1959-60 Main League Season

112 games · 4 promotion-playoff teams

Final

Champion

Fredrikstad

23 points · 8th Title

Last Title: 1956-57

Relegated

Start

5 pts

Brage · 6 pts

Raufoss · 8 pts

Brann · 11 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Fredrikstad

6.11 points above expected

23 points · 16.89 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Start

7.42 points below expected

5 points · 12.42 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Lillestrom	14	8	3	3	19	28	21	+7	13.72	+5.28
2	Valerenga	14	8	2	4	18	27	21	+6	16.22	+1.78
3	Viking	14	6	4	4	16	25	18	+7	15.57	+0.43
4	Larvik Turn	14	7	1	6	15	32	22	+10	16.40	-1.40
5	Greaker	14	5	4	5	14	25	20	+5	12.44	+1.56
6	Sandefjord	14	5	4	5	14	16	18	-2	13.75	+0.25
7	Brann Relegated	14	4	3	7	11	19	29	-10	11.48	-0.48
8	Start Relegated	14	1	3	10	5	15	38	-23	12.42	-7.42

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Fredrikstad Champion	14	10	3	1	23	41	16	+25	16.89	+6.11
2	Eik Tonsberg	14	8	1	5	17	30	21	+9	15.34	+1.66
3	Skeid	14	7	3	4	17	30	23	+7	15.02	+1.98
4	Rapid Moss	14	6	3	5	15	21	26	-5	11.78	+3.22
5	IF Odd	14	5	3	6	13	25	25	0	14.23	-1.23
6	Strommen	14	5	3	6	13	23	27	-4	14.30	-1.30
7	Raufoss Relegated	14	2	4	8	8	20	36	-16	11.70	-3.70
8	Brage Relegated	14	1	4	9	6	14	30	-16	12.74	-6.74

Notes

Fredrikstad defeated Lillestrom 6-2 in the championship final to win the league title.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Fredrikstad	23	16.89	+6.11
2	Lillestrom	19	13.72	+5.28
3	Rapid Moss	15	11.78	+3.22
4	Skeid	17	15.02	+1.98
5	Valerenga	18	16.22	+1.78

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Start	5	12.42	-7.42
2	Brage	6	12.74	-6.74
3	Raufoss	8	11.70	-3.70
4	Larvik Turn	15	16.40	-1.40
5	Strommen	13	14.30	-1.30

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Rapid Moss	3	Oct 4 – May 1	1 in 46
2	Fredrikstad	5	Jul 26 – Sep 6	1 in 39
3	Lillestrom	3	Sep 6 – Oct 11	1 in 32
4	Valerenga	4	Aug 16 – Sep 27	1 in 29
5	Eik Tonsberg	4	Oct 4 – May 8	1 in 15

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Eik Tonsberg	4	May 15 – Jun 12	1 in 122
2	Raufoss	6	Sep 6 – May 8	1 in 63
3	Brann	4	Aug 23 – Oct 11	1 in 51
4	Start	4	May 15 – Jun 12	1 in 16
5	Strommen	3	Oct 11 – May 1	1 in 14

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Raufoss	4	May 15 – Jun 12	1 in 33
2	Lillestrom	6	Sep 6 – May 8	1 in 20
3	Rapid Moss	4	Sep 27 – May 1	1 in 14
4	Greaker	4	Oct 11 – May 8	1 in 14
5	IF Odd	5	Aug 23 – Oct 25	1 in 10

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Brage	11	Aug 23 – Jun 12	1 in 90
2	Start	9	Sep 27 – Jun 12	1 in 25
3	Raufoss	9	Sep 6 – May 29	1 in 13
4	Eik Tonsberg	4	May 15 – Jun 12	1 in 13
5	Fredrikstad	3	Sep 27 – Oct 11	1 in 11

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team	Elo	Season Pts	Elo Δ (5)	Points (5)	Expected (5)	Actual − Exp
Fredrikstad	1293	23	+67	9	6.4	+2.6
Lillestrom	1182	19	+49	7	5.3	+1.7
Valerenga	1152	18	-28	5	5.9	-0.9
Skeid	1174	17	-18	6	6.0	-0.0
Eik Tonsberg	1161	17	-26	2	5.8	-3.8
Viking	1158	16	+5	7	6.0	+1.0
Rapid Moss	1104	15	+27	7	4.1	+2.9
Larvik Turn	1167	15	+0	6	6.2	-0.2
Greaker	1146	14	+86	7	4.6	+2.4
Sandefjord	1090	14	-14	4	4.4	-0.4
Strommen	1113	13	+17	7	5.0	+2.0
IF Odd	1121	13	-32	3	5.0	-2.0
Brann	1045	11	-43	3	3.8	-0.8
Raufoss	1028	8	+8	5	3.5	+1.5
Brage	1022	6	-43	1	4.3	-3.3
Start	991	5	-56	1	3.7	-2.7

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Group A

Team	BRA	GRE	LT	LIL	SAN	STA	VAL	VIK
Brann	—	1-0-1 2.93	1-0-1 1.82	0-0-2 2.52	0-1-1 2.66	2-0-0 2.59	0-0-2 2.34	0-2-0 1.66
Greaker	1-0-1 2.62	—	1-1-0 2.17	0-1-1 2.53	1-1-0 2.80	1-0-1 2.84	1-0-1 2.09	0-1-1 2.16
Larvik Turn	1-0-1 3.75	0-1-1 3.39	—	2-0-0 3.08	1-0-1 3.26	2-0-0 3.45	1-0-1 2.65	0-0-2 2.84
Lillestrom	2-0-0 3.04	1-1-0 3.02	0-0-2 2.47	—	2-0-0 2.76	0-2-0 3.02	1-0-1 2.39	2-0-0 2.39
Sandefjord	1-1-0 2.90	0-1-1 2.75	1-0-1 2.30	0-0-2 2.80	—	2-0-0 2.98	0-1-1 2.41	1-1-0 2.26
Start	0-0-2 2.97	1-0-1 2.72	0-0-2 2.12	0-2-0 2.53	0-0-2 2.58	—	0-1-1 1.87	0-0-2 2.53
Valerenga	2-0-0 3.22	1-0-1 3.47	1-0-1 2.90	1-0-1 3.17	1-1-0 3.14	1-1-0 3.69	—	1-0-1 2.82
Viking	0-2-0 3.90	1-1-0 3.39	2-0-0 2.71	0-0-2 3.16	0-1-1 3.29	2-0-0 3.02	1-0-1 2.74	—

Group B

Team	BRA	ET	FRE	IO	RM	RAU	SKE	STR
Brage	—	0-0-2 2.23	0-1-1 2.24	0-1-1 2.25	0-0-2 2.77	0-1-1 3.12	1-0-1 2.06	0-1-1 2.35
Eik Tonsberg	2-0-0 3.33	—	0-0-2 2.35	2-0-0 2.94	0-1-1 3.61	1-0-1 3.74	1-0-1 2.69	2-0-0 2.75
Fredrikstad	1-1-0 3.32	2-0-0 3.21	—	1-1-0 3.56	2-0-0 3.72	1-1-0 4.08	1-0-1 3.30	2-0-0 3.37
IF Odd	1-1-0 3.31	0-0-2 2.62	0-1-1 2.00	—	1-1-0 3.21	2-0-0 3.24	0-0-2 2.63	1-0-1 2.98
Rapid Moss	2-0-0 2.79	1-1-0 1.95	0-0-2 1.85	0-1-1 2.35	—	1-1-0 2.94	1-0-1 2.16	1-0-1 2.23
Raufoss	1-1-0 2.44	1-0-1 1.83	0-1-1 1.50	0-0-2 2.32	0-1-1 2.62	—	0-1-1 1.82	0-0-2 2.36
Skeid	1-0-1 3.50	1-0-1 2.86	1-0-1 2.26	2-0-0 2.92	1-0-1 3.40	1-1-0 3.74	—	0-2-0 3.21
Strommen	1-1-0 3.21	0-0-2 2.80	0-0-2 2.18	1-0-1 2.58	1-0-1 3.33	2-0-0 3.20	0-2-0 2.34	—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.73	+5.7
Allowed	0.75	-6.5
Differential	0.90	+3.7

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.57%	5.80%	1.79%	3.57%	3.12%	1.34%	19.20%
1	5.80%	12.50%	8.04%	2.68%	4.46%	2.68%	36.16%
2	1.79%	8.04%	3.57%	2.68%	0.89%	1.34%	18.30%
3	3.57%	2.68%	2.68%	0.89%	0.45%	0.45%	10.71%
4	3.12%	4.46%	0.89%	0.45%	0.89%	—	9.82%
5+	1.34%	2.68%	1.34%	0.45%	—	—	5.80%
Total	19.20%	36.16%	18.30%	10.71%	9.82%	5.80%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.75	1.75	+0.00
SD	1.48	1.48	2.31
CV	0.85	0.85	—
Max	7	7	+7
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 112

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	14.29%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	28.57%
1	7.14%	14.29%	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	—	50.00%
2	—	—	14.29%	—	—	—	14.29%
3	—	—	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.14%	28.57%	28.57%	14.29%	21.43%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.00	2.14	-1.14
SD	0.88	1.29	1.41
CV	0.88	0.60	—
Max	3	4	+1
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	14.29%	—	14.29%	—	7.14%	35.71%
1	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	—	—	—	28.57%
2	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
3	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%
4	—	14.29%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.14%	50.00%	14.29%	14.29%	—	14.29%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.36	2.07	-0.71
SD	1.45	1.90	2.58
CV	1.07	0.92	—
Max	4	7	+3
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
1	7.14%	—	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	—	35.71%
2	—	21.43%	7.14%	—	—	—	28.57%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	21.43%	—	—	—	—	21.43%
5+	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	7.14%	57.14%	21.43%	7.14%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.14	1.50	+0.64
SD	1.51	1.02	2.10
CV	0.71	0.68	—
Max	5	4	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
1	7.14%	21.43%	—	—	—	7.14%	35.71%
2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
3	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
4	21.43%	14.29%	—	—	—	—	35.71%
5+	—	—	14.29%	—	—	—	14.29%
Total	35.71%	35.71%	21.43%	—	—	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.93	1.14	+1.79
SD	1.59	1.35	2.26
CV	0.54	1.18	—
Max	5	5	+4
Min	1	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	21.43%
1	—	21.43%	—	14.29%	—	—	35.71%
2	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	—	14.29%
3	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
Total	21.43%	42.86%	14.29%	14.29%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.79	1.43	+0.36
SD	1.67	1.22	2.27
CV	0.94	0.86	—
Max	5	4	+5
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
1	7.14%	21.43%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	42.86%
2	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	28.57%
3	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	21.43%	42.86%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.79	1.79	+0.00
SD	1.25	1.76	2.35
CV	0.70	0.99	—
Max	5	5	+5
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
1	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	28.57%
2	7.14%	7.14%	—	14.29%	—	—	28.57%
3	14.29%	—	—	—	—	—	14.29%
4	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	14.29%
Total	28.57%	21.43%	21.43%	21.43%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.29	1.57	+0.71
SD	1.54	1.34	2.43
CV	0.67	0.85	—
Max	5	4	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	—	—	14.29%	—	—	21.43%
1	7.14%	14.29%	—	—	—	—	21.43%
2	7.14%	14.29%	—	—	—	7.14%	28.57%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	21.43%
5+	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%
Total	28.57%	35.71%	7.14%	21.43%	—	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.00	1.50	+0.50
SD	1.66	1.51	2.21
CV	0.83	1.00	—
Max	5	5	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%
1	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	35.71%
2	—	21.43%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	35.71%
3	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	14.29%	42.86%	14.29%	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.50	1.86	-0.36
SD	0.94	1.56	2.27
CV	0.63	0.84	—
Max	3	5	+3
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	21.43%
1	—	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	42.86%
2	—	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	21.43%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	—	14.29%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	—	35.71%	14.29%	21.43%	21.43%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.43	2.57	-1.14
SD	1.28	1.55	2.11
CV	0.90	0.60	—
Max	4	6	+3
Min	0	1	-5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	14.29%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	28.57%
1	14.29%	7.14%	14.29%	—	7.14%	—	42.86%
2	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	21.43%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	35.71%	21.43%	28.57%	7.14%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.14	1.29	-0.14
SD	1.10	1.27	1.75
CV	0.96	0.99	—
Max	4	4	+3
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	—	21.43%
1	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	28.57%
2	—	14.29%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
3	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
4	—	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	14.29%
5+	—	14.29%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
Total	14.29%	50.00%	14.29%	—	21.43%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.14	1.64	+0.50
SD	1.96	1.39	2.41
CV	0.91	0.85	—
Max	6	4	+5
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	28.57%
1	—	7.14%	14.29%	—	14.29%	14.29%	50.00%
2	—	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%
3	—	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.14%	21.43%	21.43%	14.29%	14.29%	21.43%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.07	2.71	-1.64
SD	1.00	1.68	1.95
CV	0.93	0.62	—
Max	3	5	+2
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	7.14%	—	7.14%	—	—	21.43%
1	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%	—	7.14%	—	35.71%
2	—	—	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	14.29%
3	—	—	14.29%	—	—	—	14.29%
4	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	—	—	14.29%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	21.43%	14.29%	35.71%	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.64	1.93	-0.29
SD	1.39	1.49	1.94
CV	0.85	0.77	—
Max	4	5	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	14.29%	—	14.29%
1	14.29%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	7.14%	35.71%
2	7.14%	14.29%	—	—	—	—	21.43%
3	14.29%	—	—	7.14%	—	—	21.43%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	42.86%	21.43%	7.14%	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.93	1.50	+0.43
SD	1.77	1.79	3.06
CV	0.92	1.19	—
Max	7	5	+7
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	14.29%	—	—	7.14%	—	28.57%
1	—	21.43%	7.14%	—	—	—	28.57%
2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
3	—	14.29%	14.29%	—	—	—	28.57%
4	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	14.29%	57.14%	21.43%	—	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.79	1.29	+0.50
SD	1.67	0.99	2.10
CV	0.94	0.77	—
Max	5	4	+4
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 14

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Fredrikstad	1306	23	16.89	+6.11	98.0%	10	11	15	17	19	22	25
Skeid	1174	17	15.02	+1.98	74.0%	5	10	13	15	18	20	23
Eik Tonsberg	1172	17	15.34	+1.66	73.0%	7	10	13	15	18	20	22
Lillestrom	1169	19	13.72	+5.28	96.0%	7	9	11	14	16	19	21
Larvik Turn	1167	15	16.40	-1.40	44.0%	8	11	14	16	19	21	25
Viking	1158	16	15.57	+0.43	60.0%	5	10	13	15	18	21	22
Greaker	1146	14	12.44	+1.56	82.0%	3	7	11	12	14	18	21
Valerenga	1141	18	16.22	+1.78	73.0%	8	10	14	16	19	21	22
IF Odd	1121	13	14.23	-1.23	47.0%	8	9	12	14	16	20	22
Strommen	1113	13	14.30	-1.30	42.0%	5	9	12	14	16	19	21
Rapid Moss	1104	15	11.78	+3.22	88.0%	4	6	9	12	14	17	21
Sandefjord	1090	14	13.75	+0.25	56.0%	2	9	11	14	16	19	19
Brann	1045	11	11.48	-0.48	53.0%	3	6	9	11	14	17	19
Raufoss	1028	8	11.70	-3.70	12.0%	3	8	10	11	14	17	20
Brage	1022	6	12.74	-6.74	2.0%	6	7	11	13	15	18	21
Start	991	5	12.42	-7.42	2.0%	5	6	10	12	14	18	21

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 14.5% * Slight Edge: 14.5% to 17.5% * Clear Edge: 17.5% to 23% * Strong Edge: 23% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+8.93%

No Edge

43.75%21.43%34.82%

Elo Value

Home Edge: 31.10 Elo pts.

121 Elo

0.008 goals per Elo point

0400

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.53 goals

Home-Tilted

-2+0.26+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 8th * Longshot: 9th or lower.
Title Margin: Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.09 * Tight Race: 0.09 to 0.21 * Comfortable: 0.21 to 0.29 * Runaway: 0.29 and up.

Title-Race Openness

8.7

Wide Open

134612

Champion Preseason Odds

37%

Fredrikstad, 1st of 16

LongshotFavorite

Title Margin

Expected

0.29/gm

Comfortable

00.120.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.54 * Some Luck: 2.54 to 3.82 * Lucky: 3.82 to 5.09 * Wild Swing: 5.09 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 2.94 * Close: 2.94 to 4.41 * Off: 4.41 to 5.89 * Way Off: 5.89 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 16 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 16 typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 16 * As Expected: 16 to 25.6 * Several Outliers: 25.6 to 35.2 * Many Outliers: 35.2 and up.
Unexpected Relegations: Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 2.09 * A Surprise: 2.09 to 3.34 * Several Surprises: 3.34 to 4.6 * Many Surprises: 4.6 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

3.60 points

Some Luck

03.188

Average Finish Error

Expected

2.88

Pinpoint

03.688

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 96.88%

98.00%

Fredrikstad

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 3.12%

2.00%

Brage

050

Season Outliers

Expected

4 of 16

Minimal Outliers

01.68

Unexpected Relegations

Expected

1 of 4

As Expected

02.14

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.14 * Even: 0.14 to 0.16 * Top-Heavy: 0.16 to 0.19 * Lopsided: 0.19 and up.
Noll-Scully: Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.55 * Strong Separation: 1.55 to 1.75 * Wide Separation: 1.75 and up.
Interquartile Edge: Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 61.5% * Slight Edge: 61.5% to 65% * Clear Edge: 65% to 69.5% * Wide Edge: 69.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst: Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82% * Clear Edge: 82% to 87.5% * Strong Edge: 87.5% to 92.5% * Dominant: 92.5% and up.
Close Games: Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 53.5% * Some Drama: 53.5% to 58% * Frequent: 58% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts: Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16% * Occasional: 16% to 19% * Frequent: 19% to 25% * Very Frequent: 25% and up.

Gini Index

0.18

Top-Heavy

00.140.5

Noll-Scully

Elo SD: 75.35

1.43

Moderate Separation

0.91.351.551.752.5

Interquartile Edge

62%

Slight Edge

50%61.5%69.5%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline

85%

Clear Edge

50%83%100%

Close Games

Expected

55%

Some Drama

0%48%100%

Blowouts

Expected

33%

Very Frequent

0%28%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.32 * Slight Separation: 0.32 to 0.34 * Notable Separation: 0.34 to 0.38 * Lopsided: 0.38 and up.
Strangeness: How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.28 * Some Carryover: 0.28 to 0.48 * Strong Carryover: 0.48 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23.5% * As Expected: 23.5% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 27.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 27.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19% * As Expected: 19% to 22% * Shaky Favorites: 22% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.63

Hard to Predict

00.622

Matchup Imbalance

0.26

Very Even

00.320.380.5

Strangeness

Expected

1.28

Wilder Than Modeled

01.002

Repeatability

0.44

Some Carryover

00.280.481

Upset Rate

Expected

31%

Very Upset-Prone

0%29%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

25%

Very Shaky

0%24%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.15 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.15 to 0.23 * Above Noise: 0.23 to 0.3 * Well Above Noise: 0.3 and up.

Probability calibration

0.14

Well Calibrated

0.010.050.10.51

Calibration slope

Ideal

1.15

Underconfident

0.51.001.5

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.059

Well Within Noise

00.1500.4

Promotion Playoff

The path the promotion-playoff teams took to determine the final promotion spot. The sections below show matchup heatmaps and round-by-round simulation outcomes.

Finals

Fredrikstad 6

Lillestrom 2

Sim: 2.0%

Eik Tonsberg 4

Valerenga 2

Sim: 2.0%

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Lillestrom	5.00%	14.00%	15.00%	11.00%	17.00%	16.00%	14.00%	8.00%
Valerenga	31.00%	17.00%	15.00%	13.00%	11.00%	5.00%	7.00%	1.00%
Viking	20.00%	21.00%	17.00%	11.00%	17.00%	4.00%	7.00%	3.00%
Larvik Turn	32.00%	15.00%	18.00%	17.00%	7.00%	4.00%	4.00%	3.00%
Greaker	3.00%	4.00%	11.00%	11.00%	19.00%	19.00%	13.00%	20.00%
Sandefjord	3.00%	22.00%	12.00%	13.00%	9.00%	16.00%	15.00%	10.00%
Brann	3.00%	1.00%	6.00%	11.00%	10.00%	18.00%	19.00%	32.00%
Start	3.00%	6.00%	6.00%	13.00%	10.00%	18.00%	21.00%	23.00%

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Fredrikstad	37.00%	22.00%	17.00%	5.00%	8.00%	6.00%	4.00%	1.00%
Eik Tonsberg	14.00%	24.00%	20.00%	12.00%	10.00%	10.00%	8.00%	2.00%
Skeid	16.00%	21.00%	11.00%	18.00%	7.00%	13.00%	10.00%	4.00%
Rapid Moss	2.00%	3.00%	10.00%	12.00%	11.00%	20.00%	17.00%	25.00%
IF Odd	11.00%	13.00%	7.00%	10.00%	32.00%	10.00%	11.00%	6.00%
Strommen	14.00%	7.00%	20.00%	16.00%	13.00%	12.00%	13.00%	5.00%
Raufoss	3.00%	2.00%	7.00%	12.00%	8.00%	14.00%	23.00%	31.00%
Brage	3.00%	8.00%	8.00%	15.00%	11.00%	15.00%	14.00%	26.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Stochastic Promotion/Relegation Outcomes

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations from preseason Elo, the probability of each team's next-season outcome — promotion-positive outcomes on the left, relegation-positive on the right. The round buttons switch to heatmaps of how often each pair of teams met in that round of the playoff across the simulations, since every iteration produces a different field.

Team	Same level	Direct relegation
Fredrikstad	—	—
Lillestrom	—	—
Larvik Turn	61.00%	7.00%
Valerenga	61.00%	8.00%
Eik Tonsberg	76.00%	10.00%
Viking	70.00%	10.00%
Skeid	70.00%	14.00%
IF Odd	72.00%	17.00%
Strommen	68.00%	18.00%
Sandefjord	72.00%	25.00%
Greaker	64.00%	33.00%
Brage	57.00%	40.00%
Rapid Moss	56.00%	42.00%
Start	53.00%	44.00%
Brann	46.00%	51.00%
Raufoss	43.00%	54.00%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Brage	Brann	Eik Tonsberg	Fredrikstad	Greaker	IF Odd	Larvik Turn	Lillestrom	Rapid Moss	Raufoss	Sandefjord	Skeid	Start	Strommen	Valerenga	Viking
Brage							0.0%1.00%									0.0%2.00%
Brann			0.0%1.00%	0.0%1.00%		0.0%1.00%						100.0%1.00%
Eik Tonsberg		100.0%1.00%					80.0%5.00%	100.0%1.00%					100.0%1.00%		66.7%3.00%	50.0%4.00%
Fredrikstad		100.0%1.00%			75.0%4.00%		75.0%12.00%	50.0%4.00%			50.0%2.00%		100.0%1.00%		50.0%12.00%	68.8%16.00%
Greaker				25.0%4.00%
IF Odd		100.0%1.00%					66.7%3.00%	0.0%1.00%								50.0%2.00%
Larvik Turn	100.0%1.00%		20.0%5.00%	25.0%12.00%		33.3%3.00%				66.7%3.00%		50.0%2.00%
Lillestrom			0.0%1.00%	50.0%4.00%		100.0%1.00%						100.0%1.00%
Rapid Moss																100.0%1.00%
Raufoss							33.3%3.00%				0.0%1.00%					100.0%1.00%
Sandefjord				50.0%2.00%						100.0%1.00%		50.0%2.00%		100.0%1.00%
Skeid		0.0%1.00%					50.0%2.00%	0.0%1.00%			50.0%2.00%				50.0%4.00%
Start			0.0%1.00%	0.0%1.00%										0.0%1.00%
Strommen											0.0%1.00%		100.0%1.00%		0.0%2.00%	33.3%3.00%
Valerenga			33.3%3.00%	50.0%12.00%								50.0%4.00%		100.0%2.00%
Viking	100.0%2.00%		50.0%4.00%	31.2%16.00%		50.0%2.00%			0.0%1.00%	0.0%1.00%				66.7%3.00%

Actual Promotion/Relegation Outcomes

Just the teams that actually reached the promotion playoff. With the field fixed in place, the playoff sim re-runs every tie and tallies how often each team won each round — the table gives those probabilities, and the final round's column is the chance of winning the playoff outright. The round buttons switch to heatmaps of how often each pairing met in that round.

Team	Finals
Fredrikstad	67.00%
Lillestrom	33.00%

Loser → ↓ Winner	Fredrikstad	Lillestrom
Fredrikstad		67.0%100.00%
Lillestrom	33.0%100.00%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
1959-07-26	Larvik Turn	W 3-2	50.6	1088	1135	40.07%	22.32%	37.61%	-0.13	+8.2	2
1959-07-26	@ Greaker	L 2-3	50.6	1135	1088	37.61%	22.32%	40.07%	+0.13	-8.2	0
1959-07-26	Brann	D 2-2	57.7	1097	1088	47.60%	22.27%	30.13%	+0.33	-0.6	1
1959-07-26	@ Sandefjord	D 2-2	57.7	1088	1097	30.13%	22.27%	47.60%	-0.33	+0.7	1
1959-07-26	Viking	L 2-3	53.2	1135	1138	45.95%	22.30%	31.75%	+0.23	-9.6	0
1959-07-26	@ Start	W 3-2	53.2	1138	1135	31.75%	22.30%	45.95%	-0.23	+9.6	2
1959-07-26	Lillestrom	W 3-0	32.7	1141	1110	50.38%	22.21%	27.41%	+0.51	+19.4	2
1959-07-26	@ Valerenga	L 0-3	32.7	1110	1141	27.41%	22.21%	50.38%	-0.51	-19.4	0
1959-07-26	Fredrikstad	L 0-4	36.6	1135	1159	43.20%	22.32%	34.48%	+0.06	-36.4	0
1959-07-26	@ Brage	W 4-0	36.6	1159	1135	34.48%	22.32%	43.20%	-0.06	+36.4	2
1959-07-26	Raufoss	W 3-0	33.7	1114	1108	47.20%	22.28%	30.52%	+0.30	+21.2	2
1959-07-26	@ IF Odd	L 0-3	33.7	1108	1114	30.52%	22.28%	47.20%	-0.30	-21.2	0
1959-07-26	Skeid	L 1-2	46.5	1105	1144	41.16%	22.32%	36.51%	-0.06	-9.2	0
1959-07-26	@ Rapid Moss	W 2-1	46.5	1144	1105	36.51%	22.32%	41.16%	+0.06	+9.2	2
1959-07-26	Eik Tonsberg	L 1-2	48.9	1137	1116	49.25%	22.24%	28.51%	+0.44	-10.7	0
1959-07-26	@ Strommen	W 2-1	48.9	1116	1137	28.51%	22.24%	49.25%	-0.44	+10.7	2
1959-08-02	Start	W 2-1	45.0	1089	1125	41.52%	22.32%	36.16%	-0.04	+8.3	3
1959-08-02	@ Brann	L 1-2	45.0	1125	1089	36.16%	22.32%	41.52%	+0.04	-8.3	0
1959-08-02	Valerenga	W 4-0	34.3	1127	1160	41.90%	22.32%	35.78%	-0.02	+31.4	2
1959-08-02	@ Larvik Turn	L 0-4	34.3	1160	1127	35.78%	22.32%	41.90%	+0.02	-31.4	2
1959-08-02	Greaker	W 4-2	46.0	1090	1097	45.63%	22.30%	32.07%	+0.21	+11.7	2
1959-08-02	@ Lillestrom	L 2-4	46.0	1097	1090	32.07%	22.30%	45.63%	-0.21	-11.7	2
1959-08-02	Sandefjord	D 0-0	49.0	1148	1096	52.82%	22.13%	25.05%	+0.68	-1.6	3
1959-08-02	@ Viking	D 0-0	49.0	1096	1148	25.05%	22.13%	52.82%	-0.68	+1.6	2
1959-08-02	Brage	W 2-1	42.5	1126	1098	50.03%	22.22%	27.76%	+0.49	+6.7	4
1959-08-02	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-2	42.5	1098	1126	27.76%	22.22%	50.03%	-0.49	-6.7	0
1959-08-02	Strommen	W 5-2	40.2	1195	1127	54.74%	22.05%	23.21%	+0.82	+12.3	4
1959-08-02	@ Fredrikstad	L 2-5	40.2	1127	1195	23.21%	22.05%	54.74%	-0.82	-12.3	0
1959-08-02	Rapid Moss	D 1-1	52.5	1087	1096	45.32%	22.30%	32.38%	+0.19	-0.6	1
1959-08-02	@ Raufoss	D 1-1	52.5	1096	1087	32.38%	22.30%	45.32%	-0.19	+0.6	1
1959-08-02	IF Odd	W 4-2	45.2	1153	1135	48.69%	22.25%	29.05%	+0.40	+10.8	4
1959-08-02	@ Skeid	L 2-4	45.2	1135	1153	29.05%	22.25%	48.69%	-0.40	-10.8	2
1959-08-16	Brann	L 0-1	43.1	1085	1097	44.81%	22.31%	32.89%	+0.16	-10.5	2
1959-08-16	@ Greaker	W 1-0	43.1	1097	1085	32.89%	22.31%	44.81%	-0.16	+10.5	5
1959-08-16	Larvik Turn	W 2-0	38.6	1098	1158	38.12%	22.31%	39.57%	-0.24	+17.9	4
1959-08-16	@ Sandefjord	L 0-2	38.6	1158	1098	39.57%	22.31%	38.12%	+0.24	-17.9	2
1959-08-16	Lillestrom	D 0-0	49.0	1117	1102	48.31%	22.26%	29.43%	+0.38	-1.1	1
1959-08-16	@ Start	D 0-0	49.0	1102	1117	29.43%	22.26%	48.31%	-0.38	+1.1	3
1959-08-16	Viking	W 2-1	44.3	1129	1146	44.12%	22.32%	33.57%	+0.11	+7.9	4
1959-08-16	@ Valerenga	L 1-2	44.3	1146	1129	33.57%	22.32%	44.12%	-0.11	-7.9	3
1959-08-16	Skeid	W 1-0	42.0	1091	1164	36.40%	22.29%	41.30%	-0.34	+9.8	2
1959-08-16	@ Brage	L 0-1	42.0	1164	1091	41.30%	22.29%	36.40%	+0.34	-9.8	4
1959-08-16	Eik Tonsberg	L 0-1	43.2	1125	1133	45.32%	22.30%	32.38%	+0.19	-10.6	2
1959-08-16	@ IF Odd	W 1-0	43.2	1133	1125	32.38%	22.30%	45.32%	-0.19	+10.6	6
1959-08-16	Fredrikstad	L 1-4	39.1	1096	1207	31.20%	22.19%	46.61%	-0.66	-18.1	1
1959-08-16	@ Rapid Moss	W 4-1	39.1	1207	1096	46.61%	22.19%	31.20%	+0.66	+18.1	6
1959-08-16	Raufoss	W 4-0	31.9	1114	1087	49.98%	22.22%	27.80%	+0.49	+25.6	2
1959-08-16	@ Strommen	L 0-4	31.9	1087	1114	27.80%	22.22%	49.98%	-0.49	-25.6	1
1959-08-23	Valerenga	L 0-1	42.4	1108	1137	42.50%	22.32%	35.17%	+0.02	-10.0	5
1959-08-23	@ Brann	W 1-0	42.4	1137	1108	35.17%	22.32%	42.50%	-0.02	+10.0	6
1959-08-23	Larvik Turn	L 2-5	45.7	1103	1140	41.41%	22.32%	36.27%	-0.05	-19.7	3
1959-08-23	@ Lillestrom	W 5-2	45.7	1140	1103	36.27%	22.32%	41.41%	+0.05	+19.7	4
1959-08-23	Start	W 4-1	39.1	1116	1116	46.48%	22.29%	31.23%	+0.26	+18.2	6
1959-08-23	@ Sandefjord	L 1-4	39.1	1116	1116	31.23%	22.29%	46.48%	-0.26	-18.2	1
1959-08-23	Greaker	D 1-1	52.6	1138	1074	54.26%	22.07%	23.67%	+0.79	-1.6	4
1959-08-23	@ Viking	D 1-1	52.6	1074	1138	23.67%	22.07%	54.26%	-0.79	+1.6	3
1959-08-23	Eik Tonsberg	W 4-1	36.3	1226	1144	56.22%	21.97%	21.81%	+0.93	+13.5	8
1959-08-23	@ Fredrikstad	L 1-4	36.3	1144	1226	21.81%	21.97%	56.22%	-0.93	-13.5	6
1959-08-23	Rapid Moss	W 5-0	31.7	1114	1078	50.96%	22.19%	26.85%	+0.55	+30.7	4
1959-08-23	@ IF Odd	L 0-5	31.7	1078	1114	26.85%	22.19%	50.96%	-0.55	-30.7	1
1959-08-23	Brage	W 4-1	40.7	1061	1101	40.95%	22.32%	36.72%	-0.08	+20.7	3
1959-08-23	@ Raufoss	L 1-4	40.7	1101	1061	36.72%	22.32%	40.95%	+0.08	-20.7	2
1959-08-23	Strommen	D 1-1	52.6	1154	1140	48.24%	22.26%	29.50%	+0.37	-0.9	5
1959-08-23	@ Skeid	D 1-1	52.6	1140	1154	29.50%	22.26%	48.24%	-0.37	+1.0	3
1959-09-06	Lillestrom	L 1-2	48.6	1098	1084	48.25%	22.26%	29.49%	+0.37	-10.5	5
1959-09-06	@ Brann	W 2-1	48.6	1084	1098	29.49%	22.26%	48.25%	-0.37	+10.5	5
1959-09-06	Viking	L 1-3	46.7	1160	1137	49.40%	22.24%	28.36%	+0.45	-18.6	4
1959-09-06	@ Larvik Turn	W 3-1	46.7	1137	1160	28.36%	22.24%	49.40%	-0.45	+18.6	6
1959-09-06	Greaker	W 3-1	40.4	1097	1076	49.20%	22.24%	28.56%	+0.43	+11.9	3
1959-09-06	@ Start	L 1-3	40.4	1076	1097	28.56%	22.24%	49.20%	-0.43	-12.0	3
1959-09-06	Sandefjord	W 3-0	33.4	1147	1134	48.09%	22.26%	29.65%	+0.36	+20.7	8
1959-09-06	@ Valerenga	L 0-3	33.4	1134	1147	29.65%	22.26%	48.09%	-0.36	-20.7	6
1959-09-06	IF Odd	D 1-1	52.5	1081	1145	37.56%	22.31%	40.14%	-0.27	+0.1	3
1959-09-06	@ Brage	D 1-1	52.5	1145	1081	40.14%	22.31%	37.56%	+0.27	-0.1	5
1959-09-06	Skeid	W 4-1	40.0	1130	1153	43.37%	22.32%	34.31%	+0.07	+19.6	8
1959-09-06	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-4	40.0	1153	1130	34.31%	22.32%	43.37%	-0.07	-19.6	5
1959-09-06	Strommen	L 2-3	49.4	1048	1141	33.52%	22.24%	44.24%	-0.51	-7.4	1
1959-09-06	@ Rapid Moss	W 3-2	49.4	1141	1048	44.24%	22.24%	33.52%	+0.51	+7.4	5
1959-09-06	Fredrikstad	L 2-3	47.0	1082	1239	25.61%	21.96%	52.43%	-1.04	-6.0	3
1959-09-06	@ Raufoss	W 3-2	47.0	1239	1082	52.43%	21.96%	25.61%	+1.04	+6.0	10
1959-09-27	Valerenga	L 0-2	36.4	1064	1167	32.19%	22.21%	45.60%	-0.60	-15.2	3
1959-09-27	@ Greaker	W 2-0	36.4	1167	1064	45.60%	22.21%	32.19%	+0.60	+15.2	10
1959-09-27	Lillestrom	L 0-2	41.4	1113	1094	48.92%	22.25%	28.83%	+0.42	-21.3	6
1959-09-27	@ Sandefjord	W 2-0	41.4	1094	1113	28.83%	22.25%	48.92%	-0.42	+21.3	7
1959-09-27	Larvik Turn	L 0-2	39.4	1109	1141	42.12%	22.32%	35.56%	-0.01	-18.8	3
1959-09-27	@ Start	W 2-0	39.4	1141	1109	35.56%	22.32%	42.12%	+0.01	+18.8	6
1959-09-27	Fredrikstad	D 1-1	52.7	1145	1245	32.58%	22.22%	45.20%	-0.57	+0.6	6
1959-09-27	@ IF Odd	D 1-1	52.7	1245	1145	45.20%	22.22%	32.58%	+0.57	-0.6	11
1959-09-27	Eik Tonsberg	D 2-2	57.7	1040	1150	31.39%	22.19%	46.42%	-0.65	+0.6	2
1959-09-27	@ Rapid Moss	D 2-2	57.7	1150	1040	46.42%	22.19%	31.39%	+0.65	-0.6	9
1959-09-27	Raufoss	W 6-1	34.4	1133	1076	53.54%	22.10%	24.36%	+0.73	+23.4	7
1959-09-27	@ Skeid	L 1-6	34.4	1076	1133	24.36%	22.10%	53.54%	-0.73	-23.4	3
1959-09-27	Brage	D 2-2	57.8	1148	1081	54.67%	22.05%	23.28%	+0.82	-1.2	6
1959-09-27	@ Strommen	D 2-2	57.8	1081	1148	23.28%	22.05%	54.67%	-0.82	+1.2	4
1959-10-04	Brann	W 3-0	31.3	1160	1087	55.26%	22.02%	22.72%	+0.86	+16.6	8
1959-10-04	@ Larvik Turn	L 0-3	31.3	1087	1160	22.72%	22.02%	55.26%	-0.86	-16.6	5
1959-10-04	Start	D 3-3	62.4	1183	1091	57.28%	21.91%	20.80%	+1.02	-1.2	11
1959-10-04	@ Valerenga	D 3-3	62.4	1091	1183	20.80%	21.91%	57.28%	-1.02	+1.2	4
1959-10-04	Rapid Moss	L 0-1	45.0	1082	1041	51.62%	22.17%	26.21%	+0.60	-11.9	4
1959-10-04	@ Brage	W 1-0	45.0	1041	1082	26.21%	22.17%	51.62%	-0.60	+11.9	4
1959-10-04	Raufoss	W 4-1	35.7	1149	1052	57.78%	21.88%	20.34%	+1.06	+12.7	11
1959-10-04	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-4	35.7	1052	1149	20.34%	21.88%	57.78%	-1.06	-12.7	3
1959-10-04	Skeid	L 1-5	45.2	1244	1157	56.81%	21.94%	21.25%	+0.98	-38.7	11
1959-10-04	@ Fredrikstad	W 5-1	45.2	1157	1244	21.25%	21.94%	56.81%	-0.98	+38.7	9
1959-10-11	Sandefjord	L 0-1	42.7	1070	1092	43.54%	22.32%	34.14%	+0.08	-10.2	5
1959-10-11	@ Brann	W 1-0	42.7	1092	1070	34.14%	22.32%	43.54%	-0.08	+10.2	8
1959-10-11	Greaker	D 1-1	52.7	1177	1049	60.78%	21.66%	17.56%	+1.31	-2.3	9
1959-10-11	@ Larvik Turn	D 1-1	52.7	1049	1177	17.56%	21.66%	60.78%	-1.31	+2.3	4
1959-10-11	Valerenga	W 2-1	46.3	1115	1181	37.29%	22.30%	40.40%	-0.29	+9.1	9
1959-10-11	@ Lillestrom	L 1-2	46.3	1181	1115	40.40%	22.30%	37.29%	+0.29	-9.1	11
1959-10-11	Start	W 5-1	35.1	1155	1092	54.22%	22.07%	23.71%	+0.78	+18.7	8
1959-10-11	@ Viking	L 1-5	35.1	1092	1155	23.71%	22.07%	54.22%	-0.78	-18.7	4
1959-10-11	Strommen	W 4-1	38.6	1162	1147	48.34%	22.26%	29.40%	+0.38	+17.3	13
1959-10-11	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-4	38.6	1147	1162	29.40%	22.26%	48.34%	-0.38	-17.3	6
1959-10-11	Brage	D 1-1	52.8	1206	1070	61.49%	21.59%	16.92%	+1.38	-2.4	12
1959-10-11	@ Fredrikstad	D 1-1	52.8	1070	1206	16.92%	21.59%	61.49%	-1.38	+2.4	5
1959-10-11	IF Odd	L 1-2	43.7	1040	1145	31.91%	22.21%	45.88%	-0.61	-7.5	3
1959-10-11	@ Raufoss	W 2-1	43.7	1145	1040	45.88%	22.21%	31.91%	+0.61	+7.5	8
1959-10-11	Rapid Moss	L 1-2	52.6	1196	1053	62.14%	21.53%	16.33%	+1.44	-13.3	9
1959-10-11	@ Skeid	W 2-1	52.6	1053	1196	16.33%	21.53%	62.14%	-1.44	+13.4	6
1959-10-25	IF Odd	L 0-1	42.7	1130	1153	43.37%	22.32%	34.31%	+0.07	-10.2	6
1959-10-25	@ Strommen	W 1-0	42.7	1153	1130	34.31%	22.32%	43.37%	-0.07	+10.2	10
1960-04-24	Brann	D 1-1	52.7	1174	1060	59.47%	21.76%	18.77%	+1.20	-2.2	9
1960-04-24	@ Viking	D 1-1	52.7	1060	1174	18.77%	21.76%	59.47%	-1.20	+2.2	6
1960-04-26	Sandefjord	W 2-1	45.6	1051	1102	39.40%	22.32%	38.28%	-0.17	+8.7	6
1960-04-26	@ Greaker	L 1-2	45.6	1102	1051	38.28%	22.32%	39.40%	+0.17	-8.7	8
1960-04-30	Lillestrom	D 1-1	52.5	1060	1125	37.47%	22.31%	40.23%	-0.28	+0.1	7
1960-04-30	@ Greaker	D 1-1	52.5	1125	1060	40.23%	22.31%	37.47%	+0.28	-0.1	10
1960-04-30	Viking	W 1-0	42.3	1094	1172	35.56%	22.28%	42.16%	-0.39	+10.0	10
1960-04-30	@ Sandefjord	L 0-1	42.3	1172	1094	42.16%	22.28%	35.56%	+0.39	-10.0	9
1960-04-30	Larvik Turn	W 2-1	43.7	1172	1174	46.18%	22.29%	31.52%	+0.24	+7.5	13
1960-04-30	@ Valerenga	L 1-2	43.7	1174	1172	31.52%	22.29%	46.18%	-0.24	-7.5	9
1960-05-01	Brann	L 1-4	44.0	1073	1062	47.83%	22.27%	29.91%	+0.34	-25.6	4
1960-05-01	@ Start	W 4-1	44.0	1062	1073	29.91%	22.27%	47.83%	-0.34	+25.6	8
1960-05-01	Eik Tonsberg	L 1-2	43.7	1072	1179	31.76%	22.20%	46.03%	-0.62	-7.5	5
1960-05-01	@ Brage	W 2-1	43.7	1179	1072	46.03%	22.20%	31.76%	+0.62	+7.5	15
1960-05-01	Skeid	L 1-2	47.4	1163	1182	43.86%	22.32%	33.82%	+0.10	-9.7	10
1960-05-01	@ IF Odd	W 2-1	47.4	1182	1163	33.82%	22.32%	43.86%	-0.10	+9.7	11
1960-05-01	Raufoss	W 3-1	40.0	1066	1032	50.73%	22.20%	27.07%	+0.54	+11.4	8
1960-05-01	@ Rapid Moss	L 1-3	40.0	1032	1066	27.07%	22.20%	50.73%	-0.54	-11.4	3
1960-05-01	Fredrikstad	L 0-3	35.0	1120	1203	34.84%	22.27%	42.89%	-0.43	-23.5	6
1960-05-01	@ Strommen	W 3-0	35.0	1203	1120	42.89%	22.27%	34.84%	+0.43	+23.5	14
1960-05-04	Viking	W 1-0	40.6	1124	1162	41.33%	22.32%	36.35%	-0.05	+8.9	12
1960-05-04	@ Lillestrom	L 0-1	40.6	1162	1124	36.35%	22.32%	41.33%	+0.05	-8.9	9
1960-05-08	Greaker	L 0-3	39.5	1088	1060	50.01%	22.22%	27.77%	+0.49	-31.6	8
1960-05-08	@ Brann	W 3-0	39.5	1060	1088	27.77%	22.22%	50.01%	-0.49	+31.6	9
1960-05-08	Sandefjord	W 2-1	41.3	1167	1104	54.17%	22.08%	23.75%	+0.78	+5.9	11
1960-05-08	@ Larvik Turn	L 1-2	41.3	1104	1167	23.75%	22.08%	54.17%	-0.78	-5.9	10
1960-05-08	Start	D 1-1	52.6	1133	1047	56.63%	21.95%	21.41%	+0.96	-1.9	13
1960-05-08	@ Lillestrom	D 1-1	52.6	1047	1133	21.41%	21.95%	56.63%	-0.96	+1.9	5
1960-05-08	Valerenga	W 4-0	34.1	1153	1180	42.84%	22.32%	34.84%	+0.04	+30.7	11
1960-05-08	@ Viking	L 0-4	34.1	1180	1153	34.84%	22.32%	42.84%	-0.04	-30.7	13
1960-05-08	IF Odd	W 5-1	36.3	1187	1153	50.68%	22.20%	27.12%	+0.53	+20.9	17
1960-05-08	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 1-5	36.3	1153	1187	27.12%	22.20%	50.68%	-0.53	-20.9	10
1960-05-08	Rapid Moss	W 4-0	28.1	1227	1077	62.70%	21.48%	15.82%	+1.49	+15.8	16
1960-05-08	@ Fredrikstad	L 0-4	28.1	1077	1227	15.82%	21.48%	62.70%	-1.49	-15.8	8
1960-05-08	Strommen	L 0-1	40.4	1021	1096	35.95%	22.29%	41.76%	-0.37	-8.8	3
1960-05-08	@ Raufoss	W 1-0	40.4	1096	1021	41.76%	22.29%	35.95%	+0.37	+8.8	8
1960-05-08	Brage	W 1-0	34.8	1192	1065	60.70%	21.66%	17.64%	+1.30	+4.9	13
1960-05-08	@ Skeid	L 0-1	34.8	1065	1192	17.64%	21.66%	60.70%	-1.30	-4.9	5
1960-05-15	Viking	L 1-3	42.0	1092	1184	33.67%	22.25%	44.08%	-0.50	-13.6	9
1960-05-15	@ Greaker	W 3-1	42.0	1184	1092	44.08%	22.25%	33.67%	+0.50	+13.6	13
1960-05-15	Lillestrom	W 3-0	32.4	1173	1131	51.63%	22.17%	26.20%	+0.60	+18.7	13
1960-05-15	@ Larvik Turn	L 0-3	32.4	1131	1173	26.20%	22.17%	51.63%	-0.60	-18.7	13
1960-05-15	Sandefjord	L 1-2	46.1	1049	1098	39.80%	22.32%	37.87%	-0.14	-9.0	5
1960-05-15	@ Start	W 2-1	46.1	1098	1049	37.87%	22.32%	39.80%	+0.14	+9.0	12
1960-05-15	Brann	W 7-0	31.1	1149	1056	57.35%	21.91%	20.74%	+1.02	+33.9	15
1960-05-15	@ Valerenga	L 0-7	31.1	1056	1149	20.74%	21.91%	57.35%	-1.02	-33.9	8
1960-05-15	Raufoss	D 2-2	57.7	1060	1012	52.45%	22.14%	25.40%	+0.66	-1.0	6
1960-05-15	@ Brage	D 2-2	57.7	1012	1060	25.40%	22.14%	52.45%	-0.66	+1.0	4
1960-05-15	Fredrikstad	L 0-1	42.4	1208	1242	41.70%	22.32%	35.98%	-0.03	-9.9	17
1960-05-15	@ Eik Tonsberg	W 1-0	42.4	1242	1208	35.98%	22.32%	41.70%	+0.03	+9.9	18
1960-05-15	IF Odd	D 1-1	52.5	1062	1132	36.63%	22.30%	41.08%	-0.33	+0.2	9
1960-05-15	@ Rapid Moss	D 1-1	52.5	1132	1062	41.08%	22.30%	36.63%	+0.33	-0.2	11
1960-05-15	Skeid	D 0-0	49.0	1105	1197	33.74%	22.25%	44.01%	-0.50	+0.6	9
1960-05-15	@ Strommen	D 0-0	49.0	1197	1105	44.01%	22.25%	33.74%	+0.50	-0.6	14
1960-05-22	Start	W 5-0	31.6	1078	1040	51.18%	22.19%	26.63%	+0.57	+30.5	11
1960-05-22	@ Greaker	L 0-5	31.6	1040	1078	26.63%	22.19%	51.18%	-0.57	-30.5	5
1960-05-22	Brann	W 5-3	45.1	1113	1022	57.10%	21.92%	20.98%	+1.00	+7.8	15
1960-05-22	@ Lillestrom	L 3-5	45.1	1022	1113	20.98%	21.92%	57.10%	-1.00	-7.8	8
1960-05-22	Valerenga	D 1-1	52.5	1107	1183	35.83%	22.29%	41.88%	-0.37	+0.3	13
1960-05-22	@ Sandefjord	D 1-1	52.5	1183	1107	41.88%	22.29%	35.83%	+0.37	-0.3	16
1960-05-22	Larvik Turn	W 3-2	48.6	1197	1191	47.23%	22.28%	30.49%	+0.31	+6.9	15
1960-05-22	@ Viking	L 2-3	48.6	1191	1197	30.49%	22.28%	47.23%	-0.31	-6.9	13
1960-05-22	Raufoss	D 1-1	53.1	1252	1013	69.36%	20.51%	10.13%	+2.23	-3.3	19
1960-05-22	@ Fredrikstad	D 1-1	53.1	1013	1252	10.13%	20.51%	69.36%	-2.23	+3.3	5
1960-05-22	Brage	W 3-1	38.6	1132	1059	55.26%	22.02%	22.72%	+0.86	+9.9	13
1960-05-22	@ IF Odd	L 1-3	38.6	1059	1132	22.72%	22.02%	55.26%	-0.86	-9.9	6
1960-05-22	Eik Tonsberg	W 3-1	41.5	1196	1198	46.23%	22.29%	31.47%	+0.24	+12.9	16
1960-05-22	@ Skeid	L 1-3	41.5	1198	1196	31.47%	22.29%	46.23%	-0.24	-12.9	17
1960-05-22	Rapid Moss	L 1-2	49.7	1106	1062	51.92%	22.16%	25.92%	+0.62	-11.2	9
1960-05-22	@ Strommen	W 2-1	49.7	1062	1106	25.92%	22.16%	51.92%	-0.62	+11.2	11
1960-05-28	Viking	D 1-1	52.7	1015	1204	22.15%	21.75%	56.10%	-1.31	+1.8	9
1960-05-28	@ Brann	D 1-1	52.7	1204	1015	56.10%	21.75%	22.15%	+1.31	-1.8	16
1960-05-28	Start	W 5-1	32.0	1184	1010	64.78%	21.24%	13.99%	+1.70	+11.7	15
1960-05-28	@ Larvik Turn	L 1-5	32.0	1010	1184	13.99%	21.24%	64.78%	-1.70	-11.7	5
1960-05-28	Sandefjord	W 4-1	38.5	1121	1107	48.21%	22.26%	29.53%	+0.37	+17.4	17
1960-05-28	@ Lillestrom	L 1-4	38.5	1107	1121	29.53%	22.26%	48.21%	-0.37	-17.4	13
1960-05-28	Greaker	L 1-5	44.7	1183	1108	55.40%	22.02%	22.58%	+0.87	-37.8	16
1960-05-28	@ Valerenga	W 5-1	44.7	1108	1183	22.58%	22.02%	55.40%	-0.87	+37.8	13
1960-05-29	Strommen	L 3-4	54.9	1049	1094	40.26%	22.32%	37.41%	-0.12	-8.4	6
1960-05-29	@ Brage	W 4-3	54.9	1094	1049	37.41%	22.32%	40.26%	+0.12	+8.4	11
1960-05-29	Rapid Moss	L 1-2	51.8	1185	1073	59.26%	21.78%	18.96%	+1.18	-12.7	17
1960-05-29	@ Eik Tonsberg	W 2-1	51.8	1073	1185	18.96%	21.78%	59.26%	-1.18	+12.7	13
1960-05-29	IF Odd	W 5-2	39.0	1249	1142	58.80%	21.81%	19.38%	+1.14	+10.5	21
1960-05-29	@ Fredrikstad	L 2-5	39.0	1142	1249	19.38%	21.81%	58.80%	-1.14	-10.5	13
1960-05-29	Skeid	D 4-4	64.9	1016	1209	21.83%	21.72%	56.45%	-1.34	+1.0	6
1960-05-29	@ Raufoss	D 4-4	64.9	1209	1016	56.45%	21.72%	21.83%	+1.34	-1.0	17
1960-06-12	Larvik Turn	W 4-1	46.0	1016	1196	23.17%	21.82%	55.01%	-1.23	+29.0	11
1960-06-12	@ Brann	L 1-4	46.0	1196	1016	55.01%	21.82%	23.17%	+1.23	-29.0	15
1960-06-12	Greaker	D 0-0	49.0	1090	1146	38.62%	22.31%	39.07%	-0.21	+0.0	14
1960-06-12	@ Sandefjord	D 0-0	49.0	1146	1090	39.07%	22.31%	38.62%	+0.21	-0.0	14
1960-06-12	Valerenga	L 0-1	37.6	998	1145	26.82%	22.02%	51.16%	-0.95	-6.9	5
1960-06-12	@ Start	W 1-0	37.6	1145	998	51.16%	22.02%	26.82%	+0.95	+6.9	18
1960-06-12	Lillestrom	L 0-4	39.9	1203	1138	54.33%	22.07%	23.60%	+0.79	-44.5	16
1960-06-12	@ Viking	W 4-0	39.9	1138	1203	23.60%	22.07%	54.33%	-0.79	+44.5	19
1960-06-12	Strommen	L 2-3	54.4	1131	1103	50.10%	22.22%	27.68%	+0.49	-10.3	13
1960-06-12	@ IF Odd	W 3-2	54.4	1103	1131	27.68%	22.22%	50.10%	-0.49	+10.3	13
1960-06-12	Brage	W 3-0	32.2	1086	1041	52.07%	22.16%	25.78%	+0.63	+18.4	15
1960-06-12	@ Rapid Moss	L 0-3	32.2	1041	1086	25.78%	22.16%	52.07%	-0.63	-18.4	6
1960-06-12	Eik Tonsberg	W 2-1	49.7	1017	1172	25.89%	21.98%	52.13%	-1.02	+11.3	8
1960-06-12	@ Raufoss	L 1-2	49.7	1172	1017	52.13%	21.98%	25.89%	+1.02	-11.3	17
1960-06-12	Fredrikstad	L 0-4	35.7	1208	1260	39.35%	22.32%	38.33%	-0.17	-33.8	17
1960-06-12	@ Skeid	W 4-0	35.7	1260	1208	38.33%	22.32%	39.35%	+0.17	+33.8	23

Playoff Game Log

Every playoff game for the team selected at the top of the tab (empty if they didn't reach the postseason). Sort any column by clicking its header. @ before an opponent name indicates an away game; the record column shows the team's running playoff record.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Record
1960-06-15	Lillestrom	W 6-2	36.5	1293	1182	59.18%	21.79%	19.04%	+1.17	+13.1	1-0
1960-06-15	@ Fredrikstad	L 2-6	36.5	1182	1293	19.04%	21.79%	59.18%	-1.17	-13.1	0-1
1960-06-16	Valerenga	W 4-2	45.5	1161	1152	47.59%	22.27%	30.13%	+0.33	+11.2	1-0
1960-06-16	@ Eik Tonsberg	L 2-4	45.5	1152	1161	30.13%	22.27%	47.59%	-0.33	-11.2	0-1

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	1959-10-11	16.33%	Rapid Moss	1053	2	@ Skeid	1196	1
2	1960-05-29	18.96%	Rapid Moss	1073	2	@ Eik Tonsberg	1185	1
3	1959-10-04	21.25%	Skeid	1157	5	@ Fredrikstad	1244	1
4	1960-05-28	22.58%	Greaker	1108	5	@ Valerenga	1183	1
5	1960-06-12	23.17%	@ Brann	1016	4	Larvik Turn	1196	1
6	1960-06-12	23.60%	Lillestrom	1138	4	@ Viking	1203	0
7	1960-06-12	25.89%	@ Raufoss	1017	2	Eik Tonsberg	1172	1
8	1960-05-22	25.92%	Rapid Moss	1062	2	@ Strommen	1106	1
9	1959-10-04	26.21%	Rapid Moss	1041	1	@ Brage	1082	0
10	1960-06-12	27.68%	Strommen	1103	3	@ IF Odd	1131	2
11	1960-05-08	27.77%	Greaker	1060	3	@ Brann	1088	0
12	1959-09-06	28.36%	Viking	1137	3	@ Larvik Turn	1160	1
13	1959-07-26	28.51%	Eik Tonsberg	1116	2	@ Strommen	1137	1
14	1959-09-27	28.83%	Lillestrom	1094	2	@ Sandefjord	1113	0
15	1959-09-06	29.49%	Lillestrom	1084	2	@ Brann	1098	1
16	1960-05-01	29.91%	Brann	1062	4	@ Start	1073	1
17	1959-07-26	31.75%	Viking	1138	3	@ Start	1135	2
18	1959-08-16	32.38%	Eik Tonsberg	1133	1	@ IF Odd	1125	0
19	1959-08-16	32.89%	Brann	1097	1	@ Greaker	1085	0
20	1960-05-01	33.82%	Skeid	1182	2	@ IF Odd	1163	1
21	1959-10-11	34.14%	Sandefjord	1092	1	@ Brann	1070	0
22	1959-10-25	34.31%	IF Odd	1153	1	@ Strommen	1130	0
23	1959-07-26	34.48%	Fredrikstad	1159	4	@ Brage	1135	0
24	1959-08-23	35.17%	Valerenga	1137	1	@ Brann	1108	0
25	1959-09-27	35.56%	Larvik Turn	1141	2	@ Start	1109	0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1960-06-12	44.52	Lillestrom	4	1138	23.60%	@ Viking	0	1203	54.33%	22.07%
2	1959-10-04	38.70	Skeid	5	1157	21.25%	@ Fredrikstad	1	1244	56.81%	21.94%
3	1960-05-28	37.78	Greaker	5	1108	22.58%	@ Valerenga	1	1183	55.40%	22.02%
4	1959-07-26	36.41	Fredrikstad	4	1159	34.48%	@ Brage	0	1135	43.20%	22.32%
5	1960-05-15	33.92	@ Valerenga	7	1149	57.35%	Brann	0	1056	20.74%	21.91%
6	1960-06-12	33.78	Fredrikstad	4	1260	38.33%	@ Skeid	0	1208	39.35%	22.32%
7	1960-05-08	31.60	Greaker	3	1060	27.77%	@ Brann	0	1088	50.01%	22.22%
8	1959-08-02	31.36	@ Larvik Turn	4	1127	41.90%	Valerenga	0	1160	35.78%	22.32%
9	1960-05-08	30.71	@ Viking	4	1153	42.84%	Valerenga	0	1180	34.84%	22.32%
10	1959-08-23	30.68	@ IF Odd	5	1114	50.96%	Rapid Moss	0	1078	26.85%	22.19%
11	1960-05-22	30.47	@ Greaker	5	1078	51.18%	Start	0	1040	26.63%	22.19%
12	1960-06-12	29.01	@ Brann	4	1016	23.17%	Larvik Turn	1	1196	55.01%	21.82%
13	1960-05-01	25.62	Brann	4	1062	29.91%	@ Start	1	1073	47.83%	22.27%
14	1959-08-16	25.61	@ Strommen	4	1114	49.98%	Raufoss	0	1087	27.80%	22.22%
15	1960-05-01	23.49	Fredrikstad	3	1203	42.89%	@ Strommen	0	1120	34.84%	22.27%
16	1959-09-27	23.42	@ Skeid	6	1133	53.54%	Raufoss	1	1076	24.36%	22.10%
17	1959-09-27	21.33	Lillestrom	2	1094	28.83%	@ Sandefjord	0	1113	48.92%	22.25%
18	1959-07-26	21.15	@ IF Odd	3	1114	47.20%	Raufoss	0	1108	30.52%	22.28%
19	1960-05-08	20.91	@ Eik Tonsberg	5	1187	50.68%	IF Odd	1	1153	27.12%	22.20%
20	1959-08-23	20.66	@ Raufoss	4	1061	40.95%	Brage	1	1101	36.72%	22.32%
21	1959-09-06	20.66	@ Valerenga	3	1147	48.09%	Sandefjord	0	1134	29.65%	22.26%
22	1959-08-23	19.66	Larvik Turn	5	1140	36.27%	@ Lillestrom	2	1103	41.41%	22.32%
23	1959-09-06	19.59	@ Eik Tonsberg	4	1130	43.37%	Skeid	1	1153	34.31%	22.32%
24	1959-07-26	19.38	@ Valerenga	3	1141	50.38%	Lillestrom	0	1110	27.41%	22.21%
25	1959-09-27	18.80	Larvik Turn	2	1141	35.56%	@ Start	0	1109	42.12%	22.32%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1960-05-29	64.9	@ Raufoss	4	1016	21.83%	Skeid	4	1209	56.45%	21.72%
2	1959-10-04	62.4	@ Valerenga	3	1183	57.28%	Start	3	1091	20.80%	21.91%
3	1959-09-27	57.8	@ Strommen	2	1148	54.67%	Brage	2	1081	23.28%	22.05%
4	1959-07-26	57.7	@ Sandefjord	2	1097	47.60%	Brann	2	1088	30.13%	22.27%
5	1959-09-27	57.7	@ Rapid Moss	2	1040	31.39%	Eik Tonsberg	2	1150	46.42%	22.19%
6	1960-05-15	57.7	@ Brage	2	1060	52.45%	Raufoss	2	1012	25.40%	22.14%
7	1960-05-29	54.9	Strommen	4	1094	37.41%	@ Brage	3	1049	40.26%	22.32%
8	1960-06-12	54.4	Strommen	3	1103	27.68%	@ IF Odd	2	1131	50.10%	22.22%
9	1959-07-26	53.2	Viking	3	1138	31.75%	@ Start	2	1135	45.95%	22.30%
10	1960-05-22	53.1	@ Fredrikstad	1	1252	69.36%	Raufoss	1	1013	10.13%	20.51%
11	1959-10-11	52.8	@ Fredrikstad	1	1206	61.49%	Brage	1	1070	16.92%	21.59%
12	1959-09-27	52.7	@ IF Odd	1	1145	32.58%	Fredrikstad	1	1245	45.20%	22.22%
13	1959-10-11	52.7	@ Larvik Turn	1	1177	60.78%	Greaker	1	1049	17.56%	21.66%
14	1960-04-24	52.7	@ Viking	1	1174	59.47%	Brann	1	1060	18.77%	21.76%
15	1960-05-28	52.7	@ Brann	1	1015	22.15%	Viking	1	1204	56.10%	21.75%
16	1959-08-23	52.6	@ Viking	1	1138	54.26%	Greaker	1	1074	23.67%	22.07%
17	1959-08-23	52.6	@ Skeid	1	1154	48.24%	Strommen	1	1140	29.50%	22.26%
18	1959-10-11	52.6	Rapid Moss	2	1053	16.33%	@ Skeid	1	1196	62.14%	21.53%
19	1960-05-08	52.6	@ Lillestrom	1	1133	56.63%	Start	1	1047	21.41%	21.95%
20	1959-08-02	52.5	@ Raufoss	1	1087	45.32%	Rapid Moss	1	1096	32.38%	22.30%
21	1959-09-06	52.5	@ Brage	1	1081	37.56%	IF Odd	1	1145	40.14%	22.31%
22	1960-04-30	52.5	@ Greaker	1	1060	37.47%	Lillestrom	1	1125	40.23%	22.31%
23	1960-05-15	52.5	@ Rapid Moss	1	1062	36.63%	IF Odd	1	1132	41.08%	22.30%
24	1960-05-22	52.5	@ Sandefjord	1	1107	35.83%	Valerenga	1	1183	41.88%	22.29%
25	1960-05-29	51.8	Rapid Moss	2	1073	18.96%	@ Eik Tonsberg	1	1185	59.26%	21.78%

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1960-05-08	28.1	@ Fredrikstad	4	1227	62.70%	Rapid Moss	0	1077	15.82%	21.48%
2	1960-05-15	31.1	@ Valerenga	7	1149	57.35%	Brann	0	1056	20.74%	21.91%
3	1959-10-04	31.3	@ Larvik Turn	3	1160	55.26%	Brann	0	1087	22.72%	22.02%
4	1960-05-22	31.6	@ Greaker	5	1078	51.18%	Start	0	1040	26.63%	22.19%
5	1959-08-23	31.7	@ IF Odd	5	1114	50.96%	Rapid Moss	0	1078	26.85%	22.19%
6	1959-08-16	31.9	@ Strommen	4	1114	49.98%	Raufoss	0	1087	27.80%	22.22%
7	1960-05-28	32.0	@ Larvik Turn	5	1184	64.78%	Start	1	1010	13.99%	21.24%
8	1960-06-12	32.2	@ Rapid Moss	3	1086	52.07%	Brage	0	1041	25.78%	22.16%
9	1960-05-15	32.4	@ Larvik Turn	3	1173	51.63%	Lillestrom	0	1131	26.20%	22.17%
10	1959-07-26	32.7	@ Valerenga	3	1141	50.38%	Lillestrom	0	1110	27.41%	22.21%
11	1959-09-06	33.4	@ Valerenga	3	1147	48.09%	Sandefjord	0	1134	29.65%	22.26%
12	1959-07-26	33.7	@ IF Odd	3	1114	47.20%	Raufoss	0	1108	30.52%	22.28%
13	1960-05-08	34.1	@ Viking	4	1153	42.84%	Valerenga	0	1180	34.84%	22.32%
14	1959-08-02	34.3	@ Larvik Turn	4	1127	41.90%	Valerenga	0	1160	35.78%	22.32%
15	1959-09-27	34.4	@ Skeid	6	1133	53.54%	Raufoss	1	1076	24.36%	22.10%
16	1960-05-08	34.8	@ Skeid	1	1192	60.70%	Brage	0	1065	17.64%	21.66%
17	1960-05-01	35.0	Fredrikstad	3	1203	42.89%	@ Strommen	0	1120	34.84%	22.27%
18	1959-10-11	35.1	@ Viking	5	1155	54.22%	Start	1	1092	23.71%	22.07%
19	1959-10-04	35.7	@ Eik Tonsberg	4	1149	57.78%	Raufoss	1	1052	20.34%	21.88%
20	1960-06-12	35.7	Fredrikstad	4	1260	38.33%	@ Skeid	0	1208	39.35%	22.32%
21	1959-08-23	36.3	@ Fredrikstad	4	1226	56.22%	Eik Tonsberg	1	1144	21.81%	21.97%
22	1960-05-08	36.3	@ Eik Tonsberg	5	1187	50.68%	IF Odd	1	1153	27.12%	22.20%
23	1959-09-27	36.4	Valerenga	2	1167	45.60%	@ Greaker	0	1064	32.19%	22.21%
24	1960-06-15 *	36.5	@ Fredrikstad	6	1293	59.18%	Lillestrom	2	1182	19.04%	21.79%
25	1959-07-26	36.6	Fredrikstad	4	1159	34.48%	@ Brage	0	1135	43.20%	22.32%