1996 Tippeligaen Season

182 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

59 points · 11th Title

Last Title: 1995

Relegated

Start

18 pts

Valerenga · 28 pts

Moss · 29 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Moss

12.32 points above expected

29 points · 16.68 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Start

14.91 points below expected

18 points · 32.91 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Rosenborg Champion	26	18	5	3	59	82	26	+56	56.71	+2.29
2	Lillestrom	26	13	7	6	46	54	33	+21	47.00	-1.00
3	Viking	26	12	7	7	43	50	32	+18	44.64	-1.64
4	Brann	26	11	9	6	42	64	50	+14	39.74	+2.26
5	Tromso	26	11	8	7	41	46	41	+5	40.29	+0.71
6	Stabaek	26	9	9	8	36	47	45	+2	36.09	-0.09
7	Kongsvinger	26	9	7	10	34	38	48	-10	31.79	+2.21
8	Molde	26	9	6	11	33	45	38	+7	36.65	-3.65
9	Skeid	26	10	2	14	32	33	59	-26	22.42	+9.58
10	Bodo Glimt	26	9	4	13	31	44	49	-5	39.45	-8.45
11	Stromsgodset	26	8	5	13	29	40	59	-19	24.78	+4.22
12	Moss Relegated	26	7	8	11	29	28	47	-19	16.68	+12.32
13	Valerenga Relegated	26	6	10	10	28	30	40	-10	35.68	-7.68
14	Start Relegated	26	5	3	18	18	37	71	-34	32.91	-14.91

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Moss	29	16.68	+12.32
2	Skeid	32	22.42	+9.58
3	Stromsgodset	29	24.78	+4.22
4	Rosenborg	59	56.71	+2.29
5	Brann	42	39.74	+2.26

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Start	18	32.91	-14.91
2	Bodo Glimt	31	39.45	-8.45
3	Valerenga	28	35.68	-7.68
4	Molde	33	36.65	-3.65
5	Viking	43	44.64	-1.64

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Skeid	3	Jul 21 – Aug 18	1 in 187
2	Brann	5	May 19 – Jun 17	1 in 87
3	Bodo Glimt	4	Aug 3 – Aug 25	1 in 85
4	Rosenborg	7	May 27 – Jul 14	1 in 30
5	Molde	3	May 5 – May 12	1 in 22

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Bodo Glimt	5	May 5 – May 19	1 in 603
2	Molde	5	Aug 11 – Sep 8	1 in 274
3	Start	5	May 1 – May 16	1 in 169
4	Skeid	8	Aug 25 – Oct 20	1 in 129
5	Tromso	2	May 5 – May 9	1 in 47

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Moss	5	May 1 – May 16	1 in 603
2	Skeid	5	May 1 – May 16	1 in 123
3	Molde	7	May 5 – Jun 5	1 in 26
4	Valerenga	5	Jun 9 – Jul 21	1 in 22
5	Tromso	7	Aug 24 – Oct 20	1 in 21

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Bodo Glimt	9	May 1 – Jun 9	1 in 347
2	Lillestrom	6	Jul 14 – Aug 28	1 in 72
3	Rosenborg	4	May 9 – May 19	1 in 48
4	Molde	6	Aug 11 – Sep 15	1 in 27
5	Start	9	Jul 7 – Sep 8	1 in 20

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team	Elo	Season Pts	Elo Δ (5)	Points (5)	Expected (5)	Actual − Exp
Rosenborg	1891	59	+4	12	12.0	+0.0
Lillestrom	1765	46	+18	10	9.8	+0.2
Viking	1723	43	-10	12	9.8	+2.2
Brann	1698	42	+15	9	8.3	+0.7
Tromso	1710	41	+19	9	7.2	+1.8
Stabaek	1633	36	-14	7	6.5	+0.5
Kongsvinger	1605	34	+6	6	5.3	+0.7
Molde	1642	33	+2	6	6.9	-0.9
Skeid	1465	32	-34	0	4.5	-4.5
Bodo Glimt	1685	31	+38	6	5.5	+0.5
Moss	1441	29	+10	10	4.6	+5.4
Stromsgodset	1517	29	-4	3	4.5	-1.5
Valerenga	1620	28	-20	3	6.8	-3.8
Start	1536	18	-8	6	6.5	-0.5

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Team	BG	BRA	KON	LIL	MOL	MOS	ROS	SKE	STA	STA	STR	TRO	VAL	VIK
Bodo Glimt	—	0-0-2 2.79	1-0-1 3.47	1-0-1 2.42	1-0-1 2.96	2-0-0 4.54	0-0-2 1.48	1-0-1 4.30	0-0-2 2.94	0-2-0 3.15	1-1-0 3.89	0-0-2 2.67	1-1-0 3.04	1-0-1 2.16
Brann	2-0-0 2.71	—	1-1-0 3.32	0-2-0 2.15	1-1-0 2.83	0-1-1 4.32	0-1-1 1.41	1-0-1 3.82	1-0-1 3.13	2-0-0 2.88	2-0-0 3.74	0-1-1 2.68	1-1-0 2.83	0-1-1 2.34
Kongsvinger	1-0-1 2.03	0-1-1 2.17	—	0-1-1 1.76	1-0-1 2.28	1-1-0 3.89	1-0-1 1.12	0-1-1 3.70	1-0-1 2.36	1-0-1 2.55	1-1-0 3.31	0-1-1 2.03	1-1-0 2.38	1-0-1 1.66
Lillestrom	1-0-1 3.09	0-2-0 3.35	1-1-0 3.78	—	1-1-0 3.42	1-0-1 4.77	1-0-1 1.86	2-0-0 4.54	2-0-0 3.54	2-0-0 3.85	1-1-0 4.23	0-1-1 3.15	1-0-1 3.54	0-1-1 3.02
Molde	1-0-1 2.54	0-1-1 2.65	1-0-1 3.21	0-1-1 2.08	—	1-1-0 4.30	0-0-2 1.60	1-0-1 3.91	0-2-0 2.77	1-0-1 2.84	1-0-1 3.73	1-0-1 2.39	1-1-0 3.05	1-0-1 2.19
Moss	0-0-2 1.09	1-1-0 1.28	0-1-1 1.65	1-0-1 0.92	0-1-1 1.29	—	0-2-0 0.58	1-0-1 2.31	0-1-1 1.32	1-0-1 1.59	2-0-0 2.11	0-1-1 1.05	0-1-1 1.40	1-0-1 0.95
Rosenborg	2-0-0 4.09	1-1-0 4.16	1-0-1 4.52	1-0-1 3.66	2-0-0 3.95	0-2-0 5.20	—	2-0-0 4.92	1-1-0 4.16	1-0-1 4.42	2-0-0 4.82	2-0-0 3.86	2-0-0 4.17	1-1-0 3.71
Skeid	1-0-1 1.29	1-0-1 1.72	1-1-0 1.84	0-0-2 1.10	1-0-1 1.64	1-0-1 3.19	0-0-2 0.79	—	1-1-0 1.75	1-0-1 2.01	0-0-2 2.42	2-0-0 1.28	1-0-1 1.83	0-0-2 1.25
Stabaek	2-0-0 2.55	1-0-1 2.36	1-0-1 3.13	0-0-2 1.97	0-2-0 2.71	1-1-0 4.27	0-1-1 1.42	0-1-1 3.79	—	1-1-0 2.83	1-1-0 3.55	0-0-2 2.41	1-1-0 2.83	1-1-0 2.16
Start	0-2-0 2.34	0-0-2 2.63	1-0-1 2.94	0-0-2 1.69	1-0-1 2.66	1-0-1 3.95	1-0-1 1.21	1-0-1 3.51	0-1-1 2.68	—	0-0-2 3.43	0-0-2 2.25	0-0-2 2.77	0-0-2 1.82
Stromsgodset	0-1-1 1.67	0-0-2 1.80	0-1-1 2.18	0-1-1 1.36	1-0-1 1.81	0-0-2 3.39	0-0-2 0.88	2-0-0 3.06	0-1-1 1.97	2-0-0 2.07	—	2-0-0 1.51	0-1-1 1.95	1-0-1 1.27
Tromso	2-0-0 2.81	1-1-0 2.80	1-1-0 3.47	1-1-0 2.33	1-0-1 3.10	1-1-0 4.60	0-0-2 1.69	0-0-2 4.31	2-0-0 3.08	2-0-0 3.24	0-0-2 4.06	—	0-2-0 3.40	0-2-0 2.60
Valerenga	0-1-1 2.44	0-1-1 2.67	0-1-1 3.11	1-0-1 1.96	0-1-1 2.45	1-1-0 4.18	0-0-2 1.42	1-0-1 3.68	0-1-1 2.66	2-0-0 2.71	1-1-0 3.56	0-2-0 2.10	—	0-1-1 2.16
Viking	1-0-1 3.33	1-1-0 3.15	1-0-1 3.88	1-1-0 2.47	1-0-1 3.31	1-0-1 4.72	0-1-1 1.82	2-0-0 4.36	0-1-1 3.34	2-0-0 3.69	1-0-1 4.34	0-2-0 2.88	1-1-0 3.33	—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.74	+6.0
Allowed	0.64	-6.6
Differential	0.89	+4.1

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	6.04%	6.32%	4.12%	4.67%	2.20%	2.47%	25.82%
1	6.32%	6.04%	5.77%	3.30%	1.65%	1.92%	25.00%
2	4.12%	5.77%	8.24%	1.10%	1.92%	1.37%	22.53%
3	4.67%	3.30%	1.10%	3.85%	0.27%	0.27%	13.46%
4	2.20%	1.65%	1.92%	0.27%	0.55%	0.27%	6.87%
5+	2.47%	1.92%	1.37%	0.27%	0.27%	—	6.32%
Total	25.82%	25.00%	22.53%	13.46%	6.87%	6.32%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.75	1.75	+0.00
SD	1.64	1.64	2.51
CV	0.94	0.94	—
Max	10	10	+10
Min	0	0	-10

Games Played: 182

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.69%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	26.92%
1	3.85%	7.69%	7.69%	15.38%	—	—	34.62%
2	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
4	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
Total	11.54%	30.77%	23.08%	26.92%	7.69%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.69	1.88	-0.19
SD	1.78	1.18	2.45
CV	1.05	0.62	—
Max	7	4	+7
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	7.69%
1	—	7.69%	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	23.08%
2	19.23%	—	11.54%	—	—	—	30.77%
3	—	3.85%	—	15.38%	—	—	19.23%
4	7.69%	—	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	26.92%	19.23%	23.08%	19.23%	7.69%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.46	1.92	+0.54
SD	1.77	2.10	3.19
CV	0.72	1.09	—
Max	7	10	+6
Min	0	0	-10

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	—	3.85%	34.62%
1	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	23.08%
2	—	7.69%	11.54%	—	—	—	19.23%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%	11.54%
4	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	—	3.85%	—	3.85%
Total	23.08%	19.23%	34.62%	7.69%	3.85%	11.54%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.46	1.85	-0.38
SD	1.48	1.57	1.88
CV	1.01	0.85	—
Max	5	5	+3
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	—	19.23%
1	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	11.54%
2	11.54%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	26.92%
3	15.38%	11.54%	—	7.69%	—	—	34.62%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	38.46%	30.77%	15.38%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.08	1.27	+0.81
SD	1.41	1.61	2.28
CV	0.68	1.27	—
Max	5	7	+5
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	11.54%	11.54%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	—	42.31%
1	—	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
2	7.69%	—	—	—	3.85%	—	11.54%
3	7.69%	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	—	23.08%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	—	11.54%
Total	30.77%	30.77%	7.69%	23.08%	7.69%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.73	1.46	+0.27
SD	2.05	1.36	2.74
CV	1.18	0.93	—
Max	8	4	+8
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	7.69%	30.77%
1	19.23%	7.69%	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	42.31%
2	—	3.85%	15.38%	—	3.85%	—	23.08%
3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	26.92%	23.08%	30.77%	—	11.54%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.08	1.81	-0.73
SD	1.09	1.90	2.20
CV	1.01	1.05	—
Max	5	8	+3
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
1	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	11.54%
2	11.54%	11.54%	—	—	—	—	23.08%
3	7.69%	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	15.38%
4	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
5+	11.54%	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	—	23.08%
Total	50.00%	23.08%	11.54%	7.69%	7.69%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	3.15	1.00	+2.15
SD	2.36	1.30	2.74
CV	0.75	1.30	—
Max	10	4	+10
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	—	7.69%	26.92%
1	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	—	11.54%	34.62%
2	—	19.23%	—	7.69%	—	—	26.92%
3	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	3.85%	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	15.38%	34.62%	11.54%	19.23%	—	19.23%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.27	2.27	-1.00
SD	1.08	2.03	2.56
CV	0.85	0.89	—
Max	4	7	+3
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	23.08%
1	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	26.92%
2	—	3.85%	7.69%	—	7.69%	—	19.23%
3	—	—	7.69%	3.85%	—	—	11.54%
4	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	—	15.38%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	23.08%	23.08%	26.92%	11.54%	15.38%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.81	1.73	+0.08
SD	1.52	1.37	2.02
CV	0.84	0.79	—
Max	5	4	+5
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.69%	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	—	30.77%
1	—	3.85%	11.54%	—	7.69%	7.69%	30.77%
2	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	—	3.85%	3.85%	19.23%
3	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
4	—	—	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	7.69%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	7.69%	15.38%	30.77%	15.38%	15.38%	15.38%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.42	2.73	-1.31
SD	1.42	1.76	2.35
CV	1.00	0.64	—
Max	5	7	+5
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	26.92%
1	15.38%	7.69%	—	11.54%	—	—	34.62%
2	—	—	7.69%	—	3.85%	7.69%	19.23%
3	—	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	7.69%
4	—	3.85%	—	—	—	—	3.85%
5+	—	—	7.69%	—	—	—	7.69%
Total	15.38%	19.23%	23.08%	23.08%	7.69%	11.54%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.54	2.27	-0.73
SD	1.58	1.64	2.29
CV	1.03	0.72	—
Max	6	6	+4
Min	0	0	-5

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	15.38%
1	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	3.85%	23.08%
2	3.85%	7.69%	19.23%	—	3.85%	3.85%	38.46%
3	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	—	15.38%
4	—	7.69%	—	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	23.08%	34.62%	23.08%	7.69%	3.85%	7.69%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.77	1.58	+0.19
SD	1.14	1.45	1.83
CV	0.65	0.92	—
Max	4	5	+3
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	19.23%	3.85%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	3.85%	46.15%
1	3.85%	3.85%	7.69%	—	—	—	15.38%
2	—	3.85%	15.38%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
3	7.69%	—	—	—	—	—	7.69%
4	—	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	—	7.69%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	30.77%	15.38%	38.46%	7.69%	3.85%	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.15	1.54	-0.38
SD	1.32	1.45	2.06
CV	1.14	0.94	—
Max	4	6	+3
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 26

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.85%	7.69%	—	3.85%	—	3.85%	19.23%
1	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	3.85%	—	—	26.92%
2	—	7.69%	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	23.08%
3	11.54%	3.85%	—	—	—	—	15.38%
4	11.54%	—	—	—	—	—	11.54%
5+	3.85%	—	—	—	—	—	3.85%
Total	38.46%	30.77%	15.38%	11.54%	—	3.85%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.92	1.23	+0.69
SD	1.65	1.56	2.72
CV	0.86	1.27	—
Max	7	7	+7
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 26

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Rosenborg	1891	59	56.71	+2.29	67.0%	44	45	53	57	61	63	70
Lillestrom	1765	46	47.00	-1.00	47.0%	34	39	43	47	51	55	65
Viking	1723	43	44.64	-1.64	42.0%	30	35	40	44	49	55	56
Tromso	1710	41	40.29	+0.71	51.0%	21	29	35	41	46	50	53
Brann	1698	42	39.74	+2.26	61.0%	26	29	35	40	44	49	61
Bodo Glimt	1685	31	39.45	-8.45	9.0%	26	29	35	40	43	48	59
Molde	1642	33	36.65	-3.65	30.0%	21	28	32	37	41	47	56
Stabaek	1633	36	36.09	-0.09	54.0%	21	26	32	35	40	44	51
Valerenga	1620	28	35.68	-7.68	9.0%	21	26	32	36	39	43	49
Kongsvinger	1605	34	31.79	+2.21	69.0%	17	21	27	32	36	42	47
Start	1536	18	32.91	-14.91	0.0%	19	24	29	32	36	42	50
Stromsgodset	1517	29	24.78	+4.22	78.0%	9	15	21	24	28	34	41
Skeid	1465	32	22.42	+9.58	95.0%	11	14	19	22	25	32	38
Moss	1441	29	16.68	+12.32	98.0%	5	7	13	16	20	27	31

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 14.5% * Slight Edge: 14.5% to 17.5% * Clear Edge: 17.5% to 23% * Strong Edge: 23% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+15.93%

Slight Edge

45.60%24.73%29.67%

Elo Value

Home Edge

167 Elo

0.006 goals per Elo point

055.84500

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.62 goals

Home-Tilted

-2+0.34+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 7th * Longshot: 8th or lower.
Title Margin: Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.09 * Tight Race: 0.09 to 0.21 * Comfortable: 0.21 to 0.29 * Runaway: 0.29 and up.

Title-Race Openness

1.5

One-Team Race

134610

Champion Preseason Odds

81%

Rosenborg, 1st of 14

LongshotFavorite

Title Margin

Expected

0.50/gm

Runaway

00.280.8/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 4.73 * Some Luck: 4.73 to 7.1 * Lucky: 7.1 to 9.47 * Wild Swing: 9.47 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.35 * Close: 1.35 to 2.02 * Off: 2.02 to 2.69 * Way Off: 2.69 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 14 typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 14 * As Expected: 14 to 22.4 * Several Outliers: 22.4 to 30.8 * Many Outliers: 30.8 and up.
Unexpected Relegations: Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 0.54 * A Surprise: 0.54 to 0.86 * Several Surprises: 0.86 to 1.19 * Many Surprises: 1.19 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

6.79 points

Some Luck

05.9215

Average Finish Error

Expected

2.00

01.684

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 96.43%

98.00%

Moss

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 3.57%

0.00%

Start

050

Season Outliers

Expected

2 of 14

Minimal Outliers

01.47

Unexpected Relegations

Expected

2 of 3

Many Surprises

00.53

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.14 * Even: 0.14 to 0.16 * Top-Heavy: 0.16 to 0.19 * Lopsided: 0.19 and up.
Noll-Scully: Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.55 * Strong Separation: 1.55 to 1.75 * Wide Separation: 1.75 and up.
Interquartile Edge: Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 61.5% * Slight Edge: 61.5% to 65% * Clear Edge: 65% to 69.5% * Wide Edge: 69.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst: Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82% * Clear Edge: 82% to 87.5% * Strong Edge: 87.5% to 92.5% * Dominant: 92.5% and up.
Close Games: Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 53.5% * Some Drama: 53.5% to 58% * Frequent: 58% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts: Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16% * Occasional: 16% to 19% * Frequent: 19% to 25% * Very Frequent: 25% and up.

Gini Index

0.14

Even

00.140.5

Noll-Scully

Elo SD: 122.03

1.47

Moderate Separation

0.91.351.551.752.5

Interquartile Edge

71%

Wide Edge

50%61.5%69.5%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline 93%

93%

Dominant

50%100%

Close Games

Expected

52%

Few

0%45%100%

Blowouts

Expected

29%

Very Frequent

0%32%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.32 * Slight Separation: 0.32 to 0.34 * Notable Separation: 0.34 to 0.38 * Lopsided: 0.38 and up.
Strangeness: How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.28 * Some Carryover: 0.28 to 0.48 * Strong Carryover: 0.48 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23.5% * As Expected: 23.5% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 27.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 27.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19% * As Expected: 19% to 22% * Shaky Favorites: 22% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.63

Hard to Predict

00.582

Matchup Imbalance

0.40

Lopsided

00.320.380.5

Strangeness

Expected

1.43

Chaotic

01.002

Repeatability

0.45

Some Carryover

00.280.481

Upset Rate

Expected

28%

Very Upset-Prone

0%23%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

28%

Very Shaky

0%20%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.18 * Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.24 * Well Above Noise: 0.24 and up.

Probability calibration

0.15

Well Calibrated

0.010.050.10.51

Calibration slope

Ideal

0.52

Overconfident

0.3822051.001.6178

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.089

Well Within Noise

00.1190.3

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Rosenborg	81.00%	14.00%	3.00%	2.00%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Lillestrom	6.00%	39.00%	20.00%	14.00%	8.00%	8.00%	4.00%	1.00%	—	—	—	—	—	—
Viking	10.00%	22.00%	18.00%	18.00%	8.00%	9.00%	5.00%	5.00%	3.00%	—	2.00%	—	—	—
Brann	2.00%	4.00%	18.00%	19.00%	5.00%	11.00%	10.00%	10.00%	10.00%	8.00%	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%	—
Tromso	1.00%	9.00%	19.00%	13.00%	14.00%	7.00%	10.00%	8.00%	6.00%	7.00%	4.00%	2.00%	—	—
Stabaek	—	1.00%	4.00%	2.00%	17.00%	11.00%	13.00%	16.00%	16.00%	8.00%	5.00%	5.00%	2.00%	—
Kongsvinger	—	1.00%	1.00%	5.00%	3.00%	7.00%	6.00%	7.00%	13.00%	22.00%	18.00%	11.00%	4.00%	2.00%
Molde	—	1.00%	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	13.00%	20.00%	10.00%	10.00%	12.00%	7.00%	3.00%	1.00%	—
Skeid	—	—	—	—	—	—	1.00%	1.00%	2.00%	2.00%	11.00%	23.00%	35.00%	25.00%
Bodo Glimt	—	6.00%	9.00%	13.00%	18.00%	13.00%	10.00%	9.00%	9.00%	5.00%	6.00%	2.00%	—	—
Stromsgodset	—	—	—	—	—	1.00%	—	4.00%	6.00%	6.00%	16.00%	32.00%	29.00%	6.00%
Moss	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3.00%	1.00%	7.00%	24.00%	65.00%
Valerenga	—	3.00%	3.00%	2.00%	11.00%	14.00%	11.00%	20.00%	12.00%	10.00%	8.00%	3.00%	3.00%	—
Start	—	—	—	4.00%	6.00%	6.00%	10.00%	9.00%	13.00%	17.00%	21.00%	11.00%	1.00%	2.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team	Same level	Direct relegation
Lillestrom	100%	—
Rosenborg	100%	—
Viking	100%	—
Bodo Glimt	98.00%	2.00%
Brann	98.00%	2.00%
Tromso	98.00%	2.00%
Molde	96.00%	4.00%
Valerenga	94.00%	6.00%
Stabaek	93.00%	7.00%
Start	86.00%	14.00%
Kongsvinger	83.00%	17.00%
Stromsgodset	33.00%	67.00%
Skeid	17.00%	83.00%
Moss	4.00%	96.00%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
1996-04-13	Stromsgodset	L 2-3	59.4	1454	1525	34.78%	26.20%	39.03%	-0.09	-5.2	0
1996-04-13	@ Skeid	W 3-2	59.4	1525	1454	39.03%	26.20%	34.78%	+0.09	+5.2	3
1996-04-14	Valerenga	W 2-0	54.0	1721	1663	52.38%	24.48%	23.14%	+0.68	+7.8	3
1996-04-14	@ Lillestrom	L 0-2	54.0	1663	1721	23.14%	24.48%	52.38%	-0.68	-7.9	0
1996-04-14	Bodo Glimt	L 0-1	47.9	1422	1735	12.86%	18.74%	68.41%	-1.55	-2.2	0
1996-04-14	@ Moss	W 1-0	47.9	1735	1422	68.41%	18.74%	12.86%	+1.55	+2.2	3
1996-04-14	Molde	W 2-0	50.6	1802	1634	64.93%	20.30%	14.77%	+1.34	+5.0	3
1996-04-14	@ Rosenborg	L 0-2	50.6	1634	1802	14.77%	20.30%	64.93%	-1.34	-5.0	0
1996-04-14	Tromso	D 2-2	74.7	1706	1706	44.74%	25.80%	29.47%	+0.33	-0.4	1
1996-04-14	@ Viking	D 2-2	74.7	1706	1706	29.47%	25.80%	44.74%	-0.33	+0.4	1
1996-04-21	Start	D 3-3	79.3	1738	1681	52.11%	24.54%	23.35%	+0.67	-0.6	4
1996-04-21	@ Bodo Glimt	D 3-3	79.3	1681	1738	23.35%	24.54%	52.11%	-0.67	+0.6	1
1996-04-21	Skeid	L 1-2	65.6	1623	1449	65.64%	19.99%	14.37%	+1.38	-9.1	0
1996-04-21	@ Kongsvinger	W 2-1	65.6	1449	1623	14.37%	19.99%	65.64%	-1.38	+9.1	3
1996-04-21	Moss	W 8-0	39.7	1629	1420	69.19%	18.37%	12.45%	+1.59	+15.0	3
1996-04-21	@ Molde	L 0-8	39.7	1420	1629	12.45%	18.37%	69.19%	-1.59	-15.0	0
1996-04-21	Viking	D 1-1	69.4	1627	1705	33.68%	26.15%	40.17%	-0.14	+0.2	1
1996-04-21	@ Stabaek	D 1-1	69.4	1705	1627	40.17%	26.15%	33.68%	+0.14	-0.2	2
1996-04-21	Lillestrom	L 1-3	56.1	1530	1729	20.53%	23.55%	55.92%	-0.86	-6.1	3
1996-04-21	@ Stromsgodset	W 3-1	56.1	1729	1530	55.92%	23.55%	20.53%	+0.86	+6.1	6
1996-04-21	Brann	L 0-2	60.7	1655	1632	47.80%	25.38%	26.82%	+0.47	-14.0	0
1996-04-21	@ Valerenga	W 2-0	60.7	1632	1655	26.82%	25.38%	47.80%	-0.47	+14.0	3
1996-04-27	Molde	W 4-2	63.0	1682	1644	49.78%	25.03%	25.19%	+0.56	+6.6	4
1996-04-27	@ Start	L 2-4	63.0	1644	1682	25.19%	25.03%	49.78%	-0.56	-6.6	3
1996-04-28	Brann	D 3-3	79.3	1735	1646	56.11%	23.50%	20.39%	+0.87	-0.8	7
1996-04-28	@ Lillestrom	D 3-3	79.3	1646	1735	20.39%	23.50%	56.11%	-0.87	+0.8	4
1996-04-28	Tromso	L 0-1	46.9	1405	1706	13.49%	19.28%	67.23%	-1.47	-2.4	0
1996-04-28	@ Moss	W 1-0	46.9	1706	1405	67.23%	19.28%	13.49%	+1.47	+2.4	4
1996-04-28	Stabaek	W 4-2	58.9	1807	1627	66.21%	19.74%	14.05%	+1.41	+3.6	6
1996-04-28	@ Rosenborg	L 2-4	58.9	1627	1807	14.05%	19.74%	66.21%	-1.41	-3.7	1
1996-04-28	Bodo Glimt	L 1-3	52.1	1458	1737	14.80%	20.32%	64.88%	-1.34	-4.3	3
1996-04-28	@ Skeid	W 3-1	52.1	1737	1458	64.88%	20.32%	14.80%	+1.34	+4.3	7
1996-04-28	Kongsvinger	D 1-1	65.7	1524	1614	32.18%	26.06%	41.76%	-0.21	+0.3	4
1996-04-28	@ Stromsgodset	D 1-1	65.7	1614	1524	41.76%	26.06%	32.18%	+0.21	-0.3	1
1996-04-28	Valerenga	W 2-1	59.9	1705	1641	53.13%	24.30%	22.57%	+0.72	+3.8	5
1996-04-28	@ Viking	L 1-2	59.9	1641	1705	22.57%	24.30%	53.13%	-0.72	-3.8	0
1996-05-01	Stromsgodset	D 1-1	71.0	1741	1525	69.87%	18.04%	12.09%	+1.64	-2.1	8
1996-05-01	@ Bodo Glimt	D 1-1	71.0	1525	1741	12.09%	18.04%	69.87%	-1.64	+2.1	5
1996-05-01	Viking	D 1-1	69.6	1647	1709	36.02%	26.22%	37.76%	-0.04	+0.1	5
1996-05-01	@ Brann	D 1-1	69.6	1709	1647	37.76%	26.22%	36.02%	+0.04	-0.0	6
1996-05-01	Lillestrom	L 1-5	56.8	1614	1734	28.43%	25.65%	45.92%	-0.39	-14.8	1
1996-05-01	@ Kongsvinger	W 5-1	56.8	1734	1614	45.92%	25.65%	28.43%	+0.39	+14.8	10
1996-05-01	Skeid	L 0-1	62.3	1638	1454	66.62%	19.56%	13.82%	+1.44	-9.7	3
1996-05-01	@ Molde	W 1-0	62.3	1454	1638	13.82%	19.56%	66.62%	-1.44	+9.7	6
1996-05-01	Moss	D 2-2	69.0	1623	1402	70.27%	17.84%	11.88%	+1.66	-1.5	2
1996-05-01	@ Stabaek	D 2-2	69.0	1402	1623	11.88%	17.84%	70.27%	-1.66	+1.5	1
1996-05-01	Start	W 3-0	53.7	1709	1689	47.45%	25.43%	27.12%	+0.46	+13.1	7
1996-05-01	@ Tromso	L 0-3	53.7	1689	1709	27.12%	25.43%	47.45%	-0.46	-13.1	4
1996-05-01	Rosenborg	L 0-4	51.3	1637	1810	22.83%	24.39%	52.78%	-0.70	-14.7	0
1996-05-01	@ Valerenga	W 4-0	51.3	1810	1637	52.78%	24.39%	22.83%	+0.70	+14.7	9
1996-05-05	Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	67.9	1599	1739	26.21%	25.26%	48.53%	-0.50	+7.1	4
1996-05-05	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-2	67.9	1739	1599	48.53%	25.26%	26.21%	+0.50	-7.1	8
1996-05-05	Viking	L 0-4	59.7	1749	1709	50.08%	24.97%	24.95%	+0.58	-27.7	10
1996-05-05	@ Lillestrom	W 4-0	59.7	1709	1749	24.95%	24.97%	50.08%	-0.58	+27.7	9
1996-05-05	Valerenga	D 2-2	67.5	1404	1623	18.91%	22.83%	58.26%	-0.98	+1.0	2
1996-05-05	@ Moss	D 2-2	67.5	1623	1404	58.26%	22.83%	18.91%	+0.98	-1.0	1
1996-05-05	Brann	W 10-0	49.0	1825	1647	66.00%	19.83%	14.17%	+1.40	+21.5	12
1996-05-05	@ Rosenborg	L 0-10	49.0	1647	1825	14.17%	19.83%	66.00%	-1.40	-21.5	5
1996-05-05	Tromso	W 1-0	64.3	1464	1722	16.09%	21.22%	62.69%	-1.21	+9.3	9
1996-05-05	@ Skeid	L 0-1	64.3	1722	1464	62.69%	21.22%	16.09%	+1.21	-9.3	7
1996-05-05	Stabaek	L 1-2	68.2	1675	1622	51.82%	24.61%	23.57%	+0.66	-7.5	4
1996-05-05	@ Start	W 2-1	68.2	1622	1675	23.57%	24.61%	51.82%	-0.66	+7.5	5
1996-05-05	Molde	L 1-3	57.6	1527	1628	30.74%	25.94%	43.32%	-0.27	-8.6	5
1996-05-05	@ Stromsgodset	W 3-1	57.6	1628	1527	43.32%	25.94%	30.74%	+0.27	+8.6	6
1996-05-09	Lillestrom	L 1-3	66.2	1732	1722	46.17%	25.62%	28.21%	+0.40	-11.8	8
1996-05-09	@ Bodo Glimt	W 3-1	66.2	1722	1732	28.21%	25.62%	46.17%	-0.40	+11.8	13
1996-05-09	Moss	D 1-1	64.6	1626	1405	70.27%	17.84%	11.89%	+1.66	-2.1	6
1996-05-09	@ Brann	D 1-1	64.6	1405	1626	11.89%	17.84%	70.27%	-1.66	+2.1	3
1996-05-09	Kongsvinger	W 2-0	53.4	1637	1606	48.79%	25.21%	25.99%	+0.52	+8.7	9
1996-05-09	@ Molde	L 0-2	53.4	1606	1637	25.99%	25.21%	48.79%	-0.52	-8.7	4
1996-05-09	Skeid	D 1-1	66.2	1629	1473	63.75%	20.79%	15.46%	+1.27	-1.7	6
1996-05-09	@ Stabaek	D 1-1	66.2	1473	1629	15.46%	20.79%	63.75%	-1.27	+1.7	10
1996-05-09	Stromsgodset	L 0-1	66.1	1712	1518	67.70%	19.07%	13.23%	+1.50	-9.9	7
1996-05-09	@ Tromso	W 1-0	66.1	1518	1712	13.23%	19.07%	67.70%	-1.50	+9.8	8
1996-05-09	Start	W 1-0	59.6	1622	1668	38.23%	26.22%	35.55%	+0.06	+5.9	4
1996-05-09	@ Valerenga	L 0-1	59.6	1668	1622	35.55%	26.22%	38.23%	-0.06	-5.9	4
1996-05-09	Rosenborg	D 1-1	70.8	1737	1847	29.69%	25.82%	44.49%	-0.32	+0.5	10
1996-05-09	@ Viking	D 1-1	70.8	1847	1737	44.49%	25.82%	29.69%	+0.32	-0.5	13
1996-05-12	Molde	L 1-3	67.7	1720	1645	54.45%	23.96%	21.59%	+0.78	-13.5	8
1996-05-12	@ Bodo Glimt	W 3-1	67.7	1645	1720	21.59%	23.96%	54.45%	-0.78	+13.5	12
1996-05-12	Tromso	D 2-2	73.7	1598	1703	30.28%	25.89%	43.83%	-0.29	+0.3	5
1996-05-12	@ Kongsvinger	D 2-2	73.7	1703	1598	43.83%	25.89%	30.28%	+0.29	-0.3	8
1996-05-12	Rosenborg	W 3-0	59.8	1733	1846	29.34%	25.78%	44.88%	-0.34	+19.4	16
1996-05-12	@ Lillestrom	L 0-3	59.8	1846	1733	44.88%	25.78%	29.34%	+0.34	-19.4	13
1996-05-12	Viking	W 1-0	64.5	1407	1737	12.00%	17.95%	70.05%	-1.65	+10.1	6
1996-05-12	@ Moss	L 0-1	64.5	1737	1407	70.05%	17.95%	12.00%	+1.65	-10.1	10
1996-05-12	Brann	L 0-2	61.1	1662	1624	49.85%	25.02%	25.13%	+0.57	-14.5	4
1996-05-12	@ Start	W 2-0	61.1	1624	1662	25.13%	25.02%	49.85%	-0.57	+14.5	9
1996-05-12	Stabaek	D 2-2	70.8	1528	1627	30.95%	25.96%	43.09%	-0.26	+0.3	9
1996-05-12	@ Stromsgodset	D 2-2	70.8	1627	1528	43.09%	25.96%	30.95%	+0.26	-0.3	7
1996-05-13	Valerenga	W 2-1	63.5	1475	1627	24.84%	24.95%	50.21%	-0.58	+7.3	13
1996-05-13	@ Skeid	L 1-2	63.5	1627	1475	50.21%	24.95%	24.84%	+0.58	-7.3	4
1996-05-16	Skeid	L 1-2	66.8	1638	1482	63.75%	20.79%	15.46%	+1.27	-8.9	9
1996-05-16	@ Brann	W 2-1	66.8	1482	1638	15.46%	20.79%	63.75%	-1.27	+8.9	16
1996-05-16	Lillestrom	D 0-0	66.7	1659	1753	31.68%	26.03%	42.29%	-0.23	+0.4	13
1996-05-16	@ Molde	D 0-0	66.7	1753	1659	42.29%	26.03%	31.68%	+0.23	-0.4	17
1996-05-16	Moss	D 0-0	69.7	1827	1417	84.99%	9.76%	5.25%	+2.79	-3.1	14
1996-05-16	@ Rosenborg	D 0-0	69.7	1417	1827	5.25%	9.76%	84.99%	-2.79	+3.1	7
1996-05-16	Kongsvinger	W 5-0	49.8	1627	1598	48.66%	25.24%	26.11%	+0.51	+20.4	10
1996-05-16	@ Stabaek	L 0-5	49.8	1598	1627	26.11%	25.24%	48.66%	-0.51	-20.4	5
1996-05-16	Bodo Glimt	W 2-1	63.1	1702	1707	44.14%	25.86%	30.00%	+0.31	+4.9	11
1996-05-16	@ Tromso	L 1-2	63.1	1707	1702	30.00%	25.86%	44.14%	-0.31	-4.9	8
1996-05-16	Stromsgodset	W 3-0	47.0	1620	1528	56.51%	23.38%	20.11%	+0.89	+10.0	7
1996-05-16	@ Valerenga	L 0-3	47.0	1528	1620	20.11%	23.38%	56.51%	-0.89	-10.0	9
1996-05-16	Start	W 4-0	50.2	1727	1648	55.01%	23.81%	21.18%	+0.81	+13.7	13
1996-05-16	@ Viking	L 0-4	50.2	1648	1727	21.18%	23.81%	55.01%	-0.81	-13.7	4
1996-05-19	Stabaek	L 0-1	64.7	1702	1648	51.87%	24.60%	23.53%	+0.66	-8.0	8
1996-05-19	@ Bodo Glimt	W 1-0	64.7	1648	1702	23.53%	24.60%	51.87%	-0.66	+8.0	13
1996-05-19	Valerenga	W 1-0	58.4	1578	1630	37.35%	26.23%	36.42%	+0.02	+6.0	8
1996-05-19	@ Kongsvinger	L 0-1	58.4	1630	1578	36.42%	26.23%	37.35%	-0.02	-6.0	7
1996-05-19	Moss	W 2-0	42.5	1752	1420	79.77%	12.79%	7.44%	+2.33	+2.2	20
1996-05-19	@ Lillestrom	L 0-2	42.5	1420	1752	7.44%	12.79%	79.77%	-2.33	-2.2	7
1996-05-19	Tromso	W 3-0	56.3	1659	1707	38.01%	26.22%	35.77%	+0.05	+16.3	16
1996-05-19	@ Molde	L 0-3	56.3	1707	1659	35.77%	26.22%	38.01%	-0.05	-16.3	11
1996-05-19	Viking	L 1-2	55.7	1491	1741	16.63%	21.56%	61.80%	-1.17	-2.8	16
1996-05-19	@ Skeid	W 2-1	55.7	1741	1491	61.80%	21.56%	16.63%	+1.17	+2.8	16
1996-05-19	Rosenborg	W 2-1	70.2	1634	1824	21.31%	23.86%	54.83%	-0.80	+7.9	7
1996-05-19	@ Start	L 1-2	70.2	1824	1634	54.83%	23.86%	21.31%	+0.80	-7.9	14
1996-05-19	Brann	L 0-2	52.4	1518	1629	29.51%	25.80%	44.68%	-0.33	-9.7	9
1996-05-19	@ Stromsgodset	W 2-0	52.4	1629	1518	44.68%	25.80%	29.51%	+0.33	+9.7	12
1996-05-27	Kongsvinger	W 2-0	52.0	1639	1584	52.03%	24.56%	23.41%	+0.67	+7.9	15
1996-05-27	@ Brann	L 0-2	52.0	1584	1639	23.41%	24.56%	52.03%	-0.67	-7.9	8
1996-05-27	Start	W 1-0	59.8	1418	1642	18.52%	22.63%	58.85%	-1.01	+8.8	10
1996-05-27	@ Moss	L 0-1	59.8	1642	1418	58.85%	22.63%	18.52%	+1.01	-8.8	7
1996-05-27	Skeid	W 6-1	45.2	1816	1488	79.43%	12.98%	7.58%	+2.30	+4.4	17
1996-05-27	@ Rosenborg	L 1-6	45.2	1488	1816	7.58%	12.98%	79.43%	-2.30	-4.4	16
1996-05-27	Molde	D 3-3	78.1	1656	1676	41.98%	26.05%	31.97%	+0.22	-0.2	14
1996-05-27	@ Stabaek	D 3-3	78.1	1676	1656	31.97%	26.05%	41.98%	-0.22	+0.2	17
1996-05-27	Lillestrom	W 1-0	61.7	1691	1755	35.76%	26.22%	38.02%	-0.05	+6.2	14
1996-05-27	@ Tromso	L 0-1	61.7	1755	1691	38.02%	26.22%	35.76%	+0.05	-6.2	20
1996-05-27	Bodo Glimt	D 1-1	69.2	1624	1694	34.92%	26.20%	38.88%	-0.08	+0.1	8
1996-05-27	@ Valerenga	D 1-1	69.2	1694	1624	38.88%	26.20%	34.92%	+0.08	-0.1	9
1996-05-27	Stromsgodset	L 0-1	67.1	1744	1508	71.62%	17.17%	11.21%	+1.75	-10.3	16
1996-05-27	@ Viking	W 1-0	67.1	1508	1744	11.21%	17.17%	71.62%	-1.75	+10.3	12
1996-06-05	Brann	L 1-3	66.6	1694	1647	50.93%	24.80%	24.27%	+0.62	-12.8	9
1996-06-05	@ Bodo Glimt	W 3-1	66.6	1647	1694	24.27%	24.80%	50.93%	-0.62	+12.8	18
1996-06-05	Viking	W 3-1	66.3	1576	1733	24.34%	24.82%	50.84%	-0.61	+12.8	11
1996-06-05	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-3	66.3	1733	1576	50.84%	24.82%	24.34%	+0.61	-12.8	16
1996-06-05	Valerenga	W 2-0	53.4	1676	1624	51.53%	24.67%	23.80%	+0.64	+8.0	20
1996-06-05	@ Molde	L 0-2	53.4	1624	1676	23.80%	24.67%	51.53%	-0.64	-8.0	8
1996-06-05	Moss	W 2-1	48.4	1484	1427	52.20%	24.52%	23.28%	+0.68	+3.9	19
1996-06-05	@ Skeid	L 1-2	48.4	1427	1484	23.28%	24.52%	52.20%	-0.68	-3.9	10
1996-06-05	Rosenborg	L 0-1	51.5	1519	1820	13.49%	19.29%	67.22%	-1.47	-2.4	12
1996-06-05	@ Stromsgodset	W 1-0	51.5	1820	1519	67.22%	19.29%	13.49%	+1.47	+2.4	20
1996-06-05	Stabaek	W 1-0	56.7	1697	1655	50.29%	24.93%	24.78%	+0.59	+4.4	17
1996-06-05	@ Tromso	L 0-1	56.7	1655	1697	24.78%	24.93%	50.29%	-0.59	-4.4	14
1996-06-06	Start	W 3-0	50.0	1748	1633	59.24%	22.50%	18.26%	+1.03	+9.1	23
1996-06-06	@ Lillestrom	L 0-3	50.0	1633	1748	18.26%	22.50%	59.24%	-1.03	-9.1	7
1996-06-09	Molde	W 4-0	54.0	1660	1684	41.42%	26.09%	32.50%	+0.19	+19.8	21
1996-06-09	@ Brann	L 0-4	54.0	1684	1660	32.50%	26.09%	41.42%	-0.19	-19.8	20
1996-06-09	Stabaek	W 2-1	58.9	1757	1651	58.21%	22.84%	18.95%	+0.97	+3.2	26
1996-06-09	@ Lillestrom	L 1-2	58.9	1651	1757	18.95%	22.84%	58.21%	-0.97	-3.2	14
1996-06-09	Stromsgodset	W 5-2	55.1	1423	1516	31.74%	26.03%	42.23%	-0.23	+13.5	13
1996-06-09	@ Moss	L 2-5	55.1	1516	1423	42.23%	26.03%	31.74%	+0.23	-13.5	12
1996-06-09	Kongsvinger	W 3-0	46.5	1823	1588	71.52%	17.22%	11.26%	+1.74	+5.3	23
1996-06-09	@ Rosenborg	L 0-3	46.5	1588	1823	11.26%	17.22%	71.52%	-1.74	-5.3	11
1996-06-09	Skeid	L 1-2	66.2	1624	1487	61.58%	21.65%	16.77%	+1.15	-8.6	7
1996-06-09	@ Start	W 2-1	66.2	1487	1624	16.77%	21.65%	61.58%	-1.15	+8.6	22
1996-06-09	Tromso	D 2-2	73.8	1616	1702	32.80%	26.11%	41.09%	-0.18	+0.2	9
1996-06-09	@ Valerenga	D 2-2	73.8	1702	1616	41.09%	26.11%	32.80%	+0.18	-0.2	18
1996-06-09	Bodo Glimt	W 4-0	51.9	1721	1681	50.02%	24.99%	24.99%	+0.57	+16.0	19
1996-06-09	@ Viking	L 0-4	51.9	1681	1721	24.99%	24.99%	50.02%	-0.57	-16.0	9
1996-06-17	Stabaek	W 4-0	51.5	1680	1648	49.01%	25.18%	25.82%	+0.53	+16.4	24
1996-06-17	@ Brann	L 0-4	51.5	1648	1680	25.82%	25.18%	49.01%	-0.53	-16.4	14
1996-06-17	Kongsvinger	L 4-5	75.6	1615	1583	49.02%	25.17%	25.80%	+0.53	-6.5	7
1996-06-17	@ Start	W 5-4	75.6	1583	1615	25.80%	25.17%	49.02%	-0.53	+6.5	14
1996-06-30	Moss	W 4-1	45.8	1665	1436	71.01%	17.48%	11.52%	+1.71	+4.6	12
1996-06-30	@ Bodo Glimt	L 1-4	45.8	1436	1665	11.52%	17.48%	71.01%	-1.71	-4.6	13
1996-06-30	Start	L 0-2	57.5	1590	1609	42.13%	26.04%	31.84%	+0.22	-12.7	14
1996-06-30	@ Kongsvinger	W 2-0	57.5	1609	1590	31.84%	26.04%	42.13%	-0.22	+12.7	10
1996-06-30	Rosenborg	L 0-3	52.9	1664	1828	23.73%	24.65%	51.62%	-0.65	-11.7	20
1996-06-30	@ Molde	W 3-0	52.9	1828	1664	51.62%	24.65%	23.73%	+0.65	+11.7	26
1996-06-30	Brann	W 4-1	61.2	1631	1696	35.62%	26.22%	38.16%	-0.05	+14.4	17
1996-06-30	@ Stabaek	L 1-4	61.2	1696	1631	38.16%	26.22%	35.62%	+0.05	-14.4	24
1996-06-30	Skeid	W 1-0	49.4	1503	1496	45.65%	25.69%	28.66%	+0.38	+5.0	15
1996-06-30	@ Stromsgodset	L 0-1	49.4	1496	1503	28.66%	25.69%	45.65%	-0.38	-5.0	22
1996-06-30	Viking	D 2-2	74.8	1701	1737	39.83%	26.17%	34.00%	+0.12	-0.1	19
1996-06-30	@ Tromso	D 2-2	74.8	1737	1701	34.00%	26.17%	39.83%	-0.12	+0.1	20
1996-07-03	Rosenborg	L 1-5	57.1	1701	1839	26.39%	25.30%	48.31%	-0.49	-13.9	19
1996-07-03	@ Tromso	W 5-1	57.1	1839	1701	48.31%	25.30%	26.39%	+0.49	+13.9	29
1996-07-03	Lillestrom	W 2-1	68.4	1616	1761	25.74%	25.16%	49.10%	-0.53	+7.2	12
1996-07-03	@ Valerenga	L 1-2	68.4	1761	1616	49.10%	25.16%	25.74%	+0.53	-7.2	26
1996-07-07	Rosenborg	L 0-4	51.2	1670	1853	21.83%	24.05%	54.11%	-0.77	-14.1	12
1996-07-07	@ Bodo Glimt	W 4-0	51.2	1853	1670	54.11%	24.05%	21.83%	+0.77	+14.1	32
1996-07-07	Moss	W 2-1	48.8	1577	1432	62.56%	21.27%	16.17%	+1.21	+2.8	17
1996-07-07	@ Kongsvinger	L 1-2	48.8	1432	1577	16.17%	21.27%	62.56%	-1.21	-2.8	13
1996-07-07	Viking	W 3-0	58.0	1652	1737	32.93%	26.11%	40.96%	-0.17	+18.1	23
1996-07-07	@ Molde	L 0-3	58.0	1737	1652	40.96%	26.11%	32.93%	+0.17	-18.0	20
1996-07-07	Valerenga	D 0-0	65.4	1646	1624	47.73%	25.39%	26.88%	+0.47	-0.8	18
1996-07-07	@ Stabaek	D 0-0	65.4	1624	1646	26.88%	25.39%	47.73%	-0.47	+0.8	13
1996-07-07	Start	W 4-1	59.2	1508	1621	29.24%	25.77%	44.99%	-0.35	+16.4	18
1996-07-07	@ Stromsgodset	L 1-4	59.2	1621	1508	44.99%	25.77%	29.24%	+0.35	-16.4	10
1996-07-07	Brann	W 4-1	58.6	1687	1682	45.52%	25.70%	28.78%	+0.37	+11.6	22
1996-07-07	@ Tromso	L 1-4	58.6	1682	1687	28.78%	25.70%	45.52%	-0.37	-11.6	24
1996-07-10	Lillestrom	L 1-3	53.7	1491	1753	15.82%	21.04%	63.15%	-1.24	-4.6	22
1996-07-10	@ Skeid	W 3-1	53.7	1753	1491	63.15%	21.04%	15.82%	+1.24	+4.7	29
1996-07-14	Valerenga	D 2-2	73.9	1670	1624	50.78%	24.83%	24.38%	+0.61	-0.7	25
1996-07-14	@ Brann	D 2-2	73.9	1624	1670	24.38%	24.83%	50.78%	-0.61	+0.7	14
1996-07-14	Stromsgodset	D 3-3	80.2	1758	1524	71.50%	17.23%	11.27%	+1.74	-1.3	30
1996-07-14	@ Lillestrom	D 3-3	80.2	1524	1758	11.27%	17.23%	71.50%	-1.74	+1.3	19
1996-07-14	Molde	D 1-1	65.8	1429	1670	17.23%	21.93%	60.84%	-1.11	+1.5	14
1996-07-14	@ Moss	D 1-1	65.8	1670	1429	60.84%	21.93%	17.23%	+1.11	-1.5	24
1996-07-14	Tromso	W 2-1	57.5	1868	1699	65.05%	20.25%	14.70%	+1.35	+2.5	35
1996-07-14	@ Rosenborg	L 1-2	57.5	1699	1868	14.70%	20.25%	65.05%	-1.35	-2.5	22
1996-07-14	Kongsvinger	D 0-0	60.0	1486	1580	31.77%	26.03%	42.20%	-0.22	+0.4	23
1996-07-14	@ Skeid	D 0-0	60.0	1580	1486	42.20%	26.03%	31.77%	+0.22	-0.4	18
1996-07-14	Bodo Glimt	D 2-2	73.0	1605	1655	37.66%	26.22%	36.12%	+0.03	-0.0	11
1996-07-14	@ Start	D 2-2	73.0	1655	1605	36.12%	26.22%	37.66%	-0.03	+0.0	13
1996-07-14	Stabaek	L 2-3	74.1	1719	1645	54.30%	24.00%	21.70%	+0.78	-7.4	20
1996-07-14	@ Viking	W 3-2	74.1	1645	1719	21.70%	24.00%	54.30%	-0.78	+7.4	21
1996-07-21	Skeid	L 0-3	59.4	1655	1487	65.05%	20.25%	14.70%	+1.35	-26.2	13
1996-07-21	@ Bodo Glimt	W 3-0	59.4	1487	1655	14.70%	20.25%	65.05%	-1.35	+26.2	26
1996-07-21	Stromsgodset	W 3-0	47.1	1579	1526	51.82%	24.61%	23.57%	+0.66	+11.6	21
1996-07-21	@ Kongsvinger	L 0-3	47.1	1526	1579	23.57%	24.61%	51.82%	-0.66	-11.6	19
1996-07-21	Start	W 5-1	53.7	1669	1605	53.09%	24.31%	22.60%	+0.72	+12.1	27
1996-07-21	@ Molde	L 1-5	53.7	1605	1669	22.60%	24.31%	53.09%	-0.72	-12.2	11
1996-07-21	Rosenborg	D 4-4	82.8	1652	1870	18.99%	22.86%	58.15%	-0.97	+0.7	22
1996-07-21	@ Stabaek	D 4-4	82.8	1870	1652	58.15%	22.86%	18.99%	+0.97	-0.7	36
1996-07-21	Moss	D 2-2	73.1	1696	1431	74.38%	15.75%	9.87%	+1.93	-1.7	23
1996-07-21	@ Tromso	D 2-2	73.1	1431	1696	9.87%	15.75%	74.38%	-1.93	+1.7	15
1996-07-21	Viking	D 0-0	66.1	1625	1711	32.68%	26.10%	41.22%	-0.18	+0.3	15
1996-07-21	@ Valerenga	D 0-0	66.1	1711	1625	41.22%	26.10%	32.68%	+0.18	-0.3	21
1996-08-03	Bodo Glimt	L 2-4	60.8	1514	1629	29.02%	25.74%	45.24%	-0.36	-7.4	19
1996-08-03	@ Stromsgodset	W 4-2	60.8	1629	1514	45.24%	25.74%	29.02%	+0.36	+7.4	16
1996-08-04	Kongsvinger	D 0-0	67.9	1757	1591	64.76%	20.37%	14.87%	+1.33	-2.0	31
1996-08-04	@ Lillestrom	D 0-0	67.9	1591	1757	14.87%	20.37%	64.76%	-1.33	+2.0	22
1996-08-04	Stabaek	L 2-4	55.0	1432	1653	18.74%	22.74%	58.51%	-0.99	-5.0	15
1996-08-04	@ Moss	W 4-2	55.0	1653	1432	58.51%	22.74%	18.74%	+0.99	+5.0	25
1996-08-04	Valerenga	W 6-0	45.6	1869	1625	72.43%	16.76%	10.81%	+1.80	+9.6	39
1996-08-04	@ Rosenborg	L 0-6	45.6	1625	1869	10.81%	16.76%	72.43%	-1.80	-9.6	15
1996-08-04	Tromso	L 1-4	58.4	1593	1695	30.67%	25.93%	43.40%	-0.28	-12.2	11
1996-08-04	@ Start	W 4-1	58.4	1695	1593	43.40%	25.93%	30.67%	+0.28	+12.2	26
1996-08-04	Brann	W 3-0	52.7	1711	1669	50.27%	24.94%	24.79%	+0.59	+12.1	24
1996-08-04	@ Viking	L 0-3	52.7	1669	1711	24.79%	24.94%	50.27%	-0.59	-12.1	25
1996-08-11	Kongsvinger	W 5-3	63.9	1637	1593	50.54%	24.88%	24.58%	+0.60	+6.1	19
1996-08-11	@ Bodo Glimt	L 3-5	63.9	1593	1637	24.58%	24.88%	50.54%	-0.60	-6.1	22
1996-08-11	Rosenborg	D 3-3	80.3	1657	1879	18.67%	22.71%	58.62%	-1.00	+0.9	26
1996-08-11	@ Brann	D 3-3	80.3	1879	1657	58.62%	22.71%	18.67%	+1.00	-0.9	40
1996-08-11	Stromsgodset	L 0-1	64.9	1681	1507	65.65%	19.99%	14.36%	+1.38	-9.6	27
1996-08-11	@ Molde	W 1-0	64.9	1507	1681	14.36%	19.99%	65.65%	-1.38	+9.6	22
1996-08-11	Start	D 1-1	68.7	1658	1581	54.76%	23.88%	21.36%	+0.80	-1.1	26
1996-08-11	@ Stabaek	D 1-1	68.7	1581	1658	21.36%	23.88%	54.76%	-0.80	+1.2	12
1996-08-11	Skeid	L 2-4	72.3	1707	1513	67.63%	19.10%	13.27%	+1.50	-14.4	26
1996-08-11	@ Tromso	W 4-2	72.3	1513	1707	13.27%	19.10%	67.63%	-1.50	+14.4	29
1996-08-11	Moss	W 4-1	44.9	1616	1427	67.08%	19.35%	13.57%	+1.47	+5.5	18
1996-08-11	@ Valerenga	L 1-4	44.9	1427	1616	13.57%	19.35%	67.08%	-1.47	-5.5	15
1996-08-11	Lillestrom	D 2-2	75.0	1723	1755	40.32%	26.15%	33.53%	+0.14	-0.2	25
1996-08-11	@ Viking	D 2-2	75.0	1755	1723	33.53%	26.15%	40.32%	-0.14	+0.2	32
1996-08-17	Molde	W 1-0	60.7	1587	1671	32.92%	26.11%	40.97%	-0.17	+6.6	25
1996-08-17	@ Kongsvinger	L 0-1	60.7	1671	1587	40.97%	26.11%	32.92%	+0.17	-6.6	27
1996-08-17	Bodo Glimt	L 1-2	70.7	1755	1643	58.87%	22.62%	18.51%	+1.01	-8.3	32
1996-08-17	@ Lillestrom	W 2-1	70.7	1643	1755	18.51%	22.62%	58.87%	-1.01	+8.3	22
1996-08-18	Brann	W 2-1	64.9	1422	1658	17.59%	22.13%	60.28%	-1.08	+8.5	18
1996-08-18	@ Moss	L 1-2	64.9	1658	1422	60.28%	22.13%	17.59%	+1.08	-8.5	26
1996-08-18	Viking	W 2-1	58.0	1878	1723	63.62%	20.84%	15.53%	+1.27	+2.6	43
1996-08-18	@ Rosenborg	L 1-2	58.0	1723	1878	15.53%	20.84%	63.62%	-1.27	-2.6	25
1996-08-18	Stabaek	W 3-1	63.1	1527	1657	27.37%	25.48%	47.15%	-0.44	+12.0	32
1996-08-18	@ Skeid	L 1-3	63.1	1657	1527	47.15%	25.48%	27.37%	+0.44	-12.0	26
1996-08-18	Tromso	W 5-2	66.6	1516	1693	22.53%	24.29%	53.18%	-0.72	+16.2	25
1996-08-18	@ Stromsgodset	L 2-5	66.6	1693	1516	53.18%	24.29%	22.53%	+0.72	-16.2	26
1996-08-19	Valerenga	L 2-4	65.5	1582	1621	39.23%	26.19%	34.58%	+0.10	-9.3	12
1996-08-19	@ Start	W 4-2	65.5	1621	1582	34.58%	26.19%	39.23%	-0.10	+9.3	21
1996-08-24	Kongsvinger	W 2-1	58.3	1676	1593	55.40%	23.70%	20.90%	+0.83	+3.6	29
1996-08-24	@ Tromso	L 1-2	58.3	1593	1676	20.90%	23.70%	55.40%	-0.83	-3.6	25
1996-08-25	Start	W 7-1	50.7	1650	1572	54.72%	23.89%	21.39%	+0.80	+16.7	29
1996-08-25	@ Brann	L 1-7	50.7	1572	1650	21.39%	23.89%	54.72%	-0.80	-16.7	12
1996-08-25	Bodo Glimt	L 1-2	67.2	1665	1651	46.59%	25.56%	27.84%	+0.42	-6.9	27
1996-08-25	@ Molde	W 2-1	67.2	1651	1665	27.84%	25.56%	46.59%	-0.42	+6.9	25
1996-08-25	Lillestrom	W 7-2	54.2	1881	1747	61.32%	21.75%	16.93%	+1.14	+9.3	46
1996-08-25	@ Rosenborg	L 2-7	54.2	1747	1881	16.93%	21.75%	61.32%	-1.14	-9.4	32
1996-08-25	Stromsgodset	W 4-0	45.9	1645	1532	58.89%	22.62%	18.50%	+1.01	+12.0	29
1996-08-25	@ Stabaek	L 0-4	45.9	1532	1645	18.50%	22.62%	58.89%	-1.01	-12.0	25
1996-08-25	Skeid	W 3-0	47.6	1630	1539	56.39%	23.41%	20.19%	+0.88	+10.0	24
1996-08-25	@ Valerenga	L 0-3	47.6	1539	1630	20.19%	23.41%	56.39%	-0.88	-10.0	32
1996-08-25	Moss	W 1-0	45.3	1720	1430	76.44%	14.64%	8.92%	+2.08	+1.5	28
1996-08-25	@ Viking	L 0-1	45.3	1430	1720	8.92%	14.64%	76.44%	-2.08	-1.5	18
1996-08-28	Lillestrom	D 2-2	74.6	1666	1737	34.74%	26.20%	39.07%	-0.09	+0.1	30
1996-08-28	@ Brann	D 2-2	74.6	1737	1666	39.07%	26.20%	34.74%	+0.09	-0.1	33
1996-09-04	Tromso	L 1-3	64.2	1658	1680	41.71%	26.07%	32.22%	+0.20	-10.9	25
1996-09-04	@ Bodo Glimt	W 3-1	64.2	1680	1658	32.22%	26.07%	41.71%	-0.20	+10.9	32
1996-09-04	Stabaek	W 4-2	66.2	1590	1657	35.31%	26.21%	38.48%	-0.07	+9.2	28
1996-09-04	@ Kongsvinger	L 2-4	66.2	1657	1590	38.48%	26.21%	35.31%	+0.07	-9.2	29
1996-09-04	Molde	W 3-0	51.4	1737	1658	54.99%	23.82%	21.20%	+0.81	+10.5	36
1996-09-04	@ Lillestrom	L 0-3	51.4	1658	1737	21.20%	23.82%	54.99%	-0.81	-10.5	27
1996-09-04	Rosenborg	D 0-0	70.1	1429	1890	6.89%	12.07%	81.04%	-2.43	+2.9	19
1996-09-04	@ Moss	D 0-0	70.1	1890	1429	81.04%	12.07%	6.89%	+2.43	-2.9	47
1996-09-04	Brann	L 1-6	52.7	1529	1666	26.54%	25.32%	48.14%	-0.49	-17.2	32
1996-09-04	@ Skeid	W 6-1	52.7	1666	1529	48.14%	25.32%	26.54%	+0.49	+17.2	33
1996-09-04	Viking	L 0-3	51.1	1556	1722	23.51%	24.59%	51.90%	-0.66	-11.6	12
1996-09-04	@ Start	W 3-0	51.1	1722	1556	51.90%	24.59%	23.51%	+0.66	+11.6	31
1996-09-04	Valerenga	D 2-2	71.0	1520	1641	28.46%	25.66%	45.88%	-0.39	+0.4	26
1996-09-04	@ Stromsgodset	D 2-2	71.0	1641	1520	45.88%	25.66%	28.46%	+0.39	-0.4	25
1996-09-07	Bodo Glimt	W 1-0	57.7	1648	1647	44.83%	25.79%	29.38%	+0.34	+5.1	32
1996-09-07	@ Stabaek	L 0-1	57.7	1647	1648	29.38%	25.79%	44.83%	-0.34	-5.1	25
1996-09-08	Stromsgodset	W 6-2	51.6	1684	1521	64.42%	20.51%	15.07%	+1.31	+6.8	36
1996-09-08	@ Brann	L 2-6	51.6	1521	1684	15.07%	20.51%	64.42%	-1.31	-6.8	26
1996-09-08	Lillestrom	W 1-0	65.2	1432	1748	12.71%	18.61%	68.68%	-1.56	+10.0	22
1996-09-08	@ Moss	L 0-1	65.2	1748	1432	68.68%	18.61%	12.71%	+1.56	-10.0	36
1996-09-08	Start	W 2-1	52.3	1887	1544	80.56%	12.34%	7.09%	+2.39	+1.1	50
1996-09-08	@ Rosenborg	L 1-2	52.3	1544	1887	7.09%	12.34%	80.56%	-2.39	-1.0	12
1996-09-08	Molde	W 3-1	58.7	1691	1647	50.50%	24.89%	24.61%	+0.60	+7.2	35
1996-09-08	@ Tromso	L 1-3	58.7	1647	1691	24.61%	24.89%	50.50%	-0.60	-7.2	27
1996-09-08	Kongsvinger	D 0-0	65.1	1640	1599	50.19%	24.95%	24.86%	+0.58	-0.9	26
1996-09-08	@ Valerenga	D 0-0	65.1	1599	1640	24.86%	24.95%	50.19%	-0.58	+1.0	29
1996-09-08	Skeid	W 7-0	44.4	1733	1512	70.29%	17.83%	11.88%	+1.66	+12.5	34
1996-09-08	@ Viking	L 0-7	44.4	1512	1733	11.88%	17.83%	70.29%	-1.66	-12.5	32
1996-09-14	Rosenborg	L 0-2	47.2	1500	1888	9.43%	15.25%	75.32%	-2.00	-3.0	32
1996-09-14	@ Skeid	W 2-0	47.2	1888	1500	75.32%	15.25%	9.43%	+2.00	+2.9	53
1996-09-15	Valerenga	W 3-0	53.2	1642	1639	45.12%	25.75%	29.13%	+0.35	+13.9	28
1996-09-15	@ Bodo Glimt	L 0-3	53.2	1639	1642	29.13%	25.75%	45.12%	-0.35	-13.9	26
1996-09-15	Brann	D 2-2	73.5	1600	1690	32.15%	26.06%	41.79%	-0.21	+0.2	30
1996-09-15	@ Kongsvinger	D 2-2	73.5	1690	1600	41.79%	26.06%	32.15%	+0.21	-0.2	37
1996-09-15	Tromso	D 1-1	70.5	1738	1698	50.04%	24.98%	24.98%	+0.57	-0.8	37
1996-09-15	@ Lillestrom	D 1-1	70.5	1698	1738	24.98%	24.98%	50.04%	-0.57	+0.8	36
1996-09-15	Stabaek	D 0-0	65.6	1640	1653	43.01%	25.97%	31.03%	+0.26	-0.4	28
1996-09-15	@ Molde	D 0-0	65.6	1653	1640	31.03%	25.97%	43.01%	-0.26	+0.4	33
1996-09-15	Moss	W 5-0	39.7	1543	1442	57.62%	23.04%	19.35%	+0.94	+15.5	15
1996-09-15	@ Start	L 0-5	39.7	1442	1543	19.35%	23.04%	57.62%	-0.94	-15.5	22
1996-09-15	Viking	L 1-3	54.9	1514	1746	17.93%	22.32%	59.76%	-1.06	-5.3	26
1996-09-15	@ Stromsgodset	W 3-1	54.9	1746	1514	59.76%	22.32%	17.93%	+1.06	+5.3	37
1996-09-18	Molde	L 1-5	52.0	1497	1640	25.89%	25.19%	48.92%	-0.52	-13.7	32
1996-09-18	@ Skeid	W 5-1	52.0	1640	1497	48.92%	25.19%	25.89%	+0.52	+13.7	31
1996-09-28	Molde	D 0-0	65.4	1625	1653	40.83%	26.12%	33.05%	+0.17	-0.3	27
1996-09-28	@ Valerenga	D 0-0	65.4	1653	1625	33.05%	26.12%	40.83%	-0.17	+0.3	32
1996-09-29	Bodo Glimt	W 2-0	54.6	1690	1656	49.32%	25.12%	25.56%	+0.54	+8.6	40
1996-09-29	@ Brann	L 0-2	54.6	1656	1690	25.56%	25.12%	49.32%	-0.54	-8.6	28
1996-09-29	Skeid	W 1-0	48.8	1426	1483	36.72%	26.23%	37.05%	-0.01	+6.1	25
1996-09-29	@ Moss	L 0-1	48.8	1483	1426	37.05%	26.23%	36.72%	+0.01	-6.1	32
1996-09-29	Stromsgodset	W 5-0	41.6	1891	1509	83.28%	10.77%	5.95%	+2.63	+4.0	56
1996-09-29	@ Rosenborg	L 0-5	41.6	1509	1891	5.95%	10.77%	83.28%	-2.63	-4.0	26
1996-09-29	Tromso	L 0-2	58.8	1653	1699	38.36%	26.21%	35.43%	+0.06	-11.8	33
1996-09-29	@ Stabaek	W 2-0	58.8	1699	1653	35.43%	26.21%	38.36%	-0.06	+11.8	39
1996-09-29	Kongsvinger	W 1-0	52.8	1751	1600	63.16%	21.03%	15.81%	+1.24	+2.8	40
1996-09-29	@ Viking	L 0-1	52.8	1600	1751	15.81%	21.03%	63.16%	-1.24	-2.8	30
1996-10-01	Lillestrom	L 0-2	52.8	1559	1737	22.34%	24.22%	53.44%	-0.74	-7.6	15
1996-10-01	@ Start	W 2-0	52.8	1737	1559	53.44%	24.22%	22.34%	+0.74	+7.6	40
1996-10-13	Viking	W 7-0	58.3	1647	1754	30.07%	25.87%	44.06%	-0.31	+42.3	31
1996-10-13	@ Bodo Glimt	L 0-7	58.3	1754	1647	44.06%	25.87%	30.07%	+0.31	-42.3	40
1996-10-13	Rosenborg	W 4-3	80.6	1597	1895	13.70%	19.46%	66.84%	-1.45	+8.5	33
1996-10-13	@ Kongsvinger	L 3-4	80.6	1895	1597	66.84%	19.46%	13.70%	+1.45	-8.5	56
1996-10-13	Brann	D 3-3	78.3	1654	1699	38.45%	26.21%	35.34%	+0.07	-0.1	33
1996-10-13	@ Molde	D 3-3	78.3	1699	1654	35.34%	26.21%	38.45%	-0.07	+0.1	41
1996-10-13	Start	L 2-3	61.0	1477	1551	34.35%	26.18%	39.47%	-0.11	-5.2	32
1996-10-13	@ Skeid	W 3-2	61.0	1551	1477	39.47%	26.18%	34.35%	+0.11	+5.2	18
1996-10-13	Lillestrom	L 0-3	54.8	1641	1745	30.52%	25.92%	43.57%	-0.28	-14.4	33
1996-10-13	@ Stabaek	W 3-0	54.8	1745	1641	43.57%	25.92%	30.52%	+0.28	+14.4	43
1996-10-13	Moss	L 0-1	54.3	1505	1432	54.15%	24.04%	21.81%	+0.77	-8.2	26
1996-10-13	@ Stromsgodset	W 1-0	54.3	1432	1505	21.81%	24.04%	54.15%	-0.77	+8.2	28
1996-10-13	Valerenga	D 0-0	66.8	1711	1625	55.74%	23.60%	20.65%	+0.85	-1.3	40
1996-10-13	@ Tromso	D 0-0	66.8	1625	1711	20.65%	23.60%	55.74%	-0.85	+1.4	28
1996-10-20	Tromso	D 3-3	78.8	1699	1709	43.30%	25.94%	30.76%	+0.27	-0.2	42
1996-10-20	@ Brann	D 3-3	78.8	1709	1699	30.76%	25.94%	43.30%	-0.27	+0.2	41
1996-10-20	Skeid	W 5-0	41.7	1759	1472	76.19%	14.78%	9.03%	+2.06	+6.6	46
1996-10-20	@ Lillestrom	L 0-5	41.7	1472	1759	9.03%	14.78%	76.19%	-2.06	-6.6	32
1996-10-20	Kongsvinger	D 2-2	67.7	1440	1606	23.57%	24.61%	51.82%	-0.66	+0.7	29
1996-10-20	@ Moss	D 2-2	67.7	1606	1440	51.82%	24.61%	23.57%	+0.66	-0.7	34
1996-10-20	Bodo Glimt	W 2-0	50.1	1887	1690	67.95%	18.95%	13.10%	+1.52	+4.4	59
1996-10-20	@ Rosenborg	L 0-2	50.1	1690	1887	13.10%	18.95%	67.95%	-1.52	-4.3	31
1996-10-20	Stromsgodset	L 2-6	59.5	1556	1496	52.55%	24.44%	23.01%	+0.69	-20.4	18
1996-10-20	@ Start	W 6-2	59.5	1496	1556	23.01%	24.44%	52.55%	-0.69	+20.4	29
1996-10-20	Stabaek	L 2-3	70.4	1626	1627	44.66%	25.80%	29.54%	+0.33	-6.3	28
1996-10-20	@ Valerenga	W 3-2	70.4	1627	1626	29.54%	25.80%	44.66%	-0.33	+6.3	36
1996-10-20	Molde	W 3-0	52.0	1712	1654	52.35%	24.49%	23.17%	+0.68	+11.4	43
1996-10-20	@ Viking	L 0-3	52.0	1654	1712	23.17%	24.49%	52.35%	-0.68	-11.4	33

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	1996-05-27	11.21%	Stromsgodset	1508	1	@ Viking	1744	0
2	1996-05-12	12.00%	@ Moss	1407	1	Viking	1737	0
3	1996-09-08	12.71%	@ Moss	1432	1	Lillestrom	1748	0
4	1996-05-09	13.23%	Stromsgodset	1518	1	@ Tromso	1712	0
5	1996-08-11	13.27%	Skeid	1513	4	@ Tromso	1707	2
6	1996-10-13	13.70%	@ Kongsvinger	1597	4	Rosenborg	1895	3
7	1996-05-01	13.82%	Skeid	1454	1	@ Molde	1638	0
8	1996-08-11	14.36%	Stromsgodset	1507	1	@ Molde	1681	0
9	1996-04-21	14.37%	Skeid	1449	2	@ Kongsvinger	1623	1
10	1996-07-21	14.70%	Skeid	1487	3	@ Bodo Glimt	1655	0
11	1996-05-16	15.46%	Skeid	1482	2	@ Brann	1638	1
12	1996-05-05	16.09%	@ Skeid	1464	1	Tromso	1722	0
13	1996-06-09	16.77%	Skeid	1487	2	@ Start	1624	1
14	1996-08-18	17.59%	@ Moss	1422	2	Brann	1658	1
15	1996-08-17	18.51%	Bodo Glimt	1643	2	@ Lillestrom	1755	1
16	1996-05-27	18.52%	@ Moss	1418	1	Start	1642	0
17	1996-05-19	21.31%	@ Start	1634	2	Rosenborg	1824	1
18	1996-05-12	21.59%	Molde	1645	3	@ Bodo Glimt	1720	1
19	1996-07-14	21.70%	Stabaek	1645	3	@ Viking	1719	2
20	1996-10-13	21.81%	Moss	1432	1	@ Stromsgodset	1505	0
21	1996-08-18	22.53%	@ Stromsgodset	1516	5	Tromso	1693	2
22	1996-10-20	23.01%	Stromsgodset	1496	6	@ Start	1556	2
23	1996-05-19	23.53%	Stabaek	1648	1	@ Bodo Glimt	1702	0
24	1996-05-05	23.57%	Stabaek	1622	2	@ Start	1675	1
25	1996-06-05	24.27%	Brann	1647	3	@ Bodo Glimt	1694	1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1996-10-13	42.31	@ Bodo Glimt	7	1647	30.07%	Viking	0	1754	44.06%	25.87%
2	1996-05-05	27.67	Viking	4	1709	24.95%	@ Lillestrom	0	1749	50.08%	24.97%
3	1996-07-21	26.18	Skeid	3	1487	14.70%	@ Bodo Glimt	0	1655	65.05%	20.25%
4	1996-05-05	21.49	@ Rosenborg	10	1825	66.00%	Brann	0	1647	14.17%	19.83%
5	1996-05-16	20.42	@ Stabaek	5	1627	48.66%	Kongsvinger	0	1598	26.11%	25.24%
6	1996-10-20	20.36	Stromsgodset	6	1496	23.01%	@ Start	2	1556	52.55%	24.44%
7	1996-06-09	19.81	@ Brann	4	1660	41.42%	Molde	0	1684	32.50%	26.09%
8	1996-05-12	19.40	@ Lillestrom	3	1733	29.34%	Rosenborg	0	1846	44.88%	25.78%
9	1996-07-07	18.06	@ Molde	3	1652	32.93%	Viking	0	1737	40.96%	26.11%
10	1996-09-04	17.15	Brann	6	1666	48.14%	@ Skeid	1	1529	26.54%	25.32%
11	1996-08-25	16.71	@ Brann	7	1650	54.72%	Start	1	1572	21.39%	23.89%
12	1996-06-17	16.41	@ Brann	4	1680	49.01%	Stabaek	0	1648	25.82%	25.18%
13	1996-07-07	16.39	@ Stromsgodset	4	1508	29.24%	Start	1	1621	44.99%	25.77%
14	1996-05-19	16.31	@ Molde	3	1659	38.01%	Tromso	0	1707	35.77%	26.22%
15	1996-08-18	16.25	@ Stromsgodset	5	1516	22.53%	Tromso	2	1693	53.18%	24.29%
16	1996-06-09	15.96	@ Viking	4	1721	50.02%	Bodo Glimt	0	1681	24.99%	24.99%
17	1996-09-15	15.47	@ Start	5	1543	57.62%	Moss	0	1442	19.35%	23.04%
18	1996-04-21	14.96	@ Molde	8	1629	69.19%	Moss	0	1420	12.45%	18.37%
19	1996-05-01	14.83	Lillestrom	5	1734	45.92%	@ Kongsvinger	1	1614	28.43%	25.65%
20	1996-05-01	14.71	Rosenborg	4	1810	52.78%	@ Valerenga	0	1637	22.83%	24.39%
21	1996-05-12	14.53	Brann	2	1624	25.13%	@ Start	0	1662	49.85%	25.02%
22	1996-06-30	14.43	@ Stabaek	4	1631	35.62%	Brann	1	1696	38.16%	26.22%
23	1996-10-13	14.43	Lillestrom	3	1745	43.57%	@ Stabaek	0	1641	30.52%	25.92%
24	1996-08-11	14.38	Skeid	4	1513	13.27%	@ Tromso	2	1707	67.63%	19.10%
25	1996-07-07	14.12	Rosenborg	4	1853	54.11%	@ Bodo Glimt	0	1670	21.83%	24.05%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1996-07-21	82.8	@ Stabaek	4	1652	18.99%	Rosenborg	4	1870	58.15%	22.86%
2	1996-10-13	80.6	@ Kongsvinger	4	1597	13.70%	Rosenborg	3	1895	66.84%	19.46%
3	1996-08-11	80.3	@ Brann	3	1657	18.67%	Rosenborg	3	1879	58.62%	22.71%
4	1996-07-14	80.2	@ Lillestrom	3	1758	71.50%	Stromsgodset	3	1524	11.27%	17.23%
5	1996-04-21	79.3	@ Bodo Glimt	3	1738	52.11%	Start	3	1681	23.35%	24.54%
6	1996-04-28	79.3	@ Lillestrom	3	1735	56.11%	Brann	3	1646	20.39%	23.50%
7	1996-10-20	78.8	@ Brann	3	1699	43.30%	Tromso	3	1709	30.76%	25.94%
8	1996-10-13	78.3	@ Molde	3	1654	38.45%	Brann	3	1699	35.34%	26.21%
9	1996-05-27	78.1	@ Stabaek	3	1656	41.98%	Molde	3	1676	31.97%	26.05%
10	1996-06-17	75.6	Kongsvinger	5	1583	25.80%	@ Start	4	1615	49.02%	25.17%
11	1996-08-11	75.0	@ Viking	2	1723	40.32%	Lillestrom	2	1755	33.53%	26.15%
12	1996-06-30	74.8	@ Tromso	2	1701	39.83%	Viking	2	1737	34.00%	26.17%
13	1996-04-14	74.7	@ Viking	2	1706	44.74%	Tromso	2	1706	29.47%	25.80%
14	1996-08-28	74.6	@ Brann	2	1666	34.74%	Lillestrom	2	1737	39.07%	26.20%
15	1996-07-14	74.1	Stabaek	3	1645	21.70%	@ Viking	2	1719	54.30%	24.00%
16	1996-07-14	73.9	@ Brann	2	1670	50.78%	Valerenga	2	1624	24.38%	24.83%
17	1996-06-09	73.8	@ Valerenga	2	1616	32.80%	Tromso	2	1702	41.09%	26.11%
18	1996-05-12	73.7	@ Kongsvinger	2	1598	30.28%	Tromso	2	1703	43.83%	25.89%
19	1996-09-15	73.5	@ Kongsvinger	2	1600	32.15%	Brann	2	1690	41.79%	26.06%
20	1996-07-21	73.1	@ Tromso	2	1696	74.38%	Moss	2	1431	9.87%	15.75%
21	1996-07-14	73.0	@ Start	2	1605	37.66%	Bodo Glimt	2	1655	36.12%	26.22%
22	1996-08-11	72.3	Skeid	4	1513	13.27%	@ Tromso	2	1707	67.63%	19.10%
23	1996-05-01	71.0	@ Bodo Glimt	1	1741	69.87%	Stromsgodset	1	1525	12.09%	18.04%
24	1996-09-04	71.0	@ Stromsgodset	2	1520	28.46%	Valerenga	2	1641	45.88%	25.66%
25	1996-05-09	70.8	@ Viking	1	1737	29.69%	Rosenborg	1	1847	44.49%	25.82%

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	1996-04-21	39.7	@ Molde	8	1629	69.19%	Moss	0	1420	12.45%	18.37%
2	1996-09-15	39.7	@ Start	5	1543	57.62%	Moss	0	1442	19.35%	23.04%
3	1996-09-29	41.6	@ Rosenborg	5	1891	83.28%	Stromsgodset	0	1509	5.95%	10.77%
4	1996-10-20	41.7	@ Lillestrom	5	1759	76.19%	Skeid	0	1472	9.03%	14.78%
5	1996-05-19	42.5	@ Lillestrom	2	1752	79.77%	Moss	0	1420	7.44%	12.79%
6	1996-09-08	44.4	@ Viking	7	1733	70.29%	Skeid	0	1512	11.88%	17.83%
7	1996-08-11	44.9	@ Valerenga	4	1616	67.08%	Moss	1	1427	13.57%	19.35%
8	1996-05-27	45.2	@ Rosenborg	6	1816	79.43%	Skeid	1	1488	7.58%	12.98%
9	1996-08-25	45.3	@ Viking	1	1720	76.44%	Moss	0	1430	8.92%	14.64%
10	1996-08-04	45.6	@ Rosenborg	6	1869	72.43%	Valerenga	0	1625	10.81%	16.76%
11	1996-06-30	45.8	@ Bodo Glimt	4	1665	71.01%	Moss	1	1436	11.52%	17.48%
12	1996-08-25	45.9	@ Stabaek	4	1645	58.89%	Stromsgodset	0	1532	18.50%	22.62%
13	1996-06-09	46.5	@ Rosenborg	3	1823	71.52%	Kongsvinger	0	1588	11.26%	17.22%
14	1996-04-28	46.9	Tromso	1	1706	67.23%	@ Moss	0	1405	13.49%	19.28%
15	1996-05-16	47.0	@ Valerenga	3	1620	56.51%	Stromsgodset	0	1528	20.11%	23.38%
16	1996-07-21	47.1	@ Kongsvinger	3	1579	51.82%	Stromsgodset	0	1526	23.57%	24.61%
17	1996-09-14	47.2	Rosenborg	2	1888	75.32%	@ Skeid	0	1500	9.43%	15.25%
18	1996-08-25	47.6	@ Valerenga	3	1630	56.39%	Skeid	0	1539	20.19%	23.41%
19	1996-04-14	47.9	Bodo Glimt	1	1735	68.41%	@ Moss	0	1422	12.86%	18.74%
20	1996-06-05	48.4	@ Skeid	2	1484	52.20%	Moss	1	1427	23.28%	24.52%
21	1996-07-07	48.8	@ Kongsvinger	2	1577	62.56%	Moss	1	1432	16.17%	21.27%
22	1996-09-29	48.8	@ Moss	1	1426	36.72%	Skeid	0	1483	37.05%	26.23%
23	1996-05-05	49.0	@ Rosenborg	10	1825	66.00%	Brann	0	1647	14.17%	19.83%
24	1996-06-30	49.4	@ Stromsgodset	1	1503	45.65%	Skeid	0	1496	28.66%	25.69%
25	1996-05-16	49.8	@ Stabaek	5	1627	48.66%	Kongsvinger	0	1598	26.11%	25.24%