0.77	+9.8	17
1961-06-04	@ Lyn Oslo	L 0-4	33.8	1372	1503	18.16%	23.56%	58.28%	-0.77	-9.8	14
1961-06-04	Lillestrom	W 2-1	48.9	1276	1372	29.57%	24.78%	45.65%	-0.42	+5.5	7
1961-06-04	@ Rapid Moss	L 1-2	48.9	1372	1276	45.65%	24.78%	29.57%	+0.42	-5.5	11
1961-06-04	Rosenborg	D 1-1	55.7	1369	1466	29.43%	24.77%	45.79%	-0.43	+0.4	10
1961-06-04	@ Skeid	D 1-1	55.7	1466	1369	45.79%	24.77%	29.43%	+0.43	-0.4	15
1961-06-11	Stavanger	L 1-2	51.0	1416	1424	41.51%	25.10%	33.39%	+0.04	-5.0	13
1961-06-11	@ Lisleby	W 2-1	51.0	1424	1416	33.39%	25.10%	41.51%	-0.04	+5.1	11
1961-06-11	Strommen	W 2-0	37.9	1354	1343	44.13%	25.04%	30.84%	+0.14	+8.0	13
1961-06-11	@ IF Odd	L 0-2	37.9	1343	1354	30.84%	25.04%	44.13%	-0.14	-8.1	11
1961-06-11	Larvik Turn	W 8-1	40.3	1362	1391	38.66%	25.12%	36.22%	-0.07	+24.1	14
1961-06-11	@ Valerenga	L 1-8	40.3	1391	1362	36.22%	25.12%	38.66%	+0.07	-24.1	14
1961-06-11	Fredrikstad	L 3-6	49.4	1397	1491	29.81%	24.80%	45.38%	-0.41	-7.7	14
1961-06-11	@ Viking	W 6-3	49.4	1491	1397	45.38%	24.80%	29.81%	+0.41	+7.7	22
1961-06-11	Eik Tonsberg	W 1-0	45.8	1363	1427	33.67%	25.02%	41.31%	-0.25	+5.3	16
1961-06-11	@ Greaker	L 0-1	45.8	1427	1363	41.31%	25.02%	33.67%	+0.25	-5.3	18
1961-06-11	Skeid	L 0-3	39.4	1366	1369	42.26%	25.09%	32.66%	+0.07	-14.9	11
1961-06-11	@ Lillestrom	W 3-0	39.4	1369	1366	32.66%	25.09%	42.26%	-0.07	+14.9	12
1961-06-11	Rapid Moss	D 2-2	59.0	1465	1282	63.33%	22.41%	14.26%	+1.05	-1.1	16
1961-06-11	@ Rosenborg	D 2-2	59.0	1282	1465	14.26%	22.41%	63.33%	-1.05	+1.1	8
1961-06-11	Lyn Oslo	W 3-0	45.4	1341	1513	21.26%	23.71%	55.03%	-0.82	+18.6	14
1961-06-11	@ Sandefjord	L 0-3	45.4	1513	1341	55.03%	23.71%	21.26%	+0.82	-18.6	17

Playoff Game Log

Every playoff game for the team selected at the top of the tab (empty if they didn't reach the postseason). Sort any column by clicking its header. @ before an opponent name indicates an away game; the record column shows the team's running playoff record.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Record
1961-06-14	Lyn Oslo	W 6-4	59.5	1387	1495	28.09%	24.66%	47.25%	-0.49	+7.9	1-0
1961-06-14	@ Valerenga	L 4-6	59.5	1495	1387	47.25%	24.66%	28.09%	+0.49	-7.9	0-1
1961-06-16	Eik Tonsberg	W 2-0	40.6	1499	1421	52.40%	24.44%	23.16%	+0.49	+6.4	1-0
1961-06-16	@ Fredrikstad	L 0-2	40.6	1421	1499	23.16%	24.44%	52.40%	-0.49	-6.4	0-1

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	1960-10-09	18.28%	Strommen	1319	2	@ Stavanger	1449	0
2	1960-07-31	19.73%	Valerenga	1359	2	@ Stavanger	1471	1
3	1961-05-14	20.06%	Greaker	1357	2	@ Rosenborg	1466	1
4	1961-04-30	20.35%	Eik Tonsberg	1405	3	@ Lyn Oslo	1511	1
5	1961-04-30	20.80%	IF Odd	1347	4	@ Stavanger	1448	2
6	1961-06-11	21.26%	@ Sandefjord	1341	3	Lyn Oslo	1513	0
7	1960-10-16	23.06%	Larvik Turn	1396	2	@ Fredrikstad	1474	1
8	1960-08-17	24.05%	Viking	1396	1	@ Stavanger	1464	0
9	1961-05-28	26.17%	Rosenborg	1460	2	@ Lyn Oslo	1509	1
10	1960-08-17	26.52%	Sandefjord	1340	3	@ Skeid	1386	0
11	1961-05-07	26.54%	Strommen	1330	1	@ Valerenga	1376	0
12	1960-08-07	27.46%	@ Eik Tonsberg	1380	5	Lyn Oslo	1493	2
13	1960-10-16	27.88%	@ Sandefjord	1346	5	Rosenborg	1456	2
14	1961-06-14 *	28.09%	@ Valerenga	1387	6	Lyn Oslo	1495	4
15	1960-09-11	28.11%	@ Valerenga	1366	4	Fredrikstad	1474	2
16	1960-10-09	29.38%	Larvik Turn	1387	3	@ Lisleby	1409	1
17	1961-06-04	29.57%	@ Rapid Moss	1276	2	Lillestrom	1372	1
18	1961-04-30	29.65%	Sandefjord	1358	3	@ Greaker	1378	0
19	1960-10-02	30.09%	Valerenga	1375	2	@ Larvik Turn	1392	1
20	1961-05-14	30.33%	IF Odd	1355	2	@ Valerenga	1370	1
21	1961-05-07	30.51%	Skeid	1360	4	@ Sandefjord	1374	0
22	1960-10-02	31.26%	Lillestrom	1358	2	@ Skeid	1366	1
23	1960-08-21	31.42%	Greaker	1382	1	@ Eik Tonsberg	1389	0
24	1961-05-07	31.86%	@ Rapid Moss	1285	2	Greaker	1362	1
25	1961-05-28	32.39%	Lisleby	1401	2	@ Larvik Turn	1401	0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1961-06-11	24.11	@ Valerenga	8	1362	38.66%	Larvik Turn	1	1391	36.22%	25.12%
2	1961-05-07	20.29	Skeid	4	1360	30.51%	@ Sandefjord	0	1374	44.47%	25.02%
3	1961-06-11	18.59	@ Sandefjord	3	1341	21.26%	Lyn Oslo	0	1513	55.03%	23.71%
4	1960-07-31	18.15	Viking	4	1378	36.26%	@ Strommen	0	1349	38.62%	25.12%
5	1960-10-02	17.04	@ Eik Tonsberg	8	1388	52.11%	Rapid Moss	1	1314	23.42%	24.47%
6	1960-08-17	16.76	Sandefjord	3	1340	26.52%	@ Skeid	0	1386	48.70%	24.78%
7	1960-09-11	16.21	Lyn Oslo	5	1480	32.71%	@ Rosenborg	1	1477	42.20%	25.09%
8	1961-04-30	15.79	Sandefjord	3	1358	29.65%	@ Greaker	0	1378	45.36%	24.99%
9	1961-05-14	14.99	@ Lillestrom	4	1366	44.92%	Sandefjord	0	1349	30.08%	25.00%
10	1961-06-11	14.91	Skeid	3	1369	32.66%	@ Lillestrom	0	1366	42.26%	25.09%
11	1961-05-07	14.10	@ Viking	3	1388	35.53%	Stavanger	0	1438	39.39%	25.08%
12	1960-10-09	13.50	Strommen	2	1319	18.28%	@ Stavanger	0	1449	58.13%	23.58%
13	1960-10-16	13.40	Stavanger	3	1435	38.09%	@ Valerenga	0	1394	36.80%	25.10%
14	1960-10-09	13.21	@ Valerenga	3	1380	38.75%	Viking	0	1408	36.13%	25.12%
15	1960-08-21	13.08	@ Fredrikstad	5	1461	43.03%	Stavanger	1	1458	31.89%	25.07%
16	1960-10-16	12.82	@ Lillestrom	3	1373	40.17%	Greaker	0	1391	34.71%	25.12%
17	1960-08-17	12.16	Fredrikstad	4	1449	34.36%	@ Lisleby	1	1434	40.53%	25.12%
18	1960-08-07	12.05	@ Eik Tonsberg	5	1380	27.46%	Lyn Oslo	2	1493	47.94%	24.60%
19	1960-10-16	11.95	@ Sandefjord	5	1346	27.88%	Rosenborg	2	1456	47.48%	24.64%
20	1961-04-30	11.24	Eik Tonsberg	3	1405	20.35%	@ Lyn Oslo	1	1511	55.64%	24.01%
21	1960-10-09	10.51	@ Lillestrom	5	1363	51.11%	Rapid Moss	1	1297	24.31%	24.57%
22	1961-05-28	10.46	@ Sandefjord	3	1331	48.41%	Rapid Moss	0	1287	26.78%	24.81%
23	1961-05-28	10.32	Lisleby	2	1401	32.39%	@ Larvik Turn	0	1401	42.53%	25.08%
24	1961-05-07	10.27	Lyn Oslo	3	1499	49.20%	@ Lillestrom	0	1376	26.32%	24.48%
25	1961-04-30	9.97	IF Odd	4	1347	20.80%	@ Stavanger	2	1448	55.12%	24.08%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1960-07-31	66.9	@ Rosenborg	4	1471	58.87%	Sandefjord	4	1335	17.69%	23.44%
2	1960-08-21	66.1	@ Sandefjord	5	1357	41.85%	Lillestrom	5	1362	33.05%	25.10%
3	1960-08-18	64.9	@ Lyn Oslo	3	1481	57.10%	Lillestrom	3	1362	19.13%	23.77%
4	1961-05-19	61.8	@ Skeid	2	1377	25.25%	Lyn Oslo	2	1510	50.40%	24.35%
5	1960-08-21	60.8	@ Lyn Oslo	2	1480	56.18%	Skeid	2	1370	19.90%	23.92%
6	1960-08-07	60.1	@ Lillestrom	2	1361	27.90%	Rosenborg	2	1471	47.45%	24.64%
7	1960-07-31	59.9	@ Larvik Turn	2	1388	35.18%	Fredrikstad	2	1441	39.75%	25.07%
8	1961-06-04	59.6	@ Stavanger	2	1424	47.10%	Larvik Turn	2	1390	28.01%	24.89%
9	1961-06-14 *	59.5	@ Valerenga	6	1387	28.09%	Lyn Oslo	4	1495	47.25%	24.66%
10	1960-07-31	59.2	@ Lisleby	2	1430	51.49%	IF Odd	2	1361	23.98%	24.54%
11	1961-06-11	59.0	@ Rosenborg	2	1465	63.33%	Rapid Moss	2	1282	14.26%	22.41%
12	1960-10-16	58.6	@ Eik Tonsberg	2	1405	48.53%	Skeid	2	1360	26.68%	24.80%
13	1961-06-04	58.2	@ IF Odd	2	1354	36.53%	Viking	2	1397	38.37%	25.10%
14	1960-08-21	57.6	@ Strommen	2	1318	32.34%	Larvik Turn	2	1392	42.70%	24.96%
15	1961-05-28	57.4	Rosenborg	2	1460	26.17%	@ Lyn Oslo	1	1509	49.07%	24.76%
16	1960-10-02	56.0	@ Greaker	3	1393	33.20%	Rosenborg	2	1460	41.81%	25.00%
17	1960-08-07	55.9	@ Sandefjord	4	1336	35.90%	Greaker	3	1383	39.02%	25.09%
18	1961-06-04	55.7	@ Skeid	1	1369	29.43%	Rosenborg	1	1466	45.79%	24.77%
19	1960-08-07	55.5	@ IF Odd	1	1361	28.61%	Stavanger	1	1465	46.69%	24.71%
20	1961-04-30	55.3	IF Odd	4	1347	20.80%	@ Stavanger	2	1448	55.12%	24.08%
21	1960-10-16	55.0	Larvik Turn	2	1396	23.06%	@ Fredrikstad	1	1474	52.52%	24.42%
22	1960-07-31	54.9	Valerenga	2	1359	19.73%	@ Stavanger	1	1471	56.37%	23.89%
23	1961-05-14	54.6	@ Stavanger	0	1424	34.58%	Fredrikstad	0	1482	40.37%	25.05%
24	1961-05-14	54.6	Greaker	2	1357	20.06%	@ Rosenborg	1	1466	55.99%	23.95%
25	1961-04-30	54.5	Eik Tonsberg	3	1405	20.35%	@ Lyn Oslo	1	1511	55.64%	24.01%

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1960-08-07	33.0	@ Fredrikstad	3	1441	56.06%	Strommen	0	1331	20.00%	23.94%
2	1961-05-28	33.3	@ Sandefjord	3	1331	48.41%	Rapid Moss	0	1287	26.78%	24.81%
3	1961-06-04	33.8	@ Lyn Oslo	4	1503	58.28%	Greaker	0	1372	18.16%	23.56%
4	1961-05-14	34.2	@ Lillestrom	4	1366	44.92%	Sandefjord	0	1349	30.08%	25.00%
5	1960-10-02	35.5	@ Eik Tonsberg	8	1388	52.11%	Rapid Moss	1	1314	23.42%	24.47%
6	1960-10-09	36.0	@ Lillestrom	5	1363	51.11%	Rapid Moss	1	1297	24.31%	24.57%
7	1961-04-30	36.1	@ Rosenborg	3	1444	50.06%	Lillestrom	0	1386	25.27%	24.67%
8	1960-07-31	36.4	@ Lyn Oslo	8	1484	60.40%	Rapid Moss	2	1332	16.47%	23.12%
9	1960-07-31	37.0	Viking	4	1378	36.26%	@ Strommen	0	1349	38.62%	25.12%
10	1960-09-11	37.4	@ Viking	2	1410	49.41%	IF Odd	0	1358	25.86%	24.73%
11	1960-10-16	37.7	@ Lillestrom	3	1373	40.17%	Greaker	0	1391	34.71%	25.12%
12	1961-05-07	37.7	Lyn Oslo	3	1499	49.20%	@ Lillestrom	0	1376	26.32%	24.48%
13	1961-06-11	37.9	@ IF Odd	2	1354	44.13%	Strommen	0	1343	30.84%	25.04%
14	1960-10-02	38.3	@ Lyn Oslo	4	1496	59.61%	Sandefjord	1	1352	17.09%	23.29%
15	1960-10-09	38.6	@ Valerenga	3	1380	38.75%	Viking	0	1408	36.13%	25.12%
16	1961-05-07	38.8	Skeid	4	1360	30.51%	@ Sandefjord	0	1374	44.47%	25.02%
17	1961-05-28	38.8	@ Fredrikstad	4	1482	57.31%	IF Odd	1	1360	18.96%	23.73%
18	1961-06-11	39.4	Skeid	3	1369	32.66%	@ Lillestrom	0	1366	42.26%	25.09%
19	1961-05-28	39.6	@ Greaker	2	1364	40.75%	Skeid	0	1377	34.14%	25.11%
20	1960-08-21	39.7	Rosenborg	1	1473	53.80%	@ Rapid Moss	0	1312	22.30%	23.90%
21	1960-10-16	39.7	Stavanger	3	1435	38.09%	@ Valerenga	0	1394	36.80%	25.10%
22	1961-04-30	40.3	Sandefjord	3	1358	29.65%	@ Greaker	0	1378	45.36%	24.99%
23	1961-06-11	40.3	@ Valerenga	8	1362	38.66%	Larvik Turn	1	1391	36.22%	25.12%
24	1961-05-07	40.4	@ Viking	3	1388	35.53%	Stavanger	0	1438	39.39%	25.08%
25	1961-06-16 *	40.6	@ Fredrikstad	2	1499	52.40%	Eik Tonsberg	0	1421	23.16%	24.44%