‹ ›

1989 First Division Season

132 games

Final

Champion

Lillestrom

52 points · 5th Title

Last Title: 1986

Relegated

Mjolner

15 pts

Sogndal · 18 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Lillestrom

11.26 points above expected

52 points · 40.74 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Mjolner

8.79 points below expected

15 points · 23.79 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Lillestrom Champion 22 16 4 2 52 31 13 +18 40.74 +11.26
2 Rosenborg 22 13 5 4 44 56 29 +27 42.16 +1.84
3 Tromso 22 11 4 7 37 36 25 +11 34.69 +2.31
4 Molde 22 11 4 7 37 40 32 +8 35.10 +1.90
5 Kongsvinger 22 10 4 8 34 34 25 +9 31.92 +2.08
6 Viking 22 9 4 9 31 36 33 +3 26.88 +4.12
7 Brann 22 9 3 10 30 28 31 -3 25.98 +4.02
8 Moss 22 7 5 10 26 35 36 -1 33.52 -7.52
9 Start 22 5 8 9 23 26 34 -8 22.71 +0.29
10 Valerenga 22 7 2 13 23 29 52 -23 27.35 -4.35
11 Sogndal Relegated 22 4 6 12 18 31 45 -14 25.10 -7.10
12 Mjolner Relegated 22 4 3 15 15 23 50 -27 23.79 -8.79

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Lillestrom 52 40.74 +11.26
2 Viking 31 26.88 +4.12
3 Brann 30 25.98 +4.02
4 Tromso 37 34.69 +2.31
5 Kongsvinger 34 31.92 +2.08

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Mjolner 15 23.79 -8.79
2 Moss 26 33.52 -7.52
3 Sogndal 18 25.10 -7.10
4 Valerenga 23 27.35 -4.35
5 Start 23 22.71 +0.29

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Lillestrom 5 Jul 23 – Aug 20 1 in 37
2 Kongsvinger 4 Aug 27 – Sep 24 1 in 27
3 Valerenga 3 Jun 25 – Jul 9 1 in 25
4 Start 2 Jul 2 – Jul 9 1 in 14
5 Sogndal 2 Aug 27 – Aug 30 1 in 14

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Valerenga 9 Aug 6 – Oct 8 1 in 1,176
2 Viking 5 Jun 18 – Jul 23 1 in 60
3 Moss 4 Jun 18 – Jul 9 1 in 55
4 Mjolner 6 Aug 6 – Sep 10 1 in 48
5 Brann 4 Sep 10 – Oct 8 1 in 36

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Start 7 Jul 2 – Aug 20 1 in 129
2 Lillestrom 11 Jul 23 – Oct 8 1 in 26
3 Viking 5 May 16 – Jun 11 1 in 20
4 Rosenborg 8 Jul 9 – Aug 30 1 in 12
5 Molde 6 Jun 4 – Jul 9 1 in 8

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Moss 9 May 28 – Jul 30 1 in 324
2 Valerenga 11 Jul 23 – Oct 8 1 in 102
3 Sogndal 10 Apr 30 – Jul 2 1 in 56
4 Kongsvinger 7 May 7 – Jun 18 1 in 48
5 Viking 6 Jun 18 – Jul 30 1 in 15

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Lillestrom 1446 52 +19 13 10.2 +2.8
Rosenborg 1464 44 +26 10 10.9 -0.9
Molde 1303 37 +9 10 8.4 +1.6
Tromso 1329 37 +3 7 7.9 -0.9
Kongsvinger 1346 34 +51 12 9.0 +3.0
Viking 1236 31 +13 7 4.6 +2.4
Brann 1234 30 -25 3 6.3 -3.3
Moss 1289 26 +11 6 6.1 -0.1
Start 1190 23 +6 6 4.8 +1.2
Valerenga 1100 23 -77 0 4.8 -4.8
Sogndal 1175 18 +7 7 5.4 +1.6
Mjolner 1105 15 -44 4 5.6 -1.6

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team BRA KON LIL MJO MOL MOS ROS SOG STA TRO VAL VIK
Brann —
1-0-1
2.53
1-0-1
1.46
2-0-0
3.15
1-0-1
2.08
1-0-1
2.04
0-1-1
1.68
1-1-0
2.98
0-0-2
3.44
0-1-1
2.07
1-0-1
2.58
1-0-1
2.95
Kongsvinger
1-0-1
3.07
—
0-1-1
2.00
0-1-1
3.49
2-0-0
2.20
2-0-0
2.57
0-1-1
2.12
1-0-1
3.77
1-1-0
3.56
1-0-1
2.45
1-0-1
3.40
1-0-1
3.29
Lillestrom
1-0-1
4.16
1-1-0
3.59
—
2-0-0
4.01
2-0-0
2.89
2-0-0
3.65
0-1-1
2.86
2-0-0
3.75
1-1-0
4.33
1-1-0
3.30
2-0-0
3.48
2-0-0
3.83
Mjolner
0-0-2
2.44
1-1-0
2.11
0-0-2
1.61
—
0-0-2
1.75
1-0-1
1.77
0-0-2
1.56
0-1-1
2.57
1-0-1
2.88
0-0-2
2.13
1-0-1
2.60
0-1-1
2.56
Molde
1-0-1
3.52
0-0-2
3.40
0-0-2
2.69
2-0-0
3.86
—
0-1-1
2.85
1-1-0
2.45
2-0-0
3.72
1-1-0
3.80
1-1-0
2.84
2-0-0
3.35
1-0-1
3.66
Moss
1-0-1
3.54
0-0-2
3.02
0-0-2
1.95
1-0-1
3.84
1-1-0
2.74
—
0-0-2
1.94
0-1-1
3.70
1-1-0
3.60
1-0-1
2.54
1-1-0
3.17
1-1-0
3.37
Rosenborg
1-1-0
3.93
1-1-0
3.48
1-1-0
2.73
2-0-0
4.05
0-1-1
3.15
2-0-0
3.67
—
2-0-0
3.98
1-1-0
4.29
1-0-1
3.36
1-0-1
4.31
1-0-1
4.06
Sogndal
0-1-1
2.60
1-0-1
1.82
0-0-2
1.87
1-1-0
3.02
0-0-2
1.88
1-1-0
1.90
0-0-2
1.63
—
0-1-1
3.02
0-1-1
1.94
1-0-1
2.60
0-1-1
2.71
Start
2-0-0
2.15
0-1-1
2.04
0-1-1
1.30
1-0-1
2.70
0-1-1
1.81
0-1-1
1.99
0-1-1
1.34
1-1-0
2.56
—
0-0-2
1.73
0-1-1
2.30
1-1-0
2.36
Tromso
1-1-0
3.53
1-0-1
3.14
0-1-1
2.30
2-0-0
3.46
0-1-1
2.75
1-0-1
3.05
1-0-1
2.23
1-1-0
3.67
2-0-0
3.89
—
1-0-1
3.56
1-0-1
3.59
Valerenga
1-0-1
3.01
1-0-1
2.22
0-0-2
2.11
1-0-1
2.99
0-0-2
2.24
0-1-1
2.43
1-0-1
1.30
1-0-1
3.00
1-1-0
3.29
1-0-1
2.04
—
0-0-2
3.18
Viking
1-0-1
2.64
1-0-1
2.31
0-0-2
1.78
1-1-0
3.03
1-0-1
1.94
0-1-1
2.23
1-0-1
1.54
1-1-0
2.89
0-1-1
3.24
1-0-1
2.01
2-0-0
2.41
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.35 +7.5
Allowed 0.77 -8.5
Differential 0.83 +6.1

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
05.30%8.71%7.58%3.41%0.38%1.14%26.52%
18.71%6.82%4.92%4.17%3.03%0.76%28.41%
27.58%4.92%6.06%2.65%2.27%0.76%24.24%
33.41%4.17%2.65%1.52%0.38%—12.12%
40.38%3.03%2.27%0.38%——6.06%
5+1.14%0.76%0.76%———2.65%
Total26.52%28.41%24.24%12.12%6.06%2.65%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.53 1.53 +0.00
SD 1.40 1.40 2.05
CV 0.91 0.91 —
Max 8 8 +7
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 132

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%13.64%4.55%9.09%4.55%—40.91%
113.64%—4.55%———18.18%
213.64%—4.55%—9.09%—27.27%
3———————
4—9.09%4.55%———13.64%
5+———————
Total36.36%22.73%18.18%9.09%13.64%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.27 1.41 -0.14
SD 1.39 1.44 2.03
CV 1.09 1.02 —
Max 4 4 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%18.18%————27.27%
113.64%4.55%4.55%4.55%4.55%4.55%36.36%
24.55%—4.55%———9.09%
39.09%4.55%————13.64%
4—9.09%————9.09%
5+4.55%—————4.55%
Total40.91%36.36%9.09%4.55%4.55%4.55%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.55 1.14 +0.41
SD 1.50 1.52 2.30
CV 0.97 1.34 —
Max 5 6 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%—4.55%———13.64%
136.36%9.09%—4.55%——50.00%
24.55%13.64%————18.18%
39.09%4.55%4.55%———18.18%
4———————
5+———————
Total59.09%27.27%9.09%4.55%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.41 0.59 +0.82
SD 0.96 0.85 1.22
CV 0.68 1.45 —
Max 3 3 +3
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—9.09%22.73%4.55%—4.55%40.91%
1—9.09%13.64%—4.55%—27.27%
24.55%4.55%——4.55%4.55%18.18%
3—9.09%—4.55%——13.64%
4———————
5+———————
Total4.55%31.82%36.36%9.09%9.09%9.09%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.05 2.27 -1.23
SD 1.09 1.70 2.09
CV 1.04 0.75 —
Max 3 7 +2
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%4.55%4.55%9.09%——22.73%
14.55%9.09%—4.55%9.09%—27.27%
24.55%18.18%4.55%———27.27%
3—9.09%————9.09%
4——4.55%———4.55%
5+9.09%—————9.09%
Total22.73%40.91%13.64%13.64%9.09%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.82 1.45 +0.36
SD 1.76 1.26 2.56
CV 0.97 0.87 —
Max 7 4 +7
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%4.55%13.64%———22.73%
14.55%9.09%—4.55%4.55%—22.73%
213.64%—9.09%13.64%4.55%—40.91%
34.55%—————4.55%
4——4.55%———4.55%
5+—4.55%————4.55%
Total27.27%18.18%27.27%18.18%9.09%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.59 1.64 -0.05
SD 1.30 1.33 1.89
CV 0.82 0.81 —
Max 5 4 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%—4.55%———13.64%
14.55%4.55%—4.55%——13.64%
213.64%4.55%9.09%4.55%——31.82%
3—4.55%4.55%—4.55%—13.64%
44.55%9.09%4.55%———18.18%
5+——9.09%———9.09%
Total31.82%22.73%31.82%9.09%4.55%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.55 1.32 +1.23
SD 1.95 1.17 2.02
CV 0.76 0.89 —
Max 8 4 +6
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%13.64%4.55%4.55%——27.27%
1—4.55%9.09%4.55%4.55%—22.73%
2—9.09%9.09%9.09%4.55%—31.82%
3—4.55%4.55%9.09%——18.18%
4———————
5+———————
Total4.55%31.82%27.27%27.27%9.09%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.41 2.05 -0.64
SD 1.10 1.09 1.29
CV 0.78 0.53 —
Max 3 4 +2
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%9.09%9.09%4.55%——27.27%
19.09%13.64%9.09%4.55%4.55%—40.91%
2—4.55%13.64%———18.18%
34.55%4.55%—4.55%——13.64%
4———————
5+———————
Total18.18%31.82%31.82%13.64%4.55%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.18 1.55 -0.36
SD 1.01 1.10 1.50
CV 0.85 0.71 —
Max 3 4 +3
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%4.55%4.55%4.55%——22.73%
19.09%9.09%4.55%9.09%——31.82%
29.09%———4.55%—13.64%
313.64%4.55%4.55%———22.73%
4—9.09%————9.09%
5+———————
Total40.91%27.27%13.64%13.64%4.55%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.64 1.14 +0.50
SD 1.33 1.25 1.97
CV 0.81 1.10 —
Max 4 4 +3
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—9.09%9.09%——9.09%27.27%
14.55%—9.09%4.55%4.55%4.55%27.27%
213.64%—9.09%4.55%—4.55%31.82%
3—4.55%9.09%———13.64%
4———————
5+———————
Total18.18%13.64%36.36%9.09%4.55%18.18%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.32 2.36 -1.05
SD 1.04 2.01 2.42
CV 0.79 0.85 —
Max 3 8 +2
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—18.18%9.09%4.55%——31.82%
14.55%9.09%4.55%4.55%——22.73%
29.09%4.55%9.09%———22.73%
3——4.55%———4.55%
4——9.09%4.55%——13.64%
5+—4.55%————4.55%
Total13.64%36.36%36.36%13.64%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.64 1.50 +0.14
SD 1.68 0.91 1.83
CV 1.03 0.61 —
Max 6 3 +5
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Rosenborg 1464 44 42.16 +1.84 66.0% 30 34 38 42 46 50 62
Lillestrom 1446 52 40.74 +11.26 100.0% 26 32 37 40 44 50 51
Kongsvinger 1346 34 31.92 +2.08 70.0% 13 22 28 31 36 43 50
Tromso 1329 37 34.69 +2.31 69.0% 20 24 30 35 39 43 49
Molde 1303 37 35.10 +1.90 70.0% 21 24 30 35 39 44 52
Moss 1289 26 33.52 -7.52 16.0% 17 23 30 34 37 44 53
Viking 1236 31 26.88 +4.12 79.0% 11 18 23 27 31 38 43
Brann 1234 30 25.98 +4.02 86.0% 8 15 23 27 29 33 44
Start 1190 23 22.71 +0.29 59.0% 9 12 19 23 27 31 37
Sogndal 1175 18 25.10 -7.10 9.0% 9 14 22 25 28 35 42
Mjolner 1105 15 23.79 -8.79 12.0% 4 12 19 24 29 35 40
Valerenga 1100 23 27.35 -4.35 22.0% 12 15 24 28 32 37 42

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 14.5% * Slight Edge: 14.5% to 17.5% * Clear Edge: 17.5% to 23% * Strong Edge: 23% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+27.27%
Strong Edge
53.79%19.70%26.52%
Elo Value
Home Edge
164 Elo
0.006 goals per Elo point
097.22500
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.60 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.59+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 6th * Longshot: 7th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.09 * Tight Race: 0.09 to 0.21 * Comfortable: 0.21 to 0.29 * Runaway: 0.29 and up.
Title-Race Openness
3.0
One-Team Race
134610
Champion Preseason Odds
29%
Lillestrom, 2nd of 12
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.36/gm
Runaway
00.190.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 4.8 * Some Luck: 4.8 to 7.2 * Lucky: 7.2 to 9.6 * Wild Swing: 9.6 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.58 * Close: 1.58 to 2.37 * Off: 2.37 to 3.17 * Way Off: 3.17 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 12 * As Expected: 12 to 19.2 * Several Outliers: 19.2 to 26.4 * Many Outliers: 26.4 and up.
Unexpected Relegations
Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 1.08 * A Surprise: 1.08 to 1.73 * Several Surprises: 1.73 to 2.38 * Many Surprises: 2.38 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
5.63 points
Some Luck
06.0015
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.67
Close
01.984
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.83%
100.00%
Lillestrom
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 4.17%
9.00%
Sogndal
050
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 12
Minimal Outliers
01.26
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
1 of 2
As Expected
01.12

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.14 * Even: 0.14 to 0.16 * Top-Heavy: 0.16 to 0.19 * Lopsided: 0.19 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.55 * Strong Separation: 1.55 to 1.75 * Wide Separation: 1.75 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 61.5% * Slight Edge: 61.5% to 65% * Clear Edge: 65% to 69.5% * Wide Edge: 69.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82% * Clear Edge: 82% to 87.5% * Strong Edge: 87.5% to 92.5% * Dominant: 92.5% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 53.5% * Some Drama: 53.5% to 58% * Frequent: 58% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16% * Occasional: 16% to 19% * Frequent: 19% to 25% * Very Frequent: 25% and up.
Gini Index
0.19
Top-Heavy
00.140.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 118.15
1.69
Strong Separation
0.91.351.551.752.5
Interquartile Edge
70%
Wide Edge
50%61.5%69.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
89%
Strong Edge
50%91%100%
Close Games
Expected
53%
Few
0%53%100%
Blowouts
Expected
19%
Occasional
0%22%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.32 * Slight Separation: 0.32 to 0.34 * Notable Separation: 0.34 to 0.38 * Lopsided: 0.38 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.28 * Some Carryover: 0.28 to 0.48 * Strong Carryover: 0.48 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23.5% * As Expected: 23.5% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 27.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 27.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19% * As Expected: 19% to 22% * Shaky Favorites: 22% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.56
Highly Predictable
00.582
Matchup Imbalance
0.37
Notable Separation
00.320.380.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.94
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.64
Near-Lock
00.280.481
Upset Rate
Expected
20%
Chalky
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
20%
As Expected
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.13 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.13 to 0.2 * Above Noise: 0.2 to 0.27 * Well Above Noise: 0.27 and up.
Probability calibration
0.87
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.11
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.069
Well Within Noise
00.1350.3

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456789101112
Lillestrom29.00%31.00%22.00%6.00%7.00%2.00%1.00%1.00%—1.00%——
Rosenborg49.00%20.00%17.00%6.00%5.00%2.00%1.00%—————
Tromso6.00%14.00%7.00%29.00%13.00%9.00%6.00%7.00%7.00%1.00%—1.00%
Molde6.00%14.00%15.00%16.00%16.00%12.00%7.00%5.00%4.00%2.00%1.00%2.00%
Kongsvinger4.00%6.00%13.00%10.00%13.00%16.00%13.00%9.00%6.00%4.00%3.00%3.00%
Viking—2.00%3.00%2.00%10.00%8.00%12.00%13.00%13.00%16.00%14.00%7.00%
Brann——3.00%2.00%6.00%8.00%14.00%15.00%19.00%13.00%12.00%8.00%
Moss5.00%11.00%10.00%19.00%15.00%12.00%7.00%5.00%6.00%4.00%5.00%1.00%
Start———3.00%3.00%6.00%4.00%6.00%15.00%15.00%26.00%22.00%
Valerenga—1.00%4.00%2.00%7.00%15.00%12.00%17.00%10.00%9.00%13.00%10.00%
Sogndal——3.00%4.00%3.00%5.00%11.00%10.00%14.00%22.00%14.00%14.00%
Mjolner1.00%1.00%3.00%1.00%2.00%5.00%12.00%12.00%6.00%13.00%12.00%32.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Qualified for relegation playoff Direct relegation
Lillestrom 99.00% 1.00% —
Rosenborg 100% — —
Tromso 98.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Molde 95.00% 2.00% 3.00%
Kongsvinger 90.00% 4.00% 6.00%
Moss 90.00% 4.00% 6.00%
Brann 67.00% 13.00% 20.00%
Viking 63.00% 16.00% 21.00%
Valerenga 68.00% 9.00% 23.00%
Sogndal 50.00% 22.00% 28.00%
Mjolner 43.00% 13.00% 44.00%
Start 37.00% 15.00% 48.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1989-04-30 Molde W 1-041.3 1285 1350 44.16% 20.85% 35.00%+0.20 +10.5 3
1989-04-30 @ Kongsvinger L 0-141.3 1350 1285 35.00% 20.85% 44.16%-0.20 -10.5 0
1989-04-30 Valerenga W 1-034.7 1335 1223 64.39% 19.34% 16.27%+1.27 +5.4 3
1989-04-30 @ Lillestrom L 0-134.7 1223 1335 16.27% 19.34% 64.39%-1.27 -5.4 0
1989-04-30 Sogndal W 3-244.2 1373 1242 66.15% 19.05% 14.80%+1.39 +4.4 3
1989-04-30 @ Rosenborg L 2-344.2 1242 1373 14.80% 19.05% 66.15%-1.39 -4.4 0
1989-04-30 Moss L 0-140.0 1175 1318 33.29% 20.81% 45.90%-0.28 -10.1 0
1989-04-30 @ Start W 1-040.0 1318 1175 45.90% 20.81% 33.29%+0.28 +10.1 3
1989-04-30 Mjolner W 2-033.4 1278 1242 56.81% 20.24% 22.96%+0.81 +13.8 3
1989-04-30 @ Tromso L 0-233.4 1242 1278 22.96% 20.24% 56.81%-0.81 -13.8 0
1989-04-30 Brann W 4-245.0 1178 1215 47.83% 20.75% 31.42%+0.36 +14.0 3
1989-04-30 @ Viking L 2-445.0 1215 1178 31.42% 20.75% 47.83%-0.36 -14.0 0
1989-05-07 Tromso L 0-336.2 1201 1292 40.47% 20.89% 38.64%+0.04 -32.3 0
1989-05-07 @ Brann W 3-036.2 1292 1201 38.64% 20.89% 40.47%-0.04 +32.3 6
1989-05-07 Kongsvinger D 1-154.7 1228 1296 43.81% 20.85% 35.34%+0.18 -0.5 1
1989-05-07 @ Mjolner D 1-154.7 1296 1228 35.34% 20.85% 43.81%-0.18 +0.5 4
1989-05-07 Rosenborg W 3-142.8 1339 1378 47.71% 20.76% 31.53%+0.36 +15.7 3
1989-05-07 @ Molde L 1-342.8 1378 1339 31.53% 20.76% 47.71%-0.36 -15.7 3
1989-05-07 Viking W 2-030.4 1328 1192 66.54% 18.98% 14.48%+1.42 +9.0 6
1989-05-07 @ Moss L 0-230.4 1192 1328 14.48% 18.98% 66.54%-1.42 -9.0 3
1989-05-07 Lillestrom L 0-142.1 1238 1340 38.84% 20.89% 40.27%-0.03 -11.4 0
1989-05-07 @ Sogndal W 1-042.1 1340 1238 40.27% 20.89% 38.84%+0.03 +11.4 6
1989-05-07 Start W 2-032.5 1218 1165 58.66% 20.07% 21.27%+0.91 +12.9 3
1989-05-07 @ Valerenga L 0-232.5 1165 1218 21.27% 20.07% 58.66%-0.91 -12.9 0
1989-05-16 Moss W 2-041.3 1169 1337 30.05% 20.70% 49.25%-0.43 +26.2 3
1989-05-16 @ Brann L 0-241.3 1337 1169 49.25% 20.70% 30.05%+0.43 -26.2 6
1989-05-16 Molde W 3-141.4 1351 1355 52.14% 20.56% 27.29%+0.57 +13.9 9
1989-05-16 @ Lillestrom L 1-341.4 1355 1351 27.29% 20.56% 52.14%-0.57 -13.9 3
1989-05-16 Mjolner W 6-233.6 1362 1228 66.39% 19.01% 14.61%+1.41 +12.2 6
1989-05-16 @ Rosenborg L 2-633.6 1228 1362 14.61% 19.01% 66.39%-1.41 -12.2 1
1989-05-16 Sogndal W 1-040.7 1152 1226 42.83% 20.87% 36.30%+0.14 +10.8 3
1989-05-16 @ Start L 0-140.7 1226 1152 36.30% 20.87% 42.83%-0.14 -10.8 0
1989-05-16 Kongsvinger W 1-037.7 1324 1296 55.93% 20.31% 23.76%+0.76 +7.6 9
1989-05-16 @ Tromso L 0-137.7 1296 1324 23.76% 20.31% 55.93%-0.76 -7.6 4
1989-05-16 Valerenga W 1-039.7 1183 1231 46.40% 20.80% 32.80%+0.30 +10.0 6
1989-05-16 @ Viking L 0-139.7 1231 1183 32.80% 20.80% 46.40%-0.30 -10.0 3
1989-05-25 Rosenborg D 2-260.8 1289 1374 41.21% 20.88% 37.91%+0.07 -0.1 5
1989-05-25 @ Kongsvinger D 2-260.8 1374 1289 37.91% 20.88% 41.21%-0.07 +0.2 7
1989-05-25 Lillestrom L 0-236.6 1216 1365 32.37% 20.79% 46.85%-0.32 -18.6 1
1989-05-25 @ Mjolner W 2-036.6 1365 1216 46.85% 20.79% 32.37%+0.32 +18.5 12
1989-05-25 Start W 2-137.7 1341 1163 69.87% 18.29% 11.84%+1.68 +3.7 6
1989-05-25 @ Molde L 1-237.7 1163 1341 11.84% 18.29% 69.87%-1.68 -3.7 3
1989-05-25 Tromso W 2-036.2 1311 1332 49.94% 20.67% 29.39%+0.46 +17.1 9
1989-05-25 @ Moss L 0-236.2 1332 1311 29.39% 20.67% 49.94%-0.46 -17.1 9
1989-05-25 Viking D 2-259.7 1216 1193 55.32% 20.36% 24.33%+0.73 -1.5 1
1989-05-25 @ Sogndal D 2-259.7 1193 1216 24.33% 20.36% 55.32%-0.73 +1.5 7
1989-05-25 Brann W 2-033.4 1221 1195 55.66% 20.33% 24.01%+0.75 +14.4 6
1989-05-25 @ Valerenga L 0-233.4 1195 1221 24.01% 20.33% 55.66%-0.75 -14.4 3
1989-05-28 Sogndal W 1-039.0 1181 1214 48.39% 20.73% 30.87%+0.39 +9.5 6
1989-05-28 @ Brann L 0-139.0 1214 1181 30.87% 20.73% 48.39%-0.39 -9.5 1
1989-05-28 Kongsvinger D 0-052.2 1384 1288 62.92% 19.56% 17.52%+1.17 -3.4 13
1989-05-28 @ Lillestrom D 0-052.2 1288 1384 17.52% 19.56% 62.92%-1.17 +3.4 6
1989-05-28 Valerenga D 2-260.4 1328 1235 62.63% 19.60% 17.77%+1.15 -2.2 10
1989-05-28 @ Moss D 2-260.4 1235 1328 17.77% 19.60% 62.63%-1.15 +2.2 7
1989-05-28 Mjolner L 1-248.9 1159 1197 47.77% 20.76% 31.47%+0.36 -12.8 3
1989-05-28 @ Start W 2-148.9 1197 1159 31.47% 20.76% 47.77%-0.36 +12.8 4
1989-05-28 Rosenborg W 2-038.2 1315 1374 44.85% 20.83% 34.32%+0.23 +19.5 12
1989-05-28 @ Tromso L 0-238.2 1374 1315 34.32% 20.83% 44.85%-0.23 -19.5 7
1989-05-28 Molde W 2-040.8 1194 1345 32.21% 20.78% 47.01%-0.33 +25.1 10
1989-05-28 @ Viking L 0-240.8 1345 1194 47.01% 20.78% 32.21%+0.33 -25.1 6
1989-06-04 Start D 0-051.1 1292 1147 67.32% 18.83% 13.85%+1.48 -4.0 7
1989-06-04 @ Kongsvinger D 0-051.1 1147 1292 13.85% 18.83% 67.32%-1.48 +4.0 4
1989-06-04 Viking D 1-154.5 1210 1219 51.45% 20.60% 27.95%+0.53 -1.5 5
1989-06-04 @ Mjolner D 1-154.5 1219 1210 27.95% 20.60% 51.45%-0.53 +1.5 11
1989-06-04 Brann W 2-138.8 1320 1190 65.99% 19.08% 14.93%+1.38 +4.7 9
1989-06-04 @ Molde L 1-238.8 1190 1320 14.93% 19.08% 65.99%-1.38 -4.7 6
1989-06-04 Lillestrom W 3-142.6 1355 1380 49.41% 20.70% 29.90%+0.44 +15.0 10
1989-06-04 @ Rosenborg L 1-342.6 1380 1355 29.90% 20.70% 49.41%-0.44 -15.0 13
1989-06-04 Moss D 0-050.8 1205 1326 36.21% 20.87% 42.92%-0.14 +0.5 2
1989-06-04 @ Sogndal D 0-050.8 1326 1205 42.92% 20.87% 36.21%+0.14 -0.5 11
1989-06-04 Tromso W 3-143.9 1238 1334 39.64% 20.89% 39.47%+0.00 +18.9 10
1989-06-04 @ Valerenga L 1-343.9 1334 1238 39.47% 20.89% 39.64%+0.00 -18.9 12
1989-06-11 Mjolner W 4-244.4 1186 1208 49.74% 20.68% 29.58%+0.45 +13.3 9
1989-06-11 @ Brann L 2-444.4 1208 1186 29.58% 20.68% 49.74%-0.45 -13.3 5
1989-06-11 Molde D 1-155.6 1325 1324 52.68% 20.53% 26.78%+0.60 -1.6 12
1989-06-11 @ Moss D 1-155.6 1324 1325 26.78% 20.53% 52.68%-0.60 +1.6 10
1989-06-11 Rosenborg L 0-233.7 1151 1370 24.09% 20.34% 55.58%-0.74 -14.4 4
1989-06-11 @ Start W 2-033.7 1370 1151 55.58% 20.34% 24.09%+0.74 +14.4 13
1989-06-11 Lillestrom D 1-155.9 1315 1365 46.16% 20.80% 33.03%+0.29 -0.8 13
1989-06-11 @ Tromso D 1-155.9 1365 1315 33.03% 20.80% 46.16%-0.29 +0.8 14
1989-06-11 Sogndal W 3-245.8 1256 1205 58.50% 20.08% 21.42%+0.90 +6.2 13
1989-06-11 @ Valerenga L 2-345.8 1205 1256 21.42% 20.08% 58.50%-0.90 -6.2 2
1989-06-11 Kongsvinger W 6-137.1 1221 1288 43.83% 20.85% 35.32%+0.18 +38.6 14
1989-06-11 @ Viking L 1-637.1 1288 1221 35.32% 20.85% 43.83%-0.18 -38.6 7
1989-06-18 Brann L 0-147.2 1249 1199 58.38% 20.09% 21.53%+0.90 -16.2 7
1989-06-18 @ Kongsvinger W 1-047.2 1199 1249 21.53% 20.09% 58.38%-0.90 +16.2 12
1989-06-18 Start W 3-025.8 1366 1136 73.44% 17.34% 9.22%+1.99 +8.4 17
1989-06-18 @ Lillestrom L 0-325.8 1136 1366 9.22% 17.34% 73.44%-1.99 -8.3 4
1989-06-18 Moss W 3-145.0 1195 1323 35.20% 20.85% 43.95%-0.19 +20.6 8
1989-06-18 @ Mjolner L 1-345.0 1323 1195 43.95% 20.85% 35.20%+0.19 -20.6 12
1989-06-18 Valerenga W 5-029.7 1326 1263 59.76% 19.95% 20.29%+0.98 +29.0 13
1989-06-18 @ Molde L 0-529.7 1263 1326 20.29% 19.95% 59.76%-0.98 -29.0 13
1989-06-18 Viking W 1-035.0 1384 1259 65.62% 19.14% 15.24%+1.35 +5.0 16
1989-06-18 @ Rosenborg L 0-135.0 1259 1384 15.24% 19.14% 65.62%-1.35 -5.0 14
1989-06-18 Tromso D 1-154.7 1199 1315 36.93% 20.87% 42.20%-0.11 +0.3 3
1989-06-18 @ Sogndal D 1-154.7 1315 1199 42.20% 20.87% 36.93%+0.11 -0.3 14
1989-06-25 Rosenborg D 0-051.3 1215 1390 29.24% 20.67% 50.10%-0.47 +1.5 13
1989-06-25 @ Brann D 0-051.3 1390 1215 50.10% 20.67% 29.24%+0.47 -1.5 17
1989-06-25 Kongsvinger L 0-244.6 1303 1233 60.42% 19.88% 19.71%+1.02 -31.6 12
1989-06-25 @ Moss W 2-044.6 1233 1303 19.71% 19.88% 60.42%-1.02 +31.6 10
1989-06-25 Molde L 1-244.5 1199 1355 31.56% 20.76% 47.69%-0.36 -9.1 3
1989-06-25 @ Sogndal W 2-144.5 1355 1199 47.69% 20.76% 31.56%+0.36 +9.1 16
1989-06-25 Start W 4-131.4 1314 1128 70.48% 18.14% 11.38%+1.73 +8.7 17
1989-06-25 @ Tromso L 1-431.4 1128 1314 11.38% 18.14% 70.48%-1.73 -8.7 4
1989-06-25 Mjolner W 2-033.8 1234 1216 54.75% 20.40% 24.85%+0.70 +14.8 16
1989-06-25 @ Valerenga L 0-233.8 1216 1234 24.85% 20.40% 54.75%-0.70 -14.8 8
1989-06-25 Lillestrom L 0-141.7 1254 1375 36.30% 20.87% 42.83%-0.14 -10.8 14
1989-06-25 @ Viking W 1-041.7 1375 1254 42.83% 20.87% 36.30%+0.14 +10.8 20
1989-07-02 Sogndal W 3-137.1 1265 1190 60.89% 19.82% 19.29%+1.05 +10.2 13
1989-07-02 @ Kongsvinger L 1-337.1 1190 1265 19.29% 19.82% 60.89%-1.05 -10.2 3
1989-07-02 Moss W 1-035.4 1385 1271 64.65% 19.30% 16.05%+1.29 +5.3 23
1989-07-02 @ Lillestrom L 0-135.4 1271 1385 16.05% 19.30% 64.65%-1.29 -5.3 12
1989-07-02 Molde L 0-139.5 1201 1364 30.62% 20.72% 48.66%-0.40 -9.4 8
1989-07-02 @ Mjolner W 1-039.5 1364 1201 48.66% 20.72% 30.62%+0.40 +9.4 19
1989-07-02 Valerenga L 2-360.0 1388 1249 66.84% 18.92% 14.24%+1.44 -16.5 17
1989-07-02 @ Rosenborg W 3-260.0 1249 1388 14.24% 18.92% 66.84%-1.44 +16.5 19
1989-07-02 Brann W 3-035.6 1119 1217 39.50% 20.89% 39.61%+0.00 +31.7 7
1989-07-02 @ Start L 0-335.6 1217 1119 39.61% 20.89% 39.50%+0.00 -31.7 13
1989-07-02 Viking W 1-035.7 1323 1244 61.39% 19.76% 18.85%+1.08 +6.2 20
1989-07-02 @ Tromso L 0-135.7 1244 1323 18.85% 19.76% 61.39%-1.08 -6.1 14
1989-07-09 Lillestrom W 2-043.0 1185 1391 25.58% 20.45% 53.97%-0.66 +28.4 16
1989-07-09 @ Brann L 0-243.0 1391 1185 53.97% 20.45% 25.58%+0.66 -28.4 23
1989-07-09 Tromso W 3-139.6 1374 1329 57.73% 20.15% 22.11%+0.86 +11.6 22
1989-07-09 @ Molde L 1-339.6 1329 1374 22.11% 20.15% 57.73%-0.86 -11.6 20
1989-07-09 Rosenborg L 2-448.1 1266 1372 38.36% 20.88% 40.76%-0.05 -16.5 12
1989-07-09 @ Moss W 4-248.1 1372 1266 40.76% 20.88% 38.36%+0.05 +16.5 20
1989-07-09 Mjolner W 2-143.0 1180 1191 51.17% 20.62% 28.22%+0.52 +8.3 6
1989-07-09 @ Sogndal L 1-243.0 1191 1180 28.22% 20.62% 51.17%-0.52 -8.3 8
1989-07-09 Kongsvinger W 1-038.5 1265 1275 51.39% 20.60% 28.01%+0.53 +8.7 22
1989-07-09 @ Valerenga L 0-138.5 1275 1265 28.01% 20.60% 51.39%-0.53 -8.7 13
1989-07-09 Start L 1-349.8 1237 1151 62.09% 19.67% 18.23%+1.12 -28.1 14
1989-07-09 @ Viking W 3-149.8 1151 1237 18.23% 19.67% 62.09%-1.12 +28.0 10
1989-07-23 Viking W 1-037.7 1213 1209 53.09% 20.51% 26.41%+0.62 +8.3 19
1989-07-23 @ Brann L 0-137.7 1209 1213 26.41% 20.51% 53.09%-0.62 -8.3 14
1989-07-23 Tromso L 0-334.4 1183 1318 34.38% 20.84% 44.79%-0.23 -28.3 8
1989-07-23 @ Mjolner W 3-034.4 1318 1183 44.79% 20.84% 34.38%+0.23 +28.3 23
1989-07-23 Kongsvinger L 1-448.9 1385 1266 65.08% 19.23% 15.69%+1.32 -41.5 22
1989-07-23 @ Molde W 4-148.9 1266 1385 15.69% 19.23% 65.08%-1.32 +41.5 16
1989-07-23 Start D 1-154.7 1250 1179 60.51% 19.87% 19.62%+1.02 -2.7 13
1989-07-23 @ Moss D 1-154.7 1179 1250 19.62% 19.87% 60.51%-1.02 +2.7 11
1989-07-23 Rosenborg L 1-437.1 1188 1388 26.23% 20.50% 53.27%-0.63 -19.0 6
1989-07-23 @ Sogndal W 4-137.1 1388 1188 53.27% 20.50% 26.23%+0.63 +19.0 23
1989-07-23 Lillestrom L 1-247.9 1274 1362 40.80% 20.88% 38.32%+0.05 -11.2 22
1989-07-23 @ Valerenga W 2-147.9 1362 1274 38.32% 20.88% 40.80%-0.05 +11.2 26
1989-07-30 Mjolner L 1-351.4 1308 1155 67.91% 18.71% 13.37%+1.52 -30.5 16
1989-07-30 @ Kongsvinger W 3-151.4 1155 1308 13.37% 18.71% 67.91%-1.52 +30.5 11
1989-07-30 Sogndal W 2-137.2 1373 1169 71.74% 17.82% 10.44%+1.84 +3.3 29
1989-07-30 @ Lillestrom L 1-237.2 1169 1373 10.44% 17.82% 71.74%-1.84 -3.3 6
1989-07-30 Molde D 1-157.1 1407 1344 59.77% 19.95% 20.28%+0.98 -2.6 24
1989-07-30 @ Rosenborg D 1-157.1 1344 1407 20.28% 19.95% 59.77%-0.98 +2.6 23
1989-07-30 Valerenga D 2-259.6 1181 1263 41.86% 20.88% 37.26%+0.10 -0.2 12
1989-07-30 @ Start D 2-259.6 1263 1181 37.26% 20.88% 41.86%-0.10 +0.2 23
1989-07-30 Brann D 0-051.5 1346 1222 65.55% 19.15% 15.30%+1.35 -3.8 24
1989-07-30 @ Tromso D 0-051.5 1222 1346 15.30% 19.15% 65.55%-1.35 +3.8 20
1989-07-30 Moss D 2-259.7 1201 1247 46.73% 20.79% 32.48%+0.31 -0.6 15
1989-07-30 @ Viking D 2-259.7 1247 1201 32.48% 20.79% 46.73%-0.31 +0.7 14
1989-08-06 Tromso W 3-035.2 1277 1342 44.11% 20.85% 35.05%+0.20 +28.8 19
1989-08-06 @ Kongsvinger L 0-335.2 1342 1277 35.05% 20.85% 44.11%-0.20 -28.8 24
1989-08-06 Rosenborg L 0-234.1 1185 1405 24.13% 20.34% 55.53%-0.74 -14.5 11
1989-08-06 @ Mjolner W 2-034.1 1405 1185 55.53% 20.34% 24.13%+0.74 +14.5 27
1989-08-06 Lillestrom L 0-340.4 1346 1377 48.75% 20.72% 30.53%+0.41 -37.7 23
1989-08-06 @ Molde W 3-040.4 1377 1346 30.53% 20.72% 48.75%-0.41 +37.7 32
1989-08-06 Brann W 4-242.9 1247 1225 55.23% 20.36% 24.40%+0.73 +11.3 17
1989-08-06 @ Moss L 2-442.9 1225 1247 24.40% 20.36% 55.23%-0.73 -11.3 20
1989-08-06 Start D 3-363.6 1166 1181 50.69% 20.64% 28.67%+0.50 -0.9 7
1989-08-06 @ Sogndal D 3-363.6 1181 1166 28.67% 20.64% 50.69%-0.50 +0.8 13
1989-08-06 Viking L 2-357.2 1263 1200 59.65% 19.96% 20.39%+0.97 -14.8 23
1989-08-06 @ Valerenga W 3-257.2 1200 1263 20.39% 19.96% 59.65%-0.97 +14.8 18
1989-08-12 Sogndal W 2-032.5 1215 1165 58.37% 20.09% 21.53%+0.90 +13.1 21
1989-08-12 @ Viking L 0-232.5 1165 1215 21.53% 20.09% 58.37%-0.90 -13.1 7
1989-08-13 Valerenga W 2-035.7 1214 1248 48.31% 20.74% 30.96%+0.39 +17.9 23
1989-08-13 @ Brann L 0-235.7 1248 1214 30.96% 20.74% 48.31%-0.39 -17.9 23
1989-08-13 Mjolner W 1-031.9 1414 1171 74.27% 17.08% 8.64%+2.07 +2.8 35
1989-08-13 @ Lillestrom L 0-131.9 1171 1414 8.64% 17.08% 74.27%-2.07 -2.8 11
1989-08-13 Kongsvinger W 4-135.1 1419 1306 64.57% 19.31% 16.12%+1.28 +12.3 30
1989-08-13 @ Rosenborg L 1-435.1 1306 1419 16.12% 19.31% 64.57%-1.28 -12.3 19
1989-08-13 Molde D 2-259.7 1182 1309 35.46% 20.86% 43.69%-0.18 +0.4 14
1989-08-13 @ Start D 2-259.7 1309 1182 43.69% 20.86% 35.46%+0.18 -0.4 24
1989-08-13 Moss W 3-246.1 1313 1259 58.84% 20.05% 21.12%+0.92 +6.1 27
1989-08-13 @ Tromso L 2-346.1 1259 1313 21.12% 20.05% 58.84%-0.92 -6.1 17
1989-08-20 Lillestrom L 0-142.4 1294 1417 35.83% 20.86% 43.31%-0.16 -10.7 19
1989-08-20 @ Kongsvinger W 1-042.4 1417 1294 43.31% 20.86% 35.83%+0.16 +10.7 38
1989-08-20 Start L 1-249.7 1168 1182 50.82% 20.63% 28.55%+0.50 -13.5 11
1989-08-20 @ Mjolner W 2-149.7 1182 1168 28.55% 20.63% 50.82%-0.50 +13.5 17
1989-08-20 Viking W 2-032.0 1308 1228 61.43% 19.76% 18.82%+1.08 +11.6 27
1989-08-20 @ Molde L 0-232.0 1228 1308 18.82% 19.76% 61.43%-1.08 -11.6 21
1989-08-20 Tromso W 2-141.5 1431 1319 64.44% 19.33% 16.22%+1.27 +5.0 33
1989-08-20 @ Rosenborg L 1-241.5 1319 1431 16.22% 19.33% 64.44%-1.27 -5.0 27
1989-08-20 Brann D 2-259.5 1152 1232 42.01% 20.88% 37.12%+0.10 -0.2 8
1989-08-20 @ Sogndal D 2-259.5 1232 1152 37.12% 20.88% 42.01%-0.10 +0.2 24
1989-08-20 Moss L 1-542.1 1230 1253 49.77% 20.68% 29.55%+0.45 -41.8 23
1989-08-20 @ Valerenga W 5-142.1 1253 1230 29.55% 20.68% 49.77%-0.45 +41.8 20
1989-08-27 Molde W 4-140.6 1232 1320 40.94% 20.88% 38.17%+0.06 +26.0 27
1989-08-27 @ Brann L 1-440.6 1320 1232 38.17% 20.88% 40.94%-0.06 -26.0 27
1989-08-27 Rosenborg D 0-055.6 1428 1436 51.57% 20.59% 27.83%+0.54 -1.7 39
1989-08-27 @ Lillestrom D 0-055.6 1436 1428 27.83% 20.59% 51.57%-0.54 +1.7 34
1989-08-27 Sogndal L 2-359.1 1294 1152 67.11% 18.87% 14.02%+1.46 -16.5 20
1989-08-27 @ Moss W 3-259.1 1152 1294 14.02% 18.87% 67.11%-1.46 +16.5 11
1989-08-27 Kongsvinger L 0-142.3 1196 1283 41.03% 20.88% 38.09%+0.06 -11.9 17
1989-08-27 @ Start W 1-042.3 1283 1196 38.09% 20.88% 41.03%-0.06 +11.9 22
1989-08-27 Valerenga W 4-133.0 1314 1188 65.71% 19.13% 15.17%+1.36 +11.6 30
1989-08-27 @ Tromso L 1-433.0 1188 1314 15.17% 19.13% 65.71%-1.36 -11.6 23
1989-08-27 Mjolner W 2-140.4 1217 1155 59.62% 19.97% 20.41%+0.97 +6.2 24
1989-08-27 @ Viking L 1-240.4 1155 1217 20.41% 19.97% 59.62%-0.97 -6.2 11
1989-08-30 Viking W 3-029.7 1295 1223 60.63% 19.85% 19.52%+1.03 +17.4 25
1989-08-30 @ Kongsvinger L 0-329.7 1223 1295 19.52% 19.85% 60.63%-1.03 -17.4 24
1989-08-30 Tromso W 1-037.0 1426 1326 63.39% 19.49% 17.12%+1.20 +5.6 42
1989-08-30 @ Lillestrom L 0-137.0 1326 1426 17.12% 19.49% 63.39%-1.20 -5.6 30
1989-08-30 Brann L 1-440.1 1148 1258 37.78% 20.88% 41.34%-0.08 -25.8 11
1989-08-30 @ Mjolner W 4-140.1 1258 1148 41.34% 20.88% 37.78%+0.08 +25.8 30
1989-08-30 Moss L 0-340.6 1294 1278 54.50% 20.42% 25.09%+0.69 -41.6 27
1989-08-30 @ Molde W 3-040.6 1278 1294 25.09% 20.42% 54.50%-0.69 +41.6 23
1989-08-30 Start D 2-261.6 1438 1184 74.91% 16.88% 8.21%+2.14 -3.4 35
1989-08-30 @ Rosenborg D 2-261.6 1184 1438 8.21% 16.88% 74.91%-2.14 +3.4 18
1989-08-30 Valerenga W 3-139.7 1168 1177 51.56% 20.60% 27.85%+0.54 +14.2 14
1989-08-30 @ Sogndal L 1-339.7 1177 1168 27.85% 20.60% 51.56%-0.54 -14.2 23
1989-09-10 Kongsvinger L 0-145.2 1284 1312 49.04% 20.71% 30.25%+0.42 -13.8 30
1989-09-10 @ Brann W 1-045.2 1312 1284 30.25% 20.71% 49.04%-0.42 +13.8 28
1989-09-10 Mjolner W 2-028.8 1320 1123 71.22% 17.96% 10.82%+1.79 +6.8 26
1989-09-10 @ Moss L 0-228.8 1123 1320 10.82% 17.96% 71.22%-1.79 -6.8 11
1989-09-10 Lillestrom D 1-155.5 1187 1432 21.56% 20.10% 58.35%-0.90 +2.4 19
1989-09-10 @ Start D 1-155.5 1432 1187 58.35% 20.10% 21.56%+0.90 -2.4 43
1989-09-10 Sogndal W 3-027.8 1320 1182 66.71% 18.95% 14.34%+1.43 +13.0 33
1989-09-10 @ Tromso L 0-327.8 1182 1320 14.34% 18.95% 66.71%-1.43 -13.0 14
1989-09-10 Molde L 1-246.8 1163 1252 40.66% 20.88% 38.46%+0.05 -11.1 23
1989-09-10 @ Valerenga W 2-146.8 1252 1163 38.46% 20.88% 40.66%-0.05 +11.1 30
1989-09-10 Rosenborg W 4-360.4 1206 1435 23.10% 20.25% 56.65%-0.80 +13.8 27
1989-09-10 @ Viking L 3-460.4 1435 1206 56.65% 20.25% 23.10%+0.80 -13.8 35
1989-09-23 Brann W 4-027.9 1421 1270 67.76% 18.75% 13.50%+1.51 +16.0 38
1989-09-23 @ Rosenborg L 0-427.9 1270 1421 13.50% 18.75% 67.76%-1.51 -16.0 30
1989-09-24 Moss W 4-137.8 1326 1326 52.56% 20.54% 26.90%+0.59 +19.5 31
1989-09-24 @ Kongsvinger L 1-437.8 1326 1326 26.90% 20.54% 52.56%-0.59 -19.4 26
1989-09-24 Viking W 2-137.8 1430 1219 72.13% 17.71% 10.15%+1.87 +3.2 46
1989-09-24 @ Lillestrom L 1-237.8 1219 1430 10.15% 17.71% 72.13%-1.87 -3.2 27
1989-09-24 Valerenga W 2-035.5 1116 1151 48.10% 20.75% 31.16%+0.38 +18.0 14
1989-09-24 @ Mjolner L 0-235.5 1151 1116 31.16% 20.75% 48.10%-0.38 -18.0 23
1989-09-24 Sogndal W 4-240.5 1263 1169 62.78% 19.58% 17.64%+1.16 +8.4 33
1989-09-24 @ Molde L 2-440.5 1169 1263 17.64% 19.58% 62.78%-1.16 -8.4 14
1989-09-24 Tromso L 1-341.8 1190 1333 33.15% 20.81% 46.04%-0.28 -16.4 19
1989-09-24 @ Start W 3-141.8 1333 1190 46.04% 20.81% 33.15%+0.28 +16.4 36
1989-10-01 Start L 0-148.0 1254 1173 61.50% 19.75% 18.75%+1.08 -17.0 30
1989-10-01 @ Brann W 1-048.0 1173 1254 18.75% 19.75% 61.50%-1.08 +17.0 22
1989-10-01 Mjolner W 7-028.4 1272 1134 66.70% 18.95% 14.35%+1.43 +28.8 36
1989-10-01 @ Molde L 0-728.4 1134 1272 14.35% 18.95% 66.70%-1.43 -28.8 14
1989-10-01 Lillestrom L 2-352.4 1307 1433 35.54% 20.86% 43.60%-0.17 -9.5 26
1989-10-01 @ Moss W 3-252.4 1433 1307 43.60% 20.86% 35.54%+0.17 +9.5 49
1989-10-01 Kongsvinger W 2-150.2 1161 1345 28.02% 20.60% 51.38%-0.53 +13.6 17
1989-10-01 @ Sogndal L 1-250.2 1345 1161 51.38% 20.60% 28.02%+0.53 -13.6 31
1989-10-01 Rosenborg L 2-832.0 1133 1437 16.44% 19.37% 64.18%-1.25 -19.4 23
1989-10-01 @ Valerenga W 8-232.0 1437 1133 64.18% 19.37% 16.44%+1.25 +19.4 41
1989-10-01 Tromso W 4-249.5 1216 1350 34.47% 20.84% 44.69%-0.22 +18.7 30
1989-10-01 @ Viking L 2-449.5 1350 1216 44.69% 20.84% 34.47%+0.22 -18.7 36
1989-10-08 Valerenga W 5-025.2 1332 1114 72.64% 17.57% 9.79%+1.92 +14.3 34
1989-10-08 @ Kongsvinger L 0-525.2 1114 1332 9.79% 17.57% 72.64%-1.92 -14.3 23
1989-10-08 Brann W 1-033.5 1442 1237 71.79% 17.81% 10.40%+1.84 +3.4 52
1989-10-08 @ Lillestrom L 0-133.5 1237 1442 10.40% 17.81% 71.79%-1.84 -3.5 30
1989-10-08 Sogndal D 3-363.5 1105 1175 43.49% 20.86% 35.65%+0.17 -0.3 15
1989-10-08 @ Mjolner D 3-363.5 1175 1105 35.65% 20.86% 43.49%-0.17 +0.3 18
1989-10-08 Moss W 2-032.1 1456 1297 68.39% 18.61% 12.99%+1.56 +8.1 44
1989-10-08 @ Rosenborg L 0-232.1 1297 1456 12.99% 18.61% 68.39%-1.56 -8.1 26
1989-10-08 Viking D 1-154.5 1190 1235 46.92% 20.78% 32.29%+0.32 -0.9 23
1989-10-08 @ Start D 1-154.5 1235 1190 32.29% 20.78% 46.92%-0.32 +0.9 31
1989-10-08 Molde D 0-051.6 1331 1300 56.21% 20.29% 23.51%+0.78 -2.3 37
1989-10-08 @ Tromso D 0-051.6 1300 1331 23.51% 20.29% 56.21%-0.78 +2.3 37

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1989-07-30 13.37% Mjolner 1155 3 @ Kongsvinger 1308 1
2 1989-08-27 14.02% Sogndal 1152 3 @ Moss 1294 2
3 1989-07-02 14.24% Valerenga 1249 3 @ Rosenborg 1388 2
4 1989-07-23 15.69% Kongsvinger 1266 4 @ Molde 1385 1
5 1989-07-09 18.23% Start 1151 3 @ Viking 1237 1
6 1989-10-01 18.75% Start 1173 1 @ Brann 1254 0
7 1989-06-25 19.71% Kongsvinger 1233 2 @ Moss 1303 0
8 1989-08-06 20.39% Viking 1200 3 @ Valerenga 1263 2
9 1989-06-18 21.53% Brann 1199 1 @ Kongsvinger 1249 0
10 1989-09-10 23.10% @ Viking 1206 4 Rosenborg 1435 3
11 1989-08-30 25.09% Moss 1278 3 @ Molde 1294 0
12 1989-07-09 25.58% @ Brann 1185 2 Lillestrom 1391 0
13 1989-10-01 28.02% @ Sogndal 1161 2 Kongsvinger 1345 1
14 1989-08-20 28.55% Start 1182 2 @ Mjolner 1168 1
15 1989-08-20 29.55% Moss 1253 5 @ Valerenga 1230 1
16 1989-05-16 30.05% @ Brann 1169 2 Moss 1337 0
17 1989-09-10 30.25% Kongsvinger 1312 1 @ Brann 1284 0
18 1989-08-06 30.53% Lillestrom 1377 3 @ Molde 1346 0
19 1989-05-28 31.47% Mjolner 1197 2 @ Start 1159 1
20 1989-05-28 32.21% @ Viking 1194 2 Molde 1345 0
21 1989-10-01 34.47% @ Viking 1216 4 Tromso 1350 2
22 1989-06-18 35.20% @ Mjolner 1195 3 Moss 1323 1
23 1989-08-27 38.09% Kongsvinger 1283 1 @ Start 1196 0
24 1989-07-23 38.32% Lillestrom 1362 2 @ Valerenga 1274 1
25 1989-09-10 38.46% Molde 1252 2 @ Valerenga 1163 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1989-08-20 41.78 Moss 5 1253 29.55% @ Valerenga 1 1230 49.77% 20.68%
2 1989-08-30 41.63 Moss 3 1278 25.09% @ Molde 0 1294 54.50% 20.42%
3 1989-07-23 41.47 Kongsvinger 4 1266 15.69% @ Molde 1 1385 65.08% 19.23%
4 1989-06-11 38.58 @ Viking 6 1221 43.83% Kongsvinger 1 1288 35.32% 20.85%
5 1989-08-06 37.69 Lillestrom 3 1377 30.53% @ Molde 0 1346 48.75% 20.72%
6 1989-05-07 32.26 Tromso 3 1292 38.64% @ Brann 0 1201 40.47% 20.89%
7 1989-07-02 31.71 @ Start 3 1119 39.50% Brann 0 1217 39.61% 20.89%
8 1989-06-25 31.56 Kongsvinger 2 1233 19.71% @ Moss 0 1303 60.42% 19.88%
9 1989-07-30 30.53 Mjolner 3 1155 13.37% @ Kongsvinger 1 1308 67.91% 18.71%
10 1989-06-18 28.98 @ Molde 5 1326 59.76% Valerenga 0 1263 20.29% 19.95%
11 1989-10-01 28.81 @ Molde 7 1272 66.70% Mjolner 0 1134 14.35% 18.95%
12 1989-08-06 28.76 @ Kongsvinger 3 1277 44.11% Tromso 0 1342 35.05% 20.85%
13 1989-07-09 28.42 @ Brann 2 1185 25.58% Lillestrom 0 1391 53.97% 20.45%
14 1989-07-23 28.31 Tromso 3 1318 44.79% @ Mjolner 0 1183 34.38% 20.84%
15 1989-07-09 28.05 Start 3 1151 18.23% @ Viking 1 1237 62.09% 19.67%
16 1989-05-16 26.18 @ Brann 2 1169 30.05% Moss 0 1337 49.25% 20.70%
17 1989-08-27 25.98 @ Brann 4 1232 40.94% Molde 1 1320 38.17% 20.88%
18 1989-08-30 25.76 Brann 4 1258 41.34% @ Mjolner 1 1148 37.78% 20.88%
19 1989-05-28 25.15 @ Viking 2 1194 32.21% Molde 0 1345 47.01% 20.78%
20 1989-06-18 20.57 @ Mjolner 3 1195 35.20% Moss 1 1323 43.95% 20.85%
21 1989-05-28 19.47 @ Tromso 2 1315 44.85% Rosenborg 0 1374 34.32% 20.83%
22 1989-09-24 19.45 @ Kongsvinger 4 1326 52.56% Moss 1 1326 26.90% 20.54%
23 1989-10-01 19.35 Rosenborg 8 1437 64.18% @ Valerenga 2 1133 16.44% 19.37%
24 1989-07-23 19.04 Rosenborg 4 1388 53.27% @ Sogndal 1 1188 26.23% 20.50%
25 1989-06-04 18.86 @ Valerenga 3 1238 39.64% Tromso 1 1334 39.47% 20.89%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1989-08-06 63.6 @ Sogndal 3 1166 50.69% Start 3 1181 28.67% 20.64%
2 1989-10-08 63.5 @ Mjolner 3 1105 43.49% Sogndal 3 1175 35.65% 20.86%
3 1989-08-30 61.6 @ Rosenborg 2 1438 74.91% Start 2 1184 8.21% 16.88%
4 1989-05-25 60.8 @ Kongsvinger 2 1289 41.21% Rosenborg 2 1374 37.91% 20.88%
5 1989-05-28 60.4 @ Moss 2 1328 62.63% Valerenga 2 1235 17.77% 19.60%
6 1989-09-10 60.4 @ Viking 4 1206 23.10% Rosenborg 3 1435 56.65% 20.25%
7 1989-07-02 60.0 Valerenga 3 1249 14.24% @ Rosenborg 2 1388 66.84% 18.92%
8 1989-05-25 59.7 @ Sogndal 2 1216 55.32% Viking 2 1193 24.33% 20.36%
9 1989-07-30 59.7 @ Viking 2 1201 46.73% Moss 2 1247 32.48% 20.79%
10 1989-08-13 59.7 @ Start 2 1182 35.46% Molde 2 1309 43.69% 20.86%
11 1989-07-30 59.6 @ Start 2 1181 41.86% Valerenga 2 1263 37.26% 20.88%
12 1989-08-20 59.5 @ Sogndal 2 1152 42.01% Brann 2 1232 37.12% 20.88%
13 1989-08-27 59.1 Sogndal 3 1152 14.02% @ Moss 2 1294 67.11% 18.87%
14 1989-08-06 57.2 Viking 3 1200 20.39% @ Valerenga 2 1263 59.65% 19.96%
15 1989-07-30 57.1 @ Rosenborg 1 1407 59.77% Molde 1 1344 20.28% 19.95%
16 1989-06-11 55.9 @ Tromso 1 1315 46.16% Lillestrom 1 1365 33.03% 20.80%
17 1989-06-11 55.6 @ Moss 1 1325 52.68% Molde 1 1324 26.78% 20.53%
18 1989-08-27 55.6 @ Lillestrom 0 1428 51.57% Rosenborg 0 1436 27.83% 20.59%
19 1989-09-10 55.5 @ Start 1 1187 21.56% Lillestrom 1 1432 58.35% 20.10%
20 1989-05-07 54.7 @ Mjolner 1 1228 43.81% Kongsvinger 1 1296 35.34% 20.85%
21 1989-06-18 54.7 @ Sogndal 1 1199 36.93% Tromso 1 1315 42.20% 20.87%
22 1989-07-23 54.7 @ Moss 1 1250 60.51% Start 1 1179 19.62% 19.87%
23 1989-06-04 54.5 @ Mjolner 1 1210 51.45% Viking 1 1219 27.95% 20.60%
24 1989-10-08 54.5 @ Start 1 1190 46.92% Viking 1 1235 32.29% 20.78%
25 1989-10-01 52.4 Lillestrom 3 1433 43.60% @ Moss 2 1307 35.54% 20.86%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1989-10-08 25.2 @ Kongsvinger 5 1332 72.64% Valerenga 0 1114 9.79% 17.57%
2 1989-06-18 25.8 @ Lillestrom 3 1366 73.44% Start 0 1136 9.22% 17.34%
3 1989-09-10 27.8 @ Tromso 3 1320 66.71% Sogndal 0 1182 14.34% 18.95%
4 1989-09-23 27.9 @ Rosenborg 4 1421 67.76% Brann 0 1270 13.50% 18.75%
5 1989-10-01 28.4 @ Molde 7 1272 66.70% Mjolner 0 1134 14.35% 18.95%
6 1989-09-10 28.8 @ Moss 2 1320 71.22% Mjolner 0 1123 10.82% 17.96%
7 1989-06-18 29.7 @ Molde 5 1326 59.76% Valerenga 0 1263 20.29% 19.95%
8 1989-08-30 29.7 @ Kongsvinger 3 1295 60.63% Viking 0 1223 19.52% 19.85%
9 1989-05-07 30.4 @ Moss 2 1328 66.54% Viking 0 1192 14.48% 18.98%
10 1989-06-25 31.4 @ Tromso 4 1314 70.48% Start 1 1128 11.38% 18.14%
11 1989-08-13 31.9 @ Lillestrom 1 1414 74.27% Mjolner 0 1171 8.64% 17.08%
12 1989-08-20 32.0 @ Molde 2 1308 61.43% Viking 0 1228 18.82% 19.76%
13 1989-10-01 32.0 Rosenborg 8 1437 64.18% @ Valerenga 2 1133 16.44% 19.37%
14 1989-10-08 32.1 @ Rosenborg 2 1456 68.39% Moss 0 1297 12.99% 18.61%
15 1989-05-07 32.5 @ Valerenga 2 1218 58.66% Start 0 1165 21.27% 20.07%
16 1989-08-12 32.5 @ Viking 2 1215 58.37% Sogndal 0 1165 21.53% 20.09%
17 1989-08-27 33.0 @ Tromso 4 1314 65.71% Valerenga 1 1188 15.17% 19.13%
18 1989-04-30 33.4 @ Tromso 2 1278 56.81% Mjolner 0 1242 22.96% 20.24%
19 1989-05-25 33.4 @ Valerenga 2 1221 55.66% Brann 0 1195 24.01% 20.33%
20 1989-10-08 33.5 @ Lillestrom 1 1442 71.79% Brann 0 1237 10.40% 17.81%
21 1989-05-16 33.6 @ Rosenborg 6 1362 66.39% Mjolner 2 1228 14.61% 19.01%
22 1989-06-11 33.7 Rosenborg 2 1370 55.58% @ Start 0 1151 24.09% 20.34%
23 1989-06-25 33.8 @ Valerenga 2 1234 54.75% Mjolner 0 1216 24.85% 20.40%
24 1989-08-06 34.1 Rosenborg 2 1405 55.53% @ Mjolner 0 1185 24.13% 20.34%
25 1989-07-23 34.4 Tromso 3 1318 44.79% @ Mjolner 0 1183 34.38% 20.84%