‹ ›

1964 Úrvalsdeild Season

30 games

Final

Champion

Keflavik IF

15 points · 1st Title

Relegated

Throttur Reykjavik

via playoff

Biggest Overachiever

Keflavik IF

4.47 points above expected

15 points · 10.53 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Valur Reykjavik

1.76 points below expected

8 points · 9.76 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Keflavik IF Champion 10 6 3 1 15 25 13 +12 10.53 +4.47
2 IA Akranes 10 6 0 4 12 27 21 +6 11.97 +0.03
3 KR Reykjavik 10 4 3 3 11 16 15 +1 12.03 -1.03
4 Valur Reykjavik 10 3 2 5 8 19 24 -5 9.76 -1.76
5 Fram Reykjavik 10 2 3 5 7 16 20 -4 7.92 -0.92
6 Throttur Reykjavik Relegated 10 2 3 5 7 14 24 -10 7.79 -0.79

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Keflavik IF 15 10.53 +4.47
2 IA Akranes 12 11.97 +0.03
3 Throttur Reykjavik 7 7.79 -0.79
4 Fram Reykjavik 7 7.92 -0.92
5 KR Reykjavik 11 12.03 -1.03

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Valur Reykjavik 8 9.76 -1.76
2 KR Reykjavik 11 12.03 -1.03
3 Fram Reykjavik 7 7.92 -0.92
4 Throttur Reykjavik 7 7.79 -0.79
5 IA Akranes 12 11.97 +0.03

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Keflavik IF 3 May 20 – Jun 14 1 in 14
2 KR Reykjavik 2 May 20 – Jun 10 1 in 4
3 IA Akranes 2 May 20 – May 28 1 in 3
4 Throttur Reykjavik 1 May 27 – May 27 1 in 3
5 Fram Reykjavik 1 Jun 19 – Jun 19 51%

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 IA Akranes 2 Jul 12 – Aug 30 1 in 33
2 Valur Reykjavik 2 May 20 – May 27 1 in 7
3 Fram Reykjavik 3 May 20 – May 31 1 in 7
4 Throttur Reykjavik 2 Jun 10 – Jun 19 1 in 3
5 KR Reykjavik 1 Jun 14 – Jun 14 1 in 2

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Fram Reykjavik 4 Jul 2 – Aug 27 1 in 13
2 Keflavik IF 5 May 20 – Jul 2 1 in 6
3 Valur Reykjavik 3 Jul 6 – Jul 29 1 in 5
4 KR Reykjavik 4 Jul 15 – Sep 20 1 in 5
5 Throttur Reykjavik 2 Sep 6 – Sep 12 1 in 3

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 KR Reykjavik 4 Aug 27 – Sep 27 1 in 11
2 IA Akranes 2 Jul 12 – Aug 30 1 in 6
3 Throttur Reykjavik 7 Jun 10 – Sep 6 1 in 6
4 Keflavik IF 3 Jun 23 – Jul 15 1 in 6
5 Valur Reykjavik 3 Jul 13 – Sep 5 1 in 5

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Keflavik IF 898 15 +18 7 5.0 +2.0
IA Akranes 912 12 +2 6 6.1 -0.1
KR Reykjavik 913 11 -11 5 5.9 -0.9
Valur Reykjavik 831 8 -6 4 4.2 -0.2
Fram Reykjavik 782 7 +13 5 4.2 +0.8
Throttur Reykjavik 745 7 -9 4 4.1 -0.1

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team FR IA KR KI TR VR
Fram Reykjavik —
1-0-1
1.77
0-1-1
1.76
0-1-1
2.06
1-0-1
2.96
0-1-1
2.35
IA Akranes
1-0-1
3.77
—
2-0-0
2.58
0-0-2
3.07
2-0-0
3.84
1-0-1
3.33
KR Reykjavik
1-1-0
3.79
0-0-2
2.93
—
1-1-0
3.01
1-1-0
3.97
1-0-1
3.37
Keflavik IF
1-1-0
3.46
2-0-0
2.45
0-1-1
2.51
—
1-1-0
3.68
2-0-0
3.03
Throttur Reykjavik
1-0-1
2.55
0-0-2
1.70
0-1-1
1.58
0-1-1
1.86
—
1-1-0
2.13
Valur Reykjavik
1-1-0
3.16
1-0-1
2.18
1-0-1
2.16
0-0-2
2.48
0-1-1
3.40
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.61 +4.7
Allowed 0.61 -5.5
Differential 0.93 +3.9

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
013.33%5.00%1.67%—1.67%—21.67%
15.00%3.33%5.00%6.67%5.00%1.67%26.67%
21.67%5.00%6.67%3.33%3.33%1.67%21.67%
3—6.67%3.33%——1.67%11.67%
41.67%5.00%3.33%———10.00%
5+—1.67%1.67%1.67%—3.33%8.33%
Total21.67%26.67%21.67%11.67%10.00%8.33%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.95 1.95 +0.00
SD 1.76 1.76 2.16
CV 0.90 0.90 —
Max 7 7 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 30

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
030.00%10.00%————40.00%
110.00%—10.00%———20.00%
2———10.00%——10.00%
3—————10.00%10.00%
4—10.00%————10.00%
5+—————10.00%10.00%
Total40.00%20.00%10.00%10.00%—20.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.60 2.00 -0.40
SD 1.84 2.58 1.78
CV 1.15 1.29 —
Max 5 7 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——10.00%———10.00%
1———20.00%10.00%—30.00%
2———————
3—20.00%10.00%———30.00%
4—10.00%10.00%———20.00%
5+——10.00%———10.00%
Total—30.00%40.00%20.00%10.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.70 2.10 +0.60
SD 2.06 0.99 2.67
CV 0.76 0.47 —
Max 7 4 +5
Min 0 1 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%10.00%————20.00%
110.00%10.00%——10.00%—30.00%
2—10.00%10.00%—10.00%—30.00%
3——10.00%———10.00%
410.00%—————10.00%
5+———————
Total30.00%30.00%20.00%—20.00%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.60 1.50 +0.10
SD 1.26 1.51 1.91
CV 0.79 1.01 —
Max 4 4 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
020.00%—————20.00%
1—10.00%————10.00%
210.00%10.00%—10.00%——30.00%
3—10.00%————10.00%
4—10.00%————10.00%
5+—10.00%———10.00%20.00%
Total30.00%50.00%—10.00%—10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.50 1.30 +1.20
SD 2.01 1.57 1.55
CV 0.81 1.21 —
Max 6 5 +4
Min 0 0 -1

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%10.00%——10.00%—30.00%
1——10.00%10.00%——20.00%
2—10.00%20.00%——10.00%40.00%
3———————
4——10.00%———10.00%
5+———————
Total10.00%20.00%40.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.40 2.40 -1.00
SD 1.26 1.96 2.16
CV 0.90 0.81 —
Max 4 7 +2
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 10

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
010.00%—————10.00%
110.00%—10.00%10.00%10.00%10.00%50.00%
2——10.00%—10.00%—20.00%
3—10.00%————10.00%
4———————
5+———10.00%——10.00%
Total20.00%10.00%20.00%20.00%20.00%10.00%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.90 2.40 -0.50
SD 1.97 1.71 2.42
CV 1.04 0.71 —
Max 7 5 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 10

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
KR Reykjavik 913 11 12.03 -1.03 45.0% 6 8 10 12 14 17 19
IA Akranes 912 12 11.97 +0.03 63.0% 5 8 10 12 14 16 18
Keflavik IF 898 15 10.53 +4.47 97.0% 4 6 9 10 12 15 17
Valur Reykjavik 831 8 9.76 -1.76 33.0% 3 5 8 10 11 14 17
Fram Reykjavik 782 7 7.92 -0.92 44.0% 3 4 6 8 10 13 16
Throttur Reykjavik 745 7 7.79 -0.79 48.0% 1 3 6 8 10 12 13

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 4.5% * Slight Edge: 4.5% to 11% * Clear Edge: 11% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+16.67%
Strong Edge
46.67%23.33%30.00%
Elo Value
Home Edge
175 Elo
0.006 goals per Elo point
058.45500
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.30 goals
Neutral
-2+0.33+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd * Longshot: 4th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.07 * Tight Race: 0.07 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.33 * Runaway: 0.33 and up.
Title-Race Openness
3.7
Open
12346
Champion Preseason Odds
21%
Keflavik IF, 3rd of 6
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.30/gm
Comfortable
00.190.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.11 * Some Luck: 2.11 to 3.17 * Lucky: 3.17 to 4.22 * Wild Swing: 4.22 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 0.96 * Close: 0.96 to 1.45 * Off: 1.45 to 1.93 * Way Off: 1.93 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 6 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 6 * As Expected: 6 to 9.6 * Several Outliers: 9.6 to 13.2 * Many Outliers: 13.2 and up.
Unexpected Relegations
Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 0.64 * A Surprise: 0.64 to 1.02 * Several Surprises: 1.02 to 1.41 * Many Surprises: 1.41 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
2.07 points
As Expected
02.647
Average Finish Error
Expected
0.67
Pinpoint
01.212.5
Biggest Overachiever
Expected
97.00%
Keflavik IF
5091.67%100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected
33.00%
Valur Reykjavik
08.33%50
Season Outliers
Expected
1 of 6
Minimal Outliers
00.66
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
1 of 1
A Surprise
00.61

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.16 * Even: 0.16 to 0.18 * Top-Heavy: 0.18 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.65 * Strong Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Wide Separation: 1.85 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 63% * Slight Edge: 63% to 69% * Clear Edge: 69% to 75.5% * Wide Edge: 75.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 80.5% * Clear Edge: 80.5% to 88.5% * Strong Edge: 88.5% to 94% * Dominant: 94% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 55% * Some Drama: 55% to 61% * Frequent: 61% to 65% * Very Frequent: 65% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 14.5% * Occasional: 14.5% to 18% * Frequent: 18% to 22% * Very Frequent: 22% and up.
Gini Index
0.16
Even
00.160.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 71.96
1.16
Coin-Flip Parity
0.71.351.652.5
Interquartile Edge
66%
Slight Edge
50%63%69%75.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
72%
Even
50%76%100%
Close Games
Expected
53%
Few
0%51%100%
Blowouts
Expected
23%
Very Frequent
0%25%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.28 * Slight Separation: 0.28 to 0.36 * Notable Separation: 0.36 to 0.41 * Lopsided: 0.41 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.33 * Some Carryover: 0.33 to 0.59 * Strong Carryover: 0.59 to 0.75 * Near-Lock: 0.75 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24.5% * Upset-Prone: 24.5% to 29% * Very Upset-Prone: 29% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 16% * As Expected: 16% to 21.5% * Shaky Favorites: 21.5% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.61
Predictable
00.602
Matchup Imbalance
0.34
Slight Separation
00.280.360.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.63
Very Predictable
01.002
Repeatability
0.75
Near-Lock
00.330.590.751
Upset Rate
Expected
20%
Chalky
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
25%
Very Shaky
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.28 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.28 to 0.42 * Above Noise: 0.42 to 0.56 * Well Above Noise: 0.56 and up.
Probability calibration
0.87
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.05
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.204
Well Within Noise
00.2790.8

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456
Keflavik IF21.00%18.00%23.00%19.00%11.00%8.00%
IA Akranes32.00%31.00%21.00%8.00%8.00%—
KR Reykjavik34.00%21.00%16.00%17.00%8.00%4.00%
Valur Reykjavik9.00%15.00%24.00%19.00%16.00%17.00%
Fram Reykjavik2.00%9.00%9.00%17.00%27.00%36.00%
Throttur Reykjavik2.00%6.00%7.00%20.00%30.00%35.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Direct relegation
IA Akranes 100% —
KR Reykjavik 96.00% 4.00%
Keflavik IF 92.00% 8.00%
Valur Reykjavik 83.00% 17.00%
Throttur Reykjavik 65.00% 35.00%
Fram Reykjavik 64.00% 36.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1964-05-20 Throttur Reykjavik W 3-133.6 912 759 65.29% 21.68% 13.03%+1.21 +2.8 2
1964-05-20 @ IA Akranes L 1-333.6 759 912 13.03% 21.68% 65.29%-1.21 -2.8 0
1964-05-20 Fram Reykjavik W 6-549.4 860 779 58.52% 23.35% 18.13%+0.80 +2.0 2
1964-05-20 @ Keflavik IF L 5-649.4 779 860 18.13% 23.35% 58.52%-0.80 -2.0 0
1964-05-20 KR Reykjavik L 1-245.9 846 924 39.07% 24.72% 36.21%-0.11 -4.2 0
1964-05-20 @ Valur Reykjavik W 2-145.9 924 846 36.21% 24.72% 39.07%+0.11 +4.2 2
1964-05-27 Valur Reykjavik W 4-245.3 756 842 37.92% 24.69% 37.38%-0.16 +6.2 2
1964-05-27 @ Throttur Reykjavik L 2-445.3 842 756 37.38% 24.69% 37.92%+0.16 -6.2 0
1964-05-28 IA Akranes L 2-346.9 777 915 30.86% 24.28% 44.87%-0.46 -3.3 0
1964-05-28 @ Fram Reykjavik W 3-246.9 915 777 44.87% 24.28% 30.86%+0.46 +3.3 4
1964-05-31 IA Akranes W 2-037.1 862 919 42.02% 24.75% 33.24%+0.01 +7.4 4
1964-05-31 @ Keflavik IF L 0-237.1 919 862 33.24% 24.75% 42.02%-0.01 -7.4 4
1964-05-31 Fram Reykjavik W 7-335.6 836 773 56.51% 23.70% 19.80%+0.69 +5.9 2
1964-05-31 @ Valur Reykjavik L 3-735.6 773 836 19.80% 23.70% 56.51%-0.69 -5.9 0
1964-06-10 Throttur Reykjavik W 4-024.9 928 762 66.30% 21.36% 12.34%+1.28 +5.8 4
1964-06-10 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-424.9 762 928 12.34% 21.36% 66.30%-1.28 -5.8 2
1964-06-14 KR Reykjavik W 4-242.7 911 934 46.53% 24.65% 28.82%+0.21 +5.1 6
1964-06-14 @ IA Akranes L 2-442.7 934 911 28.82% 24.65% 46.53%-0.21 -5.1 4
1964-06-14 Keflavik IF L 1-441.2 841 870 45.80% 24.68% 29.52%+0.17 -11.6 2
1964-06-14 @ Valur Reykjavik W 4-141.2 870 841 29.52% 24.68% 45.80%-0.17 +11.6 6
1964-06-19 Throttur Reykjavik W 1-038.4 768 756 50.72% 24.39% 24.89%+0.40 +3.1 2
1964-06-19 @ Fram Reykjavik L 0-138.4 756 768 24.89% 24.39% 50.72%-0.40 -3.1 2
1964-06-21 IA Akranes W 3-141.8 830 916 37.83% 24.69% 37.48%-0.16 +7.0 4
1964-06-21 @ Valur Reykjavik L 1-341.8 916 830 37.48% 24.69% 37.83%+0.16 -7.0 6
1964-06-22 Fram Reykjavik W 1-033.9 929 771 65.65% 21.57% 12.78%+1.23 +1.7 6
1964-06-22 @ KR Reykjavik L 0-133.9 771 929 12.78% 21.57% 65.65%-1.23 -1.7 2
1964-06-23 Throttur Reykjavik D 0-050.2 881 753 63.00% 22.34% 14.66%+1.06 -1.4 7
1964-06-23 @ Keflavik IF D 0-050.2 753 881 14.66% 22.34% 63.00%-1.06 +1.4 3
1964-06-28 Valur Reykjavik W 3-135.9 909 837 57.60% 23.52% 18.89%+0.75 +4.0 8
1964-06-28 @ IA Akranes L 1-335.9 837 909 18.89% 23.52% 57.60%-0.75 -4.0 4
1964-07-02 Keflavik IF D 0-049.5 769 880 34.46% 24.55% 40.99%-0.30 +0.2 3
1964-07-02 @ Fram Reykjavik D 0-049.5 880 769 40.99% 24.55% 34.46%+0.30 -0.2 8
1964-07-05 IA Akranes L 2-735.4 755 913 28.42% 24.02% 47.57%-0.57 -10.5 3
1964-07-05 @ Throttur Reykjavik W 7-235.4 913 755 47.57% 24.02% 28.42%+0.57 +10.5 10
1964-07-06 Valur Reykjavik L 0-148.5 930 833 60.12% 23.03% 16.86%+0.89 -6.4 6
1964-07-06 @ KR Reykjavik W 1-048.5 833 930 16.86% 23.03% 60.12%-0.89 +6.4 6
1964-07-12 Fram Reykjavik L 1-446.2 924 769 65.37% 21.65% 12.97%+1.21 -15.9 10
1964-07-12 @ IA Akranes W 4-146.2 769 924 12.97% 21.65% 65.37%-1.21 +15.9 5
1964-07-13 Throttur Reykjavik D 2-256.2 839 744 59.89% 23.07% 17.04%+0.88 -0.8 7
1964-07-13 @ Valur Reykjavik D 2-256.2 744 839 17.04% 23.07% 59.89%-0.88 +0.8 4
1964-07-15 Keflavik IF W 3-244.0 924 880 54.55% 23.98% 21.47%+0.59 +2.5 8
1964-07-15 @ KR Reykjavik L 2-344.0 880 924 21.47% 23.98% 54.55%-0.59 -2.5 8
1964-07-29 Valur Reykjavik D 0-049.5 785 838 42.43% 24.75% 32.83%+0.03 -0.2 6
1964-07-29 @ Fram Reykjavik D 0-049.5 838 785 32.83% 24.75% 42.43%-0.03 +0.2 8
1964-07-30 Keflavik IF L 1-243.6 745 877 31.66% 24.35% 43.99%-0.42 -3.5 4
1964-07-30 @ Throttur Reykjavik W 2-143.6 877 745 43.99% 24.35% 31.66%+0.42 +3.5 10
1964-08-27 KR Reykjavik D 0-049.6 785 926 30.49% 24.24% 45.26%-0.47 +0.4 7
1964-08-27 @ Fram Reykjavik D 0-049.6 926 785 45.26% 24.24% 30.49%+0.47 -0.4 9
1964-08-30 Keflavik IF L 1-346.2 908 881 52.61% 24.21% 23.18%+0.49 -9.3 10
1964-08-30 @ IA Akranes W 3-146.2 881 908 23.18% 24.21% 52.61%-0.49 +9.3 12
1964-09-05 Valur Reykjavik W 5-131.6 890 839 55.33% 23.87% 20.79%+0.63 +7.9 14
1964-09-05 @ Keflavik IF L 1-531.6 839 890 20.79% 23.87% 55.33%-0.63 -8.0 8
1964-09-06 KR Reykjavik D 2-256.1 742 926 25.50% 23.60% 50.90%-0.72 +0.5 5
1964-09-06 @ Throttur Reykjavik D 2-256.1 926 742 50.90% 23.60% 25.50%+0.72 -0.5 10
1964-09-12 Fram Reykjavik W 2-143.6 742 785 43.79% 24.73% 31.48%+0.09 +3.5 7
1964-09-12 @ Throttur Reykjavik L 1-243.6 785 742 31.48% 24.73% 43.79%-0.09 -3.5 7
1964-09-20 KR Reykjavik D 1-152.3 898 925 45.87% 24.68% 29.45%+0.18 -0.4 15
1964-09-20 @ Keflavik IF D 1-152.3 925 898 29.45% 24.68% 45.87%-0.18 +0.4 11
1964-09-27 IA Akranes L 1-443.1 926 899 52.62% 24.21% 23.17%+0.49 -13.1 11
1964-09-27 @ KR Reykjavik W 4-143.1 899 926 23.17% 24.21% 52.62%-0.49 +13.1 12

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1964-07-12 12.97% Fram Reykjavik 769 4 @ IA Akranes 924 1
2 1964-07-06 16.86% Valur Reykjavik 833 1 @ KR Reykjavik 930 0
3 1964-09-27 23.17% IA Akranes 899 4 @ KR Reykjavik 926 1
4 1964-08-30 23.18% Keflavik IF 881 3 @ IA Akranes 908 1
5 1964-06-14 29.52% Keflavik IF 870 4 @ Valur Reykjavik 841 1
6 1964-05-20 36.21% KR Reykjavik 924 2 @ Valur Reykjavik 846 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1964-07-12 15.92 Fram Reykjavik 4 769 12.97% @ IA Akranes 1 924 65.37% 21.65%
2 1964-09-27 13.10 IA Akranes 4 899 23.17% @ KR Reykjavik 1 926 52.62% 24.21%
3 1964-06-14 11.61 Keflavik IF 4 870 29.52% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 841 45.80% 24.68%
4 1964-07-05 10.49 IA Akranes 7 913 47.57% @ Throttur Reykjavik 2 755 28.42% 24.02%
5 1964-08-30 9.26 Keflavik IF 3 881 23.18% @ IA Akranes 1 908 52.61% 24.21%
6 1964-09-05 7.95 @ Keflavik IF 5 890 55.33% Valur Reykjavik 1 839 20.79% 23.87%
7 1964-05-31 7.38 @ Keflavik IF 2 862 42.02% IA Akranes 0 919 33.24% 24.75%
8 1964-06-21 6.99 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 830 37.83% IA Akranes 1 916 37.48% 24.69%
9 1964-07-06 6.39 Valur Reykjavik 1 833 16.86% @ KR Reykjavik 0 930 60.12% 23.03%
10 1964-05-27 6.24 @ Throttur Reykjavik 4 756 37.92% Valur Reykjavik 2 842 37.38% 24.69%
11 1964-05-31 5.90 @ Valur Reykjavik 7 836 56.51% Fram Reykjavik 3 773 19.80% 23.70%
12 1964-06-10 5.81 @ KR Reykjavik 4 928 66.30% Throttur Reykjavik 0 762 12.34% 21.36%
13 1964-06-14 5.11 @ IA Akranes 4 911 46.53% KR Reykjavik 2 934 28.82% 24.65%
14 1964-05-20 4.17 KR Reykjavik 2 924 36.21% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 846 39.07% 24.72%
15 1964-06-28 3.99 @ IA Akranes 3 909 57.60% Valur Reykjavik 1 837 18.89% 23.52%
16 1964-07-30 3.54 Keflavik IF 2 877 43.99% @ Throttur Reykjavik 1 745 31.66% 24.35%
17 1964-09-12 3.54 @ Throttur Reykjavik 2 742 43.79% Fram Reykjavik 1 785 31.48% 24.73%
18 1964-05-28 3.29 IA Akranes 3 915 44.87% @ Fram Reykjavik 2 777 30.86% 24.28%
19 1964-06-19 3.11 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 768 50.72% Throttur Reykjavik 0 756 24.89% 24.39%
20 1964-05-20 2.80 @ IA Akranes 3 912 65.29% Throttur Reykjavik 1 759 13.03% 21.68%
21 1964-07-15 2.45 @ KR Reykjavik 3 924 54.55% Keflavik IF 2 880 21.47% 23.98%
22 1964-05-20 2.01 @ Keflavik IF 6 860 58.52% Fram Reykjavik 5 779 18.13% 23.35%
23 1964-06-22 1.68 @ KR Reykjavik 1 929 65.65% Fram Reykjavik 0 771 12.78% 21.57%
24 1964-06-23 1.36 @ Keflavik IF 0 881 63.00% Throttur Reykjavik 0 753 14.66% 22.34%
25 1964-07-13 0.80 @ Valur Reykjavik 2 839 59.89% Throttur Reykjavik 2 744 17.04% 23.07%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1964-07-13 56.2 @ Valur Reykjavik 2 839 59.89% Throttur Reykjavik 2 744 17.04% 23.07%
2 1964-09-06 56.1 @ Throttur Reykjavik 2 742 25.50% KR Reykjavik 2 926 50.90% 23.60%
3 1964-09-20 52.3 @ Keflavik IF 1 898 45.87% KR Reykjavik 1 925 29.45% 24.68%
4 1964-06-23 50.2 @ Keflavik IF 0 881 63.00% Throttur Reykjavik 0 753 14.66% 22.34%
5 1964-08-27 49.6 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 785 30.49% KR Reykjavik 0 926 45.26% 24.24%
6 1964-07-02 49.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 769 34.46% Keflavik IF 0 880 40.99% 24.55%
7 1964-07-29 49.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 785 42.43% Valur Reykjavik 0 838 32.83% 24.75%
8 1964-05-20 49.4 @ Keflavik IF 6 860 58.52% Fram Reykjavik 5 779 18.13% 23.35%
9 1964-07-06 48.5 Valur Reykjavik 1 833 16.86% @ KR Reykjavik 0 930 60.12% 23.03%
10 1964-05-28 46.9 IA Akranes 3 915 44.87% @ Fram Reykjavik 2 777 30.86% 24.28%
11 1964-07-12 46.2 Fram Reykjavik 4 769 12.97% @ IA Akranes 1 924 65.37% 21.65%
12 1964-08-30 46.2 Keflavik IF 3 881 23.18% @ IA Akranes 1 908 52.61% 24.21%
13 1964-05-20 45.9 KR Reykjavik 2 924 36.21% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 846 39.07% 24.72%
14 1964-05-27 45.3 @ Throttur Reykjavik 4 756 37.92% Valur Reykjavik 2 842 37.38% 24.69%
15 1964-07-15 44.0 @ KR Reykjavik 3 924 54.55% Keflavik IF 2 880 21.47% 23.98%
16 1964-07-30 43.6 Keflavik IF 2 877 43.99% @ Throttur Reykjavik 1 745 31.66% 24.35%
17 1964-09-12 43.6 @ Throttur Reykjavik 2 742 43.79% Fram Reykjavik 1 785 31.48% 24.73%
18 1964-09-27 43.1 IA Akranes 4 899 23.17% @ KR Reykjavik 1 926 52.62% 24.21%
19 1964-06-14 42.7 @ IA Akranes 4 911 46.53% KR Reykjavik 2 934 28.82% 24.65%
20 1964-06-21 41.8 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 830 37.83% IA Akranes 1 916 37.48% 24.69%
21 1964-06-14 41.2 Keflavik IF 4 870 29.52% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 841 45.80% 24.68%
22 1964-06-19 38.4 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 768 50.72% Throttur Reykjavik 0 756 24.89% 24.39%
23 1964-05-31 37.1 @ Keflavik IF 2 862 42.02% IA Akranes 0 919 33.24% 24.75%
24 1964-06-28 35.9 @ IA Akranes 3 909 57.60% Valur Reykjavik 1 837 18.89% 23.52%
25 1964-05-31 35.6 @ Valur Reykjavik 7 836 56.51% Fram Reykjavik 3 773 19.80% 23.70%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1964-06-10 24.9 @ KR Reykjavik 4 928 66.30% Throttur Reykjavik 0 762 12.34% 21.36%
2 1964-09-05 31.6 @ Keflavik IF 5 890 55.33% Valur Reykjavik 1 839 20.79% 23.87%
3 1964-05-20 33.6 @ IA Akranes 3 912 65.29% Throttur Reykjavik 1 759 13.03% 21.68%
4 1964-06-22 33.9 @ KR Reykjavik 1 929 65.65% Fram Reykjavik 0 771 12.78% 21.57%
5 1964-07-05 35.4 IA Akranes 7 913 47.57% @ Throttur Reykjavik 2 755 28.42% 24.02%
6 1964-05-31 35.6 @ Valur Reykjavik 7 836 56.51% Fram Reykjavik 3 773 19.80% 23.70%
7 1964-06-28 35.9 @ IA Akranes 3 909 57.60% Valur Reykjavik 1 837 18.89% 23.52%
8 1964-05-31 37.1 @ Keflavik IF 2 862 42.02% IA Akranes 0 919 33.24% 24.75%
9 1964-06-19 38.4 @ Fram Reykjavik 1 768 50.72% Throttur Reykjavik 0 756 24.89% 24.39%
10 1964-06-14 41.2 Keflavik IF 4 870 29.52% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 841 45.80% 24.68%
11 1964-06-21 41.8 @ Valur Reykjavik 3 830 37.83% IA Akranes 1 916 37.48% 24.69%
12 1964-06-14 42.7 @ IA Akranes 4 911 46.53% KR Reykjavik 2 934 28.82% 24.65%
13 1964-09-27 43.1 IA Akranes 4 899 23.17% @ KR Reykjavik 1 926 52.62% 24.21%
14 1964-07-30 43.6 Keflavik IF 2 877 43.99% @ Throttur Reykjavik 1 745 31.66% 24.35%
15 1964-09-12 43.6 @ Throttur Reykjavik 2 742 43.79% Fram Reykjavik 1 785 31.48% 24.73%
16 1964-07-15 44.0 @ KR Reykjavik 3 924 54.55% Keflavik IF 2 880 21.47% 23.98%
17 1964-05-27 45.3 @ Throttur Reykjavik 4 756 37.92% Valur Reykjavik 2 842 37.38% 24.69%
18 1964-05-20 45.9 KR Reykjavik 2 924 36.21% @ Valur Reykjavik 1 846 39.07% 24.72%
19 1964-07-12 46.2 Fram Reykjavik 4 769 12.97% @ IA Akranes 1 924 65.37% 21.65%
20 1964-08-30 46.2 Keflavik IF 3 881 23.18% @ IA Akranes 1 908 52.61% 24.21%
21 1964-05-28 46.9 IA Akranes 3 915 44.87% @ Fram Reykjavik 2 777 30.86% 24.28%
22 1964-07-06 48.5 Valur Reykjavik 1 833 16.86% @ KR Reykjavik 0 930 60.12% 23.03%
23 1964-05-20 49.4 @ Keflavik IF 6 860 58.52% Fram Reykjavik 5 779 18.13% 23.35%
24 1964-07-02 49.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 769 34.46% Keflavik IF 0 880 40.99% 24.55%
25 1964-07-29 49.5 @ Fram Reykjavik 0 785 42.43% Valur Reykjavik 0 838 32.83% 24.75%