Home / Leagues / Estonia / Meistriliiga / 1992-93
‹ ›

1992-93 Meistriliiga Season

132 games

Final

Champion

Norma Tallinn

42 points · 2nd Title

Last Title: 1992

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Norma Tallinn

6.76 points above expected

42 points · 35.24 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

DAG Tartu

5.37 points below expected

13 points · 18.37 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Norma Tallinn Champion 22 20 2 0 42 102 16 +86 35.24 +6.76
2 Flora 22 15 4 3 34 63 13 +50 30.28 +3.72
3 Nikol Tallinn 22 15 3 4 33 58 17 +41 31.11 +1.89
4 Polevkivi Johvi 22 13 6 3 32 51 20 +31 30.54 +1.46
5 Vigri Tallinn 22 10 7 5 27 61 31 +30 26.77 +0.23
6 Narva Trans 22 11 2 9 24 51 34 +17 21.10 +2.90
7 Keemik 22 7 4 11 18 30 56 -26 19.27 -1.27
8 Tallinna Dnamo 22 4 5 13 13 24 50 -26 16.77 -3.77
9 DAG Tartu 22 5 3 14 13 30 75 -45 18.37 -5.37
10 Merkuur 22 4 4 14 12 17 63 -46 12.37 -0.37
11 Sillame Kalev 22 4 1 17 9 17 65 -48 12.46 -3.46
12 Tulevik Viljandi 22 3 1 18 7 24 88 -64 9.72 -2.72

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Norma Tallinn 42 35.24 +6.76
2 Flora 34 30.28 +3.72
3 Narva Trans 24 21.10 +2.90
4 Nikol Tallinn 33 31.11 +1.89
5 Polevkivi Johvi 32 30.54 +1.46

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 DAG Tartu 13 18.37 -5.37
2 Tallinna Dnamo 13 16.77 -3.77
3 Sillame Kalev 9 12.46 -3.46
4 Tulevik Viljandi 7 9.72 -2.72
5 Keemik 18 19.27 -1.27

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Norma Tallinn 10 Aug 22 – Apr 30 1 in 43
2 Narva Trans 5 Sep 12 – Oct 10 1 in 22
3 Polevkivi Johvi 6 Aug 29 – Oct 3 1 in 13
4 Nikol Tallinn 6 Aug 1 – Sep 5 1 in 12
5 Tulevik Viljandi 2 May 1 – May 8 1 in 8

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 DAG Tartu 5 Aug 1 – Sep 5 1 in 82
2 Sillame Kalev 9 Oct 10 – Jun 15 1 in 63
3 Vigri Tallinn 3 Jun 19 – Jun 26 1 in 61
4 Polevkivi Johvi 2 Jun 19 – Jun 22 1 in 31
5 Tulevik Viljandi 10 Aug 1 – Oct 2 1 in 29

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Polevkivi Johvi 14 Aug 1 – May 15 1 in 49
2 Vigri Tallinn 9 Aug 8 – Sep 26 1 in 45
3 Norma Tallinn 22 Aug 1 – Jun 26 1 in 23
4 Merkuur 2 May 15 – May 22 1 in 14
5 Flora 9 Sep 26 – Jun 7 1 in 13

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Tallinna Dnamo 14 Aug 8 – May 22 1 in 247
2 Polevkivi Johvi 2 Jun 6 – Jun 12 1 in 17
3 Vigri Tallinn 5 Oct 3 – May 15 1 in 14
4 Merkuur 11 Aug 15 – May 8 1 in 12
5 Narva Trans 6 May 1 – Jun 7 1 in 8

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Norma Tallinn 1450 42 +46 10 8.2 +1.8
Flora 1303 34 +36 8 6.9 +1.1
Nikol Tallinn 1253 33 -11 6 6.3 -0.3
Polevkivi Johvi 1171 32 -59 5 7.1 -2.1
Vigri Tallinn 1111 27 -45 4 6.4 -2.4
Narva Trans 1064 24 +120 10 7.0 +3.0
Keemik 883 18 +3 4 3.0 +1.0
Tallinna Dnamo 889 13 +71 4 3.0 +1.0
DAG Tartu 792 13 -85 2 4.7 -2.7
Merkuur 671 12 -14 5 3.4 +1.6
Sillame Kalev 610 9 +5 2 2.0 +0.0
Tulevik Viljandi 697 7 -66 0 2.2 -2.2

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team DT FLO KEE MER NT NT NT PJ SK TD TV VT
DAG Tartu —
1-0-1
1.19
0-0-2
3.14
1-0-1
3.87
0-0-2
2.41
0-1-1
1.11
0-0-2
0.86
0-1-1
0.96
1-0-1
3.65
1-0-1
3.10
1-1-0
4.21
0-0-2
2.14
Flora
1-0-1
4.48
 —
2-0-0
4.59
2-0-0
5.08
2-0-0
4.48
1-1-0
2.71
0-0-2
1.91
1-1-0
2.49
2-0-0
4.58
2-0-0
5.07
2-0-0
5.12
0-2-0
3.18
Keemik
2-0-0
2.53
0-0-2
1.08
 —
0-2-0
4.11
0-0-2
2.22
0-0-2
1.30
0-0-2
0.66
1-0-1
1.08
2-0-0
3.68
0-2-0
3.34
2-0-0
3.90
0-0-2
1.77
Merkuur
1-0-1
1.79
0-0-2
0.60
0-2-0
1.55
 —
1-0-1
1.34
0-0-2
0.71
0-0-2
0.53
0-1-1
0.71
1-0-1
3.05
0-1-1
2.16
1-0-1
3.21
0-0-2
0.74
Narva Trans
2-0-0
3.25
0-0-2
1.19
2-0-0
3.44
1-0-1
4.33
 —
0-0-2
1.35
0-0-2
0.85
0-0-2
1.26
2-0-0
4.21
2-0-0
3.75
2-0-0
4.53
0-2-0
1.97
Nikol Tallinn
1-1-0
4.56
0-1-1
2.95
2-0-0
4.37
2-0-0
4.98
2-0-0
4.32
 —
0-0-2
1.92
1-0-1
3.24
2-0-0
5.09
2-0-0
4.48
2-0-0
5.17
1-1-0
3.36
Norma Tallinn
2-0-0
4.82
2-0-0
3.76
2-0-0
5.02
2-0-0
5.16
2-0-0
4.83
2-0-0
3.75
 —
0-2-0
3.58
2-0-0
5.26
2-0-0
5.05
2-0-0
5.25
2-0-0
4.38
Polevkivi Johvi
1-1-0
4.71
0-1-1
3.17
1-0-1
4.60
1-1-0
4.97
2-0-0
4.41
1-0-1
2.43
0-2-0
2.08
 —
2-0-0
4.86
2-0-0
4.68
2-0-0
5.11
1-1-0
3.40
Sillame Kalev
1-0-1
2.02
0-0-2
1.10
0-0-2
1.98
1-0-1
2.62
0-0-2
1.46
0-0-2
0.61
0-0-2
0.46
0-0-2
0.81
 —
0-1-1
2.42
1-0-1
3.49
1-0-1
0.57
Tallinna Dnamo
1-0-1
2.57
0-0-2
0.61
0-2-0
2.32
1-1-0
3.51
0-0-2
1.92
0-0-2
1.20
0-0-2
0.63
0-0-2
1.00
1-1-0
3.24
 —
1-0-1
4.05
0-1-1
1.53
Tulevik Viljandi
0-1-1
1.45
0-0-2
0.57
0-0-2
1.77
1-0-1
2.46
0-0-2
1.14
0-0-2
0.52
0-0-2
0.45
0-0-2
0.58
1-0-1
2.18
1-0-1
1.62
 —
0-0-2
0.90
Vigri Tallinn
2-0-0
3.53
0-2-0
2.48
2-0-0
3.90
2-0-0
4.94
0-2-0
3.70
0-1-1
2.30
0-0-2
1.29
0-1-1
2.26
1-0-1
5.11
1-1-0
4.14
2-0-0
4.78
 —

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.88 +4.3
Allowed 0.89 -4.2
Differential 0.98 +2.4

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
05.30%5.30%4.55%2.65%4.17%6.06%28.03%
15.30%8.33%3.41%4.92%1.52%3.03%26.52%
24.55%3.41%2.27%3.03%0.76%1.14%15.15%
32.65%4.92%3.03%—0.76%0.38%11.74%
44.17%1.52%0.76%0.76%—0.38%7.58%
5+6.06%3.03%1.14%0.38%0.38%—10.98%
Total28.03%26.52%15.15%11.74%7.58%10.98%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.00 2.00 +0.00
SD 2.36 2.36 3.78
CV 1.18 1.18 —
Max 19 19 +19
Min 0 0 -19

Games Played: 132

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%——4.55%—9.09%18.18%
14.55%9.09%4.55%18.18%4.55%—40.91%
24.55%4.55%—9.09%9.09%—27.27%
34.55%—4.55%——4.55%13.64%
4———————
5+———————
Total18.18%13.64%9.09%31.82%13.64%13.64%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.36 3.41 -2.05
SD 0.95 4.12 4.51
CV 0.70 1.21 —
Max 3 19 +3
Min 0 0 -19

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%4.55%————9.09%
1—9.09%4.55%4.55%——18.18%
218.18%9.09%4.55%———31.82%
39.09%4.55%————13.64%
49.09%—————9.09%
5+18.18%—————18.18%
Total59.09%27.27%9.09%4.55%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.86 0.59 +2.27
SD 2.36 0.85 2.85
CV 0.82 1.45 —
Max 9 3 +9
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%4.55%4.55%4.55%9.09%4.55%36.36%
14.55%9.09%——4.55%9.09%27.27%
24.55%——4.55%——9.09%
34.55%9.09%4.55%—4.55%—22.73%
4———————
5+—4.55%————4.55%
Total22.73%27.27%9.09%9.09%18.18%13.64%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.36 2.55 -1.18
SD 1.43 2.70 3.32
CV 1.05 1.06 —
Max 5 10 +4
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%9.09%4.55%4.55%13.64%13.64%50.00%
14.55%9.09%4.55%—4.55%9.09%31.82%
24.55%4.55%4.55%———13.64%
3———————
4——4.55%———4.55%
5+———————
Total13.64%22.73%18.18%4.55%18.18%22.73%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.77 2.86 -2.09
SD 1.02 2.36 2.86
CV 1.32 0.82 —
Max 4 8 +2
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—13.64%4.55%———18.18%
1—4.55%4.55%———9.09%
24.55%9.09%4.55%9.09%—4.55%31.82%
3—4.55%4.55%—4.55%—13.64%
413.64%—4.55%———18.18%
5+4.55%—4.55%———9.09%
Total22.73%31.82%27.27%9.09%4.55%4.55%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.32 1.55 +0.77
SD 1.59 1.34 2.22
CV 0.68 0.86 —
Max 5 5 +5
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—4.55%4.55%———9.09%
122.73%13.64%4.55%4.55%——45.45%
29.09%—————9.09%
3——4.55%———4.55%
44.55%4.55%————9.09%
5+9.09%13.64%————22.73%
Total45.45%36.36%13.64%4.55%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.64 0.77 +1.86
SD 2.52 0.87 2.73
CV 0.95 1.12 —
Max 8 3 +7
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%—————4.55%
19.09%4.55%————13.64%
2—4.55%————4.55%
313.64%9.09%————22.73%
49.09%4.55%—4.55%——18.18%
5+18.18%9.09%4.55%—4.55%—36.36%
Total54.55%31.82%4.55%4.55%4.55%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 4.64 0.73 +3.91
SD 4.15 1.08 4.29
CV 0.89 1.48 —
Max 19 4 +19
Min 0 0 +0

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%4.55%4.55%———18.18%
118.18%18.18%—4.55%——40.91%
24.55%—————4.55%
3—9.09%9.09%———18.18%
4———4.55%——4.55%
5+9.09%4.55%————13.64%
Total40.91%36.36%13.64%9.09%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.32 0.91 +1.41
SD 2.73 0.97 2.87
CV 1.18 1.07 —
Max 11 3 +10
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%4.55%9.09%4.55%13.64%18.18%54.55%
1——9.09%9.09%4.55%4.55%27.27%
24.55%—————4.55%
3—9.09%4.55%———13.64%
4———————
5+———————
Total9.09%13.64%22.73%13.64%18.18%22.73%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.77 2.95 -2.18
SD 1.07 1.84 2.52
CV 1.38 0.62 —
Max 3 7 +2
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
013.64%4.55%9.09%4.55%4.55%9.09%45.45%
1—4.55%9.09%4.55%—4.55%22.73%
2——4.55%4.55%—4.55%13.64%
3—13.64%————13.64%
44.55%—————4.55%
5+———————
Total18.18%22.73%22.73%13.64%4.55%18.18%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.09 2.27 -1.18
SD 1.27 1.93 2.52
CV 1.16 0.85 —
Max 4 7 +4
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—9.09%9.09%4.55%9.09%18.18%50.00%
1—4.55%—13.64%—9.09%27.27%
2———4.55%—4.55%9.09%
3——4.55%———4.55%
4—4.55%————4.55%
5+4.55%—————4.55%
Total4.55%18.18%13.64%22.73%9.09%31.82%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.09 4.00 -2.91
SD 1.72 3.13 4.03
CV 1.57 0.78 —
Max 7 11 +7
Min 0 0 -11

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%4.55%4.55%4.55%——22.73%
1—13.64%————13.64%
2—9.09%9.09%4.55%——22.73%
3———————
49.09%4.55%———4.55%18.18%
5+9.09%4.55%4.55%4.55%——22.73%
Total27.27%36.36%18.18%13.64%—4.55%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.77 1.41 +1.36
SD 2.45 1.44 2.79
CV 0.88 1.02 —
Max 7 6 +7
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Norma Tallinn 1450 42 35.24 +6.76 100.0% 26 31 33 35 37 40 42
Flora 1303 34 30.28 +3.72 88.0% 20 26 28 30 33 35 38
Nikol Tallinn 1253 33 31.11 +1.89 80.0% 25 27 29 31 33 36 38
Polevkivi Johvi 1171 32 30.54 +1.46 74.0% 24 25 29 30 33 36 41
Vigri Tallinn 1111 27 26.77 +0.23 62.0% 20 21 24 26 29 33 35
Narva Trans 1064 24 21.10 +2.90 82.0% 11 15 19 21 23 27 34
Tallinna Dnamo 889 13 16.77 -3.77 19.0% 9 10 15 17 19 21 25
Keemik 883 18 19.27 -1.27 39.0% 9 13 16 19 22 26 28
DAG Tartu 792 13 18.37 -5.37 9.0% 11 13 16 18 20 24 29
Tulevik Viljandi 697 7 9.72 -2.72 28.0% 3 4 7 9 12 16 18
Merkuur 671 12 12.37 -0.37 50.0% 6 7 10 12 15 17 21
Sillame Kalev 610 9 12.46 -3.46 21.0% 4 7 10 13 14 19 21

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 1% * Slight Edge: 1% to 4.5% * Clear Edge: 4.5% to 7.5% * Strong Edge: 7.5% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+17.42%
Strong Edge
50.76%15.91%33.33%
Elo Value
Home Edge
118 Elo
0.008 goals per Elo point
061.16300
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.71 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.52+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 6th * Longshot: 7th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.1 * Tight Race: 0.1 to 0.19 * Comfortable: 0.19 to 0.38 * Runaway: 0.38 and up.
Title-Race Openness
1.8
One-Team Race
123410
Champion Preseason Odds
74%
Norma Tallinn, 1st of 12
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.36/gm
Comfortable
00.140.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.71 * Some Luck: 2.71 to 4.07 * Lucky: 4.07 to 5.42 * Wild Swing: 5.42 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 0.81 * Close: 0.81 to 1.22 * Off: 1.22 to 1.62 * Way Off: 1.62 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 12 * As Expected: 12 to 19.2 * Several Outliers: 19.2 to 26.4 * Many Outliers: 26.4 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
3.39 points
Some Luck
03.398
Average Finish Error
Expected
0.67
Pinpoint
01.022.5
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.83%
100.00%
Norma Tallinn
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 4.17%
9.00%
DAG Tartu
050
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 12
Minimal Outliers
01.26

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.27 * Even: 0.27 to 0.29 * Top-Heavy: 0.29 to 0.31 * Lopsided: 0.31 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 2.7 * Moderate Separation: 2.7 to 3 * Strong Separation: 3 to 3.3 * Wide Separation: 3.3 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 87.5% * Slight Edge: 87.5% to 91% * Clear Edge: 91% to 93.5% * Wide Edge: 93.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 98% * Clear Edge: 98% to 99% * Strong Edge: 99% to 99.5% * Dominant: 99.5% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 43% * Some Drama: 43% to 46% * Frequent: 46% to 50.5% * Very Frequent: 50.5% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 28.5% * Occasional: 28.5% to 34% * Frequent: 34% to 39.5% * Very Frequent: 39.5% and up.
Gini Index
0.28
Even
00.270.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 273.65
2.68
Coin-Flip Parity
12.733.33.75
Interquartile Edge
92%
Clear Edge
50%87.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 100%
99%
Strong Edge
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
41%
Few
0%31%100%
Blowouts
Expected
38%
Frequent
0%51%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.54 * Slight Separation: 0.54 to 0.58 * Notable Separation: 0.58 to 0.63 * Lopsided: 0.63 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.7 * Some Carryover: 0.7 to 0.84 * Strong Carryover: 0.84 to 0.9 * Near-Lock: 0.9 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 12% * As Expected: 12% to 15% * Upset-Prone: 15% to 19% * Very Upset-Prone: 19% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 9% * As Expected: 9% to 11% * Shaky Favorites: 11% to 16% * Very Shaky: 16% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.40
Highly Predictable
00.482
Matchup Imbalance
0.58
Slight Separation
00.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.07
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.90
Near-Lock
00.70.841
Upset Rate
Expected
11%
Chalky
0%18%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
6%
Solid Favorites
0%14%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.12 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.12 to 0.18 * Above Noise: 0.18 to 0.24 * Well Above Noise: 0.24 and up.
Probability calibration
0.10
Borderline
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.43
Very Underconfident
0.4457231.001.55428
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.106
Well Within Noise
00.1220.3

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456789101112
Norma Tallinn74.00%18.00%7.00%1.00%————————
Flora8.00%26.00%23.00%22.00%19.00%1.00%1.00%—————
Nikol Tallinn9.00%27.00%30.00%29.00%5.00%———————
Polevkivi Johvi7.00%23.00%26.00%29.00%14.00%1.00%——————
Vigri Tallinn2.00%5.00%13.00%15.00%44.00%19.00%1.00%1.00%————
Narva Trans—1.00%—3.00%12.00%33.00%29.00%13.00%6.00%3.00%——
Keemik——1.00%—4.00%22.00%31.00%17.00%15.00%7.00%2.00%1.00%
Tallinna Dnamo—————10.00%14.00%30.00%25.00%9.00%10.00%2.00%
DAG Tartu———1.00%2.00%13.00%21.00%29.00%15.00%15.00%3.00%1.00%
Merkuur—————1.00%1.00%4.00%18.00%28.00%29.00%19.00%
Sillame Kalev——————1.00%5.00%16.00%23.00%37.00%18.00%
Tulevik Viljandi——————1.00%1.00%5.00%15.00%19.00%59.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
Flora 100% —
Narva Trans 100% —
Nikol Tallinn 100% —
Norma Tallinn 100% —
Polevkivi Johvi 100% —
Vigri Tallinn 100% —
Keemik 97.00% 3.00%
DAG Tartu 96.00% 4.00%
Tallinna Dnamo 88.00% 12.00%
Merkuur 52.00% 48.00%
Sillame Kalev 45.00% 55.00%
Tulevik Viljandi 22.00% 78.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1992-08-01 Keemik L 2-355.1 1008 924 63.13% 16.76% 20.11%+1.23 -24.9 0
1992-08-01 @ DAG Tartu W 3-255.1 924 1008 20.11% 16.76% 63.13%-1.23 +24.9 2
1992-08-01 Nikol Tallinn L 0-136.3 909 1154 22.30% 16.70% 61.00%-1.57 -11.1 0
1992-08-01 @ Narva Trans W 1-036.3 1154 909 61.00% 16.70% 22.30%+1.57 +11.1 2
1992-08-01 Merkuur W 5-026.8 1212 853 79.16% 15.97% 4.87%+3.57 +11.6 2
1992-08-01 @ Norma Tallinn L 0-526.8 853 1212 4.87% 15.97% 79.16%-3.57 -11.6 0
1992-08-01 Sillame Kalev W 1-031.9 1118 853 75.62% 16.32% 8.07%+2.77 +4.3 2
1992-08-01 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 0-131.9 853 1118 8.07% 16.32% 75.62%-2.77 -4.3 0
1992-08-01 Tulevik Viljandi W 3-136.2 955 810 68.38% 16.65% 14.97%+1.75 +12.6 2
1992-08-01 @ Tallinna Dnamo L 1-336.2 810 955 14.97% 16.65% 68.38%-1.75 -12.6 0
1992-08-08 Tallinna Dnamo D 1-153.3 949 968 51.57% 16.87% 31.57%+0.36 -2.0 3
1992-08-08 @ Keemik D 1-153.3 968 949 31.57% 16.87% 51.57%-0.36 +2.0 3
1992-08-08 DAG Tartu W 4-134.5 1165 983 71.02% 16.56% 12.42%+2.07 +15.0 4
1992-08-08 @ Nikol Tallinn L 1-434.5 983 1165 12.42% 16.56% 71.02%-2.07 -15.0 0
1992-08-08 Polevkivi Johvi D 1-153.5 1224 1122 64.78% 16.73% 18.48%+1.38 -5.0 3
1992-08-08 @ Norma Tallinn D 1-153.5 1122 1224 18.48% 16.73% 64.78%-1.38 +5.0 3
1992-08-08 Tulevik Viljandi W 2-035.6 841 797 59.06% 16.82% 24.12%+0.90 +22.5 2
1992-08-08 @ Merkuur L 0-235.6 797 841 24.12% 16.82% 59.06%-0.90 -22.5 0
1992-08-08 Narva Trans D 1-153.4 981 898 63.09% 16.76% 20.15%+1.23 -4.6 1
1992-08-08 @ Vigri Tallinn D 1-153.4 898 981 20.15% 16.76% 63.09%-1.23 +4.6 1
1992-08-12 Nikol Tallinn L 0-137.4 970 1180 26.05% 16.76% 57.20%-1.27 -12.7 3
1992-08-12 @ Tallinna Dnamo W 1-037.4 1180 970 57.20% 16.76% 26.05%+1.27 +12.7 6
1992-08-15 Vigri Tallinn L 1-248.6 968 977 52.85% 16.86% 30.29%+0.45 -22.1 0
1992-08-15 @ DAG Tartu W 2-148.6 977 968 30.29% 16.86% 52.85%-0.45 +22.1 3
1992-08-15 Sillame Kalev W 2-035.3 902 848 60.09% 16.81% 23.10%+0.98 +21.6 3
1992-08-15 @ Narva Trans L 0-235.3 848 902 23.10% 16.81% 60.09%-0.98 -21.6 0
1992-08-15 Merkuur W 8-027.1 1127 864 75.52% 16.33% 8.16%+2.75 +30.0 5
1992-08-15 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 0-827.1 864 1127 8.16% 16.33% 75.52%-2.75 -30.0 2
1992-08-15 Keemik L 0-336.5 775 947 30.66% 16.81% 52.53%-0.94 -40.2 0
1992-08-15 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 3-036.5 947 775 52.53% 16.81% 30.66%+0.94 +40.2 5
1992-08-21 Tallinna Dnamo W 4-033.7 999 957 58.79% 16.82% 24.39%+0.87 +43.1 5
1992-08-21 @ Vigri Tallinn L 0-433.7 957 999 24.39% 16.82% 58.79%-0.87 -43.0 3
1992-08-22 Tulevik Viljandi W 8-127.6 1193 734 81.65% 15.51% 2.84%+4.41 +7.7 8
1992-08-22 @ Nikol Tallinn L 1-827.6 734 1193 2.84% 15.51% 81.65%-4.41 -7.7 0
1992-08-22 Narva Trans W 5-235.8 1219 924 76.91% 16.21% 6.88%+3.03 +7.4 5
1992-08-22 @ Norma Tallinn L 2-535.8 924 1219 6.88% 16.21% 76.91%-3.03 -7.4 3
1992-08-22 Flora D 1-153.4 1157 1120 58.27% 16.82% 24.91%+0.83 -3.5 6
1992-08-22 @ Polevkivi Johvi D 1-153.4 1120 1157 24.91% 16.82% 58.27%-0.83 +3.5 1
1992-08-22 DAG Tartu W 3-145.5 827 946 37.67% 16.86% 45.47%-0.49 +33.5 2
1992-08-22 @ Sillame Kalev L 1-345.5 946 827 45.47% 16.86% 37.67%+0.49 -33.5 0
1992-08-22 Keemik D 0-050.7 834 987 33.10% 16.83% 50.07%-0.78 +1.9 3
1992-08-22 @ Merkuur D 0-050.7 987 834 50.07% 16.83% 33.10%+0.78 -1.9 6
1992-08-25 Vigri Tallinn D 2-256.8 1123 1042 62.91% 16.77% 20.32%+1.21 -3.4 2
1992-08-25 @ Flora D 2-256.8 1042 1123 20.32% 16.77% 62.91%-1.21 +3.4 6
1992-08-29 Nikol Tallinn L 0-137.3 985 1201 25.50% 16.75% 57.75%-1.31 -12.5 6
1992-08-29 @ Keemik W 1-037.3 1201 985 57.75% 16.75% 25.50%+1.31 +12.5 10
1992-08-29 Polevkivi Johvi L 2-343.1 916 1154 23.15% 16.71% 60.14%-1.50 -10.3 3
1992-08-29 @ Narva Trans W 3-243.1 1154 916 60.14% 16.71% 23.15%+1.50 +10.3 8
1992-08-29 Sillame Kalev D 0-050.7 914 860 60.07% 16.81% 23.12%+0.98 -4.3 4
1992-08-29 @ Tallinna Dnamo D 0-050.7 860 914 23.12% 16.81% 60.07%-0.98 +4.3 3
1992-08-29 Vigri Tallinn L 0-729.5 727 1045 15.80% 16.53% 67.68%-2.18 -49.2 0
1992-08-29 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 7-029.5 1045 727 67.68% 16.53% 15.80%+2.18 +49.2 8
1992-09-05 Narva Trans W 2-135.8 1120 906 72.97% 16.48% 10.55%+2.34 +5.3 4
1992-09-05 @ Flora L 1-235.8 906 1120 10.55% 16.48% 72.97%-2.34 -5.3 3
1992-09-05 Tallinna Dnamo W 3-028.9 1226 909 77.74% 16.13% 6.13%+3.21 +9.0 7
1992-09-05 @ Norma Tallinn L 0-328.9 909 1226 6.13% 16.13% 77.74%-3.21 -9.0 4
1992-09-05 DAG Tartu W 3-238.7 1164 912 74.96% 16.36% 8.67%+2.65 +4.1 10
1992-09-05 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 2-338.7 912 1164 8.67% 16.36% 74.96%-2.65 -4.1 0
1992-09-05 Tulevik Viljandi W 3-135.4 864 678 71.31% 16.55% 12.14%+2.11 +10.4 5
1992-09-05 @ Sillame Kalev L 1-335.4 678 864 12.14% 16.55% 71.31%-2.11 -10.4 0
1992-09-05 Nikol Tallinn L 0-429.7 836 1213 11.75% 16.35% 71.90%-2.68 -22.0 3
1992-09-05 @ Merkuur W 4-029.7 1213 836 71.90% 16.35% 11.75%+2.68 +22.0 12
1992-09-05 Keemik W 6-030.2 1094 973 66.51% 16.70% 16.79%+1.55 +45.0 10
1992-09-05 @ Vigri Tallinn L 0-630.2 973 1094 16.79% 16.70% 66.51%-1.55 -45.1 6
1992-09-08 Flora L 0-432.8 875 1125 21.80% 16.69% 61.52%-1.61 -38.9 5
1992-09-08 @ Sillame Kalev W 4-032.8 1125 875 61.52% 16.69% 21.80%+1.61 +38.9 6
1992-09-11 Vigri Tallinn D 1-153.6 1235 1139 64.24% 16.74% 19.01%+1.33 -4.8 13
1992-09-11 @ Nikol Tallinn D 1-153.6 1139 1235 19.01% 16.74% 64.24%-1.33 +4.8 11
1992-09-12 Flora W 2-151.3 908 1164 21.26% 16.67% 62.07%-1.65 +25.8 2
1992-09-12 @ DAG Tartu L 1-251.3 1164 908 62.07% 16.67% 21.26%+1.65 -25.8 6
1992-09-12 Sillame Kalev W 5-135.5 928 836 63.85% 16.75% 19.40%+1.30 +29.2 8
1992-09-12 @ Keemik L 1-535.5 836 928 19.40% 16.75% 63.85%-1.30 -29.2 5
1992-09-12 Merkuur W 4-032.3 901 814 63.42% 16.76% 19.82%+1.26 +35.8 5
1992-09-12 @ Narva Trans L 0-432.3 814 901 19.82% 16.76% 63.42%-1.26 -35.8 3
1992-09-12 Polevkivi Johvi L 0-531.6 900 1168 20.14% 16.65% 63.21%-1.75 -44.6 4
1992-09-12 @ Tallinna Dnamo W 5-031.6 1168 900 63.21% 16.65% 20.14%+1.75 +44.6 12
1992-09-12 Norma Tallinn L 0-1125.7 667 1235 4.28% 15.57% 80.15%-4.31 -21.5 0
1992-09-12 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 11-025.7 1235 667 80.15% 15.57% 4.28%+4.31 +21.5 9
1992-09-15 Norma Tallinn L 0-331.9 934 1257 15.44% 16.52% 68.04%-2.22 -21.8 2
1992-09-15 @ DAG Tartu W 3-031.9 1257 934 68.04% 16.52% 15.44%+2.22 +21.8 11
1992-09-15 Merkuur W 8-026.0 1138 778 79.19% 15.96% 4.85%+3.58 +18.0 8
1992-09-15 @ Flora L 0-826.0 778 1138 4.85% 15.96% 79.19%-3.58 -18.0 3
1992-09-18 Tallinna Dnamo W 2-134.5 1156 856 77.12% 16.20% 6.68%+3.07 +3.4 10
1992-09-18 @ Flora L 1-234.5 856 1156 6.68% 16.20% 77.12%-3.07 -3.4 4
1992-09-19 DAG Tartu W 3-139.7 937 912 56.81% 16.84% 26.35%+0.73 +21.0 7
1992-09-19 @ Narva Trans L 1-339.7 912 937 26.35% 16.84% 56.81%-0.73 -21.0 2
1992-09-19 Keemik W 4-132.4 1279 957 77.92% 16.12% 5.96%+3.25 +7.4 13
1992-09-19 @ Norma Tallinn L 1-432.4 957 1279 5.96% 16.12% 77.92%-3.25 -7.4 8
1992-09-19 Tulevik Viljandi W 11-125.7 1213 646 83.51% 14.93% 1.56%+5.33 +5.9 14
1992-09-19 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 1-1125.7 646 1213 1.56% 14.93% 83.51%-5.33 -5.9 0
1992-09-19 Nikol Tallinn L 0-528.2 807 1230 9.25% 16.19% 74.55%-3.08 -21.6 5
1992-09-19 @ Sillame Kalev W 5-028.2 1230 807 74.55% 16.19% 9.25%+3.08 +21.6 15
1992-09-20 Vigri Tallinn L 1-533.0 760 1144 11.35% 16.33% 72.32%-2.74 -17.8 3
1992-09-20 @ Merkuur W 5-133.0 1144 760 72.32% 16.33% 11.35%+2.74 +17.7 13
1992-09-22 Norma Tallinn L 1-343.1 1160 1286 36.71% 16.85% 46.44%-0.55 -27.9 10
1992-09-22 @ Flora W 3-143.1 1286 1160 46.44% 16.85% 36.71%+0.55 +28.0 15
1992-09-25 Polevkivi Johvi L 3-445.3 949 1219 19.99% 16.65% 63.36%-1.77 -8.8 8
1992-09-25 @ Keemik W 4-345.3 1219 949 63.36% 16.65% 19.99%+1.77 +8.8 16
1992-09-26 Merkuur W 1-034.0 891 742 68.68% 16.64% 14.68%+1.78 +7.6 4
1992-09-26 @ DAG Tartu L 0-134.0 742 891 14.68% 16.64% 68.68%-1.78 -7.6 3
1992-09-26 Narva Trans L 1-244.6 852 958 39.63% 16.87% 43.50%-0.37 -17.2 4
1992-09-26 @ Tallinna Dnamo W 2-144.6 958 852 43.50% 16.87% 39.63%+0.37 +17.2 9
1992-09-26 Flora L 0-626.8 640 1132 6.45% 15.92% 77.63%-3.66 -18.1 0
1992-09-26 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 6-026.8 1132 640 77.63% 15.92% 6.45%+3.66 +18.1 12
1992-09-26 Sillame Kalev W 4-131.8 1162 785 79.68% 15.89% 4.43%+3.72 +5.5 15
1992-09-26 @ Vigri Tallinn L 1-431.8 785 1162 4.43% 15.89% 79.68%-3.72 -5.5 5
1992-10-02 Tulevik Viljandi W 5-026.9 975 622 78.96% 15.99% 5.04%+3.52 +12.0 11
1992-10-02 @ Narva Trans L 0-526.9 622 975 5.04% 15.99% 78.96%-3.52 -12.0 0
1992-10-03 Tallinna Dnamo W 2-035.0 899 835 61.11% 16.79% 22.09%+1.06 +20.8 6
1992-10-03 @ DAG Tartu L 0-235.0 835 899 22.09% 16.79% 61.11%-1.06 -20.8 4
1992-10-03 Keemik W 3-030.4 1150 941 72.71% 16.49% 10.80%+2.30 +15.6 14
1992-10-03 @ Flora L 0-330.4 941 1150 10.80% 16.49% 72.71%-2.30 -15.6 8
1992-10-03 Vigri Tallinn W 3-032.1 1314 1167 68.50% 16.65% 14.85%+1.76 +21.0 17
1992-10-03 @ Norma Tallinn L 0-332.1 1167 1314 14.85% 16.65% 68.50%-1.76 -21.0 15
1992-10-03 Nikol Tallinn W 2-038.5 1227 1252 50.80% 16.87% 32.33%+0.31 +29.0 18
1992-10-03 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 0-238.5 1252 1227 32.33% 16.87% 50.80%-0.31 -29.0 15
1992-10-04 Sillame Kalev L 0-242.9 735 780 48.11% 16.87% 35.01%+0.14 -40.6 3
1992-10-04 @ Merkuur W 2-042.9 780 735 35.01% 16.87% 48.11%-0.14 +40.6 7
1992-10-05 Norma Tallinn L 0-141.9 1223 1335 38.66% 16.86% 44.47%-0.43 -17.9 15
1992-10-05 @ Nikol Tallinn W 1-041.9 1335 1223 44.47% 16.86% 38.66%+0.43 +17.9 19
1992-10-10 Narva Trans L 2-350.0 925 987 45.78% 16.88% 37.34%-0.01 -18.4 8
1992-10-10 @ Keemik W 3-250.0 987 925 37.34% 16.88% 45.78%+0.01 +18.4 13
1992-10-10 Flora D 1-153.5 1205 1166 58.53% 16.82% 24.65%+0.85 -3.5 16
1992-10-10 @ Nikol Tallinn D 1-153.5 1166 1205 24.65% 16.82% 58.53%-0.85 +3.5 15
1992-10-10 Norma Tallinn L 0-427.6 820 1353 5.18% 15.74% 79.08%-4.00 -9.9 7
1992-10-10 @ Sillame Kalev W 4-027.6 1353 820 79.08% 15.74% 5.18%+4.00 +10.0 21
1992-10-10 Merkuur D 2-256.8 814 694 66.40% 16.70% 16.90%+1.54 -4.0 5
1992-10-10 @ Tallinna Dnamo D 2-256.8 694 814 16.90% 16.70% 66.40%-1.54 +4.0 4
1992-10-10 DAG Tartu D 1-153.4 610 920 16.46% 16.55% 66.99%-2.11 +5.5 1
1992-10-10 @ Tulevik Viljandi D 1-153.4 920 610 66.99% 16.55% 16.46%+2.11 -5.5 7
1992-10-10 Polevkivi Johvi D 1-153.6 1146 1256 38.98% 16.86% 44.16%-0.41 +0.5 16
1992-10-10 @ Vigri Tallinn D 1-153.6 1256 1146 44.16% 16.86% 38.98%+0.41 -0.5 19
1993-04-30 Norma Tallinn L 1-530.0 698 1363 2.52% 15.07% 82.41%-5.13 -4.0 4
1993-04-30 @ Merkuur W 5-130.0 1363 698 82.41% 15.07% 2.52%+5.13 +4.0 23
1993-04-30 Flora D 0-050.8 1147 1169 51.11% 16.87% 32.03%+0.33 -2.2 17
1993-04-30 @ Vigri Tallinn D 0-050.8 1169 1147 32.03% 16.87% 51.11%-0.33 +2.2 16
1993-05-01 DAG Tartu W 3-140.9 906 914 52.96% 16.86% 30.18%+0.45 +23.7 10
1993-05-01 @ Keemik L 1-340.9 914 906 30.18% 16.86% 52.96%-0.45 -23.7 7
1993-05-01 Narva Trans W 3-239.6 1202 1005 71.91% 16.53% 11.56%+2.19 +5.4 18
1993-05-01 @ Nikol Tallinn L 2-339.6 1005 1202 11.56% 16.53% 71.91%-2.19 -5.4 13
1993-05-01 Polevkivi Johvi L 1-334.1 810 1256 8.25% 16.11% 75.64%-3.26 -7.2 7
1993-05-01 @ Sillame Kalev W 3-134.1 1256 810 75.64% 16.11% 8.25%+3.26 +7.2 21
1993-05-01 Tallinna Dnamo W 3-252.8 615 810 27.86% 16.78% 55.36%-1.14 +21.9 3
1993-05-01 @ Tulevik Viljandi L 2-352.8 810 615 55.36% 16.78% 27.86%+1.14 -21.9 5
1993-05-04 DAG Tartu W 9-026.8 1171 891 76.30% 16.27% 7.43%+2.90 +30.7 18
1993-05-04 @ Flora L 0-926.8 891 1171 7.43% 16.27% 76.30%-2.90 -30.7 7
1993-05-07 Sillame Kalev W 5-026.5 1202 803 80.28% 15.79% 3.93%+3.91 +9.4 20
1993-05-07 @ Flora L 0-526.5 803 1202 3.93% 15.79% 80.28%-3.91 -9.4 7
1993-05-07 Norma Tallinn D 0-051.8 1263 1367 39.81% 16.87% 43.32%-0.36 +0.4 22
1993-05-07 @ Polevkivi Johvi D 0-051.8 1367 1263 43.32% 16.87% 39.81%+0.36 -0.4 24
1993-05-08 Nikol Tallinn D 1-153.5 860 1207 13.69% 16.45% 69.86%-2.43 +6.1 8
1993-05-08 @ DAG Tartu D 1-153.5 1207 860 69.86% 16.45% 13.69%+2.43 -6.1 19
1993-05-08 Vigri Tallinn D 2-256.8 1000 1145 34.19% 16.84% 48.97%-0.71 +1.1 14
1993-05-08 @ Narva Trans D 2-256.8 1145 1000 48.97% 16.84% 34.19%+0.71 -1.1 18
1993-05-08 Keemik D 0-050.7 788 930 34.62% 16.84% 48.54%-0.68 +1.6 6
1993-05-08 @ Tallinna Dnamo D 0-050.7 930 788 48.54% 16.84% 34.62%+0.68 -1.6 11
1993-05-08 Merkuur W 4-141.8 637 694 46.49% 16.88% 36.63%+0.04 +39.5 5
1993-05-08 @ Tulevik Viljandi L 1-441.8 694 637 36.63% 16.88% 46.49%-0.04 -39.5 4
1993-05-15 Tulevik Viljandi W 3-131.3 1367 677 85.02% 14.19% 0.79%+6.38 +0.7 26
1993-05-15 @ Norma Tallinn L 1-331.3 677 1367 0.79% 14.19% 85.02%-6.38 -0.7 5
1993-05-15 Tallinna Dnamo W 3-132.2 1263 790 81.95% 15.44% 2.62%+4.54 +2.3 24
1993-05-15 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 1-332.2 790 1263 2.62% 15.44% 81.95%-4.54 -2.3 6
1993-05-15 Keemik L 0-239.1 794 929 35.52% 16.85% 47.63%-0.63 -31.4 7
1993-05-15 @ Sillame Kalev W 2-039.1 929 794 47.63% 16.85% 35.52%+0.63 +31.4 13
1993-05-15 Narva Trans W 1-050.4 654 1001 13.74% 16.45% 69.81%-2.42 +30.9 6
1993-05-15 @ Merkuur L 0-150.4 1001 654 69.81% 16.45% 13.74%+2.42 -30.9 14
1993-05-15 Nikol Tallinn L 0-242.5 1144 1201 46.43% 16.88% 36.69%+0.03 -39.4 18
1993-05-15 @ Vigri Tallinn W 2-042.5 1201 1144 36.69% 16.88% 46.43%-0.03 +39.4 21
1993-05-18 Tulevik Viljandi W 7-231.6 1104 676 80.99% 15.66% 3.35%+4.16 +5.5 20
1993-05-18 @ Vigri Tallinn L 2-731.6 676 1104 3.35% 15.66% 80.99%-4.16 -5.5 5
1993-05-22 Sillame Kalev W 3-032.8 866 762 64.95% 16.73% 18.32%+1.40 +25.5 10
1993-05-22 @ DAG Tartu L 0-332.8 762 866 18.32% 16.73% 64.95%-1.40 -25.5 7
1993-05-22 Merkuur D 1-153.5 960 685 76.03% 16.29% 7.68%+2.85 -7.7 14
1993-05-22 @ Keemik D 1-153.5 685 960 7.68% 16.29% 76.03%-2.85 +7.7 7
1993-05-22 Vigri Tallinn D 0-050.8 788 1110 15.51% 16.52% 67.97%-2.22 +6.4 7
1993-05-22 @ Tallinna Dnamo D 0-050.8 1110 788 67.97% 16.52% 15.51%+2.22 -6.4 21
1993-05-22 Nikol Tallinn L 0-229.3 670 1240 4.24% 15.57% 80.19%-4.32 -4.3 5
1993-05-22 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 2-029.3 1240 670 80.19% 15.57% 4.24%+4.32 +4.3 23
1993-05-23 Polevkivi Johvi W 2-039.7 1211 1266 46.84% 16.88% 36.29%+0.06 +32.0 22
1993-05-23 @ Flora L 0-239.7 1266 1211 36.29% 16.88% 46.84%-0.06 -32.0 24
1993-05-23 Norma Tallinn L 3-442.5 970 1367 10.62% 16.29% 73.10%-2.85 -4.9 14
1993-05-23 @ Narva Trans W 4-342.5 1367 970 73.10% 16.29% 10.62%+2.85 +4.9 28
1993-05-28 Flora L 0-328.4 693 1243 4.71% 15.66% 79.63%-4.15 -6.9 7
1993-05-28 @ Merkuur W 3-028.4 1243 693 79.63% 15.66% 4.71%+4.15 +6.9 24
1993-05-29 Keemik W 8-129.1 1244 952 76.78% 16.23% 6.99%+3.00 +18.7 25
1993-05-29 @ Nikol Tallinn L 1-829.1 952 1244 6.99% 16.23% 76.78%-3.00 -18.7 14
1993-05-29 DAG Tartu W 19-025.4 1372 891 82.09% 15.40% 2.51%+4.60 +21.6 30
1993-05-29 @ Norma Tallinn L 0-1925.4 891 1372 2.51% 15.40% 82.09%-4.60 -21.6 10
1993-05-29 Narva Trans W 1-031.9 1234 965 75.76% 16.31% 7.93%+2.80 +4.2 26
1993-05-29 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 0-131.9 965 1234 7.93% 16.31% 75.76%-2.80 -4.2 14
1993-05-29 Tallinna Dnamo L 1-345.7 737 794 46.41% 16.88% 36.71%+0.03 -34.1 7
1993-05-29 @ Sillame Kalev W 3-145.7 794 737 36.71% 16.88% 46.41%-0.03 +34.1 9
1993-06-06 Polevkivi Johvi D 0-050.8 870 1238 12.32% 16.38% 71.29%-2.61 +7.2 11
1993-06-06 @ DAG Tartu D 0-050.8 1238 870 71.29% 16.38% 12.32%+2.61 -7.2 27
1993-06-06 Vigri Tallinn L 0-435.6 934 1103 30.95% 16.81% 52.24%-0.92 -52.9 14
1993-06-06 @ Keemik W 4-035.6 1103 934 52.24% 16.81% 30.95%+0.92 +52.9 23
1993-06-06 Merkuur W 1-029.5 1263 686 83.65% 14.87% 1.48%+5.42 +0.8 27
1993-06-06 @ Nikol Tallinn L 0-129.5 686 1263 1.48% 14.87% 83.65%-5.42 -0.8 7
1993-06-06 Norma Tallinn L 0-526.6 828 1394 4.34% 15.59% 80.07%-4.28 -10.3 9
1993-06-06 @ Tallinna Dnamo W 5-026.6 1394 828 80.07% 15.59% 4.34%+4.28 +10.3 32
1993-06-06 Sillame Kalev W 7-035.1 666 703 49.23% 16.87% 33.90%+0.21 +97.0 7
1993-06-06 @ Tulevik Viljandi L 0-735.1 703 666 33.90% 16.87% 49.23%-0.21 -97.0 7
1993-06-07 Flora L 0-233.9 961 1250 18.18% 16.60% 65.22%-1.94 -17.4 14
1993-06-07 @ Narva Trans W 2-033.9 1250 961 65.22% 16.60% 18.18%+1.94 +17.4 26
1993-06-12 Tulevik Viljandi W 1-034.7 881 763 66.15% 16.71% 17.14%+1.52 +8.8 16
1993-06-12 @ Keemik L 0-134.7 763 881 17.14% 16.71% 66.15%-1.52 -8.8 7
1993-06-12 Tallinna Dnamo W 7-128.4 1264 818 81.39% 15.57% 3.04%+4.31 +7.1 29
1993-06-12 @ Nikol Tallinn L 1-728.4 818 1264 3.04% 15.57% 81.39%-4.31 -7.1 9
1993-06-12 Narva Trans L 1-236.9 606 944 14.34% 16.47% 69.19%-2.35 -7.0 7
1993-06-12 @ Sillame Kalev W 2-136.9 944 606 69.19% 16.47% 14.34%+2.35 +7.0 16
1993-06-12 Polevkivi Johvi D 1-153.7 685 1231 4.84% 15.68% 79.47%-4.11 +8.5 8
1993-06-12 @ Merkuur D 1-153.7 1231 685 79.47% 15.68% 4.84%+4.11 -8.5 28
1993-06-12 DAG Tartu W 7-336.3 1156 877 76.23% 16.27% 7.49%+2.89 +9.3 25
1993-06-12 @ Vigri Tallinn L 3-736.3 877 1156 7.49% 16.27% 76.23%-2.89 -9.3 11
1993-06-13 Flora W 1-035.8 1404 1268 67.70% 16.67% 15.63%+1.68 +8.0 34
1993-06-13 @ Norma Tallinn L 0-135.8 1268 1404 15.63% 16.67% 67.70%-1.68 -8.0 26
1993-06-15 Narva Trans L 2-448.1 868 951 42.86% 16.87% 40.27%-0.18 -28.5 11
1993-06-15 @ DAG Tartu W 4-248.1 951 868 40.27% 16.87% 42.86%+0.18 +28.5 18
1993-06-15 Sillame Kalev W 5-025.1 1271 599 84.83% 14.30% 0.87%+6.23 +2.0 31
1993-06-15 @ Nikol Tallinn L 0-525.1 599 1271 0.87% 14.30% 84.83%-6.23 -2.0 7
1993-06-15 Polevkivi Johvi L 0-131.6 754 1222 7.34% 16.02% 76.64%-3.45 -3.9 7
1993-06-15 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 1-031.6 1222 754 76.64% 16.02% 7.34%+3.45 +3.9 30
1993-06-15 Merkuur W 2-133.1 1166 694 81.92% 15.44% 2.64%+4.53 +1.3 27
1993-06-15 @ Vigri Tallinn L 1-233.1 694 1166 2.64% 15.44% 81.92%-4.53 -1.3 8
1993-06-16 Tallinna Dnamo W 2-028.9 1260 811 81.45% 15.56% 2.99%+4.33 +3.0 28
1993-06-16 @ Flora L 0-228.9 811 1260 2.99% 15.56% 81.45%-4.33 -3.0 9
1993-06-16 Norma Tallinn L 1-1027.5 889 1412 5.47% 15.79% 78.74%-3.92 -18.6 16
1993-06-16 @ Keemik W 10-127.5 1412 889 78.74% 15.79% 5.47%+3.92 +18.6 36
1993-06-19 Tulevik Viljandi W 4-026.5 1263 750 82.65% 15.23% 2.11%+4.87 +4.1 30
1993-06-19 @ Flora L 0-426.5 750 1263 2.11% 15.23% 82.65%-4.87 -4.1 7
1993-06-19 Tallinna Dnamo W 5-237.8 979 808 70.28% 16.59% 13.13%+1.97 +13.7 20
1993-06-19 @ Narva Trans L 2-537.8 808 979 13.13% 16.59% 70.28%-1.97 -13.7 9
1993-06-19 Nikol Tallinn W 2-138.8 1431 1273 69.30% 16.62% 14.07%+1.86 +6.9 38
1993-06-19 @ Norma Tallinn L 1-238.8 1273 1431 14.07% 16.62% 69.30%-1.86 -6.9 31
1993-06-19 Keemik L 1-355.3 1226 871 79.03% 15.98% 4.98%+3.54 -57.6 30
1993-06-19 @ Polevkivi Johvi W 3-155.3 871 1226 4.98% 15.98% 79.03%-3.54 +57.6 18
1993-06-19 Vigri Tallinn W 3-259.9 597 1167 4.23% 15.56% 80.21%-4.32 +32.0 9
1993-06-19 @ Sillame Kalev L 2-359.9 1167 597 80.21% 15.56% 4.23%+4.32 -32.0 27
1993-06-19 DAG Tartu W 4-250.0 692 839 33.91% 16.84% 49.25%-0.73 +32.1 10
1993-06-19 @ Merkuur L 2-450.0 839 692 49.25% 16.84% 33.91%+0.73 -32.1 11
1993-06-22 Flora L 0-232.6 928 1267 14.31% 16.47% 69.22%-2.35 -14.0 18
1993-06-22 @ Keemik W 2-032.6 1267 928 69.22% 16.47% 14.31%+2.35 +14.0 32
1993-06-22 Polevkivi Johvi W 1-035.5 1266 1168 64.42% 16.74% 18.84%+1.35 +9.5 33
1993-06-22 @ Nikol Tallinn L 0-135.5 1168 1266 18.84% 16.74% 64.42%-1.35 -9.5 30
1993-06-22 Merkuur L 1-245.0 629 725 40.96% 16.87% 42.17%-0.30 -17.7 9
1993-06-22 @ Sillame Kalev W 2-145.0 725 629 42.17% 16.87% 40.96%+0.30 +17.7 12
1993-06-22 DAG Tartu W 3-141.1 794 807 52.26% 16.86% 30.87%+0.41 +24.1 11
1993-06-22 @ Tallinna Dnamo L 1-341.1 807 794 30.87% 16.86% 52.26%-0.41 -24.1 11
1993-06-22 Narva Trans L 0-433.0 746 993 22.22% 16.69% 61.09%-1.57 -39.6 7
1993-06-22 @ Tulevik Viljandi W 4-033.0 993 746 61.09% 16.69% 22.22%+1.57 +39.6 22
1993-06-23 Norma Tallinn L 4-645.5 1135 1438 17.06% 16.57% 66.37%-2.05 -11.6 27
1993-06-23 @ Vigri Tallinn W 6-445.5 1438 1135 66.37% 16.57% 17.06%+2.05 +11.6 40
1993-06-26 Tulevik Viljandi W 3-242.5 783 707 62.38% 16.78% 20.84%+1.17 +9.4 13
1993-06-26 @ DAG Tartu L 2-342.5 707 783 20.84% 16.78% 62.38%-1.17 -9.4 7
1993-06-26 Nikol Tallinn W 3-141.1 1281 1276 54.51% 16.85% 28.63%+0.56 +22.6 34
1993-06-26 @ Flora L 1-341.1 1276 1281 28.63% 16.85% 54.51%-0.56 -22.6 33
1993-06-26 Keemik W 4-031.4 1032 915 66.18% 16.71% 17.11%+1.52 +31.3 24
1993-06-26 @ Narva Trans L 0-431.4 915 1032 17.11% 16.71% 66.18%-1.52 -31.3 18
1993-06-26 Sillame Kalev W 4-025.4 1449 611 86.45% 13.20% 0.35%+7.64 +0.6 42
1993-06-26 @ Norma Tallinn L 0-425.4 611 1449 0.35% 13.20% 86.45%-7.64 -0.6 9
1993-06-26 Vigri Tallinn W 1-037.2 1159 1123 58.09% 16.83% 25.09%+0.82 +12.3 32
1993-06-26 @ Polevkivi Johvi L 0-137.2 1123 1159 25.09% 16.83% 58.09%-0.82 -12.3 27
1993-06-26 Tallinna Dnamo L 0-439.5 742 818 43.82% 16.87% 39.31%-0.13 -71.1 12
1993-06-26 @ Merkuur W 4-039.5 818 742 39.31% 16.87% 43.82%+0.13 +71.1 13

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1993-06-19 4.23% @ Sillame Kalev 597 3 Vigri Tallinn 1167 2
2 1993-06-19 4.98% Keemik 871 3 @ Polevkivi Johvi 1226 1
3 1993-05-15 13.74% @ Merkuur 654 1 Narva Trans 1001 0
4 1992-08-01 20.11% Keemik 924 3 @ DAG Tartu 1008 2
5 1992-09-12 21.26% @ DAG Tartu 908 2 Flora 1164 1
6 1993-05-01 27.86% @ Tulevik Viljandi 615 3 Tallinna Dnamo 810 2
7 1992-08-15 30.29% Vigri Tallinn 977 2 @ DAG Tartu 968 1
8 1993-06-19 33.91% @ Merkuur 692 4 DAG Tartu 839 2
9 1992-10-04 35.01% Sillame Kalev 780 2 @ Merkuur 735 0
10 1993-05-15 36.69% Nikol Tallinn 1201 2 @ Vigri Tallinn 1144 0
11 1993-05-29 36.71% Tallinna Dnamo 794 3 @ Sillame Kalev 737 1
12 1992-10-10 37.34% Narva Trans 987 3 @ Keemik 925 2
13 1992-08-22 37.67% @ Sillame Kalev 827 3 DAG Tartu 946 1
14 1993-06-26 39.31% Tallinna Dnamo 818 4 @ Merkuur 742 0
15 1993-06-15 40.27% Narva Trans 951 4 @ DAG Tartu 868 2

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1993-06-06 97.03 @ Tulevik Viljandi 7 666 49.23% Sillame Kalev 0 703 33.90% 16.87%
2 1993-06-26 71.06 Tallinna Dnamo 4 818 39.31% @ Merkuur 0 742 43.82% 16.87%
3 1993-06-19 57.64 Keemik 3 871 4.98% @ Polevkivi Johvi 1 1226 79.03% 15.98%
4 1993-06-06 52.93 Vigri Tallinn 4 1103 52.24% @ Keemik 0 934 30.95% 16.81%
5 1992-08-29 49.17 Vigri Tallinn 7 1045 67.68% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 727 15.80% 16.53%
6 1992-09-05 45.06 @ Vigri Tallinn 6 1094 66.51% Keemik 0 973 16.79% 16.70%
7 1992-09-12 44.64 Polevkivi Johvi 5 1168 63.21% @ Tallinna Dnamo 0 900 20.14% 16.65%
8 1992-08-21 43.05 @ Vigri Tallinn 4 999 58.79% Tallinna Dnamo 0 957 24.39% 16.82%
9 1992-10-04 40.62 Sillame Kalev 2 780 35.01% @ Merkuur 0 735 48.11% 16.87%
10 1992-08-15 40.20 Keemik 3 947 52.53% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 775 30.66% 16.81%
11 1993-06-22 39.57 Narva Trans 4 993 61.09% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 746 22.22% 16.69%
12 1993-05-08 39.47 @ Tulevik Viljandi 4 637 46.49% Merkuur 1 694 36.63% 16.88%
13 1993-05-15 39.36 Nikol Tallinn 2 1201 36.69% @ Vigri Tallinn 0 1144 46.43% 16.88%
14 1992-09-08 38.89 Flora 4 1125 61.52% @ Sillame Kalev 0 875 21.80% 16.69%
15 1992-09-12 35.78 @ Narva Trans 4 901 63.42% Merkuur 0 814 19.82% 16.76%
16 1993-05-29 34.09 Tallinna Dnamo 3 794 36.71% @ Sillame Kalev 1 737 46.41% 16.88%
17 1992-08-22 33.48 @ Sillame Kalev 3 827 37.67% DAG Tartu 1 946 45.47% 16.86%
18 1993-06-19 32.12 @ Merkuur 4 692 33.91% DAG Tartu 2 839 49.25% 16.84%
19 1993-05-23 31.97 @ Flora 2 1211 46.84% Polevkivi Johvi 0 1266 36.29% 16.88%
20 1993-06-19 31.95 @ Sillame Kalev 3 597 4.23% Vigri Tallinn 2 1167 80.21% 15.56%
21 1993-05-15 31.39 Keemik 2 929 47.63% @ Sillame Kalev 0 794 35.52% 16.85%
22 1993-06-26 31.32 @ Narva Trans 4 1032 66.18% Keemik 0 915 17.11% 16.71%
23 1993-05-15 30.87 @ Merkuur 1 654 13.74% Narva Trans 0 1001 69.81% 16.45%
24 1993-05-04 30.70 @ Flora 9 1171 76.30% DAG Tartu 0 891 7.43% 16.27%
25 1992-08-15 30.01 @ Polevkivi Johvi 8 1127 75.52% Merkuur 0 864 8.16% 16.33%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1993-06-19 59.9 @ Sillame Kalev 3 597 4.23% Vigri Tallinn 2 1167 80.21% 15.56%
2 1992-08-25 56.8 @ Flora 2 1123 62.91% Vigri Tallinn 2 1042 20.32% 16.77%
3 1992-10-10 56.8 @ Tallinna Dnamo 2 814 66.40% Merkuur 2 694 16.90% 16.70%
4 1993-05-08 56.8 @ Narva Trans 2 1000 34.19% Vigri Tallinn 2 1145 48.97% 16.84%
5 1993-06-19 55.3 Keemik 3 871 4.98% @ Polevkivi Johvi 1 1226 79.03% 15.98%
6 1992-08-01 55.1 Keemik 3 924 20.11% @ DAG Tartu 2 1008 63.13% 16.76%
7 1993-06-12 53.7 @ Merkuur 1 685 4.84% Polevkivi Johvi 1 1231 79.47% 15.68%
8 1992-09-11 53.6 @ Nikol Tallinn 1 1235 64.24% Vigri Tallinn 1 1139 19.01% 16.74%
9 1992-10-10 53.6 @ Vigri Tallinn 1 1146 38.98% Polevkivi Johvi 1 1256 44.16% 16.86%
10 1992-08-08 53.5 @ Norma Tallinn 1 1224 64.78% Polevkivi Johvi 1 1122 18.48% 16.73%
11 1992-10-10 53.5 @ Nikol Tallinn 1 1205 58.53% Flora 1 1166 24.65% 16.82%
12 1993-05-08 53.5 @ DAG Tartu 1 860 13.69% Nikol Tallinn 1 1207 69.86% 16.45%
13 1993-05-22 53.5 @ Keemik 1 960 76.03% Merkuur 1 685 7.68% 16.29%
14 1992-08-08 53.4 @ Vigri Tallinn 1 981 63.09% Narva Trans 1 898 20.15% 16.76%
15 1992-08-22 53.4 @ Polevkivi Johvi 1 1157 58.27% Flora 1 1120 24.91% 16.82%
16 1992-10-10 53.4 @ Tulevik Viljandi 1 610 16.46% DAG Tartu 1 920 66.99% 16.55%
17 1992-08-08 53.3 @ Keemik 1 949 51.57% Tallinna Dnamo 1 968 31.57% 16.87%
18 1993-05-01 52.8 @ Tulevik Viljandi 3 615 27.86% Tallinna Dnamo 2 810 55.36% 16.78%
19 1993-05-07 51.8 @ Polevkivi Johvi 0 1263 39.81% Norma Tallinn 0 1367 43.32% 16.87%
20 1992-09-12 51.3 @ DAG Tartu 2 908 21.26% Flora 1 1164 62.07% 16.67%
21 1993-04-30 50.8 @ Vigri Tallinn 0 1147 51.11% Flora 0 1169 32.03% 16.87%
22 1993-05-22 50.8 @ Tallinna Dnamo 0 788 15.51% Vigri Tallinn 0 1110 67.97% 16.52%
23 1993-06-06 50.8 @ DAG Tartu 0 870 12.32% Polevkivi Johvi 0 1238 71.29% 16.38%
24 1992-08-22 50.7 @ Merkuur 0 834 33.10% Keemik 0 987 50.07% 16.83%
25 1992-08-29 50.7 @ Tallinna Dnamo 0 914 60.07% Sillame Kalev 0 860 23.12% 16.81%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1993-06-15 25.1 @ Nikol Tallinn 5 1271 84.83% Sillame Kalev 0 599 0.87% 14.30%
2 1993-05-29 25.4 @ Norma Tallinn 19 1372 82.09% DAG Tartu 0 891 2.51% 15.40%
3 1993-06-26 25.4 @ Norma Tallinn 4 1449 86.45% Sillame Kalev 0 611 0.35% 13.20%
4 1992-09-12 25.7 Norma Tallinn 11 1235 80.15% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 667 4.28% 15.57%
5 1992-09-19 25.7 @ Polevkivi Johvi 11 1213 83.51% Tulevik Viljandi 1 646 1.56% 14.93%
6 1992-09-15 26.0 @ Flora 8 1138 79.19% Merkuur 0 778 4.85% 15.96%
7 1993-05-07 26.5 @ Flora 5 1202 80.28% Sillame Kalev 0 803 3.93% 15.79%
8 1993-06-19 26.5 @ Flora 4 1263 82.65% Tulevik Viljandi 0 750 2.11% 15.23%
9 1993-06-06 26.6 Norma Tallinn 5 1394 80.07% @ Tallinna Dnamo 0 828 4.34% 15.59%
10 1992-08-01 26.8 @ Norma Tallinn 5 1212 79.16% Merkuur 0 853 4.87% 15.97%
11 1992-09-26 26.8 Flora 6 1132 77.63% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 640 6.45% 15.92%
12 1993-05-04 26.8 @ Flora 9 1171 76.30% DAG Tartu 0 891 7.43% 16.27%
13 1992-10-02 26.9 @ Narva Trans 5 975 78.96% Tulevik Viljandi 0 622 5.04% 15.99%
14 1992-08-15 27.1 @ Polevkivi Johvi 8 1127 75.52% Merkuur 0 864 8.16% 16.33%
15 1993-06-16 27.5 Norma Tallinn 10 1412 78.74% @ Keemik 1 889 5.47% 15.79%
16 1992-08-22 27.6 @ Nikol Tallinn 8 1193 81.65% Tulevik Viljandi 1 734 2.84% 15.51%
17 1992-10-10 27.6 Norma Tallinn 4 1353 79.08% @ Sillame Kalev 0 820 5.18% 15.74%
18 1992-09-19 28.2 Nikol Tallinn 5 1230 74.55% @ Sillame Kalev 0 807 9.25% 16.19%
19 1993-05-28 28.4 Flora 3 1243 79.63% @ Merkuur 0 693 4.71% 15.66%
20 1993-06-12 28.4 @ Nikol Tallinn 7 1264 81.39% Tallinna Dnamo 1 818 3.04% 15.57%
21 1992-09-05 28.9 @ Norma Tallinn 3 1226 77.74% Tallinna Dnamo 0 909 6.13% 16.13%
22 1993-06-16 28.9 @ Flora 2 1260 81.45% Tallinna Dnamo 0 811 2.99% 15.56%
23 1993-05-29 29.1 @ Nikol Tallinn 8 1244 76.78% Keemik 1 952 6.99% 16.23%
24 1993-05-22 29.3 Nikol Tallinn 2 1240 80.19% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 670 4.24% 15.57%
25 1992-08-29 29.5 Vigri Tallinn 7 1045 67.68% @ Tulevik Viljandi 0 727 15.80% 16.53%