2003-04 Luxembourg National Division Season

168 games

Final

Champion

Jeunesse Esch

58 points

Relegated

No relegation

Biggest Overachiever

Jeunesse Esch

13.01 points above expected

58 points · 44.99 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Mondercange

6.40 points below expected

18 points · 24.40 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	Jeunesse Esch	22	19	1	2	58	56	13	+43	44.99	+13.01
2	F91 Dudelange	22	14	4	4	46	52	19	+33	41.62	+4.38
3	Etzella Ettelbruck	22	12	8	2	44	56	29	+27	33.16	+10.84
4	Grevenmacher	22	11	3	8	36	47	33	+14	38.28	-2.28
5	Spora Luxembourg	22	12	0	10	36	49	48	+1	27.55	+8.45
6	Union Luxembourg	22	9	5	8	32	31	21	+10	34.67	-2.67
7	Swift Hesperange	22	8	1	13	25	28	41	-13	31.39	-6.39
8	Victoria Rosport	22	7	3	12	24	32	38	-6	28.91	-4.91
9	Avenir Beggen	22	5	5	12	20	20	46	-26	24.47	-4.47
10	Rumelange	22	4	6	12	18	28	55	-27	21.17	-3.17
11	Mondercange	22	5	3	14	18	24	52	-28	24.40	-6.40
12	Wiltz 71	22	5	3	14	18	20	48	-28	20.59	-2.59

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	Pts	GF	GA	GD	SimPts	vsSim
1	F91 Dudelange	6	4	1	1	13	10	7	+3	55.32	-42.32
2	Wiltz 71	6	2	4	0	10	11	6	+5	25.40	-15.40
3	Jeunesse Esch	6	3	1	2	10	14	10	+4	68.83	-58.83
4	Mondercange	6	2	3	1	9	8	6	+2	26.34	-17.34
5	Avenir Beggen	6	2	2	2	8	8	8	0	28.55	-20.55
6	Rumelange	6	2	2	2	8	9	11	-2	26.23	-18.23
7	Spora Luxembourg	6	2	2	2	8	7	9	-2	46.26	-38.26
8	Union Luxembourg	6	2	1	3	7	13	10	+3	46.75	-39.75
9	Swift Hesperange	6	2	1	3	7	6	6	0	35.58	-28.58
10	Grevenmacher	6	2	1	3	7	9	11	-2	42.04	-35.04
11	Victoria Rosport	6	2	1	3	7	6	12	-6	34.53	-27.53
12	Etzella Ettelbruck	6	1	1	4	4	7	12	-5	51.48	-47.48

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Jeunesse Esch	58	44.99	+13.01
2	Etzella Ettelbruck	44	33.16	+10.84
3	Spora Luxembourg	36	27.55	+8.45
4	F91 Dudelange	46	41.62	+4.38
5	Grevenmacher	36	38.28	-2.28

Biggest Disappointments

#	Team	Actual	Sim	vsSim
1	Mondercange	18	24.40	-6.40
2	Swift Hesperange	25	31.39	-6.39
3	Victoria Rosport	24	28.91	-4.91
4	Avenir Beggen	20	24.47	-4.47
5	Rumelange	18	21.17	-3.17

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Spora Luxembourg	5	Aug 10 – Sep 17	1 in 1,449
2	Etzella Ettelbruck	6	Nov 9 – Mar 14	1 in 132
3	Jeunesse Esch	9	Sep 17 – Nov 4	1 in 117
4	Avenir Beggen	2	Nov 29 – Dec 7	1 in 19
5	Wiltz 71	2	Nov 30 – Dec 3	1 in 8

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Spora Luxembourg	7	Nov 23 – Mar 27	1 in 230
2	Avenir Beggen	5	Oct 26 – Nov 23	1 in 46
3	Victoria Rosport	4	Sep 13 – Sep 27	1 in 36
4	Swift Hesperange	4	Dec 7 – Mar 21	1 in 33
5	Rumelange	6	Aug 10 – Sep 21	1 in 31

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Etzella Ettelbruck	9	Sep 14 – Oct 26	1 in 297
2	Rumelange	6	Sep 28 – Oct 26	1 in 90
3	Spora Luxembourg	5	Aug 10 – Sep 17	1 in 67
4	Avenir Beggen	5	Sep 27 – Oct 22	1 in 32
5	Jeunesse Esch	9	Sep 17 – Nov 4	1 in 9

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

#	Team	Games	Dates	Probability
1	Grevenmacher	5	Sep 28 – Oct 22	1 in 69
2	Avenir Beggen	9	Oct 1 – Nov 23	1 in 40
3	Mondercange	9	Sep 17 – Oct 31	1 in 21
4	Wiltz 71	8	Sep 21 – Nov 9	1 in 19
5	Spora Luxembourg	7	Nov 23 – Mar 27	1 in 18

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team	Elo	Season Pts	Elo Δ (5)	Points (5)	Expected (5)	Actual − Exp
Jeunesse Esch	1336	68	-4	7	9.0	-2.0
F91 Dudelange	1309	59	+58	13	7.9	+5.1
Etzella Ettelbruck	1174	48	-75	1	6.0	-5.0
Spora Luxembourg	930	44	-29	7	7.2	-0.2
Grevenmacher	1172	43	+22	7	5.1	+1.9
Union Luxembourg	1091	39	-29	6	10.5	-4.5
Swift Hesperange	940	32	-30	6	8.7	-2.7
Victoria Rosport	885	31	-109	4	6.5	-2.5
Wiltz 71	959	28	+93	9	6.7	+2.3
Avenir Beggen	919	28	+19	7	6.1	+0.9
Mondercange	935	27	+40	8	6.1	+1.9
Rumelange	908	26	+45	8	4.4	+3.6

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Team	AB	EE	FD	GRE	JE	MON	RUM	SL	SH	UL	VR	W7
Avenir Beggen	—	0-1-1 1.70	1-0-1 1.49	1-1-0 1.30	0-0-2 1.43	2-0-0 2.46	0-1-1 3.17	0-0-2 3.48	0-0-2 2.01	1-0-1 1.93	0-2-0 2.39	0-0-2 3.52
Etzella Ettelbruck	1-1-0 3.92	—	0-2-0 1.85	0-2-0 2.74	2-0-0 1.16	2-0-0 3.66	1-1-0 4.17	0-0-2 3.32	2-0-0 2.92	1-1-0 2.55	2-0-0 3.37	1-1-0 3.66
F91 Dudelange	1-0-1 4.15	0-2-0 3.76	—	0-0-2 3.02	0-1-1 2.47	2-0-0 4.55	2-0-0 4.10	2-0-0 3.77	2-0-0 3.91	1-1-0 3.31	2-0-0 3.62	2-0-0 4.51
Grevenmacher	0-1-1 4.33	0-2-0 2.88	2-0-0 2.59	—	0-0-2 2.15	1-0-1 4.14	2-0-0 4.16	1-0-1 3.88	2-0-0 3.32	1-0-1 3.18	0-0-2 3.81	2-0-0 4.20
Jeunesse Esch	2-0-0 4.21	0-0-2 4.48	1-1-0 3.14	2-0-0 3.46	—	2-0-0 4.36	2-0-0 4.50	2-0-0 4.33	2-0-0 3.79	2-0-0 3.98	2-0-0 4.14	2-0-0 4.89
Mondercange	0-0-2 3.15	0-0-2 1.97	0-0-2 1.09	1-0-1 1.49	0-0-2 1.27	—	0-2-0 2.92	0-0-2 3.47	0-0-2 2.51	1-1-0 1.73	1-0-1 2.11	2-0-0 3.33
Rumelange	1-1-0 2.44	0-1-1 1.46	0-0-2 1.52	0-0-2 1.46	0-0-2 1.15	0-2-0 2.69	—	0-0-2 2.45	1-1-0 1.58	0-1-1 1.53	1-0-1 2.19	1-0-1 2.63
Spora Luxembourg	2-0-0 2.13	2-0-0 2.30	0-0-2 1.84	1-0-1 1.74	0-0-2 1.30	2-0-0 2.16	2-0-0 3.16	—	0-0-2 2.62	1-0-1 1.96	2-0-0 2.61	0-0-2 3.70
Swift Hesperange	2-0-0 3.60	0-0-2 2.69	0-0-2 1.72	0-0-2 2.30	0-0-2 1.85	2-0-0 3.10	0-1-1 4.04	2-0-0 2.99	—	0-0-2 2.62	0-0-2 3.10	2-0-0 3.59
Union Luxembourg	1-0-1 3.68	0-1-1 3.06	0-1-1 2.31	1-0-1 2.43	0-0-2 1.64	0-1-1 3.90	1-1-0 4.09	1-0-1 3.66	2-0-0 2.99	—	2-0-0 3.31	1-1-0 3.92
Victoria Rosport	0-2-0 3.22	0-0-2 2.25	0-0-2 2.00	2-0-0 1.81	0-0-2 1.49	1-0-1 3.51	1-0-1 3.42	0-0-2 3.01	2-0-0 2.51	0-0-2 2.30	—	1-1-0 3.35
Wiltz 71	2-0-0 2.09	0-1-1 1.97	0-0-2 1.13	0-0-2 1.43	0-0-2 0.78	0-0-2 2.28	1-0-1 2.98	2-0-0 1.92	0-0-2 2.02	0-1-1 1.71	0-1-1 2.27	—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

	R²	Slope
Scored	0.86	+8.7
Allowed	0.73	-8.0
Differential	0.95	+5.0

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

View:

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	2.98%	5.36%	6.25%	4.17%	2.68%	1.19%	22.62%
1	5.36%	10.12%	7.74%	5.06%	2.08%	0.89%	31.25%
2	6.25%	7.74%	4.76%	2.98%	0.60%	1.19%	23.51%
3	4.17%	5.06%	2.98%	0.60%	0.30%	0.30%	13.39%
4	2.68%	2.08%	0.60%	0.30%	—	—	5.65%
5+	1.19%	0.89%	1.19%	0.30%	—	—	3.57%
Total	22.62%	31.25%	23.51%	13.39%	5.65%	3.57%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.64	1.64	+0.00
SD	1.49	1.49	2.33
CV	0.91	0.91	—
Max	8	8	+8
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 168

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	10.71%	10.71%	3.57%	—	3.57%	28.57%
1	10.71%	17.86%	10.71%	3.57%	—	3.57%	46.43%
2	7.14%	3.57%	7.14%	—	—	3.57%	21.43%
3	—	—	3.57%	—	—	—	3.57%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	17.86%	32.14%	32.14%	7.14%	—	10.71%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.00	1.93	-0.93
SD	0.82	2.04	2.29
CV	0.82	1.06	—
Max	3	8	+2
Min	0	0	-8

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
1	7.14%	14.29%	3.57%	3.57%	3.57%	—	32.14%
2	7.14%	3.57%	7.14%	3.57%	—	—	21.43%
3	10.71%	7.14%	—	3.57%	3.57%	3.57%	28.57%
4	—	3.57%	—	—	—	—	3.57%
5+	—	—	7.14%	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	32.14%	28.57%	17.86%	10.71%	7.14%	3.57%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.25	1.46	+0.79
SD	1.71	1.53	2.06
CV	0.76	1.04	—
Max	8	6	+6
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.57%	—	3.57%	—	—	—	7.14%
1	7.14%	14.29%	10.71%	—	—	—	32.14%
2	10.71%	10.71%	—	3.57%	—	—	25.00%
3	3.57%	10.71%	7.14%	—	—	—	21.43%
4	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
5+	3.57%	3.57%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	35.71%	39.29%	21.43%	3.57%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.21	0.93	+1.29
SD	1.66	0.86	2.00
CV	0.75	0.92	—
Max	8	3	+7
Min	0	0	-2

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	3.57%	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	17.86%
1	3.57%	3.57%	7.14%	7.14%	3.57%	—	25.00%
2	3.57%	14.29%	10.71%	3.57%	—	—	32.14%
3	—	7.14%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
4	7.14%	—	3.57%	—	—	—	10.71%
5+	3.57%	3.57%	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	17.86%	32.14%	28.57%	17.86%	3.57%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.00	1.57	+0.43
SD	1.78	1.10	2.50
CV	0.89	0.70	—
Max	8	4	+7
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	—	3.57%	—	—	3.57%
1	14.29%	3.57%	3.57%	3.57%	—	—	25.00%
2	10.71%	10.71%	3.57%	3.57%	—	—	28.57%
3	10.71%	7.14%	3.57%	—	—	—	21.43%
4	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
5+	7.14%	—	—	—	—	—	7.14%
Total	50.00%	28.57%	10.71%	10.71%	—	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.50	0.82	+1.68
SD	1.62	1.02	2.20
CV	0.65	1.24	—
Max	8	3	+8
Min	0	0	-3

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	3.57%	10.71%	10.71%	—	7.14%	3.57%	35.71%
1	3.57%	7.14%	—	7.14%	7.14%	—	25.00%
2	3.57%	7.14%	10.71%	3.57%	—	3.57%	28.57%
3	7.14%	3.57%	—	—	—	—	10.71%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	17.86%	28.57%	21.43%	10.71%	14.29%	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.14	2.07	-0.93
SD	1.04	1.84	2.28
CV	0.91	0.89	—
Max	3	8	+3
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	7.14%	3.57%	3.57%	3.57%	25.00%
1	3.57%	10.71%	7.14%	—	10.71%	3.57%	35.71%
2	—	3.57%	14.29%	—	—	3.57%	21.43%
3	3.57%	7.14%	3.57%	3.57%	—	—	17.86%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	7.14%	28.57%	32.14%	7.14%	14.29%	10.71%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.32	2.36	-1.04
SD	1.06	1.77	2.20
CV	0.80	0.75	—
Max	3	8	+3
Min	0	0	-6

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	—	7.14%	3.57%	—	3.57%	14.29%
1	—	7.14%	14.29%	3.57%	—	3.57%	28.57%
2	3.57%	17.86%	—	7.14%	—	—	28.57%
3	—	10.71%	—	—	—	—	10.71%
4	—	3.57%	3.57%	3.57%	—	—	10.71%
5+	—	3.57%	—	3.57%	—	—	7.14%
Total	3.57%	42.86%	25.00%	21.43%	—	7.14%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	2.00	2.04	-0.04
SD	1.54	1.57	2.44
CV	0.77	0.77	—
Max	6	8	+4
Min	0	0	-7

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	—	7.14%	10.71%	7.14%	7.14%	—	32.14%
1	3.57%	7.14%	14.29%	10.71%	—	—	35.71%
2	14.29%	3.57%	—	—	—	—	17.86%
3	3.57%	3.57%	3.57%	—	—	—	10.71%
4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5+	—	—	3.57%	—	—	—	3.57%
Total	21.43%	21.43%	32.14%	17.86%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.21	1.68	-0.46
SD	1.23	1.22	2.06
CV	1.01	0.73	—
Max	5	4	+3
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	14.29%	3.57%	—	3.57%	—	28.57%
1	7.14%	14.29%	7.14%	—	—	—	28.57%
2	3.57%	—	—	7.14%	3.57%	—	14.29%
3	10.71%	3.57%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
4	7.14%	7.14%	—	—	—	—	14.29%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	35.71%	39.29%	10.71%	7.14%	7.14%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.57	1.11	+0.46
SD	1.43	1.20	2.05
CV	0.91	1.08	—
Max	4	4	+4
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	10.71%	3.57%	7.14%	7.14%	—	35.71%
1	3.57%	7.14%	10.71%	10.71%	—	—	32.14%
2	7.14%	3.57%	—	—	3.57%	—	14.29%
3	—	—	10.71%	—	—	—	10.71%
4	—	3.57%	—	—	—	—	3.57%
5+	—	—	3.57%	—	—	—	3.57%
Total	17.86%	25.00%	28.57%	17.86%	10.71%	—	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.36	1.79	-0.43
SD	1.73	1.26	2.18
CV	1.27	0.70	—
Max	8	4	+6
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 28

↓ Scored \| Allowed →	0	1	2	3	4	5+	Total
0	7.14%	—	10.71%	14.29%	3.57%	—	35.71%
1	—	14.29%	3.57%	10.71%	—	—	28.57%
2	3.57%	14.29%	3.57%	3.57%	—	3.57%	28.57%
3	—	—	3.57%	—	—	—	3.57%
4	3.57%	—	—	—	—	—	3.57%
5+	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	14.29%	28.57%	21.43%	28.57%	3.57%	3.57%	100%

Summary Statistics

	Scored	Allowed	Difference
Mean	1.11	1.93	-0.82
SD	1.07	1.39	1.93
CV	0.96	0.72	—
Max	4	6	+4
Min	0	0	-4

Games Played: 28

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team	Elo	Points	Avg	Luck	Percentile	Min	5th	Q1	Median	Q3	95th	Max
Jeunesse Esch	1336	58	44.99	+13.01	100.0%	32	36	42	46	48	53	56
F91 Dudelange	1309	46	41.62	+4.38	80.0%	22	31	38	41	45	51	56
Etzella Ettelbruck	1174	44	33.16	+10.84	95.0%	21	23	29	33	37	44	48
Grevenmacher	1172	36	38.28	-2.28	37.0%	22	27	35	38	42	49	53
Union Luxembourg	1091	32	34.67	-2.67	34.0%	17	23	31	34	39	44	52
Wiltz 71	959	18	20.59	-2.59	34.0%	9	13	17	20	24	30	33
Swift Hesperange	940	25	31.39	-6.39	15.0%	13	23	28	31	35	42	45
Mondercange	935	18	24.40	-6.40	13.0%	9	15	20	24	29	33	35
Spora Luxembourg	930	36	27.55	+8.45	94.0%	9	16	23	28	32	37	41
Avenir Beggen	919	20	24.47	-4.47	24.0%	11	15	21	24	29	33	42
Rumelange	908	18	21.17	-3.17	30.0%	10	12	17	21	25	29	33
Victoria Rosport	885	24	28.91	-4.91	22.0%	15	17	25	29	34	38	43

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge: Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 7% * Slight Edge: 7% to 11.5% * Clear Edge: 11.5% to 16.5% * Strong Edge: 16.5% and up.
Elo Value: Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt: Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.

Home Edge

HomeDrawAway

+13.69%

Clear Edge

47.62%18.45%33.93%

Elo Value

Home Edge

146 Elo

0.007 goals per Elo point

047.87400

Scoring Tilt

Expected

+0.51 goals

Home-Tilted

-2+0.33+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness: Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 2 * Top-Heavy: 2 to 3 * Open: 3 to 4 * Wide Open: 4 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds: Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 6th * Longshot: 7th or lower.
Title Margin: Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.05 * Tight Race: 0.05 to 0.17 * Comfortable: 0.17 to 0.27 * Runaway: 0.27 and up.

Title-Race Openness

2.6

Top-Heavy

123410

Champion Preseason Odds

54%

Jeunesse Esch, 1st of 12

LongshotFavorite

Title Margin

Expected

0.55/gm

Runaway

00.220.8/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread: Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 4.65 * Some Luck: 4.65 to 6.97 * Lucky: 6.97 to 9.3 * Wild Swing: 9.3 and up.
Average Finish Error: Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 1.32 * Close: 1.32 to 1.98 * Off: 1.98 to 2.65 * Way Off: 2.65 and up.
Biggest Overachiever: The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever: The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Season Outliers: Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 12 * As Expected: 12 to 19.2 * Several Outliers: 19.2 to 26.4 * Many Outliers: 26.4 and up.

Luck Spread

Expected

6.65 points

Some Luck

05.8115

Average Finish Error

Expected

1.00

Pinpoint

01.654

Biggest Overachiever

Expected 95.83%

100.00%

Jeunesse Esch

50100

Biggest Underachiever

Expected 4.17%

13.00%

Mondercange

050

Season Outliers

Expected

1 of 12

Minimal Outliers

01.26

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index: How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.17 * Even: 0.17 to 0.19 * Top-Heavy: 0.19 to 0.21 * Lopsided: 0.21 and up.
Noll-Scully: Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.65 * Moderate Separation: 1.65 to 1.85 * Strong Separation: 1.85 to 2.05 * Wide Separation: 2.05 and up.
Interquartile Edge: Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 68% * Slight Edge: 68% to 72.5% * Clear Edge: 72.5% to 78% * Wide Edge: 78% and up.
Best vs. Worst: Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 89.5% * Clear Edge: 89.5% to 92% * Strong Edge: 92% to 95% * Dominant: 95% and up.
Close Games: Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 49% * Some Drama: 49% to 53% * Frequent: 53% to 56% * Very Frequent: 56% and up.
Blowouts: Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 23% * Occasional: 23% to 26% * Frequent: 26% to 28% * Very Frequent: 28% and up.

Gini Index

0.22

Lopsided

00.170.5

Noll-Scully

Elo SD: 167.17

2.04

Strong Separation

11.651.852.052.5

Interquartile Edge

83%

Wide Edge

50%68%78%100%

Best vs. Worst

Baseline 97%

94%

Strong Edge

50%100%

Close Games

Expected

51%

Some Drama

0%48%100%

Blowouts

Expected

25%

Occasional

0%28%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score: How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance: How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.35 * Slight Separation: 0.35 to 0.39 * Notable Separation: 0.39 to 0.44 * Lopsided: 0.44 and up.
Strangeness: How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability: How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.43 * Some Carryover: 0.43 to 0.62 * Strong Carryover: 0.62 to 0.73 * Near-Lock: 0.73 and up.
Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 21.5% * As Expected: 21.5% to 24% * Upset-Prone: 24% to 26.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 26.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate: Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 18% * As Expected: 18% to 20.5% * Shaky Favorites: 20.5% to 23.5% * Very Shaky: 23.5% and up.

Brier Score

Expected

0.60

Predictable

00.572

Matchup Imbalance

0.36

Slight Separation

00.350.5

Strangeness

Expected

1.42

Chaotic

01.002

Repeatability

0.37

Weak Carryover

00.430.621

Upset Rate

Expected

32%

Very Upset-Prone

0%26%50%

Clear Favorite Upset Rate

Expected

28%

Very Shaky

0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration: An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope: Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE): The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.13 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.13 to 0.2 * Above Noise: 0.2 to 0.27 * Well Above Noise: 0.27 and up.

Probability calibration

0.35

Well Calibrated

0.010.050.10.51

Calibration slope

Ideal

0.70

Overconfident

0.51.001.5

Calibration error (ECE)

Noise ceiling

0.090

Well Within Noise

00.1330.3

Elo Progression Through The Playoffs

How each team's Elo rating moved through the playoff games. Game 0 is the starting Elo just before the first game; each later point is the post-game Elo after that fixture. Steep upward moves are wins over higher-rated opponents; sharp drops are losses to lower-rated opponents.

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
Jeunesse Esch	54.00%	24.00%	15.00%	4.00%	2.00%	—	1.00%	—	—	—	—	—
F91 Dudelange	27.00%	32.00%	20.00%	11.00%	4.00%	2.00%	1.00%	2.00%	—	1.00%	—	—
Etzella Ettelbruck	3.00%	7.00%	12.00%	15.00%	15.00%	14.00%	14.00%	9.00%	4.00%	6.00%	1.00%	—
Grevenmacher	10.00%	22.00%	23.00%	19.00%	11.00%	6.00%	5.00%	1.00%	2.00%	1.00%	—	—
Spora Luxembourg	—	1.00%	1.00%	8.00%	14.00%	11.00%	14.00%	15.00%	12.00%	13.00%	5.00%	6.00%
Union Luxembourg	5.00%	10.00%	13.00%	21.00%	13.00%	19.00%	7.00%	3.00%	4.00%	3.00%	1.00%	1.00%
Swift Hesperange	—	—	11.00%	13.00%	11.00%	20.00%	16.00%	8.00%	10.00%	7.00%	3.00%	1.00%
Victoria Rosport	1.00%	4.00%	2.00%	7.00%	19.00%	7.00%	13.00%	16.00%	11.00%	8.00%	7.00%	5.00%
Avenir Beggen	—	—	3.00%	—	4.00%	6.00%	10.00%	15.00%	18.00%	13.00%	15.00%	16.00%
Rumelange	—	—	—	1.00%	1.00%	4.00%	3.00%	9.00%	16.00%	18.00%	26.00%	22.00%
Mondercange	—	—	—	1.00%	6.00%	9.00%	11.00%	15.00%	12.00%	14.00%	20.00%	12.00%
Wiltz 71	—	—	—	—	—	2.00%	5.00%	7.00%	11.00%	16.00%	22.00%	37.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team	Same level	Lost relegation playoff
Etzella Ettelbruck	100%	—
Jeunesse Esch	100%	—
F91 Dudelange	99.00%	1.00%
Grevenmacher	99.00%	1.00%
Union Luxembourg	99.00%	1.00%
Swift Hesperange	93.00%	7.00%
Victoria Rosport	92.00%	8.00%
Spora Luxembourg	91.00%	9.00%
Mondercange	75.00%	25.00%
Avenir Beggen	64.00%	36.00%
Rumelange	49.00%	51.00%
Wiltz 71	39.00%	61.00%

Actual Promotion/Relegation Outcomes

Across 100,000 simulations that fixed the regular-season standings and projected only the promotion/relegation playoff, each participating team's chance of going up versus staying at this level.

Team	Same level	Lost relegation playoff
Etzella Ettelbruck	100%	—
F91 Dudelange	100%	—
Grevenmacher	100%	—
Jeunesse Esch	100%	—
Spora Luxembourg	100%	—
Union Luxembourg	100%	—
Swift Hesperange	98.14%	1.86%
Victoria Rosport	97.10%	2.90%
Avenir Beggen	72.06%	27.94%
Rumelange	48.85%	51.15%
Mondercange	47.86%	52.14%
Wiltz 71	35.99%	64.01%

Filter by Team:

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
2003-08-09	F91 Dudelange	W 3-2	53.7	1027	1138	31.59%	19.48%	48.93%	-0.43	+15.9	3
2003-08-09	@ Avenir Beggen	L 2-3	53.7	1138	1027	48.93%	19.48%	31.59%	+0.43	-15.9	0
2003-08-10	Jeunesse Esch	L 1-2	47.2	1110	1137	43.17%	19.56%	37.27%	+0.14	-15.1	0
2003-08-10	@ Swift Hesperange	W 2-1	47.2	1137	1110	37.27%	19.56%	43.17%	-0.14	+15.1	3
2003-08-10	Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.9	974	1076	32.73%	19.51%	47.77%	-0.37	+1.2	1
2003-08-10	@ Wiltz 71	D 1-1	53.9	1076	974	47.77%	19.51%	32.73%	+0.37	-1.2	1
2003-08-10	Rumelange	W 1-0	34.3	1175	1009	65.33%	18.54%	16.13%	+1.46	+6.8	3
2003-08-10	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-1	34.3	1009	1175	16.13%	18.54%	65.33%	-1.46	-6.8	0
2003-08-10	Spora Luxembourg	L 1-3	52.6	1062	832	70.34%	17.86%	11.80%	+1.90	-41.0	0
2003-08-10	@ Mondercange	W 3-1	52.6	832	1062	11.80%	17.86%	70.34%	-1.90	+41.0	3
2003-08-10	Victoria Rosport	W 1-0	42.9	973	1047	36.48%	19.56%	43.96%	-0.18	+16.2	3
2003-08-10	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-1	42.9	1047	973	43.96%	19.56%	36.48%	+0.18	-16.2	0
2003-08-23	Swift Hesperange	W 2-0	38.0	1075	1095	44.16%	19.56%	36.28%	+0.19	+26.2	4
2003-08-23	@ Union Luxembourg	L 0-2	38.0	1095	1075	36.28%	19.56%	44.16%	-0.19	-26.2	0
2003-08-24	Avenir Beggen	W 3-1	48.8	873	1043	24.61%	19.23%	56.16%	-0.83	+33.0	6
2003-08-24	@ Spora Luxembourg	L 1-3	48.8	1043	873	56.16%	19.23%	24.61%	+0.83	-33.0	3
2003-08-24	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	54.1	1122	989	62.36%	18.82%	18.81%	+1.24	-3.7	1
2003-08-24	@ F91 Dudelange	D 1-1	54.1	989	1122	18.81%	18.82%	62.36%	-1.24	+3.7	4
2003-08-24	Mondercange	W 1-0	35.2	1152	1021	62.14%	18.84%	19.02%	+1.22	+8.0	6
2003-08-24	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	35.2	1021	1152	19.02%	18.84%	62.14%	-1.22	-7.9	0
2003-08-24	Rumelange	W 8-2	36.2	1031	1002	50.65%	19.44%	29.91%	+0.52	+42.3	3
2003-08-24	@ Victoria Rosport	L 2-8	36.2	1002	1031	29.91%	19.44%	50.65%	-0.52	-42.3	0
2003-08-24	Wiltz 71	W 3-1	35.6	1182	975	68.63%	18.12%	13.25%	+1.74	+9.2	6
2003-08-24	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-3	35.6	975	1182	13.25%	18.12%	68.63%	-1.74	-9.2	1
2003-08-30	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	37.7	1010	1160	26.83%	19.33%	53.83%	-0.70	-10.8	3
2003-08-30	@ Avenir Beggen	W 1-0	37.7	1160	1010	53.83%	19.33%	26.83%	+0.70	+10.8	9
2003-08-31	Grevenmacher	W 3-2	54.0	1073	1191	30.72%	19.46%	49.82%	-0.48	+16.2	6
2003-08-31	@ Victoria Rosport	L 2-3	54.0	1191	1073	49.82%	19.46%	30.72%	+0.48	-16.2	6
2003-08-31	Union Luxembourg	W 2-0	40.9	1013	1101	34.65%	19.54%	45.81%	-0.27	+31.7	3
2003-08-31	@ Mondercange	L 0-2	40.9	1101	1013	45.81%	19.54%	34.65%	+0.27	-31.7	4
2003-08-31	Wiltz 71	W 3-0	31.3	1069	966	59.31%	19.05%	21.64%	+1.03	+24.5	3
2003-08-31	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-3	31.3	966	1069	21.64%	19.05%	59.31%	-1.03	-24.5	1
2003-09-01	F91 Dudelange	L 0-1	37.4	960	1118	25.86%	19.29%	54.85%	-0.76	-10.4	0
2003-09-01	@ Rumelange	W 1-0	37.4	1118	960	54.85%	19.29%	25.86%	+0.76	+10.5	4
2003-09-01	Spora Luxembourg	L 3-6	51.9	993	906	57.55%	19.15%	23.29%	+0.92	-38.2	4
2003-09-01	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 6-3	51.9	906	993	23.29%	19.15%	57.55%	-0.92	+38.3	9
2003-09-13	Swift Hesperange	W 4-0	30.9	1175	1093	57.00%	19.18%	23.81%	+0.89	+34.8	9
2003-09-13	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-4	30.9	1093	1175	23.81%	19.18%	57.00%	-0.89	-34.8	3
2003-09-13	Victoria Rosport	W 2-0	35.7	1129	1089	52.04%	19.40%	28.56%	+0.60	+21.4	7
2003-09-13	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	35.7	1089	1129	28.56%	19.40%	52.04%	-0.60	-21.4	6
2003-09-14	Avenir Beggen	L 0-1	46.3	1069	999	55.69%	19.25%	25.06%	+0.81	-20.0	4
2003-09-14	@ Union Luxembourg	W 1-0	46.3	999	1069	25.06%	19.25%	55.69%	-0.81	+20.0	6
2003-09-14	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-3	52.4	1171	954	69.36%	18.01%	12.62%	+1.81	-40.5	9
2003-09-14	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 3-1	52.4	954	1171	12.62%	18.01%	69.36%	-1.81	+40.5	7
2003-09-14	Mondercange	L 1-2	43.9	941	1045	32.54%	19.50%	47.96%	-0.38	-12.0	1
2003-09-14	@ Wiltz 71	W 2-1	43.9	1045	941	47.96%	19.50%	32.54%	+0.38	+12.0	6
2003-09-14	Rumelange	W 2-0	37.4	944	949	46.22%	19.53%	34.25%	+0.29	+25.0	12
2003-09-14	@ Spora Luxembourg	L 0-2	37.4	949	944	34.25%	19.53%	46.22%	-0.29	-25.0	0
2003-09-17	Grevenmacher	L 1-2	45.9	1150	1209	38.60%	19.57%	41.83%	-0.08	-13.8	7
2003-09-17	@ F91 Dudelange	W 2-1	45.9	1209	1150	41.83%	19.57%	38.60%	+0.08	+13.8	12
2003-09-17	Jeunesse Esch	L 1-4	35.9	924	1130	20.93%	19.00%	60.07%	-1.08	-20.0	0
2003-09-17	@ Rumelange	W 4-1	35.9	1130	924	60.07%	19.00%	20.93%	+1.08	+20.0	12
2003-09-17	Union Luxembourg	D 0-0	50.3	995	1049	39.28%	19.57%	41.15%	-0.04	+0.2	8
2003-09-17	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 0-0	50.3	1049	995	41.15%	19.57%	39.28%	+0.04	-0.2	5
2003-09-17	Spora Luxembourg	L 2-4	53.8	1068	969	58.84%	19.08%	22.08%	+1.00	-30.8	6
2003-09-17	@ Victoria Rosport	W 4-2	53.8	969	1068	22.08%	19.08%	58.84%	-1.00	+30.8	15
2003-09-17	Swift Hesperange	L 1-3	46.1	1057	1058	46.72%	19.52%	33.76%	+0.32	-27.9	6
2003-09-17	@ Mondercange	W 3-1	46.1	1058	1057	33.76%	19.52%	46.72%	-0.32	+27.9	6
2003-09-17	Wiltz 71	L 0-2	44.3	1019	929	57.92%	19.13%	22.94%	+0.94	-39.2	6
2003-09-17	@ Avenir Beggen	W 2-0	44.3	929	1019	22.94%	19.13%	57.92%	-0.94	+39.2	4
2003-09-21	Avenir Beggen	W 5-2	39.4	1086	980	59.66%	19.03%	21.31%	+1.05	+17.6	9
2003-09-21	@ Swift Hesperange	L 2-5	39.4	980	1086	21.31%	19.03%	59.66%	-1.05	-17.6	6
2003-09-21	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	53.9	968	995	43.26%	19.56%	37.18%	+0.15	-0.5	5
2003-09-21	@ Wiltz 71	D 1-1	53.9	995	968	37.18%	19.56%	43.26%	-0.15	+0.5	9
2003-09-21	F91 Dudelange	L 2-3	47.5	1000	1136	28.44%	19.39%	52.17%	-0.61	-10.1	15
2003-09-21	@ Spora Luxembourg	W 3-2	47.5	1136	1000	52.17%	19.39%	28.44%	+0.61	+10.1	10
2003-09-21	Mondercange	W 5-0	27.4	1223	1029	67.68%	18.25%	14.07%	+1.66	+26.5	15
2003-09-21	@ Grevenmacher	L 0-5	27.4	1029	1223	14.07%	18.25%	67.68%	-1.66	-26.5	6
2003-09-21	Rumelange	W 4-1	34.9	1049	904	63.44%	18.73%	17.83%	+1.32	+17.3	8
2003-09-21	@ Union Luxembourg	L 1-4	34.9	904	1049	17.83%	18.73%	63.44%	-1.32	-17.3	0
2003-09-21	Victoria Rosport	W 3-1	38.1	1150	1037	60.41%	18.97%	20.62%	+1.10	+14.0	15
2003-09-21	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-3	38.1	1037	1150	20.62%	18.97%	60.41%	-1.10	-14.0	6
2003-09-27	Mondercange	W 2-0	38.8	962	1002	41.33%	19.57%	39.10%	+0.05	+27.8	9
2003-09-27	@ Avenir Beggen	L 0-2	38.8	1002	962	39.10%	19.57%	41.33%	-0.05	-27.8	6
2003-09-27	Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	42.0	1023	1066	40.85%	19.57%	39.57%	+0.03	-15.3	6
2003-09-27	@ Victoria Rosport	W 1-0	42.0	1066	1023	39.57%	19.57%	40.85%	-0.03	+15.3	11
2003-09-28	Grevenmacher	W 3-1	51.3	990	1250	16.27%	18.55%	65.17%	-1.45	+38.1	18
2003-09-28	@ Spora Luxembourg	L 1-3	51.3	1250	990	65.17%	18.55%	16.27%	+1.45	-38.1	15
2003-09-28	Jeunesse Esch	L 1-2	47.6	1147	1164	44.48%	19.55%	35.96%	+0.21	-15.5	10
2003-09-28	@ F91 Dudelange	W 2-1	47.6	1164	1147	35.96%	19.55%	44.48%	-0.21	+15.5	18
2003-09-28	Swift Hesperange	W 3-1	46.6	995	1104	31.92%	19.49%	48.59%	-0.41	+28.9	12
2003-09-28	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-3	46.6	1104	995	48.59%	19.49%	31.92%	+0.41	-28.9	9
2003-09-28	Wiltz 71	W 3-2	52.4	887	968	35.57%	19.55%	44.89%	-0.23	+14.8	3
2003-09-28	@ Rumelange	L 2-3	52.4	968	887	44.89%	19.55%	35.57%	+0.23	-14.8	5
2003-10-01	Avenir Beggen	D 1-1	54.4	1212	990	69.72%	17.96%	12.32%	+1.84	-5.1	16
2003-10-01	@ Grevenmacher	D 1-1	54.4	990	1212	12.32%	17.96%	69.72%	-1.84	+5.1	10
2003-10-01	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-4	41.8	975	1024	39.95%	19.58%	40.47%	-0.01	-34.7	6
2003-10-01	@ Mondercange	W 4-1	41.8	1024	975	40.47%	19.58%	39.95%	+0.01	+34.7	15
2003-10-01	F91 Dudelange	D 1-1	53.9	1082	1131	39.98%	19.58%	40.44%	-0.01	+0.0	12
2003-10-01	@ Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.9	1131	1082	40.44%	19.58%	39.98%	+0.01	-0.0	11
2003-10-01	Rumelange	D 1-1	54.2	1075	902	65.95%	18.47%	15.58%	+1.51	-4.4	10
2003-10-01	@ Swift Hesperange	D 1-1	54.2	902	1075	15.58%	18.47%	65.95%	-1.51	+4.4	4
2003-10-01	Spora Luxembourg	W 5-0	28.5	1180	1028	64.09%	18.66%	17.25%	+1.37	+32.0	21
2003-10-01	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-5	28.5	1028	1180	17.25%	18.66%	64.09%	-1.37	-32.0	18
2003-10-01	Victoria Rosport	D 0-0	50.3	953	1008	39.28%	19.57%	41.15%	-0.04	+0.2	6
2003-10-01	@ Wiltz 71	D 0-0	50.3	1008	953	41.15%	19.57%	39.28%	+0.04	-0.2	7
2003-10-05	Avenir Beggen	D 1-1	54.0	1059	995	54.96%	19.28%	25.76%	+0.76	-2.4	16
2003-10-05	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	54.0	995	1059	25.76%	19.28%	54.96%	-0.76	+2.4	11
2003-10-05	Grevenmacher	W 3-0	35.1	1212	1206	47.61%	19.51%	32.88%	+0.36	+35.1	24
2003-10-05	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-3	35.1	1206	1212	32.88%	19.51%	47.61%	-0.36	-35.1	16
2003-10-05	Mondercange	D 2-2	58.8	906	940	42.23%	19.57%	38.20%	+0.10	-0.2	5
2003-10-05	@ Rumelange	D 2-2	58.8	940	906	38.20%	19.57%	42.23%	-0.10	+0.2	7
2003-10-05	Union Luxembourg	W 2-1	47.8	996	1082	34.92%	19.54%	45.54%	-0.26	+15.8	21
2003-10-05	@ Spora Luxembourg	L 1-2	47.8	1082	996	45.54%	19.54%	34.92%	+0.26	-15.8	12
2003-10-05	Swift Hesperange	W 2-1	46.9	1007	1071	38.05%	19.57%	42.38%	-0.10	+14.8	10
2003-10-05	@ Victoria Rosport	L 1-2	46.9	1071	1007	42.38%	19.57%	38.05%	+0.10	-14.9	10
2003-10-05	Wiltz 71	W 3-0	29.2	1131	953	66.34%	18.42%	15.24%	+1.54	+17.7	14
2003-10-05	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-3	29.2	953	1131	15.24%	18.42%	66.34%	-1.54	-17.7	6
2003-10-17	Rumelange	D 2-2	59.0	998	906	58.12%	19.12%	22.76%	+0.96	-2.2	12
2003-10-17	@ Avenir Beggen	D 2-2	59.0	906	998	22.76%	19.12%	58.12%	-0.96	+2.2	6
2003-10-19	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 2-2	59.1	1171	1057	60.55%	18.96%	20.49%	+1.11	-2.5	17
2003-10-19	@ Grevenmacher	D 2-2	59.1	1057	1171	20.49%	18.96%	60.55%	-1.11	+2.5	17
2003-10-19	F91 Dudelange	L 1-3	42.2	1056	1149	33.92%	19.53%	46.55%	-0.31	-21.5	10
2003-10-19	@ Swift Hesperange	W 3-1	42.2	1149	1056	46.55%	19.53%	33.92%	+0.31	+21.5	17
2003-10-19	Victoria Rosport	L 2-3	49.6	940	1022	35.41%	19.55%	45.04%	-0.23	-12.2	7
2003-10-19	@ Mondercange	W 3-2	49.6	1022	940	45.04%	19.55%	35.41%	+0.23	+12.2	13
2003-10-22	Avenir Beggen	D 1-1	54.0	1034	995	51.97%	19.40%	28.63%	+0.59	-1.9	14
2003-10-22	@ Victoria Rosport	D 1-1	54.0	995	1034	28.63%	19.40%	51.97%	-0.59	+1.9	13
2003-10-22	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 3-3	63.1	908	1059	26.73%	19.33%	53.94%	-0.71	+1.4	7
2003-10-22	@ Rumelange	D 3-3	63.1	1059	908	53.94%	19.33%	26.73%	+0.71	-1.4	18
2003-10-22	Grevenmacher	W 3-0	39.4	1066	1169	32.62%	19.50%	47.88%	-0.38	+47.9	15
2003-10-22	@ Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	39.4	1169	1066	47.88%	19.50%	32.62%	+0.38	-47.8	17
2003-10-22	Mondercange	W 2-0	29.9	1170	928	71.16%	17.72%	11.12%	+1.99	+9.0	20
2003-10-22	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	29.9	928	1170	11.12%	17.72%	71.16%	-1.99	-9.0	7
2003-10-22	Swift Hesperange	L 1-2	47.3	1012	1034	43.82%	19.56%	36.62%	+0.17	-15.3	21
2003-10-22	@ Spora Luxembourg	W 2-1	47.3	1034	1012	36.62%	19.56%	43.82%	-0.17	+15.3	13
2003-10-22	Wiltz 71	W 3-0	26.5	1247	936	75.30%	16.82%	7.88%	+2.46	+9.3	27
2003-10-22	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-3	26.5	936	1247	7.88%	16.82%	75.30%	-2.46	-9.3	6
2003-10-26	F91 Dudelange	D 1-1	54.0	1058	1179	30.25%	19.45%	50.30%	-0.50	+1.6	19
2003-10-26	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 1-1	54.0	1179	1058	50.30%	19.45%	30.25%	+0.50	-1.6	21
2003-10-26	Grevenmacher	L 0-2	33.6	926	1121	22.03%	19.08%	58.90%	-1.00	-17.1	6
2003-10-26	@ Wiltz 71	W 2-0	33.6	1121	926	58.90%	19.08%	22.03%	+1.00	+17.1	20
2003-10-26	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-4	26.6	919	1256	11.17%	17.73%	71.11%	-1.98	-17.2	7
2003-10-26	@ Mondercange	W 4-0	26.6	1256	919	71.11%	17.73%	11.17%	+1.98	+17.2	30
2003-10-26	Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	36.4	1049	1114	37.88%	19.57%	42.55%	-0.11	-39.4	13
2003-10-26	@ Swift Hesperange	W 3-0	36.4	1114	1049	42.55%	19.57%	37.88%	+0.11	+39.4	18
2003-10-26	Spora Luxembourg	L 1-2	48.2	997	996	47.03%	19.52%	33.45%	+0.33	-16.2	13
2003-10-26	@ Avenir Beggen	W 2-1	48.2	996	997	33.45%	19.52%	47.03%	-0.33	+16.2	24
2003-10-26	Victoria Rosport	W 3-0	40.1	910	1033	30.07%	19.44%	50.48%	-0.51	+50.1	10
2003-10-26	@ Rumelange	L 0-3	40.1	1033	910	50.48%	19.44%	30.07%	+0.51	-50.1	14
2003-10-31	Avenir Beggen	W 8-0	26.7	1273	981	74.25%	17.08%	8.67%	+2.33	+25.7	33
2003-10-31	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-8	26.7	981	1273	8.67%	17.08%	74.25%	-2.33	-25.7	13
2003-10-31	Mondercange	D 0-0	50.9	1153	902	71.76%	17.61%	10.63%	+2.05	-6.1	19
2003-10-31	@ Union Luxembourg	D 0-0	50.9	902	1153	10.63%	17.61%	71.76%	-2.05	+6.1	8
2003-11-02	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 4-3	54.4	1013	1059	40.38%	19.58%	40.04%	+0.01	+13.1	27
2003-11-02	@ Spora Luxembourg	L 3-4	54.4	1059	1013	40.04%	19.58%	40.38%	-0.01	-13.1	19
2003-11-02	Rumelange	W 5-0	26.8	1178	960	69.47%	18.00%	12.53%	+1.82	+23.7	24
2003-11-02	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-5	26.8	960	1178	12.53%	18.00%	69.47%	-1.82	-23.7	10
2003-11-02	Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	37.0	909	1010	32.91%	19.51%	47.58%	-0.36	-24.2	6
2003-11-02	@ Wiltz 71	W 2-0	37.0	1010	909	47.58%	19.51%	32.91%	+0.36	+24.2	16
2003-11-02	Victoria Rosport	L 1-4	48.9	1138	982	64.45%	18.63%	16.92%	+1.39	-53.2	20
2003-11-02	@ Grevenmacher	W 4-1	48.9	982	1138	16.92%	18.63%	64.45%	-1.39	+53.2	17
2003-11-04	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-4	32.0	1147	1299	26.61%	19.32%	54.07%	-0.71	-38.3	19
2003-11-04	@ Union Luxembourg	W 4-0	32.0	1299	1147	54.07%	19.32%	26.61%	+0.71	+38.3	36
2003-11-09	F91 Dudelange	L 1-2	41.6	1036	1201	25.07%	19.25%	55.68%	-0.81	-9.6	17
2003-11-09	@ Victoria Rosport	W 2-1	41.6	1201	1036	55.68%	19.25%	25.07%	+0.81	+9.6	27
2003-11-09	Grevenmacher	L 1-2	46.1	1034	1085	39.81%	19.58%	40.62%	-0.02	-14.1	16
2003-11-09	@ Swift Hesperange	W 2-1	46.1	1085	1034	40.62%	19.58%	39.81%	+0.02	+14.1	23
2003-11-09	Jeunesse Esch	W 3-0	45.1	1046	1337	13.99%	18.24%	67.77%	-1.66	+66.3	22
2003-11-09	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-3	45.1	1337	1046	67.77%	18.24%	13.99%	+1.66	-66.3	36
2003-11-09	Union Luxembourg	L 0-1	37.6	955	1109	26.46%	19.32%	54.23%	-0.72	-10.7	13
2003-11-09	@ Avenir Beggen	W 1-0	37.6	1109	955	54.23%	19.32%	26.46%	+0.72	+10.7	22
2003-11-09	Spora Luxembourg	L 1-5	38.3	936	1026	34.37%	19.53%	46.09%	-0.29	-39.6	10
2003-11-09	@ Rumelange	W 5-1	38.3	1026	936	46.09%	19.53%	34.37%	+0.29	+39.6	30
2003-11-09	Wiltz 71	W 3-0	34.1	908	885	49.91%	19.46%	30.63%	+0.48	+33.0	11
2003-11-09	@ Mondercange	L 0-3	34.1	885	908	30.63%	19.46%	49.91%	-0.48	-33.1	6
2003-11-15	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-1	44.1	1119	1113	47.82%	19.50%	32.67%	+0.37	-17.5	22
2003-11-15	@ Union Luxembourg	W 1-0	44.1	1113	1119	32.67%	19.50%	47.82%	-0.37	+17.5	25
2003-11-15	F91 Dudelange	W 2-1	48.9	1099	1211	31.47%	19.48%	49.05%	-0.44	+16.8	26
2003-11-15	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-2	48.9	1211	1099	49.05%	19.48%	31.47%	+0.44	-16.8	27
2003-11-15	Rumelange	W 2-1	34.8	1271	896	78.38%	15.90%	5.72%	+2.89	+2.3	39
2003-11-15	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-2	34.8	896	1271	5.72%	15.90%	78.38%	-2.89	-2.3	10
2003-11-15	Victoria Rosport	W 2-1	42.7	1065	1026	52.01%	19.40%	28.60%	+0.60	+10.7	33
2003-11-15	@ Spora Luxembourg	L 1-2	42.7	1026	1065	28.60%	19.40%	52.01%	-0.60	-10.7	17
2003-11-16	Avenir Beggen	W 2-1	48.1	852	945	33.98%	19.53%	46.50%	-0.31	+16.1	9
2003-11-16	@ Wiltz 71	L 1-2	48.1	945	852	46.50%	19.53%	33.98%	+0.31	-16.1	13
2003-11-16	Mondercange	W 1-0	36.8	1020	941	56.73%	19.20%	24.07%	+0.87	+9.8	19
2003-11-16	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-1	36.8	941	1020	24.07%	19.20%	56.73%	-0.87	-9.8	11
2003-11-23	Grevenmacher	W 2-1	51.4	931	1116	23.04%	19.14%	57.82%	-0.94	+19.6	14
2003-11-23	@ Mondercange	L 1-2	51.4	1116	931	57.82%	19.14%	23.04%	+0.94	-19.6	26
2003-11-23	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	34.4	1015	1273	16.41%	18.57%	65.02%	-1.44	-6.9	17
2003-11-23	@ Victoria Rosport	W 1-0	34.4	1273	1015	65.02%	18.57%	16.41%	+1.44	+6.9	42
2003-11-23	Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	54.1	894	1102	20.75%	18.98%	60.27%	-1.09	+3.4	11
2003-11-23	@ Rumelange	D 1-1	54.1	1102	894	60.27%	18.98%	20.75%	+1.09	-3.4	23
2003-11-23	Spora Luxembourg	W 2-0	33.0	1194	1076	60.87%	18.94%	20.19%	+1.13	+15.8	30
2003-11-23	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-2	33.0	1076	1194	20.19%	18.94%	60.87%	-1.13	-15.8	33
2003-11-23	Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	36.9	929	1030	32.86%	19.51%	47.63%	-0.37	-24.1	13
2003-11-23	@ Avenir Beggen	W 2-0	36.9	1030	929	47.63%	19.51%	32.86%	+0.37	+24.1	22
2003-11-24	Wiltz 71	W 6-2	32.8	1130	868	72.44%	17.47%	10.09%	+2.12	+11.0	28
2003-11-24	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 2-6	32.8	868	1130	10.09%	17.47%	72.44%	-2.12	-11.0	9
2003-11-29	Avenir Beggen	L 0-1	45.5	951	905	52.84%	19.37%	27.79%	+0.64	-19.1	14
2003-11-29	@ Mondercange	W 1-0	45.5	905	951	27.79%	19.37%	52.84%	-0.64	+19.1	16
2003-11-30	F91 Dudelange	D 1-1	54.4	1280	1210	55.72%	19.25%	25.03%	+0.81	-2.6	43
2003-11-30	@ Jeunesse Esch	D 1-1	54.4	1210	1280	25.03%	19.25%	55.72%	-0.81	+2.5	31
2003-11-30	Rumelange	W 2-1	45.9	857	897	41.29%	19.57%	39.14%	+0.05	+13.9	12
2003-11-30	@ Wiltz 71	L 1-2	45.9	897	857	39.14%	19.57%	41.29%	-0.05	-13.9	11
2003-11-30	Spora Luxembourg	W 8-1	34.6	1096	1060	51.59%	19.41%	29.00%	+0.57	+57.5	29
2003-11-30	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-8	34.6	1060	1096	29.00%	19.41%	51.59%	-0.57	-57.5	33
2003-11-30	Victoria Rosport	W 4-0	30.5	1099	1008	57.95%	19.13%	22.92%	+0.94	+33.6	26
2003-11-30	@ Union Luxembourg	L 0-4	30.5	1008	1099	22.92%	19.13%	57.95%	-0.94	-33.6	17
2003-12-03	Spora Luxembourg	W 2-1	49.6	871	1003	28.99%	19.41%	51.60%	-0.57	+17.6	15
2003-12-03	@ Wiltz 71	L 1-2	49.6	1003	871	51.60%	19.41%	28.99%	+0.57	-17.6	33
2003-12-05	Mondercange	W 8-2	30.8	1141	932	68.84%	18.09%	13.07%	+1.76	+20.0	31
2003-12-05	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 2-8	30.8	932	1141	13.07%	18.09%	68.84%	-1.76	-20.0	14
2003-12-07	Grevenmacher	W 1-0	48.2	924	1154	18.72%	18.81%	62.47%	-1.25	+22.3	19
2003-12-07	@ Avenir Beggen	L 0-1	48.2	1154	924	62.47%	18.81%	18.72%	+1.25	-22.4	29
2003-12-07	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	30.9	985	1278	13.90%	18.23%	67.87%	-1.67	-11.2	33
2003-12-07	@ Spora Luxembourg	W 2-0	30.9	1278	985	67.87%	18.23%	13.90%	+1.67	+11.2	46
2003-12-07	Union Luxembourg	W 1-0	36.9	1212	1132	56.86%	19.19%	23.95%	+0.88	+9.8	34
2003-12-07	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-1	36.9	1132	1212	23.95%	19.19%	56.86%	-0.88	-9.8	26
2003-12-07	Swift Hesperange	W 3-1	48.8	884	1054	24.54%	19.22%	56.23%	-0.84	+33.0	14
2003-12-07	@ Rumelange	L 1-3	48.8	1054	884	56.23%	19.22%	24.54%	+0.84	-33.0	22
2003-12-07	Wiltz 71	W 2-0	34.0	975	889	57.51%	19.16%	23.33%	+0.92	+18.0	20
2003-12-07	@ Victoria Rosport	L 0-2	34.0	889	975	23.33%	19.16%	57.51%	-0.92	-18.0	15
2003-12-11	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-2	35.5	1021	1161	28.01%	19.38%	52.61%	-0.63	-21.1	22
2003-12-11	@ Swift Hesperange	W 2-0	35.5	1161	1021	52.61%	19.38%	28.01%	+0.63	+21.1	34
2004-03-14	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-3	30.2	946	1182	18.20%	18.76%	63.04%	-1.29	-20.9	19
2004-03-14	@ Avenir Beggen	W 3-0	30.2	1182	946	63.04%	18.76%	18.20%	+1.29	+20.9	37
2004-03-14	F91 Dudelange	L 1-3	34.6	871	1222	10.39%	17.55%	72.06%	-2.08	-7.3	15
2004-03-14	@ Wiltz 71	W 3-1	34.6	1222	871	72.06%	17.55%	10.39%	+2.08	+7.3	37
2004-03-14	Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	35.1	1131	1289	25.99%	19.29%	54.72%	-0.75	-19.8	29
2004-03-14	@ Grevenmacher	W 2-0	35.1	1289	1131	54.72%	19.29%	25.99%	+0.75	+19.8	49
2004-03-14	Rumelange	D 2-2	58.8	912	917	46.23%	19.53%	34.24%	+0.29	-0.7	15
2004-03-14	@ Mondercange	D 2-2	58.8	917	912	34.24%	19.53%	46.23%	-0.29	+0.7	15
2004-03-14	Spora Luxembourg	W 3-1	37.0	1122	974	63.79%	18.69%	17.52%	+1.34	+12.0	29
2004-03-14	@ Union Luxembourg	L 1-3	37.0	974	1122	17.52%	18.69%	63.79%	-1.34	-12.0	33
2004-03-14	Victoria Rosport	L 0-1	44.0	1000	993	47.86%	19.50%	32.63%	+0.38	-17.5	22
2004-03-14	@ Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	44.0	993	1000	32.63%	19.50%	47.86%	-0.38	+17.5	23
2004-03-21	Avenir Beggen	W 1-0	40.1	917	925	45.84%	19.54%	34.63%	+0.27	+13.4	18
2004-03-21	@ Rumelange	L 0-1	40.1	925	917	34.63%	19.54%	45.84%	-0.27	-13.4	19
2004-03-21	Grevenmacher	D 2-2	59.1	1203	1112	58.08%	19.12%	22.79%	+0.95	-2.2	38
2004-03-21	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	D 2-2	59.1	1112	1203	22.79%	19.12%	58.08%	-0.95	+2.2	30
2004-03-21	Mondercange	L 1-3	49.6	1010	911	58.94%	19.07%	21.98%	+1.01	-34.5	23
2004-03-21	@ Victoria Rosport	W 3-1	49.6	911	1010	21.98%	19.07%	58.94%	-1.01	+34.5	18
2004-03-21	Union Luxembourg	W 1-0	34.3	1309	1134	66.05%	18.46%	15.50%	+1.52	+6.6	52
2004-03-21	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-1	34.3	1134	1309	15.50%	18.46%	66.05%	-1.52	-6.6	29
2004-03-21	Swift Hesperange	W 4-0	26.5	1230	982	71.49%	17.66%	10.86%	+2.02	+16.7	40
2004-03-21	@ F91 Dudelange	L 0-4	26.5	982	1230	10.86%	17.66%	71.49%	-2.02	-16.7	22
2004-03-21	Wiltz 71	L 1-2	51.6	962	863	58.87%	19.08%	22.06%	+1.00	-19.9	33
2004-03-21	@ Spora Luxembourg	W 2-1	51.6	863	962	22.06%	19.08%	58.87%	-1.00	+19.9	18
2004-03-25	Rumelange	W 3-0	27.2	1201	931	72.95%	17.37%	9.68%	+2.18	+11.4	41
2004-03-25	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-3	27.2	931	1201	9.68%	17.37%	72.95%	-2.18	-11.4	18
2004-03-27	F91 Dudelange	L 0-4	27.4	945	1246	13.34%	18.14%	68.52%	-1.73	-20.4	18
2004-03-27	@ Mondercange	W 4-0	27.4	1246	945	68.52%	18.14%	13.34%	+1.73	+20.4	43
2004-03-27	Jeunesse Esch	L 1-3	33.2	883	1315	6.94%	16.47%	76.59%	-2.63	-4.9	18
2004-03-27	@ Wiltz 71	W 3-1	33.2	1315	883	76.59%	16.47%	6.94%	+2.63	+4.9	55
2004-03-27	Union Luxembourg	W 4-2	47.0	1114	1128	44.99%	19.55%	35.47%	+0.23	+19.9	33
2004-03-27	@ Grevenmacher	L 2-4	47.0	1128	1114	35.47%	19.55%	44.99%	-0.23	-19.9	29
2004-03-27	Spora Luxembourg	W 3-2	48.1	966	942	50.02%	19.45%	30.52%	+0.49	+10.8	25
2004-03-27	@ Swift Hesperange	L 2-3	48.1	942	966	30.52%	19.45%	50.02%	-0.49	-10.8	33
2004-03-27	Victoria Rosport	D 1-1	53.9	912	976	37.92%	19.57%	42.51%	-0.11	+0.4	20
2004-03-27	@ Avenir Beggen	D 1-1	53.9	976	912	42.51%	19.57%	37.92%	+0.11	-0.4	24
2004-04-04	Avenir Beggen	W 8-1	26.9	1267	912	77.47%	16.20%	6.33%	+2.75	+13.5	46
2004-04-04	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-8	26.9	912	1267	6.33%	16.20%	77.47%	-2.75	-13.5	20
2004-04-04	Etzella Ettelbruck	L 1-2	39.4	975	1212	18.13%	18.76%	63.11%	-1.29	-7.2	24
2004-04-04	@ Victoria Rosport	W 2-1	39.4	1212	975	63.11%	18.76%	18.13%	+1.29	+7.2	44
2004-04-04	Grevenmacher	L 0-4	29.6	919	1134	20.12%	18.93%	60.95%	-1.14	-29.9	18
2004-04-04	@ Rumelange	W 4-0	29.6	1134	919	60.95%	18.93%	20.12%	+1.14	+29.9	36
2004-04-04	Mondercange	W 4-1	39.6	931	925	47.75%	19.51%	32.74%	+0.37	+29.5	36
2004-04-04	@ Spora Luxembourg	L 1-4	39.6	925	931	32.74%	19.51%	47.75%	-0.37	-29.5	18
2004-04-04	Swift Hesperange	W 3-0	26.1	1320	977	76.95%	16.36%	6.69%	+2.68	+7.9	58
2004-04-04	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-3	26.1	977	1320	6.69%	16.36%	76.95%	-2.68	-7.9	25
2004-04-04	Wiltz 71	W 4-0	26.8	1108	878	70.30%	17.86%	11.83%	+1.90	+18.2	32
2004-04-04	@ Union Luxembourg	L 0-4	26.8	878	1108	11.83%	17.86%	70.30%	-1.90	-18.2	18

Second Phase Game Log

Every second-phase (championship / middle / relegation round) game from each team's perspective, filtered by the team selected at the top of the tab; the table scrolls within its frame. Sort any column by clicking its header. @ before an opponent name indicates an away game. The final column is running points within the second phase only.

Date	Opponent	Score	Excitement	Pre Elo	Opp Elo	Win %	Tie %	Loss %	Proj. Margin	Elo Δ	Points
2004-04-10	Avenir Beggen	D 1-1	53.9	896	899	46.48%	19.53%	33.99%	+0.31	-1.0	1
2004-04-10	@ Mondercange	D 1-1	53.9	899	896	33.99%	19.53%	46.48%	-0.31	+1.0	1
2004-04-10	F91 Dudelange	W 2-0	40.2	1219	1280	38.37%	19.57%	42.06%	-0.09	+29.5	3
2004-04-10	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	L 0-2	40.2	1280	1219	42.06%	19.57%	38.37%	+0.09	-29.5	0
2004-04-10	Grevenmacher	W 2-0	32.1	1328	1164	65.20%	18.55%	16.25%	+1.45	+13.0	3
2004-04-10	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 0-2	32.1	1164	1328	16.25%	18.55%	65.20%	-1.45	-13.0	0
2004-04-10	Swift Hesperange	D 1-1	53.9	961	969	45.83%	19.54%	34.63%	+0.27	-0.9	1
2004-04-10	@ Spora Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.9	969	961	34.63%	19.54%	45.83%	-0.27	+0.9	1
2004-04-10	Victoria Rosport	L 0-2	37.8	889	968	35.85%	19.55%	44.60%	-0.21	-25.9	0
2004-04-10	@ Rumelange	W 2-0	37.8	968	889	44.60%	19.55%	35.85%	+0.21	+25.9	3
2004-04-10	Wiltz 71	D 1-1	54.5	1126	860	72.69%	17.42%	9.88%	+2.15	-5.6	1
2004-04-10	@ Union Luxembourg	D 1-1	54.5	860	1126	9.88%	17.42%	72.69%	-2.15	+5.6	1
2004-04-18	Avenir Beggen	W 2-0	34.5	970	900	55.68%	19.25%	25.07%	+0.81	+19.2	4
2004-04-18	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	34.5	900	970	25.07%	19.25%	55.68%	-0.81	-19.2	1
2004-04-18	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 4-1	37.4	1341	1249	58.15%	19.12%	22.73%	+0.96	+21.5	6
2004-04-18	@ Jeunesse Esch	L 1-4	37.4	1249	1341	22.73%	19.12%	58.15%	-0.96	-21.5	3
2004-04-18	Grevenmacher	W 2-1	40.8	1251	1151	59.01%	19.07%	21.93%	+1.01	+8.5	3
2004-04-18	@ F91 Dudelange	L 1-2	40.8	1151	1251	21.93%	19.07%	59.01%	-1.01	-8.5	0
2004-04-18	Rumelange	W 4-1	32.3	1121	863	72.14%	17.53%	10.32%	+2.09	+10.3	4
2004-04-18	@ Union Luxembourg	L 1-4	32.3	863	1121	10.32%	17.53%	72.14%	-2.09	-10.3	0
2004-04-18	Spora Luxembourg	W 3-0	37.8	895	960	37.72%	19.57%	42.71%	-0.12	+43.4	4
2004-04-18	@ Mondercange	L 0-3	37.8	960	895	42.71%	19.57%	37.72%	+0.12	-43.4	1
2004-04-18	Wiltz 71	L 0-4	42.1	994	866	61.90%	18.86%	19.24%	+1.21	-79.3	3
2004-04-18	@ Victoria Rosport	W 4-0	42.1	866	994	19.24%	18.86%	61.90%	-1.21	+79.3	4
2004-04-23	Mondercange	W 2-0	35.2	989	938	53.42%	19.35%	27.24%	+0.68	+20.6	7
2004-04-23	@ Swift Hesperange	L 0-2	35.2	938	989	27.24%	19.35%	53.42%	-0.68	-20.6	4
2004-04-24	Etzella Ettelbruck	W 2-1	47.9	1142	1227	34.99%	19.54%	45.47%	-0.26	+15.8	3
2004-04-24	@ Grevenmacher	L 1-2	47.9	1227	1142	45.47%	19.54%	34.99%	+0.26	-15.8	3
2004-04-24	Jeunesse Esch	W 3-2	54.4	1259	1362	32.59%	19.50%	47.91%	-0.38	+15.6	6
2004-04-24	@ F91 Dudelange	L 2-3	54.4	1362	1259	47.91%	19.50%	32.59%	+0.38	-15.6	6
2004-04-24	Union Luxembourg	W 3-2	57.1	915	1131	19.98%	18.92%	61.09%	-1.15	+19.6	6
2004-04-24	@ Victoria Rosport	L 2-3	57.1	1131	915	61.09%	18.92%	19.98%	+1.15	-19.6	4
2004-04-24	Spora Luxembourg	L 1-2	46.7	880	916	41.90%	19.57%	38.52%	+0.08	-14.7	1
2004-04-24	@ Avenir Beggen	W 2-1	46.7	916	880	38.52%	19.57%	41.90%	-0.08	+14.7	4
2004-04-25	Rumelange	D 2-2	59.0	945	853	58.15%	19.12%	22.73%	+0.96	-2.2	5
2004-04-25	@ Wiltz 71	D 2-2	59.0	853	945	22.73%	19.12%	58.15%	-0.96	+2.2	1
2004-04-30	F91 Dudelange	L 1-3	41.5	1158	1275	30.84%	19.46%	49.70%	-0.47	-19.8	3
2004-04-30	@ Grevenmacher	W 3-1	41.5	1275	1158	49.70%	19.46%	30.84%	+0.47	+19.8	9
2004-04-30	Mondercange	D 1-1	53.9	931	917	48.75%	19.49%	31.77%	+0.42	-1.4	5
2004-04-30	@ Spora Luxembourg	D 1-1	53.9	917	931	31.77%	19.49%	48.75%	-0.42	+1.4	5
2004-04-30	Swift Hesperange	W 2-0	43.0	866	1009	27.58%	19.36%	53.06%	-0.66	+36.1	4
2004-04-30	@ Avenir Beggen	L 0-2	43.0	1009	866	53.06%	19.36%	27.58%	+0.66	-36.1	7
2004-05-02	Union Luxembourg	W 2-1	53.3	855	1111	16.57%	18.59%	64.85%	-1.42	+21.9	4
2004-05-02	@ Rumelange	L 1-2	53.3	1111	855	64.85%	18.59%	16.57%	+1.42	-21.9	4
2004-05-02	Victoria Rosport	D 0-0	50.3	943	934	48.03%	19.50%	32.47%	+0.39	-1.4	6
2004-05-02	@ Wiltz 71	D 0-0	50.3	934	943	32.47%	19.50%	48.03%	-0.39	+1.4	7
2004-05-03	Jeunesse Esch	L 2-3	48.2	1212	1347	28.58%	19.40%	52.02%	-0.60	-10.2	3
2004-05-03	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 3-2	48.2	1347	1212	52.02%	19.40%	28.58%	+0.60	+10.2	9
2004-05-07	Avenir Beggen	L 1-2	49.3	930	902	50.58%	19.44%	29.98%	+0.52	-17.3	5
2004-05-07	@ Spora Luxembourg	W 2-1	49.3	902	930	29.98%	19.44%	50.58%	-0.52	+17.3	7
2004-05-07	Victoria Rosport	W 3-0	29.8	1089	936	64.26%	18.65%	17.10%	+1.38	+19.7	7
2004-05-07	@ Union Luxembourg	L 0-3	29.8	936	1089	17.10%	18.65%	64.26%	-1.38	-19.7	7
2004-05-08	F91 Dudelange	L 1-2	51.9	1357	1295	54.79%	19.29%	25.91%	+0.75	-18.6	9
2004-05-08	@ Jeunesse Esch	W 2-1	51.9	1295	1357	25.91%	19.29%	54.79%	-0.75	+18.6	12
2004-05-08	Grevenmacher	L 1-3	48.6	1201	1138	54.91%	19.29%	25.81%	+0.76	-32.3	3
2004-05-08	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	W 3-1	48.6	1138	1201	25.81%	19.29%	54.91%	-0.76	+32.3	6
2004-05-08	Swift Hesperange	W 1-0	42.0	919	973	39.26%	19.57%	41.16%	-0.05	+15.4	8
2004-05-08	@ Mondercange	L 0-1	42.0	973	919	41.16%	19.57%	39.26%	+0.05	-15.4	7
2004-05-08	Wiltz 71	D 1-1	53.9	877	941	37.88%	19.57%	42.55%	-0.11	+0.4	5
2004-05-08	@ Rumelange	D 1-1	53.9	941	877	42.55%	19.57%	37.88%	+0.11	-0.4	7
2004-05-16	Etzella Ettelbruck	D 0-0	50.9	1313	1169	63.39%	18.73%	17.88%	+1.31	-4.4	13
2004-05-16	@ F91 Dudelange	D 0-0	50.9	1169	1313	17.88%	18.73%	63.39%	-1.31	+4.4	4
2004-05-16	Jeunesse Esch	D 2-2	59.4	1170	1338	24.82%	19.24%	55.94%	-0.82	+1.9	7
2004-05-16	@ Grevenmacher	D 2-2	59.4	1338	1170	55.94%	19.24%	24.82%	+0.82	-1.9	10
2004-05-16	Mondercange	D 2-2	58.8	919	934	44.86%	19.55%	35.59%	+0.23	-0.5	8
2004-05-16	@ Avenir Beggen	D 2-2	58.8	934	919	35.59%	19.55%	44.86%	-0.23	+0.5	9
2004-05-16	Union Luxembourg	W 3-2	55.7	941	1109	24.81%	19.24%	55.96%	-0.82	+18.0	10
2004-05-16	@ Wiltz 71	L 2-3	55.7	1109	941	55.96%	19.24%	24.81%	+0.82	-18.0	7
2004-05-16	Rumelange	L 1-3	47.5	916	878	51.91%	19.40%	28.69%	+0.59	-30.7	7
2004-05-16	@ Victoria Rosport	W 3-1	47.5	878	916	28.69%	19.40%	51.91%	-0.59	+30.7	8
2004-05-16	Spora Luxembourg	L 1-2	49.9	958	913	52.74%	19.37%	27.88%	+0.64	-18.0	7
2004-05-16	@ Swift Hesperange	W 2-1	49.9	913	958	27.88%	19.37%	52.74%	-0.64	+18.0	8

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

#	Date	Underdog Win %	Winning Team			Losing Team
#	Date	Underdog Win %	Team	Elo	Score	Team	Elo	Score
1	2003-08-10	11.80%	Spora Luxembourg	832	3	@ Mondercange	1062	1
2	2003-09-14	12.62%	Etzella Ettelbruck	954	3	@ Jeunesse Esch	1171	1
3	2003-11-09	13.99%	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1046	3	Jeunesse Esch	1337	0
4	2003-09-28	16.27%	@ Spora Luxembourg	990	3	Grevenmacher	1250	1
5	2004-05-02	16.57%	@ Rumelange	855	2	Union Luxembourg	1111	1
6	2003-11-02	16.92%	Victoria Rosport	982	4	@ Grevenmacher	1138	1
7	2003-12-07	18.72%	@ Avenir Beggen	924	1	Grevenmacher	1154	0
8	2004-04-18	19.24%	Wiltz 71	866	4	@ Victoria Rosport	994	0
9	2004-04-24	19.98%	@ Victoria Rosport	915	3	Union Luxembourg	1131	2
10	2004-03-21	21.98%	Mondercange	911	3	@ Victoria Rosport	1010	1
11	2004-03-21	22.06%	Wiltz 71	863	2	@ Spora Luxembourg	962	1
12	2003-09-17	22.08%	Spora Luxembourg	969	4	@ Victoria Rosport	1068	2
13	2003-09-17	22.94%	Wiltz 71	929	2	@ Avenir Beggen	1019	0
14	2003-11-23	23.04%	@ Mondercange	931	2	Grevenmacher	1116	1
15	2003-09-01	23.29%	Spora Luxembourg	906	6	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	993	3
16	2003-12-07	24.54%	@ Rumelange	884	3	Swift Hesperange	1054	1
17	2003-08-24	24.61%	@ Spora Luxembourg	873	3	Avenir Beggen	1043	1
18	2004-05-16	24.81%	@ Wiltz 71	941	3	Union Luxembourg	1109	2
19	2003-09-14	25.06%	Avenir Beggen	999	1	@ Union Luxembourg	1069	0
20	2004-05-08	25.81%	Grevenmacher	1138	3	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1201	1
21	2004-05-08	25.91%	F91 Dudelange	1295	2	@ Jeunesse Esch	1357	1
22	2004-04-30	27.58%	@ Avenir Beggen	866	2	Swift Hesperange	1009	0
23	2003-11-29	27.79%	Avenir Beggen	905	1	@ Mondercange	951	0
24	2004-05-16	27.88%	Spora Luxembourg	913	2	@ Swift Hesperange	958	1
25	2004-05-16	28.69%	Rumelange	878	3	@ Victoria Rosport	916	1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

#	Date	Elo Δ	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Elo Δ	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2004-04-18	79.27	Wiltz 71	4	866	19.24%	@ Victoria Rosport	0	994	61.90%	18.86%
2	2003-11-09	66.32	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	3	1046	13.99%	Jeunesse Esch	0	1337	67.77%	18.24%
3	2003-11-30	57.48	@ Grevenmacher	8	1096	51.59%	Spora Luxembourg	1	1060	29.00%	19.41%
4	2003-11-02	53.23	Victoria Rosport	4	982	16.92%	@ Grevenmacher	1	1138	64.45%	18.63%
5	2003-10-26	50.14	@ Rumelange	3	910	30.07%	Victoria Rosport	0	1033	50.48%	19.44%
6	2003-10-22	47.85	@ Union Luxembourg	3	1066	32.62%	Grevenmacher	0	1169	47.88%	19.50%
7	2004-04-18	43.43	@ Mondercange	3	895	37.72%	Spora Luxembourg	0	960	42.71%	19.57%
8	2003-08-24	42.32	@ Victoria Rosport	8	1031	50.65%	Rumelange	2	1002	29.91%	19.44%
9	2003-08-10	41.03	Spora Luxembourg	3	832	11.80%	@ Mondercange	1	1062	70.34%	17.86%
10	2003-09-14	40.46	Etzella Ettelbruck	3	954	12.62%	@ Jeunesse Esch	1	1171	69.36%	18.01%
11	2003-11-09	39.61	Spora Luxembourg	5	1026	46.09%	@ Rumelange	1	936	34.37%	19.53%
12	2003-10-26	39.39	Union Luxembourg	3	1114	42.55%	@ Swift Hesperange	0	1049	37.88%	19.57%
13	2003-09-17	39.20	Wiltz 71	2	929	22.94%	@ Avenir Beggen	0	1019	57.92%	19.13%
14	2003-11-04	38.29	Jeunesse Esch	4	1299	54.07%	@ Union Luxembourg	0	1147	26.61%	19.32%
15	2003-09-01	38.26	Spora Luxembourg	6	906	23.29%	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	3	993	57.55%	19.15%
16	2003-09-28	38.06	@ Spora Luxembourg	3	990	16.27%	Grevenmacher	1	1250	65.17%	18.55%
17	2004-04-30	36.12	@ Avenir Beggen	2	866	27.58%	Swift Hesperange	0	1009	53.06%	19.36%
18	2003-10-05	35.07	@ Jeunesse Esch	3	1212	47.61%	Grevenmacher	0	1206	32.88%	19.51%
19	2003-09-13	34.77	@ Grevenmacher	4	1175	57.00%	Swift Hesperange	0	1093	23.81%	19.18%
20	2003-10-01	34.68	Etzella Ettelbruck	4	1024	40.47%	@ Mondercange	1	975	39.95%	19.58%
21	2004-03-21	34.52	Mondercange	3	911	21.98%	@ Victoria Rosport	1	1010	58.94%	19.07%
22	2003-11-30	33.61	@ Union Luxembourg	4	1099	57.95%	Victoria Rosport	0	1008	22.92%	19.13%
23	2003-11-09	33.05	@ Mondercange	3	908	49.91%	Wiltz 71	0	885	30.63%	19.46%
24	2003-12-07	33.01	@ Rumelange	3	884	24.54%	Swift Hesperange	1	1054	56.23%	19.22%
25	2003-08-24	32.96	@ Spora Luxembourg	3	873	24.61%	Avenir Beggen	1	1043	56.16%	19.23%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2003-10-22	63.1	@ Rumelange	3	908	26.73%	Etzella Ettelbruck	3	1059	53.94%	19.33%
2	2004-05-16	59.4	@ Grevenmacher	2	1170	24.82%	Jeunesse Esch	2	1338	55.94%	19.24%
3	2003-10-19	59.1	@ Grevenmacher	2	1171	60.55%	Etzella Ettelbruck	2	1057	20.49%	18.96%
4	2004-03-21	59.1	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	2	1203	58.08%	Grevenmacher	2	1112	22.79%	19.12%
5	2003-10-17	59.0	@ Avenir Beggen	2	998	58.12%	Rumelange	2	906	22.76%	19.12%
6	2004-04-25	59.0	@ Wiltz 71	2	945	58.15%	Rumelange	2	853	22.73%	19.12%
7	2003-10-05	58.8	@ Rumelange	2	906	42.23%	Mondercange	2	940	38.20%	19.57%
8	2004-03-14	58.8	@ Mondercange	2	912	46.23%	Rumelange	2	917	34.24%	19.53%
9	2004-05-16	58.8	@ Avenir Beggen	2	919	44.86%	Mondercange	2	934	35.59%	19.55%
10	2004-04-24	57.1	@ Victoria Rosport	3	915	19.98%	Union Luxembourg	2	1131	61.09%	18.92%
11	2004-05-16	55.7	@ Wiltz 71	3	941	24.81%	Union Luxembourg	2	1109	55.96%	19.24%
12	2004-04-10	54.5	@ Union Luxembourg	1	1126	72.69%	Wiltz 71	1	860	9.88%	17.42%
13	2003-10-01	54.4	@ Grevenmacher	1	1212	69.72%	Avenir Beggen	1	990	12.32%	17.96%
14	2003-11-02	54.4	@ Spora Luxembourg	4	1013	40.38%	Etzella Ettelbruck	3	1059	40.04%	19.58%
15	2003-11-30	54.4	@ Jeunesse Esch	1	1280	55.72%	F91 Dudelange	1	1210	25.03%	19.25%
16	2004-04-24	54.4	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1259	32.59%	Jeunesse Esch	2	1362	47.91%	19.50%
17	2003-10-01	54.2	@ Swift Hesperange	1	1075	65.95%	Rumelange	1	902	15.58%	18.47%
18	2003-08-24	54.1	@ F91 Dudelange	1	1122	62.36%	Etzella Ettelbruck	1	989	18.81%	18.82%
19	2003-11-23	54.1	@ Rumelange	1	894	20.75%	Union Luxembourg	1	1102	60.27%	18.98%
20	2003-08-31	54.0	@ Victoria Rosport	3	1073	30.72%	Grevenmacher	2	1191	49.82%	19.46%
21	2003-10-05	54.0	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1	1059	54.96%	Avenir Beggen	1	995	25.76%	19.28%
22	2003-10-22	54.0	@ Victoria Rosport	1	1034	51.97%	Avenir Beggen	1	995	28.63%	19.40%
23	2003-10-26	54.0	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	1	1058	30.25%	F91 Dudelange	1	1179	50.30%	19.45%
24	2003-08-10	53.9	@ Wiltz 71	1	974	32.73%	Union Luxembourg	1	1076	47.77%	19.51%
25	2003-09-21	53.9	@ Wiltz 71	1	968	43.26%	Etzella Ettelbruck	1	995	37.18%	19.56%

#	Date	Excitement	Winning Team				Losing Team				Tie %
#	Date	Excitement	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Team	Score	Elo	Win %	Tie %
1	2004-04-04	26.1	@ Jeunesse Esch	3	1320	76.95%	Swift Hesperange	0	977	6.69%	16.36%
2	2003-10-22	26.5	@ Jeunesse Esch	3	1247	75.30%	Wiltz 71	0	936	7.88%	16.82%
3	2004-03-21	26.5	@ F91 Dudelange	4	1230	71.49%	Swift Hesperange	0	982	10.86%	17.66%
4	2003-10-26	26.6	Jeunesse Esch	4	1256	71.11%	@ Mondercange	0	919	11.17%	17.73%
5	2003-10-31	26.7	@ Jeunesse Esch	8	1273	74.25%	Avenir Beggen	0	981	8.67%	17.08%
6	2003-11-02	26.8	@ F91 Dudelange	5	1178	69.47%	Rumelange	0	960	12.53%	18.00%
7	2004-04-04	26.8	@ Union Luxembourg	4	1108	70.30%	Wiltz 71	0	878	11.83%	17.86%
8	2004-04-04	26.9	@ F91 Dudelange	8	1267	77.47%	Avenir Beggen	1	912	6.33%	16.20%
9	2004-03-25	27.2	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	3	1201	72.95%	Rumelange	0	931	9.68%	17.37%
10	2003-09-21	27.4	@ Grevenmacher	5	1223	67.68%	Mondercange	0	1029	14.07%	18.25%
11	2004-03-27	27.4	F91 Dudelange	4	1246	68.52%	@ Mondercange	0	945	13.34%	18.14%
12	2003-10-01	28.5	@ Jeunesse Esch	5	1180	64.09%	Spora Luxembourg	0	1028	17.25%	18.66%
13	2003-10-05	29.2	@ F91 Dudelange	3	1131	66.34%	Wiltz 71	0	953	15.24%	18.42%
14	2004-04-04	29.6	Grevenmacher	4	1134	60.95%	@ Rumelange	0	919	20.12%	18.93%
15	2004-05-07	29.8	@ Union Luxembourg	3	1089	64.26%	Victoria Rosport	0	936	17.10%	18.65%
16	2003-10-22	29.9	@ F91 Dudelange	2	1170	71.16%	Mondercange	0	928	11.12%	17.72%
17	2004-03-14	30.2	Etzella Ettelbruck	3	1182	63.04%	@ Avenir Beggen	0	946	18.20%	18.76%
18	2003-11-30	30.5	@ Union Luxembourg	4	1099	57.95%	Victoria Rosport	0	1008	22.92%	19.13%
19	2003-12-05	30.8	@ Etzella Ettelbruck	8	1141	68.84%	Mondercange	2	932	13.07%	18.09%
20	2003-09-13	30.9	@ Grevenmacher	4	1175	57.00%	Swift Hesperange	0	1093	23.81%	19.18%
21	2003-12-07	30.9	Jeunesse Esch	2	1278	67.87%	@ Spora Luxembourg	0	985	13.90%	18.23%
22	2003-08-31	31.3	@ Swift Hesperange	3	1069	59.31%	Wiltz 71	0	966	21.64%	19.05%
23	2003-11-04	32.0	Jeunesse Esch	4	1299	54.07%	@ Union Luxembourg	0	1147	26.61%	19.32%
24	2004-04-10	32.1	@ Jeunesse Esch	2	1328	65.20%	Grevenmacher	0	1164	16.25%	18.55%
25	2004-04-18	32.3	@ Union Luxembourg	4	1121	72.14%	Rumelange	1	863	10.32%	17.53%