‹ ›

1963 Úrvalsdeild Season

30 games

Final

Champion

KR Reykjavik

15 points · 4th Title

Last Title: 1961.0

Relegated

IBA Akureyri

6 pts

Biggest Overachiever

KR Reykjavik

3.15 points above expected

15 points · 11.85 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

IBA Akureyri

2.62 points below expected

6 points · 8.62 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 KR Reykjavik Champion 10 7 1 2 15 27 16 +11 11.85 +3.15
2 IA Akranes 10 6 1 3 13 25 17 +8 11.15 +1.85
3 Valur Reykjavik 10 4 2 4 10 20 20 0 10.92 -0.92
4 Fram Reykjavik 10 4 1 5 9 11 20 -9 9.90 -0.90
5 Keflavik IF 10 3 1 6 7 15 19 -4 7.56 -0.56
6 IBA Akureyri Relegated 10 2 2 6 6 16 22 -6 8.62 -2.62

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 KR Reykjavik 15 11.85 +3.15
2 IA Akranes 13 11.15 +1.85
3 Keflavik IF 7 7.56 -0.56
4 Fram Reykjavik 9 9.90 -0.90
5 Valur Reykjavik 10 10.92 -0.92

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 IBA Akureyri 6 8.62 -2.62
2 Valur Reykjavik 10 10.92 -0.92
3 Fram Reykjavik 9 9.90 -0.90
4 Keflavik IF 7 7.56 -0.56
5 IA Akranes 13 11.15 +1.85

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 KR Reykjavik 5 Jun 30 – Aug 25 1 in 13
2 Valur Reykjavik 2 May 27 – Jun 1 1 in 6
3 Fram Reykjavik 3 May 23 – Jun 14 1 in 4
4 IBA Akureyri 1 Jun 3 – Jun 3 1 in 4
5 Keflavik IF 1 Jun 16 – Jun 16 1 in 2

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IBA Akureyri 4 Jul 14 – Aug 25 1 in 161
2 IA Akranes 2 Jun 1 – Jun 16 1 in 9
3 Fram Reykjavik 3 Jul 21 – Aug 25 1 in 7
4 Valur Reykjavik 2 Aug 11 – Aug 18 1 in 4
5 Keflavik IF 3 Jun 24 – Jul 6 1 in 4

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IBA Akureyri 4 Jun 3 – Jun 30 1 in 33
2 KR Reykjavik 8 Jun 20 – Aug 25 1 in 13
3 Keflavik IF 2 Aug 1 – Aug 11 1 in 5
4 IA Akranes 3 Jun 23 – Jul 6 1 in 3
5 Valur Reykjavik 2 May 27 – Jun 1 1 in 3

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IBA Akureyri 4 Jul 14 – Aug 25 1 in 27
2 Valur Reykjavik 3 Jun 14 – Jun 30 1 in 7
3 Fram Reykjavik 3 Jun 20 – Jun 29 1 in 5
4 IA Akranes 2 Jun 1 – Jun 16 1 in 4
5 Keflavik IF 3 Jun 24 – Jul 6 1 in 2

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
KR Reykjavik 1202 15 +228 10 6.8 +3.2
IA Akranes 1138 13 +157 7 4.6 +2.4
Valur Reykjavik 935 10 -82 5 6.0 -1.0
Fram Reykjavik 756 9 -140 3 3.9 -0.9
Keflavik IF 965 7 +172 5 3.1 +1.9
IBA Akureyri 726 6 -262 2 5.9 -3.9

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team FR IA IA KR KI VR
Fram Reykjavik —
0-1-1
2.67
2-0-0
2.60
0-0-2
2.49
1-0-1
3.80
1-0-1
2.35
IA Akranes
1-1-0
3.05
—
2-0-0
3.09
1-0-1
2.78
1-0-1
3.92
1-0-1
3.15
IBA Akureyri
0-0-2
3.11
0-0-2
2.63
—
0-1-1
1.35
1-0-1
2.83
1-1-0
2.41
KR Reykjavik
2-0-0
3.23
1-0-1
2.93
1-1-0
4.37
—
2-0-0
3.71
1-0-1
2.83
Keflavik IF
1-0-1
1.92
1-0-1
1.80
1-0-1
2.89
0-0-2
2.01
—
0-1-1
1.72
Valur Reykjavik
1-0-1
3.36
1-0-1
2.56
0-1-1
3.31
1-0-1
2.89
1-1-0
4.00
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.71 +4.7
Allowed 0.80 -14.2
Differential 0.81 +3.9

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—5.00%5.00%3.33%——13.33%
15.00%3.33%11.67%8.33%——28.33%
25.00%11.67%6.67%1.67%3.33%5.00%33.33%
33.33%8.33%1.67%———13.33%
4——3.33%—3.33%—6.67%
5+——5.00%———5.00%
Total13.33%28.33%33.33%13.33%6.67%5.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.90 1.90 +0.00
SD 1.40 1.40 1.95
CV 0.74 0.74 —
Max 7 7 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——20.00%10.00%——30.00%
130.00%—————30.00%
2—10.00%10.00%——20.00%40.00%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total30.00%10.00%30.00%10.00%—20.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.10 2.00 -0.90
SD 0.88 1.89 1.85
CV 0.80 0.94 —
Max 2 5 +1
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
1——20.00%10.00%——30.00%
2—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
3—30.00%————30.00%
4——10.00%———10.00%
5+——10.00%———10.00%
Total—40.00%50.00%10.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.50 1.70 +0.80
SD 1.35 0.67 1.69
CV 0.54 0.40 —
Max 5 3 +3
Min 1 1 -2

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
1——20.00%20.00%——40.00%
2—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
3———————
4——10.00%—10.00%—20.00%
5+———————
Total—20.00%50.00%20.00%10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.60 2.20 -0.60
SD 1.43 0.92 1.35
CV 0.89 0.42 —
Max 4 4 +2
Min 0 1 -2

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———10.00%——10.00%
1——10.00%———10.00%
210.00%20.00%10.00%———40.00%
3—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
4———————
5+——20.00%———20.00%
Total10.00%30.00%50.00%10.00%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.70 1.60 +1.10
SD 2.00 0.84 2.18
CV 0.74 0.53 —
Max 7 3 +5
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—10.00%————10.00%
1—10.00%10.00%10.00%——30.00%
220.00%10.00%—10.00%20.00%—60.00%
3———————
4———————
5+———————
Total20.00%30.00%10.00%20.00%20.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 1.90 -0.40
SD 0.71 1.52 1.58
CV 0.47 0.80 —
Max 2 4 +2
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—10.00%————10.00%
1—10.00%10.00%10.00%——30.00%
2—10.00%———10.00%20.00%
320.00%10.00%————30.00%
4————10.00%—10.00%
5+———————
Total20.00%40.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.00 2.00 +0.00
SD 1.25 2.16 2.45
CV 0.62 1.08 —
Max 4 7 +3
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 10

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
KR Reykjavik 1202 15 11.85 +3.15 96.0% 5 8 10 12 13 15 18
IA Akranes 1138 13 11.15 +1.85 86.0% 5 7 9 11 13 16 18
Keflavik IF 965 7 7.56 -0.56 44.0% 3 3 5 8 9 12 14
Valur Reykjavik 935 10 10.92 -0.92 42.0% 4 6 9 11 13 15 16
Fram Reykjavik 756 9 9.90 -0.90 42.0% 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
IBA Akureyri 726 6 8.62 -2.62 16.0% 4 5 7 9 10 12 14

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 4.5% * Slight Edge: 4.5% to 11% * Clear Edge: 11% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+26.67%
Strong Edge
56.67%13.33%30.00%
Elo Value
Home Edge
184 Elo
0.005 goals per Elo point
094.94500
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.60 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.51+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd * Longshot: 4th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.07 * Tight Race: 0.07 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.33 * Runaway: 0.33 and up.
Title-Race Openness
3.8
Open
12346
Champion Preseason Odds
36%
KR Reykjavik, 1st of 6
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.20/gm
Comfortable
00.170.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 1.93 * Some Luck: 1.93 to 2.89 * Lucky: 2.89 to 3.86 * Wild Swing: 3.86 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 0.99 * Close: 0.99 to 1.48 * Off: 1.48 to 1.97 * Way Off: 1.97 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 6 * As Expected: 6 to 9.6 * Several Outliers: 9.6 to 13.2 * Many Outliers: 13.2 and up.
Unexpected Relegations
Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 0.56 * A Surprise: 0.56 to 0.9 * Several Surprises: 0.9 to 1.23 * Many Surprises: 1.23 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
1.92 points
As Expected
02.416
Average Finish Error
Expected
0.33
Pinpoint
01.232.5
Biggest Overachiever
Expected
96.00%
KR Reykjavik
5091.67%100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
16.00%
IBA Akureyri
08.33%50
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 6
Minimal Outliers
00.66
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
1 of 1
Several Surprises
00.61

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.16 * Even: 0.16 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.65 * Strong Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Wide Separation: 1.85 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 63% * Slight Edge: 63% to 69% * Clear Edge: 69% to 75.5% * Wide Edge: 75.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 80.5% * Clear Edge: 80.5% to 88.5% * Strong Edge: 88.5% to 94% * Dominant: 94% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 55% * Some Drama: 55% to 61% * Frequent: 61% to 65% * Very Frequent: 65% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 14.5% * Occasional: 14.5% to 18% * Frequent: 18% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.18
Even
00.160.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 193.59
1.18
Coin-Flip Parity
0.71.351.652.5
Interquartile Edge
85%
Wide Edge
50%63%69%75.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 96%
94%
Strong Edge
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
50%
Few
0%56%100%
Blowouts
Expected
17%
Occasional
0%20%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.28 * Slight Separation: 0.28 to 0.36 * Notable Separation: 0.36 to 0.41 * Lopsided: 0.41 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.33 * Some Carryover: 0.33 to 0.59 * Strong Carryover: 0.59 to 0.75 * Near-Lock: 0.75 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24.5% * Upset-Prone: 24.5% to 29% * Very Upset-Prone: 29% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 16% * As Expected: 16% to 21.5% * Shaky Favorites: 21.5% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.53
Highly Predictable
00.532
Matchup Imbalance
0.41
Lopsided
00.280.360.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.72
Very Predictable
01.002
Repeatability
0.66
Strong Carryover
00.330.590.751
Upset Rate
Expected
33%
Very Upset-Prone
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
23%
Shaky Favorites
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.26 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.26 to 0.39 * Above Noise: 0.39 to 0.52 * Well Above Noise: 0.52 and up.
Probability calibration
1.00
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
0.87
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.131
Well Within Noise
00.2610.6

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456
KR Reykjavik36.00%27.00%23.00%6.00%4.00%4.00%
IA Akranes24.00%29.00%17.00%20.00%7.00%3.00%
Valur Reykjavik25.00%17.00%24.00%16.00%10.00%8.00%
Fram Reykjavik11.00%13.00%17.00%18.00%25.00%16.00%
Keflavik IF2.00%5.00%10.00%17.00%22.00%44.00%
IBA Akureyri2.00%9.00%9.00%23.00%32.00%25.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
IA Akranes 97.00% 3.00%
KR Reykjavik 96.00% 4.00%
Valur Reykjavik 92.00% 8.00%
Fram Reykjavik 84.00% 16.00%
IBA Akureyri 75.00% 25.00%
Keflavik IF 56.00% 44.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1963-05-23 IBA Akureyri W 1-033.8 966 940 63.96% 14.12% 21.92%+0.65 +24.1 2
1963-05-23 @ Fram Reykjavik L 0-133.8 940 966 21.92% 14.12% 63.96%-0.65 -24.1 0
1963-05-23 KR Reykjavik W 2-139.0 960 968 60.34% 14.13% 25.53%+0.47 +26.1 2
1963-05-23 @ IA Akranes L 1-239.0 968 960 25.53% 14.13% 60.34%-0.47 -26.1 0
1963-05-26 Keflavik IF W 1-032.5 990 917 68.35% 14.10% 17.55%+0.91 +19.7 4
1963-05-26 @ Fram Reykjavik L 0-132.5 917 990 17.55% 14.10% 68.35%-0.91 -19.7 0
1963-05-26 IBA Akureyri W 3-132.3 986 916 68.09% 14.10% 17.81%+0.89 +32.6 4
1963-05-26 @ IA Akranes L 1-332.3 916 986 17.81% 14.10% 68.09%-0.89 -32.6 0
1963-05-27 KR Reykjavik W 3-025.2 972 942 64.36% 14.12% 21.52%+0.67 +65.0 2
1963-05-27 @ Valur Reykjavik L 0-325.2 942 972 21.52% 14.12% 64.36%-0.67 -65.0 0
1963-06-01 Valur Reykjavik L 1-249.1 1018 1037 59.24% 14.13% 26.62%+0.42 -55.5 4
1963-06-01 @ IA Akranes W 2-149.1 1037 1018 26.62% 14.13% 59.24%-0.42 +55.5 4
1963-06-03 IBA Akureyri L 2-450.4 897 883 62.77% 14.13% 23.10%+0.59 -91.0 0
1963-06-03 @ Keflavik IF W 4-250.4 883 897 23.10% 14.13% 62.77%-0.59 +91.0 2
1963-06-14 Valur Reykjavik W 1-037.6 1010 1092 51.24% 14.14% 34.62%+0.07 +36.3 6
1963-06-14 @ Fram Reykjavik L 0-137.6 1092 1010 34.62% 14.14% 51.24%-0.07 -36.4 4
1963-06-16 IA Akranes W 2-144.8 806 963 40.91% 14.14% 44.96%-0.33 +43.0 2
1963-06-16 @ Keflavik IF L 1-244.8 963 806 44.96% 14.14% 40.91%+0.33 -43.0 4
1963-06-20 Fram Reykjavik W 2-036.3 877 1046 39.19% 14.13% 46.67%-0.40 +88.9 2
1963-06-20 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-236.3 1046 877 46.67% 14.13% 39.19%+0.40 -88.8 6
1963-06-23 Fram Reykjavik W 5-236.0 920 957 57.03% 14.14% 28.83%+0.31 +61.8 6
1963-06-23 @ IA Akranes L 2-536.0 957 920 28.83% 14.14% 57.03%-0.31 -61.8 6
1963-06-23 IBA Akureyri D 4-468.0 1056 974 69.06% 14.10% 16.84%+0.96 -7.0 5
1963-06-23 @ Valur Reykjavik D 4-468.0 974 1056 16.84% 14.10% 69.06%-0.96 +7.0 3
1963-06-24 Keflavik IF W 3-240.4 966 849 71.77% 14.08% 14.15%+1.15 +14.4 4
1963-06-24 @ KR Reykjavik L 2-340.4 849 966 14.15% 14.08% 71.77%-1.15 -14.4 2
1963-06-28 IBA Akureyri D 2-260.7 980 981 61.18% 14.13% 24.69%+0.51 -6.5 5
1963-06-28 @ KR Reykjavik D 2-260.7 981 980 24.69% 14.13% 61.18%-0.51 +6.5 4
1963-06-29 IA Akranes D 2-260.7 895 982 50.71% 14.14% 35.15%+0.05 -2.7 7
1963-06-29 @ Fram Reykjavik D 2-260.7 982 895 35.15% 14.14% 50.71%-0.05 +2.7 7
1963-06-30 Valur Reykjavik W 2-140.9 988 1049 54.07% 14.14% 31.79%+0.18 +31.8 6
1963-06-30 @ IBA Akureyri L 1-240.9 1049 988 31.79% 14.14% 54.07%-0.18 -31.8 5
1963-06-30 KR Reykjavik L 1-244.3 835 974 43.43% 14.14% 42.43%-0.24 -41.7 2
1963-06-30 @ Keflavik IF W 2-144.3 974 835 42.43% 14.14% 43.43%+0.24 +41.7 7
1963-07-06 Keflavik IF W 4-234.4 984 793 76.32% 14.03% 9.65%+1.55 +16.4 9
1963-07-06 @ IA Akranes L 2-434.4 793 984 9.65% 14.03% 76.32%-1.55 -16.4 2
1963-07-14 Fram Reykjavik L 1-253.0 1020 892 72.51% 14.07% 13.42%+1.20 -68.2 6
1963-07-14 @ IBA Akureyri W 2-153.0 892 1020 13.42% 14.07% 72.51%-1.20 +68.2 9
1963-07-14 IA Akranes W 3-133.9 1016 1001 62.86% 14.13% 23.01%+0.59 +41.2 9
1963-07-14 @ KR Reykjavik L 1-333.9 1001 1016 23.01% 14.13% 62.86%-0.59 -41.2 9
1963-07-21 IA Akranes L 1-345.1 952 960 60.40% 14.13% 25.47%+0.47 -97.9 6
1963-07-21 @ IBA Akureyri W 3-145.1 960 952 25.47% 14.13% 60.40%-0.47 +97.9 11
1963-07-21 Fram Reykjavik W 2-036.9 777 961 37.11% 14.13% 48.76%-0.48 +92.4 4
1963-07-21 @ Keflavik IF L 0-236.9 961 777 48.76% 14.13% 37.11%+0.48 -92.4 9
1963-07-28 Keflavik IF W 3-130.6 1017 869 73.85% 14.06% 12.09%+1.32 +22.7 7
1963-07-28 @ Valur Reykjavik L 1-330.6 869 1017 12.09% 14.06% 73.85%-1.32 -22.7 4
1963-08-01 Valur Reykjavik D 1-156.0 847 1040 35.84% 14.13% 50.03%-0.53 +3.3 5
1963-08-01 @ Keflavik IF D 1-156.0 1040 847 50.03% 14.13% 35.84%+0.53 -3.3 8
1963-08-11 Valur Reykjavik W 7-230.9 1057 1036 63.44% 14.12% 22.44%+0.63 +75.4 11
1963-08-11 @ KR Reykjavik L 2-730.9 1036 1057 22.44% 14.12% 63.44%-0.63 -75.4 8
1963-08-11 Keflavik IF L 0-240.8 854 850 61.69% 14.13% 24.18%+0.53 -115.4 6
1963-08-11 @ IBA Akureyri W 2-040.8 850 854 24.18% 14.13% 61.69%-0.53 +115.4 7
1963-08-18 IA Akranes L 1-341.8 961 1058 49.39% 14.14% 36.47%-0.01 -81.0 8
1963-08-18 @ Valur Reykjavik W 3-141.8 1058 961 36.47% 14.14% 49.39%+0.01 +81.0 13
1963-08-19 KR Reykjavik L 2-535.4 868 1132 26.94% 14.10% 58.96%-0.92 -58.2 9
1963-08-19 @ Fram Reykjavik W 5-235.4 1132 868 58.96% 14.10% 26.94%+0.92 +58.2 13
1963-08-25 KR Reykjavik L 1-234.6 738 1190 10.95% 13.97% 75.08%-1.94 -11.9 6
1963-08-25 @ IBA Akureyri W 2-134.6 1190 738 75.08% 13.97% 10.95%+1.94 +11.9 15
1963-08-25 Fram Reykjavik W 3-024.0 880 810 68.11% 14.10% 17.79%+0.89 +54.6 10
1963-08-25 @ Valur Reykjavik L 0-324.0 810 880 17.79% 14.10% 68.11%-0.89 -54.6 9

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1963-07-14 13.42% Fram Reykjavik 892 2 @ IBA Akureyri 1020 1
2 1963-06-03 23.10% IBA Akureyri 883 4 @ Keflavik IF 897 2
3 1963-08-11 24.18% Keflavik IF 850 2 @ IBA Akureyri 854 0
4 1963-07-21 25.47% IA Akranes 960 3 @ IBA Akureyri 952 1
5 1963-06-01 26.62% Valur Reykjavik 1037 2 @ IA Akranes 1018 1
6 1963-08-18 36.47% IA Akranes 1058 3 @ Valur Reykjavik 961 1
7 1963-07-21 37.11% @ Keflavik IF 777 2 Fram Reykjavik 961 0
8 1963-06-20 39.19% @ KR Reykjavik 877 2 Fram Reykjavik 1046 0
9 1963-06-16 40.91% @ Keflavik IF 806 2 IA Akranes 963 1
10 1963-06-30 42.43% KR Reykjavik 974 2 @ Keflavik IF 835 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1963-08-11 115.44 Keflavik IF 2 850 24.18% @ IBA Akureyri 0 854 61.69% 14.13%
2 1963-07-21 97.90 IA Akranes 3 960 25.47% @ IBA Akureyri 1 952 60.40% 14.13%
3 1963-07-21 92.40 @ Keflavik IF 2 777 37.11% Fram Reykjavik 0 961 48.76% 14.13%
4 1963-06-03 90.98 IBA Akureyri 4 883 23.10% @ Keflavik IF 2 897 62.77% 14.13%
5 1963-06-20 88.85 @ KR Reykjavik 2 877 39.19% Fram Reykjavik 0 1046 46.67% 14.13%
6 1963-08-18 80.96 IA Akranes 3 1058 36.47% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 961 49.39% 14.14%
7 1963-08-11 75.35 @ KR Reykjavik 7 1057 63.44% Valur Reykjavik 2 1036 22.44% 14.12%
8 1963-07-14 68.17 Fram Reykjavik 2 892 13.42% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1020 72.51% 14.07%
9 1963-05-27 65.03 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 972 64.36% KR Reykjavik 0 942 21.52% 14.12%
10 1963-06-23 61.83 @ IA Akranes 5 920 57.03% Fram Reykjavik 2 957 28.83% 14.14%
11 1963-08-19 58.17 KR Reykjavik 5 1132 58.96% @ Fram Reykjavik 2 868 26.94% 14.10%
12 1963-06-01 55.47 Valur Reykjavik 2 1037 26.62% @ IA Akranes 1 1018 59.24% 14.13%
13 1963-08-25 54.57 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 880 68.11% Fram Reykjavik 0 810 17.79% 14.10%
14 1963-06-16 42.99 @ Keflavik IF 2 806 40.91% IA Akranes 1 963 44.96% 14.14%
15 1963-06-30 41.72 KR Reykjavik 2 974 42.43% @ Keflavik IF 1 835 43.43% 14.14%
16 1963-07-14 41.21 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1016 62.86% IA Akranes 1 1001 23.01% 14.13%
17 1963-06-14 36.35 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1010 51.24% Valur Reykjavik 0 1092 34.62% 14.14%
18 1963-05-26 32.58 @ IA Akranes 3 986 68.09% IBA Akureyri 1 916 17.81% 14.10%
19 1963-06-30 31.79 @ IBA Akureyri 2 988 54.07% Valur Reykjavik 1 1049 31.79% 14.14%
20 1963-05-23 26.14 @ IA Akranes 2 960 60.34% KR Reykjavik 1 968 25.53% 14.13%
21 1963-05-23 24.15 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 966 63.96% IBA Akureyri 0 940 21.92% 14.12%
22 1963-07-28 22.67 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1017 73.85% Keflavik IF 1 869 12.09% 14.06%
23 1963-05-26 19.68 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 990 68.35% Keflavik IF 0 917 17.55% 14.10%
24 1963-07-06 16.35 @ IA Akranes 4 984 76.32% Keflavik IF 2 793 9.65% 14.03%
25 1963-06-24 14.41 @ KR Reykjavik 3 966 71.77% Keflavik IF 2 849 14.15% 14.08%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1963-06-23 68.0 @ Valur Reykjavik 4 1056 69.06% IBA Akureyri 4 974 16.84% 14.10%
2 1963-06-28 60.7 @ KR Reykjavik 2 980 61.18% IBA Akureyri 2 981 24.69% 14.13%
3 1963-06-29 60.7 @ Fram Reykjavik 2 895 50.71% IA Akranes 2 982 35.15% 14.14%
4 1963-08-01 56.0 @ Keflavik IF 1 847 35.84% Valur Reykjavik 1 1040 50.03% 14.13%
5 1963-07-14 53.0 Fram Reykjavik 2 892 13.42% @ IBA Akureyri 1 1020 72.51% 14.07%
6 1963-06-03 50.4 IBA Akureyri 4 883 23.10% @ Keflavik IF 2 897 62.77% 14.13%
7 1963-06-01 49.1 Valur Reykjavik 2 1037 26.62% @ IA Akranes 1 1018 59.24% 14.13%
8 1963-07-21 45.1 IA Akranes 3 960 25.47% @ IBA Akureyri 1 952 60.40% 14.13%
9 1963-06-16 44.8 @ Keflavik IF 2 806 40.91% IA Akranes 1 963 44.96% 14.14%
10 1963-06-30 44.3 KR Reykjavik 2 974 42.43% @ Keflavik IF 1 835 43.43% 14.14%
11 1963-08-18 41.8 IA Akranes 3 1058 36.47% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 961 49.39% 14.14%
12 1963-06-30 40.9 @ IBA Akureyri 2 988 54.07% Valur Reykjavik 1 1049 31.79% 14.14%
13 1963-08-11 40.8 Keflavik IF 2 850 24.18% @ IBA Akureyri 0 854 61.69% 14.13%
14 1963-06-24 40.4 @ KR Reykjavik 3 966 71.77% Keflavik IF 2 849 14.15% 14.08%
15 1963-05-23 39.0 @ IA Akranes 2 960 60.34% KR Reykjavik 1 968 25.53% 14.13%
16 1963-06-14 37.6 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1010 51.24% Valur Reykjavik 0 1092 34.62% 14.14%
17 1963-07-21 36.9 @ Keflavik IF 2 777 37.11% Fram Reykjavik 0 961 48.76% 14.13%
18 1963-06-20 36.3 @ KR Reykjavik 2 877 39.19% Fram Reykjavik 0 1046 46.67% 14.13%
19 1963-06-23 36.0 @ IA Akranes 5 920 57.03% Fram Reykjavik 2 957 28.83% 14.14%
20 1963-08-19 35.4 KR Reykjavik 5 1132 58.96% @ Fram Reykjavik 2 868 26.94% 14.10%
21 1963-08-25 34.6 KR Reykjavik 2 1190 75.08% @ IBA Akureyri 1 738 10.95% 13.97%
22 1963-07-06 34.4 @ IA Akranes 4 984 76.32% Keflavik IF 2 793 9.65% 14.03%
23 1963-07-14 33.9 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1016 62.86% IA Akranes 1 1001 23.01% 14.13%
24 1963-05-23 33.8 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 966 63.96% IBA Akureyri 0 940 21.92% 14.12%
25 1963-05-26 32.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 990 68.35% Keflavik IF 0 917 17.55% 14.10%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1963-08-25 24.0 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 880 68.11% Fram Reykjavik 0 810 17.79% 14.10%
2 1963-05-27 25.2 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 972 64.36% KR Reykjavik 0 942 21.52% 14.12%
3 1963-07-28 30.6 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 1017 73.85% Keflavik IF 1 869 12.09% 14.06%
4 1963-08-11 30.9 @ KR Reykjavik 7 1057 63.44% Valur Reykjavik 2 1036 22.44% 14.12%
5 1963-05-26 32.3 @ IA Akranes 3 986 68.09% IBA Akureyri 1 916 17.81% 14.10%
6 1963-05-26 32.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 990 68.35% Keflavik IF 0 917 17.55% 14.10%
7 1963-05-23 33.8 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 966 63.96% IBA Akureyri 0 940 21.92% 14.12%
8 1963-07-14 33.9 @ KR Reykjavik 3 1016 62.86% IA Akranes 1 1001 23.01% 14.13%
9 1963-07-06 34.4 @ IA Akranes 4 984 76.32% Keflavik IF 2 793 9.65% 14.03%
10 1963-08-25 34.6 KR Reykjavik 2 1190 75.08% @ IBA Akureyri 1 738 10.95% 13.97%
11 1963-08-19 35.4 KR Reykjavik 5 1132 58.96% @ Fram Reykjavik 2 868 26.94% 14.10%
12 1963-06-23 36.0 @ IA Akranes 5 920 57.03% Fram Reykjavik 2 957 28.83% 14.14%
13 1963-06-20 36.3 @ KR Reykjavik 2 877 39.19% Fram Reykjavik 0 1046 46.67% 14.13%
14 1963-07-21 36.9 @ Keflavik IF 2 777 37.11% Fram Reykjavik 0 961 48.76% 14.13%
15 1963-06-14 37.6 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 1010 51.24% Valur Reykjavik 0 1092 34.62% 14.14%
16 1963-05-23 39.0 @ IA Akranes 2 960 60.34% KR Reykjavik 1 968 25.53% 14.13%
17 1963-06-24 40.4 @ KR Reykjavik 3 966 71.77% Keflavik IF 2 849 14.15% 14.08%
18 1963-08-11 40.8 Keflavik IF 2 850 24.18% @ IBA Akureyri 0 854 61.69% 14.13%
19 1963-06-30 40.9 @ IBA Akureyri 2 988 54.07% Valur Reykjavik 1 1049 31.79% 14.14%
20 1963-08-18 41.8 IA Akranes 3 1058 36.47% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 961 49.39% 14.14%
21 1963-06-30 44.3 KR Reykjavik 2 974 42.43% @ Keflavik IF 1 835 43.43% 14.14%
22 1963-06-16 44.8 @ Keflavik IF 2 806 40.91% IA Akranes 1 963 44.96% 14.14%
23 1963-07-21 45.1 IA Akranes 3 960 25.47% @ IBA Akureyri 1 952 60.40% 14.13%
24 1963-06-01 49.1 Valur Reykjavik 2 1037 26.62% @ IA Akranes 1 1018 59.24% 14.13%
25 1963-06-03 50.4 IBA Akureyri 4 883 23.10% @ Keflavik IF 2 897 62.77% 14.13%