‹ ›

1985 First Division Season

132 games

Final

Champion

Rosenborg

33 points · 4th Title

Last Title: 1971

Relegated

Eik Tonsberg

8 pts

Brann · 19 pts

Moss · via playoff

Biggest Overachiever

Rosenborg

7.84 points above expected

33 points · 25.16 expected points

Biggest Disappointment

Eik Tonsberg

9.60 points below expected

8 points · 17.60 expected points

League Table

The final standings for the season. vsSim shows actual points minus the simulation's mean — positive means the team overachieved against the model, negative means they underperformed.

# Team GP W D L Pts GF GA GD SimPts vsSim
1 Rosenborg Champion 22 15 3 4 33 43 22 +21 25.16 +7.84
2 Lillestrom 22 12 8 2 32 39 11 +28 26.99 +5.01
3 Valerenga 22 9 6 7 24 44 31 +13 25.18 -1.18
4 Kongsvinger 22 9 6 7 24 33 34 -1 21.65 +2.35
5 Mjondalen 22 9 4 9 22 40 31 +9 20.58 +1.42
6 Start 22 9 3 10 21 40 44 -4 20.75 +0.25
7 Viking 22 8 5 9 21 28 36 -8 21.71 -0.71
8 Molde 22 7 7 8 21 25 33 -8 20.36 +0.64
9 Bryne 22 6 8 8 20 34 29 +5 23.26 -3.26
10 Moss Relegated 22 7 5 10 19 29 34 -5 20.41 -1.41
11 Brann Relegated 22 8 3 11 19 26 34 -8 20.35 -1.35
12 Eik Tonsberg Relegated 22 2 4 16 8 15 57 -42 17.60 -9.60

Top Overachievers & Disappointments

Teams that most beat — or most fell short of — their simulated point projections. A positive vsSim means the team accumulated more points than the model expected on average; a negative one means fewer.

Biggest Overachievers

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Rosenborg 33 25.16 +7.84
2 Lillestrom 32 26.99 +5.01
3 Kongsvinger 24 21.65 +2.35
4 Mjondalen 22 20.58 +1.42
5 Molde 21 20.36 +0.64

Biggest Disappointments

# Team Actual Sim vsSim
1 Eik Tonsberg 8 17.60 -9.60
2 Bryne 20 23.26 -3.26
3 Moss 19 20.41 -1.41
4 Brann 19 20.35 -1.35
5 Valerenga 24 25.18 -1.18

Top Streaks

Ranked by model unlikelihood — the product of pregame W/D/L probabilities over the games in each team's streak. A short streak by a poor team can outrank a longer one by a strong team since the poor team's per-game probabilities were lower going in. Unbeaten counts consecutive wins or ties; Winless counts consecutive losses or ties.

Most Unlikely Winning Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Rosenborg 6 Sep 1 – Oct 13 1 in 81
2 Lillestrom 4 May 5 – May 19 1 in 33
3 Moss 3 Jun 30 – Aug 11 1 in 18
4 Kongsvinger 3 Aug 11 – Aug 25 1 in 12
5 Molde 2 May 16 – May 19 1 in 12

Most Unlikely Losing Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Eik Tonsberg 8 Aug 11 – Sep 29 1 in 72
2 Brann 4 Aug 7 – Aug 25 1 in 37
3 Moss 4 May 19 – Jun 10 1 in 32
4 Bryne 3 Aug 19 – Aug 28 1 in 15
5 Start 2 May 5 – May 12 1 in 12

Most Unlikely Unbeaten Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Lillestrom 15 Apr 27 – Aug 25 1 in 119
2 Molde 6 Aug 4 – Sep 1 1 in 43
3 Viking 7 May 27 – Aug 7 1 in 41
4 Mjondalen 8 Jun 30 – Sep 8 1 in 29
5 Rosenborg 9 Aug 19 – Oct 13 1 in 27

Most Unlikely Winless Streaks

# Team Games Dates Probability
1 Bryne 9 Jul 3 – Sep 15 1 in 87
2 Eik Tonsberg 15 May 27 – Sep 29 1 in 84
3 Brann 7 Jun 17 – Aug 25 1 in 15
4 Valerenga 4 May 30 – Jun 16 1 in 13
5 Moss 6 May 19 – Jun 24 1 in 12

Position Race

Each team’s league position across the whole season. Colored teams are the season’s headline finishers — champion, promoted, and relegated; everyone else is gray as context.

Recent Form

Each team’s last 5 games, hottest first. Form shows the results (navy win, gray draw, red loss, newest on the right); the bars show Elo change over the window, points taken, points expected from the odds, and actual minus expected. Beside each team: current Elo and season points.

Team Elo Season Pts Form Elo Δ (5) Points (5) Expected (5) Actual − Exp
Rosenborg 1326 33 +42 10 6.3 +3.7
Lillestrom 1361 32 +11 6 5.8 +0.2
Valerenga 1288 24 -26 5 6.2 -1.2
Kongsvinger 1188 24 -42 5 4.8 +0.2
Mjondalen 1282 22 +58 6 4.8 +1.2
Start 1189 21 +48 7 5.1 +1.9
Molde 1178 21 -25 3 4.7 -1.7
Viking 1154 21 -42 2 3.9 -1.9
Bryne 1214 20 -5 5 6.1 -1.1
Brann 1168 19 +13 6 5.0 +1.0
Moss 1181 19 -13 3 4.4 -1.4
Eik Tonsberg 1025 8 -19 2 2.9 -0.9

Head-to-Head

Each cell shows a team's record in that matchup (row vs column, formatted W-D-L) with the model's expected points on the line below. Navy-tinted cells mean the team beat the model's expectations by more than one point in that matchup; gold-tinted cells mean they fell short by the same margin.

Beat expectations Fell short Within expectations
Team BRA BRY ET KON LIL MJO MOL MOS ROS STA VAL VIK
Brann —
2-0-0
2.39
2-0-0
3.29
0-1-1
2.78
0-0-2
1.93
0-1-1
2.52
0-1-1
2.62
2-0-0
2.64
0-0-2
2.46
0-0-2
2.87
1-0-1
2.28
1-0-1
2.68
Bryne
0-0-2
3.12
—
1-0-1
3.72
1-1-0
2.65
0-2-0
2.42
1-1-0
3.07
1-0-1
2.89
1-1-0
3.04
0-0-2
2.55
0-1-1
3.23
0-1-1
2.40
1-1-0
2.88
Eik Tonsberg
0-0-2
2.21
1-0-1
1.80
—
0-0-2
2.40
0-0-2
1.54
0-0-2
2.15
0-2-0
2.59
0-1-1
2.51
0-0-2
1.78
0-0-2
2.32
0-1-1
1.71
1-0-1
2.07
Kongsvinger
1-1-0
2.72
0-1-1
2.86
2-0-0
3.12
—
0-2-0
1.99
0-0-2
2.95
1-0-1
2.82
0-1-1
2.91
1-1-0
2.39
1-0-1
3.27
2-0-0
1.94
1-0-1
2.72
Lillestrom
2-0-0
3.59
0-2-0
3.10
2-0-0
3.99
0-2-0
3.52
—
2-0-0
3.61
1-1-0
3.41
1-0-1
3.53
1-0-1
3.07
2-0-0
3.36
0-2-0
3.01
1-1-0
3.44
Mjondalen
1-1-0
2.98
0-1-1
2.44
2-0-0
3.35
2-0-0
2.55
0-0-2
1.90
—
0-1-1
2.78
1-0-1
2.78
0-1-1
2.27
2-0-0
2.61
0-0-2
2.33
1-0-1
2.75
Molde
1-1-0
2.89
1-0-1
2.62
0-2-0
2.91
1-0-1
2.68
0-1-1
2.11
1-1-0
2.73
—
0-1-1
2.82
0-0-2
2.35
0-1-1
2.98
2-0-0
1.87
1-0-1
2.32
Moss
0-0-2
2.86
0-1-1
2.47
1-1-0
3.00
1-1-0
2.59
1-0-1
1.99
1-0-1
2.73
1-1-0
2.69
—
0-0-2
2.06
1-0-1
2.88
1-0-1
1.93
0-1-1
2.59
Rosenborg
2-0-0
3.04
2-0-0
2.95
2-0-0
3.76
0-1-1
3.11
1-0-1
2.44
1-1-0
3.24
2-0-0
3.16
2-0-0
3.45
—
2-0-0
3.53
0-1-1
2.36
1-0-1
3.49
Start
2-0-0
2.63
1-1-0
2.28
2-0-0
3.20
1-0-1
2.24
0-0-2
2.15
0-0-2
2.90
1-1-0
2.53
1-0-1
2.62
0-0-2
1.98
—
0-0-2
2.33
1-1-0
2.58
Valerenga
1-0-1
3.24
1-1-0
3.12
1-1-0
3.83
0-0-2
3.58
0-2-0
2.50
2-0-0
3.18
0-0-2
3.65
1-0-1
3.58
1-1-0
3.15
2-0-0
3.20
—
0-1-1
3.54
Viking
1-0-1
2.83
0-1-1
2.63
1-0-1
3.45
1-0-1
2.78
0-1-1
2.07
1-0-1
2.76
1-0-1
3.18
1-1-0
2.92
1-0-1
2.02
0-1-1
2.93
1-1-0
1.97
—

Points vs. Goals Scored, Allowed, and Differential

Points plotted against goals scored, allowed, and differential. Use the buttons to switch views; hover a team for exact values. The table gives each fit's R² and slope (the change in points per 10 goals).

Fit Metrics

R² Slope
Scored 0.62 +5.8
Allowed 0.79 -5.2
Differential 0.87 +3.4

Scoreline Distribution

Percentage of games ending with each combination of team-goals (rows) and opponent-goals (columns). The diagonal shows draws; cells below the diagonal are wins from the row team's perspective, cells above are losses. Marginal totals on the right and bottom show how often each goal count occurred regardless of opponent. Use the picker to switch between the league-wide view and any individual team.

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
06.82%7.58%4.92%3.79%1.52%2.27%26.89%
17.58%12.88%6.82%3.03%1.89%2.27%34.47%
24.92%6.82%3.03%3.03%0.38%0.38%18.56%
33.79%3.03%3.03%0.76%0.38%—10.98%
41.52%1.89%0.38%0.38%——4.17%
5+2.27%2.27%0.38%———4.92%
Total26.89%34.47%18.56%10.98%4.17%4.92%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 1.50 +0.00
SD 1.49 1.49 2.32
CV 0.99 0.99 —
Max 8 8 +8
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 132

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%22.73%——4.55%4.55%40.91%
19.09%—4.55%4.55%4.55%—22.73%
2—13.64%—4.55%——18.18%
39.09%——4.55%——13.64%
4—4.55%————4.55%
5+———————
Total27.27%40.91%4.55%13.64%9.09%4.55%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.18 1.55 -0.36
SD 1.26 1.63 2.19
CV 1.07 1.05 —
Max 4 6 +3
Min 0 0 -6

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%9.09%————13.64%
1—31.82%13.64%4.55%——50.00%
24.55%9.09%—4.55%4.55%—22.73%
3——4.55%———4.55%
44.55%—————4.55%
5+4.55%—————4.55%
Total18.18%50.00%18.18%9.09%4.55%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.55 1.32 +0.23
SD 1.37 1.04 1.85
CV 0.89 0.79 —
Max 6 4 +6
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%9.09%4.55%9.09%4.55%9.09%45.45%
14.55%9.09%13.64%9.09%4.55%9.09%50.00%
2———————
3———————
44.55%—————4.55%
5+———————
Total18.18%18.18%18.18%18.18%9.09%18.18%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 0.68 2.59 -1.91
SD 0.89 2.20 2.56
CV 1.31 0.85 —
Max 4 8 +4
Min 0 0 -8

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
09.09%4.55%—4.55%—4.55%22.73%
19.09%13.64%———9.09%31.82%
29.09%9.09%4.55%9.09%——31.82%
3—9.09%————9.09%
4———————
5+4.55%—————4.55%
Total31.82%36.36%4.55%13.64%—13.64%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.50 1.55 -0.05
SD 1.37 1.71 2.44
CV 0.91 1.11 —
Max 6 5 +6
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
013.64%4.55%4.55%———22.73%
118.18%18.18%————36.36%
213.64%—4.55%———18.18%
39.09%4.55%————13.64%
4———————
5+4.55%4.55%————9.09%
Total59.09%31.82%9.09%———100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.77 0.50 +1.27
SD 1.97 0.67 2.14
CV 1.11 1.35 —
Max 8 2 +8
Min 0 0 -2

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%13.64%4.55%———22.73%
1—9.09%9.09%4.55%—4.55%27.27%
24.55%9.09%—4.55%——18.18%
39.09%4.55%—4.55%——18.18%
4—4.55%————4.55%
5+4.55%4.55%————9.09%
Total22.73%45.45%13.64%13.64%—4.55%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.82 1.41 +0.41
SD 1.56 1.40 2.32
CV 0.86 1.00 —
Max 5 6 +5
Min 0 0 -5

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
018.18%—4.55%—4.55%—27.27%
14.55%13.64%9.09%9.09%4.55%—40.91%
29.09%9.09%———4.55%22.73%
34.55%—4.55%———9.09%
4———————
5+———————
Total36.36%22.73%18.18%9.09%9.09%4.55%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.14 1.50 -0.36
SD 0.94 1.65 1.87
CV 0.83 1.10 —
Max 3 6 +3
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%9.09%9.09%4.55%——27.27%
19.09%13.64%13.64%——4.55%40.91%
29.09%—4.55%4.55%——18.18%
3——9.09%———9.09%
4———————
5+——4.55%———4.55%
Total22.73%22.73%40.91%9.09%—4.55%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.32 1.55 -0.23
SD 1.39 1.22 1.77
CV 1.06 0.79 —
Max 6 5 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0——4.55%4.55%——9.09%
122.73%9.09%9.09%———40.91%
24.55%9.09%4.55%———18.18%
3—9.09%4.55%———13.64%
44.55%9.09%————13.64%
5+—4.55%————4.55%
Total31.82%40.91%22.73%4.55%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.95 1.00 +0.95
SD 1.40 0.87 1.76
CV 0.71 0.87 —
Max 5 3 +4
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%9.09%9.09%4.55%—9.09%36.36%
1—9.09%4.55%—4.55%—18.18%
2———————
39.09%4.55%13.64%—4.55%—31.82%
4—4.55%————4.55%
5+—9.09%————9.09%
Total13.64%36.36%27.27%4.55%9.09%9.09%100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.82 2.00 -0.18
SD 1.84 1.83 3.00
CV 1.01 0.91 —
Max 6 7 +5
Min 0 0 -7

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
04.55%4.55%13.64%4.55%——27.27%
14.55%13.64%4.55%———22.73%
2—9.09%9.09%4.55%——22.73%
3—4.55%————4.55%
4——4.55%4.55%——9.09%
5+9.09%4.55%————13.64%
Total18.18%36.36%31.82%13.64%——100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 2.00 1.41 +0.59
SD 2.05 0.96 2.48
CV 1.02 0.68 —
Max 7 3 +7
Min 0 0 -3

Games Played: 22

↓ Scored | Allowed →012345+Total
0—4.55%4.55%13.64%4.55%—27.27%
19.09%13.64%—4.55%4.55%—31.82%
24.55%13.64%9.09%4.55%——31.82%
34.55%—————4.55%
44.55%—————4.55%
5+———————
Total22.73%31.82%13.64%22.73%9.09%—100%

Summary Statistics

Scored Allowed Difference
Mean 1.27 1.64 -0.36
SD 1.08 1.33 2.11
CV 0.85 0.81 —
Max 4 4 +4
Min 0 0 -4

Games Played: 22

Season Summary

Every team's regular-season finish compared against 100,000 simulations. Click any column header to sort. Luck is the team's actual points minus the sim's mean — positive means the team beat the model. Percentile is where the actual result fell in the team's sim distribution (e.g. 90% = the team did this well or better in only 10% of sims).

Team Elo Points Avg Luck Percentile Min 5th Q1 Median Q3 95th Max
Lillestrom 1361 32 26.99 +5.01 90.0% 19 20 24 27 29 34 36
Rosenborg 1326 33 25.16 +7.84 99.0% 12 17 22 25 28 32 35
Valerenga 1288 24 25.18 -1.18 40.0% 17 20 23 25 27 31 35
Mjondalen 1282 22 20.58 +1.42 67.0% 9 14 18 21 23 27 30
Bryne 1214 20 23.26 -3.26 22.0% 14 17 21 23 26 30 33
Start 1189 21 20.75 +0.25 63.0% 9 15 19 21 23 26 31
Kongsvinger 1188 24 21.65 +2.35 76.0% 9 16 19 21 24 29 29
Moss 1181 19 20.41 -1.41 42.0% 12 14 18 20 23 27 31
Molde 1178 21 20.36 +0.64 62.0% 10 14 17 21 23 27 31
Brann 1168 19 20.35 -1.35 40.0% 9 14 18 21 23 24 34
Viking 1154 21 21.71 -0.71 52.0% 12 15 19 21 24 29 33
Eik Tonsberg 1025 8 17.60 -9.60 2.0% 8 10 15 17 20 24 28

Point Totals in Context

How did each team's actual results compare to their simulated points, Elo rating, average opponent Elo, and percentile within simulated outcomes? Use the buttons to switch between views. In each chart, dashed crosshairs at the league means split the plot into four quadrants: pastel green (team did well, model agreed), pastel red (team did poorly, model agreed), and pastel yellow (model and reality disagreed).

Home-Field Advantage Edge

The simulation applies the same home-field boost to every game across the league, so the per-game home win probabilities bake in the model's idea of HFA. For each team, we sum expected points at home and compare to actual home points, and the same on the road. The bar shows (home points above expected) minus (away points above expected). A tall positive bar means the team's home/road split exceeded what the model predicted — a real fortress effect. A tall negative bar means the reverse: they played worse at home or better on the road than expected.

Season Trends

How each metric evolved across the season - Elo rating, actual and projected points, title/promotion probability, and relegation probability - day by day.

Edges & Scoring

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Home Edge
Share of matches won by the home team minus the share won by the away team.
No Edge: under 14.5% * Slight Edge: 14.5% to 17.5% * Clear Edge: 17.5% to 23% * Strong Edge: 23% and up.
Elo Value
Number of Elo rating points one goal is worth. A team this many Elo points better than another is expected to win by one goal on a neutral field.
Scoring Tilt
Average home goals minus average away goals per match. The gold line is the home goals edge implied by the scoring value of an Elo point and the home-field Elo bonus.
Road-Tilted: under -0.2 * Neutral: -0.2 to 0.5 * Home-Tilted: 0.5 to 1.2 * Strong Home: 1.2 and up.
Home Edge
HomeDrawAway
+20.45%
Clear Edge
48.48%23.48%28.03%
Elo Value
Home Edge
132 Elo
0.008 goals per Elo point
072.08400
Scoring Tilt
Expected
+0.67 goals
Home-Tilted
-2+0.54+2

Title Race

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Title-Race Openness
Effective number of teams with a live shot at finishing 1st, from the simulation. 1 means the favorite is a near-lock; larger means a wide-open race. Equal to 1 divided by the sum of squared title odds.
One-Team Race: under 3 * Top-Heavy: 3 to 4 * Open: 4 to 6 * Wide Open: 6 and up.
Champion Preseason Odds
Preseason probability that the eventual champion would finish 1st, from the simulation. The dot marks their rank across all teams, from longshot to favorite.
Preseason Favorite: 1st * Among the Favorites: 2nd * Middle of the Pack: 3rd to 6th * Longshot: 7th or lower.
Title Margin
Points-per-game gap between the champion and the runner-up. Shown per game so it reads the same across long and short seasons. The gold line is the winning margin the model expected, so a dot to the right means a more one-sided race than projected. A title won on goal difference shows 0.00.
Photo Finish: under 0.09 * Tight Race: 0.09 to 0.21 * Comfortable: 0.21 to 0.29 * Runaway: 0.29 and up.
Title-Race Openness
4.6
Open
134610
Champion Preseason Odds
24%
Rosenborg, 2nd of 12
LongshotFavorite
Title Margin
Expected
0.05/gm
Photo Finish
00.120.5/gm

Simulation-Based Surprises

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Luck Spread
Standard deviation of the gap between each team's actual points and their simulated average points. The gold line is the spread the model expected from chance alone.
As Expected: under 3.16 * Some Luck: 3.16 to 4.74 * Lucky: 4.74 to 6.33 * Wild Swing: 6.33 and up.
Average Finish Error
Average gap between where each team was projected to finish and where they actually finished in the table.
Pinpoint: under 2.11 * Close: 2.11 to 3.17 * Off: 3.17 to 4.23 * Way Off: 4.23 and up.
Biggest Overachiever
The team that finished highest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the top team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Biggest Underachiever
The team that finished lowest inside its own range of simulated outcomes. The gold line is where the bottom team in a league of 12 typically lands.
Season Outliers
Number of teams that finished above the 95th or below the 5th percentile of their own simulated range. Even a well-calibrated model expects about 10% of teams in the extremes.
Minimal Outliers: under 12 * As Expected: 12 to 19.2 * Several Outliers: 19.2 to 26.4 * Many Outliers: 26.4 and up.
Unexpected Relegations
Number of teams that were actually relegated but were not in the model's projected bottom field of the same size. The gold line is how many the model expected to miss on average.
As Expected: under 1.98 * A Surprise: 1.98 to 3.17 * Several Surprises: 3.17 to 4.36 * Many Surprises: 4.36 and up.
Luck Spread
Expected
4.11 points
Some Luck
03.9510
Average Finish Error
Expected
1.67
Pinpoint
02.646
Biggest Overachiever
Expected 95.83%
99.00%
Rosenborg
50100
Biggest Underachiever
Expected 4.17%
2.00%
Eik Tonsberg
050
Season Outliers
Expected
2 of 12
Minimal Outliers
01.26
Unexpected Relegations
Expected
1 of 3
As Expected
02.03

Parity

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Gini Index
How evenly points were spread across the league. Lower means a tight, balanced table; higher means a few teams ran off with most of the points.
Balanced: under 0.14 * Even: 0.14 to 0.16 * Top-Heavy: 0.16 to 0.19 * Lopsided: 0.19 and up.
Noll-Scully
Take a league where every match is a coin flip and nobody is better than anybody. You would still get a table, with a leader and a bottom club, purely by luck, and you can work out how far apart that table would be. This is the real table measured against it. At 1.00 the season was no more spread out than pure chance; at 2.00 it was twice as spread out, which takes genuine differences in quality. Dividing by the luck figure is what makes seasons of different lengths comparable, because a short season spreads a table by luck alone far more than a long one does. Elo SD in the corner is the same question in rating points: how far apart the teams finished on the ratings.
Coin-Flip Parity: under 1.35 * Moderate Separation: 1.35 to 1.55 * Strong Separation: 1.55 to 1.75 * Wide Separation: 1.75 and up.
Interquartile Edge
Chance the team at the 75th percentile of Elo would beat the team at the 25th percentile on a neutral field. Higher means a bigger gap between the upper and lower half of the table.
Even: under 61.5% * Slight Edge: 61.5% to 65% * Clear Edge: 65% to 69.5% * Wide Edge: 69.5% and up.
Best vs. Worst
Chance the top-rated team would beat the bottom-rated team on a neutral field. The gold line is how large that gap tends to be in a league of this size; a dot to the right flags an unusually dominant or unusually weak team.
Even: under 82% * Clear Edge: 82% to 87.5% * Strong Edge: 87.5% to 92.5% * Dominant: 92.5% and up.
Close Games
Share of matches decided by 1 goal or fewer, draws included. The gold line is how many close games the matchups and the scoring value of an Elo point predict.
Few: under 53.5% * Some Drama: 53.5% to 58% * Frequent: 58% to 62% * Very Frequent: 62% and up.
Blowouts
Share of matches decided by 3 goals or more. The gold line is how many routs the matchups and the scoring model predict.
Rare: under 16% * Occasional: 16% to 19% * Frequent: 19% to 25% * Very Frequent: 25% and up.
Gini Index
0.14
Even
00.140.5
Noll-Scully
Elo SD: 90.11
1.56
Strong Separation
0.91.351.551.752.5
Interquartile Edge
65%
Clear Edge
50%61.5%69.5%100%
Best vs. Worst
Baseline
87%
Clear Edge
50%86%100%
Close Games
Expected
59%
Frequent
0%48%100%
Blowouts
Expected
24%
Frequent
0%28%100%

Predictability

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Brier Score
How close the pregame probabilities landed to the actual result, averaged over the season. Confident, correct calls are rewarded most; confident misses are punished most. Lower is better; since draws are possible, a score under 0.66 beats guessing the base rate.
Highly Predictable: under 0.56 * Predictable: 0.56 to 0.62 * Hard to Predict: 0.62 to 0.66 * Coin-Flip: 0.66 and up.
Matchup Imbalance
How lopsided the matchups were on paper, averaging the gap between the two win probabilities over their sum. 0 means every match was a toss-up; 1 means every match was a heavy favorite against a big underdog.
Very Even: under 0.32 * Slight Separation: 0.32 to 0.34 * Notable Separation: 0.34 to 0.38 * Lopsided: 0.38 and up.
Strangeness
How wild the final table was versus what the model expected. A value of 1 means teams landed about one standard deviation from their projections on average. Above 1 is a stranger season; below 1 hugged the projections.
Very Predictable: under 0.8 * As Expected: 0.8 to 1.1 * Wilder Than Modeled: 1.1 to 1.4 * Chaotic: 1.4 and up.
Repeatability
How closely the final table order matched the preseason Elo order, by Spearman rank correlation. Higher means last season's ratings strongly predicted this season's finish. Shows N/A for an inaugural season.
Weak Carryover: under 0.28 * Some Carryover: 0.28 to 0.48 * Strong Carryover: 0.48 to 0.59 * Near-Lock: 0.59 and up.
Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won. The gold line is how often the model expected underdogs to win; a dot to the right means upsets ran hotter than expected.
Chalky: under 23.5% * As Expected: 23.5% to 25.5% * Upset-Prone: 25.5% to 27.5% * Very Upset-Prone: 27.5% and up.
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Share of matches the underdog won, counting only games with a clear favorite (at least 60% likely to win once a draw is set aside). The gold line is how often the model expected these favorites to slip.
Solid Favorites: under 19% * As Expected: 19% to 22% * Shaky Favorites: 22% to 25% * Very Shaky: 25% and up.
Brier Score
Expected
0.61
Predictable
00.602
Matchup Imbalance
0.37
Notable Separation
00.320.380.5
Strangeness
Expected
0.96
As Expected
01.002
Repeatability
0.42
Some Carryover
00.280.481
Upset Rate
Expected
27%
Upset-Prone
0%24%50%
Clear Favorite Upset Rate
Expected
23%
Shaky Favorites
0%21%50%

Calibration

How these are measured

The navy dot is the actual value, the gold line and key are the model's reference where one applies, and the slate ticks are the cutoffs between read labels listed under each metric.

Probability calibration
An all-in-one chi-square test of the model's probabilities. Matches are grouped by how confident the model was, and within each group the predicted and actual counts of home wins, draws, and away wins are compared. The p-value is plotted; above 0.05 means well-calibrated.
Miscalibrated: under 0.05 * Borderline: 0.05 to 0.1 * Well Calibrated: 0.1 to 0.5 * Excellent: 0.5 and up.
Calibration slope
Checks whether the spread of the probabilities is right. Each probability is turned into log-odds and a line is fit predicting the actual results. A slope of 1.00 is perfect; below 1 is overconfidence (favorites lost more than their odds implied); above 1 is under-confidence.
Overconfident: under 0.85 * Calibrated: 0.85 to 1.15 * Underconfident: 1.15 to 1.3 * Very Underconfident: 1.3 and up.
Calibration error (ECE)
The average gap between the model's stated chances and how often the predicted result actually happened. Smaller is better. The gold line is the noise ceiling, the error luck alone can produce even with perfect probabilities; below it, the model's error is no larger than chance.
Well Within Noise: under 0.14 * Near Noise Ceiling: 0.14 to 0.21 * Above Noise: 0.21 to 0.28 * Well Above Noise: 0.28 and up.
Probability calibration
0.92
Excellent
0.010.050.10.51
Calibration slope
Ideal
1.05
Calibrated
0.51.001.5
Calibration error (ECE)
Noise ceiling
0.054
Well Within Noise
00.1390.4

Final Table Odds

Each cell is the probability — across 100,000 simulations — that the team (row) finished at that position (column). Rows are sorted by actual finish (champion at top, bottom of the table at the bottom).

Team123456789101112
Rosenborg24.00%12.00%16.00%11.00%10.00%9.00%1.00%4.00%3.00%4.00%6.00%—
Lillestrom36.00%24.00%9.00%13.00%10.00%3.00%1.00%3.00%1.00%———
Valerenga12.00%17.00%22.00%15.00%9.00%7.00%9.00%5.00%2.00%1.00%1.00%—
Kongsvinger6.00%10.00%5.00%10.00%9.00%6.00%9.00%11.00%8.00%13.00%8.00%5.00%
Mjondalen2.00%2.00%7.00%6.00%15.00%9.00%11.00%6.00%13.00%10.00%12.00%7.00%
Start2.00%3.00%7.00%7.00%4.00%10.00%10.00%19.00%11.00%11.00%9.00%7.00%
Viking8.00%6.00%6.00%7.00%10.00%9.00%9.00%9.00%12.00%8.00%10.00%6.00%
Molde—3.00%8.00%6.00%8.00%11.00%7.00%6.00%15.00%13.00%8.00%15.00%
Bryne6.00%15.00%11.00%9.00%9.00%10.00%15.00%8.00%8.00%2.00%6.00%1.00%
Moss3.00%4.00%5.00%4.00%6.00%12.00%8.00%14.00%8.00%14.00%13.00%9.00%
Brann1.00%—3.00%9.00%7.00%8.00%17.00%11.00%12.00%12.00%11.00%9.00%
Eik Tonsberg—4.00%1.00%3.00%3.00%6.00%3.00%4.00%7.00%12.00%16.00%41.00%

Points Required Per Position

The empirical CDF of simulated point totals per finishing position. Each curve shows, for one position (1st, 2nd, ..., last), the spread of point totals teams accumulated across simulations. Reading the curve at the 50% mark gives the median points typically needed to finish at that position. Steep curves mean the position is tightly clustered around a particular point range; shallow curves mean the position came with a wide variety of point totals.

Next-Season Status

Across 100,000 regular-season simulations, the probability of each team's next-season status. Columns appear in best-to-worst outcome order: promotion-positive on the left, relegation-positive on the right. Cells with darker shading indicate higher likelihood.

Team Same level Qualified for relegation playoff Direct relegation
Lillestrom 100% — —
Valerenga 98.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Rosenborg 90.00% 4.00% 6.00%
Bryne 91.00% 2.00% 7.00%
Kongsvinger 74.00% 13.00% 13.00%
Start 73.00% 11.00% 16.00%
Viking 76.00% 8.00% 16.00%
Mjondalen 71.00% 10.00% 19.00%
Brann 68.00% 12.00% 20.00%
Moss 64.00% 14.00% 22.00%
Molde 64.00% 13.00% 23.00%
Eik Tonsberg 31.00% 12.00% 57.00%

Overall Game Log

Summary of every completed game this season. Sort any column by clicking its header.

Date Opponent ScoreExcitement Pre Elo Opp Elo Win % Tie % Loss %Proj. Margin Elo Δ Points
1985-04-27 Valerenga W 3-036.1 1211 1268 44.63% 24.89% 30.48%+0.12 +22.2 2
1985-04-27 @ Brann L 0-336.1 1268 1211 30.48% 24.89% 44.63%-0.12 -22.2 0
1985-04-27 Lillestrom D 1-152.3 1205 1226 49.18% 24.81% 26.01%+0.39 -1.2 1
1985-04-27 @ Bryne D 1-152.3 1226 1205 26.01% 24.81% 49.18%-0.39 +1.2 1
1985-04-27 Viking W 3-247.5 1231 1221 52.74% 24.67% 22.59%+0.62 +5.7 2
1985-04-27 @ Start L 2-347.5 1221 1231 22.59% 24.67% 52.74%-0.62 -5.7 0
1985-05-01 Kongsvinger D 2-257.6 1203 1206 51.19% 24.74% 24.07%+0.52 -1.1 1
1985-05-01 @ Moss D 2-257.6 1206 1203 24.07% 24.74% 51.19%-0.52 +1.1 1
1985-05-05 Moss D 0-048.3 1205 1202 51.91% 24.71% 23.37%+0.57 -1.7 1
1985-05-05 @ Eik Tonsberg D 0-048.3 1202 1205 23.37% 24.71% 51.91%-0.57 +1.7 2
1985-05-05 Brann D 0-048.3 1207 1233 48.56% 24.83% 26.61%+0.35 -1.3 2
1985-05-05 @ Kongsvinger D 0-048.3 1233 1207 26.61% 24.83% 48.56%-0.35 +1.3 3
1985-05-05 Start W 2-036.0 1227 1237 50.46% 24.77% 24.77%+0.47 +13.0 3
1985-05-05 @ Lillestrom L 0-236.0 1237 1227 24.77% 24.77% 50.46%-0.47 -13.0 2
1985-05-05 Bryne L 1-250.0 1172 1204 47.70% 24.85% 27.45%+0.30 -10.9 0
1985-05-05 @ Mjondalen W 2-150.0 1204 1172 27.45% 24.85% 47.70%-0.30 +10.8 3
1985-05-06 Molde W 2-142.0 1215 1192 54.20% 24.59% 21.21%+0.72 +5.7 2
1985-05-06 @ Viking L 1-242.0 1192 1215 21.21% 24.59% 54.20%-0.72 -5.7 0
1985-05-08 Eik Tonsberg D 0-048.2 1186 1203 49.60% 24.80% 25.60%+0.42 -1.4 1
1985-05-08 @ Molde D 0-048.2 1203 1186 25.60% 24.80% 49.60%-0.42 +1.4 2
1985-05-08 Mjondalen W 3-139.1 1213 1161 57.15% 24.38% 18.47%+0.94 +8.8 2
1985-05-08 @ Rosenborg L 1-339.1 1161 1213 18.47% 24.38% 57.15%-0.94 -8.8 0
1985-05-12 Valerenga D 1-152.4 1215 1245 47.97% 24.84% 27.18%+0.31 -1.1 4
1985-05-12 @ Bryne D 1-152.4 1245 1215 27.18% 24.84% 47.97%-0.31 +1.1 1
1985-05-12 Kongsvinger L 0-146.2 1204 1206 51.38% 24.73% 23.88%+0.53 -12.3 2
1985-05-12 @ Eik Tonsberg W 1-046.2 1206 1204 23.88% 24.73% 51.38%-0.53 +12.3 4
1985-05-12 Lillestrom L 1-347.2 1184 1240 44.77% 24.89% 30.33%+0.12 -17.8 1
1985-05-12 @ Molde W 3-147.2 1240 1184 30.33% 24.89% 44.77%-0.12 +17.8 5
1985-05-12 Viking D 1-152.3 1203 1221 49.54% 24.80% 25.66%+0.41 -1.2 3
1985-05-12 @ Moss D 1-152.3 1221 1203 25.66% 24.80% 49.54%-0.41 +1.2 3
1985-05-12 Mjondalen L 0-344.3 1224 1152 58.98% 24.20% 16.81%+1.09 -38.4 2
1985-05-12 @ Start W 3-044.3 1152 1224 16.81% 24.20% 58.98%-1.09 +38.4 2
1985-05-13 Brann W 4-033.6 1222 1234 50.18% 24.78% 25.04%+0.45 +24.8 4
1985-05-13 @ Rosenborg L 0-433.6 1234 1222 25.04% 24.78% 50.18%-0.45 -24.8 3
1985-05-16 Start L 1-447.9 1210 1186 54.22% 24.59% 21.19%+0.72 -29.8 3
1985-05-16 @ Brann W 4-147.9 1186 1210 21.19% 24.59% 54.22%-0.72 +29.9 4
1985-05-16 Eik Tonsberg W 8-032.1 1258 1192 58.41% 24.26% 17.33%+1.04 +35.1 7
1985-05-16 @ Lillestrom L 0-832.1 1192 1258 17.33% 24.26% 58.41%-1.04 -35.1 2
1985-05-16 Moss L 0-145.9 1190 1202 50.21% 24.78% 25.02%+0.45 -12.0 2
1985-05-16 @ Mjondalen W 1-045.9 1202 1190 25.02% 24.78% 50.21%-0.45 +12.0 5
1985-05-16 Bryne W 3-139.9 1247 1214 55.18% 24.53% 20.29%+0.79 +9.5 6
1985-05-16 @ Rosenborg L 1-339.9 1214 1247 20.29% 24.53% 55.18%-0.79 -9.5 4
1985-05-16 Molde L 0-246.2 1247 1167 59.69% 24.13% 16.19%+1.15 -26.7 1
1985-05-16 @ Valerenga W 2-046.2 1167 1247 16.19% 24.13% 59.69%-1.15 +26.7 3
1985-05-16 Kongsvinger W 3-033.8 1222 1218 52.02% 24.71% 23.27%+0.57 +17.9 5
1985-05-16 @ Viking L 0-333.8 1218 1222 23.27% 24.71% 52.02%-0.57 -17.9 4
1985-05-19 Brann L 0-147.0 1204 1180 54.31% 24.58% 21.11%+0.73 -12.9 4
1985-05-19 @ Bryne W 1-047.0 1180 1204 21.11% 24.58% 54.31%-0.73 +13.0 5
1985-05-19 Viking W 4-036.2 1157 1240 41.07% 24.90% 34.03%-0.08 +31.5 4
1985-05-19 @ Eik Tonsberg L 0-436.2 1240 1157 34.03% 24.90% 41.07%+0.08 -31.5 5
1985-05-19 Rosenborg W 2-037.7 1201 1256 44.73% 24.89% 30.37%+0.12 +15.2 6
1985-05-19 @ Kongsvinger L 0-237.7 1256 1201 30.37% 24.89% 44.73%-0.12 -15.2 6
1985-05-19 Mjondalen W 3-247.2 1193 1178 53.28% 24.64% 22.07%+0.66 +5.6 5
1985-05-19 @ Molde L 2-347.2 1178 1193 22.07% 24.64% 53.28%-0.66 -5.6 2
1985-05-19 Lillestrom L 0-241.3 1214 1293 41.68% 24.90% 33.42%-0.05 -19.4 5
1985-05-19 @ Moss W 2-041.3 1293 1214 33.42% 24.90% 41.68%+0.05 +19.4 9
1985-05-19 Valerenga L 0-742.0 1215 1220 51.09% 24.75% 24.16%+0.51 -74.2 4
1985-05-19 @ Start W 7-042.0 1220 1215 24.16% 24.75% 51.09%-0.51 +74.2 3
1985-05-27 Molde D 0-048.2 1193 1199 50.86% 24.75% 24.39%+0.50 -1.6 6
1985-05-27 @ Brann D 0-048.2 1199 1193 24.39% 24.75% 50.86%-0.50 +1.6 6
1985-05-27 Bryne L 2-356.8 1216 1191 54.26% 24.59% 21.15%+0.73 -11.6 6
1985-05-27 @ Kongsvinger W 3-256.8 1191 1216 21.15% 24.59% 54.26%-0.73 +11.6 6
1985-05-27 Viking D 2-258.1 1312 1209 61.74% 23.87% 14.39%+1.33 -2.0 10
1985-05-27 @ Lillestrom D 2-258.1 1209 1312 14.39% 23.87% 61.74%-1.33 +2.0 6
1985-05-27 Eik Tonsberg W 2-143.3 1173 1188 49.75% 24.79% 25.46%+0.42 +6.6 4
1985-05-27 @ Mjondalen L 1-243.3 1188 1173 25.46% 24.79% 49.75%-0.42 -6.6 4
1985-05-27 Start W 1-034.9 1241 1141 61.42% 23.91% 14.67%+1.30 +4.4 8
1985-05-27 @ Rosenborg L 0-134.9 1141 1241 14.67% 23.91% 61.42%-1.30 -4.4 4
1985-05-27 Moss W 5-134.4 1294 1195 61.35% 23.92% 14.73%+1.29 +13.2 5
1985-05-27 @ Valerenga L 1-534.4 1195 1294 14.73% 23.92% 61.35%-1.29 -13.2 5
1985-05-30 Rosenborg D 2-258.1 1307 1246 58.00% 24.30% 17.70%+1.01 -1.7 6
1985-05-30 @ Valerenga D 2-258.1 1246 1307 17.70% 24.30% 58.00%-1.01 +1.6 9
1985-06-02 Kongsvinger D 1-152.9 1310 1204 61.94% 23.84% 14.22%+1.35 -2.7 11
1985-06-02 @ Lillestrom D 1-152.9 1204 1310 14.22% 23.84% 61.94%-1.35 +2.7 7
1985-06-02 Rosenborg L 0-242.4 1201 1247 45.92% 24.88% 29.20%+0.19 -21.0 6
1985-06-02 @ Molde W 2-042.4 1247 1201 29.20% 24.88% 45.92%-0.19 +21.0 11
1985-06-02 Brann L 1-250.8 1182 1191 50.51% 24.77% 24.73%+0.47 -11.4 5
1985-06-02 @ Moss W 2-150.8 1191 1182 24.73% 24.77% 50.51%-0.47 +11.4 8
1985-06-02 Bryne W 3-250.1 1137 1203 43.38% 24.90% 31.72%+0.04 +7.5 6
1985-06-02 @ Start L 2-350.1 1203 1137 31.72% 24.90% 43.38%-0.04 -7.5 6
1985-06-03 Valerenga D 1-152.5 1182 1306 35.38% 24.81% 39.81%-0.39 +0.2 5
1985-06-03 @ Eik Tonsberg D 1-152.5 1306 1182 39.81% 24.81% 35.38%+0.39 -0.2 7
1985-06-03 Mjondalen W 2-034.5 1211 1179 55.01% 24.54% 20.45%+0.78 +11.1 8
1985-06-03 @ Viking L 0-234.5 1179 1211 20.45% 24.54% 55.01%-0.78 -11.1 4
1985-06-09 Molde W 4-032.5 1196 1180 53.38% 24.64% 21.99%+0.67 +22.3 8
1985-06-09 @ Bryne L 0-432.5 1180 1196 21.99% 24.64% 53.38%-0.67 -22.3 6
1985-06-09 Start W 6-031.3 1207 1144 58.10% 24.29% 17.61%+1.02 +27.1 9
1985-06-09 @ Kongsvinger L 0-631.3 1144 1207 17.61% 24.29% 58.10%-1.02 -27.1 6
1985-06-09 Lillestrom L 0-140.9 1168 1308 33.22% 24.75% 42.04%-0.51 -8.6 4
1985-06-09 @ Mjondalen W 1-040.9 1308 1168 42.04% 24.75% 33.22%+0.51 +8.6 13
1985-06-10 Eik Tonsberg W 3-033.2 1202 1182 53.85% 24.61% 21.54%+0.70 +16.8 10
1985-06-10 @ Brann L 0-333.2 1182 1202 21.54% 24.61% 53.85%-0.70 -16.8 5
1985-06-10 Moss W 1-035.1 1268 1170 61.26% 23.93% 14.81%+1.28 +4.4 13
1985-06-10 @ Rosenborg L 0-135.1 1170 1268 14.81% 23.93% 61.26%-1.28 -4.4 5
1985-06-10 Viking D 2-258.1 1305 1222 60.02% 24.09% 15.89%+1.18 -1.8 8
1985-06-10 @ Valerenga D 2-258.1 1222 1305 15.89% 24.09% 60.02%-1.18 +1.8 9
1985-06-16 Rosenborg L 1-443.1 1165 1273 37.66% 24.86% 37.48%-0.27 -22.0 5
1985-06-16 @ Eik Tonsberg W 4-143.1 1273 1165 37.48% 24.86% 37.66%+0.27 +22.0 15
1985-06-16 Valerenga D 1-153.2 1316 1303 53.03% 24.66% 22.31%+0.64 -1.6 14
1985-06-16 @ Lillestrom D 1-153.2 1303 1316 22.31% 24.66% 53.03%-0.64 +1.6 9
1985-06-16 Kongsvinger W 5-139.9 1160 1234 42.27% 24.90% 32.83%-0.02 +25.5 6
1985-06-16 @ Mjondalen L 1-539.9 1234 1160 32.83% 24.90% 42.27%+0.02 -25.5 9
1985-06-16 Start D 1-152.2 1157 1117 55.89% 24.48% 19.63%+0.85 -2.0 7
1985-06-16 @ Molde D 1-152.2 1117 1157 19.63% 24.48% 55.89%-0.85 +2.0 7
1985-06-16 Bryne D 1-152.2 1166 1218 45.24% 24.89% 29.87%+0.15 -0.8 6
1985-06-16 @ Moss D 1-152.2 1218 1166 29.87% 24.89% 45.24%-0.15 +0.8 9
1985-06-17 Brann W 1-037.8 1223 1219 52.07% 24.70% 23.23%+0.58 +6.5 11
1985-06-17 @ Viking L 0-137.8 1219 1223 23.23% 24.70% 52.07%-0.58 -6.5 10
1985-06-22 Kongsvinger W 1-039.8 1155 1208 45.10% 24.89% 30.01%+0.14 +8.0 9
1985-06-22 @ Molde L 0-139.8 1208 1155 30.01% 24.89% 45.10%-0.14 -8.0 9
1985-06-23 Eik Tonsberg W 6-031.0 1219 1143 59.28% 24.17% 16.55%+1.11 +25.6 11
1985-06-23 @ Bryne L 0-631.0 1143 1219 16.55% 24.17% 59.28%-1.11 -25.6 5
1985-06-23 Viking L 1-253.4 1295 1230 58.30% 24.27% 17.43%+1.03 -13.1 15
1985-06-23 @ Rosenborg W 2-153.4 1230 1295 17.43% 24.27% 58.30%-1.03 +13.1 13
1985-06-23 Mjondalen W 2-139.6 1305 1185 63.04% 23.68% 13.28%+1.45 +3.8 11
1985-06-23 @ Valerenga L 1-239.6 1185 1305 13.28% 23.68% 63.04%-1.45 -3.8 6
1985-06-24 Lillestrom L 0-142.7 1213 1315 38.45% 24.87% 36.68%-0.23 -9.7 10
1985-06-24 @ Brann W 1-042.7 1315 1213 36.68% 24.87% 38.45%+0.23 +9.6 16
1985-06-24 Moss W 3-035.4 1119 1165 46.04% 24.88% 29.08%+0.20 +21.4 9
1985-06-24 @ Start L 0-335.4 1165 1119 29.08% 24.88% 46.04%-0.20 -21.4 6
1985-06-30 Rosenborg W 3-033.3 1324 1282 56.17% 24.46% 19.38%+0.87 +15.4 18
1985-06-30 @ Lillestrom L 0-333.3 1282 1324 19.38% 24.46% 56.17%-0.87 -15.4 15
1985-06-30 Brann D 3-361.5 1181 1203 49.03% 24.82% 26.15%+0.38 -0.7 7
1985-06-30 @ Mjondalen D 3-361.5 1203 1181 26.15% 24.82% 49.03%-0.38 +0.7 11
1985-06-30 Molde W 6-239.8 1144 1163 49.30% 24.81% 25.90%+0.40 +18.0 8
1985-06-30 @ Moss L 2-639.8 1163 1144 25.90% 24.81% 49.30%-0.40 -18.0 9
1985-07-03 Start L 0-341.3 1118 1141 48.89% 24.82% 26.29%+0.37 -32.2 5
1985-07-03 @ Eik Tonsberg W 3-041.3 1141 1118 26.29% 24.82% 48.89%-0.37 +32.2 11
1985-07-03 Valerenga W 2-147.3 1200 1309 37.52% 24.86% 37.62%-0.27 +9.0 11
1985-07-03 @ Kongsvinger L 1-247.3 1309 1200 37.62% 24.86% 37.52%+0.27 -9.0 11
1985-07-03 Bryne D 1-152.5 1243 1244 51.45% 24.73% 23.82%+0.53 -1.5 14
1985-07-03 @ Viking D 1-152.5 1244 1243 23.82% 24.73% 51.45%-0.53 +1.5 12
1985-08-04 Molde D 1-152.1 1085 1145 44.22% 24.90% 30.88%+0.09 -0.7 6
1985-08-04 @ Eik Tonsberg D 1-152.1 1145 1085 30.88% 24.90% 44.22%-0.09 +0.7 10
1985-08-04 Moss L 2-357.5 1209 1162 56.66% 24.42% 18.92%+0.90 -12.1 11
1985-08-04 @ Kongsvinger W 3-257.5 1162 1209 18.92% 24.42% 56.66%-0.90 +12.0 10
1985-08-04 Bryne D 1-153.2 1340 1246 60.91% 23.98% 15.11%+1.25 -2.6 19
1985-08-04 @ Lillestrom D 1-153.2 1246 1340 15.11% 23.98% 60.91%-1.25 +2.6 13
1985-08-04 Rosenborg D 1-152.3 1181 1266 40.72% 24.90% 34.39%-0.10 -0.3 8
1985-08-04 @ Mjondalen D 1-152.3 1266 1181 34.39% 24.90% 40.72%+0.10 +0.3 16
1985-08-07 Brann W 6-030.7 1300 1204 61.10% 23.96% 14.95%+1.27 +23.4 13
1985-08-07 @ Valerenga L 0-630.7 1204 1300 14.95% 23.96% 61.10%-1.27 -23.4 11
1985-08-07 Start D 1-152.5 1242 1173 58.68% 24.23% 17.09%+1.06 -2.3 15
1985-08-07 @ Viking D 1-152.5 1173 1242 17.09% 24.23% 58.68%-1.06 +2.3 12
1985-08-11 Kongsvinger L 0-145.7 1180 1197 49.62% 24.80% 25.58%+0.42 -11.9 11
1985-08-11 @ Brann W 1-045.7 1197 1180 25.58% 24.80% 49.62%-0.42 +11.9 13
1985-08-11 Mjondalen D 1-152.5 1248 1180 58.62% 24.24% 17.15%+1.06 -2.3 14
1985-08-11 @ Bryne D 1-152.5 1180 1248 17.15% 24.24% 58.62%-1.06 +2.3 9
1985-08-11 Viking W 3-037.4 1146 1239 39.65% 24.89% 35.46%-0.16 +24.9 12
1985-08-11 @ Molde L 0-337.4 1239 1146 35.46% 24.89% 39.65%+0.16 -24.9 15
1985-08-11 Eik Tonsberg W 2-032.8 1174 1085 60.48% 24.03% 15.48%+1.22 +8.7 12
1985-08-11 @ Moss L 0-232.8 1085 1174 15.48% 24.03% 60.48%-1.22 -8.7 6
1985-08-11 Valerenga L 1-249.8 1267 1323 44.62% 24.89% 30.48%+0.12 -10.3 16
1985-08-11 @ Rosenborg W 2-149.8 1323 1267 30.48% 24.89% 44.62%-0.12 +10.3 15
1985-08-11 Lillestrom L 0-237.8 1175 1337 30.28% 24.63% 45.09%-0.68 -15.1 12
1985-08-11 @ Start W 2-037.8 1337 1175 45.09% 24.63% 30.28%+0.68 +15.1 21
1985-08-18 Eik Tonsberg W 3-137.0 1209 1076 64.04% 23.51% 12.45%+1.55 +6.2 15
1985-08-18 @ Kongsvinger L 1-337.0 1076 1209 12.45% 23.51% 64.04%-1.55 -6.2 6
1985-08-18 Molde D 0-049.2 1352 1171 67.40% 22.82% 9.78%+1.91 -3.7 22
1985-08-18 @ Lillestrom D 0-049.2 1171 1352 9.78% 22.82% 67.40%-1.91 +3.7 13
1985-08-18 Start W 4-138.0 1183 1160 54.08% 24.60% 21.33%+0.71 +14.0 11
1985-08-18 @ Mjondalen L 1-438.0 1160 1183 21.33% 24.60% 54.08%-0.71 -14.0 12
1985-08-18 Moss W 2-141.8 1214 1182 55.07% 24.53% 20.39%+0.79 +5.5 17
1985-08-18 @ Viking L 1-241.8 1182 1214 20.39% 24.53% 55.07%-0.79 -5.5 12
1985-08-19 Rosenborg L 0-143.0 1168 1256 40.42% 24.89% 34.68%-0.12 -10.0 11
1985-08-19 @ Brann W 1-043.0 1256 1168 34.68% 24.89% 40.42%+0.12 +10.0 18
1985-08-19 Bryne W 4-242.8 1334 1246 60.37% 24.05% 15.59%+1.21 +6.8 17
1985-08-19 @ Valerenga L 2-442.8 1246 1334 15.59% 24.05% 60.37%-1.21 -6.8 14
1985-08-25 Rosenborg L 1-250.5 1239 1266 48.38% 24.83% 26.79%+0.34 -11.0 14
1985-08-25 @ Bryne W 2-150.5 1266 1239 26.79% 24.83% 48.38%-0.34 +11.0 20
1985-08-25 Lillestrom L 0-135.8 1070 1349 17.94% 23.49% 58.57%-1.56 -5.2 6
1985-08-25 @ Eik Tonsberg W 1-035.8 1349 1070 58.57% 23.49% 17.94%+1.56 +5.2 24
1985-08-25 Viking W 3-141.0 1215 1220 51.07% 24.75% 24.19%+0.51 +11.0 17
1985-08-25 @ Kongsvinger L 1-341.0 1220 1215 24.19% 24.75% 51.07%-0.51 -11.0 17
1985-08-25 Valerenga W 2-042.4 1175 1340 29.80% 24.60% 45.60%-0.71 +20.8 15
1985-08-25 @ Molde L 0-242.4 1340 1175 45.60% 24.60% 29.80%+0.71 -20.8 17
1985-08-25 Mjondalen L 0-243.2 1177 1197 49.29% 24.81% 25.90%+0.40 -22.4 12
1985-08-25 @ Moss W 2-043.2 1197 1177 25.90% 24.81% 49.29%-0.40 +22.4 13
1985-08-25 Brann W 3-248.0 1146 1158 50.14% 24.78% 25.08%+0.45 +6.2 14
1985-08-25 @ Start L 2-348.0 1158 1146 25.08% 24.78% 50.14%-0.45 -6.2 11
1985-08-28 Bryne W 2-145.6 1152 1228 42.05% 24.90% 33.05%-0.03 +8.1 13
1985-08-28 @ Brann L 1-245.6 1228 1152 33.05% 24.90% 42.05%+0.03 -8.1 14
1985-08-28 Moss L 0-248.6 1354 1155 68.50% 22.54% 8.96%+2.05 -30.6 24
1985-08-28 @ Lillestrom W 2-048.6 1155 1354 8.96% 22.54% 68.50%-2.05 +30.6 14
1985-08-28 Molde D 0-048.3 1219 1195 54.18% 24.59% 21.22%+0.72 -2.0 14
1985-08-28 @ Mjondalen D 0-048.3 1195 1219 21.22% 24.59% 54.18%-0.72 +2.0 16
1985-08-28 Kongsvinger D 1-152.7 1277 1226 56.98% 24.39% 18.63%+0.93 -2.1 21
1985-08-28 @ Rosenborg D 1-152.7 1226 1277 18.63% 24.39% 56.98%-0.93 +2.1 18
1985-08-28 Eik Tonsberg W 4-029.0 1209 1065 64.86% 23.36% 11.78%+1.63 +12.9 19
1985-08-28 @ Viking L 0-429.0 1065 1209 11.78% 23.36% 64.86%-1.63 -12.9 6
1985-08-29 Start W 4-346.4 1320 1152 66.47% 23.03% 10.50%+1.81 +2.8 19
1985-08-29 @ Valerenga L 3-446.4 1152 1320 10.50% 23.03% 66.47%-1.81 -2.8 14
1985-09-01 Kongsvinger D 1-152.4 1220 1229 50.62% 24.76% 24.61%+0.48 -1.4 15
1985-09-01 @ Bryne D 1-152.4 1229 1220 24.61% 24.76% 50.62%-0.48 +1.4 19
1985-09-01 Brann W 2-141.5 1197 1160 55.59% 24.50% 19.91%+0.82 +5.4 18
1985-09-01 @ Molde L 1-241.5 1160 1197 19.91% 24.50% 55.59%-0.82 -5.4 13
1985-09-01 Valerenga W 3-253.4 1185 1322 33.53% 24.76% 41.72%-0.49 +9.2 16
1985-09-01 @ Moss L 2-353.4 1322 1185 41.72% 24.76% 33.53%+0.49 -9.2 19
1985-09-01 Rosenborg L 1-246.3 1149 1275 35.07% 24.80% 40.12%-0.41 -8.5 14
1985-09-01 @ Start W 2-146.3 1275 1149 40.12% 24.80% 35.07%+0.41 +8.5 23
1985-09-02 Mjondalen L 1-244.5 1052 1217 29.90% 24.61% 45.50%-0.70 -7.5 6
1985-09-02 @ Eik Tonsberg W 2-144.5 1217 1052 45.50% 24.61% 29.90%+0.70 +7.5 16
1985-09-02 Lillestrom L 0-338.8 1222 1323 38.53% 24.87% 36.59%-0.22 -26.5 19
1985-09-02 @ Viking W 3-038.8 1323 1222 36.59% 24.87% 38.53%+0.22 +26.5 26
1985-09-08 Moss W 1-039.2 1155 1194 46.86% 24.87% 28.28%+0.25 +7.6 15
1985-09-08 @ Brann L 0-139.2 1194 1155 28.28% 24.87% 46.86%-0.25 -7.6 16
1985-09-08 Start D 0-048.4 1219 1141 59.51% 24.15% 16.35%+1.13 -2.7 16
1985-09-08 @ Bryne D 0-048.4 1141 1219 16.35% 24.15% 59.51%-1.13 +2.7 15
1985-09-08 Lillestrom D 0-048.8 1230 1350 35.93% 24.82% 39.25%-0.36 +0.2 20
1985-09-08 @ Kongsvinger D 0-048.8 1350 1230 39.25% 24.82% 35.93%+0.36 -0.2 27
1985-09-08 Viking W 3-033.0 1224 1195 54.77% 24.55% 20.68%+0.76 +16.2 18
1985-09-08 @ Mjondalen L 0-333.0 1195 1224 20.68% 24.55% 54.77%-0.76 -16.2 19
1985-09-08 Molde W 4-136.5 1284 1203 59.79% 24.11% 16.10%+1.16 +11.0 25
1985-09-08 @ Rosenborg L 1-436.5 1203 1284 16.10% 24.11% 59.79%-1.16 -11.0 18
1985-09-08 Eik Tonsberg W 3-134.5 1313 1044 72.37% 21.30% 6.33%+2.57 +3.2 21
1985-09-08 @ Valerenga L 1-334.5 1044 1313 6.33% 21.30% 72.37%-2.57 -3.2 6
1985-09-15 Brann L 1-246.3 1041 1163 35.70% 24.82% 39.48%-0.37 -8.6 6
1985-09-15 @ Eik Tonsberg W 2-146.3 1163 1041 39.48% 24.82% 35.70%+0.37 +8.6 17
1985-09-15 Mjondalen W 6-133.5 1349 1241 62.15% 23.81% 14.04%+1.37 +15.4 29
1985-09-15 @ Lillestrom L 1-633.5 1241 1349 14.04% 23.81% 62.15%-1.37 -15.4 18
1985-09-15 Bryne W 2-143.7 1192 1216 48.72% 24.82% 26.46%+0.36 +6.8 20
1985-09-15 @ Molde L 1-243.7 1216 1192 26.46% 24.82% 48.72%-0.36 -6.8 16
1985-09-15 Rosenborg L 2-352.1 1187 1295 37.57% 24.86% 37.57%-0.27 -8.5 16
1985-09-15 @ Moss W 3-252.1 1295 1187 37.57% 24.86% 37.57%+0.27 +8.5 27
1985-09-15 Kongsvinger W 5-140.4 1144 1230 40.61% 24.90% 34.49%-0.11 +26.5 17
1985-09-15 @ Start L 1-540.4 1230 1144 34.49% 24.90% 40.61%+0.11 -26.5 20
1985-09-15 Valerenga W 1-043.5 1179 1316 33.52% 24.76% 41.72%-0.49 +10.3 21
1985-09-15 @ Viking L 0-143.5 1316 1179 41.72% 24.76% 33.52%+0.49 -10.3 21
1985-09-29 Viking W 4-139.4 1171 1189 49.46% 24.80% 25.74%+0.41 +16.4 19
1985-09-29 @ Brann L 1-439.4 1189 1171 25.74% 24.80% 49.46%-0.41 -16.4 21
1985-09-29 Moss W 2-141.8 1209 1178 54.97% 24.54% 20.48%+0.78 +5.5 18
1985-09-29 @ Bryne L 1-241.8 1178 1209 20.48% 24.54% 54.97%-0.78 -5.5 16
1985-09-29 Mjondalen L 0-540.7 1204 1225 49.05% 24.82% 26.14%+0.38 -52.0 20
1985-09-29 @ Kongsvinger W 5-040.7 1225 1204 26.14% 24.82% 49.05%-0.38 +52.0 20
1985-09-29 Eik Tonsberg W 5-130.8 1303 1033 72.46% 21.26% 6.27%+2.59 +5.7 29
1985-09-29 @ Rosenborg L 1-530.8 1033 1303 6.27% 21.26% 72.46%-2.59 -5.7 6
1985-09-29 Molde W 3-141.8 1170 1199 48.22% 24.84% 26.95%+0.33 +12.0 19
1985-09-29 @ Start L 1-341.8 1199 1170 26.95% 24.84% 48.22%-0.33 -12.0 20
1985-09-29 Lillestrom D 0-049.6 1306 1365 44.35% 24.90% 30.75%+0.10 -0.8 22
1985-09-29 @ Valerenga D 0-049.6 1365 1306 30.75% 24.90% 44.35%-0.10 +0.8 30
1985-10-06 Bryne W 1-045.1 1027 1215 27.11% 24.45% 48.45%-0.87 +11.6 8
1985-10-06 @ Eik Tonsberg L 0-145.1 1215 1027 48.45% 24.45% 27.11%+0.87 -11.6 18
1985-10-06 Molde W 2-144.0 1152 1187 47.40% 24.86% 27.74%+0.28 +7.1 22
1985-10-06 @ Kongsvinger L 1-244.0 1187 1152 27.74% 24.86% 47.40%-0.28 -7.1 20
1985-10-06 Brann W 1-033.7 1366 1188 67.18% 22.87% 9.95%+1.89 +3.1 32
1985-10-06 @ Lillestrom L 0-133.7 1188 1366 9.95% 22.87% 67.18%-1.89 -3.1 19
1985-10-06 Valerenga L 0-145.9 1277 1305 48.26% 24.84% 26.90%+0.33 -11.6 20
1985-10-06 @ Mjondalen W 1-045.9 1305 1277 26.90% 24.84% 48.26%-0.33 +11.6 24
1985-10-06 Start W 1-038.2 1173 1182 50.50% 24.77% 24.73%+0.47 +6.9 18
1985-10-06 @ Moss L 0-138.2 1182 1173 24.73% 24.77% 50.50%-0.47 -6.9 19
1985-10-06 Rosenborg L 0-141.1 1173 1309 33.70% 24.76% 41.54%-0.48 -8.7 21
1985-10-06 @ Viking W 1-041.1 1309 1173 41.54% 24.76% 33.70%+0.48 +8.7 31
1985-10-12 Mjondalen L 1-346.3 1184 1266 41.35% 24.90% 33.75%-0.07 -16.7 19
1985-10-12 @ Brann W 3-146.3 1266 1184 33.75% 24.90% 41.35%+0.07 +16.7 22
1985-10-12 Viking W 2-034.3 1203 1164 55.78% 24.48% 19.74%+0.84 +10.8 20
1985-10-12 @ Bryne L 0-234.3 1164 1203 19.74% 24.48% 55.78%-0.84 -10.8 21
1985-10-12 Moss D 1-152.2 1179 1180 51.58% 24.73% 23.69%+0.54 -1.5 21
1985-10-12 @ Molde D 1-152.2 1180 1179 23.69% 24.73% 51.58%-0.54 +1.5 19
1985-10-12 Eik Tonsberg W 6-132.0 1175 1038 64.31% 23.46% 12.23%+1.58 +13.6 21
1985-10-12 @ Start L 1-632.0 1038 1175 12.23% 23.46% 64.31%-1.58 -13.6 8
1985-10-12 Kongsvinger L 0-247.9 1317 1159 65.86% 23.16% 10.98%+1.74 -29.4 24
1985-10-12 @ Valerenga W 2-047.9 1159 1317 10.98% 23.16% 65.86%-1.74 +29.4 24
1985-10-13 Lillestrom W 1-041.3 1318 1369 45.37% 24.89% 29.74%+0.16 +7.9 33
1985-10-13 @ Rosenborg L 0-141.3 1369 1318 29.74% 24.89% 45.37%-0.16 -7.9 32

Biggest Upsets

The 25 games where the underdog won despite the lowest pregame win probability. Underdog Win % is the winner's pregame chance of winning the game (lower = bigger upset). @ before a team name indicates the away side. An asterisk (*) after the date marks a playoff game.

# Date Underdog Win % Winning Team Losing Team
Team Elo Score Team Elo Score
1 1985-08-28 8.96% Moss 1155 2 @ Lillestrom 1354 0
2 1985-10-12 10.98% Kongsvinger 1159 2 @ Valerenga 1317 0
3 1985-05-16 16.19% Molde 1167 2 @ Valerenga 1247 0
4 1985-05-12 16.81% Mjondalen 1152 3 @ Start 1224 0
5 1985-06-23 17.43% Viking 1230 2 @ Rosenborg 1295 1
6 1985-08-04 18.92% Moss 1162 3 @ Kongsvinger 1209 2
7 1985-05-19 21.11% Brann 1180 1 @ Bryne 1204 0
8 1985-05-27 21.15% Bryne 1191 3 @ Kongsvinger 1216 2
9 1985-05-16 21.19% Start 1186 4 @ Brann 1210 1
10 1985-05-12 23.88% Kongsvinger 1206 1 @ Eik Tonsberg 1204 0
11 1985-05-19 24.16% Valerenga 1220 7 @ Start 1215 0
12 1985-06-02 24.73% Brann 1191 2 @ Moss 1182 1
13 1985-05-16 25.02% Moss 1202 1 @ Mjondalen 1190 0
14 1985-08-11 25.58% Kongsvinger 1197 1 @ Brann 1180 0
15 1985-08-25 25.90% Mjondalen 1197 2 @ Moss 1177 0
16 1985-09-29 26.14% Mjondalen 1225 5 @ Kongsvinger 1204 0
17 1985-07-03 26.29% Start 1141 3 @ Eik Tonsberg 1118 0
18 1985-08-25 26.79% Rosenborg 1266 2 @ Bryne 1239 1
19 1985-10-06 26.90% Valerenga 1305 1 @ Mjondalen 1277 0
20 1985-10-06 27.11% @ Eik Tonsberg 1027 1 Bryne 1215 0
21 1985-05-05 27.45% Bryne 1204 2 @ Mjondalen 1172 1
22 1985-06-02 29.20% Rosenborg 1247 2 @ Molde 1201 0
23 1985-08-25 29.80% @ Molde 1175 2 Valerenga 1340 0
24 1985-05-12 30.33% Lillestrom 1240 3 @ Molde 1184 1
25 1985-08-11 30.48% Valerenga 1323 2 @ Rosenborg 1267 1

Biggest Elo Changes

The 25 games that resulted in the largest shift in Elo rating.

# Date Elo Δ Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1985-05-19 74.19 Valerenga 7 1220 24.16% @ Start 0 1215 51.09% 24.75%
2 1985-09-29 52.03 Mjondalen 5 1225 26.14% @ Kongsvinger 0 1204 49.05% 24.82%
3 1985-05-12 38.36 Mjondalen 3 1152 16.81% @ Start 0 1224 58.98% 24.20%
4 1985-05-16 35.09 @ Lillestrom 8 1258 58.41% Eik Tonsberg 0 1192 17.33% 24.26%
5 1985-07-03 32.22 Start 3 1141 26.29% @ Eik Tonsberg 0 1118 48.89% 24.82%
6 1985-05-19 31.51 @ Eik Tonsberg 4 1157 41.07% Viking 0 1240 34.03% 24.90%
7 1985-08-28 30.56 Moss 2 1155 8.96% @ Lillestrom 0 1354 68.50% 22.54%
8 1985-05-16 29.85 Start 4 1186 21.19% @ Brann 1 1210 54.22% 24.59%
9 1985-10-12 29.43 Kongsvinger 2 1159 10.98% @ Valerenga 0 1317 65.86% 23.16%
10 1985-06-09 27.07 @ Kongsvinger 6 1207 58.10% Start 0 1144 17.61% 24.29%
11 1985-05-16 26.72 Molde 2 1167 16.19% @ Valerenga 0 1247 59.69% 24.13%
12 1985-09-15 26.52 @ Start 5 1144 40.61% Kongsvinger 1 1230 34.49% 24.90%
13 1985-09-02 26.49 Lillestrom 3 1323 36.59% @ Viking 0 1222 38.53% 24.87%
14 1985-06-23 25.64 @ Bryne 6 1219 59.28% Eik Tonsberg 0 1143 16.55% 24.17%
15 1985-06-16 25.55 @ Mjondalen 5 1160 42.27% Kongsvinger 1 1234 32.83% 24.90%
16 1985-08-11 24.88 @ Molde 3 1146 39.65% Viking 0 1239 35.46% 24.89%
17 1985-05-13 24.80 @ Rosenborg 4 1222 50.18% Brann 0 1234 25.04% 24.78%
18 1985-08-07 23.43 @ Valerenga 6 1300 61.10% Brann 0 1204 14.95% 23.96%
19 1985-08-25 22.35 Mjondalen 2 1197 25.90% @ Moss 0 1177 49.29% 24.81%
20 1985-06-09 22.30 @ Bryne 4 1196 53.38% Molde 0 1180 21.99% 24.64%
21 1985-04-27 22.16 @ Brann 3 1211 44.63% Valerenga 0 1268 30.48% 24.89%
22 1985-06-16 21.95 Rosenborg 4 1273 37.48% @ Eik Tonsberg 1 1165 37.66% 24.86%
23 1985-06-24 21.36 @ Start 3 1119 46.04% Moss 0 1165 29.08% 24.88%
24 1985-06-02 21.02 Rosenborg 2 1247 29.20% @ Molde 0 1201 45.92% 24.88%
25 1985-08-25 20.83 @ Molde 2 1175 29.80% Valerenga 0 1340 45.60% 24.60%

Most & Least Exciting Games

The season’s games ranked by excitement rating (0–100) — a blend of closeness, upset, team quality, and scoring. An asterisk (*) after the date indicates a playoff game.

# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1985-06-30 61.5 @ Mjondalen 3 1181 49.03% Brann 3 1203 26.15% 24.82%
2 1985-05-27 58.1 @ Lillestrom 2 1312 61.74% Viking 2 1209 14.39% 23.87%
3 1985-05-30 58.1 @ Valerenga 2 1307 58.00% Rosenborg 2 1246 17.70% 24.30%
4 1985-06-10 58.1 @ Valerenga 2 1305 60.02% Viking 2 1222 15.89% 24.09%
5 1985-05-01 57.6 @ Moss 2 1203 51.19% Kongsvinger 2 1206 24.07% 24.74%
6 1985-08-04 57.5 Moss 3 1162 18.92% @ Kongsvinger 2 1209 56.66% 24.42%
7 1985-05-27 56.8 Bryne 3 1191 21.15% @ Kongsvinger 2 1216 54.26% 24.59%
8 1985-06-23 53.4 Viking 2 1230 17.43% @ Rosenborg 1 1295 58.30% 24.27%
9 1985-09-01 53.4 @ Moss 3 1185 33.53% Valerenga 2 1322 41.72% 24.76%
10 1985-06-16 53.2 @ Lillestrom 1 1316 53.03% Valerenga 1 1303 22.31% 24.66%
11 1985-08-04 53.2 @ Lillestrom 1 1340 60.91% Bryne 1 1246 15.11% 23.98%
12 1985-06-02 52.9 @ Lillestrom 1 1310 61.94% Kongsvinger 1 1204 14.22% 23.84%
13 1985-08-28 52.7 @ Rosenborg 1 1277 56.98% Kongsvinger 1 1226 18.63% 24.39%
14 1985-06-03 52.5 @ Eik Tonsberg 1 1182 35.38% Valerenga 1 1306 39.81% 24.81%
15 1985-07-03 52.5 @ Viking 1 1243 51.45% Bryne 1 1244 23.82% 24.73%
16 1985-08-07 52.5 @ Viking 1 1242 58.68% Start 1 1173 17.09% 24.23%
17 1985-08-11 52.5 @ Bryne 1 1248 58.62% Mjondalen 1 1180 17.15% 24.24%
18 1985-05-12 52.4 @ Bryne 1 1215 47.97% Valerenga 1 1245 27.18% 24.84%
19 1985-09-01 52.4 @ Bryne 1 1220 50.62% Kongsvinger 1 1229 24.61% 24.76%
20 1985-04-27 52.3 @ Bryne 1 1205 49.18% Lillestrom 1 1226 26.01% 24.81%
21 1985-05-12 52.3 @ Moss 1 1203 49.54% Viking 1 1221 25.66% 24.80%
22 1985-08-04 52.3 @ Mjondalen 1 1181 40.72% Rosenborg 1 1266 34.39% 24.90%
23 1985-06-16 52.2 @ Molde 1 1157 55.89% Start 1 1117 19.63% 24.48%
24 1985-06-16 52.2 @ Moss 1 1166 45.24% Bryne 1 1218 29.87% 24.89%
25 1985-10-12 52.2 @ Molde 1 1179 51.58% Moss 1 1180 23.69% 24.73%
# Date Excitement Winning Team Losing Team Tie %
Team Score Elo Win % Team Score Elo Win %
1 1985-08-28 29.0 @ Viking 4 1209 64.86% Eik Tonsberg 0 1065 11.78% 23.36%
2 1985-08-07 30.7 @ Valerenga 6 1300 61.10% Brann 0 1204 14.95% 23.96%
3 1985-09-29 30.8 @ Rosenborg 5 1303 72.46% Eik Tonsberg 1 1033 6.27% 21.26%
4 1985-06-23 31.0 @ Bryne 6 1219 59.28% Eik Tonsberg 0 1143 16.55% 24.17%
5 1985-06-09 31.3 @ Kongsvinger 6 1207 58.10% Start 0 1144 17.61% 24.29%
6 1985-10-12 32.0 @ Start 6 1175 64.31% Eik Tonsberg 1 1038 12.23% 23.46%
7 1985-05-16 32.1 @ Lillestrom 8 1258 58.41% Eik Tonsberg 0 1192 17.33% 24.26%
8 1985-06-09 32.5 @ Bryne 4 1196 53.38% Molde 0 1180 21.99% 24.64%
9 1985-08-11 32.8 @ Moss 2 1174 60.48% Eik Tonsberg 0 1085 15.48% 24.03%
10 1985-09-08 33.0 @ Mjondalen 3 1224 54.77% Viking 0 1195 20.68% 24.55%
11 1985-06-10 33.2 @ Brann 3 1202 53.85% Eik Tonsberg 0 1182 21.54% 24.61%
12 1985-06-30 33.3 @ Lillestrom 3 1324 56.17% Rosenborg 0 1282 19.38% 24.46%
13 1985-09-15 33.5 @ Lillestrom 6 1349 62.15% Mjondalen 1 1241 14.04% 23.81%
14 1985-05-13 33.6 @ Rosenborg 4 1222 50.18% Brann 0 1234 25.04% 24.78%
15 1985-10-06 33.7 @ Lillestrom 1 1366 67.18% Brann 0 1188 9.95% 22.87%
16 1985-05-16 33.8 @ Viking 3 1222 52.02% Kongsvinger 0 1218 23.27% 24.71%
17 1985-10-12 34.3 @ Bryne 2 1203 55.78% Viking 0 1164 19.74% 24.48%
18 1985-05-27 34.4 @ Valerenga 5 1294 61.35% Moss 1 1195 14.73% 23.92%
19 1985-06-03 34.5 @ Viking 2 1211 55.01% Mjondalen 0 1179 20.45% 24.54%
20 1985-09-08 34.5 @ Valerenga 3 1313 72.37% Eik Tonsberg 1 1044 6.33% 21.30%
21 1985-05-27 34.9 @ Rosenborg 1 1241 61.42% Start 0 1141 14.67% 23.91%
22 1985-06-10 35.1 @ Rosenborg 1 1268 61.26% Moss 0 1170 14.81% 23.93%
23 1985-06-24 35.4 @ Start 3 1119 46.04% Moss 0 1165 29.08% 24.88%
24 1985-08-25 35.8 Lillestrom 1 1349 58.57% @ Eik Tonsberg 0 1070 17.94% 23.49%
25 1985-05-05 36.0 @ Lillestrom 2 1227 50.46% Start 0 1237 24.77% 24.77%