1995 Tippeligaen Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

62 points · 10th Title

Last Title: 1994

Relegated

Strindheim

17 pts

Hamarkameratene · 27 pts

Hodd · 28 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Molde

14.94 points above expected

47 points · 32.06 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Viking

8.54 points below expected

40 points · 48.54 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Rosenborg Champion	26	19	5	2	62	78	29	+49	56.20	+5.80
2	Molde	26	14	5	7	47	60	47	+13	32.06	+14.94
3	Bodo Glimt	26	12	7	7	43	65	43	+22	36.96	+6.04
4	Lillestrom	26	11	8	7	41	50	36	+14	48.87	-7.87
5	Viking	26	12	4	10	40	55	42	+13	48.54	-8.54
6	Valerenga	26	11	6	9	39	47	44	+3	32.15	+6.85
7	Tromso	26	11	5	10	38	53	42	+11	40.63	-2.63
8	Start	26	11	1	14	34	51	52	-1	41.99	-7.99
9	Stabaek	26	9	6	11	33	36	40	-4	28.07	+4.93
10	Brann	26	9	5	12	32	40	50	-10	31.03	+0.97
11	Kongsvinger	26	7	8	11	29	37	54	-17	35.52	-6.52
12	Hodd Relegated	26	8	4	14	28	38	57	-19	26.68	+1.32
13	Hamarkameratene Relegated	26	8	3	15	27	33	66	-33	30.24	-3.24
14	Strindheim Relegated	26	4	5	17	17	36	77	-41	19.76	-2.76

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Molde	47	32.06	+14.94
2	Valerenga	39	32.15	+6.85
3	Bodo Glimt	43	36.96	+6.04
4	Rosenborg	62	56.20	+5.80
5	Stabaek	33	28.07	+4.93

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Viking	40	48.54	-8.54
2	Start	34	41.99	-7.99
3	Lillestrom	41	48.87	-7.87
4	Kongsvinger	29	35.52	-6.52
5	Hamarkameratene	27	30.24	-3.24

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Molde	6	Apr 22 – May 16	1 in 2,072
2	Strindheim	2	Sep 2 – Sep 8	1 in 79
3	Rosenborg	8	May 7 – Jun 18	1 in 56
4	Brann	3	Aug 27 – Sep 9	1 in 50
5	Bodo Glimt	4	Jul 30 – Aug 26	1 in 36

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Start	4	Aug 20 – Sep 10	1 in 315
2	Hamarkameratene	6	May 6 – Jun 2	1 in 122
3	Viking	2	Aug 18 – Aug 27	1 in 41
4	Tromso	3	May 3 – May 14	1 in 29
5	Lillestrom	3	Sep 2 – Sep 23	1 in 25

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Molde	7	Apr 22 – May 21	1 in 157
2	Strindheim	3	Aug 27 – Sep 8	1 in 45
3	Valerenga	6	Aug 6 – Sep 24	1 in 36
4	Stabaek	4	Sep 10 – Oct 8	1 in 33
5	Bodo Glimt	8	Jul 30 – Oct 1	1 in 31

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Lillestrom	5	Aug 20 – Sep 23	1 in 74
2	Start	4	Aug 20 – Sep 10	1 in 26
3	Hamarkameratene	8	May 3 – Jun 11	1 in 22
4	Strindheim	13	May 7 – Jul 30	1 in 18
5	Tromso	5	May 21 – Jun 14	1 in 9

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team	Elo	Season Pts	Elo Δ (5)	Points (5)	Expected (5)	Actual − Exp
Rosenborg	1841	62	+4	11	11.4	-0.4
Molde	1559	47	-9	4	5.1	-1.1
Bodo Glimt	1720	43	+41	10	9.1	+0.9
Lillestrom	1698	41	-1	7	7.7	-0.7
Viking	1674	40	-19	5	7.7	-2.7
Valerenga	1603	39	+1	7	8.8	-1.8
Tromso	1674	38	+13	12	9.4	+2.6
Start	1635	34	+6	9	8.1	+0.9
Stabaek	1541	33	+13	8	5.5	+2.5
Brann	1552	32	-6	5	6.2	-1.2
Kongsvinger	1537	29	-8	3	5.1	-2.1
Hodd	1503	28	+12	6	4.8	+1.2
Hamarkameratene	1504	27	-21	6	4.5	+1.5
Strindheim	1384	17	-35	1	3.7	-2.7

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Team	BG	BRA	HAM	HOD	KON	LIL	MOL	ROS	STA	STA	STR	TRO	VAL	VIK
Bodo Glimt	—	1-0-1 3.65	2-0-0 3.18	1-1-0 3.62	1-1-0 2.80	0-2-0 2.22	2-0-0 2.85	0-1-1 1.40	0-0-2 3.69	1-0-1 2.20	1-1-0 4.18	1-0-1 2.46	1-1-0 2.88	1-0-1 2.53
Brann	1-0-1 1.95	—	2-0-0 2.60	0-0-2 3.01	0-1-1 2.67	1-1-0 1.63	0-0-2 3.28	0-1-1 1.19	1-0-1 2.98	0-0-2 1.79	1-1-0 3.71	1-1-0 2.16	1-0-1 2.46	1-0-1 1.77
Hamarkameratene	0-0-2 2.40	0-0-2 2.99	—	1-0-1 2.97	1-0-1 2.54	0-1-1 1.42	0-0-2 2.75	0-0-2 1.14	1-0-1 2.92	1-1-0 1.99	1-1-0 3.82	0-0-2 2.24	2-0-0 2.29	1-0-1 1.52
Hodd	0-1-1 1.99	2-0-0 2.57	1-0-1 2.61	—	1-0-1 2.14	0-0-2 1.41	0-1-1 2.32	0-0-2 0.98	0-1-1 2.91	2-0-0 1.57	1-1-0 3.19	0-0-2 1.60	1-0-1 1.84	0-0-2 1.33
Kongsvinger	0-1-1 2.78	1-1-0 2.92	1-0-1 3.05	1-0-1 3.45	—	0-0-2 1.97	0-0-2 3.06	0-1-1 1.35	0-2-0 3.24	1-0-1 2.19	2-0-0 4.20	0-1-1 2.60	1-1-0 2.84	0-1-1 1.89
Lillestrom	0-2-0 3.37	0-1-1 3.98	1-1-0 4.21	2-0-0 4.22	2-0-0 3.64	—	1-0-1 3.94	0-0-2 2.06	1-1-0 4.25	1-0-1 3.09	1-1-0 4.75	1-1-0 3.58	0-1-1 4.03	1-0-1 2.88
Molde	0-0-2 2.73	2-0-0 2.32	2-0-0 2.84	1-1-0 3.26	2-0-0 2.53	1-0-1 1.67	—	0-1-1 1.20	1-0-1 3.07	2-0-0 2.01	2-0-0 4.07	0-1-1 2.50	0-1-1 2.93	1-1-0 1.62
Rosenborg	1-1-0 4.23	1-1-0 4.46	2-0-0 4.52	2-0-0 4.70	1-1-0 4.28	2-0-0 3.54	1-1-0 4.45	—	1-0-1 4.70	2-0-0 3.86	2-0-0 4.88	2-0-0 4.19	1-0-1 4.48	1-1-0 3.65
Stabaek	2-0-0 1.92	1-0-1 2.60	1-0-1 2.66	1-1-0 2.67	0-2-0 2.35	0-1-1 1.39	1-0-1 2.52	1-0-1 0.97	—	0-0-2 1.95	1-0-1 3.65	0-1-1 2.04	0-1-1 2.17	1-0-1 1.47
Start	1-0-1 3.39	2-0-0 3.82	0-1-1 3.61	0-0-2 4.05	1-0-1 3.41	1-0-1 2.49	0-0-2 3.59	0-0-2 1.75	2-0-0 3.67	—	1-0-1 4.49	2-0-0 2.86	0-0-2 3.39	1-0-1 2.29
Strindheim	0-1-1 1.45	0-1-1 1.89	0-1-1 1.78	0-1-1 2.40	0-0-2 1.43	0-1-1 0.93	0-0-2 1.56	0-0-2 0.83	1-0-1 1.95	1-0-1 1.16	—	1-0-1 1.34	0-0-2 1.66	1-0-1 1.05
Tromso	1-0-1 3.12	0-1-1 3.44	2-0-0 3.37	2-0-0 4.02	1-1-0 2.98	0-1-1 2.02	1-1-0 3.09	0-0-2 1.44	1-1-0 3.56	0-0-2 2.72	1-0-1 4.30	—	1-0-1 3.16	1-0-1 1.90
Valerenga	0-1-1 2.71	1-0-1 3.12	0-0-2 3.29	1-0-1 3.77	0-1-1 2.74	1-1-0 1.59	1-1-0 2.65	1-0-1 1.17	1-1-0 3.42	2-0-0 2.20	2-0-0 3.95	1-0-1 2.42	—	0-1-1 1.72
Viking	1-0-1 3.07	1-0-1 3.83	1-0-1 4.11	2-0-0 4.31	1-1-0 3.71	1-0-1 2.70	0-1-1 3.99	0-1-1 1.94	1-0-1 4.15	1-0-1 3.30	1-0-1 4.62	1-0-1 3.70	1-1-0 3.89	—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.83	+7.5
Allowed	0.74	-7.4
Differential	0.93	+4.4

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	4.40%	4.67%	3.85%	1.92%	1.37%	3.30%	19.51%
1	4.67%	6.04%	7.69%	6.59%	3.57%	1.10%	29.67%
2	3.85%	7.69%	8.24%	1.65%	1.10%	1.92%	24.45%
3	1.92%	6.59%	1.65%	1.10%	0.27%	0.27%	11.81%
4	1.37%	3.57%	1.10%	0.27%	—	0.82%	7.14%
5+	3.30%	1.10%	1.92%	0.27%	0.82%	—	7.42%
Total	19.51%	29.67%	24.45%	11.81%	7.14%	7.42%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.87	1.87	+0.00
SD	1.65	1.65	2.54
CV	0.88	0.88	—
Max	9	9	+8
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	15.38%
1	—	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	—	19.23%
2	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
3	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	23.08%
4	11.54%	—	—	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
Total	26.92%	19.23%	34.62%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.50	1.65	+0.85
SD	1.82	1.50	2.77
CV	0.73	0.90	—
Max	6	6	+6
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	26.92%
1	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	30.77%
2	—	7.69%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	19.23%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	3.85%	46.15%	23.08%	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.54	1.92	-0.38
SD	1.39	1.32	2.17
CV	0.90	0.69	—
Max	4	6	+3
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	11.54%	26.92%
1	3.85%	—	3.85%	11.54%	15.38%	3.85%	38.46%
2	3.85%	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	26.92%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	19.23%	19.23%	15.38%	15.38%	15.38%	15.38%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.27	2.54	-1.27
SD	1.22	2.20	2.84
CV	0.96	0.86	—
Max	5	9	+5
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	23.08%
1	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	34.62%
2	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	26.92%
3	7.69%	—	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	19.23%	30.77%	11.54%	15.38%	11.54%	11.54%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.46	2.19	-0.73
SD	1.27	2.00	2.65
CV	0.87	0.91	—
Max	5	7	+4
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	7.69%	26.92%
1	3.85%	11.54%	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	34.62%
2	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	19.23%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	19.23%	30.77%	19.23%	15.38%	3.85%	11.54%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.42	2.08	-0.65
SD	1.33	2.04	2.62
CV	0.94	0.98	—
Max	5	8	+4
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
1	3.85%	11.54%	7.69%	15.38%	—	—	38.46%
2	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	19.23%
3	3.85%	11.54%	—	3.85%	—	—	19.23%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%	—	7.69%
Total	26.92%	34.62%	15.38%	19.23%	3.85%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.92	1.38	+0.54
SD	1.49	1.20	1.88
CV	0.78	0.87	—
Max	6	4	+6
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	15.38%
1	7.69%	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	15.38%
2	3.85%	7.69%	19.23%	3.85%	—	—	34.62%
3	—	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	15.38%
4	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	11.54%
Total	15.38%	26.92%	38.46%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.31	1.81	+0.50
SD	1.78	1.47	2.52
CV	0.77	0.81	—
Max	7	7	+6
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
1	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	19.23%
2	7.69%	15.38%	7.69%	—	—	—	30.77%
3	—	15.38%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	19.23%
Total	19.23%	53.85%	23.08%	3.85%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	3.00	1.12	+1.88
SD	1.92	0.77	2.16
CV	0.64	0.69	—
Max	9	3	+8
Min	1	0	-1

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	7.69%	15.38%	—	—	3.85%	34.62%
1	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	19.23%
2	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	3.85%	23.08%
3	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	—	—	19.23%
4	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	26.92%	26.92%	30.77%	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.38	1.54	-0.15
SD	1.27	1.45	2.17
CV	0.92	0.94	—
Max	4	5	+4
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	11.54%	—	—	—	19.23%
1	3.85%	—	11.54%	11.54%	7.69%	—	34.62%
2	—	11.54%	—	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
3	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
5+	—	—	7.69%	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	11.54%	30.77%	30.77%	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.96	2.00	-0.04
SD	1.78	1.50	2.34
CV	0.91	0.75	—
Max	6	6	+4
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	—	7.69%	—	3.85%	19.23%
1	3.85%	11.54%	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	7.69%	50.00%
2	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	23.08%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	7.69%
Total	7.69%	19.23%	15.38%	23.08%	15.38%	19.23%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.38	2.96	-1.58
SD	1.39	2.03	2.19
CV	1.00	0.69	—
Max	6	9	+2
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
1	11.54%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	34.62%
2	3.85%	7.69%	11.54%	—	3.85%	—	26.92%
3	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	11.54%
5+	7.69%	—	—	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	26.92%	23.08%	30.77%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.04	1.62	+0.42
SD	1.99	1.44	2.67
CV	0.98	0.89	—
Max	8	5	+8
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	19.23%
1	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	26.92%
2	3.85%	11.54%	15.38%	3.85%	—	—	34.62%
3	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	15.38%	30.77%	34.62%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.81	1.69	+0.12
SD	1.81	1.23	2.32
CV	1.00	0.72	—
Max	9	5	+7
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	—	19.23%
1	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	19.23%
2	11.54%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	26.92%
3	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	15.38%
4	—	—	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	7.69%
5+	11.54%	—	—	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	34.62%	23.08%	19.23%	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.12	1.62	+0.50
SD	1.68	1.77	2.50
CV	0.79	1.09	—
Max	6	6	+6
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Rosenborg	1841	62	56.20	+5.80	82.0%	44	47	51	56	61	66	68
Bodo Glimt	1720	43	36.96	+6.04	83.0%	19	25	33	37	41	48	52
Lillestrom	1698	41	48.87	-7.87	10.0%	28	38	45	48	54	58	60
Viking	1674	40	48.54	-8.54	11.0%	34	38	44	49	52	59	61
Tromso	1674	38	40.63	-2.63	38.0%	20	29	36	41	45	51	54
Start	1635	34	41.99	-7.99	13.0%	26	31	38	42	46	54	57
Valerenga	1603	39	32.15	+6.85	83.0%	14	23	28	33	36	41	45
Molde	1559	47	32.06	+14.94	100.0%	13	22	28	31	37	42	46
Brann	1552	32	31.03	+0.97	59.0%	15	21	27	31	35	39	51
Stabaek	1541	33	28.07	+4.93	79.0%	12	18	24	28	32	38	44
Kongsvinger	1537	29	35.52	-6.52	14.0%	23	28	31	35	39	45	50
Hamarkameratene	1504	27	30.24	-3.24	29.0%	14	20	27	30	34	39	49
Hodd	1503	28	26.68	+1.32	64.0%	12	17	22	26	31	37	43
Strindheim	1384	17	19.76	-2.76	33.0%	9	11	16	20	23	30	37

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 14.5% * Slight Edge: 14.5% to 17.5% * Clear Edge: 17.5% to 23% * Strong Edge: 23% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+17.58%

Clear Edge

48.90%19.78%31.32%

Elo Value

Home Edge

175 Elo

0.006 goals per Elo point

061.73500

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.49 goals

Neutral

-2+0.35+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin: Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.09 * Tight Race: 0.09 to 0.21 * Comfortable: 0.21 to 0.29 * Runaway: 0.29 and up.

Title-Race Openness

2.2

One-Team Race

134610

Champion Preseason Odds

64%

Rosenborg, 1st of 14

LongshotFavorite

Title Margin

Expected

0.58/gm

Runaway

00.240.8/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 4.93 * Some Luck: 4.93 to 7.39 * Lucky: 7.39 to 9.86 * Wild Swing: 9.86 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.4 * Close: 1.4 to 2.11 * Off: 2.11 to 2.81 * Way Off: 2.81 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.
Unexpected Relegations: Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 1.07 * A Surprise: 1.07 to 1.71 * Several Surprises: 1.71 to 2.35 * Many Surprises: 2.35 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

6.60 points

Some Luck

06.1615

Average Finish Error

Expected

2.29

Off

01.764

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 96.43%

100.00%

Molde

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 3.57%

10.00%

Lillestrom

050

Season Outliers

Expected

1 of 14

Minimal Outliers

01.47

Unexpected Relegations

Expected

1 of 3

As Expected

01.13

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.14 * Even: 0.14 to 0.16 * Top-Heavy: 0.16 to 0.19 * Lopsided: 0.19 and up.
Noll-Scully: Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.55 * Strong Separation: 1.55 to 1.75 * Wide Separation: 1.75 and up.
Interquartile Edge: Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 61.5% * Slight Edge: 61.5% to 65% * Clear Edge: 65% to 69.5% * Wide Edge: 69.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst: Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82% * Clear Edge: 82% to 87.5% * Strong Edge: 87.5% to 92.5% * Dominant: 92.5% and up.
Close Games: Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 53.5% * Some Drama: 53.5% to 58% * Frequent: 58% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts: Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16% * Occasional: 16% to 19% * Frequent: 19% to 25% * Very Frequent: 25% and up.

Gini Index

0.15

Even

00.140.5

Noll-Scully

Elo SD: 114.74

1.54

Moderate Separation

0.91.351.551.752.5

Interquartile Edge

69%

Clear Edge

50%61.5%69.5%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline

93%

Dominant

50%92%100%

Close Games

Expected

49%

Few

0%44%100%

Blowouts

Expected

26%

Very Frequent

0%33%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.32 * Slight Separation: 0.32 to 0.34 * Notable Separation: 0.34 to 0.38 * Lopsided: 0.38 and up.
Strangeness: How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.28 * Some Carryover: 0.28 to 0.48 * Strong Carryover: 0.48 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23.5% * As Expected: 23.5% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 27.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 27.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19% * As Expected: 19% to 22% * Shaky Favorites: 22% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.60

Predictable

00.572

Matchup Imbalance

0.38

Lopsided

00.320.380.5

Strangeness

Expected

1.12

Wilder Than Modeled

01.002

Repeatability

0.38

Some Carryover

00.280.481

Upset Rate

Expected

27%

Upset-Prone

0%25%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

25%

Shaky Favorites

0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.18 * Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.23 * Well Above Noise: 0.23 and up.

Probability calibration

0.58

Excellent

0.010.050.10.51

Calibration slope

Ideal

0.63

Overconfident

0.51.001.5

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.089

Well Within Noise

00.1170.3

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Rosenborg	64.00%	23.00%	7.00%	5.00%	1.00%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Molde	—	—	1.00%	5.00%	7.00%	12.00%	8.00%	11.00%	13.00%	10.00%	15.00%	8.00%	8.00%	2.00%
Bodo Glimt	2.00%	4.00%	4.00%	9.00%	19.00%	13.00%	14.00%	10.00%	9.00%	8.00%	2.00%	2.00%	3.00%	1.00%
Lillestrom	14.00%	29.00%	30.00%	14.00%	6.00%	3.00%	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%	—	—	1.00%	—	—
Viking	15.00%	28.00%	30.00%	11.00%	10.00%	3.00%	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%	—	—	—	—	—
Valerenga	—	—	1.00%	4.00%	4.00%	10.00%	13.00%	11.00%	17.00%	9.00%	14.00%	7.00%	8.00%	2.00%
Tromso	2.00%	5.00%	14.00%	22.00%	17.00%	9.00%	9.00%	11.00%	2.00%	3.00%	3.00%	2.00%	1.00%	—
Start	3.00%	10.00%	11.00%	18.00%	18.00%	14.00%	9.00%	9.00%	4.00%	1.00%	3.00%	—	—	—
Stabaek	—	—	—	—	4.00%	2.00%	9.00%	3.00%	11.00%	15.00%	9.00%	23.00%	14.00%	10.00%
Brann	—	1.00%	—	3.00%	5.00%	9.00%	7.00%	9.00%	13.00%	13.00%	16.00%	13.00%	8.00%	3.00%
Kongsvinger	—	—	1.00%	8.00%	6.00%	18.00%	14.00%	16.00%	11.00%	16.00%	3.00%	6.00%	—	1.00%
Hodd	—	—	—	1.00%	—	3.00%	3.00%	5.00%	9.00%	10.00%	14.00%	16.00%	27.00%	12.00%
Hamarkameratene	—	—	1.00%	—	3.00%	3.00%	12.00%	13.00%	7.00%	14.00%	16.00%	15.00%	11.00%	5.00%
Strindheim	—	—	—	—	—	1.00%	—	—	2.00%	1.00%	5.00%	7.00%	20.00%	64.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team	Same level	Direct relegation
Rosenborg	100%	—
Start	100%	—
Viking	100%	—
Lillestrom	99.00%	1.00%
Tromso	97.00%	3.00%
Bodo Glimt	94.00%	6.00%
Kongsvinger	93.00%	7.00%
Valerenga	83.00%	17.00%
Molde	82.00%	18.00%
Brann	76.00%	24.00%
Hamarkameratene	69.00%	31.00%
Stabaek	53.00%	47.00%
Hodd	45.00%	55.00%
Strindheim	9.00%	91.00%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
1995-04-21	Kongsvinger	W 6-0	47.6	1746	1628	62.09%	19.17%	18.74%	+1.03	+20.4	3
1995-04-21	@ Rosenborg	L 0-6	47.6	1628	1746	18.74%	19.17%	62.09%	-1.03	-20.4	0
1995-04-22	Molde	L 0-6	54.7	1602	1469	63.59%	18.88%	17.53%	+1.11	-58.8	0
1995-04-22	@ Brann	W 6-0	54.7	1469	1602	17.53%	18.88%	63.59%	-1.11	+58.8	3
1995-04-22	Tromso	L 0-1	60.3	1613	1631	45.58%	20.87%	33.56%	+0.25	-8.4	0
1995-04-22	@ Hamarkameratene	W 1-0	60.3	1631	1613	33.56%	20.87%	45.58%	-0.25	+8.4	3
1995-04-22	Strindheim	D 1-1	60.1	1477	1457	50.68%	20.59%	28.73%	+0.46	-0.9	1
1995-04-22	@ Hodd	D 1-1	60.1	1457	1477	28.73%	20.59%	50.68%	-0.46	+0.9	1
1995-04-22	Start	W 3-1	60.0	1701	1706	47.44%	20.79%	31.77%	+0.32	+10.2	3
1995-04-22	@ Lillestrom	L 1-3	60.0	1706	1701	31.77%	20.79%	47.44%	-0.32	-10.2	0
1995-04-22	Valerenga	L 0-2	51.3	1508	1603	34.85%	20.91%	44.24%	-0.19	-12.7	0
1995-04-22	@ Stabaek	W 2-0	51.3	1603	1508	44.24%	20.91%	34.85%	+0.19	+12.7	3
1995-04-22	Bodo Glimt	W 6-0	47.3	1690	1593	59.83%	19.55%	20.62%	+0.91	+22.3	3
1995-04-22	@ Viking	L 0-6	47.3	1593	1690	20.62%	19.55%	59.83%	-0.91	-22.3	0
1995-04-29	Viking	W 5-4	77.3	1528	1713	24.08%	20.10%	55.81%	-0.70	+8.6	6
1995-04-29	@ Molde	L 4-5	77.3	1713	1528	55.81%	20.10%	24.08%	+0.70	-8.6	3
1995-04-30	Lillestrom	D 3-3	79.2	1571	1711	29.05%	20.61%	50.33%	-0.45	+0.5	1
1995-04-30	@ Bodo Glimt	D 3-3	79.2	1711	1571	50.33%	20.61%	29.05%	+0.45	-0.5	4
1995-04-30	Brann	W 1-0	51.4	1607	1544	56.07%	20.07%	23.85%	+0.72	+4.9	3
1995-04-30	@ Kongsvinger	L 0-1	51.4	1544	1607	23.85%	20.07%	56.07%	-0.72	-4.9	0
1995-04-30	Stabaek	W 4-1	48.4	1696	1496	69.65%	17.40%	12.95%	+1.49	+6.2	3
1995-04-30	@ Start	L 1-4	48.4	1496	1696	12.95%	17.40%	69.65%	-1.49	-6.2	0
1995-04-30	Rosenborg	L 0-5	43.4	1458	1767	13.88%	17.76%	68.37%	-1.41	-12.8	1
1995-04-30	@ Strindheim	W 5-0	43.4	1767	1458	68.37%	17.76%	13.88%	+1.41	+12.8	6
1995-04-30	Hodd	W 4-1	47.3	1640	1476	66.45%	18.24%	15.31%	+1.29	+7.4	6
1995-04-30	@ Tromso	L 1-4	47.3	1476	1640	15.31%	18.24%	66.45%	-1.29	-7.4	1
1995-04-30	Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	65.0	1616	1604	49.63%	20.66%	29.71%	+0.42	-8.5	3
1995-04-30	@ Valerenga	W 2-1	65.0	1604	1616	29.71%	20.66%	49.63%	-0.42	+8.5	3
1995-05-03	Rosenborg	D 1-1	71.2	1539	1779	18.85%	19.19%	61.95%	-1.02	+1.8	1
1995-05-03	@ Brann	D 1-1	71.2	1779	1539	61.95%	19.19%	18.85%	+1.02	-1.8	7
1995-05-03	Start	D 0-0	67.5	1613	1702	35.64%	20.93%	43.42%	-0.16	+0.3	4
1995-05-03	@ Hamarkameratene	D 0-0	67.5	1702	1613	43.42%	20.93%	35.64%	+0.16	-0.3	4
1995-05-03	Valerenga	W 3-0	52.5	1469	1608	29.25%	20.63%	50.12%	-0.44	+24.8	4
1995-05-03	@ Hodd	L 0-3	52.5	1608	1469	50.12%	20.63%	29.25%	+0.44	-24.8	3
1995-05-03	Molde	L 0-1	66.0	1711	1536	67.44%	18.00%	14.56%	+1.35	-11.8	4
1995-05-03	@ Lillestrom	W 1-0	66.0	1536	1711	14.56%	18.00%	67.44%	-1.35	+11.9	9
1995-05-03	Bodo Glimt	W 4-0	48.6	1489	1571	36.64%	20.95%	42.40%	-0.12	+28.2	3
1995-05-03	@ Stabaek	L 0-4	48.6	1571	1489	42.40%	20.95%	36.64%	+0.12	-28.2	1
1995-05-03	Tromso	W 1-0	59.7	1445	1647	22.39%	19.86%	57.75%	-0.80	+10.3	4
1995-05-03	@ Strindheim	L 0-1	59.7	1647	1445	57.75%	19.86%	22.39%	+0.80	-10.3	6
1995-05-03	Kongsvinger	D 0-0	67.9	1704	1612	59.24%	19.65%	21.11%	+0.88	-1.8	4
1995-05-03	@ Viking	D 0-0	67.9	1612	1704	21.11%	19.65%	59.24%	-0.88	+1.8	4
1995-05-06	Hamarkameratene	W 5-0	50.8	1543	1613	38.33%	20.97%	40.70%	-0.05	+33.6	4
1995-05-06	@ Bodo Glimt	L 0-5	50.8	1613	1543	40.70%	20.97%	38.33%	+0.05	-33.6	4
1995-05-07	Strindheim	W 4-1	45.5	1540	1456	58.49%	19.76%	21.75%	+0.84	+10.3	4
1995-05-07	@ Brann	L 1-4	45.5	1456	1540	21.75%	19.76%	58.49%	-0.84	-10.3	4
1995-05-07	Lillestrom	L 1-3	60.5	1614	1699	36.23%	20.94%	42.83%	-0.13	-11.3	4
1995-05-07	@ Kongsvinger	W 3-1	60.5	1699	1614	42.83%	20.94%	36.23%	+0.13	+11.3	7
1995-05-07	Stabaek	W 1-0	49.9	1548	1517	52.04%	20.48%	27.48%	+0.53	+5.5	12
1995-05-07	@ Molde	L 0-1	49.9	1517	1548	27.48%	20.48%	52.04%	-0.53	-5.5	3
1995-05-07	Viking	W 1-0	55.3	1778	1702	57.42%	19.90%	22.67%	+0.78	+4.6	10
1995-05-07	@ Rosenborg	L 0-1	55.3	1702	1778	22.67%	19.90%	57.42%	-0.78	-4.6	4
1995-05-07	Hodd	L 0-2	63.1	1702	1493	70.31%	17.20%	12.49%	+1.54	-23.2	4
1995-05-07	@ Start	W 2-0	63.1	1493	1702	12.49%	17.20%	70.31%	-1.54	+23.2	7
1995-05-07	Tromso	W 2-1	61.7	1583	1637	40.61%	20.97%	38.42%	+0.04	+6.9	6
1995-05-07	@ Valerenga	L 1-2	61.7	1637	1583	38.42%	20.97%	40.61%	-0.04	-6.9	6
1995-05-13	Rosenborg	L 1-3	62.4	1710	1782	38.05%	20.97%	40.98%	-0.06	-11.8	7
1995-05-13	@ Lillestrom	W 3-1	62.4	1782	1710	40.98%	20.97%	38.05%	+0.06	+11.8	13
1995-05-14	Molde	L 1-2	63.3	1580	1553	51.48%	20.53%	27.99%	+0.50	-8.8	4
1995-05-14	@ Hamarkameratene	W 2-1	63.3	1553	1580	27.99%	20.53%	51.48%	-0.50	+8.8	15
1995-05-14	Bodo Glimt	D 0-0	62.5	1517	1577	39.75%	20.97%	39.28%	+0.01	-0.0	8
1995-05-14	@ Hodd	D 0-0	62.5	1577	1517	39.28%	20.97%	39.75%	-0.01	+0.0	5
1995-05-14	Kongsvinger	D 0-0	63.2	1512	1603	35.46%	20.93%	43.62%	-0.16	+0.4	4
1995-05-14	@ Stabaek	D 0-0	63.2	1603	1512	43.62%	20.93%	35.46%	+0.16	-0.4	5
1995-05-14	Valerenga	L 1-2	53.2	1445	1590	28.60%	20.58%	50.83%	-0.47	-5.4	4
1995-05-14	@ Strindheim	W 2-1	53.2	1590	1445	50.83%	20.58%	28.60%	+0.47	+5.4	9
1995-05-14	Start	L 1-4	60.1	1630	1679	41.38%	20.96%	37.65%	+0.07	-17.8	6
1995-05-14	@ Tromso	W 4-1	60.1	1679	1630	37.65%	20.96%	41.38%	-0.07	+17.8	7
1995-05-14	Brann	W 2-0	48.4	1698	1551	64.86%	18.61%	16.53%	+1.19	+6.5	7
1995-05-14	@ Viking	L 0-2	48.4	1551	1698	16.53%	18.61%	64.86%	-1.19	-6.5	4
1995-05-16	Tromso	L 1-2	62.5	1577	1612	43.26%	20.93%	35.80%	+0.15	-7.5	5
1995-05-16	@ Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	62.5	1612	1577	35.80%	20.93%	43.26%	-0.15	+7.6	9
1995-05-16	Lillestrom	D 1-1	69.7	1544	1698	27.45%	20.48%	52.07%	-0.53	+1.0	5
1995-05-16	@ Brann	D 1-1	69.7	1698	1544	52.07%	20.48%	27.45%	+0.53	-1.0	8
1995-05-16	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	53.2	1602	1571	52.16%	20.47%	27.37%	+0.53	+12.7	8
1995-05-16	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-4	53.2	1571	1602	27.37%	20.47%	52.16%	-0.53	-12.7	4
1995-05-16	Hodd	W 7-2	49.3	1562	1517	53.91%	20.31%	25.78%	+0.61	+15.9	18
1995-05-16	@ Molde	L 2-7	49.3	1517	1562	25.78%	20.31%	53.91%	-0.61	-15.9	8
1995-05-16	Stabaek	W 5-2	52.2	1794	1512	75.80%	15.31%	8.89%	+1.96	+3.6	16
1995-05-16	@ Rosenborg	L 2-5	52.2	1512	1794	8.89%	15.31%	75.80%	-1.96	-3.6	4
1995-05-16	Valerenga	L 0-1	65.0	1696	1595	60.29%	19.48%	20.23%	+0.93	-10.7	7
1995-05-16	@ Start	W 1-0	65.0	1595	1696	20.23%	19.48%	60.29%	-0.93	+10.7	12
1995-05-16	Strindheim	W 2-1	49.7	1704	1440	74.57%	15.78%	9.65%	+1.86	+1.9	10
1995-05-16	@ Viking	L 1-2	49.7	1440	1704	9.65%	15.78%	74.57%	-1.86	-1.9	4
1995-05-21	Rosenborg	L 1-3	55.3	1558	1798	18.96%	19.22%	61.82%	-1.01	-6.4	4
1995-05-21	@ Hamarkameratene	W 3-1	55.3	1798	1558	61.82%	19.22%	18.96%	+1.01	+6.4	19
1995-05-21	Kongsvinger	W 3-0	52.9	1501	1615	32.33%	20.81%	46.86%	-0.30	+23.4	11
1995-05-21	@ Hodd	L 0-3	52.9	1615	1501	46.86%	20.81%	32.33%	+0.30	-23.4	8
1995-05-21	Viking	W 4-1	58.2	1697	1706	46.97%	20.81%	32.22%	+0.30	+14.6	11
1995-05-21	@ Lillestrom	L 1-4	58.2	1706	1697	32.22%	20.81%	46.97%	-0.30	-14.6	10
1995-05-21	Brann	W 3-0	47.6	1509	1545	43.08%	20.94%	35.98%	+0.14	+18.9	7
1995-05-21	@ Stabaek	L 0-3	47.6	1545	1509	35.98%	20.94%	43.08%	-0.14	-18.9	5
1995-05-21	Start	L 2-6	49.9	1438	1686	18.28%	19.06%	62.66%	-1.06	-9.6	4
1995-05-21	@ Strindheim	W 6-2	49.9	1686	1438	62.66%	19.06%	18.28%	+1.06	+9.6	10
1995-05-21	Molde	D 2-2	73.4	1620	1578	53.41%	20.36%	26.24%	+0.59	-0.8	10
1995-05-21	@ Tromso	D 2-2	73.4	1578	1620	26.24%	20.36%	53.41%	-0.59	+0.8	19
1995-05-21	Bodo Glimt	L 0-4	55.0	1606	1569	52.78%	20.42%	26.80%	+0.56	-34.0	12
1995-05-21	@ Valerenga	W 4-0	55.0	1569	1606	26.80%	20.42%	52.78%	-0.56	+34.0	8
1995-05-28	Start	L 1-2	62.0	1603	1695	35.25%	20.92%	43.83%	-0.17	-6.4	8
1995-05-28	@ Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	62.0	1695	1603	43.83%	20.92%	35.25%	+0.17	+6.4	13
1995-05-28	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	52.6	1526	1552	44.66%	20.90%	34.44%	+0.21	+15.4	8
1995-05-28	@ Brann	L 1-4	52.6	1552	1526	34.44%	20.90%	44.66%	-0.21	-15.4	4
1995-05-28	Tromso	D 1-1	69.0	1591	1619	44.38%	20.91%	34.71%	+0.20	-0.4	9
1995-05-28	@ Kongsvinger	D 1-1	69.0	1619	1591	34.71%	20.91%	44.38%	-0.20	+0.4	11
1995-05-28	Strindheim	W 3-0	40.6	1712	1428	75.93%	15.26%	8.81%	+1.97	+4.9	14
1995-05-28	@ Lillestrom	L 0-3	40.6	1428	1712	8.81%	15.26%	75.93%	-1.97	-4.9	4
1995-05-28	Valerenga	L 0-1	59.1	1579	1572	49.05%	20.70%	30.25%	+0.39	-8.9	19
1995-05-28	@ Molde	W 1-0	59.1	1572	1579	30.25%	20.70%	49.05%	-0.39	+8.9	15
1995-05-28	Hodd	W 6-1	46.4	1804	1524	75.68%	15.36%	8.96%	+1.95	+6.7	22
1995-05-28	@ Rosenborg	L 1-6	46.4	1524	1804	8.96%	15.36%	75.68%	-1.95	-6.7	11
1995-05-28	Stabaek	W 2-0	47.4	1691	1528	66.45%	18.24%	15.31%	+1.29	+6.0	13
1995-05-28	@ Viking	L 0-2	47.4	1528	1691	15.31%	18.24%	66.45%	-1.29	-6.0	7
1995-06-02	Viking	L 0-5	48.2	1536	1697	26.68%	20.40%	52.92%	-0.57	-23.7	4
1995-06-02	@ Hamarkameratene	W 5-0	48.2	1697	1536	52.92%	20.40%	26.68%	+0.57	+23.7	16
1995-06-02	Brann	W 1-0	51.9	1517	1542	44.79%	20.89%	34.32%	+0.21	+6.6	14
1995-06-02	@ Hodd	L 0-1	51.9	1542	1517	34.32%	20.89%	44.79%	-0.21	-6.6	8
1995-06-02	Lillestrom	L 0-2	50.6	1522	1717	23.02%	19.96%	57.02%	-0.76	-8.9	7
1995-06-02	@ Stabaek	W 2-0	50.6	1717	1522	57.02%	19.96%	23.02%	+0.76	+8.9	17
1995-06-02	Molde	L 1-3	67.5	1702	1570	63.40%	18.92%	17.69%	+1.10	-18.3	13
1995-06-02	@ Start	W 3-1	67.5	1570	1702	17.69%	18.92%	63.40%	-1.10	+18.3	22
1995-06-02	Bodo Glimt	D 1-1	63.3	1423	1597	25.32%	20.26%	54.42%	-0.64	+1.2	5
1995-06-02	@ Strindheim	D 1-1	63.3	1597	1423	54.42%	20.26%	25.32%	+0.64	-1.2	9
1995-06-02	Rosenborg	L 1-2	59.4	1619	1811	23.41%	20.01%	56.58%	-0.74	-4.5	11
1995-06-02	@ Tromso	W 2-1	59.4	1811	1619	56.58%	20.01%	23.41%	+0.74	+4.5	25
1995-06-02	Kongsvinger	L 1-3	61.1	1581	1591	46.69%	20.82%	32.49%	+0.29	-13.9	15
1995-06-02	@ Valerenga	W 3-1	61.1	1591	1581	32.49%	20.82%	46.69%	-0.29	+13.9	12
1995-06-11	Tromso	W 4-2	63.4	1535	1615	36.99%	20.96%	42.05%	-0.10	+11.4	11
1995-06-11	@ Brann	L 2-4	63.4	1615	1535	42.05%	20.96%	36.99%	+0.10	-11.4	11
1995-06-11	Start	W 2-0	57.4	1605	1683	37.15%	20.96%	41.89%	-0.10	+14.7	15
1995-06-11	@ Kongsvinger	L 0-2	57.4	1683	1605	41.89%	20.96%	37.15%	+0.10	-14.7	13
1995-06-11	Hamarkameratene	D 2-2	75.2	1726	1513	70.71%	17.08%	12.21%	+1.57	-1.9	18
1995-06-11	@ Lillestrom	D 2-2	75.2	1513	1726	12.21%	17.08%	70.71%	-1.57	+1.9	5
1995-06-11	Bodo Glimt	L 0-3	54.9	1588	1596	47.13%	20.80%	32.07%	+0.31	-23.5	22
1995-06-11	@ Molde	W 3-0	54.9	1596	1588	32.07%	20.80%	47.13%	-0.31	+23.5	12
1995-06-11	Valerenga	W 3-2	58.7	1815	1567	73.44%	16.19%	10.37%	+1.77	+1.9	28
1995-06-11	@ Rosenborg	L 2-3	58.7	1567	1815	10.37%	16.19%	73.44%	-1.77	-1.9	15
1995-06-11	Strindheim	W 3-0	38.6	1513	1425	58.83%	19.71%	21.46%	+0.85	+12.1	10
1995-06-11	@ Stabaek	L 0-3	38.6	1425	1513	21.46%	19.71%	58.83%	-0.85	-12.1	5
1995-06-11	Hodd	W 3-0	45.0	1721	1524	69.36%	17.48%	13.16%	+1.48	+7.5	19
1995-06-11	@ Viking	L 0-3	45.0	1524	1721	13.16%	17.48%	69.36%	-1.48	-7.5	14
1995-06-14	Tromso	W 5-4	67.1	1724	1603	62.30%	19.13%	18.57%	+1.04	+3.3	21
1995-06-14	@ Lillestrom	L 4-5	67.1	1603	1724	18.57%	19.13%	62.30%	-1.04	-3.3	11
1995-06-18	Kongsvinger	D 2-2	74.1	1619	1620	48.01%	20.76%	31.23%	+0.35	-0.5	13
1995-06-18	@ Bodo Glimt	D 2-2	74.1	1620	1619	31.23%	20.76%	48.01%	-0.35	+0.5	16
1995-06-18	Stabaek	W 5-0	44.5	1515	1525	46.72%	20.82%	32.46%	+0.29	+28.0	8
1995-06-18	@ Hamarkameratene	L 0-5	44.5	1525	1515	32.46%	20.82%	46.72%	-0.29	-28.0	10
1995-06-18	Lillestrom	L 0-1	52.7	1517	1727	21.54%	19.72%	58.74%	-0.85	-4.4	14
1995-06-18	@ Hodd	W 1-0	52.7	1727	1517	58.74%	19.72%	21.54%	+0.85	+4.4	24
1995-06-18	Rosenborg	L 1-3	59.2	1669	1817	28.12%	20.54%	51.35%	-0.49	-9.2	13
1995-06-18	@ Start	W 3-1	59.2	1817	1669	51.35%	20.54%	28.12%	+0.49	+9.2	31
1995-06-18	Molde	L 1-3	48.7	1413	1565	27.67%	20.50%	51.83%	-0.52	-9.1	5
1995-06-18	@ Strindheim	W 3-1	48.7	1565	1413	51.83%	20.50%	27.67%	+0.52	+9.1	25
1995-06-18	Viking	W 1-0	62.4	1600	1729	30.51%	20.71%	48.77%	-0.38	+8.8	14
1995-06-18	@ Tromso	L 0-1	62.4	1729	1600	48.77%	20.71%	30.51%	+0.38	-8.8	19
1995-06-18	Brann	W 3-1	53.9	1565	1547	50.48%	20.60%	28.92%	+0.46	+9.4	18
1995-06-18	@ Valerenga	L 1-3	53.9	1547	1565	28.92%	20.60%	50.48%	-0.46	-9.4	11
1995-06-25	Start	L 0-4	49.2	1537	1660	31.29%	20.76%	47.95%	-0.35	-22.0	11
1995-06-25	@ Brann	W 4-0	49.2	1660	1537	47.95%	20.76%	31.29%	+0.35	+22.0	16
1995-06-25	Strindheim	D 0-0	57.8	1543	1403	64.12%	18.77%	17.11%	+1.15	-2.2	9
1995-06-25	@ Hamarkameratene	D 0-0	57.8	1403	1543	17.11%	18.77%	64.12%	-1.15	+2.2	6
1995-06-25	Molde	L 0-2	59.1	1620	1574	54.00%	20.30%	25.70%	+0.62	-18.3	16
1995-06-25	@ Kongsvinger	W 2-0	59.1	1574	1620	25.70%	20.30%	54.00%	-0.62	+18.2	28
1995-06-25	Bodo Glimt	D 3-3	81.7	1826	1619	70.26%	17.22%	12.52%	+1.54	-1.5	32
1995-06-25	@ Rosenborg	D 3-3	81.7	1619	1826	12.52%	17.22%	70.26%	-1.54	+1.6	14
1995-06-25	Hodd	W 3-1	51.7	1497	1512	46.03%	20.85%	33.12%	+0.26	+10.5	13
1995-06-25	@ Stabaek	L 1-3	51.7	1512	1497	33.12%	20.85%	46.03%	-0.26	-10.5	14
1995-06-25	Valerenga	W 5-0	45.6	1720	1574	64.75%	18.64%	16.62%	+1.18	+15.3	22
1995-06-25	@ Viking	L 0-5	45.6	1574	1720	16.62%	18.64%	64.75%	-1.18	-15.3	18
1995-06-28	Stabaek	D 2-2	71.5	1609	1507	60.29%	19.48%	20.23%	+0.93	-1.2	15
1995-06-28	@ Tromso	D 2-2	71.5	1507	1609	20.23%	19.48%	60.29%	-0.93	+1.3	14
1995-07-02	Brann	W 3-1	51.6	1620	1515	60.67%	19.42%	19.92%	+0.95	+6.7	17
1995-07-02	@ Bodo Glimt	L 1-3	51.6	1515	1620	19.92%	19.42%	60.67%	-0.95	-6.7	11
1995-07-02	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	51.9	1502	1540	42.80%	20.94%	36.26%	+0.13	+16.0	17
1995-07-02	@ Hodd	L 1-4	51.9	1540	1502	36.26%	20.94%	42.80%	-0.13	-16.0	9
1995-07-02	Rosenborg	D 2-2	76.6	1592	1825	19.55%	19.34%	61.11%	-0.98	+1.3	29
1995-07-02	@ Molde	D 2-2	76.6	1825	1592	61.11%	19.34%	19.55%	+0.98	-1.3	33
1995-07-02	Viking	L 0-2	58.2	1682	1735	40.71%	20.97%	38.32%	+0.05	-14.4	16
1995-07-02	@ Start	W 2-0	58.2	1735	1682	38.32%	20.97%	40.71%	-0.05	+14.4	25
1995-07-02	Kongsvinger	L 1-3	48.3	1406	1602	22.94%	19.94%	57.12%	-0.77	-7.7	6
1995-07-02	@ Strindheim	W 3-1	48.3	1602	1406	57.12%	19.94%	22.94%	+0.77	+7.7	19
1995-07-02	Lillestrom	D 0-0	67.4	1559	1732	25.37%	20.26%	54.36%	-0.63	+1.3	19
1995-07-02	@ Valerenga	D 0-0	67.4	1732	1559	54.36%	20.26%	25.37%	+0.63	-1.3	25
1995-07-12	Tromso	L 0-2	51.2	1509	1608	34.34%	20.89%	44.77%	-0.21	-12.5	14
1995-07-12	@ Stabaek	W 2-0	51.2	1608	1509	44.77%	20.89%	34.34%	+0.21	+12.5	18
1995-07-16	Bodo Glimt	W 4-2	64.6	1508	1627	31.79%	20.79%	47.43%	-0.32	+12.6	14
1995-07-16	@ Brann	L 2-4	64.6	1627	1508	47.43%	20.79%	31.79%	+0.32	-12.6	17
1995-07-16	Hodd	W 2-1	54.0	1524	1518	48.96%	20.70%	30.33%	+0.39	+5.7	12
1995-07-16	@ Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	54.0	1518	1524	30.33%	20.70%	48.96%	-0.39	-5.7	17
1995-07-16	Strindheim	W 5-1	40.7	1610	1398	70.58%	17.12%	12.30%	+1.56	+7.6	22
1995-07-16	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-5	40.7	1398	1610	12.30%	17.12%	70.58%	-1.56	-7.6	6
1995-07-16	Valerenga	L 1-3	68.6	1730	1560	67.03%	18.10%	14.86%	+1.32	-19.2	25
1995-07-16	@ Lillestrom	W 3-1	68.6	1560	1730	14.86%	18.10%	67.03%	-1.32	+19.2	22
1995-07-16	Start	L 1-3	67.7	1749	1667	58.17%	19.80%	22.03%	+0.82	-16.9	25
1995-07-16	@ Viking	W 3-1	67.7	1667	1749	22.03%	19.80%	58.17%	-0.82	+16.9	19
1995-07-19	Lillestrom	D 0-0	67.6	1620	1711	35.40%	20.92%	43.68%	-0.17	+0.4	19
1995-07-19	@ Tromso	D 0-0	67.6	1711	1620	43.68%	20.92%	35.40%	+0.17	-0.4	26
1995-07-23	Rosenborg	L 1-2	58.8	1614	1824	21.67%	19.74%	58.58%	-0.84	-4.2	17
1995-07-23	@ Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	58.8	1824	1614	58.58%	19.74%	21.67%	+0.84	+4.2	36
1995-07-23	Stabaek	D 1-1	62.8	1512	1496	50.18%	20.62%	29.19%	+0.44	-0.8	18
1995-07-23	@ Hodd	D 1-1	62.8	1496	1512	29.19%	20.62%	50.18%	-0.44	+0.9	15
1995-07-23	Kongsvinger	W 3-1	58.3	1593	1617	44.86%	20.89%	34.25%	+0.22	+10.8	32
1995-07-23	@ Molde	L 1-3	58.3	1617	1593	34.25%	20.89%	44.86%	-0.22	-10.8	22
1995-07-23	Brann	W 1-0	49.7	1684	1521	66.39%	18.26%	15.35%	+1.28	+3.2	22
1995-07-23	@ Start	L 0-1	49.7	1521	1684	15.35%	18.26%	66.39%	-1.28	-3.2	14
1995-07-23	Hamarkameratene	L 2-4	51.5	1390	1530	29.19%	20.62%	50.19%	-0.44	-8.5	6
1995-07-23	@ Strindheim	W 4-2	51.5	1530	1390	50.19%	20.62%	29.19%	+0.44	+8.5	15
1995-07-23	Viking	D 1-1	70.8	1579	1732	27.60%	20.49%	51.91%	-0.52	+1.0	23
1995-07-23	@ Valerenga	D 1-1	70.8	1732	1579	51.91%	20.49%	27.60%	+0.52	-1.0	26
1995-07-30	Valerenga	W 2-1	58.8	1518	1580	39.39%	20.97%	39.64%	+0.00	+7.0	17
1995-07-30	@ Brann	L 1-2	58.8	1580	1518	39.64%	20.97%	39.39%	+0.00	-7.0	23
1995-07-30	Bodo Glimt	L 1-2	64.3	1606	1610	47.61%	20.78%	31.61%	+0.33	-8.2	22
1995-07-30	@ Kongsvinger	W 2-1	64.3	1610	1606	31.61%	20.78%	47.61%	-0.33	+8.2	20
1995-07-30	Hodd	W 6-0	43.3	1711	1511	69.59%	17.41%	13.00%	+1.49	+14.2	29
1995-07-30	@ Lillestrom	L 0-6	43.3	1511	1711	13.00%	17.41%	69.59%	-1.49	-14.2	18
1995-07-30	Strindheim	W 4-1	41.2	1604	1382	71.43%	16.86%	11.71%	+1.62	+5.6	35
1995-07-30	@ Molde	L 1-4	41.2	1382	1604	11.71%	16.86%	71.43%	-1.62	-5.6	6
1995-07-30	Start	W 4-1	53.5	1828	1687	64.25%	18.74%	17.00%	+1.15	+8.2	39
1995-07-30	@ Rosenborg	L 1-4	53.5	1687	1828	17.00%	18.74%	64.25%	-1.15	-8.2	22
1995-07-30	Hamarkameratene	W 3-1	53.7	1497	1538	42.41%	20.95%	36.64%	+0.12	+11.4	18
1995-07-30	@ Stabaek	L 1-3	53.7	1538	1497	36.64%	20.95%	42.41%	-0.12	-11.4	15
1995-07-30	Tromso	W 3-1	55.4	1731	1620	61.29%	19.31%	19.40%	+0.99	+6.6	29
1995-07-30	@ Viking	L 1-3	55.4	1620	1731	19.40%	19.31%	61.29%	-0.99	-6.6	19
1995-08-05	Viking	L 0-1	51.6	1497	1738	18.84%	19.19%	61.97%	-1.02	-3.9	18
1995-08-05	@ Hodd	W 1-0	51.6	1738	1497	61.97%	19.19%	18.84%	+1.02	+3.9	32
1995-08-06	Molde	W 3-2	63.9	1618	1610	49.20%	20.69%	30.11%	+0.40	+5.3	23
1995-08-06	@ Bodo Glimt	L 2-3	63.9	1610	1618	30.11%	20.69%	49.20%	-0.40	-5.3	35
1995-08-06	Lillestrom	L 0-2	50.8	1527	1725	22.76%	19.92%	57.32%	-0.78	-8.8	15
1995-08-06	@ Hamarkameratene	W 2-0	50.8	1725	1527	57.32%	19.92%	22.76%	+0.78	+8.8	32
1995-08-06	Kongsvinger	W 6-2	54.8	1679	1598	58.03%	19.82%	22.15%	+0.81	+11.5	25
1995-08-06	@ Start	L 2-6	54.8	1598	1679	22.15%	19.82%	58.03%	-0.81	-11.5	22
1995-08-06	Stabaek	W 2-1	54.0	1376	1508	30.09%	20.69%	49.22%	-0.40	+8.4	9
1995-08-06	@ Strindheim	L 1-2	54.0	1508	1376	49.22%	20.69%	30.09%	+0.40	-8.4	18
1995-08-06	Brann	D 2-2	72.1	1614	1525	58.94%	19.69%	21.37%	+0.86	-1.2	20
1995-08-06	@ Tromso	D 2-2	72.1	1525	1614	21.37%	19.69%	58.94%	-0.86	+1.2	18
1995-08-06	Rosenborg	W 2-1	71.1	1573	1836	17.11%	18.77%	64.12%	-1.14	+10.7	26
1995-08-06	@ Valerenga	L 1-2	71.1	1836	1573	64.12%	18.77%	17.11%	+1.14	-10.7	39
1995-08-18	Hamarkameratene	L 0-2	64.6	1742	1518	71.55%	16.82%	11.63%	+1.63	-23.5	32
1995-08-18	@ Viking	W 2-0	64.6	1518	1742	11.63%	16.82%	71.55%	-1.63	+23.5	18
1995-08-20	Strindheim	W 3-2	50.3	1624	1385	72.71%	16.44%	10.85%	+1.71	+2.0	26
1995-08-20	@ Bodo Glimt	L 2-3	50.3	1385	1624	10.85%	16.44%	72.71%	-1.71	-2.0	9
1995-08-20	Hodd	L 1-2	59.7	1526	1493	52.35%	20.46%	27.20%	+0.54	-8.9	18
1995-08-20	@ Brann	W 2-1	59.7	1493	1526	27.20%	20.46%	52.35%	-0.54	+8.9	21
1995-08-20	Valerenga	D 2-2	72.7	1587	1584	48.45%	20.73%	30.82%	+0.37	-0.5	23
1995-08-20	@ Kongsvinger	D 2-2	72.7	1584	1587	30.82%	20.73%	48.45%	-0.37	+0.5	27
1995-08-20	Stabaek	D 2-2	75.3	1734	1500	72.33%	16.57%	11.11%	+1.69	-2.0	33
1995-08-20	@ Lillestrom	D 2-2	75.3	1500	1734	11.11%	16.57%	72.33%	-1.69	+2.0	19
1995-08-20	Start	W 2-1	64.3	1605	1691	36.08%	20.94%	42.98%	-0.14	+7.5	38
1995-08-20	@ Molde	L 1-2	64.3	1691	1605	42.98%	20.94%	36.08%	+0.14	-7.5	25
1995-08-20	Tromso	W 2-0	48.7	1825	1613	70.65%	17.10%	12.25%	+1.56	+4.8	42
1995-08-20	@ Rosenborg	L 0-2	48.7	1613	1825	12.25%	17.10%	70.65%	-1.56	-4.8	20
1995-08-26	Bodo Glimt	L 2-5	67.6	1683	1626	55.34%	20.16%	24.50%	+0.68	-19.8	25
1995-08-26	@ Start	W 5-2	67.6	1626	1683	24.50%	20.16%	55.34%	-0.68	+19.8	29
1995-08-27	Brann	L 1-3	58.8	1542	1517	51.28%	20.54%	28.18%	+0.49	-15.1	18
1995-08-27	@ Hamarkameratene	W 3-1	58.8	1517	1542	28.18%	20.54%	51.28%	-0.49	+15.1	21
1995-08-27	Rosenborg	L 1-4	50.6	1502	1830	12.70%	17.29%	70.00%	-1.52	-6.1	21
1995-08-27	@ Hodd	W 4-1	50.6	1830	1502	70.00%	17.29%	12.70%	+1.52	+6.1	45
1995-08-27	Viking	W 2-0	61.1	1502	1718	21.00%	19.63%	59.37%	-0.88	+19.9	22
1995-08-27	@ Stabaek	L 0-2	61.1	1718	1502	59.37%	19.63%	21.00%	+0.88	-19.9	32
1995-08-27	Lillestrom	D 1-1	67.7	1383	1732	11.54%	16.78%	71.69%	-1.64	+2.6	10
1995-08-27	@ Strindheim	D 1-1	67.7	1732	1383	71.69%	16.78%	11.54%	+1.64	-2.6	34
1995-08-27	Kongsvinger	W 8-0	49.4	1608	1586	50.92%	20.57%	28.51%	+0.48	+39.2	23
1995-08-27	@ Tromso	L 0-8	49.4	1586	1608	28.51%	20.57%	50.92%	-0.48	-39.2	23
1995-08-27	Molde	D 2-2	73.2	1585	1612	44.37%	20.91%	34.73%	+0.20	-0.3	28
1995-08-27	@ Valerenga	D 2-2	73.2	1612	1585	34.73%	20.91%	44.37%	-0.20	+0.3	39
1995-09-02	Valerenga	D 2-2	74.2	1645	1584	55.75%	20.11%	24.14%	+0.70	-1.0	30
1995-09-02	@ Bodo Glimt	D 2-2	74.2	1584	1645	24.14%	20.11%	55.75%	-0.70	+1.0	29
1995-09-02	Stabaek	W 1-0	50.3	1532	1522	49.47%	20.67%	29.86%	+0.41	+5.9	24
1995-09-02	@ Brann	L 0-1	50.3	1522	1532	29.86%	20.67%	49.47%	-0.41	-5.9	22
1995-09-02	Hodd	W 2-1	52.3	1547	1496	54.59%	20.24%	25.17%	+0.64	+4.8	26
1995-09-02	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-2	52.3	1496	1547	25.17%	20.24%	54.59%	-0.64	-4.8	21
1995-09-02	Tromso	L 0-7	54.7	1612	1647	43.35%	20.93%	35.72%	+0.15	-48.6	39
1995-09-02	@ Molde	W 7-0	54.7	1647	1612	35.72%	20.93%	43.35%	-0.15	+48.6	26
1995-09-02	Hamarkameratene	W 9-1	45.3	1836	1527	77.63%	14.57%	7.80%	+2.12	+8.9	48
1995-09-02	@ Rosenborg	L 1-9	45.3	1527	1836	7.80%	14.57%	77.63%	-2.12	-8.9	18
1995-09-02	Strindheim	L 4-6	72.6	1663	1385	75.54%	15.41%	9.05%	+1.94	-17.4	25
1995-09-02	@ Start	W 6-4	72.6	1385	1663	9.05%	15.41%	75.54%	-1.94	+17.4	13
1995-09-02	Lillestrom	W 3-1	61.2	1698	1729	43.91%	20.92%	35.17%	+0.18	+11.1	35
1995-09-02	@ Viking	L 1-3	61.2	1729	1698	35.17%	20.92%	43.91%	-0.18	-11.1	34
1995-09-08	Viking	W 5-3	72.0	1403	1710	14.00%	17.80%	68.20%	-1.40	+16.5	16
1995-09-08	@ Strindheim	L 3-5	72.0	1710	1403	68.20%	17.80%	14.00%	+1.40	-16.5	35
1995-09-09	Brann	L 1-3	68.3	1718	1538	67.90%	17.88%	14.22%	+1.38	-19.5	34
1995-09-09	@ Lillestrom	W 3-1	68.3	1538	1718	14.22%	17.88%	67.90%	-1.38	+19.5	27
1995-09-09	Bodo Glimt	L 0-4	58.3	1696	1644	54.59%	20.24%	25.17%	+0.64	-35.0	26
1995-09-09	@ Tromso	W 4-0	58.3	1644	1696	25.17%	20.24%	54.59%	-0.64	+35.0	33
1995-09-10	Kongsvinger	W 2-1	56.6	1518	1552	43.42%	20.93%	35.65%	+0.16	+6.5	21
1995-09-10	@ Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	56.6	1552	1518	35.65%	20.93%	43.42%	-0.16	-6.5	26
1995-09-10	Molde	D 2-2	69.0	1491	1564	37.95%	20.97%	41.08%	-0.06	+0.1	22
1995-09-10	@ Hodd	D 2-2	69.0	1564	1491	41.08%	20.97%	37.95%	+0.06	-0.1	40
1995-09-10	Rosenborg	W 2-1	72.1	1516	1845	12.64%	17.27%	70.09%	-1.53	+11.6	25
1995-09-10	@ Stabaek	L 1-2	72.1	1845	1516	70.09%	17.27%	12.64%	+1.53	-11.5	48
1995-09-10	Start	W 4-1	58.3	1585	1646	39.67%	20.97%	39.36%	+0.01	+17.1	32
1995-09-10	@ Valerenga	L 1-4	58.3	1646	1585	39.36%	20.97%	39.67%	-0.01	-17.1	25
1995-09-23	Lillestrom	W 2-1	57.6	1833	1699	63.71%	18.85%	17.44%	+1.12	+3.4	51
1995-09-23	@ Rosenborg	L 1-2	57.6	1699	1833	17.44%	18.85%	63.71%	-1.12	-3.4	34
1995-09-24	Hodd	W 4-0	42.4	1679	1491	68.62%	17.69%	13.69%	+1.43	+10.2	36
1995-09-24	@ Bodo Glimt	L 0-4	42.4	1491	1679	13.69%	17.69%	68.62%	-1.43	-10.2	22
1995-09-24	Stabaek	D 0-0	61.9	1545	1527	50.45%	20.61%	28.95%	+0.45	-1.0	27
1995-09-24	@ Kongsvinger	D 0-0	61.9	1527	1545	28.95%	20.61%	50.45%	-0.45	+1.0	26
1995-09-24	Hamarkameratene	W 3-2	59.0	1564	1524	53.16%	20.38%	26.46%	+0.58	+4.8	43
1995-09-24	@ Molde	L 2-3	59.0	1524	1564	26.46%	20.38%	53.16%	-0.58	-4.8	21
1995-09-24	Tromso	W 2-1	61.9	1629	1661	43.75%	20.92%	35.33%	+0.17	+6.4	28
1995-09-24	@ Start	L 1-2	61.9	1661	1629	35.33%	20.92%	43.75%	-0.17	-6.4	26
1995-09-24	Strindheim	W 9-2	41.1	1602	1419	68.19%	17.80%	14.01%	+1.40	+12.0	35
1995-09-24	@ Valerenga	L 2-9	41.1	1419	1602	14.01%	17.80%	68.19%	-1.40	-12.0	16
1995-09-30	Rosenborg	D 2-2	76.7	1693	1837	28.66%	20.58%	50.76%	-0.47	+0.7	36
1995-09-30	@ Viking	D 2-2	76.7	1837	1693	50.76%	20.58%	28.66%	+0.47	-0.7	52
1995-10-01	Bodo Glimt	L 0-6	47.7	1519	1690	25.65%	20.30%	54.05%	-0.62	-27.2	21
1995-10-01	@ Hamarkameratene	W 6-0	47.7	1690	1519	54.05%	20.30%	25.65%	+0.62	+27.2	39
1995-10-01	Start	W 2-1	63.0	1481	1635	27.44%	20.48%	52.08%	-0.53	+8.8	25
1995-10-01	@ Hodd	L 1-2	63.0	1635	1481	52.08%	20.48%	27.44%	+0.53	-8.8	28
1995-10-01	Kongsvinger	W 3-1	52.7	1695	1544	65.25%	18.52%	16.23%	+1.21	+5.5	37
1995-10-01	@ Lillestrom	L 1-3	52.7	1544	1695	16.23%	18.52%	65.25%	-1.21	-5.5	27
1995-10-01	Molde	W 3-1	55.8	1528	1568	42.61%	20.95%	36.44%	+0.12	+11.4	29
1995-10-01	@ Stabaek	L 1-3	55.8	1568	1528	36.44%	20.95%	42.61%	-0.12	-11.4	43
1995-10-01	Brann	D 2-2	65.8	1407	1558	27.89%	20.52%	51.59%	-0.51	+0.7	17
1995-10-01	@ Strindheim	D 2-2	65.8	1558	1407	51.59%	20.52%	27.89%	+0.51	-0.7	28
1995-10-01	Valerenga	W 2-1	58.8	1654	1614	53.20%	20.38%	26.42%	+0.58	+5.0	29
1995-10-01	@ Tromso	L 1-2	58.8	1614	1654	26.42%	20.38%	53.20%	-0.58	-5.0	35
1995-10-04	Molde	W 2-0	46.9	1836	1557	75.62%	15.38%	9.00%	+1.94	+3.5	55
1995-10-04	@ Rosenborg	L 0-2	46.9	1557	1836	9.00%	15.38%	75.62%	-1.94	-3.5	43
1995-10-04	Viking	W 2-1	65.6	1557	1694	29.51%	20.65%	49.84%	-0.43	+8.5	31
1995-10-04	@ Brann	L 1-2	65.6	1694	1557	49.84%	20.65%	29.51%	+0.43	-8.5	36
1995-10-07	Lillestrom	L 1-2	59.2	1554	1701	28.27%	20.55%	51.18%	-0.49	-5.3	43
1995-10-07	@ Molde	W 2-1	59.2	1701	1554	51.18%	20.55%	28.27%	+0.49	+5.3	40
1995-10-08	Stabaek	L 0-1	66.2	1717	1540	67.64%	17.95%	14.41%	+1.36	-11.9	39
1995-10-08	@ Bodo Glimt	W 1-0	66.2	1540	1717	14.41%	17.95%	67.64%	-1.36	+11.9	32
1995-10-08	Viking	L 3-4	66.9	1539	1685	28.38%	20.56%	51.06%	-0.48	-5.0	27
1995-10-08	@ Kongsvinger	W 4-3	66.9	1685	1539	51.06%	20.56%	28.38%	+0.48	+5.0	39
1995-10-08	Brann	W 3-1	51.6	1840	1565	75.28%	15.51%	9.21%	+1.92	+3.1	58
1995-10-08	@ Rosenborg	L 1-3	51.6	1565	1840	9.21%	15.51%	75.28%	-1.92	-3.1	31
1995-10-08	Hamarkameratene	L 1-2	66.0	1626	1492	63.65%	18.87%	17.48%	+1.12	-10.6	28
1995-10-08	@ Start	W 2-1	66.0	1492	1626	17.48%	18.87%	63.65%	-1.12	+10.6	24
1995-10-08	Strindheim	W 1-0	43.5	1659	1408	73.64%	16.12%	10.24%	+1.79	+2.1	32
1995-10-08	@ Tromso	L 0-1	43.5	1408	1659	10.24%	16.12%	73.64%	-1.79	-2.1	17
1995-10-08	Hodd	W 3-2	56.7	1609	1490	62.19%	19.15%	18.66%	+1.03	+3.5	38
1995-10-08	@ Valerenga	L 2-3	56.7	1490	1609	18.66%	19.15%	62.19%	-1.03	-3.5	25
1995-10-15	Kongsvinger	D 1-1	66.0	1562	1534	51.77%	20.50%	27.72%	+0.51	-1.0	32
1995-10-15	@ Brann	D 1-1	66.0	1534	1562	27.72%	20.50%	51.77%	-0.51	+1.0	28
1995-10-15	Valerenga	W 1-0	57.3	1503	1613	32.87%	20.84%	46.30%	-0.28	+8.5	27
1995-10-15	@ Hamarkameratene	L 0-1	57.3	1613	1503	46.30%	20.84%	32.87%	+0.28	-8.5	38
1995-10-15	Tromso	L 2-3	60.4	1486	1661	25.13%	20.24%	54.64%	-0.65	-4.6	25
1995-10-15	@ Hodd	W 3-2	60.4	1661	1486	54.64%	20.24%	25.13%	+0.65	+4.5	35
1995-10-15	Bodo Glimt	D 1-1	71.6	1706	1705	48.25%	20.74%	31.01%	+0.36	-0.7	41
1995-10-15	@ Lillestrom	D 1-1	71.6	1705	1706	31.01%	20.74%	48.25%	-0.36	+0.7	40
1995-10-15	Strindheim	W 2-1	49.0	1843	1406	84.59%	11.18%	4.23%	+2.84	+0.8	61
1995-10-15	@ Rosenborg	L 1-2	49.0	1406	1843	4.23%	11.18%	84.59%	-2.84	-0.8	17
1995-10-15	Start	L 1-3	58.7	1552	1616	39.17%	20.97%	39.86%	-0.01	-12.1	32
1995-10-15	@ Stabaek	W 3-1	58.7	1616	1552	39.86%	20.97%	39.17%	+0.01	+12.1	31
1995-10-15	Molde	D 2-2	74.7	1690	1548	64.40%	18.71%	16.89%	+1.16	-1.5	40
1995-10-15	@ Viking	D 2-2	74.7	1548	1690	16.89%	18.71%	64.40%	-1.16	+1.5	44
1995-10-22	Viking	W 6-2	58.3	1706	1689	50.32%	20.61%	29.07%	+0.45	+14.6	43
1995-10-22	@ Bodo Glimt	L 2-6	58.3	1689	1706	29.07%	20.61%	50.32%	-0.45	-14.6	40
1995-10-22	Rosenborg	D 1-1	72.2	1535	1843	13.89%	17.76%	68.35%	-1.41	+2.3	29
1995-10-22	@ Kongsvinger	D 1-1	72.2	1843	1535	68.35%	17.76%	13.89%	+1.41	-2.3	62
1995-10-22	Brann	W 4-2	59.4	1550	1561	46.53%	20.83%	32.64%	+0.29	+9.3	47
1995-10-22	@ Molde	L 2-4	59.4	1561	1550	32.64%	20.83%	46.53%	-0.29	-9.3	32
1995-10-22	Lillestrom	W 2-1	64.4	1628	1705	37.27%	20.96%	41.77%	-0.09	+7.3	34
1995-10-22	@ Start	L 1-2	64.4	1705	1628	41.77%	20.96%	37.27%	+0.09	-7.3	41
1995-10-22	Hodd	L 1-5	45.1	1405	1482	37.40%	20.96%	41.64%	-0.08	-21.2	17
1995-10-22	@ Strindheim	W 5-1	45.1	1482	1405	41.64%	20.96%	37.40%	+0.08	+21.2	28
1995-10-22	Hamarkameratene	W 4-1	49.3	1666	1511	65.62%	18.44%	15.94%	+1.23	+7.7	38
1995-10-22	@ Tromso	L 1-4	49.3	1511	1666	15.94%	18.44%	65.62%	-1.23	-7.7	27
1995-10-22	Stabaek	D 2-2	72.1	1604	1540	56.19%	20.06%	23.75%	+0.72	-1.0	39
1995-10-22	@ Valerenga	D 2-2	72.1	1540	1604	23.75%	20.06%	56.19%	-0.72	+1.0	33

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	1995-09-02	9.05%	Strindheim	1385	6	@ Start	1663	4
2	1995-08-18	11.63%	Hamarkameratene	1518	2	@ Viking	1742	0
3	1995-05-07	12.49%	Hodd	1493	2	@ Start	1702	0
4	1995-09-10	12.64%	@ Stabaek	1516	2	Rosenborg	1845	1
5	1995-09-08	14.00%	@ Strindheim	1403	5	Viking	1710	3
6	1995-09-09	14.22%	Brann	1538	3	@ Lillestrom	1718	1
7	1995-10-08	14.41%	Stabaek	1540	1	@ Bodo Glimt	1717	0
8	1995-05-03	14.56%	Molde	1536	1	@ Lillestrom	1711	0
9	1995-07-16	14.86%	Valerenga	1560	3	@ Lillestrom	1730	1
10	1995-08-06	17.11%	@ Valerenga	1573	2	Rosenborg	1836	1
11	1995-10-08	17.48%	Hamarkameratene	1492	2	@ Start	1626	1
12	1995-04-22	17.53%	Molde	1469	6	@ Brann	1602	0
13	1995-06-02	17.69%	Molde	1570	3	@ Start	1702	1
14	1995-05-16	20.23%	Valerenga	1595	1	@ Start	1696	0
15	1995-08-27	21.00%	@ Stabaek	1502	2	Viking	1718	0
16	1995-07-16	22.03%	Start	1667	3	@ Viking	1749	1
17	1995-05-03	22.39%	@ Strindheim	1445	1	Tromso	1647	0
18	1995-04-29	24.08%	@ Molde	1528	5	Viking	1713	4
19	1995-08-26	24.50%	Bodo Glimt	1626	5	@ Start	1683	2
20	1995-09-09	25.17%	Bodo Glimt	1644	4	@ Tromso	1696	0
21	1995-06-25	25.70%	Molde	1574	2	@ Kongsvinger	1620	0
22	1995-05-21	26.80%	Bodo Glimt	1569	4	@ Valerenga	1606	0
23	1995-08-20	27.20%	Hodd	1493	2	@ Brann	1526	1
24	1995-10-01	27.44%	@ Hodd	1481	2	Start	1635	1
25	1995-05-14	27.99%	Molde	1553	2	@ Hamarkameratene	1580	1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1995-04-22	58.83	Molde	6	1469	17.53%	@ Brann	0	1602	63.59%	18.88%
2	1995-09-02	48.60	Tromso	7	1647	35.72%	@ Molde	0	1612	43.35%	20.93%
3	1995-08-27	39.17	@ Tromso	8	1608	50.92%	Kongsvinger	0	1586	28.51%	20.57%
4	1995-09-09	34.99	Bodo Glimt	4	1644	25.17%	@ Tromso	0	1696	54.59%	20.24%
5	1995-05-21	33.95	Bodo Glimt	4	1569	26.80%	@ Valerenga	0	1606	52.78%	20.42%
6	1995-05-06	33.60	@ Bodo Glimt	5	1543	38.33%	Hamarkameratene	0	1613	40.70%	20.97%
7	1995-05-03	28.18	@ Stabaek	4	1489	36.64%	Bodo Glimt	0	1571	42.40%	20.95%
8	1995-06-18	27.99	@ Hamarkameratene	5	1515	46.72%	Stabaek	0	1525	32.46%	20.82%
9	1995-10-01	27.18	Bodo Glimt	6	1690	54.05%	@ Hamarkameratene	0	1519	25.65%	20.30%
10	1995-05-03	24.83	@ Hodd	3	1469	29.25%	Valerenga	0	1608	50.12%	20.63%
11	1995-06-02	23.68	Viking	5	1697	52.92%	@ Hamarkameratene	0	1536	26.68%	20.40%
12	1995-06-11	23.55	Bodo Glimt	3	1596	32.07%	@ Molde	0	1588	47.13%	20.80%
13	1995-08-18	23.52	Hamarkameratene	2	1518	11.63%	@ Viking	0	1742	71.55%	16.82%
14	1995-05-21	23.44	@ Hodd	3	1501	32.33%	Kongsvinger	0	1615	46.86%	20.81%
15	1995-05-07	23.16	Hodd	2	1493	12.49%	@ Start	0	1702	70.31%	17.20%
16	1995-04-22	22.30	@ Viking	6	1690	59.83%	Bodo Glimt	0	1593	20.62%	19.55%
17	1995-06-25	22.02	Start	4	1660	47.95%	@ Brann	0	1537	31.29%	20.76%
18	1995-10-22	21.24	Hodd	5	1482	41.64%	@ Strindheim	1	1405	37.40%	20.96%
19	1995-04-21	20.38	@ Rosenborg	6	1746	62.09%	Kongsvinger	0	1628	18.74%	19.17%
20	1995-08-27	19.89	@ Stabaek	2	1502	21.00%	Viking	0	1718	59.37%	19.63%
21	1995-08-26	19.80	Bodo Glimt	5	1626	24.50%	@ Start	2	1683	55.34%	20.16%
22	1995-09-09	19.46	Brann	3	1538	14.22%	@ Lillestrom	1	1718	67.90%	17.88%
23	1995-07-16	19.24	Valerenga	3	1560	14.86%	@ Lillestrom	1	1730	67.03%	18.10%
24	1995-05-21	18.91	@ Stabaek	3	1509	43.08%	Brann	0	1545	35.98%	20.94%
25	1995-06-02	18.29	Molde	3	1570	17.69%	@ Start	1	1702	63.40%	18.92%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1995-06-25	81.7	@ Rosenborg	3	1826	70.26%	Bodo Glimt	3	1619	12.52%	17.22%
2	1995-04-30	79.2	@ Bodo Glimt	3	1571	29.05%	Lillestrom	3	1711	50.33%	20.61%
3	1995-04-29	77.3	@ Molde	5	1528	24.08%	Viking	4	1713	55.81%	20.10%
4	1995-09-30	76.7	@ Viking	2	1693	28.66%	Rosenborg	2	1837	50.76%	20.58%
5	1995-07-02	76.6	@ Molde	2	1592	19.55%	Rosenborg	2	1825	61.11%	19.34%
6	1995-08-20	75.3	@ Lillestrom	2	1734	72.33%	Stabaek	2	1500	11.11%	16.57%
7	1995-06-11	75.2	@ Lillestrom	2	1726	70.71%	Hamarkameratene	2	1513	12.21%	17.08%
8	1995-10-15	74.7	@ Viking	2	1690	64.40%	Molde	2	1548	16.89%	18.71%
9	1995-09-02	74.2	@ Bodo Glimt	2	1645	55.75%	Valerenga	2	1584	24.14%	20.11%
10	1995-06-18	74.1	@ Bodo Glimt	2	1619	48.01%	Kongsvinger	2	1620	31.23%	20.76%
11	1995-05-21	73.4	@ Tromso	2	1620	53.41%	Molde	2	1578	26.24%	20.36%
12	1995-08-27	73.2	@ Valerenga	2	1585	44.37%	Molde	2	1612	34.73%	20.91%
13	1995-08-20	72.7	@ Kongsvinger	2	1587	48.45%	Valerenga	2	1584	30.82%	20.73%
14	1995-09-02	72.6	Strindheim	6	1385	9.05%	@ Start	4	1663	75.54%	15.41%
15	1995-10-22	72.2	@ Kongsvinger	1	1535	13.89%	Rosenborg	1	1843	68.35%	17.76%
16	1995-08-06	72.1	@ Tromso	2	1614	58.94%	Brann	2	1525	21.37%	19.69%
17	1995-09-10	72.1	@ Stabaek	2	1516	12.64%	Rosenborg	1	1845	70.09%	17.27%
18	1995-10-22	72.1	@ Valerenga	2	1604	56.19%	Stabaek	2	1540	23.75%	20.06%
19	1995-09-08	72.0	@ Strindheim	5	1403	14.00%	Viking	3	1710	68.20%	17.80%
20	1995-10-15	71.6	@ Lillestrom	1	1706	48.25%	Bodo Glimt	1	1705	31.01%	20.74%
21	1995-06-28	71.5	@ Tromso	2	1609	60.29%	Stabaek	2	1507	20.23%	19.48%
22	1995-05-03	71.2	@ Brann	1	1539	18.85%	Rosenborg	1	1779	61.95%	19.19%
23	1995-08-06	71.1	@ Valerenga	2	1573	17.11%	Rosenborg	1	1836	64.12%	18.77%
24	1995-07-23	70.8	@ Valerenga	1	1579	27.60%	Viking	1	1732	51.91%	20.49%
25	1995-05-16	69.7	@ Brann	1	1544	27.45%	Lillestrom	1	1698	52.07%	20.48%

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1995-06-11	38.6	@ Stabaek	3	1513	58.83%	Strindheim	0	1425	21.46%	19.71%
2	1995-05-28	40.6	@ Lillestrom	3	1712	75.93%	Strindheim	0	1428	8.81%	15.26%
3	1995-07-16	40.7	@ Kongsvinger	5	1610	70.58%	Strindheim	1	1398	12.30%	17.12%
4	1995-09-24	41.1	@ Valerenga	9	1602	68.19%	Strindheim	2	1419	14.01%	17.80%
5	1995-07-30	41.2	@ Molde	4	1604	71.43%	Strindheim	1	1382	11.71%	16.86%
6	1995-09-24	42.4	@ Bodo Glimt	4	1679	68.62%	Hodd	0	1491	13.69%	17.69%
7	1995-07-30	43.3	@ Lillestrom	6	1711	69.59%	Hodd	0	1511	13.00%	17.41%
8	1995-04-30	43.4	Rosenborg	5	1767	68.37%	@ Strindheim	0	1458	13.88%	17.76%
9	1995-10-08	43.5	@ Tromso	1	1659	73.64%	Strindheim	0	1408	10.24%	16.12%
10	1995-06-18	44.5	@ Hamarkameratene	5	1515	46.72%	Stabaek	0	1525	32.46%	20.82%
11	1995-06-11	45.0	@ Viking	3	1721	69.36%	Hodd	0	1524	13.16%	17.48%
12	1995-10-22	45.1	Hodd	5	1482	41.64%	@ Strindheim	1	1405	37.40%	20.96%
13	1995-09-02	45.3	@ Rosenborg	9	1836	77.63%	Hamarkameratene	1	1527	7.80%	14.57%
14	1995-05-07	45.5	@ Brann	4	1540	58.49%	Strindheim	1	1456	21.75%	19.76%
15	1995-06-25	45.6	@ Viking	5	1720	64.75%	Valerenga	0	1574	16.62%	18.64%
16	1995-05-28	46.4	@ Rosenborg	6	1804	75.68%	Hodd	1	1524	8.96%	15.36%
17	1995-10-04	46.9	@ Rosenborg	2	1836	75.62%	Molde	0	1557	9.00%	15.38%
18	1995-04-22	47.3	@ Viking	6	1690	59.83%	Bodo Glimt	0	1593	20.62%	19.55%
19	1995-04-30	47.3	@ Tromso	4	1640	66.45%	Hodd	1	1476	15.31%	18.24%
20	1995-05-28	47.4	@ Viking	2	1691	66.45%	Stabaek	0	1528	15.31%	18.24%
21	1995-04-21	47.6	@ Rosenborg	6	1746	62.09%	Kongsvinger	0	1628	18.74%	19.17%
22	1995-05-21	47.6	@ Stabaek	3	1509	43.08%	Brann	0	1545	35.98%	20.94%
23	1995-10-01	47.7	Bodo Glimt	6	1690	54.05%	@ Hamarkameratene	0	1519	25.65%	20.30%
24	1995-06-02	48.2	Viking	5	1697	52.92%	@ Hamarkameratene	0	1536	26.68%	20.40%
25	1995-07-02	48.3	Kongsvinger	3	1602	57.12%	@ Strindheim	1	1406	22.94%	19.94%