Home / Leagues / Norway / Main League / 1955-56
‹ ›

1955-56 Main League Season

112 games · 2 promotion-playoff teams

Final

Champion

Larvik Turn

21 points · 3rd Title

Last Title: 1954-55

Relegated

Ranheim

3 pts

Kvik Trondheim · 6 pts

Brann · 11 pts

Varegg · 11 pts

Biggest Overachiever

Fredrikstad

8.08 points above expected

27 points · 18.92 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Ranheim

7.12 points below expected

3 points · 10.12 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Larvik Turn Champion 14 10 1 3 21 40 15 +25 20.43 +0.57
2 Sandefjord 14 7 2 5 16 26 19 +7 15.70 +0.30
3 Viking 14 5 5 4 15 25 26 -1 14.52 +0.48
4 Valerenga 14 5 4 5 14 23 28 -5 13.87 +0.13
5 Rapid Moss 14 4 4 6 12 23 26 -3 12.28 -0.28
6 IF Odd 14 4 4 6 12 18 24 -6 13.22 -1.22
7 Brann Relegated 14 4 3 7 11 27 27 0 12.71 -1.71
8 Varegg Relegated 14 3 5 6 11 15 32 -17 9.27 +1.73
# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Fredrikstad 14 13 1 0 27 54 17 +37 18.92 +8.08
2 Asker 14 11 1 2 23 41 16 +25 17.68 +5.32
3 Skeid 14 7 3 4 17 34 18 +16 17.71 -0.71
4 Lillestrom 14 6 1 7 13 19 25 -6 13.30 -0.30
5 Frigg Oslo 14 6 0 8 12 27 37 -10 11.39 +0.61
6 Sarpsborg 14 3 5 6 11 27 30 -3 13.64 -2.64
7 Kvik Trondheim Relegated 14 2 2 10 6 12 44 -32 9.24 -3.24
8 Ranheim Relegated 14 1 1 12 3 12 39 -27 10.12 -7.12

Notes

  • Larvik Turn defeated Fredrikstad 3-2 in the championship final to win the league title.

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Fredrikstad 27 18.92 +8.08
2 Asker 23 17.68 +5.32
3 Varegg 11 9.27 +1.73
4 Frigg Oslo 12 11.39 +0.61
5 Larvik Turn 21 20.43 +0.57

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Ranheim 3 10.12 -7.12
2 Kvik Trondheim 6 9.24 -3.24
3 Sarpsborg 11 13.64 -2.64
4 Brann 11 12.71 -1.71
5 IF Odd 12 13.22 -1.22

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Fredrikstad 11 Aug 28 – May 27 1 in 347
2 Asker 6 Aug 17 – Oct 23 1 in 78
3 Frigg Oslo 3 May 13 – May 27 1 in 25
4 Sandefjord 4 Oct 2 – Oct 23 1 in 19
5 Larvik Turn 6 Aug 28 – Oct 23 1 in 17

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Ranheim 8 Oct 16 – May 27 1 in 131
2 Valerenga 2 Sep 18 – Oct 2 1 in 18
3 Rapid Moss 4 Oct 9 – Oct 31 1 in 15
4 Sarpsborg 3 Oct 16 – May 6 1 in 14
5 Kvik Trondheim 5 Sep 4 – Apr 29 1 in 10

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Varegg 5 Aug 7 – Oct 2 1 in 83
2 Fredrikstad 14 Jul 31 – May 27 1 in 38
3 Rapid Moss 5 May 6 – May 27 1 in 21
4 Asker 8 Jul 31 – Oct 23 1 in 18
5 Viking 5 Oct 16 – May 6 1 in 10

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Viking 6 Jul 31 – Oct 9 1 in 23
2 Sarpsborg 6 Oct 9 – May 13 1 in 21
3 IF Odd 5 Aug 28 – Oct 9 1 in 14
4 Sandefjord 4 May 6 – May 21 1 in 11
5 Ranheim 8 Oct 16 – May 27 1 in 11

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Fredrikstad 1678 27 +56 10 7.0 +3.0
Asker 1598 23 +20 8 6.6 +1.4
Larvik Turn 1617 21 -8 5 7.4 -2.4
Skeid 1533 17 -36 3 5.1 -2.1
Sandefjord 1482 16 -20 3 5.4 -2.4
Viking 1434 15 -10 6 5.1 +0.9
Valerenga 1402 14 +10 6 5.1 +0.9
Lillestrom 1403 13 +11 5 4.4 +0.6
Rapid Moss 1393 12 +24 7 4.7 +2.3
Frigg Oslo 1379 12 +21 6 3.7 +2.3
IF Odd 1397 12 +0 4 4.4 -0.4
Brann 1413 11 +17 5 4.6 +0.4
Varegg 1264 11 -13 4 3.4 +0.6
Sarpsborg 1396 11 -20 3 5.2 -2.2
Kvik Trondheim 1252 6 +0 3 3.3 -0.3
Ranheim 1246 3 -67 0 3.5 -3.5

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations

Group A

Team BRA IO LT RM SAN VAL VAR VIK
Brann —
1-0-1
2.65
1-0-1
1.32
0-1-1
2.92
1-0-1
2.28
0-1-1
2.67
0-0-2
3.77
1-1-0
2.30
IF Odd
1-0-1
2.96
—
1-0-1
1.50
1-0-1
2.99
1-0-1
2.35
0-1-1
2.80
0-2-0
3.63
0-1-1
2.63
Larvik Turn
1-0-1
4.31
1-0-1
4.12
—
1-1-0
4.33
2-0-0
3.77
2-0-0
4.15
2-0-0
4.36
1-0-1
4.01
Rapid Moss
1-1-0
2.69
1-0-1
2.62
0-1-1
1.29
—
0-0-2
2.34
0-1-1
2.64
1-1-0
3.48
1-0-1
2.35
Sandefjord
1-0-1
3.33
1-0-1
3.26
0-0-2
1.84
2-0-0
3.27
—
2-0-0
3.15
1-1-0
4.21
0-1-1
3.07
Valerenga
1-1-0
2.93
1-1-0
2.81
0-0-2
1.47
1-1-0
2.97
0-0-2
2.45
—
1-0-1
3.74
1-1-0
2.66
Varegg
2-0-0
1.84
0-2-0
1.98
0-0-2
1.27
0-1-1
2.13
0-1-1
1.42
1-0-1
1.87
—
0-1-1
1.90
Viking
0-1-1
3.31
1-1-0
2.98
1-0-1
1.61
1-0-1
3.26
1-1-0
2.54
0-1-1
2.95
1-1-0
3.71
—

Group B

Team ASK FRE FO KT LIL RAN SAR SKE
Asker —
0-0-2
2.65
2-0-0
4.05
2-0-0
4.03
2-0-0
3.62
2-0-0
4.47
1-1-0
3.50
2-0-0
2.80
Fredrikstad
2-0-0
2.96
—
2-0-0
3.98
2-0-0
4.55
2-0-0
4.01
2-0-0
4.57
1-1-0
3.96
2-0-0
3.44
Frigg Oslo
0-0-2
1.56
0-0-2
1.64
—
2-0-0
3.29
1-0-1
2.69
2-0-0
2.73
1-0-1
2.49
0-0-2
1.80
Kvik Trondheim
0-0-2
1.59
0-0-2
1.09
0-0-2
2.32
—
0-0-2
1.84
1-1-0
2.54
1-1-0
1.97
0-0-2
1.36
Lillestrom
0-0-2
2.00
0-0-2
1.60
1-0-1
2.91
2-0-0
3.77
—
1-0-1
3.37
2-0-0
2.56
0-1-1
1.69
Ranheim
0-0-2
1.16
0-0-2
1.06
0-0-2
2.88
0-1-1
3.07
1-0-1
2.24
—
0-0-2
2.06
0-0-2
1.17
Sarpsborg
0-1-1
2.11
0-1-1
1.65
1-0-1
3.12
0-1-1
3.64
0-0-2
3.05
2-0-0
3.55
—
0-2-0
2.15
Skeid
0-0-2
2.81
0-0-2
2.16
2-0-0
3.81
2-0-0
4.26
1-1-0
3.93
2-0-0
4.46
0-2-0
3.46
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.86 +4.9
Allowed 0.74 -6.1
Differential 0.92 +3.1

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
03.57%3.57%3.12%2.68%2.23%1.34%16.52%
13.57%8.93%9.82%4.46%4.91%2.23%33.93%
23.12%9.82%4.46%3.12%0.89%1.79%23.21%
32.68%4.46%3.12%0.89%—0.45%11.61%
42.23%4.91%0.89%—0.89%—8.93%
5+1.34%2.23%1.79%0.45%——5.80%
Total16.52%33.93%23.21%11.61%8.93%5.80%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.89 1.89 +0.00
SD 1.69 1.69 2.65
CV 0.89 0.89 —
Max 11 11 +11
Min 0 0 -11

Games Played: 112

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
1—7.14%7.14%———14.29%
2—35.71%——7.14%—42.86%
3—14.29%————14.29%
47.14%14.29%————21.43%
5+7.14%—————7.14%
Total14.29%71.43%7.14%—7.14%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.93 1.14 +1.79
SD 2.02 0.95 2.61
CV 0.69 0.83 —
Max 9 4 +9
Min 1 0 -2

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.14%————7.14%
1—7.14%14.29%14.29%——35.71%
2—14.29%14.29%14.29%——42.86%
3———————
4—7.14%————7.14%
5+——7.14%———7.14%
Total—35.71%35.71%28.57%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.93 1.93 +0.00
SD 1.49 0.83 1.75
CV 0.77 0.43 —
Max 6 3 +4
Min 0 1 -2

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
1———————
214.29%7.14%————21.43%
37.14%—14.29%———21.43%
47.14%21.43%7.14%—7.14%—42.86%
5+—7.14%7.14%———14.29%
Total28.57%35.71%28.57%—7.14%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 3.86 1.21 +2.64
SD 1.75 1.12 1.82
CV 0.45 0.92 —
Max 8 4 +7
Min 2 0 +0

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——7.14%—7.14%—14.29%
1——14.29%7.14%7.14%—28.57%
2—14.29%———14.29%28.57%
3—7.14%————7.14%
47.14%7.14%7.14%———21.43%
5+———————
Total7.14%28.57%28.57%7.14%14.29%14.29%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.93 2.64 -0.71
SD 1.38 2.17 2.95
CV 0.72 0.82 —
Max 4 7 +4
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%—7.14%———14.29%
114.29%21.43%14.29%—7.14%—57.14%
2———7.14%—7.14%14.29%
3—14.29%————14.29%
4———————
5+———————
Total21.43%35.71%21.43%7.14%7.14%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.29 1.71 -0.43
SD 0.91 1.68 1.74
CV 0.71 0.98 —
Max 3 6 +2
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%14.29%——7.14%14.29%42.86%
1—7.14%14.29%—7.14%14.29%42.86%
2———————
3—14.29%————14.29%
4———————
5+———————
Total7.14%35.71%14.29%—14.29%28.57%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.86 3.14 -2.29
SD 1.03 2.80 3.22
CV 1.20 0.89 —
Max 3 9 +2
Min 0 0 -9

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.14%————7.14%
1——7.14%———7.14%
27.14%35.71%7.14%7.14%——57.14%
37.14%7.14%————14.29%
4———————
5+7.14%7.14%————14.29%
Total21.43%57.14%14.29%7.14%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.86 1.07 +1.79
SD 2.68 0.83 3.12
CV 0.94 0.77 —
Max 11 3 +11
Min 0 0 -1

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%——7.14%7.14%—21.43%
114.29%—14.29%—14.29%—42.86%
2—14.29%—7.14%——21.43%
3—7.14%————7.14%
47.14%—————7.14%
5+———————
Total28.57%21.43%14.29%14.29%21.43%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.36 1.79 -0.43
SD 1.15 1.58 2.28
CV 0.85 0.88 —
Max 4 4 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%—7.14%14.29%14.29%—42.86%
1——14.29%14.29%7.14%7.14%42.86%
2———7.14%——7.14%
3———————
47.14%—————7.14%
5+———————
Total14.29%—21.43%35.71%21.43%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.86 2.79 -1.93
SD 1.10 1.58 2.20
CV 1.28 0.57 —
Max 4 6 +4
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—7.14%7.14%———14.29%
17.14%14.29%7.14%7.14%7.14%—42.86%
27.14%—7.14%7.14%——21.43%
3—7.14%—7.14%——14.29%
4———————
5+———7.14%——7.14%
Total14.29%28.57%21.43%28.57%7.14%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.64 1.86 -0.21
SD 1.34 1.23 1.58
CV 0.81 0.66 —
Max 5 4 +2
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%14.29%————21.43%
114.29%7.14%14.29%——7.14%42.86%
2—7.14%————7.14%
3———————
4—14.29%————14.29%
5+—7.14%7.14%———14.29%
Total21.43%50.00%21.43%——7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.86 1.36 +0.50
SD 1.83 1.50 2.35
CV 0.99 1.10 —
Max 5 6 +4
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———————
1—28.57%7.14%14.29%14.29%—64.29%
27.14%———7.14%—14.29%
37.14%—————7.14%
4————7.14%—7.14%
5+——7.14%———7.14%
Total14.29%28.57%14.29%14.29%28.57%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.93 2.14 -0.21
SD 1.73 1.51 2.29
CV 0.90 0.71 —
Max 7 4 +5
Min 1 0 -3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%—7.14%———14.29%
1—14.29%7.14%7.14%7.14%—35.71%
2—7.14%————7.14%
37.14%—————7.14%
4—14.29%————14.29%
5+7.14%14.29%————21.43%
Total21.43%50.00%14.29%7.14%7.14%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.43 1.29 +1.14
SD 2.03 1.14 2.68
CV 0.83 0.89 —
Max 6 4 +5
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%—7.14%———14.29%
1—7.14%7.14%7.14%—7.14%28.57%
2—14.29%14.29%——7.14%35.71%
37.14%—14.29%———21.43%
4———————
5+———————
Total14.29%21.43%42.86%7.14%—14.29%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.64 2.00 -0.36
SD 1.01 1.52 1.86
CV 0.61 0.76 —
Max 3 5 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
07.14%7.14%7.14%14.29%—7.14%42.86%
1—14.29%7.14%———21.43%
27.14%7.14%7.14%———21.43%
3——7.14%7.14%——14.29%
4———————
5+———————
Total14.29%28.57%28.57%21.43%—7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.07 2.29 -1.21
SD 1.14 2.70 3.17
CV 1.07 1.18 —
Max 3 11 +2
Min 0 0 -11

Games Played: 14

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0———7.14%——7.14%
17.14%14.29%7.14%—7.14%—35.71%
27.14%—21.43%———28.57%
37.14%—14.29%——7.14%28.57%
4———————
5+———————
Total21.43%14.29%42.86%7.14%7.14%7.14%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.79 1.86 -0.07
SD 0.97 1.46 1.73
CV 0.55 0.79 —
Max 3 5 +3
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 14

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Fredrikstad 1669 27 18.92 +8.08 100.0% 12 14 17 19 21 23 25
Larvik Turn 1626 21 20.43 +0.57 66.0% 9 16 19 20 23 24 26
Asker 1598 23 17.68 +5.32 99.0% 10 13 16 18 20 22 24
Skeid 1533 17 17.71 -0.71 47.0% 9 12 15 18 20 22 25
Sandefjord 1482 16 15.70 +0.30 62.0% 9 10 14 16 18 20 24
Viking 1434 15 14.52 +0.48 64.0% 6 10 13 14 16 19 24
Brann 1413 11 12.71 -1.71 33.0% 7 8 11 12 14 18 21
Lillestrom 1403 13 13.30 -0.30 49.0% 6 8 11 14 15 19 20
Valerenga 1402 14 13.87 +0.13 58.0% 7 9 11 13 16 20 22
IF Odd 1397 12 13.22 -1.22 35.0% 5 7 11 13 15 18 22
Sarpsborg 1396 11 13.64 -2.64 20.0% 7 9 12 14 15 19 20
Rapid Moss 1393 12 12.28 -0.28 55.0% 4 7 10 12 14 18 21
Frigg Oslo 1379 12 11.39 +0.61 65.0% 5 8 9 11 13 16 19
Varegg 1264 11 9.27 +1.73 78.0% 3 5 7 9 11 14 16
Kvik Trondheim 1252 6 9.24 -3.24 18.0% 3 4 7 9 11 14 16
Ranheim 1246 3 10.12 -7.12 0.0% 4 6 8 10 12 15 18

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 14.5% * Slight Edge: 14.5% to 17.5% * Clear Edge: 17.5% to 23% * Strong Edge: 23% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+13.39%
No Edge
47.32%18.75%33.93%
Elo Value
Home Edge
107 Elo
0.009 goals per Elo point
046.81300
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.26 goals
Neutral
-2+0.44+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd to 3rd * Middle of the Pack: 4th to 8th * Longshot: 9th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.09 * Tight Race: 0.09 to 0.21 * Comfortable: 0.21 to 0.29 * Runaway: 0.29 and up.
Title-Race Openness
4.4
Open
134610
Champion Preseason Odds
76%
Larvik Turn, 1st of 16
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.29/gm
Comfortable
00.150.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 2.39 * Some Luck: 2.39 to 3.58 * Lucky: 3.58 to 4.78 * Wild Swing: 4.78 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 2.07 * Close: 2.07 to 3.1 * Off: 3.1 to 4.14 * Way Off: 4.14 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 16 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 16 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 16 * As Expected: 16 to 25.6 * Several Outliers: 25.6 to 35.2 * Many Outliers: 35.2 and up.
Unexpected Relegations
Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 1.54 * A Surprise: 1.54 to 2.46 * Several Surprises: 2.46 to 3.39 * Many Surprises: 3.39 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
3.27 points
Some Luck
02.997
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.38
Pinpoint
02.596
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 96.88%
100.00%
Fredrikstad
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 3.12%
0.00%
Ranheim
050
Season Outliers
Expected
3 of 16
Minimal Outliers
01.68
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
1 of 4
As Expected
01.54

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.14 * Even: 0.14 to 0.16 * Top-Heavy: 0.16 to 0.19 * Lopsided: 0.19 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.55 * Strong Separation: 1.55 to 1.75 * Wide Separation: 1.75 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 61.5% * Slight Edge: 61.5% to 65% * Clear Edge: 65% to 69.5% * Wide Edge: 69.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82% * Clear Edge: 82% to 87.5% * Strong Edge: 87.5% to 92.5% * Dominant: 92.5% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 53.5% * Some Drama: 53.5% to 58% * Frequent: 58% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16% * Occasional: 16% to 19% * Frequent: 19% to 25% * Very Frequent: 25% and up.
Gini Index
0.22
Lopsided
00.140.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 126.19
1.78
Wide Separation
0.91.351.551.752.5
Interquartile Edge
65%
Slight Edge
50%61.5%69.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline 94%
92%
Strong Edge
50%100%
Close Games
Expected
52%
Few
0%43%100%
Blowouts
Expected
30%
Very Frequent
0%35%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.32 * Slight Separation: 0.32 to 0.34 * Notable Separation: 0.34 to 0.38 * Lopsided: 0.38 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.28 * Some Carryover: 0.28 to 0.48 * Strong Carryover: 0.48 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23.5% * As Expected: 23.5% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 27.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 27.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19% * As Expected: 19% to 22% * Shaky Favorites: 22% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.54
Highly Predictable
00.572
Matchup Imbalance
0.37
Notable Separation
00.320.380.5
Strangeness
Expected
1.33
Wilder Than Modeled
01.002
Repeatability
0.91
Near-Lock
00.280.481
Upset Rate
Expected
21%
Chalky
0%25%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
18%
Solid Favorites
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.15 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.15 to 0.23 * Above Noise: 0.23 to 0.3 * Well Above Noise: 0.3 and up.
Probability calibration
0.37
Well Calibrated
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.48
Very Underconfident
0.3806581.001.61934
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.076
Well Within Noise
00.1500.4

Promotion Playoff

The path the promotion-playoff teams took to determine the final promotion spot. The sections below show matchup heatmaps and round-by-round simulation outcomes.

Finals

Larvik Turn 3
Fredrikstad 2

Sim: 17.0%

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team12345678
Larvik Turn76.00%18.00%4.00%——1.00%—1.00%
Sandefjord9.00%32.00%18.00%21.00%8.00%7.00%5.00%—
Viking4.00%16.00%22.00%18.00%19.00%16.00%3.00%2.00%
Valerenga4.00%18.00%11.00%16.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%9.00%
Rapid Moss1.00%5.00%12.00%14.00%11.00%18.00%21.00%18.00%
IF Odd3.00%5.00%19.00%18.00%18.00%12.00%12.00%13.00%
Brann3.00%6.00%9.00%11.00%26.00%18.00%22.00%5.00%
Varegg——5.00%2.00%6.00%14.00%21.00%52.00%
Team12345678
Fredrikstad42.00%31.00%15.00%9.00%2.00%1.00%——
Asker27.00%31.00%24.00%7.00%8.00%1.00%2.00%—
Skeid25.00%26.00%26.00%10.00%7.00%3.00%3.00%—
Lillestrom5.00%3.00%15.00%22.00%24.00%15.00%8.00%8.00%
Frigg Oslo—2.00%5.00%12.00%14.00%30.00%26.00%11.00%
Sarpsborg—7.00%9.00%29.00%26.00%21.00%4.00%4.00%
Kvik Trondheim——1.00%8.00%5.00%15.00%20.00%51.00%
Ranheim1.00%—5.00%3.00%14.00%14.00%37.00%26.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Stochastic Promotion/Relegation Outcomes

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations from preseason Elo, the probability of each team's next-season outcome — promotion-positive outcomes on the left, relegation-positive on the right. The round buttons switch to heatmaps of how often each pair of teams met in that round of the playoff across the simulations, since every iteration produces a different field.

Team Same level Direct relegation
Fredrikstad — —
Larvik Turn — —
Asker 71.00% 2.00%
Skeid 72.00% 3.00%
Sandefjord 86.00% 5.00%
Viking 91.00% 5.00%
Sarpsborg 92.00% 8.00%
Lillestrom 79.00% 16.00%
IF Odd 72.00% 25.00%
Valerenga 71.00% 25.00%
Brann 70.00% 27.00%
Frigg Oslo 63.00% 37.00%
Rapid Moss 60.00% 39.00%
Ranheim 36.00% 63.00%
Kvik Trondheim 29.00% 71.00%
Varegg 27.00% 73.00%
Loser →
↓ Winner
AskerBrannFredrikstadIF OddLarvik TurnLillestromRapid MossSandefjordSarpsborgSkeidValerengaViking
Asker100.0%2.00%42.9%28.00%0.0%1.00%75.0%4.00%
Brann0.0%2.00%0.0%1.00%100.0%1.00%
Fredrikstad100.0%1.00%100.0%1.00%50.0%34.00%0.0%1.00%100.0%2.00%100.0%2.00%66.7%3.00%
IF Odd0.0%1.00%100.0%1.00%
Larvik Turn57.1%28.00%50.0%34.00%100.0%1.00%53.8%13.00%
Lillestrom0.0%1.00%
Rapid Moss100.0%1.00%0.0%1.00%
Sandefjord0.0%2.00%100.0%1.00%50.0%2.00%
Sarpsborg0.0%1.00%0.0%1.00%
Skeid0.0%1.00%46.2%13.00%100.0%1.00%50.0%2.00%0.0%1.00%
Valerenga100.0%1.00%0.0%2.00%
Viking25.0%4.00%33.3%3.00%100.0%1.00%

Actual Promotion/Relegation Outcomes

Just the teams that actually reached the promotion playoff. With the field fixed in place, the playoff sim re-runs every tie and tallies how often each team won each round — the table gives those probabilities, and the final round's column is the chance of winning the playoff outright. The round buttons switch to heatmaps of how often each pairing met in that round.

Team Finals
Fredrikstad 58.00%
Larvik Turn 42.00%
Loser →
↓ Winner
FredrikstadLarvik Turn
Fredrikstad58.0%100.00%
Larvik Turn42.0%100.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1955-07-31 Brann W 3-144.4 1428 1416 51.84% 19.65% 28.51%+0.56 +12.2 2
1955-07-31 @ IF Odd L 1-344.4 1416 1428 28.51% 19.65% 51.84%-0.56 -12.2 0
1955-07-31 Rapid Moss W 4-141.3 1445 1395 56.25% 19.55% 24.20%+0.91 +15.0 2
1955-07-31 @ Sandefjord L 1-441.3 1395 1445 24.20% 19.55% 56.25%-0.91 -15.0 0
1955-07-31 Viking D 2-261.9 1425 1431 49.51% 19.68% 30.81%+0.38 -0.7 1
1955-07-31 @ Valerenga D 2-261.9 1431 1425 30.81% 19.68% 49.51%-0.38 +0.7 1
1955-07-31 Larvik Turn L 0-1137.5 1325 1537 22.85% 19.28% 57.87%-1.55 -57.4 0
1955-07-31 @ Varegg W 11-037.5 1537 1325 57.87% 19.28% 22.85%+1.55 +57.4 2
1955-07-31 Fredrikstad L 2-745.8 1395 1529 32.03% 19.60% 48.38%-0.82 -25.0 0
1955-07-31 @ Frigg Oslo W 7-245.8 1529 1395 48.38% 19.60% 32.03%+0.82 +25.0 2
1955-07-31 Asker L 1-246.0 1338 1487 30.19% 19.55% 50.26%-0.95 -7.4 0
1955-07-31 @ Kvik Trondheim W 2-146.0 1487 1338 50.26% 19.55% 30.19%+0.95 +7.4 2
1955-07-31 Ranheim W 2-144.1 1429 1383 55.78% 19.56% 24.66%+0.87 +6.2 2
1955-07-31 @ Lillestrom L 1-244.1 1383 1429 24.66% 19.56% 55.78%-0.87 -6.2 0
1955-07-31 Skeid D 1-159.6 1417 1508 37.73% 19.68% 42.59%-0.42 +0.2 1
1955-07-31 @ Sarpsborg D 1-159.6 1508 1417 42.59% 19.68% 37.73%+0.42 -0.2 1
1955-08-07 Sandefjord W 2-149.4 1403 1460 42.67% 19.71% 37.62%-0.09 +8.8 2
1955-08-07 @ Brann L 1-249.4 1460 1403 37.62% 19.71% 42.67%+0.09 -8.8 2
1955-08-07 Valerenga W 3-145.7 1595 1424 67.39% 18.94% 13.67%+2.04 +6.3 4
1955-08-07 @ Larvik Turn L 1-345.7 1424 1595 13.67% 18.94% 67.39%-2.04 -6.3 1
1955-08-07 IF Odd W 2-042.1 1380 1440 42.13% 19.71% 38.16%-0.13 +17.9 2
1955-08-07 @ Rapid Moss L 0-242.1 1440 1380 38.16% 19.71% 42.13%+0.13 -17.9 2
1955-08-07 Varegg D 2-259.0 1432 1267 66.92% 18.98% 14.10%+1.98 -2.3 2
1955-08-07 @ Viking D 2-259.0 1267 1432 14.10% 18.98% 66.92%-1.98 +2.3 1
1955-08-07 Sarpsborg D 1-159.2 1494 1417 59.14% 19.45% 21.41%+1.16 -2.1 3
1955-08-07 @ Asker D 1-159.2 1417 1494 21.41% 19.45% 59.14%-1.16 +2.1 2
1955-08-07 Lillestrom W 4-144.1 1554 1435 63.15% 19.25% 17.60%+1.55 +11.3 4
1955-08-07 @ Fredrikstad L 1-444.1 1435 1554 17.60% 19.25% 63.15%-1.55 -11.3 2
1955-08-07 Frigg Oslo L 0-441.6 1377 1370 51.11% 19.66% 29.23%+0.50 -43.4 0
1955-08-07 @ Ranheim W 4-041.6 1370 1377 29.23% 19.66% 51.11%-0.50 +43.4 2
1955-08-07 Kvik Trondheim W 5-136.4 1508 1331 67.85% 18.90% 13.25%+2.10 +11.2 3
1955-08-07 @ Skeid L 1-536.4 1331 1508 13.25% 18.90% 67.85%-2.10 -11.2 0
1955-08-15 Brann W 3-254.0 1270 1412 30.87% 19.57% 49.56%-0.90 +10.5 3
1955-08-15 @ Varegg L 2-354.0 1412 1270 49.56% 19.57% 30.87%+0.90 -10.5 2
1955-08-16 Rapid Moss W 3-249.8 1418 1398 52.74% 19.63% 27.63%+0.63 +6.5 3
1955-08-16 @ Valerenga L 2-349.8 1398 1418 27.63% 19.63% 52.74%-0.63 -6.5 2
1955-08-17 Larvik Turn W 1-055.8 1423 1601 26.56% 19.44% 54.00%-1.23 +12.7 4
1955-08-17 @ IF Odd L 0-155.8 1601 1423 54.00% 19.44% 26.56%+1.23 -12.7 4
1955-08-17 Viking D 1-158.2 1451 1429 52.98% 19.63% 27.39%+0.65 -1.4 3
1955-08-17 @ Sandefjord D 1-158.2 1429 1451 27.39% 19.63% 52.98%-0.65 +1.4 3
1955-08-17 Skeid L 1-251.0 1413 1519 35.76% 19.66% 44.58%-0.55 -8.5 2
1955-08-17 @ Frigg Oslo W 2-151.0 1519 1413 44.58% 19.66% 35.76%+0.55 +8.5 5
1955-08-17 Asker L 1-448.7 1424 1492 41.04% 19.70% 39.25%-0.20 -23.2 2
1955-08-17 @ Lillestrom W 4-148.7 1492 1424 39.25% 19.70% 41.04%+0.20 +23.2 5
1955-08-17 Fredrikstad D 4-473.4 1419 1565 30.44% 19.56% 50.00%-0.93 +0.6 3
1955-08-17 @ Sarpsborg D 4-473.4 1565 1419 50.00% 19.56% 30.44%+0.93 -0.6 5
1955-08-18 Ranheim D 0-050.6 1320 1333 48.53% 19.69% 31.79%+0.31 -1.0 1
1955-08-18 @ Kvik Trondheim D 0-050.6 1333 1320 31.79% 19.69% 48.53%-0.31 +1.0 1
1955-08-27 Frigg Oslo W 2-145.2 1515 1405 62.37% 19.30% 18.33%+1.47 +4.8 7
1955-08-27 @ Asker L 1-245.2 1405 1515 18.33% 19.30% 62.37%-1.47 -4.8 2
1955-08-28 Valerenga D 2-261.2 1402 1424 47.32% 19.70% 32.98%+0.23 -0.6 3
1955-08-28 @ Brann D 2-261.2 1424 1402 32.98% 19.70% 47.32%-0.23 +0.6 4
1955-08-28 Viking W 3-039.6 1588 1431 66.41% 19.02% 14.57%+1.92 +11.3 6
1955-08-28 @ Larvik Turn L 0-339.6 1431 1588 14.57% 19.02% 66.41%-1.92 -11.3 3
1955-08-28 Varegg D 3-362.9 1391 1280 62.47% 19.29% 18.24%+1.48 -1.5 3
1955-08-28 @ Rapid Moss D 3-362.9 1280 1391 18.24% 19.29% 62.47%-1.48 +1.5 4
1955-08-28 IF Odd W 4-143.8 1450 1435 52.08% 19.64% 28.28%+0.58 +17.1 5
1955-08-28 @ Sandefjord L 1-443.8 1435 1450 28.28% 19.64% 52.08%-0.58 -17.1 4
1955-08-28 Ranheim W 3-246.5 1564 1334 71.40% 18.48% 10.12%+2.60 +2.6 7
1955-08-28 @ Fredrikstad L 2-346.5 1334 1564 10.12% 18.48% 71.40%-2.60 -2.6 1
1955-08-28 Sarpsborg W 3-146.7 1319 1419 36.44% 19.67% 43.89%-0.51 +17.3 3
1955-08-28 @ Kvik Trondheim L 1-346.7 1419 1319 43.89% 19.67% 36.44%+0.51 -17.3 3
1955-08-28 Lillestrom W 3-037.0 1527 1401 63.87% 19.21% 16.92%+1.63 +12.9 7
1955-08-28 @ Skeid L 0-337.0 1401 1527 16.92% 19.21% 63.87%-1.63 -12.9 2
1955-09-04 Valerenga L 1-252.3 1418 1425 49.40% 19.68% 30.92%+0.38 -11.1 4
1955-09-04 @ IF Odd W 2-152.3 1425 1418 30.92% 19.68% 49.40%-0.38 +11.1 6
1955-09-04 Kvik Trondheim W 4-138.6 1400 1336 57.76% 19.50% 22.74%+1.04 +14.2 4
1955-09-04 @ Frigg Oslo L 1-438.6 1336 1400 22.74% 19.50% 57.76%-1.04 -14.2 3
1955-09-18 Rapid Moss L 1-350.1 1401 1390 51.68% 19.65% 28.67%+0.55 -20.0 3
1955-09-18 @ Brann W 3-150.1 1390 1401 28.67% 19.65% 51.68%-0.55 +20.0 5
1955-09-18 Viking D 1-156.6 1407 1419 48.68% 19.69% 31.63%+0.32 -0.9 5
1955-09-18 @ IF Odd D 1-156.6 1419 1407 31.63% 19.69% 48.68%-0.32 +0.9 4
1955-09-18 Larvik Turn L 1-254.9 1467 1599 32.18% 19.60% 48.22%-0.80 -7.8 5
1955-09-18 @ Sandefjord W 2-154.9 1599 1467 48.22% 19.60% 32.18%+0.80 +7.8 8
1955-09-18 Varegg L 0-248.4 1436 1282 66.16% 19.05% 14.80%+1.89 -29.3 6
1955-09-18 @ Valerenga W 2-048.4 1282 1436 14.80% 19.05% 66.16%-1.89 +29.3 6
1955-09-18 Fredrikstad L 0-435.5 1322 1567 19.67% 19.10% 61.23%-1.86 -19.2 3
1955-09-18 @ Kvik Trondheim W 4-035.5 1567 1322 61.23% 19.10% 19.67%+1.86 +19.2 9
1955-09-18 Frigg Oslo W 4-037.4 1388 1414 46.78% 19.70% 33.51%+0.19 +30.5 4
1955-09-18 @ Lillestrom L 0-437.4 1414 1388 33.51% 19.70% 46.78%-0.19 -30.5 4
1955-09-18 Ranheim W 2-035.5 1402 1332 58.45% 19.48% 22.07%+1.10 +11.3 5
1955-09-18 @ Sarpsborg L 0-235.5 1332 1402 22.07% 19.48% 58.45%-1.10 -11.3 1
1955-09-18 Asker L 1-260.8 1540 1520 52.81% 19.63% 27.56%+0.63 -11.8 7
1955-09-18 @ Skeid W 2-160.8 1520 1540 27.56% 19.63% 52.81%-0.63 +11.8 9
1955-10-02 Brann W 2-145.1 1607 1381 71.15% 18.52% 10.34%+2.56 +2.8 10
1955-10-02 @ Larvik Turn L 1-245.1 1381 1607 10.34% 18.52% 71.15%-2.56 -2.8 3
1955-10-02 Sandefjord L 2-551.4 1407 1459 43.24% 19.71% 37.05%-0.05 -21.0 6
1955-10-02 @ Valerenga W 5-251.4 1459 1407 37.05% 19.71% 43.24%+0.05 +21.0 7
1955-10-02 IF Odd D 1-154.5 1311 1406 37.20% 19.68% 43.12%-0.45 +0.3 7
1955-10-02 @ Varegg D 1-154.5 1406 1311 43.12% 19.68% 37.20%+0.45 -0.3 6
1955-10-02 Sarpsborg L 2-746.5 1384 1413 46.38% 19.70% 33.92%+0.16 -34.0 4
1955-10-02 @ Frigg Oslo W 7-246.5 1413 1384 33.92% 19.70% 46.38%-0.16 +34.0 7
1955-10-09 IF Odd W 6-244.2 1378 1406 46.66% 19.70% 33.63%+0.18 +21.6 5
1955-10-09 @ Brann L 2-644.2 1406 1378 33.63% 19.70% 46.66%-0.18 -21.6 6
1955-10-09 Varegg W 2-035.3 1610 1311 75.03% 17.85% 7.12%+3.24 +3.9 12
1955-10-09 @ Larvik Turn L 0-235.3 1311 1610 7.12% 17.85% 75.03%-3.24 -3.9 7
1955-10-09 Sandefjord L 0-147.1 1410 1480 40.72% 19.70% 39.57%-0.22 -10.0 5
1955-10-09 @ Rapid Moss W 1-047.1 1480 1410 39.57% 19.70% 40.72%+0.22 +10.0 9
1955-10-09 Valerenga L 1-252.9 1420 1386 54.47% 19.60% 25.93%+0.76 -12.1 4
1955-10-09 @ Viking W 2-152.9 1386 1420 25.93% 19.60% 54.47%-0.76 +12.1 8
1955-10-09 Kvik Trondheim W 9-032.2 1532 1303 71.32% 18.49% 10.19%+2.59 +22.6 11
1955-10-09 @ Asker L 0-932.2 1303 1532 10.19% 18.49% 71.32%-2.59 -22.6 3
1955-10-09 Frigg Oslo W 2-036.8 1586 1350 71.77% 18.43% 9.80%+2.66 +5.3 11
1955-10-09 @ Fredrikstad L 0-236.8 1350 1586 9.80% 18.43% 71.77%-2.66 -5.3 4
1955-10-09 Lillestrom W 4-039.2 1320 1418 36.85% 19.67% 43.48%-0.48 +37.7 3
1955-10-09 @ Ranheim L 0-439.2 1418 1320 43.48% 19.67% 36.85%+0.48 -37.7 4
1955-10-09 Sarpsborg D 1-161.5 1529 1447 59.56% 19.43% 21.01%+1.20 -2.1 8
1955-10-09 @ Skeid D 1-161.5 1447 1529 21.01% 19.43% 59.56%-1.20 +2.1 8
1955-10-16 Rapid Moss W 3-144.0 1384 1400 48.25% 19.69% 32.06%+0.29 +13.4 8
1955-10-16 @ IF Odd L 1-344.0 1400 1384 32.06% 19.69% 48.25%-0.29 -13.4 5
1955-10-16 Brann W 1-040.9 1490 1400 60.46% 19.39% 20.15%+1.29 +5.5 11
1955-10-16 @ Sandefjord L 0-140.9 1400 1490 20.15% 19.39% 60.46%-1.29 -5.5 5
1955-10-16 Larvik Turn L 1-249.8 1398 1614 22.47% 19.26% 58.26%-1.59 -5.7 8
1955-10-16 @ Valerenga W 2-149.8 1614 1398 58.26% 19.26% 22.47%+1.59 +5.7 14
1955-10-16 Viking L 0-337.8 1308 1408 36.43% 19.67% 43.90%-0.51 -25.0 7
1955-10-16 @ Varegg W 3-037.8 1408 1308 43.90% 19.67% 36.43%+0.51 +25.0 6
1955-10-16 Ranheim W 3-142.6 1344 1358 48.50% 19.69% 31.81%+0.31 +13.3 6
1955-10-16 @ Frigg Oslo L 1-342.6 1358 1344 31.81% 19.69% 48.50%-0.31 -13.3 3
1955-10-16 Skeid L 0-532.9 1280 1526 19.56% 19.09% 61.35%-1.87 -23.6 3
1955-10-16 @ Kvik Trondheim W 5-032.9 1526 1280 61.35% 19.09% 19.56%+1.87 +23.6 10
1955-10-16 Fredrikstad L 2-353.2 1380 1592 22.98% 19.29% 57.73%-1.54 -5.5 4
1955-10-16 @ Lillestrom W 3-253.2 1592 1380 57.73% 19.29% 22.98%+1.54 +5.5 13
1955-10-16 Asker L 1-450.3 1450 1554 35.89% 19.66% 44.45%-0.54 -20.8 8
1955-10-16 @ Sarpsborg W 4-150.3 1554 1450 44.45% 19.66% 35.89%+0.54 +20.8 13
1955-10-23 Larvik Turn L 1-249.1 1386 1620 20.78% 19.17% 60.05%-1.75 -5.3 5
1955-10-23 @ Rapid Moss W 2-149.1 1620 1386 60.05% 19.17% 20.78%+1.75 +5.3 16
1955-10-23 Sandefjord L 1-242.7 1283 1496 22.77% 19.28% 57.95%-1.56 -5.8 7
1955-10-23 @ Varegg W 2-142.7 1496 1283 57.95% 19.28% 22.77%+1.56 +5.8 13
1955-10-23 Brann D 2-261.2 1433 1395 54.95% 19.58% 25.47%+0.80 -1.2 7
1955-10-23 @ Viking D 2-261.2 1395 1433 25.47% 19.58% 54.95%-0.80 +1.2 6
1955-10-23 Asker L 0-436.9 1345 1575 21.06% 19.19% 59.75%-1.72 -20.4 3
1955-10-23 @ Ranheim W 4-036.9 1575 1345 59.75% 19.19% 21.06%+1.72 +20.4 15
1955-10-30 Fredrikstad L 2-466.6 1595 1597 50.05% 19.67% 30.28%+0.42 -17.4 15
1955-10-30 @ Asker W 4-266.6 1597 1595 30.28% 19.67% 50.05%-0.42 +17.4 15
1955-10-30 Lillestrom L 1-253.5 1429 1375 56.66% 19.54% 23.80%+0.94 -12.6 8
1955-10-30 @ Sarpsborg W 2-153.5 1375 1429 23.80% 19.54% 56.66%-0.94 +12.6 6
1955-10-31 Rapid Moss W 2-037.7 1432 1381 56.33% 19.55% 24.13%+0.92 +12.2 9
1955-10-31 @ Viking L 0-237.7 1381 1432 24.13% 19.55% 56.33%-0.92 -12.2 5
1956-04-29 Larvik Turn W 3-266.2 1444 1625 26.28% 19.43% 54.29%-1.26 +11.4 11
1956-04-29 @ Viking L 2-366.2 1625 1444 54.29% 19.43% 26.28%+1.26 -11.5 16
1956-04-29 Ranheim W 6-135.4 1550 1324 71.13% 18.52% 10.35%+2.56 +10.9 12
1956-04-29 @ Skeid L 1-635.4 1324 1550 10.35% 18.52% 71.13%-2.56 -10.9 3
1956-04-29 Kvik Trondheim W 1-034.9 1388 1257 64.23% 19.19% 16.59%+1.67 +4.6 8
1956-04-29 @ Lillestrom L 0-134.9 1257 1388 16.59% 19.19% 64.23%-1.67 -4.6 3
1956-05-06 Varegg L 1-253.2 1396 1277 63.17% 19.25% 17.57%+1.56 -14.0 6
1956-05-06 @ Brann W 2-153.2 1277 1396 17.57% 19.25% 63.17%-1.56 +14.0 9
1956-05-06 IF Odd W 2-146.1 1613 1398 70.51% 18.60% 10.89%+2.46 +3.0 18
1956-05-06 @ Larvik Turn L 1-246.1 1398 1613 10.89% 18.60% 70.51%-2.46 -3.0 8
1956-05-06 Valerenga D 1-155.2 1369 1392 47.24% 19.70% 33.06%+0.22 -0.7 6
1956-05-06 @ Rapid Moss D 1-155.2 1392 1369 33.06% 19.70% 47.24%-0.22 +0.7 9
1956-05-06 Sandefjord W 1-048.1 1456 1501 44.16% 19.71% 36.13%+0.01 +9.1 13
1956-05-06 @ Viking L 0-148.1 1501 1456 36.13% 19.71% 44.16%-0.01 -9.1 13
1956-05-06 Lillestrom W 2-145.2 1578 1392 68.52% 18.83% 12.65%+2.18 +3.4 17
1956-05-06 @ Asker L 1-245.2 1392 1578 12.65% 18.83% 68.52%-2.18 -3.4 8
1956-05-06 Sarpsborg W 4-143.8 1614 1416 69.37% 18.74% 11.89%+2.30 +7.8 17
1956-05-06 @ Fredrikstad L 1-443.8 1416 1614 11.89% 18.74% 69.37%-2.30 -7.9 8
1956-05-06 Kvik Trondheim L 1-349.0 1313 1252 57.50% 19.51% 22.99%+1.02 -22.1 3
1956-05-06 @ Ranheim W 3-149.0 1252 1313 22.99% 19.51% 57.50%-1.02 +22.1 5
1956-05-06 Frigg Oslo W 4-139.6 1561 1358 69.69% 18.70% 11.61%+2.35 +7.7 14
1956-05-06 @ Skeid L 1-439.6 1358 1561 11.61% 18.70% 69.69%-2.35 -7.7 6
1956-05-10 Sandefjord W 1-047.8 1395 1492 36.86% 19.67% 43.47%-0.48 +10.5 10
1956-05-10 @ IF Odd L 0-147.8 1492 1395 43.47% 19.67% 36.86%+0.48 -10.5 13
1956-05-10 Brann W 3-249.2 1393 1382 51.66% 19.65% 28.69%+0.54 +6.7 11
1956-05-10 @ Valerenga L 2-349.2 1382 1393 28.69% 19.65% 51.66%-0.54 -6.7 6
1956-05-10 Rapid Moss L 0-142.2 1291 1368 39.70% 19.70% 40.61%-0.29 -9.8 9
1956-05-10 @ Varegg W 1-042.2 1368 1291 40.61% 19.70% 39.70%+0.29 +9.8 8
1956-05-10 Asker L 1-344.7 1350 1581 20.95% 19.18% 59.87%-1.73 -9.3 6
1956-05-10 @ Frigg Oslo W 3-144.7 1581 1350 59.87% 19.18% 20.95%+1.73 +9.3 19
1956-05-10 Skeid D 0-057.7 1389 1569 26.40% 19.44% 54.17%-1.25 +1.7 9
1956-05-10 @ Lillestrom D 0-057.7 1569 1389 54.17% 19.44% 26.40%+1.25 -1.7 15
1956-05-10 Fredrikstad L 0-335.1 1291 1622 12.99% 18.47% 68.54%-2.67 -10.0 3
1956-05-10 @ Ranheim W 3-035.1 1622 1291 68.54% 18.47% 12.99%+2.67 +10.0 19
1956-05-10 Kvik Trondheim D 1-154.2 1408 1274 64.51% 19.17% 16.32%+1.70 -2.7 9
1956-05-10 @ Sarpsborg D 1-154.2 1274 1408 16.32% 19.17% 64.51%-1.70 +2.7 6
1956-05-13 Viking W 4-146.7 1375 1465 37.97% 19.68% 42.34%-0.40 +23.8 8
1956-05-13 @ Brann L 1-446.7 1465 1375 42.34% 19.68% 37.97%+0.40 -23.8 13
1956-05-13 Rapid Moss D 2-267.1 1616 1378 71.89% 18.41% 9.70%+2.68 -2.7 19
1956-05-13 @ Larvik Turn D 2-267.1 1378 1616 9.70% 18.41% 71.89%-2.68 +2.7 9
1956-05-13 Varegg D 0-052.4 1482 1281 69.55% 18.72% 11.74%+2.33 -3.8 14
1956-05-13 @ Sandefjord D 0-052.4 1281 1482 11.74% 18.72% 69.55%-2.33 +3.8 10
1956-05-13 IF Odd D 0-052.9 1400 1405 49.53% 19.68% 30.79%+0.39 -1.1 12
1956-05-13 @ Valerenga D 0-052.9 1405 1400 30.79% 19.68% 49.53%-0.39 +1.1 11
1956-05-13 Asker W 2-157.1 1632 1591 55.29% 19.58% 25.14%+0.83 +6.3 21
1956-05-13 @ Fredrikstad L 1-257.1 1591 1632 25.14% 19.58% 55.29%-0.83 -6.3 19
1956-05-13 Frigg Oslo L 1-246.3 1277 1341 41.62% 19.71% 38.68%-0.16 -9.6 6
1956-05-13 @ Kvik Trondheim W 2-146.3 1341 1277 38.68% 19.71% 41.62%+0.16 +9.6 8
1956-05-13 Sarpsborg W 3-144.3 1390 1406 48.31% 19.69% 32.00%+0.30 +13.4 11
1956-05-13 @ Lillestrom L 1-344.3 1406 1390 32.00% 19.69% 48.31%-0.30 -13.4 9
1956-05-13 Skeid L 1-438.9 1281 1567 16.22% 18.83% 64.95%-2.24 -10.4 3
1956-05-13 @ Ranheim W 4-138.9 1567 1281 64.95% 18.83% 16.22%+2.24 +10.4 17
1956-05-16 Skeid W 2-050.1 1639 1577 57.49% 19.51% 23.00%+1.02 +11.7 23
1956-05-16 @ Fredrikstad L 0-250.1 1577 1639 23.00% 19.51% 57.49%-1.02 -11.7 17
1956-05-21 Sandefjord W 6-145.1 1614 1478 64.63% 19.16% 16.22%+1.71 +16.6 21
1956-05-21 @ Larvik Turn L 1-645.1 1478 1614 16.22% 19.16% 64.63%-1.71 -16.6 14
1956-05-21 Brann D 1-155.6 1381 1399 47.92% 19.69% 32.39%+0.27 -0.8 10
1956-05-21 @ Rapid Moss D 1-155.6 1399 1381 32.39% 19.69% 47.92%-0.27 +0.8 9
1956-05-21 Valerenga L 0-336.8 1285 1398 34.65% 19.64% 45.71%-0.63 -24.0 10
1956-05-21 @ Varegg W 3-036.8 1398 1285 45.71% 19.64% 34.65%+0.63 +24.0 14
1956-05-21 IF Odd W 3-250.0 1441 1406 54.46% 19.60% 25.95%+0.76 +6.2 15
1956-05-21 @ Viking L 2-350.0 1406 1441 25.95% 19.60% 54.46%-0.76 -6.2 11
1956-05-21 Skeid W 3-154.5 1584 1566 52.60% 19.63% 27.76%+0.62 +11.9 21
1956-05-21 @ Asker L 1-354.5 1566 1584 27.76% 19.63% 52.60%-0.62 -11.9 17
1956-05-21 Kvik Trondheim W 8-133.7 1650 1267 78.48% 16.94% 4.59%+4.04 +6.6 25
1956-05-21 @ Fredrikstad L 1-833.7 1267 1650 4.59% 16.94% 78.48%-4.04 -6.6 6
1956-05-21 Lillestrom W 2-146.7 1350 1404 43.11% 19.71% 37.18%-0.06 +8.7 10
1956-05-21 @ Frigg Oslo L 1-246.7 1404 1350 37.18% 19.71% 43.11%+0.06 -8.8 11
1956-05-21 Sarpsborg L 0-336.3 1271 1392 33.64% 19.63% 46.73%-0.70 -23.4 3
1956-05-21 @ Ranheim W 3-036.3 1392 1271 46.73% 19.63% 33.64%+0.70 +23.4 11
1956-05-27 Larvik Turn W 2-161.7 1400 1630 21.02% 19.18% 59.80%-1.73 +13.2 11
1956-05-27 @ Brann L 1-261.7 1630 1400 59.80% 19.18% 21.02%+1.73 -13.2 21
1956-05-27 Varegg D 1-154.0 1400 1261 64.95% 19.14% 15.91%+1.75 -2.8 12
1956-05-27 @ IF Odd D 1-154.0 1261 1400 15.91% 19.14% 64.95%-1.75 +2.8 11
1956-05-27 Viking W 5-354.3 1380 1447 41.18% 19.71% 39.12%-0.19 +13.3 12
1956-05-27 @ Rapid Moss L 3-554.3 1447 1380 39.12% 19.71% 41.18%+0.19 -13.3 15
1956-05-27 Valerenga W 5-141.5 1462 1422 54.99% 19.58% 25.42%+0.81 +20.2 16
1956-05-27 @ Sandefjord L 1-541.5 1422 1462 25.42% 19.58% 54.99%-0.81 -20.1 14
1956-05-27 Ranheim W 2-138.5 1596 1247 77.19% 17.32% 5.49%+3.71 +1.5 23
1956-05-27 @ Asker L 1-238.5 1247 1596 5.49% 17.32% 77.19%-3.71 -1.5 3
1956-05-27 Lillestrom L 0-139.8 1261 1395 31.92% 19.59% 48.49%-0.82 -8.2 6
1956-05-27 @ Kvik Trondheim W 1-039.8 1395 1261 48.49% 19.59% 31.92%+0.82 +8.2 13
1956-05-27 Frigg Oslo L 2-455.6 1416 1359 56.95% 19.53% 23.53%+0.97 -19.6 11
1956-05-27 @ Sarpsborg W 4-255.6 1359 1416 23.53% 19.53% 56.95%-0.97 +19.6 12
1956-05-27 Fredrikstad L 1-456.8 1554 1657 36.08% 19.66% 44.26%-0.53 -20.9 17
1956-05-27 @ Skeid W 4-156.8 1657 1554 44.26% 19.66% 36.08%+0.53 +20.9 27

Playoff Game Log

Every playoff game for the team selected at the top of the tab (empty if they didn't reach the postseason). Sort any column by clicking its header. @ before an opponent name indicates an away game; the record column shows the team's running playoff record.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Record
1956-06-03 Fredrikstad W 3-267.0 1617 1678 42.07% 19.71% 38.22%-0.13 +8.5 1-0
1956-06-03 @ Larvik Turn L 2-367.0 1678 1617 38.22% 19.71% 42.07%+0.13 -8.5 0-1

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1955-09-18 14.80% Varegg 1282 2 @ Valerenga 1436 0
2 1956-05-06 17.57% Varegg 1277 2 @ Brann 1396 1
3 1956-05-27 21.02% @ Brann 1400 2 Larvik Turn 1630 1
4 1956-05-06 22.99% Kvik Trondheim 1252 3 @ Ranheim 1313 1
5 1956-05-27 23.53% Frigg Oslo 1359 4 @ Sarpsborg 1416 2
6 1955-10-30 23.80% Lillestrom 1375 2 @ Sarpsborg 1429 1
7 1955-10-09 25.93% Valerenga 1386 2 @ Viking 1420 1
8 1956-04-29 26.28% @ Viking 1444 3 Larvik Turn 1625 2
9 1955-08-17 26.56% @ IF Odd 1423 1 Larvik Turn 1601 0
10 1955-09-18 27.56% Asker 1520 2 @ Skeid 1540 1
11 1955-09-18 28.67% Rapid Moss 1390 3 @ Brann 1401 1
12 1955-08-07 29.23% Frigg Oslo 1370 4 @ Ranheim 1377 0
13 1955-10-30 30.28% Fredrikstad 1597 4 @ Asker 1595 2
14 1955-08-15 30.87% @ Varegg 1270 3 Brann 1412 2
15 1955-09-04 30.92% Valerenga 1425 2 @ IF Odd 1418 1
16 1955-10-02 33.92% Sarpsborg 1413 7 @ Frigg Oslo 1384 2
17 1955-08-28 36.44% @ Kvik Trondheim 1319 3 Sarpsborg 1419 1
18 1955-10-09 36.85% @ Ranheim 1320 4 Lillestrom 1418 0
19 1956-05-10 36.86% @ IF Odd 1395 1 Sandefjord 1492 0
20 1955-10-02 37.05% Sandefjord 1459 5 @ Valerenga 1407 2
21 1956-05-13 37.97% @ Brann 1375 4 Viking 1465 1
22 1956-05-13 38.68% Frigg Oslo 1341 2 @ Kvik Trondheim 1277 1
23 1955-08-17 39.25% Asker 1492 4 @ Lillestrom 1424 1
24 1955-10-09 39.57% Sandefjord 1480 1 @ Rapid Moss 1410 0

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1955-07-31 57.39 Larvik Turn 11 1537 57.87% @ Varegg 0 1325 22.85% 19.28%
2 1955-08-07 43.38 Frigg Oslo 4 1370 29.23% @ Ranheim 0 1377 51.11% 19.66%
3 1955-10-09 37.67 @ Ranheim 4 1320 36.85% Lillestrom 0 1418 43.48% 19.67%
4 1955-10-02 33.99 Sarpsborg 7 1413 33.92% @ Frigg Oslo 2 1384 46.38% 19.70%
5 1955-09-18 30.49 @ Lillestrom 4 1388 46.78% Frigg Oslo 0 1414 33.51% 19.70%
6 1955-09-18 29.34 Varegg 2 1282 14.80% @ Valerenga 0 1436 66.16% 19.05%
7 1955-07-31 25.04 Fredrikstad 7 1529 48.38% @ Frigg Oslo 2 1395 32.03% 19.60%
8 1955-10-16 24.97 Viking 3 1408 43.90% @ Varegg 0 1308 36.43% 19.67%
9 1956-05-21 23.97 Valerenga 3 1398 45.71% @ Varegg 0 1285 34.65% 19.64%
10 1956-05-13 23.79 @ Brann 4 1375 37.97% Viking 1 1465 42.34% 19.68%
11 1955-10-16 23.58 Skeid 5 1526 61.35% @ Kvik Trondheim 0 1280 19.56% 19.09%
12 1956-05-21 23.39 Sarpsborg 3 1392 46.73% @ Ranheim 0 1271 33.64% 19.63%
13 1955-08-17 23.19 Asker 4 1492 39.25% @ Lillestrom 1 1424 41.04% 19.70%
14 1955-10-09 22.62 @ Asker 9 1532 71.32% Kvik Trondheim 0 1303 10.19% 18.49%
15 1956-05-06 22.10 Kvik Trondheim 3 1252 22.99% @ Ranheim 1 1313 57.50% 19.51%
16 1955-10-09 21.62 @ Brann 6 1378 46.66% IF Odd 2 1406 33.63% 19.70%
17 1955-10-02 20.96 Sandefjord 5 1459 37.05% @ Valerenga 2 1407 43.24% 19.71%
18 1956-05-27 20.89 Fredrikstad 4 1657 44.26% @ Skeid 1 1554 36.08% 19.66%
19 1955-10-16 20.80 Asker 4 1554 44.45% @ Sarpsborg 1 1450 35.89% 19.66%
20 1955-10-23 20.44 Asker 4 1575 59.75% @ Ranheim 0 1345 21.06% 19.19%
21 1956-05-27 20.15 @ Sandefjord 5 1462 54.99% Valerenga 1 1422 25.42% 19.58%
22 1955-09-18 20.01 Rapid Moss 3 1390 28.67% @ Brann 1 1401 51.68% 19.65%
23 1956-05-27 19.59 Frigg Oslo 4 1359 23.53% @ Sarpsborg 2 1416 56.95% 19.53%
24 1955-09-18 19.23 Fredrikstad 4 1567 61.23% @ Kvik Trondheim 0 1322 19.67% 19.10%
25 1955-08-07 17.86 @ Rapid Moss 2 1380 42.13% IF Odd 0 1440 38.16% 19.71%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1955-08-17 73.4 @ Sarpsborg 4 1419 30.44% Fredrikstad 4 1565 50.00% 19.56%
2 1956-05-13 67.1 @ Larvik Turn 2 1616 71.89% Rapid Moss 2 1378 9.70% 18.41%
3 1956-06-03 * 67.0 @ Larvik Turn 3 1617 42.07% Fredrikstad 2 1678 38.22% 19.71%
4 1955-10-30 66.6 Fredrikstad 4 1597 30.28% @ Asker 2 1595 50.05% 19.67%
5 1956-04-29 66.2 @ Viking 3 1444 26.28% Larvik Turn 2 1625 54.29% 19.43%
6 1955-08-28 62.9 @ Rapid Moss 3 1391 62.47% Varegg 3 1280 18.24% 19.29%
7 1955-07-31 61.9 @ Valerenga 2 1425 49.51% Viking 2 1431 30.81% 19.68%
8 1956-05-27 61.7 @ Brann 2 1400 21.02% Larvik Turn 1 1630 59.80% 19.18%
9 1955-10-09 61.5 @ Skeid 1 1529 59.56% Sarpsborg 1 1447 21.01% 19.43%
10 1955-08-28 61.2 @ Brann 2 1402 47.32% Valerenga 2 1424 32.98% 19.70%
11 1955-10-23 61.2 @ Viking 2 1433 54.95% Brann 2 1395 25.47% 19.58%
12 1955-09-18 60.8 Asker 2 1520 27.56% @ Skeid 1 1540 52.81% 19.63%
13 1955-07-31 59.6 @ Sarpsborg 1 1417 37.73% Skeid 1 1508 42.59% 19.68%
14 1955-08-07 59.2 @ Asker 1 1494 59.14% Sarpsborg 1 1417 21.41% 19.45%
15 1955-08-07 59.0 @ Viking 2 1432 66.92% Varegg 2 1267 14.10% 18.98%
16 1955-08-17 58.2 @ Sandefjord 1 1451 52.98% Viking 1 1429 27.39% 19.63%
17 1956-05-10 57.7 @ Lillestrom 0 1389 26.40% Skeid 0 1569 54.17% 19.44%
18 1956-05-13 57.1 @ Fredrikstad 2 1632 55.29% Asker 1 1591 25.14% 19.58%
19 1956-05-27 56.8 Fredrikstad 4 1657 44.26% @ Skeid 1 1554 36.08% 19.66%
20 1955-09-18 56.6 @ IF Odd 1 1407 48.68% Viking 1 1419 31.63% 19.69%
21 1955-08-17 55.8 @ IF Odd 1 1423 26.56% Larvik Turn 0 1601 54.00% 19.44%
22 1956-05-21 55.6 @ Rapid Moss 1 1381 47.92% Brann 1 1399 32.39% 19.69%
23 1956-05-27 55.6 Frigg Oslo 4 1359 23.53% @ Sarpsborg 2 1416 56.95% 19.53%
24 1956-05-06 55.2 @ Rapid Moss 1 1369 47.24% Valerenga 1 1392 33.06% 19.70%
25 1955-09-18 54.9 Larvik Turn 2 1599 48.22% @ Sandefjord 1 1467 32.18% 19.60%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1955-10-09 32.2 @ Asker 9 1532 71.32% Kvik Trondheim 0 1303 10.19% 18.49%
2 1955-10-16 32.9 Skeid 5 1526 61.35% @ Kvik Trondheim 0 1280 19.56% 19.09%
3 1956-05-21 33.7 @ Fredrikstad 8 1650 78.48% Kvik Trondheim 1 1267 4.59% 16.94%
4 1956-04-29 34.9 @ Lillestrom 1 1388 64.23% Kvik Trondheim 0 1257 16.59% 19.19%
5 1956-05-10 35.1 Fredrikstad 3 1622 68.54% @ Ranheim 0 1291 12.99% 18.47%
6 1955-10-09 35.3 @ Larvik Turn 2 1610 75.03% Varegg 0 1311 7.12% 17.85%
7 1956-04-29 35.4 @ Skeid 6 1550 71.13% Ranheim 1 1324 10.35% 18.52%
8 1955-09-18 35.5 Fredrikstad 4 1567 61.23% @ Kvik Trondheim 0 1322 19.67% 19.10%
9 1955-09-18 35.5 @ Sarpsborg 2 1402 58.45% Ranheim 0 1332 22.07% 19.48%
10 1956-05-21 36.3 Sarpsborg 3 1392 46.73% @ Ranheim 0 1271 33.64% 19.63%
11 1955-08-07 36.4 @ Skeid 5 1508 67.85% Kvik Trondheim 1 1331 13.25% 18.90%
12 1955-10-09 36.8 @ Fredrikstad 2 1586 71.77% Frigg Oslo 0 1350 9.80% 18.43%
13 1956-05-21 36.8 Valerenga 3 1398 45.71% @ Varegg 0 1285 34.65% 19.64%
14 1955-10-23 36.9 Asker 4 1575 59.75% @ Ranheim 0 1345 21.06% 19.19%
15 1955-08-28 37.0 @ Skeid 3 1527 63.87% Lillestrom 0 1401 16.92% 19.21%
16 1955-09-18 37.4 @ Lillestrom 4 1388 46.78% Frigg Oslo 0 1414 33.51% 19.70%
17 1955-07-31 37.5 Larvik Turn 11 1537 57.87% @ Varegg 0 1325 22.85% 19.28%
18 1955-10-31 37.7 @ Viking 2 1432 56.33% Rapid Moss 0 1381 24.13% 19.55%
19 1955-10-16 37.8 Viking 3 1408 43.90% @ Varegg 0 1308 36.43% 19.67%
20 1956-05-27 38.5 @ Asker 2 1596 77.19% Ranheim 1 1247 5.49% 17.32%
21 1955-09-04 38.6 @ Frigg Oslo 4 1400 57.76% Kvik Trondheim 1 1336 22.74% 19.50%
22 1956-05-13 38.9 Skeid 4 1567 64.95% @ Ranheim 1 1281 16.22% 18.83%
23 1955-10-09 39.2 @ Ranheim 4 1320 36.85% Lillestrom 0 1418 43.48% 19.67%
24 1955-08-28 39.6 @ Larvik Turn 3 1588 66.41% Viking 0 1431 14.57% 19.02%
25 1956-05-06 39.6 @ Skeid 4 1561 69.69% Frigg Oslo 1 1358 11.61% 18.70%